Synthesis of 2,5-Dimethoxybenzaldehyde - [www.rhodium.ws] https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/chemistry/25-dimethoxy...

[www.rhodium.ws] [] [Chemistry Archive]

 
 

SYNTHESIS OF 2,5-DIMETHOXYBENZALDEHYDE
HTML by Rhodium

2-HYDROXY-5-METHOXYBENZALDEHYDE BY
THE FORMYLATION OF 4-METHOXYPHENOL

Formylation of 4-Methoxyphenol (4-hydroxyanisole, hydroquinone monomethyl ether) yields 2-Hydroxy-

5-Methoxybenzaldehyde (5-Methoxysalicylaldehyde). The most promising procedures include Reimer-Tiemann
formylation (CHCl 3/KOH) and Mg-mediated phenol ortho-formylation with paraformaldehyde. A few variations on
this theme is presented below.

REIMER-TIEMANN FORMYLATION OF 4-METHOXYPHENOL5

It is known that 2-hydroxy-5-methoxybenzaldehyde is formed by reacting hydroquinone monomethyl ether with

chloroform in the presence of sodium hydroxide6. However, in this process, it is necessary to purify the reaction
mixture after completion of the reaction by steam distillation and treatment with sodium bisulphite. The end product
is obtained in a low yield. By using a relatively large amount of sodium hydroxide, the reaction proceeds at a high
rate and the end product precipitates from the reaction mixture in the form of a sodium salt so that the end product
can be purified by filtration and washing, and the end product is obtained in a purity of 98.5% (GC) rendering steam
distillation and treatment with bisulphite unnecessary.

From a theoretical point of view, it would appear that chloroform could be used in an equimolar amount to the
starting phenol, but this lowers the yield; accordingly, it is preferable to use 1.5-2 molar equivalents of chloroform;
even larger amounts does not increase the yield further. A too high concentration of sodium hydroxide in the
reaction mixture causes decomposition of the end product, while a too low concentration results in too low a rate of
formylation and causes dissolution of the sodium salt of 2-hydroxy-5-methoxybenzaldehyde in the aqueous reaction
medium, making workup difficult. Thus, in order to obtain a purified end product in 48-53% yield, it's necessary to
use 300-450 g NaOH dissolved in 480-720 mL water per 100 g of hydroquinone monomethyl ether. It is
advantageous to add the hydroquinone monomethyl ether as a solution in a portion of the aqueous sodium
hydroxide solution and then add the remainder of the solution dropwise.

If KOH or LiOH are used in place of NaOH in the process, the end product is obtained in a low yield of at the most
14% in the case of KOH, and with LiOH substantially no product is obtained. The duration of the reaction is not
critical, and the reaction is merely carried out at 50-60°C (above this range polymeric tars will form as byproducts,
lowering the yield) until reaction completion is obtained. Usually about 1 hour is sufficient.

EXPERIMENTAL5

200g of hydroquinone monomethyl ether were dissolved in a solution of 190 g of sodium hydroxide in 550
ml of water and the resulting solution was heated to 50°C on a water bath. To the solution maintained at
50-60°C, there were added dropwise 420 g of chloroform and a solution of 560 g of sodium hydroxide in
500 ml of water from two separate dropping funnels and, thereafter, the reaction mixture was heated for
1 hour at a temperature of 50-60°C and atmospheric pressure. After cooling, the precipitated sodium salt
of 2-hydroxy-5-methoxybenzaldehyde was recovered by filtration and washed with 100 ml of ethanol.The
sodium salt thus obtained was dissolved in 800 ml of water, slightly acidified with dilute sulphuric acid
(1200 mL of 3N dilute sulphuric acid were added at room temperature and atmospheric pressure) and
then extracted with 200 ml of toluene. The extract was dried with calcium chloride, distilled to eliminate
toluene and then distilled under reduced pressure to obtain 132 g of 2-hydroxy-5 methoxybenzaldehyde
having a boiling point of 110°C/5mmHg.

FORMYLATION WITH PARAFORMALDEHYDE/MAGNESIUM METHOXIDE

Written by DTT, Russian Translation by Dioulasso

This formylation method can be a superior alternative to the much discussed Reimer-Tiemann formylation
(a selective ortho-formylation of phenols).

1 de 7 24/03/2018 17:18
Synthesis of 2,5-Dimethoxybenzaldehyde - [www.rhodium.ws] https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/chemistry/25-dimethoxy...

EXPERIMENTAL

A 2000 mL RBF equipped with a reflux conenser, a mechanical stirrer, and an addition funnel is charged
with 32g of magnesium followed by 200ml dry Methanol. It is possible to ad more MeOH so Mg dissolves
faster. The reaction is vigorus. Sometimes the flask has to be cooled to prevent the condenser from
spitting around. When the mixture is beginnig to get thick, 250g of 4-methoxyphenol in 300-500ml of hot
toluene is added in a slow stream from the addition funnel. The mixture is heated up with good stirring.
(Watch out - the precipitated phenolate can stick to the bottom).

When all the magnesium has dissolved, the MeOH is evaporated (it is also possible not to evaporate allI).
A suspension of 180g of ParaformaldehydeII in Toulene is added in small portions every 10 minutes
(exotermic!), with good stirring of the thick mixture. This takes about an hour. The mixture turns yellow
and gets less thick. The mixture is than stirred for another 30 min and acidified with dilute Sulfuric AcidIII.
The toluene layer is separated and the toluene is driven off. The rest is 2-Hydroxy-5-Methoxy-
Benzaldehyde.

The thus obtained product is not contaminated with 4-methoxyphenol, but containes the dimer as an
inpurity. It may be cleaned via the bisulphite adduct or it can be distilled under reduced pressure. Yield is
around 80%. The aldehyde may stain the skin yellow.

N OT E S:

A. IMHO it is not necesseary…Once I have tried not to evaporate all of it and all seemed to work fine.
B. Dry paraformaldehyde was used.
C. In the patent the acidified mixture is stirred for 5h. I'm not sure about that half an hour figure - just act by the
situation. You can see the decomposition of phenolate visually as it dissolves in toluene. One has to scratch it
diligently off the flask's wall, though.

Some final notes by Dioulasso:

It might be necesseary to efficently stir the acidified mixture in order to achive full conversion of the phenolate.
Swim experienced a lot of tar like residue after steam distilling his Reimer-Tiemann product. Is it possible that
unconverted phenolate was extracted from the not fully acidified reaction mixture, and partially that was the residue
left behind? This would explain his low yields (less than 50%)...
For smaller batches, it might be advantageous to initiate the Mg(MeO) 2 formation with small crystals of Iodine.

PREPARATION OF MAGNESIUM METHOXIDE

Below follows some a rticles describing the practical preparation of magnesium methoxide from Mg and MeOH.
The trick to get it to start working is no surprise: A crystal of elemental iodine as catalyst - and heat (60°C).

J. Med. Chem., 36(6), 758-764 (1993)

[The] magnesium methoxide was generated by refluxing a solution of magnesium (1 g) in 20 mL of MeOH
containing 10 mg of iodine.

Tet. Lett., 37(29), 5159-5160 (1996)

In the presence of iodine and hexane, alcohols readily react with magnesium to produce corresponding magnesium
alkoxides* By the simplified method used in this paper, the preparation of magnesium alkoxides was carried out in
the absence of hexane or any other saturated hydrocarbons.

Magnesium alkoxides are prepared by heating 2.43 (100 mmol) of magnesium powder, (2 mmol) of iodine, 0.2 mol
of alcohol at 60°C until the iodine color disappeared. The rest of the alcohol (MeOH 1.4 mol; EtOH 0.7-1.1 mol;
n-PrOH/n-BuOH 0.4-0.6 mol) was then added and the mixture was refluxed until all magnesium powder was
digested. The resulting magnesium alkoxides in alcohol can be used directly [...]

* Idemitsu Kosan Co. Ltd., Japan Pat. JP58041832 (1983) - Chem. Abstr. 99, 104778v (1983)

Acta Chemica Scandinavica 53(12), 1117-1121 (1999)

Bulletin de la Societe Chimique du France, 5(2), 1202 (1935)
Journal of the Chemical Society Dalton Transactions, 2139-2142 (1983)
Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie, 207-215 (1967)

MAGNESIUM-MEDIATED ORTHO-FORMYLATION OF PHENOLS1

2-OH-5-MeO-benzaldehyde from 4-MeO-phenol, Mg(OMe)2, and paraformaldehyde in MeOH/toluene. Yield: 97%

The procedures are described for (nonyl)Phenol, simply use an equimolar amount of 4-Methoxyphenol instead.

EXPERIMENTAL

2 de 7 24/03/2018 17:18
Synthesis of 2,5-Dimethoxybenzaldehyde - [www.rhodium.ws] https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/chemistry/25-dimethoxy...

Phenol (37.6 g, 0.4 mol) was added to magnesium methoxide (259 g of 8% (w/w) solution in methanol;
20.7 g, 0.24 mol) and the mixture was heated to reflux. Approximately half of the methanol was distilled
off and toluene (300 g) was added to the residue. The azeotropic mixture of toluene and and methanol
was removed by fractional distillation, until the temperature of the reaction rose to 95°C. A slurry of
paraformaldehyde powder (43.2 g, 1.44 mol) in toluene (75 g) was added in small portions over 1 h to the
reaction mixture at 95°C with concurrent removal of the volatile materials by didtillation. Stirring was
continued at 95°C for 1 h, after which the mixture was cooled to 25°C and added slowly to 10% sulfuric
acid (450 g), The resulting mixture was stirred at 30-40°C, after which the aqueous layer was separated
and extracted with toluene (2x100 g). The combined organic layers and extracts were washed with 10%
sulfuric acid (50 g) and water (50 g) and evaporated under reduced pressure to give the aldehyde as a
pale yellow oil (48.35 g, 84% w/w by GC and 1H-NMR comparisn against a reference standard and against
a commercial sample of known purity; 83% yield).

In similar reactions they used the following conditions:

Magnesium raspings (7.3 g, 0.3 mol), methanol (112 g), toluene (48.5 g) and magnesium methoxide (1.6
g of 8% w/w solution in methanol; 1.5 mmol) were heated under reflux for 2 h untile the magnesium had
dissolved and hydrogen evolution had ceased. 4-Nonylphenol (112 g, 0.5 mol) was added to the mixture
[...]

CONVENIENT METHOD FOR THE ORTHO-FORMYLATION OF PHENOLS2

2-Hydroxy-5-Methoxybenzaldehyde from 4-Methoxyphenol, MgCl2, Et3N, and paraformaldehyde in MeCN.

Yield: 97% Reaction time: 2 h

Phenolic derivs. are formylated selectively ortho to the hydroxy group by paraformaldehyde with magnesium
dichloride-triethylamine as base. With alkyl-substituted phenols, e.g., 2-, 3-, 4-Methylphenols, excellent yields of the
corresponding salicylaldehyde derivs. were obtained. Similar results were obtained with 2-, 3-, and 4-chloro-
substituted phenols and with 3-and 4-methoxyphenol, while 2-methoxyphenol was unreactive. A good yield of
Methyl 3-formyl-4-hydroxybenzoate was obtained by this method as well, but generally phenols with electron-
attracting groups reacted sluggishly; the long reaction times required caused the formation of byproducts,
particularly MOM-derivs. of the phenols.

EXPERIMENTAL2

Dry (P2O5) paraformaldehyde (135 mmol) was added to a mixture of the phenolic derivative (20 mmol),
commercially available anhydrous magnesium dichloride (30 mmol) and dry (Na) triethylamine (75 mmol)
in acetonitrile (100 mL; distilled over CaH2), and the mixture was heated under reflux for the reaction
time recorded. The mixture was cooled to room temperature after which 5% aq. HCl was added and the
product extracted with ether. The dried (MgSO 4) extract was evaporated and the residue purified by flash
chromatography on silica gel.

2,5-DIMETHOXYBENZALDEHYDE BY DIRECT METHYLATION OF THE CRUDE PRODUCT

FROM THE ORTHO-FORMYLATION OF 4-METHOXYPHENOL8

2,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde finds use in the preparation of photographic developers, textile dyes; and as an
electroplating bath additive. Numerous methods for its preparation have been reported, the two most common being
Gattermann formylation of 1,4-dimethoxybenzene (GB1069409), and alkylation of 2-hydroxy-5-methoxy
benzaldehyde with dimethyl sulfate U.S. Pat. 3,867,458. The first of these methods suffers from the need to use
highly toxic and volatile hydrogen cyanide under acidic conditions. The second uses no toxic gases, but the
2-hydroxy-5-methoxybenzaldehyde must be purified before the final alkylation step. This invention allows for a
synthesis of 2,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde that avoids the use of highly toxic cyanides while simultaneously
eliminating the need for a time-consuming distillation step.

A common method for preparing the 2-hydroxy-5-methoxy benzaldehyde comprises reacting a magnesium salt of
4-methoxyphenol (Mg2+ supplied as either Mg(MeO)29 or MgCl22) with paraformaldehyde [a source of anhydrous
formaldehyde] followed by acidic quench and workup/purification (Reaction I).

Typically, distillation or chromatography of the 2-hydroxy-5-methoxy-benzaldehyde product has been required in

order to achieve a good yield in the alkylation step. A recent article2 claims a 97% for the subject compound, which
indicates few by-products. However, repetition of that disclosure (Example 1a) indicates the presence of several
impurities that lower the assay and the yield, necessitating purification prior to alkylation (cf. Examples 1b and
1c).

We have discovered that unpurified, or crude, reaction product obtained from the formation of the 2-hydroxy-
5-methoxybenzaldehyde, can be treated in situ with an alkali hydroxide to generate substantially pure metal salts of
2-hydroxy-5-methoxy-benzaldehyde [Reaction II], which can be separated by filtration, and which are suitable for

3 de 7 24/03/2018 17:18
Synthesis of 2,5-Dimethoxybenzaldehyde - [www.rhodium.ws] https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/chemistry/25-dimethoxy...

alkylation with dimethylsulfate to thereby produce 2,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde.

Example 1a:
Preparation 2-Hydroxy-5-Methoxybenzaldehyde from 4-Methoxyphenol
A mixture of 600 g of acetonitrile, 186.2 g of 4-methoxyphenol (1.5 moles) and 214 g (2.25 moles) of anhydrous
magnesium chloride was warmed to 45°C. and 227.4 g (2.25 moles) of triethylamine was added dropwise at that
temperature. Paraformaldehyde (150 g, 4.75 moles) was then added and the reaction was heated to reflux.
Methanol was removed over 3 hours by distillation, using a 10-inch column packed with Penn-State packing. The
weight of the methanol removed (vapor temperature 60-65°C.) was 130g. The solution was cooled to 60°C. and
added to 900 mL of water. The solution was acidified with 240 mL of conc. HCl and extracted with 150 g of ethyl
acetate. The ethyl acetate solution was washed once with 300 mL of tap water, clarified through diatomaceous
earth, and stripped on a rotary evaporator at 10 mm pressure and 85°C. bath temperature. The weight of the
product was 206.5 g, the liquid chromatograph area percent was 86%, and liquid chromatograph weight percent
was 82%. The overall assay yield was 74%.

Example 1b:
Methylation of crude 2-Hydroxy-5-Methoxybenzaldehyde
The above crude oil (6.1 g, 81% assay, 0.33 moles), 25 mL of acetone, 6.8 g of potassium carbonate, and 5 g of
dimethylsulfate was refluxed for 3 hours and drowned into 200 mL of water. The dark oil solidified overnight, and
the product was collected by filtration and dried to yield 5.6 g of black solid (77% yield, 83% purity).

Example 1c:
Methylation of Distilled 2-Hydroxy-5-Methoxybenzaldehyde
The oil from Example 1a was distilled at 10 mmHg through a 6" Vigreaux column. A light yellow fraction boiling at
124-129°C was collected. The liquid chromatograph area percentage was 95% and the liquid chromatographic
weight percentage was 90%. The overall assay yield based on the starting 4-methoxyphenol was 70%. The distilled
oil was then converted to 2,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde via the procedure in Example 1b. An 82% yield of light
yellow crystals was obtained.

Example 2:
Isolation of the Potassium Salt of 2-Hydroxy-5-Methoxybenzaldehyde
The black oil from Example 1a (202 g, 82% assay, 1.1 moles) was dissolved in 900 g of acetone and the solution
was cooled to 0-5°C and treated dropwise with 136 g of 45% potassium hydroxide solution, holding the temperature
below 5°C. The resulting slurry of bright yellow solid was stirred 30 min and filtered. The product cake was washed
with 750 g of cold acetone, and dried at room temperature in a nitrogen-purged oven. A total of 210 g of bright
yellow product having a weight% assay of 91%, was obtained. The overall yield based on 4-methoxyphenol was
67%.

Example 4
Isolation of the Sodium Salt of 2-Hydroxy-5-Methoxybenzaldehyde
The black oil from Example 1a (45.9 g, 82% assay, 0.25 moles moles) was dissolved in 100 g of ethyl acetate and
the solution was cooled to 0-5°C. and treated dropwise with 20 g of 50% sodium hydroxide solution, holding the
temperature below 5°C. The resulting slurry of bright yellow solid was stirred 1 hour and filtered. The product cake
was washed with 75 g of cold ethyl acetate, and dried at room temperature in a nitrogen-purged oven. A total of
39.1 g of bright yellow product, weight percent assay by HPLC of 72% (area % was 98.4) was obtained. The overall
yield based on 4-methoxyphenol was 48%.

Example 5
Alkylation of the Potassium Salt in Acetone
A slurry of 21.7 g of the potassium salt (90 wt % assay, 0.103 moles), 100 mL of acetone, and 15 g (0.119 moles)
of dimethyl sulfate was warmed to 35-40°C. and held at that temperature for 2 hours at which point an analysis by
TLC indicated that the reaction was complete. The resulting slurry was drowned into 300 mL of water and the
resulting light yellow crystals were filtered off, washed with water, and air-dried. The weight of product was 15.1 g
(88.3% yield).

Example 7
Alkylation of the Potassium Salt in Isopropyl Alcohol
A slurry of 19.0 g of potassium salt (90 wt% assay, 0.09 moles), 65 g of isopropyl alcohol, 0.1 g of
tetrabutylammonium bromide, and 13.9 g (0.11 moles) of dimethyl sulfate was warmed to 35-40°C. and held for 30
minute at which time an analysis by TLC indicated that the reaction was complete. The resulting slurry was treated
with 65 g of water and the product slurry was cooled to 20°C. The product was collected by filtration and washed
with 50% aqueous isopropyl alcohol, and dried. The product weight was 10.9 g (70% yield).

Example 8
Alkylation of the Sodium Salt in Acetone
A slurry of 7.87 g of sodium salt (73 wt% assay, 0.033 moles), 25 mL of acetone, and 5 g (0.04 moles) of dimethyl
sulfate was refluxed for 3 hours at which time an analysis by TLC indicated that the reaction was complete. The
resulting slurry was drowned into 200 mL of water and the resulting light yellow crystals were filtered off, washed
with water, and air-dried. The weight of product was 5.1 g (88.3% yield).

2,5-DIHYDROXYBENZALDEHYDE (GENTISANALDEHYDE)

4 de 7 24/03/2018 17:18
Synthesis of 2,5-Dimethoxybenzaldehyde - [www.rhodium.ws] https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/chemistry/25-dimethoxy...

FROM 3-HYDROXYBENZALDEHYDE

Neubauer and Flatow3 prepared 2,5-dihydroxybenzaldehyde by the oxidation of salicylaldehyde but the present
method with m-hydroxybenzaldehyde as initial material gives an improved yield of a less crude product.

Gentisinaldehyde could not be obtained from 2-nitro-5-hydroxybenzaldehyde by reduction, diazotisation and

decomposition of the azo-compounds. The latter could however be obtained in 30% yield.

EXPERIMENTAL4

A solution of m-hydroxybenzaldehyde (61 g) and NaOH (25 gr) in water (400 mL), while being vigorously
stirred and kept at 30-35°C, is treated simultaneously from separate dropping funnels with aqueous
solutions of potassium persulphate (150 gr in 1500 mL) and NaOH (200 mL, 40%), the additions being
made during 90 min. at such rates that the mixture is always alkaline. After 36 hours of standing, the
deep brown solution is rendered faintly acidic (Congo Red paper), and unchanged m-hydroxybenzaldehyde
(31 g) is extracted with ether. The solution is then strongly acidified (350 mL of conc HCl) and heated
slowly to 70°C, the dark brown amorphous precipitate which forms gradually, being filtered off (this
substance, which chars above 330°C, is almost insoluble in all organic solvents, but readily soluble in aq.
Na2CO3 - it contains the aldehyde group as shown by the formation of the p-nitrophenylhydrazone, and
invariably constitutes about 40% of the yield). The 2,5-dihydroxybenzaldehyde is extracted from the
filtrate by ether, ether removed by evaporation, and the residue extracted by benzene. Yield 13g, mp
89-92°C. This substance crystallises from benzene in bright yellow needles, but they still contain solvent.
They rapidly effloresce at room temperature, leaving yellow needles, mp. 98-99°C.

2-ALKOXY-5-METHOXYBENZALDEHYDES FROM
2-HYDROXY-5-METHOXYBENZALDEHYDE7

A process for preparing 2-methoxy- and 2-ethoxy-5-methoxybenzaldehyde by alkylating 2-hydroxy-

5-methoxybenzaldehyde with dimethyl- or diethyl sulfate in the pressence of potassium carbonate.

EXPERIMENTAL

Example 1

50 g of 2-hydroxy-5-methoxybenzaldehyde, 68 g of potassium carbonate and 50 g of dimethyl sulfate

were refluxed in 250 mL of acetone for about 3 hours under stirring. After the reaction, the reaction
mixture was filtered and the acetone was distilled off from the filtrate and then the residue was poured
into 300 mL of water. The precipitated crystals were collected by filtration and dried whereby 45 g of 2,5-
dimethoxybenzaldehyde having a melting point of 48°C were obtained (Yield: 82.5%).

Example 2

On standing the mixture of 2-hydroxy-5-methoxybenzaldehyde, potassium carbonate and dimethyl sulfate

as in Example 1 at room temperatures the reaction was completed in 7 days. This was confirmed by gas
chromatography. By treating the reaction mixture as described in Example 1, 44.5 g of 2,5-
dimethoxybenzaldehyde having a melting point of 47°C were obtained (Yield: 81.5%).

Example 4

By repeating the procedures described in Example 1 except that 31 g of diethyl sulfate were used instead
of 50 g of dimethyl sulfate, 53 g of 2-ethoxy-5-methoxybenzaldehyde having a melting point of 47-48°C
were obtained (Yield: 97.5%).

2-HYDROXY-5-METHOXYBENZALDEHYDE
TO 2,5-DIMETHOXYBENZALDEHYDE

5 de 7 24/03/2018 17:18
Synthesis of 2,5-Dimethoxybenzaldehyde - [www.rhodium.ws] https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/chemistry/25-dimethoxy...

Written by Antoncho

4,7 g of crude dark-brown 2-hydroxy-5-MeO-benzaldehyde obtained by Reimer-Tiemann formylation (steam-

distilled) was placed into a 150ml three-necked RBF. There was added 25mls dioxane (undried, but kept over FeSO4
to remove peroxides), 5g freshly fused potassium carbonate, 1ml MeOH (Note 1) and, at last, 2mls (4,6g = 25%
molar xcess) methyl iodide. The central neck of the flask was fitted w/a condenser, one of the side-necks - w/a
thermometer, and the 3rd one was plugged to bee later used for various tests and additions. The apparatus was
flushed w/butane and all was brought to a very gentle reflux on a waterbath.

The temp, measured inside the boiling liquid, at first was ~77°C, increased to 85°C in ~30mins, and went up to
92°C over the next 3 hours. Boiling was cont'd overnight (Note 2)

An aliquot of the liquid was taken w/a syringe, acidified, evaporated under draught to remove carcinogenic dioxane
and smelled. The specific smell of unreacted starting material was apparent, mixed w/a somewhat similar, but
sweet, aroma of p-diMeO-benzene (Note 3).

So 0,7mls of MeI were added and reflux recommenced. After 4 hrs (internal temp 92°C) another test was taken
which again indicated the presence of the starting material. Another 0.7 mls MeI were added and refluxed for
several more hours; the third test revealed the completion of the rxn.

The rxn was flooded with 60 ml of 20% KOH, saturated w/NaCl and xtracted w/ 30+15 mls of IPA. Alcohol was
separated, some 10g of Na2SO4 were added in a faint attempt of drying, followed by 90mls of saturated aq.
metabisulfite. The mixtr was subjected to vigorous mech stirring for 7 min and the precipitate (which ended up in
the alcohol layer) was filtered, washed twice with a lil IPA to almost completely remove yellow coloration (Note 4),
pressed between filter paper and somewhat dried under draught. Still containing some IPA, it weighed 8.7g.

Thus obtained adduct was thrown into 50mls of pre-chilled in the freezer 20% KOH, stirred and left for 30 mins in
warm water (Note 5). Precipitated aldehyde was filtered, washed with water 3 times, pressed between filters as dry
as possible, chopped on a plate and left to air-dry. Still containing a little water, it was off-white, but still pretty,
vanillin-like powder without any noticeable smell and weighed 3.6g (Note 6). After drying it was 2.7g.

NOTES:

1. Dioxane was chosen for the following reasons:

a. a much higher bp as compared to acetone

b. unreactivity towards the carbonyl group, which is a possible disadvantage of using acetone
c. ability to dissolve both MeI and, to some xtent, alkali.

The rationale beehind addind MeOH was the following: K2CO3 reacts with it to form KHCO3 and KOCH3. The
latter, being more soluble than K2CO3, was supposed to act as sort of a PTC. Unfortunately, it later turned out
that SWiHKAL's MeOH was VERY wet (not to mention water in dioxane), so the effectiveness of this additive
remains to bee researched. In any case, the two-fold amt of MeI that was required for the rxn, warrants further
investigation. Probably, unhydrous conditions would bee better. Maybee, methanol shouldn't bee added at all - to
minimize hydro/methanolysis of MeI, which is the major side rxn.
2. Probably, there is no need to reflux the mixture more than 30-60 min after the internal temp reached maximum.
SWiHKAL just wanted to bee sure.
3. p-MeO-phenol is a major impurity contained in the hydroxyaldehyde isolated by steam-distillation from a RT
formylation. It's hard to estimate, but there is quite a bit of it in there, probably not less than 20%.
4. This intensely colored yellow impurity is, probably, benzoquinone which survives all the transformations since its
usage in methylation of hydroquinone. The next time SWiHKAL does that, he'll first try to remove it with bisulfite
from the crude p-MeO-phenol.
5. SWiHKAL wanted to make sure all adduct decomposed. Since the appearance of the substance virtually doen't
change, several tests were needed to confirm that. However, decomposition of the adduct seems to proceed fast
even w/cold KOH.
6. The mp was measured and found to bee circa 45°C, whereas the lit value is 51°C. Could anyone suggest to what
kind of (im)purity that corresponds?

REFERENCES

1. R. Aldred et al., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 1823 (1994)

2. N. U. Hofsløkken, L. Skattebøl, Convenient Method for the ortho-Formylation of Phenols, Acta Chem. Scand.
53, 258-262 (1999)
3. Neubauer and Flatow, Z. Physiol. Chem. 52, 375 (1907)
4. J. Chem. Soc. 2339 (1927)
5. Process of Synthesizing 2-Hydroxy-5-Methoxybenzaldehyde, Brit. Pat. 1,377,317

6 de 7 24/03/2018 17:18
Synthesis of 2,5-Dimethoxybenzaldehyde - [www.rhodium.ws] https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/chemistry/25-dimethoxy...

6. Leon Rubenstein, Substitution in Derivatives of Quinol Ethers, J. Chem. Soc. 127, 1998-2004 (1925)
7. I. Shinichi, S. Kazuya, Process for Preparing 2-Alkoxy-5-Methoxybenzaldehyde, US Pat. 3,867,458
8. Process for preparing 2,5-Dimethoxybenzaldehyde, US Pat. 6,670,510
9. Levin Daniel, Preparation of 2-hydroxyarylaldehydes, Eur. Pat. EP0529870

7 de 7 24/03/2018 17:18