CH 11
CH 11
,CA
UNSOED
2020
1
Depreciation, CHAPTER 11
Impairments, and Depletion
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Describe depreciation 4. Discuss the accounting
concepts and methods of procedures for depletion of
depreciation. mineral resources.
2
PREVIEW OF CHAPTER 11
Intermediate Accounting
IFRS 3rd Edition
Kieso ● Weygandt ● Warfield
3
LEARNING OBJECTIVE 1
Depreciation—A Method Describe depreciation
concepts and methods of
of Cost Allocation depreciation.
4 LO 1
Depreciation—Method of Cost Allocation
5 LO 1
Factors Involved in Depreciation Process
ILLUSTRATION 11.1
Computation of Depreciation Base
6 LO 1
Factors Involved in Depreciation Process
7 LO 1
Depreciation—Method of Cost Allocation
Methods of Depreciation
The profession requires the method employed be
“systematic and rational.” Methods used include:
1. Activity method (units of use or production).
2. Straight-line method.
a. Sum-of-the-years’-digits.
b. Declining-balance method.
8 LO 1
Methods of Depreciation
Data for
Stanley Coal
Mines
ILLUSTRATION 11.3
Depreciation Calculation,
Activity Method—Crane
Example
9 LO 1
Methods of Depreciation
Data for
Stanley Coal
Mines
ILLUSTRATION 11.4
Depreciation
Calculation,
Straight-Line Method—
Crane Example
10 LO 1
Methods of Depreciation
Data for
Stanley Coal
Mines
Sum-of-the-Years’-Digits
ILLUSTRATION 11.6
Sum-of-the-Years’-Digits Depreciation Schedule—Crane Example
12 LO 1
Methods of Depreciation
Data for
Stanley Coal
Mines
Declining-Balance Method.
◆ Utilizes a depreciation rate (percentage) that is some
multiple of the straight-line method.
◆ Does not deduct the salvage value in computing the
depreciation base.
13 LO 1
Methods of Depreciation
Declining-Balance Method
ILLUSTRATION 11.7
Double-Declining Depreciation Schedule—Crane Example
14 LO 1
LEARNING OBJECTIVE 2
Other Depreciation Issues Identify other depreciation
issues.
Component Depreciation
IFRS requires that each part of an item of property,
plant, and equipment that is significant to the total
cost of the asset must be depreciated separately.
15 LO 2
Component Depreciation
ILLUSTRATION 11.8
Airplane Components
16 LO 2
Component Depreciation
17 LO 2
Component Depreciation
ILLUSTRATION 11.10
Presentation of Carrying Amount of Airplane
18 LO 2
Other Depreciation Issues
19 LO 2
Depreciation and Partial Periods
20 LO 2
Depreciation and Partial Periods
Straight-line Method
Current
Depreciable Annual Partial Year Accum.
Year Base Years Expense Year Expense Deprec.
2019 € 126,000 / 5 = $ 25,200 x 5/12 = € 10,500 $ 10,500
2020 126,000 / 5 = 25,200 25,200 35,700
2021 126,000 / 5 = 25,200 25,200 60,900
2022 126,000 / 5 = 25,200 25,200 86,100
2023 126,000 / 5 = 25,200 25,200 111,300
2024 126,000 / 5 = 25,200 x 7/12 = 14,700 126,000
€ 126,000
Journal entry:
21 LO 2
Depreciation and Partial Periods
Journal entry:
2019 Depreciation expense 4,800
Accumultated depreciation 4,800
22 LO 2
Depreciation and Partial Periods
5/12 = .416667
Sum-of-the-Years’-Digits Method 7/12 = .583333
Current
Depreciable Annual Partial Year Accum.
Year Base Years Expense Year Expense Deprec.
24 LO 2
Other Depreciation Issues
25 LO 2
Other Depreciation Issues
26 LO 2
Revision of Depreciation Rates
Questions:
● What is the journal entry to No Entry
correct the prior years’ Required
depreciation?
● Calculate the depreciation
expense
27 LO 2
for 2019.
After 7
Revision of Depreciation Rates years
28 LO 2
After 7
Revision of Depreciation Rates years
29 LO 2
LEARNING OBJECTIVE 3
Impairments Explain the accounting
issues related to asset
impairment.
Recognizing Impairments
A long-lived tangible asset is impaired when a company
is not able to recover the asset’s carrying amount either
through using it or by selling it.
On an annual basis, companies review the asset for
indicators of impairments—that is, a decline in the
asset’s cash-generating ability through use or sale.
30 LO 3
Recognizing Impairments
ILLUSTRATION 11.15
Impairment Test
31 LO 3
Recognizing Impairments
Example: Assume that Cruz SA performs an impairment
test for its equipment. The carrying amount of Cruz’s
equipment is €200,000, its fair value less costs to sell is
€180,000, and its value-in-use is €205,000.
ILLUSTRATION 11.15
€200,000 €205,000
No
Impairment
€180,000 €205,000
32 LO 3
Recognizing Impairments
Example: Assume the same information for Cruz Company
except that the value-in-use of Cruz’s equipment is
€175,000 rather than €205,000.
€20,000 Impairment Loss
ILLUSTRATION 11.15
€200,000 €180,000
€180,000 €175,000
33 LO 3
Recognizing Impairments
Example: Assume the same information for Cruz Company
except that the value-in-use of Cruz’s equipment is
€175,000 rather than €205,000.
€20,000 Impairment Loss
ILLUSTRATION 11.15
€200,000 €180,000
36 LO 3
Impairment Illustrations
37 LO 3
Impairment Illustrations
Case 2
At the end of 2019, Verma Company tests a machine for
impairment. The machine has a carrying amount of $200,000. It has
an estimated remaining useful life of five years. Because there is
little market-related information on which to base a recoverable
amount based on fair value, Verma determines the machine’s
recoverable amount should be based on value-in-use. Verma uses a
discount rate of 8 percent. Verma’s analysis indicates that its future
cash flows will be $40,000 each year for five years, and it will receive
a residual value of $10,000 at the end of the five years. It is
assumed that all cash flows occur at the end of the year.
ILLUSTRATION 11.16
Value-in-Use Computation
38 LO 3
Impairment Illustrations
Case 2: Computation of the impairment loss on the
machine at the end of 2019.
$33,486 Impairment Loss
ILLUSTRATION 11.15
$200,000 $166,514
Unknown $166,514
39 LO 3
Impairment Illustrations
Case 2: Computation of the impairment loss on the
machine at the end of 2019.
$33,486 Impairment Loss
$200,000 $166,514
Unknown $166,514
40 LO 3
Reversal of Impairment Loss
42 LO 3
Impairments
Cash-Generating Units
When it is not possible to assess a single asset for
impairment because the single asset generates cash flows
only in combination with other assets, companies
identify the smallest group of assets that can be
identified that generate cash flows independently of the
cash flows from other assets.
43 LO 3
Impairments
44 LO 3
ILLUSTRATION 11.18
Graphic of Accounting
for Impairments
45 LO 3
LEARNING OBJECTIVE 4
Depletion Discuss the accounting
procedures for depletion of
mineral resources.
46 LO 4
Depletion
3. Development costs.
47 LO 4
Depletion
Calculation:
Total Cost – Residual value
= Depletion Cost Per
Total Estimated Units Available Unit
48 LO 4
Depletion
49 LO 4
Depletion
Inventory 250,000
Accumulated Depletion 250,000
ILLUSTRATION 11.20
MaClede’s statement of financial position: Statement of Financial Position
Presentation of Mineral Resource
51 LO 4
Depletion
52 LO 4
Depletion
53 LO 4
LEARNING OBJECTIVE 5
Revaluations Apply the accounting for
revaluations.
Recognizing Revaluations
Companies may value long-lived tangible asset
subsequent to acquisition at cost or fair value.
Network Rail (GBR) elected to use fair values to account for its
railroad network.
54 LO 5
Recognizing Revaluation
Revaluation—Land
Illustration: Siemens Group (DEU) purchased land for
€1,000,000 on January 5, 2019. The company elects to use
revaluation accounting for the land in subsequent periods.
At December 31, 2019, the land’s fair value is €1,200,000.
The entry to record the land at fair value is as follows.
Land 200,000
Unrealized Gain on Revaluation - Land 200,000
55 LO 5
Recognizing Revaluation
Revaluation—Depreciable Assets
Illustration: Lenovo Group (CHN) purchases equipment for
¥500,000 on January 2, 2019. The equipment has a useful
life of five years, is depreciated using the straight-line
method of depreciation, and its residual value is zero.
Lenovo chooses to revalue its equipment to fair value over
the life of the equipment. Lenovo records depreciation
expense of ¥100,000 (¥500,000 ÷ 5) at December 31, 2019,
as follows.
Depreciation Expense 100,000
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment 100,000
56 LO 5
Recognizing Revaluation
Revaluation—Depreciable Assets
After this entry, Lenovo’s equipment has a carrying amount
of ¥400,000 (¥500,000 - ¥100,000). Lenovo receives an
independent appraisal for the fair value of equipment at
December 31, 2019, which is ¥460,000.
57 LO 5
Recognizing Revaluation
58 LO 5
Recognizing Revaluation
Revaluations Issues
Company can select to value only one class of assets, say
buildings, and not revalue other assets such as land or
equipment.
If a company selects only buildings,
► revaluation applies to all assets in that class of assets.
► A class of assets is a grouping of items that have a similar
nature and use in a company’s operations.
► Companies must also make every effort to keep the assets’
values up to date.
59 LO 5
LEARNING OBJECTIVE 6
Presentation and Analysis Demonstrate how to report
and analyze property, plant,
equipment, and mineral
resources.
Presentation of Property,
Plant, Equipment, and Mineral Resources
Depreciating assets, use Accumulated Depreciation.
60 LO 6
Presentation and Analysis
ILLUSTRATION 11.24
Asset Turnover
61 LO 6
Presentation and Analysis
ILLUSTRATION 11.25
Profit Margin on Sales
62 LO 6
Presentation and Analysis
ILLUSTRATION 11.26
Return on Assets
63 LO 6
Presentation and Analysis
64 LO 6
Presentation and Analysis
65 LO 6
Revaluation of Property, Plant, and
APPENDIX 11A
Equipment
LEARNING OBJECTIVE 7
Illustrate revaluation accounting procedures.
66 LO 7
Revaluation of Property, Plant, and
APPENDIX 11A
Equipment
67 LO 7
Revaluation of Land
Land 120,000
Unrealized Gain on Revaluation—Land 120,000
(€520,000 − €400,000)
68 LO 7
Revaluation—2019: Valuation Increase
ILLUSTRATION 11A.1
Summary of Revaluation—2019
70 LO 7
Revaluation—2020: Decrease below Cost
ILLUSTRATION 11A.2
Summary of Revaluation—2020
Land 35,000
Unrealized Gain on Revaluation—Land 15,000
Recovery of Impairment Loss 20,000
72 LO 7
Revaluation—2021: Recovery of
Impairment Loss
ILLUSTRATION 11A.3
Summary of Revaluation—2021
73 LO 7
Revaluation—2021: Recovery of
Impairment Loss
ILLUSTRATION 11A.3
Summary of Revaluation—2021
75 LO 7
Revaluation of Depreciable Assets
76 LO 7
Revaluation—2019: Valuation Increase
After this entry, Nokia’s equipment has a carrying amount
of €800,000 (€1,000,000 − €200,000). Nokia employs an
independent appraiser, who determines that the fair value of
equipment at December 31, 2019, is €950,000. To report
the equipment at fair value, Nokia does the following.
77 LO 7
Revaluation—2019: Valuation Increase
After this entry, Nokia’s equipment has a carrying amount
of €800,000 (€1,000,000 − €200,000). Nokia employs an
independent appraiser, who determines that the fair value of
equipment at December 31, 2019, is €950,000. To report
the equipment at fair value, Nokia does the following.
79 LO 7
Revaluation—2020: Decrease below
Historical Cost
Assuming no change in the useful life of the equipment,
depreciation expense for Nokia in 2020 is €237,500
(€950,000 ÷ 4), and the entry to record depreciation expense
on December 31, 2020 as follows.
81 LO 7
Revaluation—2020: Decrease below Cost
82 LO 7
Revaluation—2020: Decrease below Cost
85 LO 7
Nokia transfers the difference between depreciation based on
the revalued carrying amount of the equipment and
depreciation based on the asset’s original cost from AOCI to
retained earnings. Depreciation based on the original cost
was €200,000 (€1,000,000 ÷ 5) and on fair value is €190,000.
86 LO 7
Revaluation—2021: Recovery of Loss
Nokia determines through appraisal that the equipment
now has a fair value of €450,000. To report the equipment
at fair value, Nokia does the following.
88 LO 7
ILLUSTRATION 11A.6
Summary of Revaluation—2021
89 LO 7
ILLUSTRATION 11A.6
Summary of Revaluation—2021
LEARNING OBJECTIVE 8
Compare accounting procedures for property, plant, and equipment
under IFRS and U.S. GAAP.
91 LO 8
GLOBAL ACCOUNTING INSIGHTS
Relevant Facts
Following are the key similarities and differences between U.S. GAAP
and IFRS related to property, plant, and equipment.
Similarities
• The definition of property, plant, and equipment is essentially the
same under U.S. GAAP and IFRS.
• Under both U.S. GAAP and IFRS, changes in depreciation method
and changes in useful life are treated in the current and future
periods. Prior periods are not affected.
• The accounting for plant asset disposals is the same under U.S.
GAAP and IFRS.
92 LO 8
GLOBAL ACCOUNTING INSIGHTS
Relevant Facts
Similarities
• The accounting for the initial costs to acquire natural resources is
similar under U.S. GAAP and IFRS.
• Under both U.S. GAAP and IFRS, interest costs incurred during
construction must be capitalized. Recently, IFRS converged to U.S.
GAAP.
• The accounting for exchanges of non-monetary assets is essentially
the same between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. U.S. GAAP requires that
gains on exchanges of non-monetary assets be recognized if the
exchange has commercial substance. This is the same framework
used in IFRS.
• U.S. GAAP and IFRS both view depreciation as allocation of cost over
93 an asset’s life. U.S. GAAP and IFRS permit the same depreciation LO 8
GLOBAL ACCOUNTING INSIGHTS
Relevant Facts
Differences
• Under U.S. GAAP, component depreciation is permitted but is rarely
used. IFRS requires component depreciation.
• U.S. GAAP does not permit revaluations of property, plant,
equipment, and mineral resources. Under IFRS, companies can use
either the historical cost model or the revaluation model.
• In testing for impairments of long-lived assets, U.S. GAAP uses a
different model than IFRS. Under U.S. GAAP, as long as future
undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying amount of the asset, no
impairment is recorded. The IFRS impairment test is stricter.
However, unlike U.S. GAAP, reversals of impairment losses are
permitted under IFRS.
94 LO 8
GLOBAL ACCOUNTING INSIGHTS
Relevant Facts
Differences
• Under U.S. GAAP, all losses on non-monetary asset exchanges are
recognized immediately.
95 LO 8
GLOBAL ACCOUNTING INSIGHTS
96 LO 8
GLOBAL ACCOUNTING INSIGHTS
On the Horizon
With respect to revaluations, as part of the conceptual framework
project, the Boards will examine the measurement bases used in
accounting. It is too early to say whether a converged conceptual
framework will recommend fair value measurement (and revaluation
accounting) for property, plant, and equipment. However, this is likely
to be one of the more contentious issues, given the long-standing use of
historical cost as a measurement basis in U.S. GAAP.
97 LO 8
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that
permitted in Section 117 of the 1976 United States Copyright
Act without the express written permission of the copyright
owner is unlawful. Request for further information should be
addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley &
Sons, Inc. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his/
her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The
Publisher assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or
damages, caused by the use of these programs or from the
use of the information contained herein.
98