This document appears to be a student paper analyzing the 2010 film "Unthinkable" and discussing the moral dilemma of torture. The paper explores whether the ends ever justify the means through the lens of the film. It discusses utilitarian perspectives on maximizing benefits to society through torture, as well as moral reservations about torture. The effectiveness of torture is also questioned. The student concludes that once a country justifies torture, it loses moral authority to condemn torture elsewhere. Standard moral dilemmas involving greater harm are also addressed. A second section discusses how studying ethics has impacted the student as a thinking person and human being by helping them think more critically and consider moral questions.
This document appears to be a student paper analyzing the 2010 film "Unthinkable" and discussing the moral dilemma of torture. The paper explores whether the ends ever justify the means through the lens of the film. It discusses utilitarian perspectives on maximizing benefits to society through torture, as well as moral reservations about torture. The effectiveness of torture is also questioned. The student concludes that once a country justifies torture, it loses moral authority to condemn torture elsewhere. Standard moral dilemmas involving greater harm are also addressed. A second section discusses how studying ethics has impacted the student as a thinking person and human being by helping them think more critically and consider moral questions.
This document appears to be a student paper analyzing the 2010 film "Unthinkable" and discussing the moral dilemma of torture. The paper explores whether the ends ever justify the means through the lens of the film. It discusses utilitarian perspectives on maximizing benefits to society through torture, as well as moral reservations about torture. The effectiveness of torture is also questioned. The student concludes that once a country justifies torture, it loses moral authority to condemn torture elsewhere. Standard moral dilemmas involving greater harm are also addressed. A second section discusses how studying ethics has impacted the student as a thinking person and human being by helping them think more critically and consider moral questions.
This document appears to be a student paper analyzing the 2010 film "Unthinkable" and discussing the moral dilemma of torture. The paper explores whether the ends ever justify the means through the lens of the film. It discusses utilitarian perspectives on maximizing benefits to society through torture, as well as moral reservations about torture. The effectiveness of torture is also questioned. The student concludes that once a country justifies torture, it loses moral authority to condemn torture elsewhere. Standard moral dilemmas involving greater harm are also addressed. A second section discusses how studying ethics has impacted the student as a thinking person and human being by helping them think more critically and consider moral questions.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 17
Republic of the Philippines
Bulacan State University
Guinhawa, City of Malolos, Bulacan College of Criminal Justice Education
ETHIC 101 S Quarantine Requirements
In Final Fulfillment of the unit requirements in Ethics 101
Lacbayan, Ma. Victoria C.
Bachelor of Science in Legal Management 1-C Mr. Sherwin M. Pariñas, PhD.
The Unthinkable makes it thinkable
The movie’s storyline stages a generic situation of counterterrorism that involves the moral dilemma of choosing between saving countless lives from an imminent attack on one hand and physically abusing an individual in possession of relevant information on the other. This scenario is known as “the ticking bomb situation”. In this situation described earlier, thousands of lives can be saved by an immoral act against one. The fact that we have to inflict harm to a person in our direct continuity makes it more personal than the harm that might befall thousands of innocent, but at the same time unknown citizens. It is by avoiding the moral dilemma from becoming personal that we can make decisions which we otherwise might not have made. In the movie, We can see these processes unfold. The moral dilemma is kept impersonal by bringing in an anonymous outsider to inflict the torture to the suspected terrorist instead of inflicting physical violence itself. But the more the FBI agent starts to see the terrorist as a human being, the harder it becomes to condone the immoral behavior of the interrogator. In description, Do the ends ever justify the means? Unthinkable makes it clear that the pain and possible killing of one man is surpass by the saving of the millions of innocent lives that hang in the balance. If the ends apparently justify the means, then the means become the vehicle for becoming those we despise. This underscores the dilemma when How far will H and Brody go to save the innocent? The counterterrorist on one side see no difference between soldiers and civilians. Applying a consequentialist approach to the decision whether or not to torture an individual, such logic evaluates possible actions only in terms of their consequences without moral factors. In addition, the legalization of torture could be essential in regulating and monitoring a practice that is used despite its prohibition. While in a utilitarian perspective, torturing an individual still maximizes the benefits for the society. So without any moral consideration, in order to save group of people, you could keep on torturing and killing up to almost of its whole population. It seems that the probability of legalizing torture is not only subjected to moral reserves but also to doubts on its effectiveness and a vast array of subjective factors that would make torture an improper solution even in a worst-case scenario such as the one shown in “Unthinkable”. In the movie, there is evidence beyond reasonable doubt that the terrorist withholding true information of quick importance affecting a significantly number of people, and that person would consider the end, protecting that great number of uninvolved people. This falls within equal standard ethical dilemmas of greater good or least harm. In order to put morality into society, one of the ways is by putting its values into literary works. Through the movie, the dilemma between rationality and conscience is reflected, also shows how important the application of Utilitarianism on that situation. It left this viewer more interested in calculating a score for torture than debating whether it was justified. the terrorist has no good, let alone decisive, justificatory moral reason for murdering them. In general, it can consider torture both wrong in principle and often considered to be of little use compared with benefits gained, rapidly being over-used. Through the development of knowledge, morality can no longer be a basic consideration to define the truth. Torture is not a proper instrument of the State. Once a country justifies torture, it then loses any moral authority to condemn torture. Here, the aim is to prevent greater harm so it moves into a standard moral dilemma. At Last, Standard moral dilemmas are normally presented in terms where one knows one's action will be effective so the decision is whether to execute one unethical act to prevent greater harm. Here, we do not know it will be effective.
How Ethics changed my life as a human being and as a thinking person?
Ethics by its meaning is a branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct. It is derived from the Greek word: “ethos” which means “characteristic way of acting”. Thus, ethics studies the characteristics of behavior of man as endowed reason and free will. Ethics seeks to resolve questions of human morality by defining concepts such as good and evil, right and wrong, virtue and vice, justice and crime. Ideal human behavior and ideal ways of being. It let me meant having the freedom to exercise my autonomy or self-determination, not being used as a means to an end, thus being treated with dignity and having the capability to think rationally. It gives me understand, analyze, and distinguish matters of right and wrong, admirable as they related to the well-being of a person and the relationships among sentient beings like me. Base on my observation with the discussions we have on ethics. It is an active process rather than a static condition, Why? Well When people are doing ethics. They need to support their beliefs and assertions with sound reasoning. They ought to justify their positions through logical and continuous thinking. It helps me to think out of the box, have the sense of rationality. Expand our avenue of thinking. It teaches how to examine human nature and what is need for us to move toward well- being. Achieve self-direction, understand that we do not consist with a self at all. As contrasted with ethics, morals are specific beliefs, behaviors and ways of being derive from doing ethics. People consider matters of ethics, they usually are considering matters about freedom regarding personal choices, one’s obligations to other sentient or judgments about human character. According to Donahue (1996), In the world today, “We are in the thores of a giant ethical leap that is essentially embracing all of humankind. Ethical directives for me are not always clearly evident, and us people sometimes disagree what is right and wrong. We lead to believe that ethics can be just based merely on personal opinions. However, if we enter the worldwide- view about ethics, we must make more practice ethics based simply on our personal opinions or unexamined beliefs that are proposed by other people. It is important for us to have a basic understanding of the concepts and theories that have been used in studying ethics so that we can determine and analyze ethical issues and dilemmas that are relevant to the social cancers of our society. Sometimes I just satisfied on “We all live with Love & Strife “, I’m always longing for love and it thinks to be our main reason why we are living. But at some point, that love turns into strife especially if we don’t take back the love that we want, ending us up a little bit angrier. We always feel shallow and wants for a turn in the cycle. That’s why I seek for change cause it’s only permanence in this world. And we should make our own Histority by creating that metaphysical change to create a legacy for our lives. Often time, breaking the rules I’ve used to, makes me like I’m living my own reality as well. Cause reality is quiet exhausting, right? We’re all want to exile from it. But I learnt from ethics is we’re being/nothing, we, as a Being is Never- less & Never-will. What does it mean? We as a being is such nothing but it doesn’t mean that we can do all things we want without considering ethically. Though we must be Never-less for our past and Never-will for our future, without any accessory from that two, We should all only focus on building our present lives not with what we want but what ethics want to deliver our lives. Even we have a limited time to discussed the whole point of studying ethics, still our professor leaves his lecture a reason for me why we should need ethics. First reason is that we may get more light for our daily problems. We often encounter moral dilemma in our life. Within such situation, one must decide because not deciding would mean avoiding responsibility and it would be morally wrong. Ethics will guide us in those situations, play an important role to guide our decision in our daily problems. Second, is that it makes clearer to us why one act is better than another. It is only through ethics we can compare two acts or persons why one is good and is bad. Third, is “Morality is the best way of living”. Since our professor was a former seminarist, he also provide some reflective point about the Fourth reason why we need ethics is that morality helps us to see what are the prevalent sins and moral dangers of our day and thus arouse us to put the weight of our blame and praise where they are needed. The purpose of ethics was explicit by our prof. at the beginning. The goal of a theory of ethics was to determine what is good, both for the individual and for the society. As per discussed based our reading materials. For the Greeks, Ethics was to develop virtuous and moral character. Their ancient philosophy believes in “cosmocentrism” such that everything is from the” cosmo or universe”. It is merely based on our sense accords to Thales, Urstoff states that the origin of things is apeiron or invisible, while Anaximander determined life as “indeterminate boundless”. We also have Ethics from western culture involves theological perspective like the ethics proposed by St. Augustine, St. Thomas Aquinas, and other religious ethical philosophers tends to be based on a belief in confluence and human flaws that require and intermediary to transcend these imperfections. They believe that such character would make one know the right thing to do and live the right way of life. Later, modern philosophers like Hobbes, Hume and Kant have taken different positions in defining what is good, on how to deal with conflicting priorities of individuals versus the whole, over the universality of ethical principles versus “situation ethics” in which what is right depends upon the circumstances rather than on some general law and over whether goodness is determined by the results of the action or the means by results are achieved by (relativism, universalism, Kantianism). Ethical determinations are applied through the use by formal theories and code of conduct that we use to develop for professions and religions. Utilitarianism makes me emphasizes the consequences of my actions in about achieving the most good for the people that may be affected by my action. Every action we take includes consequentialism which the determine of our action’s good is based on its effect. Cultural relativism on the other hand is ethical theory that our moral evaluation is rooted in and cannot be separated from the experience be what is wrong with another culture may not be so in another. There’s some belief that it is acceptable for ethics and morality to differ among persons or societies and that be so called “relativism” that might refer to contextual appreciation. Ethics also let me perceived it from different scopes in our society as: “Man and fellow man”. It deals with the “oughts” or “shoulds” of human existence in relation to others. “Man and his society”. Ethics is also a study of man, as a member of moral community. It investigates how man should relate to his community and vice versa. It prescribes how man should best contribute to the welfare of his community and how the community should best foster his personal growth and improvement. “Man and other Sentient Being”. Ethics also deals with the relationship between human beings and other being. The main concern here is about proper attitude toward the sentient being that is vulnerable and is it ethical to use them for the advancement of human knowledge. “Man and his natural environment”. Deals with how we treat our natural environment. It tries to provide rational basis for environmental protection in view of the duty to respect the right of the future members of the community. Often times, Ethics and Morality got mis conceptualize, The 3 months we had with ethics makes to clarify things line with what we have discussed for ethics. Ethics is the science of the morality of human acts. It is the study of the behavior of man as moral being, who can distinguish between right and wrong, good and bad., while Morality is originated from Latin word: “moralitas” which means “manner or proper behavior. It is referred to a code of conduct, by which human beings regulate their lives. From the root word of ethics and morality, it can be concluded that both are referring to the same thing or the same meaning. The study of ethics should also lead one to develop skills in articulating your own values, to provide others with reasons for your actions and give you the means of questioning the values of others. Ever heard of Cultural, Social, Aesthetic, & Ethical Norm? These are norms of behavior that everyone should follow but for once, not all of these can be ethically good or bad, it has a different definition from each other. It’s still on how you apply these norms in living ethically. Our society might fall into chaos if we accept that each of us could pick and choose what the right thing to do is. There is nothing wrong with pursuing one’s own interests. However, an ethical person must be willing at least sometimes to place the interests of others ahead of self- interest, because of our responsibility to a civil society. Most of us would agree that it is ethics in practice that makes sense, just having it carefully outlined and re-outlined in books may not serve the purpose. Whether a group or a people need to abide by ethics or rule of law, engage themselves in fair practices and competition, all of which will benefit all of us consumer, the society and organization. Ethics is a code of conduct of all rational being in relation to other rational beings, non- rational beings and environment. It regulates human behavior on how to relate properly with the environment around us. It is all about the choices we make. We constantly face choices that affect the quality of our lives. We are aware that choices have consequences, both for ourselves and others. We are aware of the responsibility we have for our actions. We need to be ethical because it defines who we are individually and as a society. A person that is believed to be driven by moral values is respected in the society. Ethics also uniting people and leadership. This goes a long way in aligning behaviors within the society towards achievement of one common goal or mission. It also improved decision making, A man’s destiny is the sum of all the decisions that he/she takes in course of his life. It also securing the society. Often ethics succeeds law in safeguarding the society. Ethics tries to create a sense of right and wrong in the organizations and often when the law fails, it is the ethics that may stop organizations from harming the society or environment. It let us comprehend our real selves. Ethics are one’s personal understanding of duality and one’s responses to duality in context with the timeless, infinite, unchanging self. Being ethical leads to grasp the nature of morality, which is a social convention. Without ethical behavior in particular, one cannot relate in a reasonable way to yourself nor to others. With all is said and done. Ethics is inescapable. It is difficult, if not impossible, to imagine a society in which there are no codes of conduct, ways of assessing what is desirable or healthy and undesirable or unhealthy. In studying this, chances are you will have no opportunity to carefully reflect on the values that shape our lives, no chance to think about whether the values in your society are wise or foolish, no chance to expand your awareness of the values of other persons. Conclusively, from all the points we’ve discussed with Ethics. We may get some reflective points. Life is a constant learning, we are all “Sopros” (thinking being) in our own way. Breaking the routine makes us think. The cycle rotates at “Espacio, temporal, change”. We exist to co-exist”. Ethics defines what is good and bad. There are standards that we can use as basis for moral judgment of our acts. The acts that deserve moral judgment is only human act, not act of man. Kant said that “We are duty bound, no exception”, that we should stand our actions in life to be ethical not just because it is our obligation to be ethical but it is more so of our duty we can’t resist, To have the life is something to be ethical. Ethics and daily life are inseparable. By knowing it, we can direct our lives in a right and good manner. The purpose of behaving ethically is happiness. In this case, every one of us who conducts himself ethically is a happy person. Beyond that, behaving ethically can create harmonious relationship and consequently peaceful life by applying Ataraxia “avoidance of trouble in mind” in our lives. The more we contend our minds to be clear yet appease, The more we can be reflective and wise in making decisions and actions. As per Satre said “We are the tailor of our fate”. We make our own destiny, we have our living based on how we receive the world around us and we have our life based on how we give and do it. Even without legal directives, religion or norms for based on such reason, but as long as we do not dismiss ethics from our daily life? We must be guided by it. We must subscribe to it. We are guided in decision making and our behavior. When we are encountering many problems, at least, we know how to deal with the problems and how to behave in a certain situation. It is a fact that in some circumstances, we often do not need intellectuality to have a successful life, only ethics will be. When Pandemic wake me up to ends The pandemic is deeply affecting life around the globe. Even though the current crisis can bring with its opportunities for personal growth and family cohesion, disadvantages may outweigh these benefits. Anxiety, lack of socialization and the real main threat here is the insurgent ethical issues raise by this particularly challenging time. We have all felt the devastating effects of the pandemic on our families and communities. It is unequivocal that this pandemic has led to a near total disruption of our social fabric. This catastrophe has been unprecedented in its impact, leaving no aspect of life affected from its arrival. And with such a large crisis comes even larger, although, difficult questions to answer. Questions that tug at the ethical conflicts, the crisis has brought to the forefront. In the light of this pandemic, various ethical issues arise as of the following: The greatest ethical challenge posed by a pandemic that I have seen is how to respect commitments to social justice in the face of the overwhelming and entrenched inequalities. A major issue on how the resources should be allocated, both before and during the pandemic, between the needs of the people. Such inequalities result from efforts to control this virus that disproportionately burden poor countries and benefit wealthy ones which attesting the Social justice itself. As on telecasted on the news, Most of our hospitals are already fully-occupied, A related, more specific question is whether it is appropriate to alter the standards for approval of essential products for a pandemic because of the pressing public need? Does all the patient’s lives will be importantly cared or the welfare is just sanctioning for the chosen ones? Another ethical concern is the obligations of health-care workers during a pandemic and the obligations of society to them in return. Their acceptance of this risk in the execution of their duties would create reciprocal duties on the part of the community they requested to stay at home to them. Recently, major group of medical frontliners decries “medical break” due to their exhaustion, sacrifice and incomparable effort to fulfill their duties. They’re all tired, weakened and afraid with the threat of COVID, but still rather choose to continue their pledge oath. But the questions is “How long they can willingly stand for their duties without being forced to do it? “How long they can fight their dilemmas and frights in sacrificing their lives in saving the nation without expecting thing in return?” A further question here is whether the obligations of health- care workers are dependent upon their receiving any special protection from society. If the obligations are to be linked to special protection, it would imply a model of their roles rather than a professional model, in which certain duties are inherently part of the job. This pandemic also resulted ethical dilemmas such on obligations among countries and the obligations of intergovernmental organizations? How should governments balance their duties to their own populations? And How the government ethically consider the safety and rights of their constituents regardless of their political interest? The current fight against the Covid-19 pandemic may require measures that restrict our human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the right to data protection and liberty in freedom. In this respect, as part of the contract tracing method. We are obliged to give all of our information even if it’s already intruding our privacy and might tamper our data and its protection. While on the other hand, during this outbreak, we have seen quarantine restrictions that are not evidence-based in effectiveness and infringe on individual liberty, which is a clear restriction of our individual freedom. Bribery in supplies amidst of this pandemic is another huge ethical problem all of us is concerning. Laundering in the essential products, particularly in health care sector makes the services more expensive and of a lower quality, it undermines patient’s trust in the health services. In addition, it distorts competition and has serious financial consequences for public health care insurers, and thus for the state budget. Mostly, it endangers the health and welfare of the patients and non-patients. Since there is no sort of entertainment in due to prohibition of mass gatherings and amusement activities outside. The social media serves as an “euphoric escapade” for us. It’s the least thing we can only have to cry and to smile for. But this pandemic renders individuals and society extremely vulnerable in all respects, including in cyberspace. Rampant malicious actors are exploiting these vulnerabilities resulting to “Cybercrime” is also an ethical conflict. As we have seen recently. Some big institutions and university’s website and social media accounts are hacked by anonymous hackers. It deals with the sudden duplication of Facebook accounts with some of users that is entitled to be anti-government and hacked by the said “trolls of the administration” shutting them up in criticizing the administration. Doubt in individual responsibility are consider to be an ethical challenge in this situation. To what extent should individuals have a responsibility to learn if they are at increased risk from certain exposures to deal with the consequences of illness caused by those exposures? To what extent does society have a duty to respect the autonomy of individuals to decline to learn of possible increased risks or to accept those risks? To what extent is society obligated to provide special protections for such individuals and health care if they become sick. Ethnocentric blame of disease spreading belongs with these problems in pandemic. Singling out certain ethnicities or religious groups as the sprawler of the virus is unethical. Like what we did in the early midst of these virus where most of our kababayans discriminate and avoiding the Chinese people in these fright that they might be contagious with the virus. These types of restriction increase risks to the most vulnerable and lead to xenophobic discriminatory acts by government and the public at large. This virus is not associated with any race or nationality. This practice has strong ties to countless historical instances of mistreatment, may causing to bigger dispute should be avoided at all time. The CoViD-19 crisis is a brutal reminder of the importance of ensuring lasting progress with respect to social rights, particularly through the development of universal public health services and human equity. The pandemic shows in practical terms the indivisibility of human rights. These is associated with the subsequent civil unrest and series of crimes. Ubiquitous fear and anxiety that accompanied the emergence of the new coronavirus led to widespread limits on physical contact in attempts to mitigate the spread of the virus. These cause massive unemployment, unequal treatment and discrimination among frontliners and CoViD patients. The recent protests, have occurred concurrently millions of people across the country have been problematically affected by the said problems. The resurgence of their anger at inequities in subsidy distribution by the government, the humiliation on frontliners as the virus courier as well as the covid patients and unequal division of health care treatment among the rich and poor ones was added to the anxiety and tension of the pandemic, creating a combustible scene of national civil unrest. These ethical divisions have raged the moment from the start. The civil unrest that has startle the public conversation is a stain on the national conscience. It is one should focus the nation, once and for all, on the underlying divisions that shape the country. But moreover, a threat to our nation because they involve dilemmas and deviance among our citizens who’s instead uniting in combating this pandemic, are just adding their problem one by one. This pandemic produce suffering, and suffering is itself sufficient cause for ethical concern. But from an ethical point of view, of even deeper concern is these ethical mess could have been anticipated and ameliorated with the help of exercising ethics even more in this pandemic. We have explored ethical aspects and conflicts in pandemic We have also pointed out the crucial need, in pandemic contingency, to look beyond if truth be told, in chaotic and desperate situations, ethics are secondary. Self-preservation takes over. We all have a duty to learn from these experiences, both positive and negative, and to educate ourselves through training courses, assimilating experience from the Covid outbreak. I think that our safety depends upon official vigilance, giving me these reflections. CoViD-19 is presenting the world with a unique opportunity to prove just how far we have come from the practices that have been used in the past. It is an eye-opener for everyone. Everything about the coronavirus pandemic, however, is unprecedented. Suddenly, we all have to lock ourselves in our own houses to keep safe. The CoViD-19 pandemic has disrupted the normality of modern living. The reality is that the virus threatens even ordinary freedoms, like the freedom of movement, with stay-at-home orders. I’ve realized that no matter how old or independent you are, you should never forget about family. In able to survive, we need to help each other. Everyone has a role to play in this crisis. It may be as simple as staying home, or as difficult as serving as a frontliner. We all need to do our part. We should set aside our selfish desires and look out for people who are more in need. Help out, in any way you can. Give what you can. Smile and be polite to others. Pray for everyone’s safety. Follow the rules because they are there to protect us. Be responsible and proactive. We can get through this, but we will need to work together. Global threats need global collaboration that can only be tackled if we cooperate. The world is cleaner than I imagined ever before. As people all over the world stay inside. This break create for our environment will result lasting effects for climate change as a whole. As we are lockdown within our homes. It’s the right time for creativity and self-improvement. The important thing about this time and making the most of it is tapping into your needs and realizing your potential to care for yourself unapologetically and without the fear of time running out. This pandemic has also brought me closer to God. I’ve been distant with God for a long time like I never read bible again as if I was doing like before. The words in the Bible have never been more alive. But now, facing this crisis, I feel my dependence on him growing deeper. This pandemic makes s all more desperate to seek for the lord. I’ve realized that everything I’ve achieved can fall apart in a matter of days. But his love and promises are still there. Covid might be destructive but there’s no such thing as omnipotent and powerful with God. Furthermore, we need to be emotionally and spiritually strong despite all the chaos and uncertainty. This crisis is a test of our resolve, faith and humanity. The unknown can cause us to panic but let’s pause for a while and reflect. What if there’s actually a well hiding in all of these? What if there’s a blessing in this setback that we find ourselves in? What if everything has a way of working out in the end despite our resistance to it? Perhaps, the current events are not working out in our favor but unknown to us is that pieces of the puzzle are still taking form. We shouldn’t brush off short-term setbacks, it’s always good to examine the key lessons they embody, reflect on these lessons and realize that the universe is in our favor. This crisis is already having and will continue to have devastating consequences for individuals and communities across the globe, which must not be underestimated. At the same time, the crisis also provides a critical opportunity for us to learn more about the CoViD is indeed a call for self-manifestation that we are responsible for our own-self. Implementing our rational, ethical, and effective measures is the only way forward. So don’t panic or blame, be prepared but don’t overreact, When we become responsible for our self-rationality only, we can extend our sense of responsibility towards our near and dear ones through our way of life. I can also have the appreciation for everything I have. This pandemic teaches me to be grateful with everything. Even it is a small achievement or a person ensuring my safety and happiness such as the people around me and the frontliners whose exerting all the effort to combat this virus? Or even you don’t have any blessings to move forward? With just simply waking up in the morning and breathing? We should be always thankful. Over time nature will force our hands, whether we are prepared or not. The idea of a “common enemy” may sound weird to many at this point, but the pandemic demonstrates that conventional power concepts are no longer useful when dealing with global threats. The notion of “worldwide stewardship” and the imperative to build stronger collaborative bonds across and between nations will ultimately become a necessity. Humanity needs more than anything. It needs a new focus on good stewardship for the life-supporting services that nature provides and a collective willingness to improve the state of all of us everywhere. No country is prepared for the next pandemic if the rest of the world is not. This pandemic gives us an opportunity to change course in this direction, call to better coordinate and mobilize efforts to deal with the impact of the pandemic in less countries would be a good first step for the better. Compassion should come first. We are all in this. Everyone is experiencing this pandemic and all the emotions that come with it, some more intense than others depending on your situation During this chaos, we then realize the weight of humanity, the implications of our actions and how we all are connected. In a crisis, hope can often be the only thing we can hold onto. For many, there is little to be hopeful for in the fight against the current pandemic, but like with anything, always keep on our minds that there is always a bright side even for the coronavirus pandemic. Crisis also brings us together; Shared experiences bring us together. As the world mourns amidst the pandemic, each of us seems to be more willing to lend a helping hand when needed during these uncertain times. from all different backgrounds are stepping up to show acts of kindness to each other. We start to understand each other a little more, allowing us to feel compassion and a sense of unity with one another. This crisis is sure to bond us as a society and bring us hope for a more peaceful world. Life will never be the same, but maybe for the better, the virus is only now spreading amongst the populations most of its lesson. It unfolds human vulnerabilities and showcasing the importance of good leadership and well-functioning, universal social and health care systems. While the current focus is on responding to the pandemic and on coping with its immediate effects, the lessons we will collectively learn from this crisis are equally if not more important, as we know that the next global crisis is already well under way. We are more learnt and equipped as before. This is of particular relevance for the younger generations. They will inherit the systems that we have now in reshaping response to the pandemic. Human history and natural history can no longer be separated. Human health and the health of the planet go together. We can respond to the current crisis while at the same time building a healthier, and safer future. Prevention is always better than cure, we must learn to listen to science. The pandemic is a strong reminder that ignoring science and history carries steep costs. While coping with the crisis, we have an opportunity to rediscover basic values of humanity and the bonds that connect us. We now have it in our hands to lay the foundation for a safer, healthier and cleaner life on planet earth. We have the technology and the means to come out stronger if we understand that human wellbeing and the health of the planet are two sides of the same coin. Now is the time to retire our old beliefs and to give way to a fresh start. We have a long road ahead of us. Life as we know it may be permanently changed. There will be sadness, fear and heartbreak. But I hope that among these, love, hope and faith will shine brighter. Let’s show this virus how strong the Filipino heart is. We will fight and we will win together. In the rationale, we will not return to what life was like before the pandemic. that is a fact. It is scary to accept change and to step into the unknown, but there is still hope to use this experience, these hard times, and turn it into something good. Our previously busy, hectic lives have come to stop and will probably remain so for the next months or so. We, as the world, will enter a time where life will slow down, and we will be more comfortable with the fact that we are producing less. We will narrow in on what really matters to us. All of these things, I have hope, will only change us, as a society, for the better. Yes, the coronavirus outbreak will forever change us as a world, like many other crises have changed the paths of nations, however, one thing is for sure, this pandemic is evidently bringing us together, as we share in the human experience of dramatic change. Things will change us for the better, Even in the worst circumstances, hope exists. Better, more beautiful days are ahead. Just keep pressing on, world. In every action, There is an opposite and ethical reaction Upon the declaration of 'state of calamity' due to the sudden spread of Covid-19 cases here in our country, The National Government strictly stressing implementations and regulations to address this pandemic and this can be easily done with the help of LGU’s and its officials. It has a lot of influence within their communities and can compel their constituents to strictly follow protocols crucial in the fight against COVID-19. The task force czar assigned met to the LGU officials to discuss how to strengthen the implementation of protocols and guidelines at the community level. Since the LGUs are free to utilize their resources to buy food packs to reach help within its constituents. I believe it has something to do with ethics. The Local government of my town, Guiguinto Bulacan has implementing various ways to cope with this pandemic. They started with the contract tracing of the suspected covid-19 patients together with the probable close contact they might be interacted that might be cause to an immense spread of the virus. It involves collection of personal information of the person which sounds intruding to their self-privacy. But if you follow utilitarianism, tracking this kind of personal information can be allowed with the “maximum benefits for the greatest number” principle. It’s for keeping society safe from infection by sacrificing personal privacy. Another action taken by our locality is the endless routine of humanity and bayanihan. Even before pandemic, Collective help of the Guiguintenyos within its kababayan are clearly evident. It can be considered as an habit to us in helping each other especially in this times of crisis. In this regard to Nichomachean Ethics, it usually maintained and emphasizes the role of habit in conduct. It is commonly thought that virtues, are habits and that the good life is a life of mindless routine. Since bayanihan and pakikipagkapwa-tao are the Filipino version of good virtue. It become a habit, moreover a trait of our personality as well. It reflects on how a good practice, if continuously practicing and executing can help to promote the general welfare for all. As an addition. The White Ribbon initiative of our locality in cooperation of the 14 barangays in our municipality was once recognized by our Department of Interior and Local Government, as a role model on how should a government and its citizen will collaboratively unite to fight this crisis. It prioritizes the less fortunate families of the community in the distribution of relief goods. It is emphasizing the prioritization of the poorest families as beneficiaries of the LGUs in handing out relief goods. initiative asks residents to tie a white ribbon on their doors or gates signifying that they want to waive or pass on their relief packages so that it can be given to poor families who could not afford to buy their own food at this time. “Make the poorest family your priority.” This White Ribbon Initiative is a demonstration of the genuine heart of the Filipinos in helping people in need. Same as The Golden Rule. It also looked like the principle of treating others as you want to be treated. It is a maxim that is found in many cultures such as us. It can be considered an ethic of reciprocity Treat others as you would like others to treat you. Ever since man has lived in groups larger and more complex than the simple generative unit, we have been seeking simple formulas strengthening our relationships with our kabayans. This principle had to be readily remembered and transmitted. We also incorporate rules readily comprehensible to and applicable by the individual members of our town. John Stuart Mill also has the signifies this statement that, “To do as you would be done by, and to love your neighbor as yourself, constitute the ideal perfection of utilitarian morality.” In relation to social order. No society or group can exist if social order is not established and maintained. Without these kind of morality, there is disruptive conflict, and chaos; without it there can be none of that individual freedom, self-determination, and self-realization that most of us longing to. Like how our locality works, “Sama-Sama, Tulong-Tulong, Lahat Makakaya”. Because some of the Guiguintenos once experienced to be on a one scratched, one-peck situation in the basis of his own experience, these citizens accept the other fellow as one more or less like himself, and expands in his imagination, his own motives or desires to this other fellow. They do the same good for another that they might reasonably desire for our poor kabayans if we’re in their place, This practice also constitute rule the fact that man can, in terms of his own experience, visualize and appreciate his neighbor’s predicament, and that he can act or refrain from acting to him as he would have his neighbor act or refrain from acting toward him. In all of this essence. The ethics matter well within all the solutions, our community do. It obtained a wide acceptance among the best and most enlightened intellects of the community, a restraining principle, a guide of what they ought not do rather than of what they ought. We human beings tend to be only fair and just to “our own kind of folks.” But if we act in accord with the positive rule of ethics in every action we will make. We unavoidably have to considered to be selective on who we are going to be kind and who we’re going to help. Help is not selective in terms. It is generous in many ways that it can. If ethics are always be applied with every move we take. Surely, we get the life’s most results. In every cloud, There’s this silver lining The world is facing this global crisis that is spreading human suffering, infecting the global condition and upending people’s lives. This is a moment that demands coordinated, decisive and innovative action from all parts of society. While recognizing the urgency to address the global scale and complexity of the crisis, it’s still outlines the manner in which the humanitarian community in the Philippines is coming together in a coordinated and inclusive way to support each other efforts in response to the Covid-19 pandemic as well as the needs emerging in its aftermath. Like what Martin Luther King has always been said: “Life’s most urgent and persistent question is What are you doing for others? In Barangay, Sta. Cruz, Guiguinto, Bulacan where I’m residing for 15 years has its own practice of Conduct. Even the pandemic is not yet arising, This community executing humanity at its finest within its citizens. We’re like an ant colony that is collectively building our barangay with the help of the unique role, each of every one of us has. We taking our roles not as a duty to stand but a purpose in doing and giving life for others. As a democratic Citizens, we have a set of rights and responsibilities, including the right to participate in decisions that affect public welfare. In our intrinsic democratic value, participation is our driver to change, and a fundamental way to empower our co-citizens. Being a citizen without acting like one is not the true meaning of citizen at all. A citizen must be vigilant and involved in the occurrence on his surroundings. How to be involved for our nation’s change? It must start with our compliance. Here in barangay Sta. Cruz, all of us ensures that we comply and obey all of the necessary measures for the safety of our community against the virus. They might some violators who breaks the rules, but most of us comply with it. For us as a democratic country, We hold the key to run this country but unfortunately, that key is being driven by the politicians whose controlling our rights to take advantage their power and authority. But as a democratic citizen. We shouldn’t only exercise our rights to elect whoever will govern us. Democracy is for people, The government of the people; Our Government. By means that we have the authority but we wouldn’t have the control. Doesn’t mean we don’t have any ace to contribute for our country. Doing our least role in complying with the laws will develop and progress our country. In the absence of compliance, There’s no order, Even we don’t solely run the country? Just putting some importance and nationalism for our country will make our country better than any politicians can do. Meanwhile, Our barangay together with the Sangguniang kabataan (SK) officials and volunteers worked together in the cleaning and sanitation drive all over the vicinity of Barangay Sta. Cruz to ensure that the community is neat, disinfected and safe for all the residents. Aside from the carefully planning for coordination and sustained contact with key constituents and audiences within major public health disruptions like this. Communication will never be absent in our barangay. They have a hotline which divided into CoViD-19 and a friendly hotline. The CoViD-19 hotline reserve for all of the questions, aid needed, action plan, subsidy and SAP inquiries related to this pandemic. While on the other hand, The Friendly hotline serves as a helping hand for all of the people who’s currently suffering from mental traumas and conflicts cause by this pandemic. These hotlines are all purpose hotline exclusively for the welfare of its citizens open 24/7. Since we’re on the half of the month, Even the strongest hardship like this virus will not hinders us to celebrate our monthly “Linggo ng Kabataan” annually, in celebration of International Youth Day. For this year, The event launches competitions in video making, fashion show and a 20 smartphone raffle all in line on help for the people whose financially in need within this pandemic. The mechanics of the competition are strictly open only for the youth age 15 y/o -25 that are financially unstable, while the other financially stabled youth that wants to join are just tolerating give their entries for those in need. John F. Kennedy once said: “Tolerance implies no lack of commitment to one's own beliefs. Rather it condemns the oppression or persecution of others”. It is the same motive why our barangay promoting it. I can lauded in behalf of tolerance and compassion the “White Ribbon initiative" of our barangay that has been said above statement which prioritizes the less fortunate families of the community in the distribution of relief goods. It is emphasizing the prioritization of the poorest families as beneficiaries of the LGUs in handing out relief goods. And The main good practice highlight in our barangay is the lively action of the words “Humanity”. The CoViD-19 pandemic constitutes an unprecedented challenge with very severe socio-economic consequences. We are committed to do everything necessary to meet this challenge in a spirit of solidarity. So we are, on our barangay are remaining resilient and unified despite of the struggles, on how this pandemic is largely putting our lives at stake. The Sta. Cruzians lives the spirit of bayanihan in offering a helping hand every time one of us needs help whether in money or in mental strength. We also promote compassion in all of the quarantine violators whose instead of persecuting them a criminal case, They are just given understanding, a grocery pack and a ceremonial pledge as a promise that they will not repeat to violate the quarantine protocols. Most importantly, We are all reminded by our barangay government, despite of this pandemic, We should practice the values, Even life pushes us hard to commit crimes and faults just to survive, We shouldn’t. There’s so much beyond the laws and lectures that we know. As like the old saying. “Educating the mind without educating the hearts is not education at all”. Even the smartest prodigy together with all of his knowledge are seems to be futile if he doesn’t have the wisdom in using the virtue to make life great. I think it is most effective tool our community has. It uses this to secure harmony and prosperity within our group. As Mark twain saying” Laws control the lesser man... Right conduct controls the greater one.” I’m not Catriona Gray, But I must say even we are on a destructive storm now, and life is poor and sad. We should have always taught ourselves to look for the beauty in it; to look in the beauty and hope in the faces of every people that’s keep standing despite of this pandemic. And we should be grateful for our lives that’s still living strong. Even the world is behind the storm’s darkest cloud. We should learn to see this situation with a silver lining. Assess where we could give something; where we could provide something as a spokesperson and a giver for others. And teach people to how to be still grateful. We should stay still, have a leap of faith with God that one day, without any virus or problem, We can have an amazing world where negativity cannot grow and prosper, where all of us will have smiles on our faces.