The document discusses ethics and morality, defining them and explaining their differences. It outlines key concepts in morality like the notions of good and evil, and how morality relates to human fulfillment and society. It also discusses different approaches to morality between cultures.
The document discusses ethics and morality, defining them and explaining their differences. It outlines key concepts in morality like the notions of good and evil, and how morality relates to human fulfillment and society. It also discusses different approaches to morality between cultures.
The document discusses ethics and morality, defining them and explaining their differences. It outlines key concepts in morality like the notions of good and evil, and how morality relates to human fulfillment and society. It also discusses different approaches to morality between cultures.
The document discusses ethics and morality, defining them and explaining their differences. It outlines key concepts in morality like the notions of good and evil, and how morality relates to human fulfillment and society. It also discusses different approaches to morality between cultures.
Provides a theoretical knowledge of the morality of human acts Provides bases of right or wrong and good or bad actions. Ethics: Moral philosophy It does not necessarily follow that man does what he knows. Ethics does not actually guarantee that man will be moral. One can be moral when one applies ethics (theory). Morality: Moral Theology • The praxis (practice) of the ethics (theory) • Properly called applied ethics • Actualizes the theory into a real action • The doing of ethics What does “moral” mean?
(Moral: Latin Mores:
customs, habitual ways of doing things) Customary ways of doing things can, of course, be either right or wrong, good or evil.
When we say that
something is “moral” we generally mean that it is “good”. In morality, the fundamental value is always the human person and the person in relationship with society. . We belong to society and the human community by the very nature of our birth; thus, personal morality can never be divorced from our responsibilities as members of that society Since customs, practices, habitual ways of doing things vary from culture to culture, it can be expected that there will be varying approaches to morality. The major issue in these varying approaches to morality is that people have different views of what is good or evil. Good or Evil •Every human person has an innate tendency to seek his or her fulfilment and perfection. The mere fact of being alive and being human means that one has purpose, one has goals, one seeks meaning in life. Also it means that one has needs and desires pursuant to keeping oneself alive and seeking one’s own fulfillment. This fulfilment, or perfection, we call “the good”.
Hence, we can state another fundamental truth:
Anything contributing to the full actualization of human potential and the proper development of the human person is good or moral. Those who believe in God see and understand God as the final end and purpose of human life, the supreme good. Just as anything that contributes to the proper growth and development of the human person is good, so anything that frustrates or acts against this proper growth and development is considered to be evil. What are some of the things that frustrate human life and development, and which everyone would therefore consider evil? Here is a partial list: Death, suffering, pain, disability, Deprivation of freedom, Discrimination that deprives one of opportunity to improve oneself, Deprivation of worth and self-esteem.
We call these pre- moral evils ( that is, evils in the
objective sense before any moral slant has been added). Human beings may be deprived of what they need for their growth and development as persons in different ways. One way that pre-moral evil may be caused is by natural disaster such as earthquakes, floods, epidemics, accidents and in general, things which are outside of human control.
We call such evils “physical evils”. But as
we know quite well, most of the evil in the world does not occur in this way. Most evil in the world is brought on by the free, deliberate and unjustified actions of human beings.
• We call such evils “moral evils”. And so, moral
evils occur when we voluntarily and deliberately become involved in the spread of pre-moral evil. SOME IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS 1. Morality has to do with who and what we are as human beings and with our legitimate development as persons. SOME IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS 2. Authority does not create morality. SOME IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS 3. Immoral and illegal are not the same thing. Two presuppositions in Moral Theology 1. Man possesses freedom of will • Men experience themselves not merely as instruments in the hands of higher forces, but as creative agents. • Able to choose among alternatives • Capable of self-determination 2. Man is accountable to an ultimate value or authority • From the commitment to this ultimate value, human life receives its ultimate meaning • The existence of God and man’s accountability to an ultimate value are not two separate presuppositions Division of Moral Theology General Morals • Treats the general presuppositions of the moral act and its qualities that it may contribute to human’s final goal • Why the action has to be done? • Ethics of being Special Morals • Treats the human action • What action has to be done? • Ethics of doing 2 Subdivisions of Special Morals • Man’s responsibility in the religious realm: God
•Man’s responsibility towards the
created world: neighbor & creation BASES OF MORAL THEOLOGY •Divine Revelation (Christian Faith) OLD TESTAMENT NEW TESTAMENT TRADITION (Church Teachings)
•Reason (human intelligence)
What is the Challenge then to our Christian moral living? Jesus’ teachings about love have two dimensions:
Vertical (pointing to God)
Horizontal (pointing to others) Faith in God alone is not enough in order to live a good life. We must also love our neighbor. On The Catholic Faith
The Catholic Faith teaches that “wrong is wrong,
even if everyone is doing it.” And that “right is right, even though no one else is doing it.”