Large Barkhausen Effect and Matteucci Effect I N Amorphous Magnetostrictive Wires For Pulse Generator Elements
Large Barkhausen Effect and Matteucci Effect I N Amorphous Magnetostrictive Wires For Pulse Generator Elements
Large Barkhausen Effect and Matteucci Effect I N Amorphous Magnetostrictive Wires For Pulse Generator Elements
5, SEPTEMBER1985 2017
ABSTUCT
I. INTRODUCTION
it Kyushu I n s t i t u t eo f Technology,Tobata,Kitakyushu
804, Japan.
Carnegie-Mellon University,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania
1521 3.
0018-9464/85/0900-2017$01.0001985 IEEE
2018
1Hz E
I R
H = 0.08 Oe 0.5 m s / d i v .
H (Oe)
F i g . 3 . Characteristics of v VS. H.
90
80
Pick
H m = l . O Oe) P
u coil
"0.1 1 10 100
f (Hz)
Fig.4. Characteristics o f ep vs. f.
Fig.6. Characteristics o f ep'vs. ntw.
The s e n s i t i v e M a t t e u c c i e f f e c t i n d u c e s s h a r p v o l t a g e REFERENCES
p u l s e s , e p ' , between t h e endsofthea-wire when it i s
i n an a c f i e l d of more than 0.1 Oe a t f r e q u e n c i e s 0.01 [ I ] K. Mohri, F.B. Humphrey, J. Yamasakiand K. Okamura
Hz - 10 H z (H >Hit). It i s caused by a h e l i c a l compound T. IEEE onMagn., MAG-20, No.5,1409 (1984).
i n t h e m a g n e t i z a t i o n of the wire. The amorphous wire i s made by UNITIKA Co., U j i ,
The magnitudeof 9' i s obtained by u s i n g t h e r e l a t - Kyoto, Japan.
ionofrotE = - a B / a t and Stokes' Theorem: [ 2 ] K. Mohri, i b i d . , MAG-20, No.?, 942 (1984).
ep' = 2 D L N, M, B s sine (H" - Ho) / 6 (2) [ 3 ] I. Ohnaka, T. Fukusako, T. Ohmichi, T. Masumoto,
A . Inoueand M . Hagiwara, P r o c .4 t hI n t . Conf.on
__
where L i s the wire length and B, s i n e i s t h e r e s u l t a n t
Rapidly Quenched Metals, 31 (1 981 , Sendai) .
[ 41 T. J a g i e l i n s k i , T . IEEE on Magn. , MAG-I 9 , No. 5,
component of t h e f l u x density perpendicular to a plane 1925 (1 983).
including the wire axis and a wire radius due t o t h e
random t w i s t i n g s t r e s s e s .
' The voltageep'hasthe same f u n c t i o n a l dependence
on fand Hm as ep. The theoreticalvaluesalmostagree
w i t h e x p e r i m e n t a l v a l u e s f o r Rc = 1 mm are obtained by
s u b s t i t u t i n g Nw = 1and s i n e = 0.1 i n t o e q u a t i o n ( 2 ) .
Figure 6 shows t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l r e s u l t s ofep'versus
t h e amount of twist, n t w , ( s o l i d l i n e ) and f o r t h e
amount of twist followed by a n a n n e a l ( d o t t e d l i n e ) .
The magnitudeofep' i s g r e a t l y changeddue t o t h e s e
treatments,e.g.about 20 timesincreased by t w i s t i n g
with ntw 2 0.1 turn/cmandabout15times by a f l a s h
annealing with 0.4 A, 2 sec: with a twist of n t w = 0.3
turn/cm. T h s i m p r o v e m e n t s a r e presumablydue t o t h e
i n c r e a s e of s i n e by alignment of magnetization.vectors
w i t ht h ei n v e r s em a g n e t o s t r i c t i v ee f f e c t .J i t t e r - l e s s