From The Perspective of Sociology, Issues Such As Class Can Play A Role
From The Perspective of Sociology, Issues Such As Class Can Play A Role
From The Perspective of Sociology, Issues Such As Class Can Play A Role
From the perspective of sociology, issues such as class can play a role
in deviant behavior. Theft, a common instance of deviant behavior, could
be said to be driven by sociological pressures such as poverty.
The symptoms must either be such that they keep the person from
functioning normally in society or cause the person significant
distress. Deviant behavior,behavior that varies from social norms, is not
considered one of the signs of mental illness unless it fits a specific
disorder listed in the DSM.
JUVENILE
1.
moral turpitude n. gross violation of standards of moral conduct,vileness, such
that an act involving moral turpitude was intentionally evil, making the act a
crime. The existence of moral turpitude can bring a more severe criminal charge
or penalty for a criminal defendant.
A number of crimes can fall under the umbrella of moral turpitude, including
murder, fraud, rape, arson, robbery, andcounterfeiting. While someone cannot
be punished specifically for engaging in activity which is considered to be affront
to public morals, he or she can be penalized for the crime itself, potentially
doing jail time, paying fines, and facing other consequences.
2.
Administrative case is basically a case where you are sueing someone or
someone is sueing you. It has to do with something that happened that there
where no criminal acts committed.
A Criminal Case are cases that you where either arrested for or you are going in
front of the judge for a ticket. Something that was a criminal act.
Prosecution by the State of a person or organization, for committing
a public wrong considered an offense againstthe State. Standard of
proof for crimes is higher than for civil wrongs (torts) and, for major crimes such
as a murder, guilt must be established beyond a reasonable doubt (seeproof
beyond a reasonable doubt). Also called criminal suit.
3.
Double jeopardy is a procedural defense that forbids a defendant from
being tried again on the same, or similar charges following a legitimate acquittal
or conviction. At common law a defendant may pleadautrefois
acquit or autrefois convict (a peremptory plea), meaning the defendant has
been acquitted or convicted of the same offense.[1] If this issue is raised,
evidence will be placed before the court, which will normally rule as a
preliminary matter whether the plea is substantiated, and if it so finds, the
projected trial will be prevented from proceeding. In many countries the
guarantee against being "twice put in jeopardy" is a constitutional right; these
include Canada, India, Mexico, and the United States. In other countries, the
protection is afforded by statute law.[3]
First, under double jeopardy, a defendant can not be prosecuted a second time
for the same offense after an acquittal. The second right that double jeopardy
protects is the right a defendant has to not be prosecuted a second time for the
same offense after a conviction. Lasly, the same offense can not warrant
multiple punishments, or sentences. The 5th Amendment also states that a
defendant can not be made to testify in his own criminal proceedings.
Forum shopping occurs when a plaintiff or defendant have two possible courts where a legal c
which court they believe is going to view their case more favorably and is more likely to decid
procedure but is not entirely eliminated.
When concurrent jurisdiction is available, forum shopping can occur. Jurisdiction refers to the
subject matter and personal jurisdiction to be able to preside over a particular case and make
some legal interest in the subject the dispute is about. Personal jurisdiction means the state o
sufficient enough benefit to the plaintiff and defendant that it is fair for the court to decide w
Sometimes, more than one court has both subject matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdictio
New York, both Florida and New York would have personal jurisdiction over them. If a plaintiff
sue in either Florida court or in New York court. Forum shopping can thus occur when two diff
Forum shopping can also occur when both a state and a federal court have the right to hear a
which means they cannot hear as many cases as state courts that have general jurisdiction. A
of federal law or if the two people involved in the case are from different states and if the cas
federal court has exclusive jurisdiction — such as federal bankruptcy cases — but other times
bring the case in state court.
A plaintiff who brings a lawsuit can consider which court he believes will be best
for him and can bring the case there. For example, if the plaintiff is suing over an
employment dispute that involves both state law and Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, which is a federal law, the plaintiff could potentially sue in
state or federal court. The defendant, if he does not wish to be in state court,
could then motion to have the case removed to federal court, so he too has the
right to choose his forum.
In the phil.
The rule on double jeopardy has a settled meaning in Philippine jurisdiction, as provided
in sec.21, Art.III of the Constitution of the Philippineswhich states that "[n]o person shall
be twice put in jeopardy of punishment for the same offense." It only means that when a
person is charged with an offense, and the case is terminated either by acquittal or
conviction or in any other manner without the consent of the accused, the accused
cannot again be charged with the same or identical offense.