Contract of Law - Notes CLAT Notes
Contract of Law - Notes CLAT Notes
CLAT
Legal Aptitude for CLAT 2020 Preparation
Introduction:
Our day to day life is interspersed with many rights,duties, obligations through which we
interact with society. The laws which lay down rules and provide strength to the
agreement and support of arm of law for their implementation, are adjudged as civil
laws.
The law which provide the procedure to be followed at the time of filing of any case is
the Code of Civil Procedure.
The number of civil laws is innumerable but the most important of these is the law of
contract.
Law of Contract:
Not exhaustive (not limited) and not retrospective Contract are probably the most
familiar legal concept in our society because it is so central to the essence of our
political, economic and social life. The law relating to contract constitute the most
important branch of commercial law.
This is governed by the Indian Contract Act 1872. The contract Act defines contract as an
agreement enforceable by law. All agreements are not enforceable by law and therefore
all agreements are not contracts.
Example: - An agreement to go to see a movie may be a mere agreement not enforceable
by law. Thus all agreements are not contracts.
AGREEMENT:
Every promise and every set of promises forming the consideration for each other is an
agreement. An agreement arises by an “offer or proposal” by one of the parties and the
“acceptance” of such offer by the other. In other sense, in an agreement there is a
promise from both sides.
Example :- A promises to deliver his watch to B and in return B promises to pay a sum of
Rs. 200 to A. There is said to be an agreement between A & B.
PROPOSAL/OFFER - When one person signifies to another his willingness to do, to
abstain from doing anything, with a view of obtaining the assent of that other to such act
or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal.
For example :- A’s willingness to sell his radio set to B for Rs. 500 if B accepts to
purchase the same, amounts to proposal by A for the sale of the radio set.
If a statement is made without any intention to obtain the assent of the other party, it
cannot be termed as proposal.
Generally the offer should be made with an intention to create legal relationship.
Promise in the case of social engagements is generally without an intention to create
legal relationship.
EXAMPLE :-
B accepts A’s proposal by a letter sent by post. The communication of the acceptance is
complete –
As against A when letter is posted.
As against B, when letter is received by A.
REVOCATION OF OFFER & ACCEPTANCE
A proposal may be revoked at any time; before the communication of acceptance is
complete as against the proposer but not afterwards and in case of acceptance, it is at
any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the
acceptor but not after wards.
MODES OF REVOCATION OF OFFER:
1) By communication of notice of revocation by proposer.
2) By lapse of time.
3) By failure of acceptor to fulfill a condition precedent.
4) By death / insanity of proposal.
CONSIDERATION:
Consideration means to do something in return i.e. quid Pro quo under Indian contract
Act.
Consideration is defined as: - when at the desire of the promisor, the promise has done or
abstained from doing or does or abstains from doing or promises to do or abstain
something, such an act or abstinence or promise is called consideration for the promise.
An agreement must be supported by a lawful consideration on both sides.
ESSENTIALS:
1. Consideration to be given at the desire of the promisor.
2. Consideration to be given by the promise or any other person.
3. Consideration may be past, present or future.
4. There should be some act, abstinence or promise by the promise which constitutes
consideration for the promise.
A executed an agreement with B who was a minor age 17 years at the time of execution
of agreement. After attaining majority, the erstwhile minor cannot ratify the agreement.
Past Consideration means that the consideration for any promise was given earlier and the
promise is made thereafter.
Example:- I request you to find my lost dog. After you have done the same, if I promise to
pay you Rs. 100 for that, it is a case of past consideration under this the act recognizes
only such consideration which has been given at the desire of the promisor, rather than
voluntarily.
Executed or Present Consideration – when one the parties to the contract has
performed his part of the promise, which constitutes the consideration for the promise
by the other side. In other words consideration is provided simultaneously along with
the making of the contract.
Executory or Future Consideration - When one person makes a promise in exchange for
the promise by the other side, the performance of the obligation by each side to be
made subrequest to the making of the contract, the consideration is known as
executory.
For example: A agrees to supply certain goods to B and B agrees to pay for them on a
future date, this is a case of executory consideration.
WHO ARE COMPETENT TO CONTRACT
Every person is competent to contract who is of the age of majority according to the law
of land of which he is a subject and who has not been disqualified from entering into a
contract is competent to contract.
Therefore the following persons are parties incompetent to contract :-
1. A minor i.e. a person below the age of 18 years.
2. A person of unsound mind or insane.
3. A person disqualified by any law to contract.
Thus an agreement with a minor is absolutely void.
AGREEMENT WITHOUT CONSIDERATION AS VOID
Exceptions:
1) Natural love and affection.
2) Compensation for past voluntary services.
3) Promise to pay time barred debt.
In a very popular case, Mohiri Bibee in Dharmodas Ghose (ILR 1903) 30 cal 539 a minor
mortgaged his house in favour of a money lender and received certain amount from him.
The privy council held that the money lender is not entitled to get the money back which
was advanced to a minor. This is because only a person capable of entering into a
agreement can make a contract.
MINOR AND RULE OF ESTOPPEL
Further a situation may arise where a minor has declared or intentionally caused or
permitted another person to believe him to be a person who has
attained the age of majority upon such belief, if the money lender advances some money
to the minor, can the minor be held liable to pay? The Mohiri Bibee case clearly ruled out
that the rule of estoppels does not apply against minor. It means a minor cannot be held
liable to repay a loan even if he has procured it by misrepresenting him as a major
person.
MINOR AND RULE OF RESTITUTION
Again a question arises as to the rule of restitution applying against a minor. Restitution
means to restore or return the benefit received by a minor under an agreement. A minor
is not liable to restore the benefits received under a void contract except under certain
cases.
A minor who has obtained money or goods by misrepresenting him to be major, can be
compelled to restore the benefit to the extent, he or his estate has benefited. If some
benefit of permanent nature has been accrued to him, he has to restore it.
Example:- A minor has to restore a car or a house purchased from a loan amount. But he
cannot be forced to repay any money used by him for temporary employment e.g. on
eating, drinking, movies etc. A minor’s liability for necessaries supplied to him for his
living e.g. food cloth, lodging, medicine and health care etc under an agreement can be
enforced against his property.
Therefore, if a minor meets an accident and a person expends money on his hospital
expenses, he would be reimbursed from minor’s property.A minor’s parents are out of
station. His neighbor lends him money to buy food and clothes for himself his claim of
repayment would lie against minor’s property.
What is a sound mind for the purposes of contracting:- A person is said to be of sound
mind for the purpose of making a contract, if at the time when he makes it, he is capable
of understanding it and of forming a rational judgment as to its effect upon his interests.
A person who is usually of unsound mind out occasionally of sound mind may make a
contract when he is of sound mind.
A person who is usually of sound mind but occasionally of unsound mind may not make a
contract when he is of unsound mind.
Example: A patient in a lunatic asylum, who is at intervals, of sound mind may contract
during intervals.
A person, who is delirious from fever or who is so drunk that he cannot understand the
terms of a contract or form a rational judgments as to its effect on his interests cannot
contract whilst such delirium or drunkenness lasts.
CONSENT DEFINED:
Two or more persons are said to be consented when they agree upon the same thing in
the same sense.
FREE CONSENT
Consent is said to be free when it is not caused by coercion, undue-influence, fraud,
misrepresentation and mistake.
COERCION:
Coercion is the committing or threatening to commit any act forbidden by the Indian
Penal code or the unlawful detaining, or threatening to detain any property, to the
prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into
an agreement.
For example : - A threatens to shoot B is B does not agree to sell his property to A at a
stated price. B’s consent in this case has been obtained by coercion.
UNDUE INFLUENCE
Undue influence takes place where two persons stand in such a relation that one party is
in a position to dominate the will of the other. When such person uses his position to
obtain an unfair advantage over the other, any agreement entered into is vitiated by
undue influence a person can be said to dominate the will of other or able to exercise
undue influence over the other if –
1. He has real or apparent authority over the other or he stands in a fiduciary relation with
him and
2. He makes a contract with a person whose mental capacity is temporarily or
permanently affected due to old age, illness or mental or bodily distress.
Example : Mr A is heavily indebted to Mr. B the money lender of the village. B gets on
agreement signed by A in which he sells all his land to B at a price much below, say one-
fourth of the existing market price of the land can A challenge the agreement on the
ground of being induced by undue influence? The answer is yes. It lies upon B to prove
that the contract was not induced by influence.
Fraud:
Fraud means and includes any of the following acts committed by a party to a contract,
or with his connivance, or by his to enter into the contract :-
1. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is not true, by one who does not believe it to be
true.
2. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact.
3. A promise made without any intention of performing it.
4. Any other act failed to deceive.
5. Any such act or omission as the law specially declares to be fraudulent. Mere silence
as to facts likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not fraud,
except in two cases –
a) where there is a duty to speak.
b) where silence is equivalent to speech.
For example: B says to A – if you do not deny it, I shall assumes that the horse is sound”.
A says nothing mere A’s silence is equivalent to speech and if the horse is found
unsound, he would be guilty of fraud.
MISREPRESENTATION
Misrepresentation means misstatements or unwarranted statements which are not true
though the person believes it to be true. The statement believes it to be true. Whereas,
‘fraud’ is also called a wildful misrepresentation where makes of the statement known
and believes it not to be true.
VOIDABILITY
In contracts, voidable is a term typically used with respect to a contract that is valid and
binding unless avoided or declared void by a party to the contract who is legitimately
exercising a power to avoid the contractual obligations.
MISTAKE
Mistake as to matter of fact:-
1. Where both the parties to an agreement are under a mistake as to a matter of that
essential to the agreement, the agreement is void.
Example:- A agrees to buy from B a certain horse. It turns out that the horse was dead at
the time of the bargain, though neither party was aware of the fact. The agreement is
void.
1. A contract is not voidable merely because it was caused by one of the parties to it
being under a mistake as to a matter of fact. In other words if any one party is under
mistake as to a matter of fact, then that would be considered as a valid contract.
EFFECT OF MISTAKES AS TO LAW
A contract is not voidable because it was caused by a mistake as to any law in force in
(India), but a mistake as to a law not in force in (India) has the same effect as a mistake
of fact.
Example :- A and B make a contract grounded on the erroneous belief that a particular
debt is barred by the Indian law of limitation, the contract is not voidable.
1. What consideration and objects are lawful and what not - The consideration or object
of an agreement is lawful unless
- it is forbidden by law, or
- is of such a nature that, if permitted, it would defeat the provisions of any law, or is
fraudulent or
- involves or implies injury to the person or property of another
- or the court regards it as immoral or opposed to public policy.
CONTINGENT CONTRACTS
A contingent contract is a contract to do or not to do something, if some event, collateral
to such contract, does not happen
For example :- A contracts to pay to B Rs. 10000 if B’s horse is burnt. This is a contingent
contract.
Previous
Upgrade (/Subscription?utm_medium=website&utm_source=upgrade_btn_cnt_page_ftr&utm_campaign=subscription_link)
Next
Up next >
(https://edurev.in/studytube/Acceptance-Contract-of-Law/9ba2d9eb-e0be-409f-bb6d-f04f272ac6d8_v?courseId=-1)
Acceptance - Contract of Law (https://edurev.in/studytube/Acceptance-Contract-of-Law/9ba2d9eb-e0be-409f-bb6d-
f04f272ac6d8_v?courseId=-1)
Video | 16:01 min
< Previous
(https://edurev.in/course/quiz/7878_Legal-Reasoning-Test-2/a26839c9-20d9-432b-8355-de69d35b3586?courseId=7878)
Legal Reasoning Test-2 (https://edurev.in/course/quiz/7878_Legal-Reasoning-Test-2/a26839c9-20d9-432b-8355-
de69d35b3586?courseId=7878)
Test | 24 ques | 20 min
Content Details
Views: 45.1K
Rating: 4.59 (256)
Sep 28, 2017
CLAT (/search/CLAT)
Download
Share with a friend
Description
Contract of Law - Notes notes for CLAT is made by best teachers who have written some of the best books of CLAT. It has gotten 45062
views and also has 4.59 rating. You can download Free Contract of Law - Notes pdf from EduRev by using search above. You can also
find Contract of Law - Notes ppt and other CLAT slides as well. If you want Contract of Law - Notes Tests & Videos, you can search for
the same too. CLAT Contract of Law - Notes Summary and Exercise are very important for perfect preparation. You can see some
Contract of Law - Notes sample questions with examples at the bottom of this page. Complete Contract of Law - Notes chapter
(including extra questions, long questions, short questions, mcq) can be found on EduRev, you can check out CLAT lecture & lessons
summary in the same course for CLAT Syllabus. EduRev is like a wikipedia just for education and the Contract of Law - Notes images
and diagram are even better than Byjus! Do check out the sample questions of Contract of Law - Notes for CLAT, the answers and
examples explain the meaning of chapter in the best manner. This is your solution of Contract of Law - Notes search giving you solved
answers for the same. To Study Contract of Law - Notes for CLAT this is your one stop solution.