Road Transport 1
Road Transport 1
INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE ET
STRATEGIQUE DE L’ESTUAIRE
ESTUARY ACADEMIC
AND STRATEGIC
INSTITUTE
(IUEs / INSAM)
DEPARTMENT: INTERNATIONAL TRADE
LEVEL: 1
Cost-effective and high quality transport systems are key elements of efficient
logistics, which is a pillar of any modern economy. In most of the developing world, fluidity of
cargo and people is almost entirely dependent on road transport. Consumer expectations and
production requirements increasingly require that transport operators provide the best services
that are the safest and most affordable for their clients. However, in many countries logistics
performance remains low and insufficient to effectively contribute to economic and social
development. Therefore, any improvement of road transport services could have immediate
significant impacts on all other economic sectors. Furthermore, the social contribution of road
transport would also be strengthened in terms of employment, living conditions, and social
welfare. In turn, these developments would create new markets and generate new trade flows.
In return, the road transport industry is expected to continuously adapt to ensure its long-term
success. This adaptation is an important ingredient as governments implement policies and
strategies for the development of their countries or regions. Furthermore, with globalization,
transport and particularly road transport are key drivers for mobility and trade and indirectly for
growth, poverty reduction, and prosperity.
1 For the purpose of this Guide, “vehicle” refers to trucks and other commercial freight vehicles.
Amongst all the major reforms in transport, reforming road transport services can be the least
costly for the public purse, because in a vast majority of countries the sector is private. However,
it is always important to acknowledge that reforms can have significant social spillovers.
Reforms cannot be simply imposed and automatically implemented adaptation is an important
ingredient as governments implement policies and strategies for the development of their
countries or regions. Furthermore, with globalization, transport and particularly road transport
are key drivers for mobility and trade and indirectly for growth, poverty reduction, and
prosperity
• comes in combination with other reforms (e.g., fiscal consolidation, poverty reduction,
major infrastructure programs);
• includes compensation for those who will lose as a consequence of changes (and especially
so if politics can take credit for that);
• is imposed by the rules of a “club” to which the country wants to become a full member
(for example, EU or WTO), or by the circumstances
(climate change, economic or financial crisis)
• is well timed in an electoral cycle—either when the decision makers have a lot of political
capital to expend or to gain; and
• benefits a group with political power, and costs are distributed across groups with no veto
power (road transport services is an area with multiple vested interests, due to the short
time frame for return on investment).
Origin
In the first half of the 20th century, before WWII, international trade was very limited and
dominated by maritime exchanges, while domestic trade was essentially local and did not require
much movement. Therefore, the road transport sector mainly developed in the form of individual
undertakings to serve local markets while the railway network, in particular in North America
and Europe, started to develop and expand to serve long-distance international routes as far as
goods transport was concerned.
After WWII, the need for reconstruction created a new demand for the international
exchange of goods, which in Europe depended on road transport, which had to adapt to the
evolution in market exchanges and the need for local movement and long-distance transportation.
The flexibility of the road transport sector, its ability to ensure door-to-door transport and its cost
effectiveness allowed the sector to gain a significant share of the transport market compared to
other modes. Indeed, road transport is a part of most supply chains, at the very least always
providing first and last mile connectivity.
The evolution was in particular noticed in countries with an important tradition in maritime
trade where freight forwarding activities first emerged and transport companies developed as a
core element of value adding logistics services. Today road transport services are a part of
assembling and production phases undertaken by logistics providers.
The evolution has consequences on the structure of the sector: the undertakings offering
global services are increasingly concentrating their activities on other aspects of
Better access to
transport
services/
connectivity
Lower
environmental
externalities
Instruments Intervention Outputs Responses Outcomes
Investments Trade
Inclusion (more
opportunities)
Sustainability
(improved
Figure 1 gives an overview of the existing policy instruments in the transport sector and the related environment &
outputs and potential outcomes of using one or several of the instruments. While these Guiding quality of life)
Principles cover most of the elements that are highlighted, they do not discuss physical infrastructure or
detailed technology aspects. These are widely covered in other readily available literature and guidance
material.
The evolution has consequences on the structure of the sector: the undertakings offering
global services are increasingly concentrating their activities on other aspects of the logistics3
and spending less and less on purely transport activities.
As a result, they often contract with their clients global logistics services including transport,
and then subcontract the carriage (physical movement of goods) to road transport companies.
Service provision is often characterized by distinct market segmentation, with big players and
freight integrators who contract with clients and subcontractors who handle the physical
movement of goods without much added value.
In many markets, the road transport sector is consistent with the 80/20 rule: 20 percent of
the road transport companies employing more than 10 people each and realizing 80 percent of
the turnover, and 80 percent of the companies employing less than 10 people each and realizing
only 20 percent of the turnover of the sector.
Own Account
Transport In parallel to the above general evolution, in the 1950s big industries in
developed economies, especially those in the chemical, oil and construction business, faced with
the atomization of the road transport sector, developed in-house transport capabilities that were
integrated within their companies. In contrast to reliance on commercial transport (also
designated as “public,” “for hire” or “for reward”), own account transport implies that the
shippers of goods own their fleets of vehicles and employ their own crews dedicated to transport
of their goods. Own account transportation became very popular in developed economies and led
to a decrease in the market share of the commercial road transport sector because through this
operating mechanism industrialists were ensured the complete control over their transport
activities from the economic, social as well as safety and security perspective.
While this was not the most efficient way of moving goods (raw materials or finished
products) because the vehicles were often only loaded one way, and vehicles and drivers
incurred costs for the company even during periods when there was no freight to carry,
industrialists nevertheless preferred own account transportation due to the control it provided
them. However, the transport industry responded with the development of professional services
by the specialized transport companies, reducing the importance of, and need to resort to, own
account transport. Third party-provided services tended to offer more cost efficiency and were
reliable. In recent times, however, a reverse evolution has taken place, especially in emerging
economies and in developing countries. Faced with a poorly organized and unreliable road
transport sector, some companies often set up their own internal transport services. In some
countries such as Ivory Coast, own account transport activity may be larger than the commercial
ones in terms of employment, number of companies, and tonnage transported. The shippers in
Ivory Coast and other low income countries are mainly importers and manufacturers of raw
products like sugar, cereals, but also cement and construction materials. Their production cycles
highly depend on the timely supply of basic products, and they therefore look to fully control the
road transport component of their logistics chains by developing in-house transport capacity.
This practice is not only common to development countries. Own account operators in
Greece, who primarily use their vehicles to transport their own goods, account for over 90
percent of the trucking industry. Another reason why own account transport may become
predominant is that in some countries this activity is less strictly regulated than commercial
transport. In countries with weak enforcement capacity this may encourage transport operators to
register as own account carriers while still performing commercial activities. Such practices are
counterproductive, mainly because they can significantly distort competition, with negative
impacts on service quality and safety. It can therefore be reasonably expected that through
appropriate modernization and reform of the road transport sector, with the improvement of
professionalism and efficiency, this type of own account transportation will decrease in favour of
commercial transport.
Road transport also has an important social dimension through the opportunities it offers
for entrepreneurship and job creation. The sector has traditionally played a key role in upward
mobility as it allowed, for example, professional drivers to become entrepreneurs and create their
own business, developing it as a small or medium size company. This upward mobility effect is
still very appropriate in developing countries and emerging economies where becoming a carrier
or a road transport operator is a step to entrepreneurship. In general, road transport can create a
significant number of jobs. The direct employment consists at a minimum of professional drivers
and managers/owners of small companies, and for more robust entities it also consists in
administrative and commercial staff as well as technicians and maintenance workers. A recent
study in East Africa found that there were 1.2 jobs for each truck on the road. In addition to the
direct employment, the sector generates a significant number of indirect jobs and employment.
An important first step in any reform effort is to identify the issues that need to be
addressed, prioritize them and design effective interventions. In this regard information is key.
Appropriate diagnostic tools are needed to obtain reliable data and to design effective
interventions. This section outlines the most common issues that negatively affect the efficiency
and sustainability of the road transport sector and their underlying causes. It presents the
instruments that can be used to assess the scale of a specific issue identified, as well as describe
mechanisms developed at international, regional and national levels to assist governments in
improving their
Monitoring of the transport sector.
What Impacts on the Efficiency of the Road Freight Transport Sector?
The road transport sector can suffer from several characteristics that compromise its
efficiency and Effectiveness, among them, a high level of informality paired with a low level of
professionalism, bad condition of vehicles, and weak professional representation resulting in
large part from the atomization of the industry.
Informality Due to Insufficient, or Lack of, Regulation
Informality negatively affects the efficiency of road Transport services, impacting
among others the reliability and predictability of services, road safety and prices. Also,
informality reduces revenues to the transport sector. In many parts of the world and in particular
in emerging economies, to further liberalization of the road transport sector without qualitative
criteria for entry, and in the absence of transitional and accompanying measures, the road
transport market has often been dominated by informal transport operators and sometimes also
by intermediaries. These are players that managed to penetrate the freight and commercial
distribution markets to an extent where they became a compulsory partner but with little value
added and without legal existence. These informal players distort the market by preventing the
free and direct interaction between Transport operators and shippers.
This is for example the case in some countries of Central and Western Africa where
“coxers” absorb an important part of the transport price paid by the shipper, without really
bringing any additional value to transport services.
Industry Atomization and Poor Representation
One of the common characteristics of the road transport sector throughout the
developing world in particular, with few exceptions, is its atomization. The high number of small
and medium size operators brings to the sector a flexibility that is increasingly needed in
globalized economies. Atomization reinforces individual entrepreneurship which contributes to
social upward mobility. However, these small economic entities often encounter difficulties to
capitalize themselves, to act as independent economic actors, and to develop profitable and
sustainable commercial approaches. These factors could weaken the industry as a whole and
jeopardize its ability to provide increasingly sophisticated services.
The dispersion of the profession also provides an opening for informal practices, as
discussed above, thereby weakening even more the sustainability of the sector. One of the
consequences of the atomization of the road transport sector is the absence of a solid professional
representation in most emerging economies. The individual or very small transport operators
have managed to create a multitude of small associations, syndicates or trade unions with local
coverage and membership. This situation, also influenced by specific local and social aspects
(e.g., ethnicity, clans, religion) results in a lack of prominence of the road transport sector in the
public-private dialogue.
The traditional mission of the professional representation is to promote and defend the
interests of the profession for the benefit of all its members, for example in the dialogue and
negotiation with the authorities. It implies neutrality and equity towards all members. However,
in some countries these small local syndicates/trade unions go beyond their role of representing
their members and intervene in market operations, for example by penetrating the freight
distribution and imposing freight allocation mechanisms such as tour de rôle (queuing system),
in which freight is allocated preferentially to the members of the respective syndicate or trade
union. Such involvement can distort the market and have a negative effect on the commercial
activities that should be performed by the operators on a level playing field
Skills Shortage
Professional capacity is one of the key factors for efficiency, safety and security of transport
operations at all levels. A good driver is the result of a combination of personal skills and
training. There are still countries where the professional driving license is obtained without
any specific training. But a good driver is not enough for a transport operation to be efficient;
adequate infrastructure and vehicle and competent managers are other essential factors. In
many countries in the developing world there is no specific training for transport managers;
neither are there accredited institutions to provide such training. In addition, a more recent
problem in this area is that in many developed countries there is a shortage of truck drivers
because the profession is not attractive (wages too low compared to the number of conditions
to comply with).
Obsolescence of Fleets
In many developing countries vehicles are obsolete or not properly maintained. They
generate relatively high amounts of pollution and are unsafe. In some instances the
legislation does not provide for mandatory regular technical inspection; and often, the rules
on weights and dimensions are not enforced. This results in inefficient operation (because of
frequent breakdowns), high costs and risk for the safety on the roads, as well as a limitation
of the access to the market (e.g., the shipper would not allow its just-in-time cargo to be
loaded on an unreliable truck).
commerce, or receive complaints from shippers and the population at large (e.g., about high
transport prices, congestion, pollution, etc.). Furthermore, national as well as regional and
international transport statistics and also specific surveys often indicate the issues and
potential weaknesses of the sector. Therefore, decision makers usually have a good
knowledge of existing issues to be resolved.
In many instances the symptoms that signal a need for reform include:
In order to successfully address one or several of the above issues policy makers have
to determine their scale and urgency, their underlying causes and the role of the different
actors involved. Gathering solid and reliable data is crucial. In some cases the level of
detail of the national road transport data collected might be sufficient to set priorities and
design effective policy interventions and monitor changes. However, in many cases (and
especially in absence of reliable national or regional transport data collection
mechanisms) it is useful or even critical to collect primary data. The data can be organized
around issues and the key categories of actors that are involved or are affected (Figure 2).
Initial Assessment
A logical process can be followed to diagnose the main issues, prioritize them and design
effective interventions (Figure 3).
In order to carry out an appropriate sectoral diagnostic, various tools have been
developed at national, regional and international levels. For an assessment of the road
transport sector, a thorough analysis of the available data sources (and their timeliness
and quality) on each of these levels should be carried out. It is recommended in the
first place to look for national and international road transport statistics and data.
• lack means to properly collect and consolidate data and develop an appropriate
methodology; and
• have a data collection mechanism in place that is outdated and not reliable.
There are several methods through which data can be collected, including: a) international
datasets and indicators; b) discussions with operators; c) surveys; d) statutory requirements for
operators to supply data; and e) electronic monitoring systems. In general, the preliminary
analysis of existing national, regional and international datasets gives good indications on the
core issues, their causes and scale. In some cases, governments may decide that this information
is sufficient to conduct the necessary analysis and undertake certain remedial interventions. In
other cases, governments interested in carrying out a reform may want to collect additional data
in order to better understand the scale and urgency of the existing issues and prioritize
interventions. Also, the collection of additional data would help to set an accurate baseline in
order to measure progress. Therefore, designing a targeted survey to collect data on a specific
issue might be the best option depending on the country, the type of issue to be addressed and the
available resources. In some countries, the absence or the lack of appropriate legislation, data
collection mechanisms and institutions organized at state levels could make the survey the only
option to obtain enough data on an issue in order to be able to design a targeted intervention.
However, choosing this ‘single approach’ for a specific issue should not preclude parallel actions
aimed at setting up appropriate legislation and permanent data collection mechanisms. The
lessons learned and the results obtained from conducting a survey could be as well the starting
point for implementing a sustainable framework for collecting road transport data.
International datasets: Almost all the countries in the world are covered in international
studies or reports. In general, these global or regional reports evaluate the performance of
each country or group of countries, and they provide either a full set of information and data,
or a ranking of countries’ performance in the area of interest. Consulting those data may
contribute to better understanding of where the country stands in terms of its performance.
• The World Bank’s Logistics Performance Index and Doing Business Report;
2 3
Exchanges with the sector stakeholders: Exchanges with actors in the road transport
sector provide governments a good sense of the main issues that affect the efficiency
of the sector. Such preliminary analyses could be based on formal and informal
feedback received from the industry on an ad hoc basis, or using Delphi techniques,
from newspaper articles or reports/comments from other government agencies. While
the information is valuable and should contribute to further analysis, reliable and
updated data are crucial in order to appreciate the real situation on the ground. Beside
information obtained through sustainable data collection mechanisms, additional data
is often required in order to understand the underlying causes, prioritize measures and
design efficient interventions.
2
3
4 http://internationaltransportforum.org/irtadpublic/about.html
Questionnaires and surveys: The collection of primary data through surveys is often
indispensable to fill this gap and gather additional evidence. Figure 4 gives an
overview of the actors involved in the road transport sector and their potential roles in
primary data collection. The central block in Figure 4 represents data collected from
the different government agencies; the right block represents data from the regional
and international bodies; and the left block represents data collected from transport
associations, shippers and clients.
One of the most widely known international survey instruments on transport is the
“Common Questionnaire,”5which is the result of a joint initiative and longstanding history
of cooperation between the UNECE, Eurostat 10 and the ITF. The Common Questionnaire
is not supported by a legal act, but is based on an informal agreement with the
participating countries. However, the completeness of the questionnaire varies from
country to country. In total, comparable transport data collected through the Common
Questionnaire is available for close to 60 countries worldwide.
The Questionnaire harmonizes and standardizes transport data at the international level so as to
improve comparability and reduce the workload of national statistical offices. This has resulted
in the regular publication of a multilingual glossary of transport statistics, which provides
globally standardized definitions and concepts both inside the EU and beyond. Box 1 presents
the scope of the Common
Usually, the governance of the road transport services sector is a competence of the
line ministry of transport, which issues regulations and implements them, directly or
through specialized agencies. However, the scope of competence of the line ministry may
vary from “heavy,” more traditional, to “light,” modern structures.
In some countries (e.g., Burundi), the Ministry of Transport is responsible for all
transport modes and their respective infrastructure: land (road, rail, and inland
waterways), air and maritime sectors. In such cases, the road transport sector is only one
component of the ministerial portfolio and can be organized as a Directorate. In other
countries, the transport competences are assigned by mode; for example, in India civil
aviation, road transport, railways and shipping each has its own ministry. In Russia, there
is one Ministry of Transport, which exerts its authority
through Federal Agencies in charge of individual modes of transport. It may also be that
the transport sector is part of a multi-sectoral ministry, such as the Ministry of
Sustainable Development and Energy in France. In the European Commission, all modes
of transport involved in cross-border movements are grouped under the competence of a
dedicated commissioner. For railway, maritime and air transport the authority is exerted
through specialized European Agencies.
The form of organization and the place of the transport sector within a government
often reveals the political and economic importance given to the sector. Nevertheless,
there are cases where the place of the ministry is not very significant, although transport
as an economic sector remains very important, notably in countries where regulations and
institutions are in place and functioning properly, and where the private sector is well
structured, organized and efficient. For example in Sweden, the Ministry of Enterprises
and Innovation is responsible for the business sector, housing and transport, ICT,
regional growth and rural policy. Transport includes railways, roads, shipping and
aviation, as well as transport and infrastructure research. The number of transport
ministerial staff is small and the authority for each mode of transport is exerted through
specialized agencies.
another ministry such as the Ministry of Economic Infrastructure in Ivory Coast or the
Ministry of Works in Tanzania. Local authorities in many countries are involved in the
administration of secondary/local networks.
• legal and regulatory affairs (e.g., drafting rules and regulations related to the sector)
• technical issues (e.g., vehicles, special transports, dangerous goods)
• projects and infrastructure aspects
• social affairs (e.g., driving and rest times)
• certification (e.g., of professional training institutions)
• inspection (e.g., checking compliance with the criteria for access to the profession)
• road safety (it may also be an inter-ministerial competence).
In regions that are highly integrated and where the legislation is adopted at the regional level,
the trend is to limit the attributions of the ministries to elaborating national policies and
strategies. The implementation and enforcement of the legislation at the national level is
delegated to specialized agencies. This does not necessarily translate in overall lighter structures
but decentralizes to a certain extent the processes and ensures a reasonable degree of impartiality
in implementation and enforcement (including penalizing infringements). In many countries,
some of the functions or tasks attributed to road transport agencies are performed by private or
semiprivate entities acting by delegation or under a concession contract of service. It is very
often the case for routine or periodical technical inspection of vehicles.
National laws and regulations are paramount for the effective organization and efficient
functioning of road transport. They are part of the business-enabling environment and should be
In Romania, a member State of the European Union, the Ministry of Transport (MoT) has a dual
role of specialized body and State authority for transport. As transport specialized body, some of
MoT’s main responsibilities are to:
• elaborate and implement strategies, policies and development programs;
• organize and finance activities in relation to the collection of transport statistical and other
documentary data;
• ensure users’ rights to choose freely the mode, the operator and the mean of transport;
• support the development of public, multimodal and combined transport;
• stimulate initiative and ensure transport operators’ autonomy;
• concession transport assets belonging to the State, on behalf of the latter.
As State transport authority, the MoT has implementation, inspection and enforcement
attributions that are exerted through specialized bodies, to which MoT delegated some of its
competencies. One of them, the Romanian Road Authority is a technical body responsible for:
• licensing road transport operators and economic agents performing activities that are ancillary
to road transport (e.g., terminals);
• route licensing for operators performing regular or special transport of passenger transport;
• certifying enterprises that perform own-account transport operations;
• authorizing driving schools and instructors/trainers;
• registering and keeping records of road transport operators, own-account transport companies,
and safety advisors;
• issuing certificates of professional competence for road transport personnel;
• implementing road transport technical norms and regulations;
• managing road safety audits including the training of road safety auditors; • acting as
Secretariat for the Interministerial Road Safety Council.
This structure is also represented at the local level in each of the administrative divisions of the
country.
Another entity, the State Inspection for Road Transport Control is a technical body responsible
for controlling the transport operators and their vehicles and drivers for compliance with the
national and international requirements in areas regulated by the Road Authority.
Finally, the Romanian Automotive Register is the technical specialized body designated by the
Ministry of Transport as a competent authority in the field of road vehicles, road safety,
environment protection and quality assurance, with the following main responsibilities:
• to grant the national type, individual approvals and certificates of conformity (as applicable)
for the road vehicles, and their systems, parts and separate technical entities;
• to perform the periodical technical inspection for certain categories of motor vehicles;
• to license the technical inspection stations and to check the periodical technical inspection
activity;
• to license
Prepared the workshops
and Lectured performing
by: TAMEUKONG the works
Romario of mounting, adjustment and checking the19
670653515
vehicles and their components;
• to certify the quality management system.
Source: Authors based on Ministry of Transport of Romania (www.mt.ro).
LECTURES NOTES ON ROAD TRANSPORT 2020
comprehensive yet clear and simple, in order to make their implementation and enforcement
optimal. The national laws and regulations applicable to road transport should mainly focus on: