Question Paper
Question Paper
Question Paper
Instructions:
Q. No 1. Read the following passage and answer the questions at the end: - (10)
Long ago Emerson wrote.” A man’s task is his life preserver.” This seems to be remarkably correct in our
modern life. The man without a task is like a ship without ballast and anchor; he is all too often merely a
drifter. Very few men seem to have initiative enough to choose a task for themselves if they do not need to
work. When the inevitable disappointments come, as they assuredly will, they are completely overwhelmed.
But the man who has his task has no time for vain regrets; he escapes the disastrous fate which over takes
his less fortunate brothers. Work is one of the greatest safety-valves which was ever invented, and the
youths especially need it.
We sometimes pity the man who is a slave to his task, and perhaps we are right; but a man who has no task
is a slave to his ennui, which is very much worse. Even a disagreeable task is better than none; the man who
does work which is disagreeable to him will yet live more happily, than if he had had no task at all.
And the man with the task is easier to live with, and will prove a more contented citizen, and a more
valuable one, than the one who lacks such a task. Even so-called invalids are often the better for some task
which is suited to their powers, and they often live all the longer if they work hard. The man who starts life
with a solid task which taxes his powers had better thank God, and do his best, for this is one of humanity’s
greatest boons.
Questions:
1- What disadvantages will a man without a task suffer? (2.5)
3- Elaborate using your own examples that in what ways is a man with some task the better for it? (5)
Q. No 2. Write a précis of the following passage in about 120 words and also suggest a
suitable title: - (05)
I think modern educational theorists are inclined to attach too much importance to the negative virtue of not
interfering with children, and too little to the positive merit of enjoying their company. If you have the sort
of liking for children that many people have for horses or dogs, they will be apt to respond to your
suggestions, and to accept prohibitions, perhaps with some good-humoured grumbling, but without
resentment. It is no use to have the sort of liking that consists in regarding them as a field for valuable social
endeavour, or what amounts to the same thing as an outlet for power-impulses. No child will be grateful for
an interest in him that springs from the thought that he will have a vote to be secured for your party or a
body to be sacrificed to king and country. The desirable sort of interest is that which consists in spontaneous
pleasure in the presence of children, without any ulterior purpose. Teachers who have this quality will
seldom need to interfere with children's freedom, but will be able to do so, when necessary, without causing
psychological damage.
Unfortunately, it is utterly impossible for over-worked teachers to preserve an instinctive liking for
children; they are bound to come to feel towards them as the proverbial confectioner's apprentice does
towards macaroons. I do not think that education ought to be anyone's whole profession: it should be
undertaken for at most two hours a day by people whose remaining hours are spent away from children. The
society of the young is fatiguing, especially when strict discipline is avoided. Fatigue, in the end, produces
irritation, which is likely to express itself somehow, whatever theories the harassed teacher may have taught
himself or herself to believe. The necessary friendliness cannot be preserved by self-control alone. But
where it exists, it should be unnecessary to have rules in advance as to how "naughty" children are to be
treated, since impulse is likely to lead to the right decision, and almost any decision will be right if the child
feels that you like him. No rules, however wise, are a substitute for affection and tact. - (359 Words).