What Is A Questionnaire?
What Is A Questionnaire?
What Is A Questionnaire?
Types of questionnaires
As we explored before, questionnaires can be either structured or
free-flowing. Let’s take a closer look at what that entails for your
surveys.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235801675_Questionnaire_Designing_for_a_Survey
Matrix Questions
I d e n ti c a l r e s p o n s e c a t e g o r i e s a r e a s s i g n e d t o m u l ti p l e
questi ons. The questi ons are placed one under the other,
forming a matrix with response categories along the top and a
list of questions down the side. This is an efficient use of
page space and respondents’ time.
Example: Carver and White’s BIS/BAS scale. Behavioral
approach system (BAS)/behavioral avoidance (or inhibition)
system.
Closed-ended Questions
Respondents’ answers are limited to a fixed set of responses.
Most scales are closed ended. Types of closed-ended
questions include:
a. Yes/No questions—The respondent answers the questions
with a ‘yes’ or a ‘no’.
Example: Have you ever visited a dentist?
b. Multiple choice—The respondent has several options from
which to choose.
Example: How would you rate this product
(i) Excellent (ii) Good (iii) Fair (iv) Poor
c. Scaled questions—Responses are graded on a continuum
(example: Rate the appearance of the product on a scale
from 1 to 10, with 10 being the most preferred appearance).
Examples of types of scales include the Likert scale and
Open-ended Questions
The options or predefined categories are not suggested. The
respondent replies in their own words without being
constrained by a fixed set of possible responses. Types of
open-ended questions include.
a. Completely unstructured—For example, ‘What is your
opinion on questionnaires?’
b . W o r d a s s o c i a ti o n — W o r d s a r e p r e s e n t e d a n d t h e
respondent mentions the first word that comes to mind.
Example: If interviewer says cold, the respondent may say
hot and the like ones.
c . S e n t e n c e c o m p l e ti o n — R e s p o n d e n t s c o m p l e t e a n
incomplete sentence. For example, ‘The most important
consideration in my decision to buy a new house is . . .’
d. Story completion—Respondents complete an incomplete
story.
e . P i c t u r e c o m p l e ti o n — R e s p o n d e n t s fi l l i n a n e m p t y
conversation balloon.
f. Thematic apperception test—Respondents explain a picture
or make up a story about what they think is happening in
the picture.
Ideal Requisites of a Questionnaire
A questionnaire should:
1. Be composed of a simple and a specific language
2. Demand one answer on one dimension
3. Yield a truthful and accurate answer
4. Accommodate all possible contingencies of a response
5. Have mutually exclusive response options
6. Produce variability in response
7. Minimize social desirability.
Main Aspects of a Questionnaire
There are three main aspects of a questionnaire:
1. General form
2. Question sequence
3. Question formulation and wording.
General Form
A questi onnaire can be either structured or unstructured.
Structured questions are those questions in which there are
definite, concrete and predetermined questions. The questions
are presented with exactly the same wordings and in the same
order to all respondents. A highly structured questionnaire is
one in which all questions and answers are specified and
comments in respondents own words are minimized.
Example: Do you have a driver’s license?
( ) Yes
( ) No
W h e n t h e s e c h a r a c t e r i s ti c s a r e n o t p r e s e n t i n a
questionnaire, it is termed as unstructured or nonstructured
questionnaire. Interviewer is provided with a general guide on
the type of information to be obtained, but the exact question
formulation is largely his own responsibility and replies are
to be taken down in respondent’s own words.
Example: How can we stop dental caries?
Question Sequence
The question sequence must be clear and smoothly moving. A
proper sequence of questions reduces considerably the chances
of individual question being misunderstood. The first few
questions are particularly important because they are likely
to influence the attitude of respondents and in seeking his
desired cooperation.
The following questions should be avoided as opening
questions:
i. Questions that put great strain on memory
ii. Questions of a personal character
iii. Questions related to personal wealth.
Relatively difficult, personal and intimate questions should
be kept toward the end. Thus, question sequence should usually
go from the general to the more specific questions.
Question Formulation and Wording
Question should be very clear and impartial in order not to
give a biased picture of the true state of affairs. In general the
questions should meet the following standards.
Should be:
i. Easily understood
ii. Be simple
iii. Should convey only one thought at a time
iv. Be concrete and conform as much as possible to
respondent’s way of thinking
v. Words with ambiguous meanings must be avoided
vi. Danger words, catch words and words with emotional
connotations must be avoided.
Methods to Reach Target Respondents
Pilot Survey/Pretesting Questions
Pilot survey: A preliminary part of research conducted before
a complete survey to test the effectiveness of the research
methodology.
Purpose of Pretesting
To determine whether:
i. The questions are properly framed
ii. Wording of the questions will achieve the desired results
iii. The questions have been placed in the best order
iv. The questions are understood by all classes of respondents
v. Additional or specifying questions are needed or some
need to be eliminated
vi. Instructions to interviewers are adequate.
Basic Steps in Pretesting
1. Select the sample similar in socioeconomic background
and geographic location which is intended to be used in
the main study
2. Instruct interviewers to note all respondents’ remarks
regarding instructions or question wording.
3. Administer the questionnaire.
4. Check the results.
Reliability
Reliability refers to the extent to which a measurement gives
consistent results. In pretesting of questionnaire, one should
check the following:
a. Inter-interviewer reliability
b. Test-retest reliability
c. Internal consistency reliability.
Inter-interviewer Reliability
T h i s i s u s e d t o a s s e s s d e g r e e t o w h i c h t h e d i ff e r e n t
interviewer’s gives consistent interpretati on of the same
phenomenon in case of interview administered questionnaire.
Test-retest Reliability
This is used to assess the consistency of response from one
time to another.
Both interobserver reliability and test-retest reliability is
checked by kappa statistics. The reliability is acceptable if the
value is 80% or above.
The reliability of the tool is judged by estimating how well
the items reflect the same construct. Will they yield similar
results? This is expressed using the statistical test Cronbach’s
(alpha). It is acceptable if the value is 80% or above. Once the
reliability of tool is proven then one may proceed to test the
validity. If a questionnaire is unreliable then it cannot be valid.
Internal Consistency Reliability
This is used to judge the reliability of the tool by estimating
how consistent the results are for different items of the same
construct.
Example: Impact of dental caries on the activities of daily
living. If the respondent says he has pain due to dental caries
and also tells he does not have trouble eating, that means the
questionnaire is not framed properly.
Internal consistency reliability is expressed using the
statistical test Cronbach’s- [alpha]. It is acceptable if the value
is 80% or above.
Validity
The degree to which a questionnaire measures what it was
intended to measure. In questionnaire we check four types of
validity.
a. Content validity
b. Face validity
c. Criterion validity
d. Construct validity
Content Validity
Refers to the extent to which a tool represents all aspects of a
given social concept. Expert judgment is the primary method
used to determine whether a test/tool have content validity.
Statistical tests are not employed here. If content validity is
acceptable, one can proceed to face validity.
Face Validity
This is an estimate of whether the item of a questionnaire
seems to be appropriate, i.e. at face value are they getting the
response in way the researcher aims to measure.
Face validity can be done using two methods:
1. Interview/Probe method: Here we select a random sample
which is approximately 5 to 10% of final sample size and
administer the questionnaire to them. Then the investigator
will have a detailed discussion with them regarding each
item, assessing their understanding about each question.
Any modification may be done to decide the final format.
2. Bilingual method: It is employed if the tool is translated
into a regional language. Here bilingual expert who is well-
versed in both the languages is employed to assess the
face validity. Ideally it should be done and approved by
official translators.
Criterion Validity
It indicates the effectiveness of questionnaire in predicting
the outcomes of what it measures. The responses on the
questionnaire being developed are checked against on external
criteria or by using gold standard which is direct and
i n d e p e n d e n t m e a s u r e o f w h a t t h e n e w q u e s ti o n n a i r e i s
designed to measure. The criterion validity maybe concurrent
or predictive. It is said to be concurrent when both the tools
are administered simultaneously or predicti ve where the
predictor tool is administered first and after some period a
new tool is administered.
Construct Validity
This refers to the extent to which new questionnaire conforms
(goes along with) to existing ideas or hypothesis concerning
the concepts/constructs that are being measured.
Recognizing Poor Questions through Pretesting
The signs which indicate that there are errors in the early drafts
of the questionnaire are as follows:
1. Lack of order in the answers: This may be due to use of
difficult words or questions which attempt to obtain too
much data at one time.
2. All or none responses: We can suspect that our question
has elicited a mere stereotyped response or cliché, if all
respondents answer the same way.
3. High proporti on of don’t know or do not understand
answers: Large percentage of do not know suggest that
the question is vague, it is too complex, it involves difficult
answers or respondent is simply not in a position to answer
the question.
4. High proportion of refusal to answers: This suggests that
the interviewing instructions or training is insufficient.
Restudy any question for which the refusal rate is over
5% or more.
5. S u b s t a n ti a l v a r i a ti o n i n a n s w e r s w h e n o r d e r o f
questi ons has been changed: Wording of questi ons is
not adequate, first alternatives are chosen more often, or
choice of order is not proper.
CONCLUSION
A questionnaire is a tool which can be used in any type of
research. This article is developed to give in-depth information
about requisites like constructing a questionnaire, pilot testing
them, standardizing them and reframing the poor questions. It
is good practice to ‘pilot’ or pretest your questionnaire with a
small sample of respondents. Before using it to check people’s
understanding and ability to answer the questions, highlight
the areas of confusion and look for any routing errors, as well
as provide an estimate of the average time each questionnaire
will take to complete.
A sincere effort from the authors in bringing about this
article is to help the researchers to improve their ability in
designing a questionnaire. A carefully and accurately designed
questionnaire helps us to collect reliable information