Law Quizzes
Law Quizzes
Law Quizzes
1.Give the instrument listed herein which is not negotiable as it is beyond the scope of the
Negotiable Instruments Law:
A. Certificate of Deposit
B. Due Bill
C. Post-Office Money Order
D. Trade Acceptance
2.Under the Negotiable Instruments Law, a certificate of stock is not negotiable instrument
because it lacks the requisites of:
A. Bill of Exchange
B. Check
C. Due Bill
D. Promissory Note
5. Which of the following instruments is not negotiable for the reason that the instrument is not
payable at a determinable future time.
B. “On or before October 30, 2009, I promise to pay B or his order P1,000.00.
Sgd.”A”
C. “Sixty days after sight, I promise to pay to the order of B P1,000.00.
Sgd.”A”
D. “Ten days before the death of X, I promise to pay B or his order P1,000.00.
Sgd.”A”
A. Bill of exchange
B. Check
C. Due bill
D. Promissory note
9. When there are three (3) parties, the drawer, the payee and the drawee, the instrument is a:
A. Promissory note
B. Certificate of indebtedness
C. Bank Check
D. Bill of exchange
A. When the drawer and the drawee are the same person.
B. When the drawee is fictitious.
C. When the instrument is ambiguous.
D. All of the above.
14. Which of the following is not necessary in order to make an instrument negotiable?
B. “Pay to order of C within 6 months from date, the sum of P20,000.00 with interest at 12% per
annum.
To:Z Sgd:”M”
C. “Pay to C or bearer P20,000.00 6 months after date. If not paid on due date, I agree to pay
collection and Attorney’s fees.
To:Z Sgd:”M”
A. Maker
B. Drawer
C. Indorser
D. None of the three.
A. Check
B. Promissory note
C. Bill of exchange
D. Draft
20. Which of the following is necessary requirement in order to make an instrument negotiable?
A. “I promise to pay C or order P20,000.00 if he will pass the CPA examination in October, 2010.”
(Sgd.D)
B. “I promise to pay C or order P20,000.00 in four (4) installment.” (Sgd:D)
C. “I promise to pay C or order P20,000.00 60 days after the death of his father.” (Sgd.D)
D. “I promise to pay C P20,000.00.” (Sgd:D)
25. This is a promissory note: “We promise to pay Dada, Tina and Kate the sum of P18,000.00.” (Signed)
Jing, Baby and Gail.
26. “I promise to pay the bearer, Juan dela Cruz the sum of P20,000.00.”(Signed)Joe Perez. The
promissory note is:
28. Manila
P20,000.00 June 1, 2010
For value received, We promise to pay to the order of Sanrio Lumber Co. at Manila, P20,000.00.
Statement 1. Pedro and Helen are not liable personally because they have disclosed their
principal.
Statement 2. Pedro and Helen are not liable personally because by using the word “WE”
on the body of the instrument, they have indicated that they are signing for
and on behalf of Sanrio Mfg. Corp.
A. True; False
B. False; True
C. Both statements are true.
D. Both statements are false
A. Bond C. Check
B. Due bill D. Certificate of deposit
30. Where in a bill the drawer and the drawee are the same person or where the drawee is a fictitious
person, or a person not having capacity to contract, the holder at his option may treat the instrument as
A. Dishonored
B. Bill of exchange
C. Promissory note
D. Either Bill of exchange or a Promissory note
A. The name of the payee does not purport to be the name of any person.
B. The only or last indorsement is an indorsement in blank.
C. Drawn payable to the order of a specified person or to him or his order.
D. Payable to the order of fictitious or non-existing person, and such fact was known
to the person making it so payable.
32. An instrument is payable at a determinable future time, which is expressed to be payable, except
A. A promise to pay to the order of B P10,000 with 12% interest thereon where the period from
which interest is to be counted is not specified.
B. A promises to pay to the order of B P10,000 in four monthly installments beginning June 12,
2009 with a provision that if A defaults in the payment of any installment, the entire balance
including the unpaid installment shall become due and demandable.
C. A promise to pay to the order of B the sum of US$1,000 payable in pesos at the rate of exchange
prevailing on January 1, 2010.
D. A promises to pay to the order of B P10,000 with an agreement to pay attorney’s fees and costs
of collection.
36. Where the instrument is addressed to a drawee, he must be named or otherwise indicated therein
with reasonable certainty. This requirement is applicable to
3.When there are three (3) parties, the drawer, the payee & the drawee, the instrument is a:
A. Promissory note
B. Certificate of indebtedness
C. Bank check
D, Bill of exchange
9. An endorsement where the indorser adds the phrase “without recourse” is called:
A. Blank indorsement
B. Restrictive indorsement
C. Qualified indorsement
D. Conditional indorsement
11. M makes a promissory note for P2, 000.00 payable to the order of P.P negotiates the note to A who
with the consent of P raises the amount to P20, 000.00 and thereafter indorses it to B. B to C and C to D
who is not a holder in due courses. In this case:
A. B can recover P2, 000.00 as against M.
B. P and A are liable to D for P20, 000.00
C. B and C are not liable to D
D. Answer not given
12. The following are instances when a bank may refuse to pay checks drawn against it, except one:
A. If there is a “stop payment” issued by the drawer
B. When the bank receives notice of the drawer’s death
C. If the drawer’s deposit is insufficient
D. If the drawer is insolvent
13. The following are functions of a negotiable instrument. Choose the exception.
A. It increase purchasing power in circulation
B. As legal tender
C. As substitute for money
D. It increases credit circulation
14. X obtains the signature of Y for autograph purpose. X write a negotiable promissory note above Y’s
signature. The note was validly negotiated to Z who is a holder in due course. What kind of defense can
Y avail against Z?
A. Personal defense
B. Real defense
C. Equitable defense
D. Qualified defense
2. A party secondarily liable is discharged through any of the following means, except by the:
a. Intentional cancellation of his signature by the holder.
b. Discharge of a prior party.
c. Release of the principal debtor.
d. Extension of the time of payment which is assented to by such party secondarily
liable.
4. R draws a check for P100,00.00 payable to the order of P and against his deposit of
P2,000,000.00 at W Bank. The check is indorsed by P to H, holder. H delays the presentment of
the check to W Bank. By the time he presents it for payment, W Bank is already insolvent. R is
abl to recover P500,000.00 from the Philippine Deposit Insurance Corporation on his deposit.
Will R still be liable to H?
a. Yes, for P100,000.00.
b. Yes, for P75,000.00.
c. Yes, for P25,000.00.
d. No, R will no longer be liable because H’s delay in presenting the check for payment totally
discharged him from liability on the check.
5. Refer to the preceeding number. May H go after P, the party who indorsed the check to him?
a. Yes, for P100,000. in view of his warranty as an indorser.
b. Yes, for only P75,000.00.
c. Yes, for only P25,000.00.
d. No, P was discharged by reason of the lack of due presentment of the check.
7. M is the maker of a promissory payable to the order of P which is payable 30 days after date.
The note dated August 1,2015 was issued on the same day by M to P. P indorsed the note to A,
A to B, and B to H. On August 31,2015, H renounced unconditionally his claim on the note
against M who accepted the renunciation. Nonetheless, H still negotiated the note on the same
day to X who had no knowledge of the renunciation. May X still collect on the note from M and
parties subsequent to M?
a. Yes, against M. No, against parties subsequest to M.
b. No, against M. Yes, against parties subsequent to M.
c. Yes, against M and parties subsequent to M.
d. NO, against M and parties subsequent to M.
1. M issued a promissory note payable to the order of P for P50,000.00. Thereafter, P indorsed the
note to A. While the note was in the possession of A, F stole it and negotiated it to B by forging
the signature of A. B was not aware of the forgery of A’s signature. B then indorsed the note to
H, a holder in due course. The parties who may raise forgery as a defense are:
a. A and B.
b. M and P.
c. M, P and A.
d. None of the parties may raise forgery as a defense because H is a holder in due course.
2. Refer to the preceding number. Assume the same facts except that the note is payable to
bearer. In such a case, the parties who may raise forgery as a defense are:
a. A and B.
b. M and P.
c. M, P and A.
d. None of the parties may raise the defense of forgery.
3. M makes a promissory note for P10,000.00 payable to the order of P. After the issuance to him
of the note, P altered the amount to US$10,000.00. P then indorsed the note to A, A to B, and B
to H. Only P knew of the alteration.
If H is a holder in due course, the parties from whom he may collect and the amount of the said
parties’ liability are:
a. I and IV.
b. II and V.
c. I and V.
d. III and VI.
(No Date)
I promise to pay Peter Perez or order the sum of P20,000.00 with interest, thirty days after date, in
payment of the goods I purchased from him today. To secure the amount of this note, I herby
pledge my ring which I authorize Peter Perez to sell in case of my default on due date.
The part of the above instrument that renders it non-negotiable is the phrase or statement:
a. “In payment of the goods that I purchased from him today.”
b. “With interest, thirty days after date.”
c. “To secure the amount of this note, I hereby pledge my ring which I authorize Peter Perez to
sell in case of my default on due date.”
d. The instrument is negotiable notwithstanding the presence of such phrases or statements in
the body thereof.
8. Medardo Medrano has an obligation to give 10 sacks of rice worth P10,000.00 to Pancho Panza,
the same being due on September 5, 2015. Medardo Medrano failed to deliver 10 sacks of rice
to Pancho Panza on due date despite the latter’s demand. Medardo Medrano requested Pancho
Panza to give him a period of 30 days to give the amount of P10,000.00 or to deliver 10 sacks of
rice, assuring Pacho Panza of the payment by issuing the promissory note shown below. Pancho
Panze agreed to Medardo Medrano’s proposal.
September 6,2015
I promise to pay Pancho Panza or order the sum of P10,000.00 or to deliver him 10
sacks of rice.
Which of the above defenses may be raised against a holder not in due course?
a. I and II only.
b. II and III only.
c. I and III only.
d. I, II and III.
10. M delivers a promissory note payable to the order of P for P10,000.00. P alters the amount to
P40,000.00 and thereafter indorses the note to A who had no knowledge of the alteration; then
A to H, holder in due course. Which of the following is incorrect?
a. H can recover P10,000.00 from M.
b. H can recover P40,000.00 from P.
c. H can recover P40,000.00 from A.
d. H cannot recover any amount from M because M is a party before the alteration. H cannot
also recover from A because A was not aware of the alteration.