RUNNING HEAD: Middle Range Theories 1 Middle Range Theory Utilization and Application Paper Group 1 (Names of Group Members)
RUNNING HEAD: Middle Range Theories 1 Middle Range Theory Utilization and Application Paper Group 1 (Names of Group Members)
RUNNING HEAD: Middle Range Theories 1 Middle Range Theory Utilization and Application Paper Group 1 (Names of Group Members)
Introduction
One of the first researchers to introduce social care in the health fraternity is John Cassel
in 1974. The research he offered was related to the study of animals, where he found out that
making social care stronger would enhance people's health. During that time, researchers had
also discovered that social care had the ability to mediate the bad impacts resulting from stress.
During the period between 1970 and 1980, research explained social support in complex
terms referring to factors like relationships and interactions. Currently, the term is utilized in an
extra abstract way to take into account other factors such as the quantity and quality of support,
perceptions, social behaviours, and systems (Smith, 2019). Moreover, the study and examination
of social support theory have earned extra multidisciplinary attention and are protuberant in
social-psychological nursing and literature. For health workers, particularly home nurse experts,
social care is capable of connecting patient requirements, family evaluation, and health results.
In 1981, Norbeck also added to the social support concept's growth by using it as an
intervention of nursing aimed at improving health results. In his study, the patient's social care
surroundings were evaluated by determining the demand for social care compared to its
accessibility (Fleury, 2009). In his research, he held that if social support was inadequate, there
was a need to develop an intervention strategy which could raise social care. The probable
interventions were to emphasize the firming of the available client's support structure and offer
direct assistance required when a crisis arises. It was found out that enough social care positively
impacted the health results while insufficient social care, which had no any intervention, could
More study has been carried out to examine the relation amid health and social support
model. In 1986, Heller held out that two facets of social care, esteem-improving assessment and
stress-connected and interpersonal dealings, impact nursing results. The research emphasized
that the view of social mingling has a positive effect on the health of persons likened to the
activity of support itself. Heller and his fellow scholars were capable of forming a connection
Cohen et al. also carried out additional research in 2001. They explained two models
which described how social care affects health. In the analysis of the stress-buffering structure,
they specified that it embraces that social care contributes behaviours which promote to health to
the individuals passing through stress (Cohen S., 2001). The support properties in an amenity
ought to reinforce a person's ability to handle situations of stress other than emphasizing
behaviours that may be damaging to health. Those beliefs result in an extra vigorous response to
situations of stress and have the impact of reducing the adverse behavioural reactions. In those
cases, a person is more likely to bear an adaptive comeback to the traumatic condition, hence
avoiding a harmful response that could have otherwise resulted in harmful health impacts. The
other model recommended by Cohen et al. held that social care directly impacted physical and
psychological health. There is a necessity for incorporation into a social system contrary to
separation because this could offer peer pressure and social influence to involve in behaviours
promoting health. Therefore, this results in desired psychological conditions vital to them being a
connections may offer several sources of data relating to informal health maintenance and health
The main point of emphasis in this model is the relation amid healthcare requirements
and social support. The theory makes use of retroductive thinking with the reality that social care
has been offered and the client has gained health well; then social care might be accredited to be
one of the factors contributing to the healing of the patient. It is retroductive thinking because the
authors do not ascertain whether this is the sole factor that resulted in the recovery of the patient
The theory developers have diverse explanations of social care that include numerous
taxonomies, types, constructs, sub concepts, and dimensions. The reality that scholars offer
numerous explanations of social care demonstrates the absence of consensus on nature social
care. Consequently, it appears that there is a lot of difficulty in the study of support interventions
and results, contrasting research results, and establishing the theory. The primary definition of
the idea is that social care is assistance or aid exchanged via interpersonal dealings and social
relations. This is a functioning explanation that is nearly steady with all features of the study. A
clear explanation is offered about the social support concepts, for example, in the explanation of
the functionality and structure of social care. Social care is perceived to be basic when it
emphasizes the provider of social support and might be practical if it focuses on providing social
Several features contribute to the adequacy and quality of social care, and they include
direction, the basis of support, and stability. Social connections are involved, and they can be
explained by the count of groups of people in the vicinity that offer social care. Primary
examples of such people include co-workers, neighbours, family members, close friends, and
MIDDLE RANGE THEORY 5
experts. A connection is established amid the social care theory's main ideas because it is vital
for relations to be developed for the aid to be accorded. Social assistance can also be explained
as a well-intended deed that is offered willingly to a person with whom a special connection
Theory analysis
The model acknowledges particular variables which control its view in nursing. The
variables make up the value structures that form the foundation where the theory is anchored on
and may be perceived as apparent presumptions to the theory. The variables that impact social
support theory are duration, timing, support necessity and availability, support source, direction,
social network, and life stage (Wei et al., 2019). A social support system entails a sequence of
activities that comprise the above variables for the sufficient application of the theory.
The social support provider should initially acknowledge the necessity for them to offer
the desired sustenance and determine the type of response which could content the need. If there
is a mismatch amid the necessity of support amid the assistance provider and the recipient,
support may not be taken as helpful (Wei et al., 2019). If the presumption maintains, then that
kind of assistance could solely result in a state of adequacy, reduced self-esteem, and
dependency. Timing is primary since social assistance is a changing process and should be
pertinent on the basis of needs (Aghaei et al., 2020). On the other hand, motivation is an aspect
that has an essential function in social aid and can affect the quality of aid being offered. The
support duration is also put into consideration for people with long-lasting loss and chronic
illnesses.
On the other hand, the support direction can be bidirectional or unidirectional, where
support from relatives is two-way, and that from experts is always one way. The provision for
MIDDLE RANGE THEORY 6
reception of social aid depends on life duration. At a particular level of life, an individual can
offer social assistance, whereas, at other levels, they will require more being given than giving
The theory is well applicable in the context of a family nurse practitioner. When nurses
study the concept, they can gain the expertise and skills to examine patients' interpersonal and
social surroundings. Consequently, they can come up with strategies for improving health and
enable the delivery of self-care practices (Allison et al., 2019). Via network rehabilitation,
clinical officers are able to examine social aid adequacy and utilize available measures of support
An instance of preventive aid is wide-ranging home visits which can be conducted for
affected young moms. In cases of such kind, clinical officers offer steady home visitations to
young moms from the start of pregnancy until children are born and are two years old. The aims
of the visits can be to enhance pregnancy results and positively impact the growth of the infant's
health (Bayuo, 2017). Clinical officers with such a capacity can offer social aid and boost the
An instance of a situation that would come as a contemporary issue for this theory would
be the need to modify the process of seeking or perceiving aid offered by others. The scenario
would, for example, entail a pregnant mother lying on the bed due to high peril pregnancy, and
her partner, who is her sole social supporter, is away. As a family clinical officer, the best
support strategy could include an examination of the existing sources and components of social
aid (Bayuo, 2017). Therefore, it could be wise to teach her the significance of good bed rest,
advise her on the necessity to look for an optional source of assistance, hear her concern out, and
MIDDLE RANGE THEORY 7
plan for aid with children care from accessible social aid systems. The knowledge of the social
aid concept would ascertain that clinical officers can offer client-centred excellent services and
Conclusion
Social sustenance is one of the middle-range theories of nursing, and it addresses the
matters in the interaction and structure which are part of the sequence of relations. The model
has an essential effect on the healthiness condition, health behaviour, and the usefulness of health
facilities. Nurses can always access the social networks of clients. The above fact raises the need
to make use of this model to strengthen and promote the social support desired by the patient.
MIDDLE RANGE THEORY 8
References
Aghaei, M. H., Vanaki, Z., & Mohammadi, E. (2020). Watson’s Human Caring Theory-Based
Management, 13(6).
Allison, T. A., Balbino, R. T., & Covinsky, K. E. (2019). Caring community and relationship
centred care on an end-stage dementia special care unit. Age and ageing, 48(5), 727-734.
Bayuo, J. (2017). Case study in caring application of Watson’s theory of human caring to end of
life care in the burns intensive care unit: A case report. International Journal of Human
Caring, 21(3), 142-144.
Cohen, S., Gottlieb, B. H., & Underwood, L. G. (2001). Social relationships and health:
Fleury, J., Keller, C., & Perez, A. (2009). Social support theoretical perspective. Geriatric
Wei, H., Fazzone, P. A., Sitzman, K., & Hardin, S. R. (2019). The Current Intervention Studies