Commonwealth Contributions To The British Diet: Conclusion
Commonwealth Contributions To The British Diet: Conclusion
Commonwealth Contributions To The British Diet: Conclusion
REFEREXCES
Board of Trade (1949).Annual Statement, 1947, Compared with the Years 1943-1946, Trade of the
United Kingdom, with British Countries and Foreign Countries. London: H.M. Stationery Office.
Customs and Excise (1949). Accounts Relating to Trade and Navigation of the United Kingdom. London:
H.M. Stationery Office.
By A. P. VAN DER POST(Senior Trade Commissioner for the Union of South Africa in
the United Kingdom), South Africa House, Trafalgar Square, London, W.C. 2
The Union of South Africa can make only a limited contribution to the food require-
ments of the United Kingdom and that to a large extent only of luxury or semi-luxury
articles of food. T o appreciate the reason for this it is well briefly to examine the geo-
physical background of South African farming.
Food production
It may be objected that what has been said thus far does not answer the main question
which we have been asked to answer to-day, namely, what contribution the Union of
South Africa can make to the British diet. That superficially is the case-so far I have
not indicated what foodstuffs the Union can supply and what foodstuffs it cannot offer
to the British housewife; but what has been said will help to answer any questions, as
to why or why not, which may emerge from what is to follow on food production in
the Union.
Mutton. The Union, it should be evident from the foregoing, is for the greater part
a pastoral country under a system of very extensive pastoralism. Its most important
farming product is fine merino wool-merino be it noted-sheep skins and also cattle
hides; other important animal products are mohair, goat skins, and Persian lambskins.
Only a very small portion of these products is retained in the Union, the greater part
being exported. Merino wool is the Union’s principal export commodity of farming,
having yielded in 1948 over ~30,000,000 of income to farmers.
We emphasize the word merino, because the merino sheep provides the bulk of the
Union’s mutton, but mutton which is not suitable for export. The British types of
sheep, all mutton, are hardly to be found in the country, which, but for very limited
areas, is climatically not suited to them. Before the second great war the Union did
export a small-relatively to British requirements negligible-quantity of lamb. To-day
even that small quantity is required within the Union because of the heavy decline in
NIV I 5
66 CONFERENCE
PROCEEDINGS 1950
numbers of merino sheep as a result of recurrent severe droughts. Mutton and lamb,
therefore, the Union cannot supply.
Beef. This, too, the Union unfortunately cannot ship. I n the thirties, it did export to
the United Kingdom about 40,000 quarters annually, but that quantity was negligible
in relation to British requirements and it is doubtful whether that small export trade
will ever again be resumed. The Union is not a natural beef-producing country-it
lacks the natural vegetation, such as the Argentine pampas enjoy, upon which beef
cattle can be fattened. Some excellent beef cattle are to be found in South Africa, but
they have in the main to be fattened on maize and lucerne and are hardly sufficient in
number to meet the local demand for first-grade beef. The greater part of the country
can support only a type of cattle which is greatly inferior-as a beef-producer-to the
beef type proper, and for several years before slaughter is used as a draft-animal.
Dairy produce. It would seem obvious from what has been said so far about the
country’s climate that butter and cheese also are not available for supply to the United
Kingdom. Before the war, the Union did ship annually about 6000 tons butter and some
cheese, but these were produced under relatively very extensive conditions of farming.
Although the butter-to confine my remarks to butter-was of good quality it could
not compare with, for example, the New Zealand product and ranked below the
Australian. This was due not to lack of efficiency on the part of the creameries, but to
extensive conditions which permitted the cream to be collected only once or twice
weekly. Top-grade butter, produced under, say, ideal conditions is not sufficient to
supply all the Union’s requirements, which have, therefore, partly to be met from butter
produced under the conditions described, quite suitable for the table, but not of the
same high quality as New Zealand butter. Owing both to the ravages of drought and to
increased local demand, the Union no longer has a surplus for export-in fact has taken
to the productionof margarine to supply the increasing wants of the lower-income groups.
Cereals. The union is an importer of wheat, but before the war used to be an exporter
of maize, of which it shipped considerable quantities to the United Kingdom. Ground
maize, or Indian corn, generally called mielies (mealies) in South Africa, makes a very
popular porridge and forms the staple diet of the natives. Maize and meal shipped to
Britain were used mainly in industry (e.g. the starch mills) and as animal feed. It is not
seen on the British breakfast table except as ‘corn flakes’. For the past 8 years approxi-
mately the Union has not shipped any mealies to Britain, partly because of a great
increase in local demand, partly because of poor crops as a result of drought. The Union
Department of Agriculture is investigating the suitability of hybrid maize for production
in the Union. Farmers have not yet taken to hybrid maize, but in view of its great
success in the United States, there would appear to be no reason why ultimately it
should not also be in general use in the Union. When that day arrives, the Union is
bound again to have a big surplus available for export.
T o summarize, although the Union cannot hope to equal the record of certain other
countries in the supply of large quantities of basic foodstuffs to the United Kingdom, it
nevertheless can make a substantial contribution, partly in basic, partly in semi-
luxury, foodstuffs to give variety to the British diet.
The British Caribbean area is here regarded as consisting of Jamaica, Trinidad and
Tobago, Barbados, the Leeward and Windward Islands, British Guiana and British
Honduras. Although this area contributes to the British diet in many ways, for
example by its exports of bananas, cocoa, citrus fruits, coconuts and, more recently, of
tinned fruit juices and tomatoes, its chief contribution is sugar; no small quantity of
rum obtained by the fermentation of molasses is also sent from the West Indies.
The value to this country of the sugar production of the West Indies and other
Commonwealth countries and colonies has recently been brought home to us by the
diminution in our sugar ration owing to our inability to buy very much sugar from
dollar countries such as Cuba. Of the total sugar intake of this country in 1948,
namely, 2,086,576tons, hard currency areas contributed 1,083,121tons. It will there-
fore be to our advantage at this time of economic difficulty to increase our empire
production of sugar so far as agreements with United States territories permit.
The value of sugar in nutrition has recently been emphasized by work carried out in
America under the aegis of the Sugar Research Foundation (1949). For instance, Mack
(1948)found, after large-scale experiments, that children given extra calories in the
form of sugar attained a better skeletal development and general physique than others
not so treated. Sugar grown either as beet or cane is certainly the most efficient food
crop, giving rise to more calories/acre than any other.