A Summary of Actuarial Formulae and Tables: Curtin Student Actuarial Society Last Updated: February 20, 2019
A Summary of Actuarial Formulae and Tables: Curtin Student Actuarial Society Last Updated: February 20, 2019
A Summary of Actuarial Formulae and Tables: Curtin Student Actuarial Society Last Updated: February 20, 2019
Document conventions 3
Disclaimer 3
Acknowledgments 3
A Actuarial Formulae 4
1 Mathematical Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.1 Series . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2 Calculus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3 Solving Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.4 Gamma Function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.5 Bayes’ Formula . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2 Statistical Distributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1 Discrete Distributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.2 Continuous distributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.3 Compound Distributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.4 Truncated Moments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Relationships between statistical distributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3 Statistical Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.1 Sample Mean and Variance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.2 Parametric Inference (Normal Model) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.3 Maximum Likelihood Estimators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.4 Linear Regression Model With Normal Errors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.5 Analysis of Variance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
3.6 Generalised Linear Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
3.7 Bayesian Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
3.8 Empirical Bayes Credibility – Model 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.9 Empirical Bayes Credibility – Model 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4 Compound Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
5 Survival Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
5.1 Mortality “Laws” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
5.2 Empirical Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
5.3 Mortality Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
5.4 General Markov Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
5.5 Graduation Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
5.6 Multiple Decrement Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
5.7 Population Projection Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
6 Annuities and Assurances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
6.1 Approximations for Non Annual Annuities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
6.2 Moments of Annuities and Assurances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
6.3 Premiums and Reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
6.4 Thiele’s Differential Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
7 Stochastic Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
7.1 Markov “Jump” Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
7.2 Brownian Motion and Related Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
7.3 Monte Carlo Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
8 Time Series . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
8.1 Time Series – Time Domain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
8.2 Time Series – Time Frequency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
8.3 Time Series – Box-Jenkins Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
9 Economic Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
9.1 Utility Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
9.2 Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
9.3 Interest Rate Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
10 Financial Derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
10.1 Price of a Forward or Futures Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
10.2 Binomial Pricing (“Tree” Model) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
10.3 Stochastic Differential Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
10.4 Black-Scholes Formulae for European Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
10.5 Put-Call Parity Relationship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
C Statistical tables 46
Standard Normal probabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Standard Normal percentage points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
t percentage points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
χ2 probabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
χ2 percentage points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
F percentage points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Piosson Probabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Binomial Probabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Critical values for the grouping of signs test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Pseudorandom values from U (0, 1) and from N (0, 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Introduction
This document is designed to provide information on the formulae which are relevant to actuarial science units at Curtin
university. Actuarial students are provided with selected formulae prepared by the UK Institute and Faculty of Actuaries
for use in all examinations that follow their curriculum, which Curtin (and Australia as a whole) adhere to. Students
are typically provided with a pdf document including the required formulae on Blackboard in any units where they are
provided in the exam but this is simply an abridged version a publication which is available for purchase (Curtin students
need not purchase it) known as the “orange book” (for the fact that it has an orange cover). In addition to excerpts
from the orange book, Curtin students are often also provided with a copy of separate publication called ‘Mathematical
Formulae and Statistical Tables for Tertiary Institutions’ in exams as an alternative to the statistical tables that appear
in the orange book. This book is often used in first year statistics units so having a copy and being familiar with it is
recommended. Also note that in spite of the orange book being created in 2002, the actuaries institute are not introducing
a new formula and tables for the new curriculum (at least for now).
These formulae are not provided in all units. The units for which these formulae are provided in the exam are those
for which actuarial exam conditions are adhered to. These conditions include:
• 3 hour exams
• Exams weighted higher than 50% (typically 60% or 70%)
• Actuarial tables and formulae provided
• Students are not permitted to bring any notes of their own into actuarial exams
X Completely satisfied
(p) Partially satisfied (students are sort of eased into it in earlier units).
Document conventions
• In orange boxes, are the formulae and tables which are actually provided in actuarial exams. The color orange was
chosen because these are the formulae that appear in the ‘orange’ book (see Introduction).
• In the green boxes are some extensions made to the formulae and tables you will be provided with that you may
wish to remember. That is to say anything in the green boxes is not in the formula sheet you are given in the exam
but they are formulae you might be expected to draw upon in the exam.
• Red text is used when a formula or table is described instead of being explicitly given in this document.
• Blue text will be used to indicate the actuarial units in which a formula or table is used.
• An asterisk* after a unit name indicates that the actuarial tables and formulae are not provided in the unit but they
are still involved in this document in some way (usually because they are a unit in which a formula is introduced or
explained).
Disclaimer
The validity of the information in this document cannot be guaranteed. Curtin units and the actuarial curriculum change
over time.
This document was typeset in LaTeX in an attempt to make all the formulae appear as similarly as possible to the
ones in the orange book. Subtle and superficial differences may exist.
Should you find any errors in this document please let us know via our website. Link:
https://www.curtinactuary.com/actuarial-formulae/corrections.
Acknowledgments
This document was devised and prepared as an extension to the SAS Guide by Tim Gummer, our Honours Representative
for 2019. Assistance and suggestions for revisions were provided for versions 1 and 2 of this document by 2018 secretary
Tom Marshall.
This document was created using document preparation and typesetting language LATEX by way of the online editor
Overleaf.
A Actuarial Formulae
1 Mathematical Methods
1.1 Series
Formula 1.1.1: Exponential Function
x2 x3
exp(x) = ex = 1 + x + + + ···
2! 3!
This formula may be familiar to some students from high school but it is also taught in MATH1016 Calculus 1* and
MATH1018 Accelerated Mathematics 2* under the topic of Taylor series.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
1.2 Calculus
Formula 1.2.1: Taylor series (one variable)
h2 00
f (x + h) = f (x) + hf 0 (x) + f (x) + · · ·
2!
Taylor series are covered in MATH1016 Calculus 1* or MATH1018 Accelerated Mathematics 2*. You will have likely
seen it in a different form however.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3002 Risk Analysis and Credibility Theory
1 2 00
f (x + h, y + k) = f (x, y) + hfx0 (x, y) + kfy0 (x, y) + 00
h fxx (x, y) + 2hkfxy 00
(x, y) + k 2 fyy (x, y) + · · ·
2!
Z b Z b
dv
u dx dx = [uv]ba − v du
dx dx
a a
Integration by parts is covered in MATH1016 Calculus 1* or MATH1017 Accelerated Mathematics 1*. It is a common
integration technique. Most students will likely have remembered this formula by this time but . . .
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3006 Life Contingencies 1
• MATH3007 Life Contingencies 2
• STAT3002 Risk Analysis and Credibility Theory
!
Z b Z x Z b Z b
f (x, y) dy dx = f (x, y) dx dy or
a a a y
Z b Z x Z b Z x
dx dy f (x, y) = dy dx f (x, y)
a a a a
The domain of integration here is the set of values (x, y) for which a ≤ y ≤ x ≤ b
These are covered for the first time in STAT1001 Statistical Probability, but are given more detail in MATH2009
Calculus 2*.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT2001 Mathematical Statistics
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
The general solution of the difference equation axn+2 + bxn+1 + cxn = 0 is:
This formula is derived in MATH1017 Accelerated Mathematics 1*, but simply taken as a fact in STAT3001 Statistical
Modelling.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT2001 Mathematical Statistics
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
• STAT3002 Risk Analysis and Credibility Theory
Γ(x) = (x − 1)Γ(x − 1)
Γ(n) = (n − 1)!, n = 1, 2, 3, . . .
√
Γ(1/2) = π
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT2001 Mathematical Statistics
P (B|Ai )P (Ai )
P (Ai |B) = P
n , i = 1, 2, . . . , n.
P (B|Aj )P (Aj )
j=1
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
2 Statistical Distributions
Formula 2.0.1: Notation
Note. Where formulae have been omitted below, this indicates that (a) there is no simple formula or (b) the
function does not have a finite value or (c) the function equals zero.
These conventions will have been first encountered in STAT1001 Statistical Probability.
This notation is used throughout 2.1 and 2.2
Extension 2.0.1.1: Common alternative conventions
This is a commonly used transformation for the following properties which follow from 2.0.1.3 and some basic
differentiation techniques:
0
CX (0) = E(X)
00
CX (0) = var(X)
h 3 i
000
CX (0) = E X − E(X)
(note that higher order derivatives do not continue this nice pattern).
n x n−x
PF: p(x) = p q , x = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n
x
Coefficient
q−p
of skewness: √
npq
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3005 Survival Analysis
• STAT2001 Mathematical Statistics
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
Parameter: µ (µ > 0)
e−µ µx
PF: p(x) = , x = 0, 1, 2, . . .
x!
t
−1)
MGF: M (t) = eµ(e
Coefficient
1
of skewness: √
µ
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
x − 1 k x−k
PF: p(x) = p q , x = k, k + 1, k + 2, . . .
k−1
k
ps
PGF: G(s) =
1 − qs
!k
pet
MGF: M (t) =
1 − qet
k kq
Moments: E(X) = , var(X) = 2
p p
Coefficient
2−p
of skewness: √
kq
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT2001 Mathematical Statistics
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
• STAT3002 Risk Analysis and Credibility Theory
Γ(k + x)
PF: p(x) = pk q x , x = k, k + 1, k + 2, . . .
Γ(x + 1)Γ(k)
k
ps
PGF: G(s) =
1 − qs
!k
pet
MGF: M (t) =
1 − qet
k kq
Moments: E(X) = , var(X) = 2
p p
Coefficient
2−p
of skewness: √
kq
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT2001 Mathematical Statistics
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
• STAT3002 Risk Analysis and Credibility Theory
h
PF: p(x) = , x = a, a + h, a + 2h, . . . , b − h, b
b−a+h
!
h sb+h − sa
PGF: G(s) =
b−a+h sh − 1
!
h e(b+h)t − eat
MGF: M (t) =
b−a+h eht − 1
1 1
Moments: E(X) = (a + b), var(X) = (b − a)(b − a + 2h)
2 12
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT2001 Mathematical Statistics
Parameters: none
1 1 2
PDF: f (x) = √ e− 2 x , −∞ < x < ∞
2π
1 2
MGF: M (t) = e 2 t
1 Γ(1 + r)
E(X r ) = , r = 2, 4, 6, . . .
2r/2 Γ(1 + 2r )
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
Parameters: µ, σ 2 (σ > 0)
( 2 )
1 1 x−µ
PDF: f (x) = √ exp − , −∞ < x < ∞
σ 2π 2 σ
1 2 2
MGF: M (t) = eµt+ 2 σ t
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT2001 Mathematical Statistics
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
• STAT3002 Risk Analysis and Credibility Theory
Parameters: λ (λ > 0)
−1
t
MGF: M (t) = 1 − ,t<λ
λ
1 1
Moments: E(X) = , var(X) = 2
λ λ
Γ(1 + r)
E(X r ) = , r = 1, 2, 3, . . .
λr
Coefficient
of skewness: 2
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT2001 Mathematical Statistics
λα α−1 −λx
PDF: f (x) = x e ,x>0
Γ(α)
2λX ∼ χ22α
−α
t
MGF: M (t) = 1 − ,t<λ
λ
α α
Moments: E(X) = , var(X) = 2
λ λ
Γ(α + r)
E(X r ) = , r = 1, 2, 3, . . .
Γ(α)λr
Coefficient
2
of skewness: √
α
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
Formula 2.2.5
The chi-square distribution with ν degrees of freedom is the same as the gamma distribution with parameters
α = ν2 and λ = 21 .
The distribution function for the chi-square distribution is tabulated in the statistical tables section.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT2001 Mathematical Statistics
Parameters: a, b a < b
1
PDF: f (x) = ,a<x<b
b−a
x−a
DF: F (x) =
b−a
1 1 bt
MGF: M (t) = (e − eat )
(b − a) t
1 1
Moments: E(X) = (a + b), var(X) = (b − a)2
2 12
1 1
E(X r ) = (br+1 − ar+1 ), r = 1, 2, 3 . . .
(b − a) r + 1
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT2001 Mathematical Statistics
Γ(α + β) α−1
PDF: f (x) = x (1 − x)β−1 , 0 < x < 1
Γ(α)Γ(β)
α αβ
Moments: E(X) = , var(X) =
α+β (α + β)2 (α + β + 1)
Γ(α + β)Γ(α + r)
E(X r ) = , r = 1, 2, 3, . . .
Γ(α)Γ(α + β + r)
Coefficient
s
2(β − α) α+β+1
of skewness:
α+β+2 αβ
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT2001 Mathematical Statistics
Parameters: µ, σ 2 (σ > 0)
( )
1 1 1 log x − µ
PDF: f (x) = √ exp − ,x>0
σ 2π x 2 σ
1 2 2
2
Moments: E(X) = eµ+ 2 σ , var(X) = e2µ+σ eσ − 1
2
1
σ2
E(X r ) = erµ+ 2 r , r = 1, 2, 3, . . .
Coefficient
2
p
of skewness: eσ + 2 eσ 2 − 1
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT2001 Mathematical Statistics
It can be useful identify the following relationship between the mean and variance of the lognormal distribution:
2 σ2
var(X) = E(X) e −1
This is useful whenever the parameters of a lognormal distribution are estimated by way of the method of moments.
This is done in MATH2004 Theory of Interest and STAT3002 Risk Analysis and Credibility Theory.
αλα
PDF: f (x) = ,x>0
(λ + x)α+1
α
λ
DF: F (x) = 1 −
λ+x
λ αλ2
Moments: E(X) = (α > 1), var(X) = (α > 2)
α−1 (α − 1)2 (α − 2)
Γ(α − r)Γ(1 + r) r
E(X r ) = λ , r = 1, 2, 3, . . . , r < α
Γ(α)
Coefficient
r
2(α + 1) α−2
of skewness: (α > 3)
(α − 3) α
kλ k(k + α − 1)λ2
Moments: E(X) = (α > 1), var(X) = (α > 2)
α−1 (α − 1)2 (α − 2)
Γ(α − r)Γ(k + r) r
E(X r ) = λ , r = 1, 2, 3, . . . , r < α
Γ(α)Γ(k)
γ
PDF: f (x) = cγxγ−1 e−cx , x > 0
γ
DF F (x) = 1 − e−cx
r r 1
Moments: E(X ) = Γ 1 + r = 1, 2, 3, . . .
γ cr/γ
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
• STAT3002 Risk Analysis and Credibility Theory
αγλα xγ−1
PDF: f (x) = ,x>0
(λ + xγ )α+1
α
λ
DF F (x) = 1 −
λ + xγ
r λr/γ
r r
Moments: E(X ) = Γ α − Γ 1+ r = 1, 2, 3, . . . , r < αγ
γ γ Γ(α)
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
• STAT3002 Risk Analysis and Credibility Theory
If X1 , X2 , . . . are IID random variables with MGF MX (t) and N is an independent nonnegative integer-valued
random variable, then S = X1 + · · · + XN (with S = 0 when N = 0) has the following properties:
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT2001 Mathematical Statistics
Mean: λm1
Variance: λm2
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3002 Risk Analysis and Credibility Theory
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
It is not stated anywhere in the formula section of the orange book (but it is in the Standard Normal probabilities
table, which Curtin students aren’t actually provided with in exams since they are replaced with ‘Mathematical
Formulae and Statistical Tables for Tertiary Institutions’) but it is common to use the following notation for a
standard normal random variable (Z ∼ N (0, 1)):
Note that the φ and Φ are the lowercase and uppercase versions respectively of the greek letter ‘phi’.
log L − µ log U − µ
where Lk = − kσ and Uk = − kσ
σ σ
This diagram shows the relationships between all the Discrete Distributions and Continuous distributions above in
the form of a flowchart. It has been omitted due to its cumbersome nature.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
A description of the conventions used in 2.4.3. It has been omitted due to its cumbersome nature.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT2001 Mathematical Statistics
3 Statistical Methods
3.1 Sample Mean and Variance
n
1 X
Sample variance: s2 = x2i − nx2
n − 1 i=1
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT2001 Mathematical Statistics
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
If θ̂ is the maximum likelihood estimator of a parameter θ based on a sample X, then θ̂ is asymptotically normally
distributed with mean θ and variance equal to the Cramér-Rao lower bound
h i
∂2
CRLB(θ) = −1 E ∂θ 2 log L(θ, X)
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT2001 Mathematical Statistics
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3005 Survival Analysis
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
Yi ∼ N (α + βxi , σ 2 ), i = 1, 2, . . . , n
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3006 Investment Science 1
n
X n
X
2
sxx = (xi − x) = x2i − nx2
i=1 i=1
n
X n
X
syy = (yi − y)2 = yi2 − ny 2
i=1 i=1
n
X n
X
sxy = (xi − x)(yi − y) = xi yi − nx y
i=1 i=1
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3006 Investment Science 1
sxy
α̂ = y − β̂x, β̂ =
sxx
n
!
2 1 X 1 s2xy
σ̂ = (yi − ŷi )2 = syy −
n − 2 i=1 n−2 sxx
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
For a random variable Y from the exponential family, with natural parameter θ and scale parameter φ:
yθ − b(θ)
Probability (density) function: fY (y; θ, φ) = exp + c(y, φ)
a(φ)
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
µ
Binomial: g(µ) = log
1−µ
Normal: g(µ) = µ
1
Gamma: g(µ) =
µ
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
• STAT3002 Risk Analysis and Credibility Theory
If x us a random sample of size n from a N (µ, σ 2 ) distribution, where σ 2 is known, and the prior distribution for
the parameter µ is N (µ0 , σ02 ), then the posterior distribution for µ is:
{Xij , i = 1, 2, . . . , N, j = 1, 2, . . . , n}
Xij represents the aggregate claims in the j th year from the i th risk.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3002 Risk Analysis and Credibility Theory
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3002 Risk Analysis and Credibility Theory
Quantity Estimator
E[m(θ)] X
N n
1 X 1 X
E[s2 (θ)] (Xij − X i )2
N i=1 n − 1 j=1
N N n
1 X 1 X 1 X
var[m(θ)] (X i − X)2 − (Xij − X i )2
N − 1 i=1 N n i=1 n − 1 j=1
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
These calculations as well as those for the the means in 3.8.2 can be performed quickly and accurately by making
use of the statistics functionality of most scientific calculators.
Quantity Estimator
N
1 X 2
E[s2 (θ)] S
N i=1 i
2 1
var[m(θ)] S − E[s2 (θ)]
n
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
When applying formula 3.8.4 (and 3.9.4), it is important to remember that the credibility premium is:
Zx + (1 − Z)X
Where
x is an estimate of the credibility premium based on direct data. If we are interested in the k th risk, then in
the notation above, we would set x = X k .
X is an estimate of the credibility premium based on collateral data. Note that this is the same as X in the
formulae above.
This is usually presented as ZX + (1 − Z)µ in the CT notes, however this is inconsistent with the notation used in
the formulae above, so the notation has been adjusted accordingly.
n N X
n
Yij X Pij Xij X Pij Xij
Xij = , Xi = , X=
Pij j=1
Pi i=1 j=1
P
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3002 Risk Analysis and Credibility Theory
Here Xij represents number of claims per year per risk volume. Whether we are more estimating X or Y depends
on the particular problem. We need to use the relationship in 3.9.2 if we want to recover an estimate for Y .
Quantity Estimator
E[m(θ)] X
N n
1 X 1 X
E[s2 (θ)] Pij (Xij − X i )2
N n − 1
i=1 j=1
n
N X N n
1 1 X 1 X 1 X
var[m(θ)] Pij (Xij − X)2 − Pij (Xij − X i )2
P∗ Nn − 1 N n − 1
i=1 j=1 i=1 j=1
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3002 Risk Analysis and Credibility Theory
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3002 Risk Analysis and Credibility Theory
4 Compound Interest
Formula 4.0.1: Increasing/decreasing annuity functions
ä n − nv n n − an
(Ia) n = , (Da) n =
i i
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
t1
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH2004 Theory of Interest
5 Survival Models
5.1 Mortality “Laws”
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3005 Survival Analysis
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3005 Survival Analysis
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3005 Survival Analysis
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3005 Survival Analysis
Formula 5.2.1: Greenwood’s formula for the variance of the Kaplan-Meier estimator
h i2 X dj
var[F̃ (t)] = 1 − F̂ (t)
nj (nj − dj )
tj ≤t
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3005 Survival Analysis
X dj (nj − dj )
var[Λ̃t ] =
n3j
tj ≤t
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3005 Survival Analysis
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3005 Survival Analysis
• MATH3007 Life Contingencies 2
∂ gh X gj jh gh hj
t px = t px µx+t − t px µx+t
∂t
j6=h
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3005 Stochastic Processes
If there are n1 positive signs and n2 negative signs and G denotes the observed number of positive runs, then:
n1 − 1 n2 + 1
t−1 t
P (G = t) = and, approximately,
n1 + n2
n1
!
n1 (n2 + 1) (n1 n2 )2
G∼N ,
n1 + n2 (n1 + n2 )3
Critical values for the grouping of signs test are tabulated in the statistical tables section for small values of n1
and n2 . For larger values of n1 and n2 the normal approximation can be used.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
m−j
1
P
m−j (zi − z)(zi+j − z) m
i=1 1 X
rj ≈ m where z = zi
1
P m i=1
m (zi − z)2
i=1
√
rj × m ∼ N (0, 1) approximately.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3005 Survival Analysis
i2 πi
P
i
rx = P
iπi
i
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3005 Survival Analysis
Formula 5.6.1
For a multiple decrement table with three decrements α, β and γ, each uniform over the year of age (x, x + 1) in
its single decrement table, then
α α 1 β γ 1 β γ
(aq)x = qx 1 − (qx + qx + qx qx )
2 3
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3007 Life Contingencies 2
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
m−1
ä(m)
x ≈ äx −
2m
(m) m−1 Dx+n
äx:n ≈ äx:n − 1−
2m Dx
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3006 Life Contingencies 1
• MATH3007 Life Contingencies 2
Let Kx and Tx denote the curtate and complete future lifetimes (respectively) of a life aged exactly x.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3006 Life Contingencies 1
• MATH3007 Life Contingencies 2
1
Similar relationships hold for endowment assurances (with status · · ·x:n ), pure endowments (with status x : n ),
1
term assurances (with status x : n ) and deferred whole life assurances (with status m| · · ·x ).
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3006 Life Contingencies 1
• MATH3007 Life Contingencies 2
2
Ax − (Ax )2
E[ä Kx +1 ] = äx , var[ä Kx +1 ] =
d2
2
Āx − ( Āx )2
E[ā Tx ] = āx , var[ā Tx ] =
δ2
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3006 Life Contingencies 1
äx+t āx+t
t Vx =1− , tV x = 1 −
äx āx
Similar formulae hold for endowment assurance policies (with statuses · · ·x:n and · · ·x+t:n−t ).
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3006 Life Contingencies 1
• MATH3007 Life Contingencies 2
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
7 Stochastic Processes
7.1 Markov “Jump” Processes
X
∂
Forward equation: ∂t pij (s, t) = pik (s, t)σkj (t)
k∈S
X
∂
Backward equation: ∂s pij (s, t) =− σik (s)pkj (s, t)
k∈S
P
where σij (t) is the transition rate from state i to state j (j 6= i) at time t, and σii = − σij .
j6=i
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
1 X σij X
mi = + mj , where λi = σij
λi λi
j6=i,j6=k j6=i
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3005 Stochastic Processes
If {Bt , t ≥ 0} is a standard Brownian motion, then the following processes are martingales:
1
Bt , Bt2 − t and exp(λBt − λ2 t)
2
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3006 Investment Science 1
• STAT3007 Investment Science 2
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3006 Investment Science 1
If U1 and U2 are independent random variables from the U (0, 1) distribution then
p p
Z1 = −2 log U1 cos(2πU2 ) and −2 log U1 sin(2πU2 )
are independent standard normal variables.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
If V1 and V2 are independent random variables from the U (−1, 1) distribution and S = V12 + V22 then, conditional
on 0 < S ≤ 1,
r r
−2 log S −2 log S
Z1 = V1 and Z2 = V2
S S
are independent standard normal variables.
Pseudorandom values from the U (0, 1) distribution and the N (0, 1) distribution are included in the statistical tables
section.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
8 Time Series
8.1 Time Series – Time Domain
Formula 8.1.1: Sample autocovariance and autocorrelation function
n n
1 X 1X
Autocovariance: γ̂k = (xt − µ̂)(xt−k − µ̂), where µ̂ = xt
n n t=1
t=k+1
γ̂k
Autocorrelation: ρ̂k =
γ̂0
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
(1 + αβ)(α + β) k−1
ρk = α , k = 1, 2, 3, . . .
(1 + β 2 + 2αβ)
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
ρ2 − ρ21
φ1 = ρ1 , φ 2 =
1 − ρ21
det Pk∗
φk = , k = 2, 3, . . . ,
det Pk
1 ρ1 ρ2 ··· ρk−1
ρ1 1 ρ1 ··· ρk−2
ρ2 ρ1 1 ··· ρk−2
where Pk =
.. .. .. .. ..
. . . . .
ρk−1 ρk−2 ρk−3 ··· 1
and Pk∗ equals Pk , but with the last column replaced with (ρ1 , ρ2 , ρ3 , . . . , ρk )> .
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
(1 − β 2 )β k
φk = (−1)k+1 , k = 1, 2, 3, . . .
1 − β 2(k+1)
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
Formula 8.3.1: Ljung and Box ”portmanteau” test of the residuals for an ARMA(p, q) model
m
X rk2
n(n + 2) ∼ χ2m−(p+q)
n−k
k=1
where rk (k = 1, 2, . . . , m) is the estimated value of the k th autocorrelation coefficient of the residuals and n is
the number of data values used in the ARMA(p, q) series.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
In a sequence of n independent random variables the number of turning points T is such that:
2 16n − 29
E(T ) = (n − 2) and var(T ) =
3 90
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
9 Economic Models
9.1 Utility Theory
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3006 Investment Science 1
U 00 (w)
Absolute risk aversion: A(w) = −
U 0 (w)
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3006 Investment Science 1
cov(Ri , RM )
Ei − r = βi (EM − r) where βi =
var(RM )
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3006 Investment Science 1
σp
Ep − r = (EM − r)
σM
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3006 Investment Science 1
Let P (τ) be the price at time 0 of a zero-coupon bond that pays 1 unit at time τ.
Let s(τ) be the spot rate for the period (0, τ).
Spot rate
1
P (τ) = e−τs(τ) or s(τ) = − log P (τ)
τ
Instantaneous forward rate
Z τ
d
P (τ) = exp − f (s) ds or f (τ) = − log P (τ)
0 dτ
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3007 Investment Science 2
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
9.3.2 is not the way in which this model is presented in the CT8 notes (also the formula students are expected to
used in the STAT3007 exam).
Price of a zero-coupon bond
B(t, T ) = ea(τ)−b(τ)r(t)
Instantaneous forward rate
σ2 σ 2 −ατ
f (τ) = e−ατ r(t) + (µ − )(1 − e −ατ
) + e (1 − e−ατ )
2α2 2α2
where:
1 − e−αt
b(τ) =
α
" #
σ2 σ2
a(τ ) = (b(τ) − τ) µ − 2 − b(τ)2
2α 4α
τ=T −t
R = r(t)
D(τ) = b(τ)
σ2
β=
2α
L=µ−β
10 Financial Derivatives
Formula 10.0.1
F = (S0 − I)erT
For an asset with dividends:
F = S0 e(r−q)T
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
er∆t − d
Up-step probability =
u−d
√
where u ≈ eσ ∆t+q∆t
√
and u ≈ e−σ ∆t+q∆t
dx = a dt + b dz
where a and b are constant and dz is the increment for a Wiener process (standard Brownian motion).
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
dx = a(x, t) dt + b(x, t) dz
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3006 Investment Science 1
• STAT3007 Investment Science 2
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3006 Investment Science 1
• STAT3007 Investment Science 2
Ho-Lee: dr = θ(t) dt + σ dz
Vasicek: dr = a(b − r) dt + σ dz
√
Cox-Ingersoll-Ross: dr = a(b − r) dt + σ r dz
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3007 Investment Science 2
dSt = St (µ dt + σ dz)
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3006 Investment Science 1
∂f ∂f 1 ∂2f
+ (r − q)St + σ 2 St2 2 = rf
∂t ∂St 2 ∂St
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3007 Investment Science 2
Formula 10.4.3: Garman-Kohlhagen formulae for the price of call and put options
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3007 Investment Science 2
Formula 10.5.1
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3007 Investment Science 2
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
This table is relevant to, but never used in MATH2004 Theory of Interest.
• qx
• µx
◦
• ex
You may find some use for this table in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3005 Survival Analysis
• qx
• µx
◦
• ex
You may find some use for this table in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• q[x] , q[x+1]−1 , qx
• µ[x] , µ[x+1]−1 , µx
• e[x] , e[x+1]−1 , ex
The following commutation factors are tabulated for ages (x) 17 to 110, using a rate of interest of 4%:
• D[x] , D[x+1]−1 , Dx
• N[x] , N[x+1]−1 , Nx
• S[x] , S[x+1]−1 , Sx
• C[x] , C[x+1]−1 , Cx
• M[x] , M[x+1]−1 , Mx
• R[x] , R[x+1]−1 , Rx
The following quantities are tabulated for ages (x) 17 to 120, using a rate of interest of 4% and 6%:
• ä[x] , äx
• A[x] , Ax
• 2 A[x] , 2 Ax
• (Iä)[x] , (Iä)x
• (IA)[x] , (IA)x
You may find some use for this table in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3006 Life Contingencies 1
• MATH3007 Life Contingencies 2
You may find some use for this table in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3006 Life Contingencies 1
• MATH3007 Life Contingencies 2
• qx
• µx
◦
• ex
The following quantities are tabulated for ages (x) 50 to 105 using a rate of interest of 4%:
• äx
• 2 Ax
You may find some use for this table in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3006 Life Contingencies 1
• MATH3007 Life Contingencies 2
Sickness Table
(Mostly) Life Table 7: S(ID)
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
The following service table and relative salary scale quantities are tabulated for ages (x) 16 to 65:
• `x
• wx
• dx
• ix
• rx
• s∗x
• sx = (1.02)x s∗x
• zx = 13 (sx−3 + sx−2 + sx−1 )
• zx+ 12 = 12 (zx + zx+1 )
The following contribution functions quantities are tabulated for ages (x) 16 to 65 at an interest rate of 4%:
• Dx = v x `x
• Dx = 21 (Dx + Dx+1 )
P
• Nx = Dx
• s Dx = sx Dx
• sN x =
Ps
Dx
• s Dx = sx Dx
The following ill health retirement functions quantities are tabulated for ages (x) 16 to 65 at an interest rate
of 4%:
• āix+ 1
2
1
• = v x+ 2 ix
Cxi
• Mxi =
P i
Cx
i
• Rx = (Mxi − 12 Cxi )
P
• Mxia = Cxia
P
ia
• Rx = (Mxia − 12 Cxia )
P
ia
• s M x = sx (Mxia − 12 Cxia )
ia ia
• s Rx =
Ps
Mx
• z Cxia = zx+ 12 Cxia
• z Mxia =
P z ia
Cx
ia 1 z ia
• z Rx = (z Mxia −
P
2 Cx )
The following age retirement functions quantities are tabulated for ages (x) 16 to 65 at an interest rate of 4%:
• ārx+ 1 (ar65 at 65)
2
1
• Cxr = v x+ 2 rx (v 65 r65 at 65)
• Mxr =
P r
Cx
r P r 1 r
• Rx = (Mx − 2 Cx )
• Cxra = Cxr ārx+ 1 (v 65 r65 ār65 at 65)
2
• Mxra = Cxra
P
ra
• Rx = (Mxra − 12 Cxra )
P
ra
• s M x = sx (Mxra − 12 Cxra )
ra P s ra
• s Rx = Mx
ra
• z Cxra = zx+ 21 Cxra (z65 C65 at 65)
• z Mxra =
P z ra
Cx
ra
• z Rx = (z Mxra − 21 z Cxra )
P
The following Functions for return of contributions, accumulated with interest at 2% p.a., on death
quantities are tabulated for ages (x) 16 to 65 at an interest rate of 4%:
1 1
• j Cxd = v x+ 2 (1 + j)x+ 2 dx
• j Mxd = j Cxd
P
d P j Mxd − 21 j Cxd
• j Rx = x+ 1
(1+j) 2
j
sj d P Mxd − 21 j Cxd
• Rx = sx 1
(1+j)x+ 2
1 1
• j Cxw = v x+ 2 (1 + j)x+ 2 wx
• j Mxw = j Cxw
P
j w
P j Mxw − 12 j Cxw
• Rx = x+ 1
(1+j) 2
j
sj w P Mxw − 12 j Cxw
• Rx = sx 1
(1+j)x+ 2
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3007 Life Contingencies 2
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
This table is relevant to, but never used in STAT3001 Statistical Modelling.
C Statistical tables
Note that this part of the orange book is not provided to Curtin students in examinations. In this section we will indicate
which statistical tables are provided to students in another form in various units.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
Statistical Table Extension 1.1: Notation that appears in the orange book version
The following appears above the standard normal probabilities table in the orange book:
This is not given to students in exams despite the fact that formulae 2.4.1 and 2.4.2 use this notation. This is
indicated in extension 2.4.0.1.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
t percentage points
Statistical Table 3
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
χ2 probabilities
Statistical Table 4
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
Since this distribution is only really used as a distribution for a test statistic in certain hypothesis tests, it’s probabilities
are redundant information if we have access to critical values. Indeed ‘Mathematical Formulae and Statistical Tables for
Tertiary Institutions’, does not contain a probabilities table for the chi-squared distribution.
χ2 percentage points
Statistical Table 5
Instead of this table, curtin students are provided with “Critical points of the chi-squared distribution” from
‘Mathematical Formulae and Statistical Tables for Tertiary Institutions’ in exams which includes:
Critical values for degrees of freedom between 1 and 100 and for right tail probabilities of 0.995, 0.99, 0.95, 0.9,
0.1, 0.05, 0.025, 0.01, 0.005.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• MATH3005 Survival Analysis
• STAT3001 Statistical Modelling
• STAT3002 Risk Analysis and Credibility Theory
F percentage points
Statistical Table 6
This part of the formulae and tables is not used in any Curtin units in which actuarial formulae and tables are
provided in the exam and has thus been omitted.
Piosson Probabilities
Statistical Table 7
Instead of this table, curtin students are provided with “Cumulative probabilities for the Poisson distribution”
from ‘Mathematical Formulae and Statistical Tables for Tertiary Institutions’ in exams which includes:
Probabilities for parameter values between 0.1 and 3 at increments of 0.1, between 3.5 and 10 at increments of 0.5
and x values over a range for which significant changes occur.
In addition, “Individual probabilities for the Poisson distribution” has the same values available.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
Binomial Probabilities
Statistical Table 8
Instead of this table, curtin students are provided with “Cumulative probabilities for the binomial distribution”
from ‘Mathematical Formulae and Statistical Tables for Tertiary Institutions’ in exams which includes:
Probabilities for n values between 2 and 15, as well as n values of 20, 25 and 30, p values between 0.1 and 0.9 with
increments of 0.1 and x values between 0 and n.
In addition, “Individual probabilities for the binomial distribution” has the same values available.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
• STAT3007 Investment Science 2
This is the only table which is actually provided to students directly from the orange book.
You may find some use for this formula in the exam for the following actuarial unit(s):
MATH1016 Calculus 1*
Although this unit does not provide the actuarial tables and formulae in the exam, it does introduce/ derive formulae
from the following sections:
• 1.1 Series
• 1.2 Calculus
• 1.1 Series
• 1.3 Solving Equations
MATH2009 Calculus 2*
Although this unit does not provide the actuarial tables and formulae in the exam, it does introduce/ derive formulae
from the following sections:
• 1.2 Calculus
The following statistical tables are useful in exam for this unit: