Environment Management: Assignment II Public Interest Litigation
Environment Management: Assignment II Public Interest Litigation
Environment Management: Assignment II Public Interest Litigation
Assignment II
Prior to the 1980s, only the aggrieved party could approach the courts for justice.
However, post 1980s and after the emergency era, the apex court decided to reach
out to the people and hence it devised an innovative way wherein a person or a civil
society group could approach the supreme court seeking legal remedies in cases
where public interest is at stake.
Litigation for public interest (PIL) was started to protect the fundamental rights of
people who are poor, ignorant or in socially / economically disadvantaged position.
It is different from ordinary litigation, in that it is not filed by one private person
against another for the enforcement of a personal right. The presence of 'public
interest' is important to file a PIL.
• There must be a public injury and public wrong caused by the wrongful act or
omission of the state or public authority.
A Public Interest Litigation can be filed only against a State or Central Government,
Municipal Authorities, and not any private party.
For example, in the case of a private factory in say Delhi is causing pollution, then
people living in its vicinity or any other person can file a PIL against the Government
of India, the State Pollution Board and also against the private factory.
2
Anuradha Sharma
However, a PIL cannot be filed against the private party alone; the concerned
State Government, and State authority has to be made a party
• A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) can be filed in any High Court or directly in
the Supreme Court.
• It is not necessary that the petitioner has suffered some injury of his own or
has had personal grievance to litigate.
• He is a member of the public acting bona fide and having sufficient interest in
instituting an action for redressal of public wrong or public injury.
A PIL may be filed like a written petition. Supreme Court has treated even letters
addressed to the court as PIL.
A PIL is filed in a High court, and then two copies of the petition have to be filed.
Also, an advance copy of the petition has to be served on the each respondent, i.e.
opposite party, and this proof of service has to be affixed on the petition.
If a PIL is filed in the Supreme Court, then (four + one) (i.e. five) sets of petition have
to be filed. The opposite party is served the copy only when notice is issued.
3
Anuradha Sharma
ii. Litigation can be time consuming.
iii .Litigation can take away decision making capability/strength from
communities.
iv. An adverse decision can affect the strength of the movement.
v. Litigation involvement can divert the attention of the community from the real
issues.
Proceedings, in the PIL commence and carry on in the same manner, as other
cases
• However, in between the proceedings if the judge feels he may appoint a
commissioner, to inspect allegations like pollution being caused, trees being
cut, sewer problems, etc
• After filing of replies, by opposite party, and rejoinder by the petitioner, final
hearing takes place, and the judge gives his final decision.
• The allegations against state and private party should be backed by reliable
evidence, for eg in a PIL on malnutrition deaths you need reports indicating it
and data of the state regarding child mortality rates from various government
surveys. Research based evidence will hold well in a PIL.
• It will be good to make an NGO working on the issue a party to the petition, if
there can be more than one organization agreeing on an issue it will hold
more ground in the court.
4
Anuradha Sharma
EXAMPLE CASES OF Public Interest Litigation
Supreme Court held that petitioner although not a riparian owner is entitled to move
the court for the enforcement of statutory provisions, as he is the person interested
in protecting the lives of the people who make use of the Ganga water.
2. Further, through the so-called PIL, the litigants can focus attention on and
achieve results pertaining to larger public issues, especially in the fields of
human rights, consumer welfare and environment.
1. However, the development of PIL has also uncovered its pitfalls and
drawbacks. As a result, the apex court itself has been compelled to lay down
certain guidelines to govern the management and disposal of PILs. And the
abuse of PIL is also increasing along with its extended and multifaceted use.
2. Of late, many of the PIL activists in the country have found the PIL as a
handy tool of harassment since frivolous cases could be filed without
investment of heavy court fees as required in private civil litigation and deals
could then be negotiated with the victims of stay orders obtained in the so-
called PILs.
5
Anuradha Sharma
3. Just as a weapon meant for defence can be used equally effectively for
offence, the lowering of the locus standi requirement has permitted privately
motivated interests to pose as public interests. The abuse of PIL has become
more rampant than its use and genuine causes either receded to the
background or began to be viewed with the suspicion generated by spurious
causes mooted by privately motivated interests in the disguise of the so-
called public interests.
All over the world, far from the public eye, thousands of small NGOs, help protect
the natural riches of our planet and promote balance within communities by helping
those most in need.
"Eco Friends performs all such acts that may assist in or be conducive to fostering
environmental education, protection and security".
http://www.ecofriends.org
6
Anuradha Sharma
http://www.environmentevents.org/
OTHERS
7
Anuradha Sharma
• Kshiti Foundation - Our vision is to create sensitivity towards environment &
to awaken the philanthropic side of mankind. We shall facilitate contribution
from everyone who would like to enrich human lives in a significant. way
• Project Agastya - better, more efficient and Sustainable Water Resources
Management in Bangalore
• Rainwater Club - The Bangalorean's Guide to Rooftop Rainwater Harvesting
Among the numerous factors that have contributed to the growth of PIL in this
country, the following deserve special mention:
» The character of the Indian Constitution. Unlike Britain, India has a written
constitution which through Part III (Fundamental Rights) and Part IV (Directive
Principles of State Policy) provides a framework for regulating relations between the
state and its citizens and between citizens inter-se.
» India has some of the most progressive social legislation to be found anywhere in
the world whether it be relating to bonded labor, minimum wages, land ceiling,
environmental protection, etc. This has made it easier for the courts to haul up the
executive when it is not performing its duties in ensuring the rights of the poor as per
the law of the land.
» The liberal interpretation of locus standi where any person can apply to the court
on behalf of those who are economically or physically unable to come before it has
helped. Judges themselves have in some cases initiated suo moto action based on
newspaper articles or letters received
8
Anuradha Sharma
» Although social and economic rights given in the Indian Constitution under Part IV
are not legally enforceable; courts have creatively read these into fundamental rights
thereby making them judicially enforceable. For instance the "right to life" in Article
21 has been expanded to include right to free legal aid, right to live with dignity, right
to education, right to work, freedom from torture, barfetters and hand cuffing in
prisons, etc.
» Sensitive judges have constantly innovated on the side of the poor, for instance,
in the Bandhua Mukti Morcha case in 1983, the Supreme Court put the burden of
proof on the respondent stating it would treat every case of forced labor as a case of
bonded labor unless proven otherwise by the employer.
Similarly in the Asiad workers judgment case, Justice P.N. Bhagwati held that
anyone getting less than the minimum wage can approach the Supreme Court
directly without going through the labor commissioner and lower courts
» In PIL cases where the petitioner is not in a position to provide all the necessary
evidence, either because it is voluminous or because the parties are weak socially
or economically, courts have appointed commissions to collect information on facts
and present it before the bench.
9
Anuradha Sharma