RPT 12 07
RPT 12 07
RPT 12 07
REACH – Analytical
characterisation of
petroleum UVCB
substances
REACH – Analytical
characterisation of
petroleum UVCB
substances
Prepared for CONCAWE’s PP/Analytical Information Task Force by:
R. de Graaff
S. Forbes
J.-P. Gennart
M.J. Gimeno Cortes
H. Hovius
D. King
H. Kleise
C. Martinez Martin
L. Montanari
M. Pinzuti
H. Pollack
P. Ruggieri
M. Thomas
A. Walton
CONCAWE
Brussels
October 2012
I
report no. 7/12
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this report is to summarise the findings of the scientific and technical
work undertaken by CONCAWE to assess the feasibility and potential benefit of
characterising petroleum UVCB1 substances beyond the recommendations issued
by CONCAWE for the substance identification of petroleum substances under
REACH.
KEYWORDS
INTERNET
NOTE
Considerable efforts have been made to assure the accuracy and reliability of the information
contained in this publication. However, neither CONCAWE nor any company participating in
CONCAWE can accept liability for any loss, damage or injury whatsoever resulting from the use
of this information.
This report does not necessarily represent the views of any company participating in CONCAWE.
1
Substances of Unknown or Variable Composition, Complex reaction products or Biological
materials
II
report no. 7/12
CONTENTS Page
SUMMARY IV
III
report no. 7/12
SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to summarise the findings of the scientific and technical
work undertaken by CONCAWE to assess the feasibility and potential benefit of
characterising petroleum UVCB substances beyond the recommendations issued by
CONCAWE for the substance identification of petroleum substances under REACH.
Section 3: provides a series of case studies for six petroleum substance categories
(low boiling point naphthas, kerosines, heavy fuel oils, other lubricant base oils,
residual aromatic extracts and bitumens) to illustrate the value of the information
derived from each analytical procedure, and provide an explanation for why some
techniques are not scientifically necessary.
IV
report no. 7/12
The REACH regulation (Annex VI, item 2) states that "For each substance, the
information given in this section shall be sufficient to enable each substance to be
identified. If it is not technically possible or if it does not appear scientifically
necessary to give information on one or more of the items below, the reasons shall
be clearly stated."
Annex VI item 2 lists some eighteen sub-items to be considered for the identification
of a substance and refers to specific analytical information requirements, namely:
1
According to the June 2011 guidance entitled “Questions and answers on inquiry and substance
identification (ECHA-11-QA-02-EN)” registrants are guided to provide either a High Pressure Liquid
Chromatogram or a Gas Chromatogram.
1
report no. 7/12
As shown in the figure below, the lightest petroleum substances, such as LPG, are
composed of relatively few hydrocarbon components but with increasing carbon
number the complexity increases exponentially such that naphthas (~C4-C12 range
hydrocarbons) contain a few hundred individual compounds and kerosines (~C9-C16
range hydrocarbons) contain several thousand components. Gas oils contain
hundreds of thousands of components and the heavier refinery products (e.g.
lubricating oils; heavy fuel oils; bitumen) are considered to contain many millions of
individual chemical compounds. The rapid increase in complexity with carbon
number arises from the vast number of isomers encountered in hydrocarbon
chemistry but increased carbon number can also lead to increased chemical
functionality (e.g. the presence of aromatic species in molecules containing six or
more carbon atoms), and the higher molecular weight components can even contain
several different chemical functionalities (e.g. naphthenic, aromatic, paraffinic, etc.,).
Petroleum Substances
Possible
Structures
101
C OO H
HO O C
104
H O OC
N
HO
N
S N
O
N S
N O
S
O
S N
O C OO H S
HO N O
HO O C
O
S
N
S N
O S
S O
S
S S
S S
S S
S
N
H
S N
H S
S
S
S S
N N
N N H
H H H
N
N H
S H
S S
106
S O
S
S
Reproduction permitted
with due acknowledgement
This guidance encouraged the use of standard industry methods for characterising
petroleum UVCB substances because these methods have been developed and
validated by the petroleum industry, and are accepted by the competent authorities
2
report no. 7/12
and customers because they provide a strong technical basis for confirming
consistent product quality and assessing potential health, safety and environmental
hazards associated with these materials. Appendix 1a illustrates the vast number
and range of standard methods issued by the Energy Institute (formerly the Institute
of Petroleum or IP), the UK professional body for the energy industry and one of
several national or global organisations maintaining standard methods for petroleum
substances. Many of these methods are harmonised with those of other
organisations (e.g. ASTM, DIN, EN, ISO etc.) and methods are continually being
developed, reviewed, updated or deleted depending on industry sector requirements
and measurement technologies available. Appendix 1b lists the standard methods
considered most relevant by CONCAWE for the characterisation of petroleum
UVCB substances for REACH.
The CONCAWE guidance confirmed that analytical data should be based on a spot
sample of the production or imported substance to provide the following general
information as required by Section 4.3.2.2 of the ECHA Guidance for identification
and naming of substances under REACH [1]:
It was recognized that both the REACH regulation and the ECHA guidance allow for
the possibility to waive data for the methods included in Annex VI to REACH on the
basis of technical feasibility or scientific justification. CONCAWE guidance
recommended the provision of analytical information considered sufficient to identify
petroleum substances and ensure assignment within the appropriate Petroleum
Substance Category, for the purposes of hazard classification and risk assessment.
Registrants were recommended to enter in Subsection 1.4 of the IUCLID dossier a
3
report no. 7/12
waiving statement for the spectral or chromatographic methods not applied as they
were not considered scientifically necessary to identify the substance.
4
report no. 7/12
5
report no. 7/12
The low-energy region of the spectrum (400-1500 cm-1) is known as the “fingerprint”
region because it is particularly characteristic for each compound and can therefore
be useful for assessing the purity of simple substances. As for UV spectroscopy, IR
spectroscopy of liquid substances is usually carried out either as a dilute solution in
a suitable (non-absorbing) solvent or directly using a short path-length
measurement cell. Samples can also be examined directly by attenuated total
reflectance measurements.
6
report no. 7/12
13
C NMR
Chemical shift Carbon type Environment
9-60 ppm alkyl
14 ppm terminal methyl CH3-CH2-CH2-CH2-
19 ppm internal methyl -CH2-CH(CH3)-CH2-
23 ppm methylene CH3-CH2-CH2-CH2-
30 ppm methylene CH3-CH2-CH2-(CH2)n-
32 ppm methylene CH3-CH2-CH2-CH2-
35-45 ppm branched and cyclic
100-130 ppm aromatic (tertiary) and olefinic (tertiary and secondary)
130-150 ppm aromatic and olefinic (quaternary)
Other nuclei which generate signals include 19F, 29Si and 31P although these have
little relevance for characterising petroleum UVCB substances which consist
predominantly of hydrocarbons. In addition to providing detailed structural
information, including discriminating between certain isomers, NMR provides
quantitative information on the different types of nuclei present (e.g. CH, CH2 and
CH3 protons) and is therefore also employed for assessing the purity of simple
substances. A range of signal enhancement techniques can also be used to provide
greater discrimination and more structural information about the substance under
investigation. The majority of NMR measurements are carried out on solutions of the
test substance in a deuterated (2H) solvent such as deuterochloroform. Modern
high-field instruments (e.g. 500 MHz) enable most proton NMR spectra to be
7
report no. 7/12
obtained within a few minutes whereas it may take several hours to obtain a carbon
NMR spectrum owing to the relatively small quantity of 13C present in the sample.
Although interpretation of complex NMR spectra requires considerable expertise,
extensive libraries of reference spectra and predictive computer programs facilitate
the routine identification of simple substances.
Molecular spectroscopic techniques, such as IR, NMR and MS, have extensive on-
line spectral libraries of pure mono-constituent compounds against which a
spectrum of an unknown substance can be compared for identification purposes.
Such libraries are extremely helpful for MS investigations and the search engines
will usually provide probability indicators to show how well the spectrum of an
unknown substance compares with the library spectra of supposedly
identical/similar substances.
8
report no. 7/12
GC is used to separate multi- constituent and complex substances and thus provide
information on the number, and to some extent the nature, of constituents present.
GC is mainly used to separate lipophilic (non-polar) constituents and the separation
is highly dependent on the relative volatility of the constituents present. Constituents
are separated as they are carried in a gas stream through columns packed or
coated with special adsorbent materials and constituents are detected as they elute
from these columns using universal (e.g. flame ionisation) or selective (e.g. MS,
electron capture) detection systems.
9
report no. 7/12
The lighter petroleum UVCB substances like naphthas and gasoline, which typically
contain a few hundred individual constituents in the ~C4-C12 range, can be
comprehensively characterised by Detailed Hydrocarbon Analysis (DHA) GC or
Reformulyzer-GC analysis. DHA uses temperature-programmed, high-resolution,
capillary column GC analysis to resolve all the hydrocarbons present such that each
individual constituent can be identified (by retention matching) and quantified.
Reformulyzer-GC analysis is a multi-dimensional chromatographic technique in
which a series of special column-coupling and column-switching procedures are
employed to separate the constituents into different hydrocarbon groups (e.g. n-
alkanes; iso-alkanes; cyclo-alkanes/naphthenes; aromatics) prior to final resolution
of the individual constituents. By modifications to the instrument configuration and
operating conditions it is possible to optimise the separation depending on the
specific characteristics of the petroleum substance under investigation. DHA-GC
and Reformulyzer-GC are unable to resolve the many thousands of constituents
present in the heavier middle-distillate petroleum substances, such as kerosine
(~C9-C16 range hydrocarbons) and diesel fuel (~C11-C25 range hydrocarbons).
10
report no. 7/12
For hydrocarbons, HPLC generally provides greater selectivity between the different
classes of constituents than GC, but much poorer resolution of the constituents
within a class than GC. However, both HPLC and the more recently developed ultra-
performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) give much higher resolution than is
possible with the open-column LC separations still widely used in the petroleum
industry for isolating different classes of compounds.
11
report no. 7/12
2
ASTM D5186-03(2009) : Standard Test Method for Determination of Aromatic Content and Polynuclear
Aromatic Content of Diesel Fuels and Aviation Turbine Fuels by Supercritical Fluid Chromatography.
12
report no. 7/12
3. CASE STUDIES
13
report no. 7/12
The UV/Visible spectrum shows that the sample contains aromatic and/or olefinic
hydrocarbons on account of the strong absorbance bands at wavelengths below
~250 nm. This sample was heavily diluted with hexane to give a sample
concentration of ~10 ppm prior to measurement. Given that DHA-GC shows this
sample contains 7.7% (m/m) aromatics and 0.6% (m/m) olefins, it can be assumed
that the UV absorbance results from ~1 ppm aromatic/olefinic hydrocarbons. It is not
therefore surprising that virtually every petroleum UVCB substance yields a UV
spectrum showing very strong absorbance at wavelengths below ~250 nm.
Moreover, this absorbance cannot be attributed to a single chemical constituent but
is likely to have resulted from several constituents, possibly with widely varying
extinction coefficients, and it is therefore impossible to make any accurate
quantitative measurement from the UV spectrum obtained on the naphtha sample.
The 1H NMR spectrum provides more information on the composition of the naphtha
sample than IR spectroscopy. NMR confirms the presence of saturated, aromatic
and olefinic moieties and therefore has the advantage over IR that it can
discriminate between aromatic and olefinic functionalities present in a sample.
Moreover, NMR is an accurate quantitative technique and the integrated spectrum
shows that the vast majority of the measured signal (0.2-2 ppm chemical shift)
arises from protons associated with saturated bonds but there is also a low
percentage of protons associated with aromatic nuclei (2-4.5 ppm and 6-8 ppm
chemical shift) and a trace of olefinic protons (4.5-6 ppm chemical shift). These
results therefore do not contribute further to the information obtained on this sample
by DHA-GC. Furthermore, care must be taken when interpreting quantitative NMR
data because in this case the value for aromatic protons (6-8 ppm chemical shift)
refers only to the percentage of hydrogen atoms in the aromatic rings of the
molecules present relative to the total hydrogen content of the substance, the
hydrogen atoms present in the substituent side chains of the aromatic rings not
being included in this chemical shift region.
14
report no. 7/12
HPLC provides quantitative information on the basic aromatic classes (mono-, di-
and tri+) present in the kerosine sample and shows that the vast majority of
aromatic constituents are mono-aromatic hydrocarbons:
The proton and carbon NMR spectra show that both saturated alkyl chains and
aromatic moieties are present in this sample. 13C NMR analysis also shows that the
total aromatic carbon content of the sample (i.e. the percentage of carbon atoms in
aromatic rings relative to the total carbon content) is 12.4% but, unlike the HPLC
value of 20.6%, this value does not include carbon atoms present in substituent side
chains of the aromatic rings. As shown by HPLC, the majority of aromatic species
present in the kerosine sample are mono-aromatic constituents, each of which
contains six aromatic ring carbon atoms. GC analysis shows that the sample has a
mean carbon number of ~C11 and, assuming that the aromatic constituents present
are distributed proportionally throughout the whole carbon number range, the NMR
aromatic value of 12.4% is approximately equivalent to a total aromatic value of
11/6 x 12.4% = 22.7% which is consistent with the value of 20.6% determined by
HPLC.
The UV/Visible spectrum shows that the sample contains aromatic constituents,
based on the absorbance band at 259 nm. However, given that kerosine typically
contains several thousand individual constituents (based on the number of possible
isomers for the range of carbon numbers represented), amongst which there is a
wide range of aromatic constituents, it is inevitable that the extinction coefficients for
individual aromatic constituents will vary considerably. Consequently it is not
feasible to use UV spectroscopy to obtain a quantitative measurement of the
concentration of the total aromatic constituents present in this petroleum UVCB
substance.
The IR spectrum indicates that both saturated alkyl chains and aromatic moieties
are present. However, as with UV spectroscopy, these bands cannot be attributed to
individual hydrocarbon constituents and arise from the gross chemical functionalities
present in this complex UVCB substance. Consequently it is not feasible to use IR
spectroscopy to obtain a quantitative measurement of the concentration of aromatic
and/or saturated hydrocarbons present in the kerosine sample.
15
report no. 7/12
SIMDIS-GC data show that the boiling range of the heavy fuel oil sample is between
264.8°C and 715.3°C for the 5% to 90% boiling fraction; 10% of the sample boils
above 715.3°C and its boiling range cannot be quantified. This corresponds to a
carbon number range of C14-C98 for the 5% to 90% fraction with the 10% higher
boiling fraction containing heavier components (>C100).
HPLC shows that the heavy fuel oil sample contains 11.7% (m/m) mono-aromatic,
3.9% (m/m) di-aromatic, and 26.8% (m/m) tri-aromatic and tri-+ hydrocarbons; and
by difference 57.6% (m/m) non-aromatic hydrocarbons. From the spectroscopic
analysis of the sample, proton NMR shows it to contain aliphatic and olefinic
components together with mono- and poly-aromatic moieties whereas the IR
spectrum indicates that both saturated alkyl chains and aromatic functionalities are
present. However, as with all petroleum UVCB substances, these bands cannot be
attributed to individual constituents present in the heavy fuel oil. The UV/Visible
spectrum shows that the sample contains aromatic and/or olefinic hydrocarbons on
account of the strong absorbance bands at wavelengths below ~300 nm. Given that
HPLC analysis indicates that the sample contains 42.4% (m/m) total aromatics, it is
not surprising that it had to be heavily diluted with toluene prior to measurement to
give a sample concentration of ~40 ppm and this again demonstrates that UV
spectroscopy has little value for the characterisation of most petroleum UVCB
substances.
16
report no. 7/12
SIMDIS-GC data show that the base oil sample contains components predominantly
in the C15-C31 carbon number range and with initial and final boiling points of 304°C
and 436°C respectively.
Preparative HPLC shows that the base oil contains 65.4% (m/m) saturated
hydrocarbons and 33.4% (m/m) aromatic hydrocarbons, corresponding to a sample
recovery of 98.8% (m/m) from the chromatographic fractionation.
The proton and carbon NMR spectra show that both saturated alkyl chains and
aromatic moieties are present in this sample. 13C NMR analysis also shows that the
total aromatic carbon content of the sample (i.e. the percentage of carbon atoms in
aromatic rings relative to the total carbon content) is 9.2% but, unlike the HPLC
value of 33.4%, this value does not include carbon atoms present in substituent side
chains of the aromatic rings. GC analysis shows that the base oil sample has a
mean carbon number of ~C23 and, assuming that the majority of aromatic species
present are mono-aromatic compounds each containing six aromatic ring carbon
atoms and that these are distributed proportionally throughout the whole carbon
number range, the NMR aromatic value of 9.2% is approximately equivalent to a
total aromatic value of 23/6 x 9.2% = 35.3% which is consistent with the value of
33.4% determined by HPLC.
The UV/Visible spectrum shows that the sample contains aromatic and/or olefinic
hydrocarbons on account of the strong absorbance at wavelengths below ~300 nm.
However, given that this type of lubricant base oil typically contains millions of
individual components including a wide range of aromatic hydrocarbons, it is
inevitable that the extinction coefficients for individual aromatic constituents will vary
considerably. Consequently it is not feasible to use UV spectroscopy to obtain a
quantitative measurement of the concentration of the individual aromatic
constituents present in this petroleum UVCB substance.
The IR spectrum indicates that both saturated alkyl chains and aromatic moieties
are present. However, as with UV spectroscopy, these bands cannot be attributed to
individual hydrocarbon constituents and arise from the gross chemical functionalities
present in this complex UVCB substance. Consequently it is not feasible to use IR
spectroscopy to obtain a quantitative measurement of the concentration of individual
aromatic and/or saturated hydrocarbons present in the base oil sample.
17
report no. 7/12
From the UV/Visible spectrum obtained on Sample A it appears that the sample
contains aromatic and/or olefinic hydrocarbons on account of the very strong
absorbance bands at wavelengths below ~350 nm. Despite the fact that this sample
was heavily diluted with dichloromethane and examined using a short path length
cell it produced very strong UV absorbance bands in common with all the other
petroleum UVCB substances described here. The IR spectrum of the same sample
indicates the presence of both saturated and aromatic bonds.
18
report no. 7/12
The proton NMR spectrum obtained on Sample A confirms the presence of aliphatic
and aromatic moieties and indicates that no significant concentration of olefinic
protons are present. In this case no integration of the signals was made due to
severe peak overlaps, which is indicative of the very high complexity of substances
such as bitumen. UV spectroscopy on the same sample shows that it contains
aromatic and/or olefinic hydrocarbons on account of the strong absorbance band at
~240 nm and, in common with the other substances examined by this technique, the
sample had to be very heavily diluted with chloroform (sample concentration
40 ppm) to provide an on-scale spectrum. The IR spectrum of this sample indicates
the presence of both saturated and aromatic bonds.
Bitumen is the heaviest and most chemically complex of the petroleum UVCB
substance categories containing many millions of individual hydrocarbon
constituents. Distillation enables us to determine the boiling range of this substance
whereas SIMDIS-GC provides information on the carbon number distribution and
boiling range. Quantitative information on the basic chemical classes present in
bitumen, such as saturates, aromatics and polar materials, can be obtained by LC
or TLC-FID although, given the great complexity of this substance, it should be
noted that some individual components contain more than one chemical
functionality. NMR is the most useful of the three spectroscopic techniques applied
in this examination with no additional useful information being provided by UV or IR
spectroscopy.
19
report no. 7/12
The technical data presented in the appendices to this report also illustrate that
there is little, if any, difference between the UV, IR, or NMR spectra obtained on
samples from different categories of petroleum UVCB substances, particularly for
the heavier materials. This observation is confirmed by investigation of the vast
quantity of spectroscopic information generated on other samples by CONCAWE
Member Companies and, given this general lack of differentiation both within and
between substance categories, provides further justification for waiving these
techniques as being scientifically unnecessary for the identification of petroleum
UVCB substances.
20
report no. 7/12
(i) DHA-GC and/or Low Boiling Point Naphthas (i) Full characterisation of
Reformulyzer-GC components
(i) SIMDIS-GC or Distillation Swedish Mk1 Diesel Fuel, (i) Carbon number range and/or
(ii) HPLC or LC Straight-Run Gas Oils, boiling range
Cracked Gas Oils, (ii) Aromatic classes (HPLC) or total
Vacuum and Hydrocracked aromatics (LC)
Gas Oils and Distillate Fuels,
Other Gas Oils
(i) SIMDIS-GC Heavy Fuel Oil Components, (i) Carbon number and boiling
(ii) HPLC or LC or NMR Highly Refined Base Oils ranges
(ii) Aromatic classes (HPLC) or total
aromatics (LC or NMR)
(i) SIMDIS-GC Unrefined/Acid Treated Oils, (i) Carbon number and boiling
(ii) LC or NMR Foots Oils, ranges
Paraffin and Hydrocarbon (ii) Total aromatics
Waxes,
Slack Waxes,
Petrolatums,
Untreated Distillate Aromatic
Extracts,
Residual Aromatic Extracts
(i) SIMDIS-GC Other Lubricant Base Oils (i) Carbon number and boiling
(ii) HPLC or LC ranges
(ii) Total aromatics
Note: In addition to the Annex VI techniques listed above, IP 346 is used for Foot’s Oils, Other Lubricant Base Oils and
Treated Distillate Aromatic Extracts as a classification marker for the determination of carcinogenicity. Similarly, ASTM E
1687-04 is used as a classification marker for the determination of carcinogenicity for Residual Aromatic Extracts.
21
report no. 7/12
5. GLOSSARY
Asphaltenes Components of crude oil that are insoluble in n-pentane (at a specific
dilution ratio) and re-dissolve in toluene. They consist primarily of carbon,
hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur, and have molecular masses in the
400-1500 range.
Category A specific group of petroleum UVCB substances with similar properties and
chemical composition (e.g. kerosines).
Chromophore A group of atoms and bonds in a chemical compound that are responsible
for the colour of the compound.
Determinant The property that is being measured by the analytical method (e.g. mono-
aromatic content)
EC European Commission
EN European Norm
GC Gas Chromatography
22
report no. 7/12
Hydrophilic 'Water loving'. Having an affinity for, tending to combine with, or capable of
dissolving in water or other polar solvents.
IR Infra-Red
Isomers Compounds having the same type and number of atoms but in different
molecular arrangements.
LC Liquid Chromatography
Lipophilic 'Fat loving'. Having an affinity for, tending to combine with, or capable of
dissolving in lipids or other apolar solvents.
Nm Nanometer.
MS Mass Spectrometry.
Resins Components of crude oil that are insoluble in propane but not in n-heptane.
23
report no. 7/12
UV Ultra-Violet
24
report no. 7/12
6. REFERENCES
1. ECHA (2012) Guidance for identification and naming of substances under REACH.
Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency (http://guidance.echa.europe.eu/)
2. CEN (2008) Automotive fuels – unleaded petrol – requirements and test methods.
EN 228:2008. Brussels: Comité Européen de Normalisation
4. Ministry of Defence (2008) Turbine fuel, aviation kerosine type, Jet A-1. NATO
Code: F-35. Joint Service Designation: AVTUR. Def Stan 91-91. Issue 6. Glasgow:
UK Ministry of Defence
25
report no. 7/12
18 obsolete
Demulsibility characteristics
19/03 SC-C-4 19:03
of lubricating oil
20 superseded by IP 295
21 obsolete
26
report no. 7/12
27
report no. 7/12
28
report no. 7/12
29
report no. 7/12
30
report no. 7/12
31
report no. 7/12
32
report no. 7/12
33
report no. 7/12
34
report no. 7/12
35
report no. 7/12
36
report no. 7/12
37
report no. 7/12
452 obsolete
38
report no. 7/12
Bitumen characterisation of
457/00e SC-E 457:00:00 1425:99
perceptible properties
Recovered binder and oil
458/09e from bitumen emulsions by SC-E 458:09:00 1431:09
distillation
Bitumen paraffin wax content 459:07 Part
459 Part 1/07e SC-E 12606-1:07
by distillation 1
Bitumen paraffin wax content 459:00 Part
459 Part 2/00e SC-E 12606-2:99
by extraction 2
Bitumen resistance to 460:07 Part
460 Part 1/07e SC-E 12607-1:07
hardening RTFOT 1
Bitumen resistance to 460:07 Part
460 Part 2/07e SC-E 12607-2:07
hardening TFOT 2
Bitumen resistance to 460:07 Part
460 Part 3/07e SC-E 12607-3:07
hardening RFT 3
Bitumen preparation of test
461/07e SC-E 461:07:00 12594:07
samples
39
report no. 7/12
40
report no. 7/12
523/05 Flash point rapid equilibrium SC-B-4 523:04:00 ISO 3679:04 3679:04:00
41
report no. 7/12
42
report no. 7/12
Determination of FAME in
579/10 middle distillates - Infrared SC-G-4 579:09:00 14078:09
spectrometry method
Water mix metal working
fluids thermal and emulsion
580/10 SC-C-5
stability and foaming
characteristics
Determination of P, Cu and S
581/11 SC-G-3 581:09:00 15837:09
content by ICP-OES
Determination of boiling
582/11 range distribution, GC SC-G-6 582:10:00 ISO 3924:10 3924:10:00
method
FAME in AVTUR - FTIR
583/10 SC-G-4
rapid screening method
Determination of the fracture
toughness temperature by a
584/10e SC-E 584:10:00 15963:10
three point bending test on a
notched specimen
43
report no. 7/12
44
Method Title Analyte(s) Scope Comments
DISTILLATION
GAS ANALYSIS BY GC
Commercial propane and butane – Analysis saturated and unsaturated C2, hydrocarbons >0.1% (m/m) in
EN 27941 / ISO 7941
by gas chromatography C3, C4 and C5 hydrocarbons LPG
PETROLEUM UVCB SUBSTANCES
Detailed Analysis of Petroleum Naphthas hydrocarbon components of individual components <151 C; components eluting after n-
ASTM D5134 through n-Nonane by Capillary Gas petroleum naphthas (including suitable for samples containing nonane (BP 151 C) determined
Chromatography n-hexane and BTEX) <2% olefins as a single group
report no. 7/12
45
46
Determination of Individual Components in hydrocarbon components
individual components <225 C;
Spark Ignition Engine Fuels by 100 Metre (including n-hexane and BTEX)
ASTM D6729 suitable for samples containing
Capillary High Resolution Gas and oxygenates (e.g. MeOH,
<25% olefins
Chromatography EtOH, BuOH, MTBE, ETBE, TAME)
specific temperatures
calibration against n-alkane
Boiling Range Distribution of Gasoline and representing 1% ... 99% sample
ASTM D3710 FBP <260 C standards covering boiling
Gasoline Fractions by Gas Chromatography recovery and 0.5% (IBP) and
range of sample
99.5% (FBP)
specific temperatures
Determination of the Boiling Range calibration against hydrocarbon
representing 1% ... 99% sample
ASTM D7096 Distribution of Gasoline by Wide-Bore FBP <280 C standards covering boiling
recovery and 0.5% (IBP) and
Capillary Gas Chromatography range of sample
99.5% (FBP)
report no. 7/12
47
48
HYDROCARBON CLASS ANALYSIS BY LC
49
50
HYDROCARBON CLASS ANALYSIS BY SOLVENT EXTRACTION
Determination of polycyclic aromatics in gravimetric measurement of
IBP >300 C (5% recovered
unused lubricating base oils and asphaltene polycyclic aromatic analyte; correlation between IP
sample); suitable for samples
IP 346 free petroleum fractions – Dimethyl hydrocarbons (three or more 346 results and in-vitro
containing 1-15% polycyclic
sulfoxide extraction refractive index fused rings) mutagenicity measurements
aromatics
method (Ames Test)
VISCOSITY MEASUREMENT
DENSITY MEASUREMENT
51
report no. 7/12
2.2. IR Spectroscopy
Instrument: Thermo Nicolet Magna 550 FTIR Instrument with ATR accessory
Number of scans: 64
Spectral resolution: 4 cm-1
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
Abs orbance
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
3000 2500 2000 1500 1000
Wavenumbers (cm-1)
52
report no. 7/12
7.297
2.336
2.299
2.250
1.686
1.676
1.672
1.668
1.649
1.634
1.555
1.522
1.459
1.449
1.437
1.360
1.353
1.335
1.314
1.293
1.267
1.257
1.241
1.232
1.217
1.201
1.194
1.188
1.181
1.171
1.165
1.150
1.001
0.996
0.975
0.957
0.954
0.945
0.924
0.920
0.903
0.897
0.887
0.882
0.875
0.866
0.855
0.848
0.841
0.838
0.831
0.019
12 10 8 6 4 2 0 PPM
53
report no. 7/12
54
report no. 7/12
55
report no. 7/12
56
report no. 7/12
57
report no. 7/12
58
report no. 7/12
59
report no. 7/12
60
report no. 7/12
61
report no. 7/12
Sample Chromatogram
62
report no. 7/12
Sample Chromatogram
63
report no. 7/12
Sample Chromatogram
64
report no. 7/12
Sample Chromatogram
65
report no. 7/12
Sample Chromatogram
66
report no. 7/12
Sample Chromatogram
Continuation of chromatogram
from previous page - no peaks
detected in this section of the
chromatogram
67
report no. 7/12
Sample Chromatogram
Continuation of chromatogram
from previous page - no peaks
detected in this section of the
chromatogram
68
report no. 7/12
Sample Chromatogram
Continuation of chromatogram
from previous page - no peaks
detected in this section of the
chromatogram
69
report no. 7/12
Sample Chromatogram
Continuation of chromatogram
from previous page - no peaks
detected in this section of the
chromatogram
70
report no. 7/12
Sample Chromatogram
Continuation of chromatogram
from previous page - no peaks
detected in this section of the
chromatogram
71
report no. 7/12
-
3.0
2.5
2.0
Absorbance (A)
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
200.0 300.0 400.0 500.0 600.0 700.0 800.0 900.0
-0.5
Wavelength (nm)
The UV/Visible spectrum shows that the kerosine sample contains aromatic components.
72
report no. 7/12
3.2. IR Spectroscopy
73
report no. 7/12
1
2H Spectrum
)
7.21
7.11
7.08
7.05
6.99
2.31
2.28
2.27
2.26
2.22
1.26
0.88
0.88
0.87
0.86
0.85
8.0 7.5 7.0 ppm
4.02
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ppm
4.02
95.98
74
report no. 7/12
13
C Spectrum
23623h - (166)
Jet A-1 13SC008
77.39
77.07
76.75
39.69
34.72
32.61
32.29
30.09
30.04
29.99
29.78
29.75
29.69
28.26
23.34
23.00
22.84
22.79
22.75
20.43
19.32
14.53
14.29
150 140 130 120 ppm
12.44
87.56
The NMR spectra show that the kerosine sample is comprised of saturated and aromatic
hydrocarbon components and contains 4.0% aromatic hydrogen (protons in the aromatic
ring as a percentage of total proton content) and 12.4% aromatic carbon (carbons in the
aromatic ring as a percentage of total carbon content). These values refer only to those
nuclei within the aromatic rings of components present in the sample and do not include the
nuclei present in substituent side chains.
75
report no. 7/12
SIMDIS-GC analysis was carried out according to IP 480/07. The sample was dissolved in
carbon disulphide and analysed by temperature programmed GC with flame ionisation
detection using a non-polar separation column. The resulting chromatogram was compared
with a calibration chromatogram obtained under identical conditions using n-alkanes
spanning the elution range of the hydrocarbons present in the sample. The boiling range
distribution of the components present was determined from these data.
76
report no. 7/12
SIMDIS GC analysis shows that the kerosine sample contains components distributed over
the C7-18 carbon number and 99-295°C boiling ranges.
77
report no. 7/12
The sample was examined directly by GCxGC using the following operating conditions:
Detector : Flame-ionisation
Temperature 350 °C
Make-up gas Helium
Make-up flow 20 mL/min
Hydrogen flow 35 mL/min
Air flow 350 mL/min
78
report no. 7/12
The individual components found by GCxGC were grouped both on the basis of carbon
number (C5 to C25) and the following chemical functionalities:
normal paraffins
iso-paraffins
mono-naphthenics
di-naphthenics
mono-aromatics
naphthenic mono-aromatics
di-aromatics
naphthenic di-aromatics
7.5
5.0
2nd Dimension Relative RT (sec)
2.5
0.0
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175
79
report no. 7/12
80
report no. 7/12
HPLC analysis (IP 391 method) shows that the kerosine sample contains 19.1% (m/m)
mono-aromatic, 1.5% (m/m) di-aromatic and <0.1% (m/m) tri+aromatic hydrocarbons.
81
report no. 7/12
82
report no. 7/12
4.2. IR Spectroscopy
Instrument: Thermo Nicolet Magna 550 FTIR Instrument with ATR accessory
Number of scans: 32
Spectral resolution: 4 cm-1
83
report no. 7/12
84
report no. 7/12
85
report no. 7/12
86
report no. 7/12
2.5
2.0
Absorbance (A)
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
200.0 300.0 400.0 500.0 600.0 700.0 800.0 900.0
-0.5
Wavelength (nm)
The UV/Visible spectrum shows that the sample contains aromatic components.
87
report no. 7/12
5.2. IR Spectroscopy
88
report no. 7/12
1
2H Spectrum
L
7.20
7.10
6.96
2.32
2.28
2.18
2.17
1.71
1.52
1.51
1.49
1.48
1.26
1.16
1.08
0.96
0.94
0.88
0.87
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 ppm
2.59
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ppm
2.59
97.41
89
report no. 7/12
13
C NMR spectrum
23034e (459)
LVI 60
77.34
77.02
76.70
37.51
37.23
34.47
32.84
32.39
32.06
30.19
29.87
29.52
28.04
26.87
22.81
22.72
19.75
14.49
155 150 145 140 135 130 125 120 115 ppm
9.17
90.83
9.17
The NMR spectra show that the base oil sample is comprised of saturated and aromatic
hydrocarbon components and contains 2.6% aromatic hydrogen (protons in the aromatic
ring as a percentage of total proton content) and 9.2% aromatic carbon (carbons in the
aromatic ring as a percentage of total carbon content). These values refer only to those
nuclei within the aromatic rings of components present in the sample and do not include the
nuclei present in substituent side chains.
90
report no. 7/12
SIMDIS-GC analysis was carried out according to IP 480/07. The sample was dissolved in
carbon disulphide and analysed by temperature programmed GC with flame ionisation
detection using a non-polar separation column. The resulting chromatogram was compared
with a calibration chromatogram obtained under identical conditions using n-alkanes
spanning the elution range of the hydrocarbons present in the sample. The boiling range
distribution of the components present was determined from these data.
91
report no. 7/12
SIMDIS-GC analysis showed that the sample contains hydrocarbons covering the C15 to C31
range corresponding with initial and final boiling points of 304°C and 436°C respectively. The
boiling point distribution plot and table showing the boiling point for each 5% mass fraction of
the sample are shown below.
92
report no. 7/12
HPLC analysis was carried out using a slightly modified version of IP 368/01 in which
pentane rather than hexane was used as the mobile phase. A solution of the sample in
pentane was separated into saturated and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions using normal-
phase HPLC with refractive index detection. Following emergence of the saturated
hydrocarbons from the column a backflush valve was activated and the aromatic
hydrocarbons collected by reverse-elution. The pentane mobile phase was evaporated from
the two fractions and the hydrocarbon types determined gravimetrically.
HPLC analysis of the sample showed that it contains 65.4% (m/m) saturated hydrocarbons
and 33.4% (m/m) aromatic hydrocarbons, corresponding to a sample recovery of 98.8%
(m/m) from the chromatographic fractionation.
93
report no. 7/12
SAMPLE A
2.5
2.0
Absorbance (A)
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
200.0 300.0 400.0 500.0 600.0 700.0 800.0 900.0
-0.5
Wavelength (nm)
94
report no. 7/12
6.2. IR Spectroscopy
95
report no. 7/12
1
H Spectrum
23329e - REACH Registration
BF Extract (144)
7.24
1.54
1.25
1.08
0.89
0.88
0.86
0.85
8.8 8.6 8.4 8.2 8.0 7.8 7.6 7.4 7.2 7.0 6.8 6.6 6.4 ppm
6.65
9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 ppm
6.65
93.35
96
report no. 7/12
13
C Spectrum
23329e - REACH Registration
BF Extract (144)
77.37
77.05
76.74
37.39
37.13
32.75
31.98
30.10
29.44
27.14
22.74
19.72
14.17
150 140 130 120 110 ppm
26.12
73.88
Quantitative analysis of the NMR signals showed that the sample contains 6.6% aromatic
hydrogen (protons in the aromatic ring as a percentage of total proton content), and 26.1%
aromatic carbon (carbons in the aromatic ring as a percentage of total carbon content).
These values refer only to those nuclei within the aromatic rings of components present in
the sample and do not include the nuclei present in substituent side chains.
97
report no. 7/12
SIMDIS-GC analysis was carried out according to IP 480/07. The sample was dissolved in
carbon disulphide and analysed by temperature programmed GC with flame ionisation
detection using a non-polar separation column. The resulting chromatogram was compared
with a calibration chromatogram obtained under identical conditions using n-alkanes
spanning the elution range of the hydrocarbons present in the sample. The boiling range
distribution of the components present was determined from these data.
98
report no. 7/12
SIMDIS-GC analysis showed that the sample contains hydrocarbons covering the C25 to C95
range corresponding with initial and final boiling points of 423°C and 691°C respectively. The
boiling point distribution plot and boiling point distribution table for the sample are shown
below.
99
report no. 7/12
SAMPLE B
SIMDIS-GC was carried out on a solution of the sample dissolved in carbon disulphide. This
was analysed by temperature programmed GC with flame ionisation detection using a non-
polar separation column, and the resulting chromatogram was compared with a calibration
chromatogram obtained under identical conditions using n-alkanes spanning the elution
range of the hydrocarbons present in the sample. The boiling range distribution of the
components present was determined from these data.
100
report no. 7/12
SIMDIS-GC analysis showed that the sample contains hydrocarbons covering the 403°C
to >750°C boiling range, although 98% of the sample had a boiling range of 403°C to 702°C.
The boiling point distribution table for the sample is shown below.
101
report no. 7/12
102
report no. 7/12
103
report no. 7/12
7.2. IR Spectroscopy
104
report no. 7/12
Solvent: Deuterochloroform
105
report no. 7/12
7.4a. Distillation
Method: ASTM D 1160 (Standard Test Method for Distillation of Petroleum Products at
Reduced Pressure)
Instrument: Herzog HDV 632
Pressure: 0.13-6.7 kPa (1-50 mm Hg)
Heating: Controlled to ensure uniform distillate recovery of 6-8 mL/min achieved after
first 10% of distillate recovered
Data: Vapour temperature, time and pressure recorded and used to calculate
equivalent temperature at atmospheric pressure (AET)
106
report no. 7/12
Known mass of sample (0.1g) charged to top of glass chromatographic column packed with
activated alumina and silica gel:
Solvents removed by rotary evaporation (60°C; 120/357 mbar) and saturates, aromatics
and polar (resins + asphaltenes) fractions determined gravimetrically.
107
report no. 7/12
SAMPLE B
SIMDIS-GC analysis was carried out according to IP 480/07. The sample was dissolved in
carbon disulphide and analysed by temperature programmed GC with flame ionisation
detection using a non-polar separation column. The resulting chromatogram was compared
with a calibration chromatogram obtained under identical conditions using n-alkanes
spanning the elution range of the hydrocarbons present in the sample. The boiling range
distribution of the components present was determined from these data.
SIMDIS-GC analysis showed that the sample contains hydrocarbons covering the C25
to >C100 range corresponding with initial and final boiling points of 439°C and >750°C
respectively. The boiling point distribution table for the sample is shown below.
108
report no. 7/12
Recovery (% mass) IBP 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
B.P. ( degree C ) 439.0 491.0 509.5 523.5 535.5 547.0 558.0 569.0 580.5 592.0
50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 91%
604.5 617.0 631.0 645.5 662.0 680.0 700.0 720.0 742.0 750.0
109
report no. 7/12
TLC-FID analysis of the sample was carried out according to IP 469/01(2). The sample was
dissolved in dichloromethane and separated by TLC using silica rods and three successive
developments with the following mobile phases:
(i) heptane
Following evaporation of the final mobile phase, the rods were examined using an Iatroscan
Mark V TLC-FID Analyser and the quantities of saturates, aromatics, resins and asphaltenes
in the sample determined by internal normalisation of the resulting chromatogram.
The TLC-FID chromatogram has been annotated to show the peaks corresponding to the
saturates, aromatics, resins and asphaltenes present. Normalisation of these peaks showed
that the sample contains 10.6% (m/m) saturates, 65.4% (m/m) aromatics, 11.9% (m/m)
resins and 12.1% (m/m) asphaltenes.
110
report no. 7/12
111
CONCAWE
Boulevard du Souverain 165
B-1160 Brussels
Belgium
Tel: +32-2-566 91 60
Fax: +32-2-566 91 81
e-mail: info@concawe.org
website: http://www.concawe.org