Project 3
Project 3
Project 3
S T AT E M E N T S
Definitions
According to John N. Myer “The financial statements
provide a summary of the accounts of a business enterprise,
the Balance sheet reflecting the assets and liabilities and the
income statement showing the results of operations during a
certain period.”
Owners:
Owners provide funds or capital for the operation of the
business. Financial statements provide all the necessary
information and the profitability position of the business to
ensure the owners as to whether their funds are being properly
utilized or not.
Creditors:
The financial statements reveal the position, profitability
and solvency of the business. This way it helps the creditors
Investors:
Prospective investors, who want to invest money in a firm,
would like to make an analysis of the financial statements of that
firm to know how safe the proposed investment will be.
Employees:
Employees are interested in the financial position
of a concern they serve, particularly when payment of
bonus depends upon the size of profits earned. They
would like to know whether the bonus paid to them is
correct; so they become interested in preparation of
correct profit & loss a/c.
5.Government:
Historical in nature:
Artificial view:
1. DOCUMENTATION
2. Approval
It took three week to obtain permission letter from
The bank so the major time was consumed
3. Secrecy
To maintain the secrecy of the bank. Bank provided only the
previous year balance sheet and data.
Scope of manipulations:
G. Ratio Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Expression
Classification of Ratios:
I. Liquidity ratios
Interpretation
Interpretation
The actual absolute liquid ratio is compared with the standard or
ideal absolute liquid ratio of 1:2 (The standard absolute liquid
ratio is fixed at 1:2, because for the payment of the quick
liabilities, besides the 100% cash available from the absolute
liquid assets, good amount of cash may also come from other
current assets like bills receivable, sundry debtors).
3) Quick Ratio
Interpretation
The actual quick ratio has to be compared with the standard or
ideal quick ratio of 1:1 (In the standard quick ratio of 1:1 the
quick assets are fixed at the same level as the quick liabilities,
and no cushion or margin is provided, because the quick assets
can be realized quickly without much loss).
1) Debt-Equity Ratio
Interpretation
The standard or ideal debt-equity ratio is 2:1.As such , if the
debt is less than two times the equity, the logical conclusion is
the financial structure of the concern is the sound, and so, the
stake or risk of the long-term creditors is relatively less.
Interpretation
Once can say that higher the proprietary ratios, the stronger is the
financial position of the concern, and lower the proprietary
ratios, the weaker is the financial position of the enterprise.
Generally , a ratio of 5:1 is the considered ideal.
Interpretation
The standard or ideal fixed assets to net worth ratios for an
industrial undertaking is 2\3 or 67%. That is the fixed assets
should not constitute more than 2\3 or 67% of the proprietors
funds. As such, if the fixed assets constitute more than 67% of
the proprietors’ funds are mostly sunk in the fixed assets,
constitute more than 67% of the proprietors funds the indication
is that the proprietors funds are mostly sunk in the fixed assets.
4) Solvency Ratio
Interpretation
The standard or ideal current assets to net worth ratio. Thought
there is no standard current assets to net worth ratio, one can say
that, if this ratio is high, the financial strength of the concern is
good, and if this ratio is low, the financial position of the
concern is weak.
Interpretation
The desirables level set for this ratios is 1/3 or 33 1/3. So, if the
actual ratio is very high, it would mean that the liability base of
the concern will not provide an adequate cover for long-term
Interpretation
If the fixed interest-bearing long term loans, deposits and
debentures and fixed divided-bearing preference share capital are
more than the equity shareholder funds , the company is said to
be highly geared. If the equity shareholders funds are equal to
the fixed interest-bearing loans, deposit and debentures and fixed
dividend-bearing preference share capital, the company is said to
be evenly geared.
Profitability Ratios
Interpretation
The standard or ideal current deposit to total deposits. Thought
there is no standard current assets to net worth ratio, one can say
that, if this ratio is high, the financial strength of the concern is
good, and if this ratio is low, the financial position of the
concern is weak
Interpretation
The standard or ideal savings deposits to total deposits. Thought
there is no standard current assets to net worth ratio, one can say
that, if this ratio is high, the financial strength of the concern is
good, and if this ratio is low, the financial position of the
concern is weak
Interpretation
Interpretation
The standard or ideal net profit to working funds. Thought there
is no standard current assets to net worth ratio, one can say that,
if this ratio is high, the financial strength of the concern is good,
and if this ratio is low, the financial position of the concern is
weak
Interpretation
The standard or net profit to net worth ratio. Thought there is no
standard current assets to net worth ratio, one can say that, if this
1) Liquidity Position:
With the help of ratio analysis, conclusions can be drawn
regarding the liquidity position of a firm. The liquidity position
of a firm would be satisfactory if it is able to meet its current
obligations when they become due. A firm can be said to have
the ability to meet its short-term liabilities if it has sufficient
liquid funds to pay the interest on its short-maturating debt
usually within a year as well as the principal. This ability is
reflected in the liquidity ratios of a firm. The liquidity ratios are
2) Long-term Solvency:
Ratio analysis is equally useful for assessing the long-term
financial viability of a firm. This aspect of the financial position
of a borrower is of concern to the long-term creditors, security
analysts and the present and potential owners of a business. The
long-term solvency is measured by the leverage or capital
structure and profitability ratios, which focus on earning power
and operating efficiency. Ratio analysis reveals the strengths
and weaknesses of a firm in this respect. The leverage
ratios will indicate whether a firm has reasonable proportion of
various sources of finance or whether it is heavily loaded with
debt in which case its solvency is exposed to serious strain. The
profitability ratios, on the there hand, reveal whether or not the
firm is able to offer adequate return consistent with the risk
involved.
3) Operation Efficiency:
Yet another dimension of the usefulness of the ratio
analysis, relevant from the viewpoint of management is that it
throws light on the degree of efficiency in the management and
utilization of its assets. The various activity ratios measure the
operating efficiency.
4) Overall Profitability:
The management is constantly concerned about the overall
profitability of the enterprise. They are concerned about the
ability of the firm to meet its short-term as well as long-term
obligations, to ensure a reasonable return and secure the optimum
utilization of the assets of a firm. Profitability ratios measure
the profitability of a concern and reveal the total effect of the
5) Forecasting purpose:
If the accounting ratios are calculated for a number of years, then
a trend is established. This trend helps in setting up future plans
and forecasting.
6) Comparison of performance:
Accounting ratios assist in comparing between one
department of a firm with another of the same firm in order to
evaluate the performance of various departments in a firm.
Difficulty in comparison:
Impact of inflation:
Conceptual diversity:
False results:
Definition
A ratio is defined as the “numerical or arithmetical
relationship between two figures”. It is expressed when one
Liquidity ratios
1) Current Ratio
Profitability Ratios
PLAN OF ANALYSIS
CHAPTER – I
Introduction to the study:
CHAPTER –II
Design of the study
CHAPTER III
Profile of the bank:
This chapter provides the insight about the past and present
standing of the bank and also gives us a view about the
achievements of the bank.
CHAPTER V
Parentage of BANK
According to economists the word “bank” has been derived
from the German word “BANC” which means a joint stock firm.
While others say that it has been derived from the Italian word
“BANCO” which means a “heap or mount”. As a matter of fact, at
the time of establishment of bank of Venice in 1157, the Germans
were influential and perhaps the word “BANC” or “BANCO” was
used by Italians to denote the accumulation of securities or
money with a joint stock firm, which later on with the passage of
time came to be known as “BANK”.
Bank background:
The bank has been the first among the nationalized banks to
establish a fully computerized branch and ATM facility at the
Mahalaxmi Branch at Mumbai way back in 1989. The Bank is also
a Founder Member of SWIFT in India. It pioneered the
introduction of the Health Code System in 1982, for evaluating/
rating its credit portfolio.
The Bank has 2528 branches in India spread over all states/
union territories including 93 specialized branches. These
branches are controlled through 47 Zonal Offices (HEAD OFFICE
Mumbai). There are 19 branches/ offices (including one
representative office at Jakarta, Indonesia) abroad located in 10
countries.
The Bank, as on March 2006, had 93 specialized branches
comprising
1) Ahmedabad
2) Bhuj
3) Ernakulam
4) Mumbai
5) New Delhi
Apart from this, the Bank also has specialized Branches for
Asset Recovery, Small Scale Industries, Hi-tech Agriculture
Finance, Lease Finance [Mumbai] and Treasury.
Delegation of powers:
Reorganization:
Grievance redressal:
VISION:
Organisation Chart
Board of Directors
Managing Director
Assistants General
Chief Managers
Managers
Senior Officers
Officers
Assistants
S uRbS – S t a f f
BOARD OF DIRECTO
BASIS OF COMPARISION
Liquidity Ratios
1. Current Ratio
Expression : Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Standard : 2:1
2009
Current Assets = 1,70,36,26,533
Current liabilities = 2,02,51,98,695
Current Ratio = 1,70,36,26,533 / 2,02,51,98,695
Current Ratio = 0.84
2008
Current Assets = 1,34,60,10,339
Current Liabilities = 1,61,06,81,377
Current Ratio =1,34,60,10,339/1,61,06,81,377
Current Ratio = 0.83
2007
Current Assets = 1,05,53,49,341
Current Liabilities = 1,29,30,07,891
Current Ratio =1,05,53,49,341 / 1,29,30,07,891
TABLE- 1
C u r r e n t R at i o
Current Ratio
2007 : 0.81
2008 : 0.83
2009 : 0.84
INTERPRETATION
During the year 2009 the current ratios fall at 0.84:1 when
compared to 0.83: 1 in the year 2008 & 0.81: 1 in the year 2007.
2009
Absolute Liquid Assets =8,91,52,845+12,84,59,711
Absolute Liquid Assets = 21,76,12,556
Quick Liabilities = 1,89,70,84,797+12,81,13,898
Quick Liabilities = 2,02,51,98,695
Absolute Liquid Ratio = 21,76,12,556/ 2,02,51,98,695
Absolute Liquid Ratio = 0.107
2008
Absolute Liquid Assets = 11,74,18,505+5,97,55,389
Absolute Liquid Assets = 17,71,73,894
Quick Liabilities = 1,50,01,19,812+11,05,61,565
Quick Liabilities = 1,61,06,81,377
Absolute Liquid Ratio = 17,71,73,894 / 1,61,06,81,377
2007
Absolute Liquid Assets = 7,19,68,894+10,20,86,456
Absolute Liquid Assets = 17,40,55,350
Quick Liabilities
=1,19,88,17,362+9,41,90,529
Quick Liabilities = 1,29,30,07,891
Absolute Liquid Ratio = 17,40,55,350 /
1,29,30,07,891
Absolute Liquid Ratio = 0.134
2007 : 0.134:2
2008 : 0.109:2
2009 :
0.107:2
G R AP H – 2
INTERPRETATION
The actual absolute liquid ratio is compared with standard
or ideal absolute liquid ratio of 1 : 2. That means Re.1 worth of
absolute liquid assets are sufficient for Rs.2 worth of Current
Liabilities.
2009
Net Fixed Assets = 2,13,44,522 + 28,70,284
= 2,42,14,806
Net Worth = 52,59,146 + 12,96,90,067
= 13,49,49,213
Fixed Assets to
Net Worth Ratio = 2,42,14,806 / 13,49,49,213
= 18%
2007
Net Fixed Assets = 55,30,977 + 22,47,861
= 77,78,838
Net Worth = 48,81,420 + 5,40,72,333
= 5,89,53,753
Fixed Assets to
Net Worth Ratio = 77,78,838 / 5,89,53,753
= 13%
2007 :
13%
2008 : 22%
2009 :
18%
GRAPH-3
2007
Current Assets to
Net Worth Ratio
2007 :
17.90
2008 :
12.71
2009 :
12.62
G R AP H – 4
The current assets to net worth ratio fall at 12.62 in the year 2009
as compared to 12.71 in the year 2008 & 17.90 in the year 2007
2009
Credit = 1,42,90,93,738
Deposit = 1,89,70,84,797
Credit Deposit Ratio = 1,42,90,93,738 /1,89,70,84,797* 100
= 75.33%
2008
Credit = 1,13,47,63,264
Deposit = 1,50,01,19,812
Credit Deposit Ratio = 1,13,47,63,264 /1,50,01,19,812* 100
= 75.64%
2007
Credit = 85,11,58,944
Deposit = 1,19,88,17,362
Credit Deposit Ratio =85,11,58,944 /1,19,88,17,362* 100
= 71%
2007 : 71%
2008 :
75.64%
2009 :
75.33%
G R AP H – 5
Standard : No Standard
2009
Current Deposits = 27,70,617+12,30,44,827
= 12,58,15,444
Total Deposits = 1,89,70,84,797
Current Deposit to
Total Deposits Ratio
=12,58,15,444/1,89,70,84,797*100
= 6.63%
2008
Current Deposits = 19,15,034+12,28,13,669
= 12,47,28,703
Total Deposits = 1,50,01,19,812
Current Deposit to
Total Deposits Ratio =12,47,28,703
/1,50,01,19,812 *100
=8.31%
Current Deposits to
Total Deposits Ratio
2007 : 7.81%
2008 : 8.31%
2009 : 6.63%
G R AP H – 6
Standard : No Standard
2009
Savings Deposits = 38,19,36,910
Total Deposits = 1,89,70,84,797
Savings Deposits to
Total Deposit Ratio = 38,19,36,910 /1,89,70,84,797 * 100
= 20.13%
2008
Savings Deposits = 33,43,87,684
Total Deposits = 1,50,01,19,812
Savings Deposits to
Total Deposit Ratio = 33,43,87,684/1,50,01,19,812 *100
= 22.30%
2007
Savings Deposits = 29,25,46,784
TABLE-7
Savings Deposits Total Deposit Ratio
Savings Deposits to
Total Deposit Ratio
2007 : 24.40%
2008 : 22.30%
2009 : 20.13%
G R AP H – 7
2009
Term Deposits = 1,38,93,32,443
Total Deposits = 1,89,70,84,797
Term Deposits to
Total Deposit Ratio = 1,38,93,32,443 /1,89,70,84,797 * 100
= 73.23%
2008
Term Deposits = 1,04,10,03,425
Total Deposits = 1,50,01,19,812
Savings Deposits to
Total Deposit Ratio = 1,04,10,03,425 /1,50,01,19,812 * 100
= 69.40%
2007
Term Deposits = 81,26,11,930
Total Deposits = 1,19,88,17,362
Term Deposits to
Total Deposit Ratio = 81,26,11,930/ 1,19,88,17,362* 100
= 67.78%
2007 : 67.78%
2008 : 69.40%
2009: 73.23%
G R AP H – 8
I n t er e s t I n c o m e t o
Working Funds Ratio
2007 :
25.17%
2008 :
29.55%
2009 :
31.07%
INTERPRETATION
2009
Non -Interest Income = 3,05,18,627
Working Funds = 52,60,71,791
Non - Interest Income to
Working Funds Ratio = 3,05,18,627 /52,60,71,791 * 100
= 5.80%
2008
Non -Interest Income = 2,11,69,261
Working Funds = 41,80,28,767
Non - Interest Income to
Working Funds Ratio = 2,11,69,261/ 41,80,28,767* 100
= 5.06%
2007
Non - Interest Income = 1,56,29,533
Working Funds = 35,49,27,618
Non - Interest Income to
Working Funds Ratio = 1,56,29,533 /35,49,27,618 *100
= 4.40%
2007 : 4.40%
2008 : 5.06%
2009 : 5.80%
GRAPH – 10
Standard : No Standard
2008
Total Income = 14,47,21,473
Working Funds = 41,80,28,767
Total Income to
Working Funds
Ratio = 14,47,21,473 /41,80,28,767 *100
= 34.61%
2007
Total Income = 10,49,92,365
Working Funds = 35,49,27,618
Total Income to
Working Funds Ratio = 10,49,92,365/35,49,27,618 * 100
= 29.58%
2007 : 29.58%
2008 : 34.61%
2009 : 36.87%
GRAPH – 11
8 ) N o n - I n t e r e s t I n c o m e t o T o t a l I n c o m e R at i o
Expression : Non -Interest Income X 100
2008
Non -Interest Income = 2,11,69,261
Total Income = 14,47,21,473
Non - Interest Income to
Total Income Ratio =2,11,69,261 /14,47,21,473 * 100
= 14.62%
2007
Non -Interest Income = 1,56,29,533
Total Income = 10,49,92,365
Non - Interest Income to
Total Income Ratio = 1,56,29,533/ 10,49,92,365* 100
= 14.88%
2007 :
14.88%
2008 :
14.62%
2009 :
15.73%
GRAPH – 12
2009
Operating Expenses = 3,09,39,633
Working Funds = 52,60,71,791
Operating Expenses to
Working Funds Ratio = 3,09,39,633/52,60,71,791 *100
= 5.88%
2008
Operating Expenses = 2,64,49,874
Working Funds = 41,80,28,767
Operating Expenses to
Working Funds Ratio =2,64,49,874 /41,80,28,767 *100
= 6.32%
2007
Operating Expenses = 2,60,84,303
Working Funds = 35,49,27,618
Operating Expenses to
Working Funds Ratio =2,60,84,303 /35,49,27,618 * 100
= 7.34%
2007 : 7.34%
2008 : 6.32%
2009 : 5.88%
INTERPRETATION
2009
Operating Profit = 1,38,00,843
Working Funds = 52,60,71,791
Operating Profit to
Working Funds Ratio =1,38,00,843 /52,60,71,791 * 100
= 2.62%
2008
Operating Profit =67,91,311
Working Funds = 41,80,28,767
Operating Profit to
Working Funds Ratio =67,91,311 /41,80,28,767 * 100
= 1.62%
2007
Operating Profit =46,13,730
Operating Profit to
Working Funds Ratio
2007 : 1.30%
2008 : 1.62%
2009 : 2.62%
GRAPH –14
2009
Net Profit = 3,00,73,463
Working Funds = 52,60,71,791
Net Profit to
Working Funds Ratio = 3,00,73,463 /52,60,71,791 * 100
= 5.71%
2008
Net Profit = 2,00,94,026
Working Funds = 41,80,28,767
Net Profit to
Working Funds Ratio = 2,00,94,026 / 41,80,28,767* 100
= 4.80%
2007
Net Profit = 1,12,31,690
Working Funds = 35,49,27,618
Net Profit to
Working Funds Ratio = 1,12,31,690 /35,49,27,618 * 100
= 3.16%
2007 :
3.16%
2008 :
4.80%
2009 :
5.71%
GRAPH – 15
Higher the Net Profit to Working Funds Ratio the better will
be the banks financial position.
SUGGESTIONS
the government has been made in the year 2009 and 2008 so that it
of 5 years. The rapid change of debt equity ratio was in the year
have been increasing it was just 54.07Crores in the year 2007 and
years.
should be fluctuating
11) Net profit ratio of the bank is 1.123 in the year 2007
and should up to 3.007 in the year 2009. Therefore the net profit
5.88%
the year 2007 and it was 30.9 crores in the year 2009.The
The analysis is done for the current year 2009. The bank’s
liquidity position, capital structure and profitability is good.
There has been an improvement in all the sectors.
M . Y . K HA N & P . K . J A I N MANAGEMENT
ACCOUNTING
Website
www.bankofindia.com