Pil Exam
Pil Exam
Pil Exam
II
a) What is the binding effect of the WHO issuance with regard the
Philippines? (2.5%)
III
The President signs an agreement with his counterpart in another country
involving reciprocity in the treatment of each country's nationals residing in
the other's territory. However, he does not submit the agreement to the
Senate for concurrence.
Sec. 21, Art. VII of the Constitution provides that no treaty or international
agreement shall be valid and effective without such concurrence.
VI
By two Special Agreements concluded between (1) Netherlands and
Germany and (2) Denmark and Germany, the Parties submitted to the
ICJ certain differences concerning the delimitation as between the
Parties of certain areas of the continental shelf in the North Sea which
appertain to them.
VIII
b. Suppose that Kunig filed the letter complaint on 1980, and an order of
Sumaira’s deportation was issued on 1990, can the CID order
Sumaira’s deportation? (2.5%)
IX
Explain the Constitutional doctrines of transformation and incorporation and
relate these doctrines as to the applicability of International Law in the
Philippines. (5%)
State A and State B, two sovereign states, enter into a 10-year mutual
defense treaty. After five years, State A finds that the more progressive
State B did not go to the aid of State A when it was threatened by its strong
neighbor State C. State B reasoned that it had to be prudent and deliberate
in reacting to State C because of their existing trade treaties.
(a) May State A now unilaterally withdraw from its mutual defense treaty
with State B? Explain your answer.
XI
Discuss the theories behind recognition and/or creation of states and relate
the same to the requisites of statehoods under the Montevideo Convention.
(5%)
XII
AA and BB are partners in trade in the city of New York under the firm
name of AABB. Their business consist of transporting passengers and
freight upon the high seas between Holland and US as consignees and
agents. On one of its sail, the US port collector stated that the partners
must pay $1.00 each per passenger before they are permitted to land. The
collection was based on the act of Congress entitled “An act to regulate
immigration” providing that there shall be levied, collected, and paid a duty
of $1.00 for each and every passenger, not a citizen of the United States.
The partners contend that the law violates treaties by the Unites States with
friendly nations. Rule on the partners’ contention.
XIII
XIV
Infinity Jackson, an Australian Citizen, was sought by Australian authorities
for multiple counts of obtaining properties through fraud in her country.
Extradition proceedings were filed before the RTC which rendered a
decision ordering the deportation of Infinity concluding that the documents
submitted by the Australian Government meet the requirements of the
Treaty of Extradition and that the offenses are extraditable offenses. CA
affirmed RTC’s decision. Infinity contends that the provision of the Treaty
giving retroactive effect to the extradition treaty amounts to an ex post facto
law.
b. Suppose that there is no treaty between PH and AU, will your answer
be the same? (2.5%)
XV
Explain Opinio juris sive necessitates in relation with Customs and provide
for an example of one. (5%)