The document discusses techniques for conducting a mental status examination and psychiatric assessment. It notes that a mental status exam focuses on current functioning in key areas, while a full assessment also includes history, coping skills, and other factors. It provides examples of assessment options for various data and functions to evaluate, such as appearance, mood, orientation, and memory. The document emphasizes validating findings, avoiding subjective terms, and noting both the presence and absence of symptoms.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document discusses techniques for conducting a mental status examination and psychiatric assessment. It notes that a mental status exam focuses on current functioning in key areas, while a full assessment also includes history, coping skills, and other factors. It provides examples of assessment options for various data and functions to evaluate, such as appearance, mood, orientation, and memory. The document emphasizes validating findings, avoiding subjective terms, and noting both the presence and absence of symptoms.
The document discusses techniques for conducting a mental status examination and psychiatric assessment. It notes that a mental status exam focuses on current functioning in key areas, while a full assessment also includes history, coping skills, and other factors. It provides examples of assessment options for various data and functions to evaluate, such as appearance, mood, orientation, and memory. The document emphasizes validating findings, avoiding subjective terms, and noting both the presence and absence of symptoms.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document discusses techniques for conducting a mental status examination and psychiatric assessment. It notes that a mental status exam focuses on current functioning in key areas, while a full assessment also includes history, coping skills, and other factors. It provides examples of assessment options for various data and functions to evaluate, such as appearance, mood, orientation, and memory. The document emphasizes validating findings, avoiding subjective terms, and noting both the presence and absence of symptoms.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6
MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION TECHNIQUES and PSYCHIATRIC
ASSESSMENT
Note:
1. A MENTAL STATUS EXAM is part of a psychiatric/mental health assessment. The mental
status exam focuses on the client’s current functioning in a variety of areas. However, a complete assessment also adds pertinent medical and psychiatric history, coping skills or assets, and other components that are not part of a mental status exam. 2. The examiner conducts the mental status exam via direct interview and observation; content from staff, family, and/or the chart can be incorporated into the assessment otherwise, e.g. as history, but should not be used to complete the mental status portion of the assessment unless the data is otherwise unavailable, e.g. (“Pt refuses to respond when asked about suicidal ideation and intent, but his father reports that he found the pt poised to cut his wrists with a piece of broken glass on 6/12/2010, and noted that the pt has been despondent since breaking up with his girlfriend on 6/2/10, which followed being laid off from his job on 5/30/2010”. 3. SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED AS APPROPRIATE. E.g. if the patient is experiencing command hallucinations, discuss their implications for pt safety, needed discharge precautions, patient and family teaching, etc. Other examples of findings meriting further discussion include other risk issues, impact of treatment non-adherence, lack of support systems or insight, etc. 4. IT IS IMPORTANT TO VALIDATE YOUR FINDINGS AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. Pts may deny symptoms or loss of function d/t anosognosia (the inability to recognize one’s own illness), denial, or a desire to present themselves in a more positive light. Issues such as substance abuse or risk to self are not infrequently minimized or concealed. Therefore the examiner should note whether the pt’s reports are consistent or inconsistent with his behavior and other indicators. E.g. “Pt denies hallucinations but is observed whispering to self and appears to be responding to internal stimuli” or “Pt denies and does not evidence hallucinations”. This is especially important for data that is more likely to be misrepresented and/or data that is more critical to safety or treatment (e.g. suicidality). It may also be helpful to note when there are conflicts between the pt’s reports and those of others such as staff or reliable family, even when the examiner does not himself observe the contradiction. 5. AVOID USE OF SUBJECTIVE ADJECTIVES SUCH AS “NORMAL”; instead, describe what you observe. E.g. instead of “Affect is normal”, one could note that “Affect is appropriate for the circumstances, euthymic, and without lability”. Other descriptors that are often used in cases where no abnormalities are noted include: “(function) is intact”, “(function) is unremarkable”, “Pt does not evidence (abnormal function)”. 6. Be alert for the influence of culture. A pt who is homeless, frequently hungry, and without any income might well respond differently than one who is financially or residentially stable when his judgment is tested (e.g. . he might keep some of the money in a found wallet). 7. For each category of assessment, note both the presence and the absence of dysfunction or symptoms. If one mentions only that some symptoms are present but does not note that others are absent, the reader cannot know for certain if other possible symptoms were absent or simply overlooked by the examiner. E.g. “Pt demonstrated flight of ideas but did not demonstrate looseness of associations, referentiality, magical thinking, or cognitive slowing’
MENTAL STATUS ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES
Data or Function Examples of Assessment Options
1. Reason for admission (chief “What led to you being in the hospital?” “Tell me about how complaint) you came to be admitted here.” “What events led to your admission?” 2. General Description/Physical Observe pt’s appearance: describe pt’s apparent vs. actual appearance age; dress (casual vs. formal, clean vs. unclean, appropriate for the weather vs. not, etc); grooming and hygiene (well- kempt vs. unkempt, presence or absence of body odor); body modifications (piercings, tattoos, intentional scarring); visible deformities, scars, lesions; anything else that is unusual or notable about the patient’s appearance. 3. Posture Observe Pt’s position, gestures, and other remarkable motor behavior. Possible descriptors include unremarkable, stiff, rigid, erect, slumped, bizarre, posturing (describe), etc. 4. Facial expression Observe the dominate expression on the pt’s face; possible findings include unremarkable, impassive, expressionless, labile, grimacing, hypervigilant, etc 5. Eye contact Observe; possible descriptors include direct, minimal, piercing, sustained, intermittent, etc. 6. Motor activity Observe behavior; possible findings include: unremarkable, motor retardation, lethargic, motor restlessness, increased muscular tension, tics, posturing, tremors, unusual gestures or mannerisms, repetitive motions, compulsive actions, echopraxia 7. Relatedness to interviewer Observe manner and comfort r/t how pt relates to and interacts with the examiner. Possible findings include: pleasant, friendly, open vs. closed body posture, withdrawn, reticent, resistant, inappropriate r/t roles and boundaries (describe, e.g. seductive), suspicious, guarded, angry, hostile, resistant, shy, negativistic, cooperative vs. uncooperative, apathetic, defensive 8. Affect Observe apparent emotional tone and display of emotion in the present moment. Possible findings: constricted, expansive, stable, labile, flat, blunted, hyperreactive, congruent or incongruent with thoughts/situation, tearful, laughing, etc. 9. Mood Ask pt to describe his prevailing mood/emotion at the present time. Possible finding findings/descriptors include: euthymic, dysthymic, dysphoric, euphoric, sad, anxious, fearful, angry, empty, sad/depressed, hopeless, despairing, etc 10. Orientation Ask pt his name, the date, his location, and the situation he is in. If he does not know the date, ask for the day of the week; if unable to provide the day, ask for the month, and if unsuccessful ask for the season; ask for the year in all cases. Describe the pt’s orientation to time, place, person, situation, including quoted responses if disoriented. 11. Level of Consciousness Observe the pt’s degree of consciousness. Possible findings include: Unremarkable; fully alert; mild; moderately, or severely impaired; appears tired; readily falls asleep unless stimulated; difficult to awaken; etc 12. Memory Observe for indications of impaired memory (does or does not recognize examiner on subsequent visits; does or does not recall topic of recent interactions, groups, TV programs; cannot find way back to room; becomes lost when driving in once-familiar surroundings; etc). Test recent memory by naming three common objects (e.g. cat, ball, dog), having pt repeat these, and then asking pt to recall these at 5 minutes and 15 minutes. Test remote memory by asking pt to recall events to which pt was exposed or had knowledge of, and that are known to the examiner; e.g. pt’s previous address, mother’s maiden name, past three employers, first girlfriend, first pet, etc. Describe the findings, e.g. “Remembers three of five objects at five minutes”. Other descriptors include: Intact; mildly, moderately, or severely/grossly impaired; etc 13. Concentration and Attention Observe the pt’s ability to concentrate and maintain focus and attend to the interaction and environment. Test the pt’s ability to concentrate by asking him to serially subtract seven from 100, or to spell a common 6-8 letter word in reverse (e.g. “world”); if the pt is unable to complete serial sevens, ask him to subtract 3 from 20 and continue to serially subtract 3 from each result. Possible findings include: Unremarkable; mild; moderately, or severely impaired; lacks alertness; hyperalert; appears tired; minimally responsive; easily or readily distracted; maintains focus; returns spontaneously to previous topic when interrupted; etc 14. Abstract vs. Concrete Thinking Ask pt to interpret a proverb such as “The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence” or “Strike while the iron is hot”. The proverb should be familiar to the pt if possible. If pt is unable to respond to proverbs, observe for situations wherein the pt demonstrates concrete thinking vs. the ability to think abstractly. Describe the pt’s response or your related observations. 15. Judgment Ask pt to describe how he would respond to a hypothetical situation wherein a decision is required; the situation should be one that any person might encounter. E.g. “What would you do if you were at home (in your apt, room, etc) and you smelled smoke?” or “What would you do if you found a wallet on the sidewalk?” If the pt is unable to respond to this inquiry, observe and describe judgment that is apparent in decisions made recently. Note whether judgment is intact or impaired, briefly describing the pt’s response or other data on which your conclusions are based. 16. Insight Assess the pt’s understanding and appreciation of his illness, symptoms, treatment and related events/experiences. Ask the pt to describe the reason for his coming to the attention of treatment staff and compare it to the facts. Ask the pt what he believes is wrong vs. what staff or family believe is wrong, and to discuss his beliefs about any variances that might exist in the differing perspectives. Ask the pt what he feels is wrong and what he feels would most be helpful. Validate your findings by inquiring for any incongruent data such as medication nonadherence in a pt who reports that he has a mental illness and needs to take his meds. Summarize findings as “judgment intact” or “judgment mildly (moderately, grossly) impaired”, adding a brief description of the pt indicators upon which your conclusions are based. 17. Speech Observe the pt’s speech characteristics and patterns. Possible findings include: rate unremarkable, rapid, slow; soft vs. loud; impoverished (poverty of speech) vs. spontaneous (fluent) vs. verbose; fragmented; pressured; etc 18. Thought Content Ask the pt what he tends to think about, what thoughts he may have had that were troubling or unusual, what issues concern him most, and other questions that focus on the content of his thoughts. Observe and note the predominant trends and preoccupations (content or topics that prevail, or basic themes that pervade various topics, such as loneliness or mistrust); document fears, fantasies, dreams, ambitions, optimism, pessimism, obsessions, phobias, etc. Note any depressive characteristics such as self-deprecation, negative thinking, self-criticism, etc. Note grandiose themes or elements such as unrealistic plans or preoccupation with actual or desired wealth, power or success. Note delusional thinking (false beliefs held despite evidence to the contrary) and document examples, noting the type. Also note the presence or absence of ideas of reference, thought broadcasting, thought insertion, magical thinking, etc. 19. Thought Process Observe the pt’s thought processes as evident in speech and behavior. Note whether the thought processes are logical, coherent vs. incoherent, well-organized or disorganized. Note also the presence or absence of circumstantial or tangential thinking, neologisms, flight of ideas (FOI), looseness of associations (LOA), perseveration, confabulation, thought blocking, word salad, etc. 20. Perceptions Elicit the pt’s perceptions via interview; possible questions include “Do you ever see or hear things that other others might now see?” or “Tell me what you are experiencing now” (used especially when the pt appears to be responding to internal stimuli). If the pt reports hallucinations, note whether he perceives them as being inside his head (e.g. self-talk, which is not really a hallucination), or as coming from outside (which is more typical of hallucinations). Note that if one asks “Do you ever hear voices?”, a pt may respond positively simply because they assume you mean internal self-talk; specifying “voices that others do not hear” can help avoid this problem. Observe for behavior suggestive of hallucinatory activity: turning the head as if to attend to sounds from a particular direction, suddenly stopping mid-sentence or mid-activity (as if interrupted by an unseen person or other perception), lips moving, talking when alone (as if to unseen others, which pts may do mostly when they do not believe they are being observed), inappropriate affect (that is incongruent with the external circumstances, but might reflect internal stimuli), etc. Inquire as to whether the pt experiences the hallucinations as persistent or intermittent, intrusive or in the background, and disruptive or able to be ignored. Determine the content and themes of the hallucinations: e.g. are they comforting or accusatory or condemning, or do they provide a running commentary on the pt’s activity or environment? Assess for patterns in the pt’s experience: do they tend to occur or worsen at certain times or under certain circumstances (e.g. when the pt is alone or fearful)? Attempt to place them on a timeline: determine when they occurred or worsened, and what circumstances preceded the perceptions. IN ALL CASES WHEREIN AUDITORY HALLUCINATIONS ARE PRESENT OR SUSPECTED, DETERMINE IF COMMAND HALLUCINATIONS ARE PRESENT (“Tell me what you hear”). If command hallucinations are present, assess the pt’s response to these: “What do you do when you hear a voice telling you to take an action?” or “What would you do if you heard a voice you thought was God telling you to hurt another person?”. Note: hallucinations may be vague or unformed: sounds, colors, distorted appearance in real objects, or distortion of existing sounds. Note the presence or absence of sensations (tactile hallucinations), smells (olfactory hallucinations) or tastes (gustatory hallucinations) that do not appear to be based in reality. Assess the pt’s reality testing, i.e. his ability to determine if the perception is based in reality; e.g. “What do you think is the origin (cause, etc) of the voice you hear?” “Do you believe the voice is real or that it is a hallucination?”. Observe for the presence or absence of illusions (mistaking a coat rack in a dark corner for a person). 21. Pain Ask the pt whether pain is experienced, and when present, assess its characteristics: onset, triggers, location, nature (sharp vs. dull, etc), radiation, relief measures, intensity on a 0-10 scale, and its impact on activities of daily living (ADL’s). 22. Risk for harm to self Complete an inventory of risk factors, noting their presence or absence, and including but not limited to: suicidal thoughts (if present, assess the degree to which they preoccupy the client, how intrusive they are, the presence of a plan, the lethality of any plan; the pt’s likelihood of acting on any tentative plan); past attempts by the pt (and/or by peers or significant others); significant losses (tangible or intangible) and anniversaries of such losses; impulsiveness; despair or dysphoria; depressed mood; presence of command hallucinations; a belief that death would bring relief or would benefit others; psychosis; substance abuse; termination activities such as giving away belongings, wrapping up affairs, or saying goodbye to others; history of self-injurious behavior/mutilation; the pt’s access to the means of suicide (e.g. “Are there guns in your house?”). The assessment should be direct but empathic; e.g. “Sometimes a person who is depressed can feel so very bad that it seems as if the pain is unbearable, so bad that they wish they were dead; tell me how it feels to you.” and “You have suffered many losses recently; have these losses ever led you to consider hurting yourself?” Note that while a pt may not have thoughts or intent re: hurting himself, he might experience a passive longing for death, which may later progress toward suicidality. Also: assess the pt’s coping skills: how does he cope, how well does he believe it works, and what does he do when it does not work. Also assess the pt’s ability to maintain his own safety in terms of moving about his environment safely, interacting with others in a manner that does not create conflict or violent responses, providing for own medical or health needs, assuring adequate intake and rest, and providing for protection from dangerous weather via shelter and clothing. The examiner can note the pt’s history in these regards, observe current behavior and responses, and ask the pt how he would respond in hypothetical situations. 23. Risk to others Complete an inventory of risk factors, noting their presence or absence, and including but not limited to: paranoia; a belief that violence is justified or necessary; thoughts about hurting others; urges or intent to hurt others; anger towards others; impulsivity; substance abuse; history of assault; frustration intolerance; lack of empathy for others or other antisocial traits; history of property destruction or harming animals; psychosis. Assess the pt’s strategies for managing anger and frustration, e.g. “What do you do when you become angry?” or “What is the most embarrassing or regrettable thing you have ever done when angry?” or “Tell me about a time when your anger got you into trouble”. 24. Substance Use and Abuse Ask the pt if he has occasion to use illegal substances and/or medications not as prescribed by his health care provider. If so, note the substances used; the route, amount and frequency of their use; the reasons for and circumstances of their use (e.g. when under stress); the consequences of their use (impact on relationships, ADL’s, health, employment, school and other role performance; resulting injuries, illnesses, hospitalizations, arrests, incarcerations); the pt’s perceived control over this use; the presence or absence of craving when not using the substance (and how the pt responds to cravings). Ask if the pt’s peers or family have expressed concerns about his substance use, and if he has been stopped for possibly driving under the influence (or for often-related offenses such as public urination, public indecency, or disorderly conduct). Inquire about past treatment for substance abuse. Note whether the pt has a history of prescriptions from multiple providers and/or of seeking care in multiple settings. 25. Compulsive Behaviors Observe for and inquire about behaviors such as gambling, sexual addictions, compulsive counting or numbering, and frequency of hand washing; ask if the pt has any rituals or behaviors that he uses to reduce anxiety or that he feels he must engage in in order to feel comfortable. 26. Social and role functioning Inquire about and observe for impaired social functioning; examples include conflict or impaired performance in work, school, parental or other roles; inability to develop or maintain support systems; conflict with others; aversion to social situations; loss of relationships, employment or school enrollment. Observe and describe social skills such as communication skills. 27. Other Neurological deficits can be elicited by the following techniques: 1. ask the pt to complete a task involving three steps given at one time (e.g. “Write your name on this paper, fold it in half, then fold it in half again”) 2. ask the pt to identify common objects such as a coin, key or pencil, first visually and then by touch alone, with eyes closed; 3. ask the pt to draw the face of an analog clock