BRM 203 - Block-1
BRM 203 - Block-1
BRM 203 - Block-1
LESSON Introduction to
Indian Economy
1
INTRODUCTION TO INDIAN ECONOMY
CONTENTS
1.0 Aims and Objectives
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Definition of Economics
1.3 Salient Features of Indian Economy
1.4 Difference between Growth and Development
1.4.1 Growth
1.4.2 Development
1.5 Measurement of Economic Growth
1.6 Factors affecting Economic Growth of India
1.7 Classification of Sectors of Indian Economy
1.7.1 Major Sectors of Indian Economy
1.8 The Economic Scenario at Glance
1.9 Marketing’s Role in Indian economy
1.10 Impact of Globalisation on Indian economy
1.10.1 Steps taken to Globalise Indian Economy
1.10.2 Merits and Demerits of Globalisation
1.11 SWOT Analysis of Indian Economy
1.11.1 Strength
1.11.2 Weaknesses
1.11.3 Opportunities
1.11.4 Threats
1.12 Policy Framework of Retail in India
1.13 Problems facing Indian Economy
1.14 Challenges towards Indian Economy
1.14.1 Food, Inflation and Agriculture
1.14.2 Financial Sector Liberalisation
1.14.3 External Sector
1.15 Let Us Sum Up
1.16 Lesson End Activity
1.17 Keywords
1.18 Questions for Discussion
1.19 Suggested Readings
8
. 1.0 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
After studying this lesson, you should be able to:
z Define the term economics and discuss the salient features of Indian economy
z Difference between growth and development
z Measure economic growth
z Identify various factors affecting economic growth of India
z Classify different sectors of Indian economy
z Discuss impact of globalisation on Indian economy
z Explain swot analysis of Indian economy
z Describe policy framework of retail in India
z Identify problems and challenges being face Indian economy
1.1 INTRODUCTION
India is today one of the six fastest growing economies of the world. The country
ranked fourth in terms of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) in 2001. The business and
regulatory environment is evolving and moving towards constant improvement. A
highly talented, skilled and English-speaking human resource base forms its
backbone. The Indian economy has transformed into a vibrant, rapidly growing
consumer market, comprising over 300 million strong middle class with increasing
purchasing power. India provides a large market for consumer goods on the one hand
and imports capital goods and technology to modernise its manufacturing base on the
other.
An abundant and diversified natural resource base, sound economic, industrial and
market fundamentals and highly skilled and talented human resources, make India a
destination for business and investment opportunities with an assured potential for
attractive returns. Far-reaching measures introduced by the government over the past
few years to liberalize the Indian market and integrate it with the global economy are
widely acknowledged.
1.4.1 Growth
1. Growth is used in purely physical terms; it generally refers to change in size,
length, height and weight of an individual. Changes in the quantitative aspects
come into the domain of growth.
2. Growth is one of the aspects of developmental process.
3. Growth describes the changes which takes place in particular aspect of the body
and behaviour of an organism.
4. Growth does not continue throughout life, it stops when maturity has been
attained.
5. The changes produced by growth on the subject of measurement. They may be
quantified.
6. Growth may or may not bring development. A child may grow (in terms of
weight) by becoming fat but his growth may not bring any functional
improvement (qualitative change) or development.
1.4.2 Development
1. Development implies overall changes in shape, form or structure resulting in
improved working or functioning. It indicates the changes in the quality or
character rather than in quantitative aspects.
2. Development is a wider and comprehensive term; it refers to overall changes in
the individual. Growth is one of its aspects.
3. Development describes the changes in the organism as a whole and does not list
changes in parts.
4. Development is a continuous process.
5. Development implies improvement in functioning and behaviour and hence brings
qualitative changes.
6. Development is also possible without growth as we see in the cases of some
children that they do not gain in terms of height, weight or size but they do
experience functional improvement or development in Physical, Social, emotional
or intellectual aspects.
Primary Sector
When the economic activity depends mainly on exploitation of natural resources then
that activity comes under the primary sector. Agriculture and agriculture related
activities are the primary sectors of economy.
Secondary Sector
When the main activity involves manufacturing then it is the secondary sector. All
industrial production where physical goods are produced come under the secondary
sector.
Tertiary Sector
When the activity involves providing intangible goods like services then this is part of
the tertiary sector. Financial services, management consultancy, telephony and IT are
good examples of service sector.
Historical change in the sectors: three stages
1. Initial Stage: After observing the changes that have come in the development
patterns of the sectors, it has been found that in the Initial stages of the
development the Primary Sector was the most important sector of economic
activity.
As the methods of farming changed and agricultural sector began to prosper, it
produced much more food than before and many people could take-up many other
activities which led to the increase in number of activities. However at this stage
most of the goods produced were natural products from the primary sector, hence
most people were employed in this sector.
2. Second Stage: Over a long time (more than hundred years or so) because new
methods of manufacturing were introduced, factories came up and started
expanding. People began to work in factories in large numbers, and also people
started using factory goods in large numbers as they were cheap. Secondary sector
gradually became the most important in total production and employment. There
was a shift and the importance of the sectors also changed.
3. Third Stage: In past hundred, there has been a further shift from Secondary to 15
Introduction to
Tertiary sector in the developed countries. The service sector has become the most Indian Economy
important in terms of total production. Most of working people are also employed
in the service sector.
1.11.1 Strength
The strength of the Indian economy lies in its robust nature, which is evident from its
constant growth even during times of recession (2008-09). The banking and credit
system has been able to survive the downturn due to heavy regulations imposed by the
RBI. This brought more transparency to the system. Another important factor that
forms the spine of the Indian economy is agriculture, because it employs nearly 50%
of the total population. Although agriculture shares only 18.5% of GDP, it makes
India self-reliant in terms of food supply. Today, India is a leading producer of a
number of agricultural products that give a boost to the export value. The youth of
India, which makes a large part of the population is an advantage as it constitutes a
huge work force. Following are its strength:
z Huge pool of labour force
z High percentage of cultivable land
z Diversified nature of the economy
z Huge English speaking population, availability of skilled manpower
z Stable economy, does not get affected by external changes
z Extensive higher education system, third largest reservoir of engineers
z High growth rate of economy
z Rapid growth of IT and BPO sector bringing valuable foreign exchange
z Abundance of natural resources
20 1.11.2 Weaknesses
Primary weakness of the Indian economy is its excessive dependence on agriculture.
Since agriculture is monsoon dependent trade, production can vary by large margins
and cause turbulence in the economy. India also lags behind in social development. A
large part of the population is still living below the poverty line. Another weakness is
the literacy rate. Although we have achieved high progress rates in terms of GDP,
more than a third of the population remains illiterate, thus, easily exploitable.
Following are its weaknesses:
z Very high percentage of workforce involved in agriculture which contributes only
23% of GDP
z Around a quarter of a population below the poverty line
z High unemployment rate
z Stark inequality in prevailing socio economic conditions
z Poor infrastructural facilities
z Low productivity
z Huge population leading to scarcity of resources
z Low level of mechanization
z Red tapism, bureaucracy
z Low literacy rates
z Unequal distribution of wealth
z Rural-urban divide, leading to inequality in living standards
1.11.3 Opportunities
India has ample opportunities for growth. The agriculture sector and SMEs need to be
encouraged and assisted as they have high potential. Indian government should focus
on defining and properly implementing the policies for rural development, as most of
the population resides in rural India. Tourism is a thriving industry in India and we
need to harness its potential. It will help raise our foreign reserves and create
employment opportunities. Following are its opportunities:
z Scope for entry of private firms in various sectors for business
z Inflow of Foreign Direct Investment is likely to increase in many sectors
z Huge foreign exchange earning prospect in IT and ITES sector
z Investment in R&D, engineering design
z Area of biotechnology
z Huge population of Indian Diaspora in foreign countries (NRIs)
z Area of Infrastructure
z Huge domestic market: Opportunity for MNCs for sales
z Huge natural gas deposits found in India, natural gas as a fuel has tremendous
opportunities
z Vast forest area and diverse wildlife
z Huge agricultural resources, fishing, plantation crops, livestock
1.11.4 Threats 21
Introduction to
Terrorism and corruption are the greatest threats that India faces. It is because both Indian Economy
hamper the growth of people and trade, which is a must for overall economic growth.
The rising inflation, hording and black-marketing, also pose a threat to economic
development. Economic growth, mainly the exports, has seen a downward trend due
to the worldwide economic downturn and has become a cause of concern. The Indian
government needs to redefine its policies and bring more stringent reforms to steer out
of this turbulence. Following are its threats:
z Global economy recession/slowdown
z High fiscal deficit
z Threat of government intervention in some states
z Volatility in crude oil prices across the world
z Growing Import bill
z Population explosion, rate of growth of population still high
z Agriculture excessively dependent on monsoons
1.17 KEYWORDS
Economy: The economy means how wealth is created, distributed and consumed. It
concerns the ways in which a country produces, distributes and consumes the tangible,
material commodities of life.
Income Disparities: The gap between wealth and poverty is called income disparity.
Growth: Growth refers to change in size, length, height and weight of an individual.
Changes in the quantitative aspects come into the domain of growth.
Development: Development implies overall changes in shape, form or structure
resulting in improved working or functioning. It indicates the changes in the quality or
character rather than in quantitative aspects
Primary Sector: When the economic activity depends mainly on exploitation of
natural resources then that activity comes under the primary sector.
Secondary Sector: When the main activity involves manufacturing then it is the
secondary sector.
Tertiary Sector: When the activity involves providing intangible goods like services
then this is part of the tertiary sector.
Marketing: Marketing is a social and managerial process by which individuals and
groups obtain what they need and want through creating, offering, and exchanging
products of value with others.
Market: Market is an association of potential customers sharing a particular need or
want who might be willing and able to engage in exchange to satisfy that need or
want.
Marketer: “A Marketer is someone seeking one or more customers who might engage 27
Introduction to
in an exchange of values”. Marketers are the one who influence demands on the Indian Economy
product by making the product attractive, appropriate, affordable, and easily available
to target consumers
LPG Model: The new economic reform, popularly known as, Liberalization,
Privatization and Globalization (LPG model) aimed at making the Indian economy
as fastest growing economy and globally competitive.
CYP 2
1. worry
2. corollary
3. slowdown
4. ramification
5. decline
2
RETAIL INDUSTRY AND ECONOMY
CONTENTS
2.0 Aims and Objectives
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Concept of Retailing
2.2.1 Nature of Retailing
2.2.2 Growing Importance of Retailing
2.2.3 Functions of Retailing
2.3 Retail Sector of Indian Economy
2.3.1 Growth Factors of the Retail Sector of Indian Economy
2.3.2 Key Challenges of Indian Retail Industry
2.3.3 Opportunities in Indian Retailing
2.4 Emergence of Organised Retailing
2.4.1 Emerging Trends in Indian Organised Retailing
2.4.2 Challenges facing the Organised Retail Industry
2.5 Trends in Retailing
2.6 Let Us Sum Up
2.7 Lesson End Activity
2.8 Keywords
2.9 Questions for Discussion
2.10 Suggested Readings
Economic Factor
It consists of the government’s liberalized policies which are now allowing FDI into
retail. Moreover, India is now the second fastest growing country in the world and the
fourth largest economy in terms of PPP after USA, China and Japan. This implies that
the consumers especially middle and upper class ones have more disposable income to
spend. It was found out that 70 million people earn more than $18,000 per annum and
the number will rise to 140 million by 2011. Hence the situation seems interesting for
the retail companies.
Political Factor
India has been a democratic country since 1947 and what makes it even more
attractive is the current stable government which believes in market economy and
hence more liberalization in trade can be expected.
Demographic Factor
The country has the largest young population in the world, over $890 million people
below 45 years. Moreover, there will be 550 million young people under the age of 20
by 2015. Furthermore, there has been an increase in the number of working women
and nuclear families. Also there are more English speaking people in India than in the
whole of Europe taken together. All these are the reasons for growth in the organized
retail.
Others
Factors in addition to the ones discussed above are increase in the number of
international brands, credit availability, improvement in infrastructure and investment
in technology and real estate to provide consumers with a world class shopping
experience. Also there is a space for 15,000+ new outlets, 100 hypermarkets, 500
department stores and 2000 supermarkets.
Providing Assortments
Offering an assortment enables customers to choose from a wide selection of brands,
designs, sizes, colors, and prices in one location. Manufacturers specialize in
producing specific types of products, for example, Kellogg’s makes breakfast cereals,
and Knorr makes soups. If each manufacturer had its own stores that only sold its own
products, consumers would have to go to many different stores to buy groceries to
prepare a single meal. Retailers offer assortment of multiple products and brands for
consumer convenience.
Sorting
Manufacturers make one single line or multiple product lines and will always prefer to
sell their entire output to few buyers to reduce their costs. Final consumers will prefer
to choose from a large variety of goods and services and then usually buy in smaller
quantities. Retailers have to strike a balance between demands of both the sides, by
collecting a combination of goods from different producers, buying them in large
quantities and selling them to individual consumers in smaller quantities. The above
process is called sorting and under this process, the retailer undertakes activities and
performs functions that add value to the products and services while selling them to
consumers. A shopping supermarket of Pantaloon Retail in the name of ‘Big Bazaar’
sells more than 20,000 assortments from 900 companies. Customers can choose from
such a basket in just one location. There are specialized retailers like Nilgiris or
Barista, which offers specialized assortments of a single product line.
Breaking Bulk
Retailers offer the products in smaller quantities tailored to individual consumers and
household consumption patterns. This reduces transportation costs, warehouse costs
and inventory costs. This is called breaking bulk.
Rendering Services
Retailers render services that make it easier for customers to buy and use products.
They provide credit facilities to the customers. They display products, which attract
the customers. Retailers keep ready information on hand to answer queries of the
customers. They provide services by which the ownership can be transferred from
manufacturer to the end consumers with convenience. They also provide product
guarantee from owner’s side, after sales service and also deal with consumer
complaints. Retailers also offer credit to consumers and develop hire purchase
facilities to enable them to buy a product immediately and pay the price at their ease.
Retailers also fill orders, promptly process, deliver and install the product at customer
point. Retail sales people answer the customer complaints and demonstrate the
product for the customer to evaluate before making a choice. They also help in
completing a transaction and realising the sale.
Risk Bearing
Retailers bear a different kind of risk to the manufacturers and wholesalers. Even the
customers can come back to the retail point and return the product. In that case, the
risk of product ownership many times rests with the retailers. Many companies have
buy back schemes and return schemes whereby the retailers can always return the
unsold items to the manufacturer.
34 Holding Inventory
A major function of retailers is to keep inventory so that products will be available for
consumers. Thus, consumers can keep a much smaller inventory of products at home
because they can easily access more from the nearby retailers. Retailer’s inventory
allows customers instant availability of the products and services.
Channel of Communication
Retailers are the bridge between the manufacturer or his representative and the end
customers. They serve as a two-way channel of communication. The manufacturer
collects customer choice and preference data and provides information about existing
and new products through the retailers. The point of purchase displays provide serve
as advertisements that provide information about new products and many times
retailers inform the consumers about likely date of availability of a product or entry of
variants into the market. The shoppers get a chance to learn about products and
services from the stores and even acquire trial habits by seeing others buying a
product or service in the store. The manufacturer too collects customer data, data on
gaps in demand and supply cycles and customer satisfaction from retail points.
Transportation
Retailers also help in transport and advertising function. The larger assortments are
transported from wholesaler’s point to retailers point by retailer’s own arrangements
and many times, the retailer delivers the goods at final consumer’s point. So, retailers
provide assistance in storage, transportation and pre-payment merchandise.
The percentage that a retailer gets from the sale price depends on the number of
functions that the retailer does for the manufacturer.
Location
"Right Place, Right choice "Location” is the most important ingredient for any
business that relies on customers, and is typically the prime consideration in a
customer’s store choice. Locations decisions are harder to change because retailers
have to either make sustainable investments. When formulating decision about where
to locate, the retailer must refer to the strategic plan: (a) Investigate alternative trading
areas. (b) Determine the type of desirable store location. (c) Evaluate alternative
specific store sites
Merchandise
The primary goal of the most retailers is to sell the right kind of merchandise and
nothing is more central to the strategic thrust of the retailing firm. Merchandising
consists of activities involved in acquiring particular goods and services and making
them available at a place, time and quantity that enable the retailer to reach its goals.
Merchandising is perhaps, the most important function for any retail organisation, as it
decides what finally goes on shelf of the store.
Pricing 37
Retail Industry
Pricing is a crucial strategic variable due to its direct relationship with a firm's goal and Economy
and its interaction with other retailing elements. The importance of pricing decisions is
growing because today’s customers are looking for good value when they buy
merchandise and services. Price is the easiest and quickest variable to change.
Target Audience
"Consumer the prime mover", "Consumer Pull", however, seems to be the most
important driving factor behind the sustenance of the industry. The purchasing power
of the customers has increased to a great extent, with the influencing the retail industry
to a great extent, a variety of other factors also seem to fuel the retailing boom.
Scale of Operations
Scale of operations includes all the supply chain activities, which are carried out in the
business. It is one of the challenges that the Indian retailers are facing. The cost of
business operations is very high in India. To become a truly flourishing industry,
retailing needs to cross the hurdles:
1. Automatic approval is not allowed for foreign investment in retail.
2. Taxation, which favours small retail businesses.
3. Absence of developed supply chain and integrated IT management.
4. Lack of trained work force.
5. Low skill level for retailing management.
6. Intrinsic complexity of retailing – rapid price changes, constant threat of product
obsolescence and low margins.
1. The success of retail sector would also lie in the degree of ………… into
the lower income strata to tap the possible customers in the lowest levels
of society.
2. The demands of the buyers would also be ………… by more access to
credit facilities.
3. With the arrival of the Transnational Companies (TNC), the Indian retail
sector will undergo a …………
4. At present the Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) is ………… in the Indian
organized retail sector.
5. Availability and cost of ………… are one major areas where Government
intervention is necessary.
Contd…
44 The idea of such a change is not new. Historical experience suggests that as
countries develop, markets transform from fragmented local markets to larger
centralised markets. This process typically originates in the dry goods sector
before encompassing fresh produce, including fruits, vegetables, and dairy.
Yet in terms of speed and transformative power, what developing countries
are experiencing today is nothing short of a revolution.
In particular, this transformation has taken an unfamiliar path because it is
grafted onto agrarian systems that have often not made the transition to
“modernised” industrial agriculture. It is also taking place in the context of
immense poverty and deprivation.
In 2001 as much as 21 percent of the population in developing countries lived
in ”extreme” poverty, on less than US$1 a day (World Bank 2004).
Supermarkets are apparently no longer a rich-country phenomenon. There is
hence considerable concern that the emergence of supermarkets, especially if
it leads to retail concentration, might have distressing implications for a large
constituency of poor actors along the entire chain, from farmer to consumer.
In short, it is not clear at all if supermarkets will be part of a solution to
poverty or part of the problem.
Until now, India, like South Asia itself, did not enter these discussions.
Untouched by these global waves, India was an exception to the rule. Recent
events, however, suggest that these waves have reached Indian shores. Rated
in 2006 as the number one destination for global investment in the retail
sector—for the second consecutive year— India now finds itself conspicuous
on the radar screens of investors. Quite independently of global retail trends,
the agro-food sector has begun to attract domestic investments from Indian
corporate houses on a scale that suggests that this may well be a revolution in
the making.
This case study takes a critical look at this change. While mapping the
institutional and policy setting of the contemporary agro-food sector in India,
this study attempts to go beyond the much-publicized advantages of this
transformation related to efficiency gains along the supply chain and to train a
lens on its less obvious and possibly more troubling implications. Its scope is
seriously limited by the paucity of data and systematic research. The study is
hence necessarily speculative, going only so far as to lay out the issues and
drawing on studies elsewhere as illustrations. Indeed, this paper raises more
questions than it answers. Yet this lack of research itself makes it important to
examine this phenomenon.
The Retail Mosaic of India: The Story So Far India has in the past earned the
epithet of “lumbering elephant” for being slow in just about everything that
advocates of globalization care about. This is true of the retail sector as well.
For some years now, India has been conspicuous as an outlier.
India’s retail sector today continues to be highly fragmented. It is a complex
mosaic of diverse small-scale actors, including itinerant vendors, government
outlets, cooperative markets, and small-scale corner stores, most of which are
in the informal sector. As recently as 2002, only 2 percent of all retail (food
and non-food) trade in India was in the organized sector—the figure is put at
5 percent in the food sector. Compare this with India’s Asian neighbours, and
the nature of the Indian retail landscape becomes clear. The share of the
organized sector in Malaysia, for instance, is put at 50 percent; in Thailand, 40
percent; and in the Philippines, 35 percent (Sasi 2004).
Contd…
The Indian retail sector, food and non-food together, employ an estimated 8 45
Retail Industry
percent of the work force—the most people after agriculture. Estimates also and Economy
suggest that India has not only the highest number of retail outlets in the
world (at 12 million), but also the greatest density of retailers, at 11 per 1,000
people. In terms of size, only 4 percent of all retailers operate in spaces larger
than 400 square feet. Consequently, in per capita terms, availability of retail
space in India is among the lowest in the world, at 2 square feet per capita.
This is in deep contrast with the 19 square feet per capita in the United States
(KSA Technopak 2005). These characteristics are mirrored in the food
retailing sector, which by all accounts is even more fragmented than the
non-food sector. The informal segment of the retail sector in India thus
comprises a large number of small-scale, low-investment retailers, each
serving a small catchment of consumers.
Despite this umbrella category, the informal retail sector is actually quite
diverse, comprising a wide profile of actors. At one end are itinerant vendors
and handcart vendors, especially for fresh fruits and vegetables. They form the
last link in a long chain of intermediaries. Typically, they procure produce in
wholesale markets and go door-to-door selling these goods. Their margins are
often thin, and they operate with little capital. Often, these vendors have long-
term relationships with buyers, in some cases even straddling generations.
Vendors also congregate in street vegetable markets (plaza markets) or by the
roadside. Although reminiscent of the farmers’ markets of the West, these
vendors function as pure intermediaries. In both cases, the transaction
between consumer and vendors is a social relationship rather than a purely
economic one, something that characterizes most traditional modes of
exchange.
It is difficult to say how many such vendors there are in the country as a
whole, given that there is no systematic enumeration.
Then there are the corner stores (called kirana) that sell groceries, dry goods,
and a limited range of nonfood items. An estimated 5 million of them dot the
retail landscape of India. The majority of food and food products are retailed
through these neighborhood stores, which typically operate in an area of 200
square feet and sell 500 to 800 stock keeping units (SKUs). Like the vendors,
they usually have a loyal local clientele, many of whom buy on credit. Many
of these stores offer home delivery services within a certain distance.
Alongside these neighborhood stores is a network of cooperative stores.
Typically these stores are owned jointly by producers and state agencies and
operated and managed by state agencies. Some are specifically for vegetables,
like the Safal chain in Delhi or HOPCOMS in Bangalore. Dairy products in
particular have always been dominated by outlets of producer-cooperatives
and operate under the aegis of the National Dairy Development Board of
India. This board engineered a “White Revolution” in dairy production under
Operation Flood. There are also more broad-based grocery and cooperative
departmental stores (which sell groceries—only dry goods—and household
and personal items) run by Civil Supplies Departments. These entities were
started with state patronage in the early 1960s at a time when shortages of
basic goods were common. The objective of the Civil Supplies Corporations
is expressly to provide “Common Man’s Needs at Affordable Prices.” Most
are responsible for drawing on the state’s stock of food staples and serve as
channels for some government food schemes.
Contd…
46 There have also been experiments with farmers’ markets in some cities. The
stated objective of these initiatives is to sidestep the exploitative terms of sale
between farmers and traders by enabling farmers to sell directly to consumers.
Several of these markets continue to function and have been regarded as
successful on many counts. One example is the Rythu Bazaars in Andhra
Pradesh, which were established in 1999.
Since the late 1990s a class of supermarket-style food stores has emerged,
especially in cities in southern India. In contrast with traditional stores, these
stores stock both dry and wet goods and often offer value-added or
convenience products and ready-to-cook items, like pancake batter and cut
vegetables. Most often, these supermarket-style stores are local businesses
that have no or few branches and are typically owned by entrepreneurs who
make medium-scale investments.
Because India is a vast and diverse country, there are significant regional and
rural-urban differences in the particular mix of retail institutions. For instance,
until recently, cities in the south have had more supermarket-style stores than
have north Indian cities. Similarly, small towns and vast stretches of rural
India are served predominantly by neighborhood stores and vendors.
Policy Issues
Why has India been Different?
Given this complex retail mosaic in India, why has change, specifically
defragmentation, in the retail sector been so slow in its coming? Starting with
broad-based economic reforms in 1991, perhaps even earlier, there was a
pronounced increase in private participation in many sectors of the Indian
economy—the striking examples being telecommunications and information
technology. At the same time, socioeconomic parameters—such as
diversifying diets and growing urban incomes—that provide the enabling
conditions for such growth were likely already present in the 1990s. Why then
did large-scale food retailing, barring a few cases, not emerge?
The answer to this paradox lies in a combination of factors. On the one hand
are issues relating to the policy environment; on the other hand are demand-
side issues.
One factor driving retail market development has been the flow of foreign
direct investment into developing countries. When retail markets in developed
countries reach saturation, large-scale retailers in these countries begin to look
at other markets to invest and operate in. In several developing countries, the
opening up of economies to FDI spawned investment in food retailing. In
Latin America, for instance, the food retail sector is increasingly and
overwhelmingly operated by multinationals, and 70–80 percent of the top five
chains are multinationals. In most cases, a handful of multinationals like
Ahold, Carrefour, and Wal-Mart and smaller chains such as Casino and Metro
Makro have dominated this transformation within countries (Reardon and
Berdegue 2002). Regional multinationals such as Dairy Farm International
(Hong Kong) and Shoprite (South Africa) have played this role too. Where
FDI has not been directly involved, it has nevertheless influenced the
transformation through participation in joint ventures; in China, for instance,
Lianhua (the Shanghai-based retailer) partnered with Carrefour.
In the case of India, FDI has been disallowed in the retail sector and continues
to be prohibited. The government has repeatedly staved off pressure from
Contd…
different quarters to change this policy. India has allowed foreign participation 47
Retail Industry
only in wholesale cash and carry operations, single-brand retailing, and Economy
franchising and joint ventures, and licensing arrangements. In 2006 the Indian
government permitted only up to 51 percent foreign investment in single-
brand retailing. Owing to this policy framework, multinationals could engage
in only a limited way. Thus, FDI restrictions largely explain the absence of
large foreign retailers in India.
Although FDI restrictions are a valid explanation, it has been argued that this
cannot be an adequate explanation for the absence of large retailers per se,
because India does not lack domestic capital. Yet throughout much of the
1990s, there were few large-scale investments in the retail sector. Some
retailers grew steadily and successfully served a niche market in urban
centers, such as Food World. One of the pioneers in supermarket-style food
retailing in India, Food World was started in 1996 by the RPG Group, later
collaborating with Dairy International of the Jardine Matheson Group.
Food World was one of the first retail players in India to introduce “modern”
inventory management systems and develop its own private label. Similar
ventures were mostly confined to the southern states. For much of the 1990s,
there were only a handful of such retailers. Until about 2000–2001, Chennai
had five organized food and grocery retail chains, whereas other big cities
such as Bangalore, Delhi, and Mumbai averaged only two to three such chains
(Anand and Nambiar N.D.). Several Indian corporate houses had been eyeing
the food retail trade, but they perceived that the policy environment, among
other things, was not entirely conducive. For instance, industry sources often
cited urban real estate laws as a constraint on operations; the Urban Land
Ceiling Act limits the physical space available to businesses. Industries also
claimed that the many taxes and octroi levied on organized retailing
complicated operations.
The other aspect of policy that has confined large businesses is in the area of
procurement and agro processing. Here, potential investors had to contend
with several issues. Corporate involvement in agricultural production and
trade has traditionally been severely curtailed in India. As in retailing, FDI
was disallowed, except in tea plantations. The highly fragmented supply
chain, coupled with the lack of high-quality infrastructure, meant that food
retailing posed an extraordinary logistical challenge. Of those early entrants
that took up food retailing in the 1990s, some exited soon after, ostensibly
because of logistical problems (Nanz, for example, closed down in 1999).
There was also a perception that demand was not large enough to support the
scaling up of operations—something that is critical given thin margins on
groceries. Although urban incomes, especially among the middle class, were
rising and consumption patterns changing, the trend had only just begun and
had yet to gather momentum. Furthermore, given strong and resilient regional
preferences for consumption baskets, the consumers themselves were too
heterogeneous to be served by large supermarkets. In fact, large-scale retailers
that recently entered the market acknowledge this heterogeneity: “The product
offering in two stores 12 kilometers away is totally different” (A.T. Kearney
2005, 4). For this reason many of the supermarket-style ventures have
confined themselves to a particular region within India, even particular cities.
For example, the RPG Group’s Food World, Nilgiris, Margin Free, Giant,
Varkey’s, and Subhiksha all operate in southern cities; Sabka Bazaar operates
in the capital region of Delhi; Haiko and Radhakrishna Foodland are Mumbai-
centric; and Adani has been Ahmedabad based (Anand and Nambiar N.D.).
Contd…
48 The Beginnings of a Revolution Despite the early languor of retail
transformation, much of this has changed, especially since 2001. It seems that
the Indian retail sector has taken flight. On the demand side, there is no
denying that most of the socio-economic parameters that drive the growth of
organized retail food marketing are present in India today more than ever
before. The average Indian household spends around half of total household
income on food. Diets have diversified considerably in favor of new foods,
including other cuisines. There is broad agreement that since liberalization
and economic reforms in 1991, a marked shift has taken place in the mindset
of the Indian consumer from need-based shopping to lifestyle shopping.
Twenty-four percent of India’s population falls in the 20- to 34-year-old age
group (A. T. Kearney 2005) and seems to spend more freely than the previous
generation did. High incomes fueled by tertiary sector growth have also
created a new professional middle class that has begun to find intrinsic value
in shopping experiences and consumer choice. This attitude permeates all
areas, including food. This class has greater mobility and more contact with
other countries and cultures, so that urban upper-class consumers look more
like one another than before, blurring socio cultural boundaries. Urban
lifestyles have changed perceptibly, and the growth in urban consumerism and
a new “way of life” translates directly into huge potential demand for branded,
packaged, and ready-to-eat foods. At the same time, there is rising concern
about food safety among these classes, raising demand for foods and
beverages that are hygienic, safe, and trustworthy.
The growth of the bottled water industry in India, for instance, is testimony to
this fact. Mainly on account of these trends, the food retail sector in India
today is worth about US$200 billion. Given that organized retail has been
registering growth rates of approximately 40 percent a year over the past three
years, it is expected to grow to US$460–470 billion by 2010 (CII and
McKinsey and Company 1997).
Simultaneously, there has been a reorientation of government policy. This has
its roots in the economy-wide reforms that began in 1991. Over the decade
since, there has been a gradual change in policy in favor of greater private
sector participation in different sectors. Recent policy changes for food
processing have spawned the growth of that industry, both for export and for
the domestic market. Policy changes have also provided some enabling
conditions for retailers in terms of logistics and supply chain management (see
Box 1 for examples).
Box 1: Recent Policy Initiatives in the Food – Processing Industry
1. Most processed food items were exempted from licensing under the
Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, except items
reserved for the small-scale sector and alcoholic beverages.
2. Food-processing industries were included in the list of priority sectors for
bank lending in 1999.
3. Automatic approval for foreign equity up to 100 percent is available for
most processed food items except alcohol, beer, and those reserved for the
small-scale sector, subject to certain conditions.
4. The excise duty on processed fruits and vegetables was lowered from 16
percent to 0 percent in the 2001–2002 budgets.
Contd…
5. Licensing powers were delegated to regional offices under the Fruit 49
Retail Industry
Products Order, 1955. and Economy
Budget of 2004–2005
1. Under the Income Tax Act, the government allowed a deduction of 100
percent of profits for five years and 25 percent of profits for the next five
years for new agro processing industries set up to process, preserve, and
package fruits and vegetables.
2. The excise duty of 16 percent on dairy machinery was reduced to zero to
help promote the dairy processing industry. The excise duty on meat,
poultry, and fish was reduced from 16 percent to 8 percent.
Budget of 2005–2006
1. The customs duty on refrigerated vans was reduced from 20 percent to 10
percent.
Domestic firms have started responding strongly to this latent demand, helped
along by a more conducive policy environment. The star entrant has been
Reliance, a leading Indian conglomerate with no prior agribusiness
experience, which announced that it would invest US$3.4 billion to become
the country’s largest modern retailer by establishing a chain of 1,575 stores by
March 2007. Hypercity Retail, a subsidiary of K Raheja Corp Group, plans to
open 55 hypermarkets by 2015, and Bharati is set to follow with similar plans.
Besides these examples of recent ventures and corporate expansion plans,
several other enterprises have expressed similar ambitions, pointing to the
immensity of the transformation currently underway.
Meanwhile, foreign investors are exploring ways to overcome policy
obstacles to operating in India. Wal-Mart is considering opening a Sam’s Club
wholesale business through a joint venture and selling strictly to other
retailers. This strategy skirts the issue of not being able to sell directly to
consumers and establishes a presence in the local market. Tesco is planning to
enter the market through a partnership with Home Care Retail Mart Pvt. Ltd.
and expects to open 50 stores by 2010.
Organized food retailing is still in its infancy. For instance, food retailers in
India today are quite different from their counterparts in the developed world.
Indian retailers have extremely high average SKUs for fruits and vegetables
relative to their western counterparts, mainly on account of their
heterogeneous clientele with particular cultural and regional preferences.
Store areas are not particularly large—anywhere between 2,000 and 10,000
square feet. Arrangements for sourcing vary across actors. Some retailers
choose to buy from the wholesale market, whereas others have dedicated
suppliers, small and large. Investments at the front end and in consumer
interface, observers concur, have been tremendous. The extent of investment
in the back end, in terms of on-farm handling, storage, and transport, has been
lower. One exception is Metro, which made deep investments in building a
high-quality supply chain to support its operations. Observers suggest that
whereas some retailers have adopted a “big bang” approach and sought to
maximize the number of new outlets and spatial reach, others have adopted a
measured approach and focused on putting reliable supply chains in place.
Metro, with only two stores in operation in over five years, is often cited as an
example of the latter approach.
Contd…
50 With the fledgling transformation in flux, a shakeup is inevitable and
impending. How it unfolds is a matter of current interest. For instance, in
some urban neighborhoods, where there was just 1food retailer five years ago,
now there are 10. In some of these outlets, turnover of merchandise has fallen
by half in the face of competition; others are even losing money. Observers
predict that in the near future, retailers will end up carving out niches for
themselves within the food retail sector or will reposition themselves and
consolidate. Only time will tell.
Stakeholders
So far, the discussion of the retail transformation in India’s agro-food sector
has been largely celebratory, at least in the popular media. Yet this complex
transformation is bound to have both winners and losers. Clearly, two issues
merit careful scrutiny. First, how will the efficiency gains from this
transformation are distributed among actors? Will it be equitable, or will the
rents be cornered by those with greater economic power? Second, what kinds
of costs will be associated with the displacement of livelihoods that such a
transformation will entail?
Policy makers clearly recognize the importance of these issues. In a speech in
early 2005, Union Minister of Commerce and Industry Kamal Nath told a
gathering of business leaders, “If any of you have come here to hear from me
whether or not the Government is about to announce FDI in the retail sector,
you are going to be disappointed.... The nature of the retail sector in India is
too complex for a hasty decision to be taken in this regard” (Nath 2005). It is
therefore imperative to examine the exact nature of potential gains and losses
to the different stakeholders.
Indian corporate houses would stand to gain the most, especially given current
FDI regulations. Recent years have seen a concerted effort by industry groups
such as Federation of Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) and
the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) to secure important changes in
retailing policy. Their pitch to the government centers largely on efficiency
gains from the technological changes brought about by large-scale retailers.
This approach could be a way to address the huge waste in Indian agriculture.
Figures suggest that as much as 30 percent of produce is wasted annually, and
only a fraction of agricultural produce is processed—as low as 2 percent for
horticultural crops (Ministry of Food Processing Industries 2006). Investment
in cold storage and processing by large-scale retailers would redress this
situation and lead to huge efficiency gains. Industry groups also argue that
retailing is a highly labour-intensive sector and would generate employment.
Some also claim that larger retailers would bring in more tax revenue and
conform to labour laws, because it is much easier to monitor and enforce these
regulations for large retailers than it is for the informal retail sector, which is
diffuse and small in scale.
The supporting and ancillary sectors, such as processing, cold storage, and
transport, constitutes the other group of stakeholders. Large investments in
these facilities, especially in the rural areas, would be welcome in the context
of a weak rural industrial base if they generate employment.
As far as FDI policy goes, domestic industrial groups have been somewhat
more divided. Some lobbying groups recognize that Indian industry would
likely benefit from joint ventures with foreign counterparts, which would
bring in new, state-of-the-art technology and larger investments. Industry
Contd…
observers suggest that Indian retailers have an advantage over foreign retailers 51
Retail Industry
because success in the retail trade in India has a significant component and Economy
relating to home-ground advantage— that is, understanding the heterogeneity
and particular characteristics of the Indian consumer— not to mention that
Indian retailers have a head start. In fact, the swiftness with which Indian
businesses are entering the retail sector suggests they recognize this! On the
other hand, some fear that domestic firms might lose out to larger foreign
retailers.
This concern is universally true for another stakeholder group—small traders,
who form a large constituency. As expected, they have been at the forefront of
protests against large retailers with deep pockets. When Metro, the German
cash-and carry wholesaler, opened an outlet in Bangalore, the “Silicon
Valley” of India, the joke went that it probably saw more protesters than
customers. Whereas retail traders often have professional associations that
enable some sort of collective action, itinerant vendors have little power or
voice, let alone say, in matters of policy. They are diffuse and operate at a
small level, and although they network with one another, they rarely have
collective lobbying power.
The nature of actors in the informal retail sector in India merits attention. It is
often mentioned that the retail sector serves as a receptacle for the self
employed.
A large section of this group has few employable skills and turns to retailing
produce or groceries for lack of better opportunities. Although not true across
the board, this is certainly true of itinerant vendors and street vendors. From
this perspective, a supermarket that captures their clientele could simply
dismantle their livelihoods.
As it is, this group has in the past suffered the consequences of city-level
actions, such as forced evacuations. It is also difficult to imagine that they will
be absorbed into the formal retail sector in any way, given their lack of
marketable skills. There are supermarkets, however, that incorporate vendors.
A retail format called store within- store (adopted by Fabmall, for instance)
accommodates existing vendors within the supermarket, providing them with
not only store space, but also equipment like refrigerators. Similarly, Safal’s
chain of fruit and vegetable outlets in Bangalore serves as a supplier to
vendors in the morning and an open shop to individual buyers during the day.
These formats may aid rather than displace local vendors.
Consumers, another stakeholder group, are of course central to the discussion
on retailing. They are often used prominently as mascots for the retail industry
to tout consumer benefits such as greater choice, higher quality, and improved
shopping experiences. Moreover, the emergence of supermarkets, with their
sophisticated supply chains, ensures safe products that conform, typically, to
recognized grades and quality standards.
This conformity is perhaps the hallmark of supermarket – style food retailing
and is particularly important in India, where food-borne diseases and rampant
adulteration by unscrupulous dealers are prevalent.
On the question of price, however, the benefits may not be as widespread.
Consumers straddle the entire spectrum of socioeconomic classes in India and
are therefore highly heterogeneous. It may well be that the ones who are most
likely to benefit from supermarkets are the urban middle and upper-middle
classes. This group has emerged from the post-liberalized India with the
Contd…
52 greatest spending power. The less visible, but certainly much larger, class of
consumers consists of the poorer segment of the population. It is difficult to
say how supermarkets will change things for them.
Only a few supermarkets in India have made claims of cheaper food.
Specialized discount chains like Subhiksha, which focus on own-brand
retailing of grains and pulses, are indeed much cheaper. Food World claims
that its produce is 15 percent cheaper than alternative sources. Most other
retailers, however, have focused on exploiting consumers’ willingness to pay
for convenience, choice, or a high-quality shopping experience. It is difficult
to imagine these supermarkets catering to low-income groups. Over time,
however, given the high contestability of retail markets, it is conceivable that
supermarkets will indeed offer lower prices across the board.
In a country like India, this situation still leaves the issue of social access.
Will supermarkets coexist with traditional food retail markets that will
continue to serve the excluded segment? It is difficult to say. If, for instance,
consumers patronizing the informal retailers are wooed into supermarkets, it
would jeopardize the survival of the former. In that case, poorer consumers
may be hurt by the coming of supermarkets.
Retail power also raises important questions about the relative position of
farmers, and “manufacturers” more generally, in the agro-food supply chain.
Questions about the supply chain are especially relevant in the context of
India, where the industrialization of agriculture is happening in tandem with
the retail transformation, and these questions have attracted the most attention
from researchers. Studies of the Indian case, however, are relatively scarce at
present. Vertical linkages are sometimes beneficial to small, poor farmers, and
at other times they are not. The effects of vertical linkages for small farmers
seem to vary across crops and regions and with the exact nature of
arrangements.
In India, procurement strategies cover the entire spectrum. At one end, for
instance, is Bharti’s Field Fresh, which contracts only with large farmers
cultivating a minimum of 1,000 acres? Its executive explained, “I can manage
ten or twenty farmers, but not thousands” (Witsoe 2006). On the other hand,
Choupal Fresh plans to source from small farmers with as little as one acre
under cultivation. Others procure from wholesale markets as well as farmers.
Systematic research would yield a clearer picture of this aspect of the agro-
food industry.
Irrespective of whom retailers purchase from, these sources face one common
problem: Strategic decisions at the retail end can have sudden and costly
impacts on producers up the commodity chain. For instance, given that retail
markets can be highly contested, retailers face pressure to keep procurement
costs low. If the retailers are monopolists at the farmer’s end, they achieve this
by driving down the price paid to the farmer. This issue is of course an
empirical one, valid in some instances and not in others. In a country like
India, however, with a huge population of small farmers, this risk to farmers
must be an important consideration.
Although the coming of supermarkets clearly has both positive and negative
ramifications, the issue is complicated by a woeful lack of data and research.
In India, more than elsewhere, there is not much clarity on how these
developments will affect the different stakeholders, partly because the
phenomenon is so recent.
Contd…
Policy Options 53
Retail Industry
For the government, this retail transformation presents a confounding and Economy
problem. As control over the agro-food chain devolves to large-scale private
sector players with deep pockets, several critical questions emerge at various
levels.
On the one hand, the ongoing agrarian crisis and the erosion of rural
livelihoods are pressing concerns. In that context, and given the enormous
postharvest wastage, the emerging food retail scenario could solve some
problems—it could ensure postharvest efficiency in supply chain management
and stable markets for farmers. It can also be an instrument for bringing about
changes in cropping patterns, agronomic practices, pesticide use, and
harvesting techniques, with important implications for farm incomes. Modern
supply chains would also ensure traceability, and with monitoring, contribute
to safe food that measure up to recognized quality standards. The retail sector
would generate employment along the entire supply chain, including in
intermediate sectors such as cold storage and transport. Needless to say,
consumers would presumably benefit not only from having greater selection
of produce and shopping experiences, but also from having access to high-
quality produce.
At the same time, there are those who would almost surely be hurt—
wholesale traders, retailers, itinerant vendors, and even poor consumers. As
for farmers, it is not clear how much of the efficiency gains would in fact
accrue to them. How can the government negotiate this?
At one level, the issue is to what degree the government should enable such a
transformation. This issue relates to two sets of policies. First, should it press
on and ultimately open up retailing to foreign investment? Second,
disregarding FDI, should it reconfigure domestic policies, including those
related to urban real estate and agricultural marketing, to allow businesses to
link up and scale up operations?
At another level, how should the government address the livelihood issues of
those who might be swept away by these changes? Should its policy be
compensatory so that it helps them cope, or should it enable players in the
informal retail sector or farmers to be part of this change?
A third critical question pertains to institutional diversity. Regardless of how
inclusive this retail transformation may be, is the preservation of institutional
diversity in agro-food marketing channels desirable for its own sake, as an end
in itself? If so, what kinds of policy instruments can ensure that diversity is
preserved?
Opening up FDI in retailing, much fear, is the thin end of the wedge. With it
will come, inevitably, the tendency toward concentration. Historically, a
period of mushrooming supermarket ventures first generates a highly
contested market; in the second phase, there is a shake-up that promotes a
trend toward consolidation in the sector. In Latin America the top five chains
in each country control 65 percent of the supermarket sector, compared with
40 percent in the United States and 72 percent in France (Reardon and
Berdegue, 2002).
This consolidation can happen in two ways: Foreign chains can acquire local
chains, or larger domestic chains can acquire smaller chains and independents.
Alternatively, consolidation can occur through development of new outlets.
Both processes have happened in Latin America. FDI is thus bound to amplify
Contd…
54 and hasten the process of consolidation, owing to the sheer amount of capital
available to large multinationals. In the first eight months of 2002, for
example, five top global retailers spent US$120 million to build new stores in
Thailand.
During 2002 Wal-Mart spent US$660 million in Mexico (Reardon 2006).
Multinationals have already begun acquiring Indian firms in the food
processing industry, and this process could occur in food retailing as well, as a
prelude to consolidation. On the other hand, it is clear that even in the absence
of FDI, the retail revolution has well and truly begun and India’s domestic
firms are not particularly capital constrained. Opening up retailing to FDI
would only accentuate the trend and not alter it in any significant way. The
next question pertains to the policy environment for domestic industry. Can
the government incorporate this retail transformation, driven by the private
sector, into its broader agenda of poverty alleviation and food security? If so,
how?
The arguments straddle both positive and negative responses to this question.
If supermarkets are to aid poverty alleviation rather than obstruct it, then they
need to be inclusive of the poor—not only the poor farmer, but also the poor
consumer and poor trader.
Few would disagree that many informal sector food retailers need better
livelihoods and that it is desirable to enable them to achieve this goal, if
necessary by helping them exit this sector. Whether supermarkets can do this
in a positive way, however, is the critical question. If supermarkets do in fact
crowd out the vendors, these people are unlikely to be absorbed into the sector
as employees. A recent entrant to food retailing,
Reliance, announced that its strategy is to employ students and housewives in
addition to hiring employees from other retailers. On the other hand, firms
such as Food World have specifically trained youth from economically
weaker segments of the population as staff. In terms of aggregate employment
effects, studies suggest that the traditional retail channels are far more labour
intensive than the formal retail sector. A study of retail food channels in
Vietnam found that every metric ton of vegetables sold accounted for three
times as much employment for street vendors as for supermarket staff (Asian
Development Bank 2004). If this is true in India, it makes a strong case for
supporting the informal retail sector, improving the condition of informal
actors, and indeed maintaining the institutional diversity of the food retailing
sector.
Experience in Latin America suggests that small traditional stores and plaza
markets have been losers. In the six largest countries of South America, there
was a marked shrinkage in plaza markets in the 1990s: 64,198 small shops
went out of business in Argentina between 1984 and 1993, and 5,420 in Chile
between 1991 and 1995. The exceptions were fruit and vegetable specialty
shops (Reardon and Berdegue, 2002). One cannot assume that smaller traders
will be able to make the necessary investments to be able to compete with
largescale retailers. On the other hand, they do not always fail. Farina et al.
(2004), for instance, document that in Brazil the number of traditional retailers
and independent supermarkets increased by 33 percent and 7 percent,
respectively, between 1994 and 2002, whereas the number of chain retail
stores declined by 21 percent. In India, industry observers point out that
informal food retailers are very resilient and may have risen to the challenge.
Some informal retailers have upgraded their storefronts, improved in-store
Contd…
displays and customer service, and adopted more sophisticated stock 55
Retail Industry
management and billing procedures. These changes show that traditional and Economy
retailers can adapt, and even thrive, against the odds.
As for consumers, supermarkets in India have focused exclusively on niche
markets in urban areas catering to the upper middle class. There is some
evidence that poor consumers in developing countries, including Vietnam,
rarely have access to supermarkets owing to distance as well as higher prices.
In other countries, however, supermarkets tend over time to cater to poorer
sections and serve non-urban centers, often by developing satellite chains with
different formats (such as Shoprite in Zambia). About 40 percent of Chile’s
smaller towns now have supermarkets, as do many small to medium-sized
towns even in low-income countries such as Kenya. In China, supermarkets
are now spreading beyond the top 60 cities. The fact remains, however, that as
long as there is a large segment of extremely poor people, supermarkets will
find it a challenge to reach out to them. In this context, will the retail
channels, public and private, that already serve them survive and continue to
do so?
Finally, what about small farmers? To what extent do supermarkets procure
from local producers as opposed to importing from other countries? Also, to
what extent are small and marginal farmers included in the supply chains of
the retail food sector?
The evidence on domestic and small farmer participation in the supermarket-
driven food chains is mixed. Reardon and Berdegue (2002) estimated that
supermarkets in Latin America buy 2.5 times more fruits and vegetables from
local producers than all the exports of produce from Latin America to the rest
of the world. On the other hand, Shoprite Checkers in Zambia has been
criticized for sourcing supplies through its parent company in South Africa
rather than from Zambian producers (Mpundu 2005). In general, evidence
suggests a range of procurement systems, from total reliance on traditional
wholesalers delivering to individual stores (for small chains), to outsourced,
decentralized procurement systems (for small to medium-sized chains), to
procurement from large scale, specialized wholesalers or processors
(Berdegue et al. 2005). Some studies find that supermarkets tend to source
from large-scale processors in order to reduce transaction costs, because those
processors possess adequate logistics and transportation capacity and are able
to meet the private standards of the retailer. For example, the Xiaobaiyang
chain in Beijing is known to have shifted from 1,000 to 300 processed food
suppliers in two years as it centralized its procurement system (Hu et al.
2004). Similarly, leading Russian chains focus only on a handful of foreign
and domestic suppliers for dairy products (Dries and Reardon 2005). Some
other studies show substantial involvement of small growers (such as for
tomatoes in Nicaragua and Guatemala and lettuce in Guatemala). Nonetheless,
small farmers who do not have the capital to meet the requirements of
supermarkets tend to be excluded, as illustrated in studies of potatoes in
Ecuador (Zamora 2004) and vegetable producers in Thailand (Boselie 2002).
Also, the net benefit to the farmer of selling to supermarkets rather than to
traditional markets is not always higher. For Guatemalan tomato farmers,
Hernandez et al. (2004) show that there is not much difference in net return
between selling to wholesalers that sell to supermarkets and selling to
wholesalers that sell to traditional retailers. There is a perception, however,
that the market risk is lower when a farmer enters a relationship with a
wholesaler dedicated to the upper-tier market, such as supermarkets. For
Contd…
56 growers to enter these markets, it appears that farmers’ associations or
cooperatives tend to be necessary to reduce transaction costs, but these do not
guarantee market access.
Conversations with farmers in southern India suggest diverse outcomes. In
some areas farmers are immensely pleased with the advent of retail food
buyers, who pay them competitive prices and have had a disciplining effect
on the commission agents and wholesalers. In other places farmers are
disenchanted with these buyers for reneging on oral commitments to buy and
forcing prices down. What is certain, however, is that supply chain issues are
critical in a country where smallholders predominate. Given this mixed
evidence, it is difficult to draw up a prognosis for the small farmer in India.
Although the empirical evidence clearly offers several lessons and insights,
the government walks a tightrope and must weigh the potential benefits of
such transformation against its possible negative consequences—and find a
way to make supermarkets a part of the change it seeks to bring. As more
research on these various aspects of agro food retailing filter in, the situation
should become clearer. No wonder then that the minister in his 2005 speech to
business groups appealed for caution in policy making, and against haste.
Question
You are required to recommend to the Government of India a set of policies to
be pursued to guide future developments in the food retail sector, taking into
account the interests of the different stakeholder groups.
Source: http://cip.cornell.edu/DPubS/Repository/1.0/Disseminate?view=body&id=pdf_1&handle=
dns.gfs/12004 28172
2.8 KEYWORDS
Retailing: Retailing can be defined as the business products and services to consumers
for their own use.
Packing: Packing means putting the products into a suitable package.
Economic Factor: It consists of the government’s liberalized policies which are now
allowing FDI into retail.
Branch: It is "an organization owning, controlling interest in two or more
establishments which sell substantially similar merchandise at retail prices".
Vending Machine: A vending machine is a machine from which the buyer can get an
article by inserting coins in it.