1) The document discusses the rules around negligence, fraud, and fortuitous events in obligations under Philippine law. It defines the different types of negligence (contractual, civil, criminal) and states that waiver of future fraud is void.
2) It also discusses the diligence required in obligations, noting the level depends on the nature of the obligation, circumstances of the parties, time, and place. In cases of fraud or bad faith, the obligor is liable for all damages.
3) The document defines fortuitous events as events that could not be foreseen or avoided. It establishes the requisites for a fortuitous event to exempt an obligor from liability, such as the event being
1) The document discusses the rules around negligence, fraud, and fortuitous events in obligations under Philippine law. It defines the different types of negligence (contractual, civil, criminal) and states that waiver of future fraud is void.
2) It also discusses the diligence required in obligations, noting the level depends on the nature of the obligation, circumstances of the parties, time, and place. In cases of fraud or bad faith, the obligor is liable for all damages.
3) The document defines fortuitous events as events that could not be foreseen or avoided. It establishes the requisites for a fortuitous event to exempt an obligor from liability, such as the event being
1) The document discusses the rules around negligence, fraud, and fortuitous events in obligations under Philippine law. It defines the different types of negligence (contractual, civil, criminal) and states that waiver of future fraud is void.
2) It also discusses the diligence required in obligations, noting the level depends on the nature of the obligation, circumstances of the parties, time, and place. In cases of fraud or bad faith, the obligor is liable for all damages.
3) The document defines fortuitous events as events that could not be foreseen or avoided. It establishes the requisites for a fortuitous event to exempt an obligor from liability, such as the event being
1) The document discusses the rules around negligence, fraud, and fortuitous events in obligations under Philippine law. It defines the different types of negligence (contractual, civil, criminal) and states that waiver of future fraud is void.
2) It also discusses the diligence required in obligations, noting the level depends on the nature of the obligation, circumstances of the parties, time, and place. In cases of fraud or bad faith, the obligor is liable for all damages.
3) The document defines fortuitous events as events that could not be foreseen or avoided. It establishes the requisites for a fortuitous event to exempt an obligor from liability, such as the event being
Art. 1171 Responsibility arising from equivalent to fraud. Waiver is void. fraud is demandable in all obligations. Kinds of negligence accdg to source of Any waiver of an action for future obligation fraud is void. (1102a) (1) Contractual negligence (culpa refers to incidental fraud w/c is employed in contractual) – negligence in contracts the fulfillment of an obligation. resulting in their breach. Negligence is not a Incidental fraud – fraud at the time of the source of obligation but rather the contract performance of the obligation that was entered bet the parties. Responsibility is demandable in all (2) Civil negligence (culpa aquiliana) – obligations arising from fraud, you can negligence itself is the source of the demand for payment for damages. If the obligation. Also called “tort or quasi-delict”. basis for damages is fraud, the court is not (3) Criminal negligence (culpa criminal) – given the power to mitigate or reduce the negligence resulting in the commission of a damages because in fraud there is bad faith crime. The negligent act causing damages unlike negligence. may produce civil liability or create an action Waiver – renunciation of right for quasi-delict. Waiver of an action for future fraud is Ex. Driver of a taxi. (Reckless imprudence – void. It encourages commission of fraud. To criminal act) commit acts of bad faith. You can have all three as basis if they are Waiver of action for past fraud is valid. connected in the same act but you can claim Because it already happened, considered as only once. Under Art. 2177 of Civil code, it is an act of generosity. Renounced: the effect of prohibited to recover twice for the same the fraud, the right to indemnity of the party negligent act. entitled. When the plaintiff’s own negligence was the Note: Waiver should be voluntarily signed to immediate and proximate cause of his injury, be valid. The signee should understand what he cannot recover damages. If his negligence he/she enters into. is contributory, the immediate and proximate Art. 1172 Responsibility arising from cause of the injury being the defendant’s negligence in the performance of lack of due care, the plaintiff may recover every kind on obligation is also damages but the court shall mitigate the demandable, but such liability may be damages to be awarded. regulated by the courts, according to **To be entitled to damages, it is not the circumstance. required that the negligence of the Unlike fraud, if there is negligence, the court defendant should be the sole cause of the may reduce the damages depending upon damage. the circumstances of each case because Art. 1173 The fault or negligence of there is no bad faith, no intent to commit this the obligor consists in the omission of act. that diligence w/c is req’d by the Negligence is not as serious as fraud nature of the obligation and because there is no deliberate intention to corresponds w/ the circumstances of cause injury or damages. the person, of the time and of the Past negligence, can be subject to waiver. place. When negligence shows bad An action for future negligence may be faith, the provisions of arts. 1171 and renounced, as long as it is not considered 2201, par 2, shall apply. fraud, reckless that would cause damage to If the law or contract does not state other person, not covered by those requiring the diligence w/c is to be observed in extraordinary diligence, may be subject to the performance, that w/c is expected of a good father of a family shall be req’d. Fortuitous event – event cannot be foreseen, Fault or negligence – the failure to observe or which though foreseen, is inevitable. for the protection of the interests of another, Impossible to foresee or impossible to avoid. that degree of care, precaution and vigilance Essence: consists of being a happening whereby other person suffers injury. independent of the will of the debtor and w/c Factors makes the normal fulfillment of the (1) Nature of obligation obligation. (2) Circumstances of the person Fortuitous event – Act of man (murder, (3) Circumstance of time war, fire…) (4) Circumstances of place Force majeure – act of God (earthquake, In contracts and quasi-contracts, the dames calamities…) for w/c the obligor who acted in good faith is Under oblicon, they are identical. Both are liable shall be those that are the natural and independent of the will of the obligor. probable consequences of the breach and Kinds of Fortuitous events w/c the parties have foreseen or could have (1) ordinary fortuitous event – common, reasonably foreseen at the time the could reasonably foresee (rain, floods obligation was constituted. in davao) In case of fraud, bad faith, malice or wanton (2) extra-ordinary fortuitous event – attitude, the obligor shall be responsible for uncommon, could not have possibly all damages w/c may be reasonably foreseen (earthquake, war, pestilence) attributed to the non-performance of the Requisites: obligation. (1) event must be independent of the Ex. B suffered a heart attack and was human will or at least of the debtor’s hospitalized for 5 days because of the breach will by S resulting to loss of 5000 profit and this (2) event could not be foreseen and if angered the former. If S acted in good faith, foreseen, inevitable the damage w/c B ought to receive should be (3) event must of such a character as to the amount of 5000, the profit w/c B failed to render it impossible for the debtor to realize. comply w/ in a normal manner If S acted in bad faith, he is also liable to pay (4) the debtor must be from any for the hospitalization expenses w/c clearly participation in the aggravation or originated from the breach. injury to the creditor, no negligence in Kinds of Diligence (hierarchy) the part of the debtor. (1) Agreement In the absence of any requisites would (2) in the absence of agreement, required prevent the obligor from being exempt from by law in the particular case liability. (3) in the absence of agreement and law, Mere pecuniary inability or poverty, is not an the diligence of a good father of a excuse for non-fulfillment of the obligation. family Neither is mere difficulty to foresee an event; Art. 1174 Except in cases expressly it is different from the impossibility to specified by the law, or when it is foresee. The event must be unforeseeable or otherwise declared by stipulation, or if foreseen, must be impossible to avoid. when the nature of the obligation General rule: A person is not responsible for requires the assumption of risk, no loss or damage caused to another resulting person shall be responsible for those from fortuitous event, his obligation is events w/c could not be foreseen, or extinguished. w/c though foreseen, were inevitable. Exceptions: (1) when expressly defined by law. (a) When there is fraud, negligence or (3) When the nature of the obligation contravention of the tenor (1170, requires the assumption of risk 1165) Risk of loss or damage is an essential (b) The debtor has promised to deliver element the same specific thing to 2 or more Art. 1175 Usurious transactions shall persons who don’t have the same be governed by special laws. interest Simple loan/mutuum – contract where one of (c) The obligation to deliver a specific the parties delivers to another upon the thing arises from a crime condition that the same amt of the same (d) The thing to be delivered is generic kind and quality shall be paid. (2) When declared by stipulation Usury - The intention to make the debtor liable even in case of fortuitous event must be clearly expressed