17 Omerhodzic
17 Omerhodzic
17 Omerhodzic
doi: 10.20471/acc.2020.59.02.17
MYXOPAPILLARY EPENDYMOMA
OF THE SPINAL CORD IN ADULTS:
A REPORT OF PERSONAL SERIES
AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Ibrahim Omerhodžić1, Mirza Pojskić2,3, Krešimir Rotim3-5, Bruno Splavski3-6,
Lukas Rasulić7 and Kenan I. Arnautovic8,9
1
Department of Neurosurgery, Sarajevo University Clinical Center, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina;
2
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany;
3
Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Medicine, Osijek, Croatia;
4
University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia;
5
Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia;
6
Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, School of Dental Medicine and Health, Osijek, Croatia;
7
Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia;
8
Semmes Murphey Neurologic & Spine Institute, Memphis, TN, United States;
9
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States
SUMMARY – Myxopapillary ependymomas (MPE) of the spinal cord are slow-growing benign
tumors most frequently found in adults between 30 and 50 years of age. They arise from the ependyma
of the filum terminale and are located in the area of the medullary conus and cauda. The recom-
mended treatment option is gross total resection, while patients undergoing subtotal resection usually
require radiotherapy. Complete resection without capsular violation can be curative and is often ac-
complished by simple resection of the filum above and below the tumor mass. Nevertheless, dissemi-
nation and distant treatment failure may occur in approximately 30% of the cases. In this paper, we
propose an original MPE classification, which is based upon our personal series report concerned with
tumor location and its correlation with the extent of resection. We also provide literature review, dis-
cussing surgical technique, tumor recurrence rate and dissemination, and adjuvant treatment. In con-
clusion, our findings suggest that MPE management based on the proposed 5-type tumor classifica-
tion is favorable when total surgical resection is performed in carefully selected patients. Yet, further
studies on a much broader model is obligatory to confirm this.
Key words: Myxopapillary ependymoma; Gross total resection; Surgical technique; Tumor classification
Fig. 2. Preoperative sagittal T2-weighted spinal MRI revealing spinal cord cystic tumor with
intratumoral hemorrhage at L1-L3 level (arrow), and subdural hematoma at S1 level (asterisk) (a).
Axial T2-weighted MRI demonstrating the tumor cyst of the vertebral canal ventral part at L1 level
(arrow) (b) and subdural hematoma of the dorsal part of the canal at S1 level (asterisk) (c).
Postoperative sagittal T2-weighted MRI confirming complete tumor resection, hematoma
evacuation, and spinal T12-L3 stabilization (d,e).
along the neural axis to distant cranial and spinal loca- partial (subtotal) resection typically require adjuvant
tions, or to local spots after surgery1,9. Therefore, gross high-dose radiotherapy12,13. Complete tumor removal
total tumor resection, accompanied by intraoperative without iatrogenic capsular damage followed by sim-
neuromonitoring, remains the best surgical manage- ple resection of the filum above and below the tumor
ment option available9-11, while patients undergoing mass is always beneficial, but it may be difficult to ac-
complish. When rupture of the tumor capsule occurs medullary conus with cystic compartment and signs of
during surgery, brain and whole spine adjuvant radio- syringomyelia in the upper part of the cord). Postop-
therapy is suggested to prevent local recurrence and erative sagittal T2-weighted MRI of the spine revealed
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dissemination14. Preserva- complete tumor resection with syringomyelia resolu-
tion of sacrococcygeal nerve roots is vital to diminish tion (Fig. 1c) resulting in full neurological recovery.
the incidence of postoperative urinary dysfunction15.
Nevertheless, neural axis dissemination, distant treat- Case 2
ment failure, and tumor relapse may occur in one-third A 43-year-old female presented with acute urinary
of patients13. retention and initial paraparesis. A spinal cord cystic
Herein, we present a 7-case personal series report tumor with intratumoral hemorrhage at L1-L3 level
and propose an original anatomical and surgical MPE (arrow), and subdural hematoma at S1 level (asterisk)
classification grounded on tumor location and its cor- were visualized on sagittal T2-weighted MRI of the
relation with the extent of resection16. We also provide lumbar spine (Fig. 2a). Axial T2-weighted MRI dem-
a literature review, discussing surgical technique, tu- onstrated tumor cyst of the vertebral canal ventral part
mor recurrence rate and dissemination, and adjuvant at L1 level (arrow) (Fig. 2b), and subdural hematoma
treatment. of the dorsal part of the canal at S1 level (asterisk)
(Fig. 2c). The tumor was also classified as type IV B
Case Series Report MPE (involving the entire medullary conus with cys-
tic compartment hemorrhage). Complete tumor resec-
Case 1 tion, hematoma evacuation, and spinal T12-L3 stabili-
A 45-year-old female was admitted to the hospital zation with transpedicular screws and rods were ac-
due to minor lower-limb motor weakness and urinary complished successfully, which was confirmed by post-
retention. A cystic contrast-enhancing tumor at L1-2 operative sagittal T2-weighted MRI (Fig. 2d,e) and
level (arrow) with syringomyelia at T10-12 level was resulted in full patient recovery.
identified on preoperative sagittal post-contrast T1-
Case 3
weighted spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
(Fig. 1a). The cyst and syringomyelia (arrow) were well A 72-year-old female complained of low back and
visualized on sagittal T2-weighted MRI (Fig. 1b). Ac- bilateral leg pain without any neurological deficit. Pre-
cording to our classification, the tumor was deter- operative sagittal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted spi-
mined to be type IV B MPE (involving the entire nal MRI demonstrated an intradural-extramedullary
Fig. 4. Preoperative sagittal post-contrast T1-weighted MRI of the lumbar spine showing
an enhancing solid tumor at L3 level with engrossment of filum terminale and cauda equina
(a), also shown on post-contrast axial T1-weighted (b) and sagittal T2-weighted MRI (c)
(arrows). Postoperative post-contrast T1-weighted sagittal (d), axial (e) and sagittal
T2-weighted MRI (f ) confirming total tumor resection.
tumor mass at L4 level (Fig. 3a). The tumor, which was 4c) MRI scans (arrows). The tumor was classified as
confined to the filum terminale and adherent to the type I B MPE (extramedullary conus with lumbar
nerve roots, was also visible on preoperative T2- nerve root and filum involvement). Postoperative post-
weighted sagittal (arrow) (Fig. 3b) and axial (arrow) contrast T1-weighted sagittal (Fig. 4d), axial (Fig. 4e),
(Fig. 3c) MRI scans. The tumor was classified as type I as well as sagittal T2-weighted MRI (Fig. 4f ) demon-
B MPE (extramedullary conus with lumbar nerve root strated total tumor resection resulting in complete
and filum involvement). Postoperative sagittal T2- neurological recovery.
weighted MRI demonstrated gross total tumor resec-
tion (Fig. 3d). The patient reported no low back and Case 5
leg pain following surgery. A 47-year-old female presented with paraparesis,
L2 level sensory loss, and bowel incontinence. Preop-
Case 4
erative post-contrast sagittal T2-weighted (Fig. 5a)
A 56-year-old female presented with low back and T1-weighted (Fig. 5b) lumbar spine MRI demon-
pain, lower limb numbness, and voiding difficulties. strated a solid tumor mass at L3 level (arrows). The
Preoperative sagittal post-contrast T1-weighted MRI tumor was classified as type I B MPE (extramedullary
of the lumbar spine showed an enhancing solid tumor conus with lumbar nerve root and filum involvement).
at L3 level affecting filum terminale and cauda equina Postoperative sagittal T2-weighted MRI confirmed
(Fig. 4a), which was also shown on post-contrast axial complete tumor resection (Fig. 5c). The patient re-
T1-weighted (Fig. 4b) and sagittal T2-weighted (Fig. mained neurologically intact following surgery.
Fig. 6. Preoperative post-contrast sagittal T2-weigted (a) and T1-weighted (b) lumbar MRI
revealing a large cystic tumor at L2 level with hydromyelia and involvement of medullary conus.
Postoperative sagittal T2-weighted MRI confirming complete tumor resection with cyst drainage
and hydromyelia resolution (c).
Fig. 7. Preoperative post-contrast sagittal T2-weighted MRI of the lumbar spine demonstrating a large cystic tumor at
L1-L2 level with involvement of medullary conus and filum terminale (asterisk) (a). Sagittal T1-weighted MRI
revealing two additional lesions at L3 level, and S1 segment as the site of primary seeding (arrows) (b). Axial post-
contrast T1-weighted MRI depicting separate tumors at L1 (c) and L3 levels (d) (arrows). Postoperative sagittal T2-
weighted (e) and post-contrast T1-weighted MRI (f ) confirming total resection of all the three tumors.
outside the lumbar cord, but still within the vertebral geon and other medical staff7,23. The same happened
canal along the thoracic and/or cervical spine repre- with the patients from this series where no surgical
sent type V A MPE, whereas those located outside the morbidity and no tumor relapse or dissemination was
vertebral canal epitomize type V B MPEs that may be observed. Accordingly, Klekamp et al. report that gross
situated at intracranial or sacrococcygeal regions. total tumor resection was achieved in 77.7% of their
Reviewing the literature, we found that the mean patients7, while several studies suggest that it must be
patient age at the time of tumor symptomatic occur- combined with high-dose radiotherapy in order to im-
rence was 36.44 years, and that medullary conus was prove the outcome24-26, and to avoid recurrence, as well
involved in 28.4% of cases17, which was less consistent as primary and secondary seeding, which remains un-
with our results where the mean patient age was 47.28 der-recognized in adults1,27. Although tumor benign
years and the entire medullary conus was involved in histologic features are commonly preserved in case of
four out of seven (57.1%) patients. dissemination28, rostral neuro-axial spread mostly af-
Younger age, preoperative functional capacity, less- fects the thoracic and cervical spine29,30. Then, addi-
er initial neurological deficit, tumor location, size and tional resection or irradiation would be endorsed if
the extent of resection, as well as adjuvant radiotherapy metastases become symptomatic30. There are single
were identified as significant prognostic factors influ- case reports describing the benefits of second- and
encing better outcome8,13,18,19. All the patients from our third-line chemotherapy concomitant with radiother-
series had minor or lesser degree neurological deficit apy after multiple surgeries of recurrent MPE with
on admission, and total surgical tumor resection was disseminated metastases31,32. However, this was not the
possible in all of them. case in patients from our series, since all of them re-
Long-term outcome is also correlated to the extent covered well after total tumor resection. Therefore, the
of tumor resection, as well as to the integrity of the need for repeat surgery or adjuvant therapy was not
tumor capsule7,20, since larger tumors may perforate established and no tumor relapse or dissemination was
the capsule14, leading to CSF seeding and dissemina- recorded. Nonetheless, one should still remember the
tion21. Hence, an association between capsular damage possibility of tumor relapse, primary seeding, and drop
and tumor relapse was found22. Still, surgical morbidity metastases; one should also consider the entire cranio-
is generally low and postoperative clinical improve- spinal neuroimaging as part of both the preoperative
ment is pretty good, while recurrence rate remains work-up and postoperative follow-up1. Therefore,
scarce when treatment recommendations and proto- long-term or lifelong MRI surveillance should be ad-
cols are strictly followed by an experienced neurosur- vised1,16, which is also part of our patient protocol.
In conclusion, having in mind the small number of surgery. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011;27(9):1445-52, http://dx.doi.
patients in this personal case series, as well as its retro- org/10.1007/s00381-011-1471-4.
spective design, our findings suggest that MPE man- 11. Tobin MK, Geraghty JR, Engelhard HH, et al. Intramedullary
spinal cord tumors: a review of current and future treatment
agement based on the proposed 5-type tumor classifi-
strategies. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39(2):E14, http://dx.doi.
cation is favorable when total surgical resection is per- org/10.3171/2015.5.FOCUS15158.
formed in carefully selected patients, which is well-
12. Fassett DR, Pingree J, Kestle JR. The high incidence of tumor
supported by the literature data. Yet, additional studies dissemination in myxopapillary ependymoma in pediatric pa-
on a much broader model are obligatory to confirm tients. Report of five cases and review of the literature. J Neu-
these results. rosurg. 2005;102(1 Suppl):59-64, http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/
ped.2005.102.1.0059.
Acknowledgment 13. Weber DC, Wang Y, Miller R, et al. Long-term outcome of
patients with spinal myxopapillary ependymoma: treatment re-
We thank Mr. Andrew Gienapp for editing this sults from the MD Anderson Cancer Center and institutions
manuscript. from the Rare Cancer Network. Neuro Oncol. 2015;17(4):588-
95, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nou293.
14. Nakamura M, Ishii K, Watanabe K, et al. Long-term surgical
References outcomes for myxopapillary ependymomas of the cauda equi-
1. Khan NR, VanLandingham M, O’Brien T, et al. Primary Seed- na. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(21):E756-60, http://dx.doi.
ing of Myxopapillary Ependymoma: Different Disease in org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b34d16.
Adult Population? Case Report and Review of Literature. 15. McCormick PC. Microsurgical enbloc resection of myxo
World Neurosurg. 2017;99:812.e21-.e26. http://dx.doi.org/ papillary cauda equina ependymoma. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;
10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.022. 37 Suppl 2:Video 7, http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2014.V3.FO-
2. Celli P, Cervoni L, Cantore G. Ependymoma of the filum ter- CUS14272.
minale: treatment and prognostic factors in a series of 28 cases. 16. Omerhodzic I, Pojskic M, Arnautovic K. Myxopapillary Epen-
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1993;124(2-4):99-103, http://dx.doi. dymomas. In: Arnautovic K, Ziya G, editors. Spinal Cord Tu-
org/10.1007/BF01401130 mors: Springer Verlag; 2019. p. 273-300.
3. Schiffer D, Chiò A, Giordana MT, et al. Histologic prognostic 17. Pesce A, Palmieri M, Armocida D, et al. Spinal Myxopapillary
factors in ependymoma. Childs Nerv Syst. 1991;7(4):177-82, Ependymoma: The Sapienza University Experience and Com-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00249392 prehensive Literature Review Concerning the Clinical Course
4. Sonneland PR, Scheithauer BW, Onofrio BM. Myxopapillary of 1602 Patients. World Neurosurg. 2019;129:245-53, http://
ependymoma. A clinicopathologic and immunocytochemical dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.206.
study of 77 cases. Cancer. 1985;56(4):883-93, http://dx.doi. 18. Bates JE, Choi G, Milano MT. Myxopapillary ependymoma:
org/10.1002/1097-0142(19850815)56:4<883::aid-cncr282056 a SEER analysis of epidemiology and outcomes. J Neuroon-
0431>3.0.co;2-6 col. 2016;129(2):251-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-
5. Banan R, Hartmann C. The new WHO 2016 classification of 016-2167-0.
brain tumors-what neurosurgeons need to know. Acta Neuro- 19. Chang UK, Choe WJ, Chung SK, et al. Surgical outcome and
chir (Wien). 2017;159(3):403-18, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ prognostic factors of spinal intramedullary ependymomas in
s00701-016-3062-3. adults. J Neurooncol. 2002;57(2):133-9, http://dx.doi.org/
6. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World 10.1023/a:1015789009058
Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central 20. Bagley CA, Wilson S, Kothbauer KF, et al. Long term out-
Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131 comes following surgical resection of myxopapillary ependy-
(6):803-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1. momas. Neurosurg Rev. 2009;32(3):321-34; discussion 34,
7. Klekamp J. Spinal ependymomas. Part 2: Ependymomas of the http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10143-009-0190-8.
filum terminale. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39(2):E7, http:// 21. Rezai AR, Woo HH, Lee M, et al. Disseminated ependymo-
dx.doi.org/10.3171/2015.5.FOCUS15151. mas of the central nervous system. J Neurosurg. 1996;85(4):618-
8. Klekamp J, Samii M. Surgery of Spinal Tumors. New York: 24, http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.85.4.0618.
Springer; 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44715-3 22. Abdulaziz M, Mallory GW, Bydon M, et al. Outcomes follow-
9. Liu T, Yang C, Deng X, et al. Clinical characteristics and surgical ing myxopapillary ependymoma resection: the importance of
outcomes of spinal myxopapillary ependymomas. Neurosurg capsule integrity. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39(2):E8, http://
Rev. 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01150-z. dx.doi.org/10.3171/2015.5.FOCUS15164.
10. Hoving EW, Haitsma E, Oude Ophuis CM, et al. The value of 23. Pojskić M, Arnautović KI. Microsurgical Resection of Low-
intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in tethered cord Grade Spinal Cord Astrocytoma: 2-Dimensional Operative
Video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2019;17(3):E107-E8, 28. Plans G, Brell M, Cabiol J, et al. Intracranial retrograde dis-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ons/opy386. semination in filum terminale myxopapillary ependymomas.
24. Chao ST, Kobayashi T, Benzel E, et al. The role of adjuvant Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006;148(3):343-6; discussion 6,
radiation therapy in the treatment of spinal myxopapillary ep- http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-005-0693-1.
endymomas. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(1):59-64, http:// 29. Andoh H, Kawaguchi Y, Seki S, et al. Multi-focal Myxopapil-
dx.doi.org/10.3171/2010.9.SPINE09920. lary Ependymoma in the Lumbar and Sacral Regions Requir-
25. Lee SH, Chung CK, Kim CH, et al. Long-term outcomes of ing Cranio-spinal Radiation Therapy: A Case Report. Asian
surgical resection with or without adjuvant radiation therapy Spine J. 2011;5(1):68-72, http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2011.
for treatment of spinal ependymoma: a retrospective multi- 5.1.68.
center study by the Korea Spinal Oncology Research Group. 30. Kraetzig T, McLaughlin L, Bilsky MH, et al. Metastases of spi-
Neuro Oncol. 2013;15(7):921-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ nal myxopapillary ependymoma: unique characteristics and
neuonc/not038. clinical management. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;28(2):201-8,
26. Pica A, Miller R, Villà S, et al. The results of surgery, with or http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2017.5.SPINE161164.
without radiotherapy, for primary spinal myxopapillary epen- 31. Fegerl G, Marosi C. Stabilization of metastatic myxopapillary
dymoma: a retrospective study from the rare cancer network. ependymoma with sorafenib. Rare Tumors. 2012;4(3):e42,
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74(4):1114-20, http:// http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/rt.2012.e42.
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.09.034. 32. Fujiwara Y, Manabe H, Izumi B, et al. Remarkable efficacy of
27. De Falco R, Scarano E, Di Celmo D, et al. Concomitant local- temozolomide for relapsed spinal myxopapillary ependymoma
ization of a myxopapillary ependymoma at the middle thoracic with multiple recurrence and cerebrospinal dissemination: a
part of the spinal cord and at the distal part of the filum termi- case report and literature review. Eur Spine J. 2017, http://dx.
nale. Case report. J Neurosurg Sci. 2008;52(3):87-91. doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5413-z.
Sažetak
Miksopapilarni ependimomi (MPE) kralježnične moždine sporo su rastući, dobroćudni tumori najčešće zastupljeni u
odraslih u dobi između 30 i 50 godina života. Nastaju iz ependima filuma terminale, a pretežito su smješteni u području
medularnoga konusa i kaude. Kirurško uklanjanje tumora u cijelosti preporučena je metoda liječenja, dok u bolesnika u kojih
to nije moguće učiniti u obzir dolazi subtotalna resekcija nakon koje je potrebno zračenje. Potpuno uklanjanje tumora uz
očuvanje cjelovitosti tumorske kapsule postiže se jednostavnom resekcijom filuma terminale iznad i ispod tumorske mase, što
može dovesti do izlječenja. Unatoč tomu, tumorska diseminacija uzduž neuralne osi može se javiti u oko 30% slučajeva. U
ovom radu predlažemo originalnu klasifikaciju MPE koja prosuđuje smještaj tumora i obujam tumorske resekcije, a temelje-
na je na osobnoj seriji operiranih bolesnika. Također raspravljamo o kirurškoj tehnici, o mogućnostima recidiva i širenja
ovakvih tumora, kao i o oblicima pomoćnog liječenja, koristeći se pregledom literature. Zaključujemo kako naši rezultati
zagovaraju kirurško liječenje temeljeno na predloženoj originalnoj tumorskoj klasifikaciji, koje može biti uspješno u pažljivo
odabranih bolesnika u kojih je tumor uklonjen u cijelosti. Naknadna istraživanja na znatno većem uzorku potrebna su za
potvrdu naših rezultata.
Ključne riječi: Miksopapilarni ependimom; Potpuna resekcija tumora; Kirurška tehnika; Klasifikacija tumora