Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 29 views

    Form 303 Panelist Evaluation Form Thesis 2 Proposal

    Uploaded by

    John Mark Candare
    This document is an evaluation form for proposal defenses at the Cavite State University-Naic campus in the Philippines. It contains sections to rate different aspects of a capstone or thesis project on documentation, methodology, and presentation. Evaluators are asked to assign numeric ratings between 1-30% for the correctness and completeness of the documentation, 1-10% for diagrams and figures, and 1-10% for citations. Methodology is rated 30% and includes aspects like the development life cycle, research design, and data analysis. Presentation is rated 20% based on clarity, visual aids, answering questions, and convincing the panelists.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Form 303 Panelist Evaluation Form Thesis 2 Proposal

    Uploaded by

    John Mark Candare
    29 views1 page
    This document is an evaluation form for proposal defenses at the Cavite State University-Naic campus in the Philippines. It contains sections to rate different aspects of a capstone or thesis project on documentation, methodology, and presentation. Evaluators are asked to assign numeric ratings between 1-30% for the correctness and completeness of the documentation, 1-10% for diagrams and figures, and 1-10% for citations. Methodology is rated 30% and includes aspects like the development life cycle, research design, and data analysis. Presentation is rated 20% based on clarity, visual aids, answering questions, and convincing the panelists.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an evaluation form for proposal defenses at the Cavite State University-Naic campus in the Philippines. It contains sections to rate different aspects of a capstone or thesis project on documentation, methodology, and presentation. Evaluators are asked to assign numeric ratings between 1-30% for the correctness and completeness of the documentation, 1-10% for diagrams and figures, and 1-10% for citations. Methodology is rated 30% and includes aspects like the development life cycle, research design, and data analysis. Presentation is rated 20% based on clarity, visual aids, answering questions, and convincing the panelists.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    29 views1 page

    Form 303 Panelist Evaluation Form Thesis 2 Proposal

    Uploaded by

    John Mark Candare
    This document is an evaluation form for proposal defenses at the Cavite State University-Naic campus in the Philippines. It contains sections to rate different aspects of a capstone or thesis project on documentation, methodology, and presentation. Evaluators are asked to assign numeric ratings between 1-30% for the correctness and completeness of the documentation, 1-10% for diagrams and figures, and 1-10% for citations. Methodology is rated 30% and includes aspects like the development life cycle, research design, and data analysis. Presentation is rated 20% based on clarity, visual aids, answering questions, and convincing the panelists.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    Republic of the Philippines

    CAVITE STATE UNIVERSITY-NAIC


    Formerly Cavite College of Fisheries
    Bucana, Naic, Cavite
    ' (046) 856-0401/ 856-0943/  (046)856-0942
    info@cvsu-naic.edu.ph.com

    PROPOSAL DEFENSE EVALUATION FORM


    (Undergraduate Thesis for BSIT and BSCS)
    CAPSTONE/THESIS TITLE

    GROUP MEMBERS

    DATE OF DEFENSE TIME SCHOOL CAMPUS


    Cavite State University – Naic Campus
    NAME OF EVALUATOR SEX: ___ Male: SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR
    __ Female
    ROLE: ___ Thesis Adviser ___ Technical Critic ___ RDES ___ ITD Faculty
    ___ Client/User(Please specify Position/User Type: ____________ ) ___ Others (Specify: ____________ )

    INSTRUCTIONS TO THE EVALUATOR


    Place a numeric rating at the appropriate box based from the provided range of rating (min-max score).
    Rating Rating
    I. DOCUMENT (50%) Range (%) Score
    1. Correctness of the manuscript content which include the 1 - 30
    introduction, review of related literatures, methodology, results and
    conclusions
    2. Availability and correctness of relevant diagrams and other necessary 1 - 10
    figures
    3. Presence of citations for non-original material and sufficiency of other 1 - 10
    supporting documents such as interview and survey results
    II. METHODOLOGY (30%)
    4. Definition and application of the selected software development 1 - 10
    life cycle and other methodology
    5. Appropriateness of research design, data gathering, statistical 1 - 10
    treatment of data and other analysis tools utilized
    6. Adequacy of data gathered for the study 1 - 10
    III. PRESENTATION (20%)
    7. Clarity and organization of presentation delivery 1–5

    8. Adequacy of visual aids and other tools used for the presentation 1–5

    9. Ability to answer questions analytically and convincingly 1–5

    10. Ability to convince the panelists of the ideas being presented 1-5

    TOTAL

    You might also like