Good Story Company Submission Cheat Sheet
Good Story Company Submission Cheat Sheet
Good Story Company Submission Cheat Sheet
Submission
(Try to be more specific than “get
published”)
Cheat Sheet
2. Who is the audience you’re envisioning for
this project? (Try to be more specific than
“everyone”)
3. Is your project more “mass market”
CHECKLIST
(imagine a pulp paperback) or an artisanal
project (imagine a literary chapbook or
This cheat sheet contains all of the information
beautiful coffee table object)?
you’ll need to gear up for submission, do
4. How much help and guidance do you want
amazing research, and pitch your project in
from a potential agent or publisher? Do
the strongest way possible.
you want to communicate often or are you
more hands-off?
❏ Get Clarity on Your Goals
5. How much control and input do you want
❏ Decide on the Publisher vs. Agent Approach
during the publication process?
❏ Do Your Submission Research
6. What size of agency or publisher feels
❏ Get Your Assets in Order
“right” to you? (Imagine a large
❏ Work on Your Logline and Hook
corporation with many clients vs. a cozy
❏ Write Your Query
boutique with smaller lists)
❏ Write Your Synopsis
7. What kind of relationship do you envision
❏ Write Your Proposal (if relevant)
with your agent or publisher? (Imagine a
❏ Submit!
lifelong partnership or a quick, sales-
❏ Analyze
based transaction)
❏ Regroup and Decide Next Steps
8. What kind of list do you envision yourself
on? Do you care about other writers or
GOALS QUESTIONNAIRE names at that agency or house?
9. How many projects do you have in you as a
Take a look at the questionnaire on the right to writer?
get clarity on your writing and publishing 10. How important is money? How important
goals. are subrights (movie, merchandising, etc.)?
Choosing to submit to a literary agent seems to be the starting place for a lot of today’s
writers. There are pros and some cons to working with an agent. Choosing to submit
directly to a publisher is the choice some other writers make. There are pros and some
cons to working with a publisher without a middleman. Use this checklist to decide which
approach is right for you!
Agent Pros
Agents are your way into publishers closed to unsolicited submission, like the bigger
players (HarperCollins, Penguin Random House, etc.). There aren’t many loopholes
to get you seen there otherwise.
Agented submissions go to the top of the pile. Even houses that accept unagented
submissions will receive projects from agents—and read them first.
Contract negotiations are off your plate. You’ll have an expert in your corner,
fighting for your interests.
The agency will have precedent-filled boilerplates with each publisher, and use the
clout of their big clients to work for you when it comes to clauses, royalty figures,
etc.
Agents act as buffers between you and your house if problems arise.
Most agents will help you revise projects and advise you on career questions and
your overall trajectory.
Agents are connected to foreign publishers and movie agents, so their connections
will help your project get more opportunities worldwide and in film.
Agent Cons
Agents charge for their services, 15% is standard for domestic sales, and 20-25% is
standard for subrights and foreign sales. They take a commission from each royalty
check, too.
Publisher Pros
In approaching a publisher directly, you cut out the middleman and can have more
control over the process of submission. This means the onus of research is on your
shoulders, but if you thrive in that environment, you won’t have an agent telling you
what to do and how to pitch your project.
You can potentially cultivate a strong relationship with a publisher and editor,
without a third party. Some wonderful partnerships have resulted.
You can feel freer to bring your ideas to a publisher without worrying about an
agent’s feedback or submission timeframe. Agents often juggle other clients and so
they are not always responsive.
All the money that’s coming to you is yours alone. You don’t pay a commission to
anyone when you sell directly to a publisher.
Publisher Cons
Many publishers that are considered larger (like the Big Five) will simply not accept
unagented submissions (those pitched without a literary agent).
As a result of the above, you will likely be working with smaller or regional
publishers. If you have a “niche” project that might do really well at a more modest
house, though, this is not a big deal.
1. Write the best possible manuscript you can. Make sure to get it reviewed by
qualified readers, whether a critique group or freelance editor.
2. Get trusted feedback on the project to help make it as strong as possible.
3. Make sure you have a strong sense of its category, and how you will pitch it. Is it
general fiction? Picture book vs. chapter book? Is it a genre? Which one? Make sure
it fits the categories of that genre or category. Is it the right length? Does it employ
some of the conventions of the category (there are many popular tropes in romance,
for example)?
4. Research your possible venues, from agents to publishers (if you want to submit
directly to houses).
5. Narrow down your options in terms of one agent per agency or one imprint per
publisher. Research the person you’re targeting and try to find some personalization
details to use in your submission. (Some publishers or agencies will direct you to a
general submission box, so personalization is not always possible.)
6. Write and assemble submission materials:
a. Query
b. Synopsis
c. Sample Pages
d. Nonfiction Book Proposal (if applicable)
e. Art Portfolio (if applicable)
7. Do comprehensive agent and/or publisher research.
8. Narrow down your final submission list of 10-15 agents and/or publishers. Review
their submission guidelines.
9. Prepare your query and submission materials in a format that’s ready to send.
10. Send away to each recipient according to their submission guidelines.
11. Meanwhile, work on your next project, develop your portfolio, create your online
presence, read writing reference books, take a class, go to a conference, and
otherwise do professional development!
12. Compile your responses. Decide if you have enough new ideas to do a revision and
resubmit. Perhaps you want to try independently publishing, or moving on to a new
project while you decide what to do with your current work.
1. Ideally, your first round of research will result in 20-30 names that are compelling to
you, whether those are publishers or literary agents.
2. From there, you will dive deeper and segment your targets into an A List of 10-15
names, and a B List of 10-15 names. If you find even more people you’d like to pitch,
but are maybe lukewarm about, you can also add a C List.
3. Remember the golden rule: DO NOT pitch more than one editor/imprint at a
publisher and more than one agent at a literary agency at a time.
4. It is perfectly acceptable (and beneficial to the writer) to send all of your submissions
at once. This is called a “multiple submission” or “simultaneous submission”. Just
make sure to mention that you’re doing so somewhere in your query letter.
5. Do not grant exclusivity unless you have a compelling reason to do so. It does not
earn you any additional favor with an agent or publisher. But if someone asks you to
submit exclusively, you can decline, unless...
6. If you are revising for an agent or publisher based on extensive notes, you should
grant them exclusivity (for a specified period, like two to four weeks).
7. Do not contact an agent or editor with a revised manuscript unless you do it ASAP
after sending. Withdraw your project from consideration and send the new version.
Do not do this more than once, or you will look unprofessional.
8. Notify everyone who has responded favorably to your submission (a partial or full
request) if you receive an offer of representation or an offer from a publisher.
Interest from someone doesn’t need to be broadcast elsewhere. If you get a concrete
offer, however, absolutely let everyone else know, and give them time to respond.
9. Most people will consider a manuscript again after they’ve rejected it, but only if
considerable revision has taken place.
10. Follow all submission guidelines for agents and publishers, with, perhaps, the
exception of the “query only” rule. Sometimes it pays to take a risk and send some
sample pages if your opening is amazing. Otherwise, follow everyone’s rules to the
letter as outlined on their websites or in printed notices.
11. SEND NO ATTACHMENTS EVER, unless they are SPECIFICALLY requested.
Here’s a list of websites that will be helpful to writers on the agent and publisher search.
There are some great websites and blogs here, and all are worth a read, whether you’re
actively searching for agents or publishers in any stage of the game.
A great and frequently updated resource that collects wish lists from agents and
publishers. Add this to your research and see if you can catch the right gatekeeper at the
right time with your project. Also check out the #mswl hashtag on Twitter!
AAR: aaronline.org
The Association of Authors’ Representatives is a list of member agencies that have joined
and agree to abide by ethics codes and standards. Andrea Brown was one of the co-
founders of the AAR.
A searchable database of agents where you can use the Advanced Search function to
narrow down the results to an agent’s specific tastes. Want someone who represents
both fantasy and young adult? Check the boxes and see who fits your criteria. There are
other things you can search for, too. Results give you contact information and recent
sales.
Writer’s Digest keeps a blog where they profile agents, introduce new agents to the
writing community, interview writers about their agents and otherwise talk about agents!
You can also check out the Writer’s Market and Children’s Writer’s and Illustrator’s
Market books, updated annually.
This is a pretty similar website to Agent Query (above), but it also lets you organize and
track your query and submission status. What people were once doing with
spreadsheets is now online! There’s also, I think, a community element to this where you
can interact with other writers.
A paid resource ($25/mo) for agent and publisher research. They have lists for picture
book, middle grade, thriller, memoir, etc. I recommend that everyone join it for at least
one month while doing research (you can always cancel at any time). You can see who’s
selling, how much, how often, to which publishers, etc. Agents sound great on paper on
their websites, but I think track record is more telling. Same for publishers. Which ones
are doing deals in your category?
Checklist
ever find yourself stuck for ideas, consider pursuing one of
these projects. Remember to be professional in all of your
dealings, especially online. If you want to be a writer, act like a
HERE ARE SOME
IDEAS FOR writer, and present yourself as a professional. Be sure to let
DEVELOPING everyone know about published pieces and your successes by
YOURSELF AND updating your social media—but be careful. People who only
YOUR ASSETS talk about themselves and their projects online don’t make it
AS A WRITER
very far. Be useful and helpful by sharing news stories and
articles that your readers might find interesting.
Checklist.
This can be a tab on your informational website, or a
standalone
A pitch and logline are related terms for a quick written or verbal summary of your story,
usually communicated in a “hooky” and enticing way. A pitch can sometimes be longer
than a “logline”. Pitches can go on for several sentences, but loglines generally tend to
be single sentences.
Pitch
A standard pitch or logline combines all of the above. Here are two examples:
In a world where aliens rule the planet, the last remaining Earthling must use ancient
powers she just discovered to keep the human race alive.
As Ingrid fights for a woman’s right to vote, she falls in love across the picket lines. How
does she stay true to her cause ... and her heart?
We get a sense of the world, the character, the primary conflict. These are the three
ingredients of a strong pitch. You can embellish this basic formula with more information
if you’re pitching in person. You can also use this as a starting point to develop your
query letter paragraphs. Or leave it short for a logline that can be the beginning of a sit-
down pitch or a query letter.
Meets Comparisons
A popular formula for pitches and loglines is the “meets” comparison. If one doesn’t
Imagine the characters from The Fault in Our Stars stranded in a Lord of the Flies
scenario.
(You’d think this would be a ridiculous premise, but the world does have a book called
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies...)
One note about comparative titles and any properties you use to draw attention to your
own: You do not want to earnestly compare yourself to something that's too popular.
Literary agent eyeballs roll at "It's Harry Potter meets Twilight!" These properties are
simply too big, and making this kind of comparison may communicate that you have
unrealistic expectations of your own work and your potential in the market.
You will notice that I use Twilight as an example for my query letter a bit later in this
resource, but that's exactly because everyone in the world knows the story and I don't
have to explain the finer points—the focus can be the query.
Query formatting confuses a lot of writers but is actually quite simple. Queries have
several moving parts. They are defined here:
Personalization
If you have a personal reason for contacting the agent or publisher, make it specific. For
example, “I’m querying you because you represented my favorite book, Title.” This is
specific and speaks to that agent or publisher’s experience. If you have personal
experience with this person, that’s always relevant here, “I’m querying you because we
met at [Name of Writing Conference] in [Month, Year], and you requested the first ten
pages of my work.” If you have it, use it!
An example of bad personalization would be, “I’m querying you because of your passion
for literature.” This is vague and can be said of anyone working in publishing. Agents and
publishers, of all people, can recognize a form letter. So if this is the best you have to
offer, omit the personalization element. Your best weapon here is strong research to
find connection points with the people you’re querying, if at all possible. The
personalization section is optional.
Comparative Titles
If you find that you have something in common with books or authors already on
shelves, feel free to use comp titles. For more considerations on choosing comps, follow
this link. The comp title section is optional.
Logline
This can use your comps (“It’s Sharknado meets Like Water for Elephants.”) or you can
write a one-or-two sentence pitch at most that summarizes your story. If you are using
personalization and comp titles, you can skip the logline. If you have nothing else for the
opening to your query, you may want to consider a logline. This is just a one-sentence
Manuscript Logistics
This is where you mention the title, category, word count, and anything else relevant to
your manuscript, like any unusual narrative choices. For example, “Title is a 51,000-
word middle grade fantasy manuscript told in second person direct address,” or “Told in
dual narrative POV, Title is a 75,000-word literary novel in verse.” The title, word count,
and category are the bare minimum here.
Biographical Information
All about you. It’s strange when this section is entirely missing, so think of at least one
sentence to include. On the other hand, don’t go overboard with voice, jokes, or
personality. Don’t make your bio longer than the query meat. Include only professional-
sounding and relevant details. If you have writing credits, publications, or contest wins,
Query Logistics
This is your breezy sign-off to the query itself. It can literally be: “Per your guidelines,
the first XYZ (pages or chapters) are enclosed below. Please note that this is a
simultaneous submission. Thank you very much for your time and consideration.”
Simultaneous submissions (sending to more than one person at a time) are considered
industry standard, but they’re still worth mentioning.
These are the basic query elements. You can rearrange them a bit, as you'll see. But for
the most part, this is how they appear in all queries. A few are optional. The more you
can include (and the more correct and relevant it is) the better. But keep in mind that
most queries are going to be 200-400 words. Just because you cover a lot of information
doesn’t mean your query has to be long.
Three perfectly valid versions of how you might want to organize your query letter:
Example Query 1:
Paragraph 1: Personalization
Paragraph 2: Comps, Logline, Manuscript Logistics
Paragraphs 3-5: Query Meat
Paragraph 6: Bio Info
Paragraph 7: Query Logistics
Name and Contact Info
Example Query 2:
Example Query 3:
Whether you pitch an agent in person or with a written query, your goal is the same: to
get us to request your manuscript. When you pitch in person or write a query, make sure
to answer these questions about your manuscript:
Answer these questions about your own manuscript. Read the backs of published books
and the jacket flap copy. This is roughly the length and tone you’re going for with a
verbal pitch or the meat of your written query letter. The most well-crafted queries, in
my opinion, are ones that make me care about the story and characters. They make me
feel something. They make me want to know what happens next. For more on this, click
here.
Agents and editors want to hear from writers. They want good projects. They simply
can’t do their jobs without them. So present the juiciest, most compelling points of your
story, mention the important details outlined above, and, finally, have fun and be
yourself!
Many writers hate creating a synopsis—and for good reason. They tend to be dry,
daunting documents that are full of facts. As writers, we always want to add voice to our
work. This is nearly impossible in a synopsis.
Here’s the dirty synopsis secret: If you hated writing it, they’ll probably hate reading it
just as much.
You’ll notice that some agents don’t even request a synopsis. This is good news. The
pressure is off! Just do your best to convey the flow of your story, and you likely won’t
be evaluated too harshly on this document alone.
1. The synopsis should be either one or two pages long, double-spaced. I’d suggest
doing an exercise and writing two versions, one short, and one longer.
2. Your synopsis should contain a chronological retelling of your plot. That’s it and
that’s all.
3. If there are big deal character developments, be sure to mention those as they
dovetail with the plot.
4. Yes, you do need to reveal any plot twists or surprise endings. Agents and publishers
will want to see the full scope of your plot.
5. The tone of the synopsis should be very matter-of-fact. This is NOT a document
where you should pitch or tease or withhold information.
6. If you find yourself with an overlong synopsis, think of all the things you could delete
that, if missing, wouldn’t impact the reader’s understanding of the story.
7. Clarity is key, above all else. The synopsis should present information, instead of
raising questions or introducing confusion.
8. Give your synopsis to a friend or critique partner. Then ask your reader to tell you
the gist of your story. If they seem totally confused, it’s time to take a second look at
your document.
Now knock it out, worry a bit less, and you’ll be on your way! You can learn more here.
If you’re writing a book proposal for a nonfiction project, I highly recommend checking
out How to Write a Book Proposal by Jody Rein and Michael Larsen and The Weekend
Book Proposal by Ryan Van Cleave. It goes into a lot of detail about the exact
components and organizational flow of such a project. For your book proposal, you will
primarily be covering:
Be prepared to include two or three sample chapters of your book with the proposal.
These chapters should represent the overall style of the book and if there’s a big chapter
that really focuses on the unique idea or message that you’re writing about, try to
include it. Don’t just write a few introductory chapters—really give agents and publishers
some of your main substance to consider.
an Agent or
They’re interested in your attitude toward this project, as well
as how you might handle marketing and future projects. This list
Publisher comes from this blog post. Here is a sampling of what to expect:
Might Ask 1. More about you and your background. They want to know
you personally and get a sense of how easy or difficult you
to Ask an
how they’d work with you to make your dream a reality. This list
comes from this blog post. Here are some questions you can
Agent or ask:
It may surprise you to know that there are different levels of rejection. Each type of
rejection means something different. This list is adapted from this blog post:
Form Rejection: You are rejected but don’t receive any feedback or thoughts.
Gatekeepers will sometimes personalize with your name and the name of your
project but don’t say anything specific about it. This is usually what people send
when the writing isn’t solid enough, the voice doesn’t grab them, the idea doesn’t
resonate, etc. You get one of these if your work is obviously not a fit, or obviously
not polished enough, which most readers can tell almost immediately. Watch out,
sometimes rejections that SOUND personal are actually still form verbiage. For
example, “The writing didn’t resonate with me as much as I wanted.” You think
they’re talking about you, but they probably send this same message 30 times a day.
It isn’t malicious, they simply don’t have time to go into detail with every submission.
Personal Rejection: The gatekeeper will still pass on the submission but provide
general feedback. They will use this one either for a query that they thought had
promise or an easily articulated flaw or sometimes for a full manuscript that falls
short of what they were hoping for. Maybe the project shows potential but isn’t right
for their list—which isn’t something the writer can help. Or maybe the agent or
publisher will have thoughts on how it could be improved before they’d consider
representing it — which the writer can take into account if they wish. These
rejections are a bit more specific but don’t give detailed editorial notes, however.
This type rejection is reserved for a project that shows promise but might be still a
little too much work to get into. If you’re getting a lot of these, that means you have
some definite strengths, but there may be big problems with the writing, plot,
character, or overall premise. Sometimes these are the most frustrating rejections
because they aren’t detailed enough to guide you during a revision.
Revise and Resubmit: This is only for cases where the agent or publisher has read the
full manuscript, or maybe a longer partial. In this situation, they’ve spent some time
with the project and will give you specific notes for revision. If you revise, the agent
or editor would love to see it again. They will often ask to consider the project
exclusively.
The dust has settled from your submission round and you have aggregated your
feedback, checked your submission lists, and considered your options. It's important to
note that each writer, each submission, and each manuscript will have its own life.
Finally, help is always an option. I'm happy to bring my experience as a literary agent to
bear and personally do a Query and Synopsis Edit or get on the phone for a consultation.
Sometimes, truly customized advice will get you further than your DIY efforts, and I'd be
thrilled to work with you.
SOCIAL
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
EMAIL
support@goodstorycompany.com