Baccarat Math
Baccarat Math
Baccarat Math
Baccarat’s overall house advantage is about 1.2% – one of the lowest in the casino. After bets are made,
two cards are dealt to each side (player and banker). All cards are community cards – there are no
individual hands. Face cards and Tens are worth zero, Aces count as one, and all other cards are worth
face value. The total for a hand is the sum of the values of the individual cards in the hand.
A total of 8 or 9 on the first two cards is called a natural. If either side has a natural, the hand is over,
and wagers are resolved. If neither side has a natural, a fixed set of rules (following) is applied to
determine if either side takes a third card. Once the hands are complete, the side with the higher total
wins. If the two sides have equal totals, player and banker bets are a push. The payoffs on winning
player and banker bets are even money, but a 5% commission is charged to banker wins.68 A winning
Baccarat’s hitting and standing rules are presented in the following table. To read the table, start with
the player’s first two cards total in the left column and proceed to the right, column by column to
determine the drawing/standing rules. The rules favor the banker and the casino’s advantage on the
banker bet would be negative without the 5% commission. With this commission, the house advantage
on the banker bet is 1.06% (including ties). House Advantage: Player Bet: 1.24% (1.37% ignoring ties)
Banker Bet: 1.06% (1.17% ignoring ties) Tie Bet: 14.36% Typical Hold: 18% (Nevada)
*If either player or banker totals 8 or 9 on first two cards, no cards are drawn, and hand is over.
As mentioned above, since the drawing rules are fixed, baccarat offers no opportunity for strategic
decisions like blackjack does. Furthermore, although the game involves dependent trials (like blackjack),
it has been shown that card-counting techniques are not effective in baccarat.
Since baccarat is typically played with eight decks of cards, a proper mathematical analysis of baccarat
can be performed by examining all combinations of player and banker hands for all possible six-card
sequences in an eight-deck shoe. The analysis can be limited to six-card subsets since no hand can
consist of more than six total cards for player and banker combined, and since hands comprised of less
than six cards can be accounted for by summing the appropriate probabilities.
However, since suits and the distinction between Tens, Jacks, Queens, and Kings are irrelevant, only
5,005 distinguishable six-card subsets are possible, significantly easing the computational burden. A
complete analysis, then, consists of (1) identifying the 5,005 distinguishable six-card subsets, (2) playing
through the 180 possible hands for each of these subsets, (3) recording the player and banker scores
and winning.
The outcome (player, banker, or tie) for each hand, and (4) weighting each of the (5005 x 180)
subsets).
The analysis described above shows that the player wins 44.625% of the hands, the banker wins
45.860% of the hands, and 9.516% end up tied. A complete breakdown by banker total.
The player and banker advantages can be expressed either including or excluding ties. The 1.24% and
1.06% advantages reported above include ties. If ties are ignored, the player will win 49.3175% of the
hands and the banker will win 50.6825%. The expected values per resolved bet for these two bets are:
advantages per resolved bet also could be obtained by dividing the house advantages per hand by the
Regardless of whether house advantage is expressed per hand or per resolved bet, expected casino
earnings are the same. For example, if a player bets $25 a hand on the banker for 10,000 hands, the
1.06% house advantage per hand dealt results in a casino expected win of about $2,645 (.010579 x
10,000 hands dealt x $25 per hand). Applying the 1.17% house advantage per resolved bet to the untied
hands yields – aside from rounding error – the same expected win (.011692 x 9,048 resolved bets x $25
per bet = $2,645). Obviously, a similar equivalency exists for the player bet.
The vitality for baccarat since it is a game favored by high rollers and represents one of the few
situations where the casino can be put in a high-risk situation. This section elaborates further on
For the sake of simplicity, the analysis that follows assumes an overall game standard deviation of 0.94
per unit and a casino advantage of 1.15%, the values for a large series of bets equally divided between
player and banker. Actual total casino win over the course of many hands will deviate from the expected
win by an amount that depends on the per unit standard deviation, the amount wagered per hand, and
the number of hands. Mathematically speaking, in repeated series of n equal wagers, the distribution of
outcomes of total dollars won will be normally distributed (bell-shaped) around the expected win with
standard deviation equal to win per unit SD (Standard Deviation) = unit wager × n × SD.
Confidence limits for the actual win can be obtained from the following: () win Expected Win ± z × SD,
where z is the appropriate standard normal value depending on the confidence level. For the usual 95%
confidence, this is z = 1.96. Values of z corresponding to other confidence levels can found in a table of
standard normal probabilities. In a series of 1,000 hands at $500 per hand, for example, the expected
casino win is $5,750 (assuming a 1.15% house advantage), with an associated standard deviation.
of 94.0 ×$500× ,1 000 ≈ $14,863. The 95% confidence limits for the casino’s win are given by $5,750 ±
Casinos can increase the theoretical paybacks on slots by either increasing the number of winning
combinations or increasing the amounts of paybacks on winning combinations. A casino can do the
former on many slot machines by modifying the computer chip that operates the game to produce more
or higher paying winning combinations. A casino can do the latter by increasing the paybacks on
combinations. For example, the payout on lining up four bars may be increased from 100 coins to 200
coins. In either case, over time, the casino decreases the theoretical win, pays out more in winnings and