The document outlines the standing rules of the Associated Student Government Judiciary at the University of Arkansas for the 2010-2011 year. It details procedures for interpretation hearings, election complaints, ethics complaints, membership issues, and operational procedures. Interpretation hearings allow members to request interpretation of ASG documents. Election and ethics complaints provide processes for filing, investigating, and holding formal hearings on complaints. Membership and removal procedures are specified. Meeting operations like quorum, order of business, and impartiality challenges are also defined.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document outlines the standing rules of the Associated Student Government Judiciary at the University of Arkansas for the 2010-2011 year. It details procedures for interpretation hearings, election complaints, ethics complaints, membership issues, and operational procedures. Interpretation hearings allow members to request interpretation of ASG documents. Election and ethics complaints provide processes for filing, investigating, and holding formal hearings on complaints. Membership and removal procedures are specified. Meeting operations like quorum, order of business, and impartiality challenges are also defined.
The document outlines the standing rules of the Associated Student Government Judiciary at the University of Arkansas for the 2010-2011 year. It details procedures for interpretation hearings, election complaints, ethics complaints, membership issues, and operational procedures. Interpretation hearings allow members to request interpretation of ASG documents. Election and ethics complaints provide processes for filing, investigating, and holding formal hearings on complaints. Membership and removal procedures are specified. Meeting operations like quorum, order of business, and impartiality challenges are also defined.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document outlines the standing rules of the Associated Student Government Judiciary at the University of Arkansas for the 2010-2011 year. It details procedures for interpretation hearings, election complaints, ethics complaints, membership issues, and operational procedures. Interpretation hearings allow members to request interpretation of ASG documents. Election and ethics complaints provide processes for filing, investigating, and holding formal hearings on complaints. Membership and removal procedures are specified. Meeting operations like quorum, order of business, and impartiality challenges are also defined.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5
University of Arkansas
Associated Student Government Judiciary
Standing Rules 2010-2011
Section I. Interpretation Hearings
A. A request for interpretation of the ASG Code or Constitution may be made by submitting a written plea to the Chief Justice. Any member of the ASG may request judicial interpretation of the Code or Constitution. B. Any ASG agent may submit in writing an alternate interpretation to the Chief Justice for consideration at least five (5) business days in advance of the hearing at which the initial request is to be considered.) C. Following the presentations of interpretations requested, the Judiciary shall sequester itself to deliberate the case. D. After a decision has been reached, the Chief Justice shall report the decision to the parties involved, the ASG Executives, ASG Senate, and ASG Webmaster. The Chief Justice or appointed justice will then give a report to be read during the normal Senate meeting. E. ASGJ interpretations shall be posted on the ASG Website within ten (10) business days of a decision being reached.
Section II. Election Complaints
A. The ASGJ shall hear all election complaints filed through the CLCE. B. The ASGJ shall be convened by the Elections Committee within 72 hours upon receipt of complaint.
Section III. Ethics Complaints
A. An Ethics Complaint may be brought against an agent of ASG by any member of ASG by submitting a written plea to the Chief Justice. B. The ASGJ shall convene upon receiving a complaint to decide if the ASGJ shall continue hearing the complaint, however must give five (5) business days notice before meeting. C. Upon deciding to hear a complaint, the Judiciary shall form an Investigations Committee to investigate the allegations. The Committee shall be composed of personnel as described in the ASG Constitution. D. The Investigations Committee members shall report to the ASGJ within a reasonable time limit when the investigation is finished. E. At the meeting during which the ASGJ reviews the reports of the Investigations Committee, the Justices shall decide whether to proceed with a formal hearing. A majority vote of Justices present shall be sufficient to proceed with a formal hearing. F. The Chief Justice, after reviewing the reports of the Investigations Committee and the evidence involved in the case, shall set a meeting date allowing at least five (5) business days for which the complainant and defendant shall be allowed to gather information for arguments. G. The complainant must notify upon written request the defendant of all incriminating evidence within a timely manner if requested. H. The formal hearing shall be conducted on the premise that the defendant is innocent unless proven otherwise. I. The formal hearing shall be held as a closed meeting with only the ASG Advisor, the ASGJ, and those parties concerned with the case. J. The complainant shall begin the formal proceedings by presenting the complaint to the ASGJ. The complainant shall be allowed an oral presentation which will be followed by a questioning period from the ASGJ. K. The defendant shall then be allowed to present a defense to the ASGJ which shall consist of an oral presentation followed by a questioning period from the ASGJ. L. Any witnesses or evidence concerning the case shall be presented at this time. M. Complaint shall present final arguments, subject to final questioning by ASGJ. N. Defendant shall present final arguments, subject to final questioning by ASGJ. O. Following the presentations, the ASGJ shall sequester itself to deliberate. Removing the defendant shall require a 2/3 vote of Justices present. Should this requirement not be met, it shall be considered a decision to reprimand the defendant. Section IV. ASGJ Membership A. The ASGJ shall be convened by the Chief Justice should a Justice obtain three absences to discuss the continued membership of that Justice. B. The Justice in question shall be given an opportunity to present an explanation to the remaining Justices at the meeting. C. Following the explanation, the Judiciary shall vote to decide whether the Justice in question will be removed from the Judiciary. D. Removing a Justice shall require a three-fourths (3/4) vote of the remaining members of the ASGJ.
Section V. Operational Procedures
A. Meetings of the ASGJ shall be convened by the Chief Justice of the ASGJ in accordance with the rules set down by the ASG Constitution. Meetings can be convened for the following purposes only: 1) Requests to interpret the ASG Code and Constitution; 2) Complaints filed to CLCE 3) Investigations of ASG Agents for Alleged Violations of the Standard of Ethics 4) Issues involving the membership of the ASGJ. B. The ASG Advisor shall serve as the Sergeant-at-Arms for meetings of the ASG Judiciary. C. Deliberations by the ASGJ on a case will be closed meetings. D. Should deliberations last longer than thirty (30) minutes, the parties shall be allowed to leave and will be notified of the decision of the ASGJ within twenty-four (24) hours of a decision being rendered. E. Decisions shall be made by a majority vote of Justices. F. Following a decision, the Chief Justice shall appoint Justices to author opinions of the Court: 1) The Chief Justice shall appoint from among the majority an author for the Majority Opinion of the Court. 2) The Chief shall appoint from among the minority an author for the Dissenting Opinion of the Court. 3) Should multiple Justice dissent for differing reasons, each shall be allowed to author a Dissenting Opinion. 4) Should a Justice support the decision of the court for different reasons than those in the majority opinion, the Justice shall be allowed to author a Concurring Opinion. 5) All opinions must be submitted to the Chief Justice within a time deemed reasonable by the Chief Justice. G. If any new and significant evidence surface after a decision has been rendered for an ethics case, the defendant may file for a rehearing. 1) The procedure for filing a rehearing shall be identical to the procedure for filing the original case, except that the request for rehearing shall explicitly state the new evidence and its importance to the case. 2) The decision reached at the end of the rehearing shall supersede the decision of the original trial. H. The Standing Rules of the ASGJ may be suspended by a two thirds (2/3) vote of Justices present at a hearing. I. Both parties shall be allowed to have an advisor present during the hearing. J. Both parties must submit a witness list to the Chief Justice two (2) business days in advance of the hearing, excluding any rebuttal witnesses. The Chief Justice shall be allowed to disallow any evidence that has been obtained unethically or is otherwise inappropriate. K. Each witness, including the complainant and defendant, shall be sworn in prior to speaking to the Judiciary. L. The ASGJ shall operate under the latest edition of Roberts’ Rules of Order for all issues not delineated in these standing rules.
Section VI. Order of Business
A. The Chief Justice shall call the ASGJ to order. B. The Clerk shall verify that a quorum of the ASGJ is present. If quorum is not present, both parties may agree to waive the quorum requirement and proceed with the hearing. C. All persons present shall introduce themselves in the following order: 1) The Chief Justice of the ASGJ 2) Associate Justices of the ASGJ 3) The ASG Advisor 4) The ASGJ Clerk 5) The complainant or appellant 6) The defendant 7) Any witnesses called to speak before the Judiciary. 8) If witnesses are present, they shall be announced in the order of which they shall be questioned: complainant witnesses followed by defense witnesses. D. Following introductions, the parties shall be notified that the meetings are to proceed in an orderly fashion, and any parties instigating deviation from the order may be judged in contempt by the Chief Justice. E. The basis for the meeting shall be announced. 1) If an Elections Complaint, the grounds for the complaint shall be filed through the CLCE and presented by the Chief Justice. 2) If an interpretation request, the requested interpretation shall be presented by the Chief Justice 3) For all other meetings, the complaint shall be presented by the Chief Justice. F. Witnesses are excused and asked to wait outside. Witnesses will wait in isolation before making a statement to the Judiciary. G. The defendant or Elections representative shall be allowed to challenge the impartiality of any member of the ASGJ, and all parties shall come to an agreement about solutions to suggested impartialities. H. The complainant or appellant shall be allowed to challenge the impartiality of any member of the ASGJ, and all parties shall come to an agreement about solutions to suggested impartialities. I. The complainant, appellant, or interpretation requestor shall have the opportunity to present an opening statement. J. The defendant or Elections Representative shall have the opportunity to present an opening statement. K. The Justices shall question the complainant, appellant, or requestor. L. The Justices shall question the witnesses, if any, brought by the complainant, appellant, or requestor. M. The Justices shall question the defendant or Elections Representative. N. The Justices shall question the witnesses, if any, brought by the defendant or Elections Representative. O. The parties shall be allowed to present the Judiciary with a list of questions to ask the other party. 1) The defendant or Elections Representative shall have questions asked first, at the discretion of the Judiciary. 2) The appellant, complainant, or requestor shall have questions asked, at the discretion of the Judiciary. P. The Justices shall be allowed a final chance to question both parties and their witnesses. Q. The defendant or Elections Representative shall present closing statements. R. The complainant, appellant, or requestor shall present closing statements S. The ASGJ shall recuse itself and deliberate the issue. No records shall be kept during deliberations. T. The ASGJ shall announce its decision to both parties. U. The Chief Justice shall appoint an author for the majority opinion, and other Justices shall be allowed the chance to write dissenting or concurring opinions to be presented to the Chief Justice within time deemed reasonable by the Chief Justice. V. All parties shall present to the Judiciary within time deemed as reasonable by the Chief Justice with equal opportunity for all parties. W. The Chief Justice shall adjourn the meeting.
Section VII. Office of the Attorney General
A. In accordance with Title III Section 9 of the ASG Code, the Chief Justice shall appoint an Attorney General, confirmed by a supermajority vote of the Judiciary. B. The ASGJ Attorney General may not concurrently serve as a Justice or in the ASG Executive or Legislative branch. C. The Attorney General shall attend ASG Senate meetings following the same attendance policy adhered to by the ASG senators. D. The Attorney General shall investigate any claims of misconduct. E. The Attorney General shall serve concurrently with the Chief Justice pending annual adoption of the Standing Rules. F. The Chief Justice shall have the power to dismiss the Attorney General at will.