Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

ROL Eclampsia

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

HISTORICAL ASPECTS4

The disease “eclampsia” is known since the birth of modern medicine

and even before that. The syndrome of pre-eclamptic toxemia is known for the

last 200 years. Still, the disease continues to haunt the obstetrician with

considerable severity.

Oldest source for eclampsia literature starts from 22,00 BC, when Kahun

Papyrus mentioned - the use of a wooden stick to prevent the mother from

biting her tongue on the day of delivery.

Indian Atharvaveda and Sushrutha Samhita of old but unknown dates

mention eclampsia. Atharvaveda described an amulet, to be worn by the

mother at her 8th month of pregnancy for warding off convulsions during child

birth.

In Sushrutha Samhita, it has been mentioned that, `the child moving in

the womb of a dead mother, who had just expired from convulsions, should be

delivered by cutting open the abdomen’.

Hippocrates, in his aphorisms section VI, No.39, wrote convulsion take

place either from repletion or depletion. He noted that headaches, convulsions

and drowsiness represented omnious signs in postpartum period.

Rossilin (1513) listed unconsciousness with convulsions is the omnious

sign of eclampsia.

Gaebel Khouren (1596) stated that pregnant uterus causes convulsions

particularly if it contains a malformed fetus.


According to Dentar and co-workers, the word `eclampsia’ first

appeared in the treatise on gynaecology by varandeous in 1619.

Pan (1664) mentioned generalised clonic spasms in pregnancy.

Mauriceau (1668) stated that the danger to the mother and fetus is more,

if the mother doesnot recover consciousness between convulsions. He

recognised that primigravidas are more at risk of convulsion than multigravidas

and the disease can be treated by prompt delivery.

In 1722, Deltamohe recognised that early delivery in these patients

facilitated their recovery.

In 1768, Denman said that disease seldom or never occured in towns

where people lived luxuriously. He described medical management versus

termination of pregnancy.

In 1778, Levergel suggested early induction of labor and even caesarean

section at one time as immediate means for the patient recovery. The prime

object of a phlebotomy was to reduce cerebral congestion, which was thought

as a cause of convulsion.

Demanet (1797) was the first to relate convulsions with oedema. Rayer

(1840) found protein in the urine of these pregnant oedematous patients.

Brights description of acute nephritis in 1827 made kidney disease

fashionable. Since oedema and albuminuria were characteristic features of both

eclampsia and nephritis, eclampsia was thought to be renal disorder and

convulsions were attributed to ureamia. When this was disproved, new theories

proliferated. Some authors hypothesised that eclampsia was due to compression of ureters, others to a
summation of external irritants and a few

returned to the idea that it was simply epilepsy.

Credited with the discovery of proteinuria in eclampsia, Lever (1843)

observed that proteinuria disappeared following delivery and therefore

eclampsia is not due to nephritis. Lever also observed that eclampsia was more

common in first pregnancies than subsequent ones.


In 1884, Delore was certain that the cause was a specific bacterium

which he named bacillus eclampsiae, until to his dismay, it was identified as a

common organism Proteus vulgaris. Then the idea took hold that the disorder

was due to the existence of specific toxins of pregnancy which were produced

in the placenta ( Ahlfeld, 1894) and thus it came to be called toxemia.

In 1905, J.B. Delee of Chicago read every thing on toxaemia he could

lay his hands on, and concluded with a touch of exasperation “you all know the

trite expression of zwiefel, that eclampsia is a disease of theories, that I have

had more and more proved to me as I waded through the oceans of literature..

As a matter of fact we know practically nothing of the causation of eclampsia.

A theory has only to be set up by one investigator to be knocked down by

another.... only one point seems to be generally considered, that eclampsia is

due to the action of a toxin in blood upon the nerve centres”.

When cause of a disease is obscure, rational treatment is difficult and

there is often a multiplicity of remedies. So, was it with toxaemia.

Stronganoff and Tweedy believed in sedation to control the convulsions

and in complete non-interference with pregnancy. Tweedy advocated in

addition, elimination of toxin by stomach wash, purge and bowel wash. In

1919 Tweedy reported maternal mortality of 8.1%.

Titus and Givens (1992), are credited with introduction of I.V. glucose

solutions.

MgSO4 was used as purgative both orally or rectally since 1700. In

1906, Horn first reported parentral use of MgSO4 which was given

intrathecally.

In 1954, Taylor, Tillman and Blanchard compared the rates of still birth

week by week, with the rates of neonatal death to be expected if the infants had

been delivered in each given week. Taylor concluded that the degree of

proteinuria is more critical than the level of blood pressure in determining the

fetal death.
In 1968 Lean, Ratnam and Sivasamban reported perinatal mortality of

11% with immediate caesarean section and prompt induction of labor. The

primary reliance was on quick delivery.

By late 1920’s the Slogan in the treatment of eclampsia became, `treat

the eclampsia medically and ignore the pregnancy’ since then almost every

drug having a sedative, anti- hypertensive or a diuretic effect has been

introduced in the management of eclampsia.

You might also like