GC Women University Sialkot: Assignment #
GC Women University Sialkot: Assignment #
GC Women University Sialkot: Assignment #
ASSIGNMENT # 1
In this case study, You have to assume that you have been offered a job a
company named “ Jekyll and Hyde Corporations” and the job is in your
chosen career path, and the job would be started after the 2 weeks of your
graduation. The company is well positioned and they are appealing to you
to make good use of your training, and you have to meet your superior who
guide you about your position in the company and about the reputation of
the company. The company promotes it’s self as a fair-trade and
sustainable organization. A human resource manager named Gabriel
Utterson called you to discuss about the job description, but one thing was
not mentioned which is your starting salary. The company really wants to
hire you, Gabriel gives you time and wanted you to think about this and call
you back tomorrow. So you have to take the decision about, what to do with
the offer of the Jekyll corporation’s.
Question /Answer
A). The starting salary I would give Gabriel would be the amount I feel I
am worth as an employee. The salary that represents the minimum offer I would
be willing to accept would be a predetermined amount I would need to meet my
needs determined by my budget, such as bills etcetera. The two numbers are
different to allow flexibility for situations such as this. The job is exactly what is
wanted yet the company might not have the start-up capital to pay as much as I
would like up front. As long as there was room for growth within the company
and increase potential such as future pay raises after a probation period that
could be made in writing, the initial sacrifice of income might be worth it.Giving
Gabriel a different number than the “internal” number would not violate the
Jekyll Corporation’s transparent culture any more than them not stating the limit
up front that they can afford to offer themselves. If both parties agree upon a
certain salary, then it is obviously a number that both parties feel comfortable
settling for.
Q) Assume you’ve received another offer, this one from Hyde
Associates. Like the Jekyll job, this position is on your chosen
career path and in the consumer products industry. Assume,
however, that you’ve read in the news that “Hyde Associates has
been criticized for unsustainable manufacturing practices that
may be harmful to the environment. It has further been
criticized for unfair trade practices and for employing underage
children. Would that change whether you’d be willing to take the
job? Why or why not?
A) Upon receiving another offer from Hyde I would start by weighing the pros and
cons of both positions at the different companies. However, upon discovering the
unethical practices that the Hyde Company participates in I feel it wouldn’t be a
hard decision to make. At this point after the research I would no longer consider
them as a viable option for employment. It does not mention a salary offer by the
Hyde Associates within the question but I assume that since it is an ethical
dilemma situation they would be offering more. I can see how some people at
this point would at least question whether they should take this offer, however, I
value my sleep at night. I could not in good conscious take a job at a place which
held such opposite values as my own. Granted, no place is perfect and you have
to pick and choose your battles or you would probably be better off starting your
own company since you would not agree with your employer always. However, in
this situation it seems that their principles and values are at odds with your own,
so it is best not to get in bed with the enemy from the beginning
Q) These scenarios are based on studies of corporate social
responsibility (CSR) practices that show consumers generally
charge a kind of rent to companies that do not practice CSR. In
other words, they generally expect a substantial discount in
order to buy a product from Hyde rather than from Jekyll. For
example, if Jekyll and Hyde sold coffee, 35 people would pay a
premium of $1.40 to buy coffee from Jekyll and demand a
discount of $2.40 to buy Hyde coffee. Do you think this
preference translates into job choice decisions? Why or why not?
A) Yes, I think that people would pick the job that provided more even though it
meant giving up some of their values or lowering their standards. There are also
people who would not give up what they believe in to make a buck or couple of
bucks. It depends on the morals that people are brought up with that help to
differentiate from which company they would choose to benefit from.I would not
be able to work for someone who lied to their customers, I think that if people
have to lie then there must be a problem. I do not like covering up facts that may
or may not affect other people who base their decisions on these facts. All
information should be available regardless of how it would affect their business,
that’s good customer service