Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 47 views

    A

    Uploaded by

    Mary Jane Polo
    This document lists numerous court cases cited in relation to different sections of the Rules on Evidence. It includes cases cited for sections on judicial notice, judicial admissions, object evidence, best evidence rule, parol evidence rule, witnesses, privileged communications, admissions by a party, hearsay rule, dying declarations, res gestae, official records, burden of proof, presumptions, rights of witnesses, impeachment of witnesses, proof of documents, and standards of proof. The cases are from Philippine courts and relate to both civil and criminal rules of evidence.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    A

    Uploaded by

    Mary Jane Polo
    47 views5 pages
    This document lists numerous court cases cited in relation to different sections of the Rules on Evidence. It includes cases cited for sections on judicial notice, judicial admissions, object evidence, best evidence rule, parol evidence rule, witnesses, privileged communications, admissions by a party, hearsay rule, dying declarations, res gestae, official records, burden of proof, presumptions, rights of witnesses, impeachment of witnesses, proof of documents, and standards of proof. The cases are from Philippine courts and relate to both civil and criminal rules of evidence.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document lists numerous court cases cited in relation to different sections of the Rules on Evidence. It includes cases cited for sections on judicial notice, judicial admissions, object evidence, best evidence rule, parol evidence rule, witnesses, privileged communications, admissions by a party, hearsay rule, dying declarations, res gestae, official records, burden of proof, presumptions, rights of witnesses, impeachment of witnesses, proof of documents, and standards of proof. The cases are from Philippine courts and relate to both civil and criminal rules of evidence.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    47 views5 pages

    A

    Uploaded by

    Mary Jane Polo
    This document lists numerous court cases cited in relation to different sections of the Rules on Evidence. It includes cases cited for sections on judicial notice, judicial admissions, object evidence, best evidence rule, parol evidence rule, witnesses, privileged communications, admissions by a party, hearsay rule, dying declarations, res gestae, official records, burden of proof, presumptions, rights of witnesses, impeachment of witnesses, proof of documents, and standards of proof. The cases are from Philippine courts and relate to both civil and criminal rules of evidence.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 5

    EVIDENCE

    Atty. Demetrio C. Custodio

    RULE 129 SECTIONS 1 & 2 – JUDICIAL NOTICE

    1. State Prosecutors vs. Muro – 236 S 505


    2. People vs. Reanzares – 334 S 624
    3. People vs. Tundag – 342 S 704

    RULE 129 SECTION 4 – JUDICIAL ADMISSIONS

    1. Aguenza vs. Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co. – 271 S 1


    2. Philamgen vs. Sweet Lines, Inc. – 212 S 195
    3. Alano vs. CA – 283 S 269
    4. People vs. Solayao – 262 SCRA 255

    RULE 130 SECTION 1 – OBJECT EVIDENCE

    1. People vs. Manalo – 219 S 656


    2. People vs. Malimit – 264 S 167
    3. People vs. Jumamoy – 221 S 333
    4. People vs. Flores – 328 S 461

    RULE 130 SECTION 3 – BEST EVIDENCE RULE

    1. Borje vs. Sandiganbayan – 125 S 763


    2. Widows and Orphans Association, Inc. vs. CA – 212 S 360
    3. People vs. Tandoy – 192 S 28
    4. Security Bank and Trust Co. vs. Triumphs Lumber and Construction Corp. – 301 S 537

    RULE 130 SECTION 9 – PAROL EVIDENCE RULE

    1. Inciong, Jr. vs. CA – 257 S 578


    2. National Irrigation Administration vs. Gamit – 215 S 436
    3. Gurango vs. IAC – 215 S 332
    4. CKH Industrial and Development Corp. vs. CA – 272 S 333

    RULE 130 SECTION 20 – WITNESSES

    1. People vs. Taneo – 218 S 494


    2. People vs. Balanon – 233 S 679
    3. People vs. Baid – 336 S 656
    4. People vs Lolito Honor – 584 S 547
    5. People vs Solomon Dioneda – 587 S 312

    RULE 130 SECTION 22 – DISQUALIFICATION BY REASON OF MARRIAGE

    1. Ordoño vs. Daquigan – 62 S 270


    2. People vs. Castañeda Jr. – 88 S 562

    RULE 130 SECTION 23 – DEAD MAN STATUTE RULE

    1. Razon vs. IAC – 207 S 234

    RULE 130 SECTION 24 – DISQUALIFICATION BY REASON OF PRIVILEDGED


    COMMUNICATION

    1. US vs. Antipolo – 37 P 726


    2. Lim vs. CA – 214 S 273
    3. Krohn vs. CA – 233 S 146
    4. Fortich vs. CA – 268 S 152

    RULE 130 SECTION 26 – ADMISSIONS OF A PARTY

    1. People vs. Agustin – 240 S 541


    2. Tuason vs. CA – 241 S 695
    3. People vs. Chua Uy – 327 S 335
    4. People vs. Cepeda – 324 S 290

    RULE 130 SECTION 27 – OFFER OF COMPROMISE NOT ADMISSIBLE

    1. People vs. Lase – 219 S 584


    2. Trans Pacific Industrial Supplies, Inc. vs. CA – 235 S 494
    3. People vs. Buemio – 265 S 582
    4. People vs. Amaca – 277 S 215

    RULE 130 SECTION 30 – ADMISSION BY CONSPIRATOR

    1. People vs. Condemena – 23 S 910


    2. People vs. Provo – 37 S 19
    3. People vs. Puesca – 87 S 130

    RULE 130 SECTION 32 – ADMISSION BY SILENCE

    1. US vs. Bay – 27 P 495

    RULE 130 SECTION 33 – CONFESSION

    1. People vs. Agustin – 240 S 541


    2. People vs. Tiozon – 198 S 368
    3. People vs. Tujon – 215 S 559
    4. People vs Ladao – GR 100940-41 November 27, 2001
    5. People vs Encipido – 146 S 478
    6. People vs Janjalani – 639 S 157

    RULE 130 SECTION 36 – HEARSAY RULE

    1. People vs. Valero – 112 S 661


    2. People vs. Damaso - 212 S 547

    2
    3. Agcaoli vs. Molina – 249 S 482
    4. People vs. Brioso – 37 S 336
    RULE 130 SECTION 37 – DYING DECLARATION

    1. People vs. De Joya – 203 S 343


    2. People vs. Dunig – 215 S 469
    3. People vs. Amaca – 277 S 215
    4. US vs. Antipolo – 37 P 726

    RULE 130 SECTION 42 – PART OF THE RES GESTAE

    1. People vs. Tiozon – 198 S 368


    2. People vs. Naranja – 108 P 781
    3. People vs. Palomones – 336 S 80
    4. People vs. Raquel – 265 S 248

    RULE 130 SECTION 44 – ENTRIES IN OFFICIAL RECORDS

    1. People vs. Bernaldez – 294 S 317


    2. People vs. Divina – 221 S 209
    3. People vs. Leones – 117 S 382
    4. People vs. Crisostomo – 160 S 47
    5. Feria vs. CA – 325 S 525

    RULE 130 SECTION 47 – TESTIMONY OR DEPOSITION AT A FORMER


    PROCEEDING

    1. De Leon vs. People – 210 S 151

    RULE 130 SECTION 48 – OPINION RULE

    1. Lim vs. CA – 214 S 273 (supra)


    2. People vs. Galleno – 291 S 762

    RULE 130 SECTION 49 – OPINION OF EXPERT WITNESS

    1. Cebu Shipyard and Engineering Works, Inc. vs. William Lines, Inc. – 306 S 762

    RULE 131 SECTION 1 – BURDEN OF PROOF

    1. Jimenez vs. NLRC – 256 S 84


    2. Mallari vs. CA – 265 S 456

    RULE 131 SECTION 3 – DISPUTABLE PRESUMPTIONS


    1. Lozano vs. De Los Santos – 274 S 45
    2. LRT vs. Natividad – 397 S 75
    3. Del San Transport Lines vs. C&A Const. Inc. – 412 S 524
    4. People vs. De Guzman – 229 S 795
    5. People vs. Navaja – 220 S 624
    6. People vs. Castañeda – 252 S 247
    7. People vs. Simbulan – 214 S 537

    3
    8. People vs. Balluda – 318 S 503

    RULE 132 SECTION 3 – RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF A WITNESS


    (IN RELATION TO THE RIGHT AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION)

    1. People vs. Salveron – 228 S 92


    2. People vs. Malimit – 264 S 167 (supra)

    RULE 132 SECTION 4 – ORDER IN THE EXAMINATION OF AN INDIVIDUAL


    WITNESS

    1. Bachrach Motors Co. Inc. vs. CIR – 86 S 27


    2. People vs. Padero – 226 S 810

    RULE 132 SECTION 10 – LEADING AND MISLEADING QUESTIONS

    1. People vs. Caparas – 111 S 68

    RULE 132 SECTION 13 – HOW WITNESS IMPEACHED BY EVIDENCE OF


    INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS

    1. US vs. Baluyot – 40 P 385


    2. People vs. Relucio – 86 S 227
    3. People vs. Winston De Guzman – 288 S 346

    RULE 132 SECTION 19 – CLASSES OF DOCUMENTS

    1. Joson vs. Baltazar – 194 S 114


    2. Sales vs. CA – 211 S 858
    3. Lucente vs. Evangelista, Jr. – 396 S 627
    4. Yturralde vs. Azurin – 28 S 407

    RULE 132 SECTION 20 – PROOF OF PRIVATE DOCUMENT

    1. Raz vs. IAC – 184 S 720


    2. Ong vs. People – 342 S 372

    4
    RULE 132 SECTION 22 – HOW GENUINENESS OF HANDWRITING PROVED

    1. Layno vs. People – 213 S 686


    2. Jacob vs. CA – 224 S 189
    3. Security Bank and Trust Co. vs. Triumph Lumber and Construction Corp. – 301 S
    537 (supra)
    4. Sy vs. CA – 330 S 550

    RULE 132 SECTION 23 – PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AS EVIDENCE

    1. Dupilas vs. Cabacungan – 36 P 254

    RULE 132 SECTION 34 – OFFER OF EVIDENCE

    1. Catuira vs. CA – 236 S 398


    2. Vda. de Onate vs. CA – 250 S 283
    3. Sy vs. CA – 330 S 550 (supra)
    4. Macasiray vs. People – 291 S 154
    5. Tuason vs. CA – 241 S 695
    6. Candido and Rumbaua vs. CA – 253 S 78
    7. People vs. Barellano – 319 S 567
    8. People vs. Sanchez – 308 S 264

    RULE 133
    SECTION 1 – PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE, HOW DETERMINED
    SECTION 2 – PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT

    1. DBP Pool of Accredited Insurance Companies vs Radio Mindanao Network GR


    147039, Jan 27, 2006
    2. People vs. Mejia – 55 S 453
    3. People vs. Matrimonio – 215 S 613
    4. People vs. Gondora – 265 S 408
    5. People vs. Cabiles – 248 S 207
    6. People vs. Lorenzo – 240 S 624
    7. People vs. Rigodon – 238 S 27
    8. Tin vs. People – 362 S 594

    RULE 133 SECTION 4 – CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, WHEN SUFFICIENT

    1. People vs. Salvame – 270 S 766


    2. People vs. Malimit – 264 S 167 (supra)
    3. People vs. Ramos – 240 S 191
    4. People vs. Adofina – 239 S 67

    RULE 133 SECTION 5 – SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

    1. Fabella vs. CA – 282 S 256


    2. PAL vs. NLRC – 263 S 638
    3. Villaflor vs. CA – 280 S 297
    4. Ang Tibay vs. CIR – 69 P 635

    You might also like