Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur
Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur
Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur
Howrah – 711103
A REPORT ON
Submitted By
The success and final outcome of this project required a lot of guidance and assistance from many
people and I am extremely privileged to have got this all along the completion of my project. All that
I have done is only due to such supervision and assistance and I would not forget to thank them.
I respect and thank Prof. Bijan Kumar Mandal for providing me an opportunity to do the project
work on Nuclear Power Plant and giving us all support and guidance which made me complete the
project duly. I am extremely thankful to him for providing such a nice support and guidance, although
he had busy schedule.
Nevertheless, I express our gratitude toward our families and colleagues for their kind co-operation
and encouragement which help us in completion of this project.
Dated:
IIEST Shibpur, Howrah-711103
Suraj Kumar
Enrolment no. – 511017067
HEAT EXCHANGERS
A heat exchanger is a device used to transfer heat between two or more fluids. The fluids can
be single or two phase and, depending on the exchanger type, may be separated or in direct
contact. Devices involving energy sources such as nuclear fuel pins or fired heaters are not
normally regarded as heat exchangers although many of the principles involved in their
design are the same.
In order to discuss heat exchangers it is necessary to provide some form of categorization.
There are two approaches that are normally taken. The first considers the flow configuration
within the heat exchanger, while the second is based on the classification of equipment type
primarily by construction. Both are considered here.
Figure 1. Countercurrent flow.
In concurrent flow heat exchangers, the streams flow parallel to each other and in the same
direction as shown in Figure 2, this is less efficient than countercurrent flow but does provide
more uniform wall temperatures.
Figure 2. Concurrent flow.
Crossflow heat exchangers are intermediate in efficiency between countercurrent flow and
parallel flow exchangers. In these units, the streams flow at right angles to each other as
shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Crossflow.
In industrial heat exchangers, hybrids of the above flow types are often found. Examples of
these are combined crossflow/counterflow heat exchangers and multi pass flow heat
exchangers. (See for example Figure 4.)
Figure 4. Cross/counter flow.
Classification of Heat Exchangers by Construction
In this section heat exchangers are classified mainly by their construction, Garland (1990),
(see Figure 5). The first level of classification is to divide heat exchanger types into
recuperative or regenerative. A Recuperative Heat Exchanger has separate flow paths for
each fluid and fluids flow simultaneously through the exchanger exchanging heat across the
wall separating the flow paths. A Regenerative Heat Exchanger has a single flow path,
which the hot and cold fluids alternately pass through.
Plate and Frame Heat Exchangers consist of two rectangular end members which hold
together a number of embossed rectangular plates with holes on the corner for the fluids to
pass through. Each of the plates is separated by a gasket which seals the plates and arranges
the flow of fluids between the plates, see Figure 9. This type of exchanger is widely used in
the food industry because it can easily be taken apart to clean. If leakage to the environment
is a concern it is possible to weld two plate together to ensure that the fluid flowing between
the welded plates cannot leak. However, as there are still some gaskets present it is still
possible for leakage to occur. Brazed plate heat exchangers avoid the possibility of leakage
by brazing all the plates together and then welding on the inlet and outlet ports.
Static Regenerators
Static regenerators or fixed bed regenerators have no moving parts except for valves. In this
case the hot gas passes through the matrix for a fixed time period at the end of which a
reversal occurs, the hot gas is shut off and the cold gas passes through the matrix. The main
problem with this type of unit is that both the hot and cold flow are intermittent. To overcome
this and have continuous operation at least two static regenerators are required or a rotary
regenerator could be used.
Rotary regenerator
In a rotary regenerator cylindrical shaped packing rotates about the axis of a cylinder between
a pair of gas seals. Hot and cold gas flows simultaneously through ducting on either side of
the gas seals and through the rotating packing.
Thermal Analysis
The thermal analysis of any heat exchanger involves the solution of the basic heat transfer
equation.
(1)
This equation calculates the amount of heat transferred through the area dA, where Th and
Tc are the local temperatures of the hot and cold fluids, α is the local heat transfer coefficient
and dA is the local incremental area on which α is based. For a flat wall
(2)
where the wall resistance rw is given by 1/αw. The total rate of heat transfer between the hot
and cold fluids is then given by
(4)
This equation is for constant temperatures and heat transfer coefficients. In most heat
exchangers this is not the case and so a different form of the equation is used
(5)
where is the total heat load, U is the mean overall heat transfer coefficient and ΔT M the
mean temperature difference. The calculation of ΔTM and the removal of the constant heat
transfer coefficient assumption is described in Mean Temperature Difference.
Calculation of U and ΔTM requires information on the exchanger type, the geometry (e.g., the
size of the passages in a plate or the diameter of a tube), flow orientation, pure countercurrent
flow or crossflow, etc. The total duty can then be calculated using an assumed value of
AT and compared with the required duty. Changes to the assumed geometry can then be
made and U, ΔTM and recalculated to eventually iterate to a solution where is equal to
the required duty. However, in performing the thermal analysis a check should also be made
at each iteration that the allowable pressure drop is not exceeded. Computer programs such as
TASC from HTFS (Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow Service) perform these calculations
automatically and optimize the design.
Mechanical Considerations
All heat exchangers types have to undergo some form of mechanical design. Any exchanger
that operates at above atmospheric pressure should be designed according to the locally
specified pressure vessel design code such as ASME VIII (American Society of Mechanical
Engineers) or BS 5500 (British Standard). These codes specify the requirements for a
pressure vessel, but they do not deal with any specific features of a particular heat exchanger
type. In some cases specialist standards exist for certain types of heat exchanger. Two of
these are listed below, but in general individual manufacturers define their own standards.
The figure above represents a typical shell tube conjugate heat exchanger analysis. The
incoming high temperature fluid passes through an array of tubes, which carry cooling fluid.
The energy balance on the tube surface, which eventually determines the surface temperature
and heat flux, indicates the effectiveness of the tube location, size, cooling flow rate, and the
overall cooling scheme. The resultant wall heat transfer characteristic can easily provide an
engineering assessment of the overall success of the heat exchanger.
Figure 10 Conjugate Heat Transfer for Heat Exchanger Designs
For example, the conjugate heat transfer analysis shown above is used to assess the overall
cooling efficiency of the heat exchanger design. In this case, the cooling tubes are aligned in
a straight line from bottom to top. The incoming high temperature fluid enters from the
bottom of the domain. The flowfield solution for the heat exchanger analysis shows that the
wake of the first cooling tube spreads over the remaining tube regions, resulting in greatly
diminished cooling efficiency for the downstream tubes. A redesign can be achieved based on
the information provided by the conjugate heat transfer analysis.
References