Recent Development in Indian Capital Market: Shaik Mohammad Imran, A Nadia, N.Saradamma, M.Ambika
Recent Development in Indian Capital Market: Shaik Mohammad Imran, A Nadia, N.Saradamma, M.Ambika
Recent Development in Indian Capital Market: Shaik Mohammad Imran, A Nadia, N.Saradamma, M.Ambika
MARKET
ABSTRACT
A capital market is a financial market in which long-term debt or equity-backed securities are bought and sold.
Capital markets are defined as markets in which money is provided for periods longer than a year. Capital
markets channel the wealth of savers to those who can put it to long-term productive use, such as companies/
governments making long-term investments. Financial regulators, such as the UK's Bank of England (BoE) or
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), oversee the capital markets in their jurisdictions to
protect investors against fraud, among other duties.
This paper discuss about the reforms of capital market in India and what is recent development in capital
market
Keywords: Financial Market, Long-term debt, Domestic Institutional Investors, High net worth
Individuals, Fiis.
I. INTRODUCTION
A capital market is a financial market in which long-term debt or equity-backed securities are bought and sold.
Capital markets are defined as markets in which money is provided for periods longer than a year. Capital
markets channel the wealth of savers to those who can put it to long-term productive use, such as companies or
governments making long-term investments. Financial regulators, such as the Bank of England (BoE) or
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), oversee the capital markets in their jurisdictions to protect
investors against fraud, among other duties.
Modern capital markets are almost invariably hosted on computer-based electronic trading systems; most can be
accessed only by entities within the financial sector or the treasury departments of governments and
corporations, but some can be accessed directly by the public. [b] There are many thousands of such systems,
most serving only small parts of the overall capital markets. Entities hosting the systems include stock
exchanges, investment banks, and government departments. Physically the systems are hosted all over the
world, though they tend to be concentrated in financial centres like London, New York, and Hong Kong.
984 | P a g e
A capital market can be either a primary market or a secondary market. In primary markets, new stock or bond
issues are sold to investors, often via a mechanism known as underwriting. The main entities seeking to raise
long-term funds on the primary capital markets are governments (which may be municipal, local or national)
and business enterprises (companies). Governments issue only bonds, whereas companies often issue either
equity or bonds. The main entities purchasing the bonds or stock include pension funds, hedge funds, sovereign
wealth funds, and less commonly wealthy individuals and investment banks trading on their own behalf. In the
secondary markets, existing securities are sold and bought among investors or traders, usually on
an exchange, over-the-counter, or elsewhere. The existence of secondary markets increases the willingness of
investors in primary markets, as they know they are likely to be able to swiftly cash out their investments if the
need arises.
A second important division falls between the stock markets (for equity securities, also known as shares, where
investors acquire ownership of companies) and the bond markets (where investors become creditors).
The Indian capital market has witnessed major reforms in the decade of 1990s and thereafter. It is on the verge
of the growth.
Thus, the Government of India and SEBI has taken a number of measures in order to improve the working of the
Indian stock exchanges and to make it more progressive and vibrant.
985 | P a g e
iv. To promote awareness among investors and training of intermediaries about safety of market.
v. To prohibit insider trading in securities market.
vi. To regulate huge acquisition of shares and takeover of companies.
986 | P a g e
The growing of mutual funds in India has certainly helped the capital market to grow. Public sector banks,
foreign banks, financial institutions and joint mutual funds between the Indian and foreign firms have launched
many new funds. A big diversification in terms of schemes, maturity, etc. has taken place in mutual funds in
India. It has given a wide choice for the common investors to enter the capital market.
987 | P a g e
Criteria for accessing the securities markets were strengthened. Issuers proposing to make the first offer to
the public of equity, or any security convertible at a later date into equity, are now required to have a track
record of dividend payment in three of the immediately preceding five years. Issuers not meeting this
requirement can get their securities listed, provided their project is appraised by a financial institution or
scheduled commercial bank, and the appraising institution contributes at least 10 per cent of the project
cost. This requirement was also imposed in the case of issues by listed companies where the post-issue
equity capital exceeds five times the equity capital prior to the issue.
In view of the circumstances in which public sector banks operated in the past, they have been permitted to
comply with less stringent criteria. The entry criteria required for other issuers would not apply to public
sector banks. Further, public sector banks have been allowed to price issues at a premium provided they
have a two year profitability record, as against the three year requirement for other issuers.
SEBI announced several measures aimed at providing greater flexibility to the issuers. Offer documents
would no longer be vetted by the SEBI. Merchant bankers and issuers would remain responsible for
ensuring compliance with the norms on disclosure and investment protection prescribed by the SEBI. A
number of steps were taken to encourage the development of a debt market. Debt issues not accompanied
by an equity component, can be sold entirely by the book-building process, subject to Section 19 (2) (b) of
the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules. The requirement of 90 per cent minimum subscription in case
of offers for sale has been done away with for exclusive debt issues, subject to certain disclosures and
exemptions under the Companies Act. Issuers have been allowed to list debt securities on stock exchanges,
even if their equity is not listed. Book-building has been allowed for equity issues of less than Rs.100 crore,
subject to compliance with the SC(R) Rules. For all companies in whose issue the promoters' contribution
exceeds Rs.100 crore, promoters have been allowed to bring in their contribution in a phased manner,
irrespective of their track record. Corporate advertisements between the date of issue of acknowledgement
card and the date of closure of the issue, have been allowed, subject to specific conditions which include the
disclosure of risk factors. To ensure that public issues were widely subscribed to and held new norms of
shareholding were prescribed.
PRIMARY MARKET DEVELOPMENTS
The downtrend in primary markets seen in 1995-96 continued in 1996-97. Capital raised through new issues
during April-December 1996 was down to Rs.10,369.21crore from Rs.14,151.1 crore during April-
December 1995. Over the same months, the number of issues fell correspondingly from 1,132 in 1995 to
793 in 1996, but the average size of the issue rose marginally from Rs. 12.50 crore to Rs.13.07 crore. The
mix of public and rights issues also changed, with the proportion of the former rising to 83 per cent of the
total. Public issues fell by only 11 per cent from Rs.9,694.48 to Rs.8,619.37 crore. The average size of
public issues rose from Rs.10.50 crore to Rs.12.66 crore. Rights issues, on the other hand, fell to
Rs.1,749.84crore, less than 40 per cent of the amount raised in April-December 1995 (Table 4.1). Their
average size also declined to Rs.15.62 crore from Rs. 21.32 crore. One hypothesis consistent with these
facts, is that it was easier to raise funds for new goods and services, than for the existing menu of products
produced by older companies.
988 | P a g e
The declining trend in issues and funds raised through the primary market is expected to continue through
the rest of 1996-97, since the number of the offer documents received by the SEBI in the first half of 1996-
97 is significantly lower than offer documents received in the first half of 1995-96. The general downtrend
in the secondary market and the stricter eligibility criteria introduced by SEBI are among the reasons behind
this downtrend in the primary market issuance.
SECONDARY MARKET REFORMS
SEBI took several initiatives to further develop secondary markets. The Depositories Act, 1996 was enacted in
July, 1996. SEBI (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 1996 were notified. They are the foundation of an
institutional framework for minimising the problems associated with physical handling of securities. They
provide a legal framework to record ownership details in a book-entry form. Other secondary market reforms
were aimed at improving the transparency and integrity of markets and market infrastructure, and introducing
uniform and streamlined market practices. A synoptic view of these reforms is presented in Box 4.2.
Custodians of securities existing for a considerable period and engaged in providing services to a number of
institutional investors can reach the required minimum net worth of Rs.50 crore in a phased manner over a
period of 5 years.
Custodians required by SEBI to appoint a Compliance Officer who will interact with the SEBI regarding
compliance and reporting issues.
SEBI will have monthly meetings with the Association of Custodial Agencies of India (ACAI) before
incorporating any changes that have an impact on settlement of transactions of institutional investors.
Stock exchanges asked to modify the listing agreement to provide for payment of interest by companies to
investors from the 30th day after the closure of a public issue.
Uniform good-bad delivery norms and procedure for time bound resolution of bad deliveries through Bad
Delivery Cells prescribed. Bad Delivery Cell procedure have helped to standardise norms.
All exchanges to institute the buy-in or auction procedure being followed by the National Stock Exchange.
In view of the falling percentage of deliveries, exchanges asked to collect 100 per cent daily margins on the
notional loss of a broker for every scrip, to restrict gross traded value to 33.33 times the brokers base
minimum capital and to impose quarterly margins on the basis of concentration ratios.
Study group constituted to make recommendations for imparting greater transparency and fairness in bulk
or negotiated deals.
Stock exchanges asked to set up a clearing house or clearing corporation.
Stock exchanges disallowed from renewing contracts in cash group of shares from one settlement to
another.
A core group for inter-exchange market surveillance set up for coordinating action in case of abnormal
volatility.
The Stock Exchange, Mumbai and other exchanges with screen based trading systems allowed to expand
their trading terminals to locations where no stock exchange exists, and to others subject to an
understanding with the local stock exchange. The setting up of trade guarantee scheme or clearing
989 | P a g e
corporation, mechanisms for handling investor grievances arising from other centres and adequate
monitoring mechanisms will be a prerequisite.
Several restrictions, including limits on the size of issues proposed to be listed on OTCEI removed, and
listing criteria for OTCEI, relaxed. Besides, OTCEI permitted to move to a five day accounting period
settlement.
Both, short and long sales will have to be disclosed to the exchange at the end of each day. They would be
regulated through the imposition of margins.
A stock lending scheme has been introduced. Stock lending has been approved in which short sellers could
borrow securities through an intermediary before making such sales. The approved intermediary should
have a minimum net worth of Rs.50 crore
Regulation of Investment Advisors
This is also an important step, and brings within the scope of regulation an important constituency in the stock
markets that was hitherto outside the purview of regulatory supervision. As Sandeep Parekh notes in this
Financial Express column:
With this regulation, the entire industry, which is involved in distribution of securities products and even
financial products, is sought to be covered. Therefore, anyone peddling a security to an investor would be
covered by the regulation and any wrong advice and misconduct would attract scrutiny and punishment by Sebi.
Until today, Sebi was sceptical about introducing these regulations because just the number of distributors
would run into hundreds of thousands and regulating such a large number would be outside the available
manpower and bandwidth of Sebi. Many of the ills of the financial industry actually have their origin in
distributors and advisors, some of whom are unscrupulous and would sell the worst product for a given investor
merely because they get a higher commission from selling that product.
Debt Market Reforms
The corporate bond market has been in a continuous stage of evolution for the last few years. While substantial
regulatory efforts have been made to enhance the market for corporate bonds, those have been incremental in
nature and have not resulted in great success. This trend of facilitating the debt securities market continues in the
present phase of reforms as well. Some of the reforms include standardization of format for presenting
information (particularly the financials), and also the provision of an enabling facility for shelf placement
document in case of frequent issues through private placement.
The trend in the corporate bond market is that despite these regulatory developments, there is an emphasis on
private placements rather than public offerings. While some of these efforts such as standardization may help
address some of the concerns of the market, there are other key impediments, as some of us have
observed elsewhere, such as the lack of a robust corporate insolvency framework that may inhibit vibrant
corporate debt markets in India.
In the end analysis, this round of decisions taken by SEBI can be considered to be a positive development, given
the slow pace of overall economic reforms lately in India.
XII. CONCLUSION
990 | P a g e
Based on this paper Indian Capital Market is already in the growth face. A clear policy decision from
government, vigilant eye from the regulators, transparency from the stock exchanges & prudent action by the
brokers & financiers is the requirement of the day to maintain the growth rate on the Securities Market. A strong
capital market provides the foundation for a developed economy.
REFERENCE
[1.] Barua, S K, V Raghunathan, J.R Varma, & N Vengateshwaran, 1994, Analysis of Indian Securities
Industry: Market for Debt, Vikalpa.
[2.] Yoshitomi, M. &Shirai, S., 2001. “Designing a financial market structure in postcrisis Asia: how to
develop corporate bond markets,” ADB Institute Working
[3.] Shirai,S. (2004).Impact of finacial& capital market reforms in india . Asia Pacific development . Vol.
NO. 2.
[4.] Bose, S. (2005) Securities Market Regulations:Lessons from US &Indainexperience.Money& Finance.
[5.] Ventaka , S. S (2006) Indian Capital Market Integration with selected developed & Developing Countries
.Applied Econometric & International Development. p. p 1997- 2000.
[6.] Dh&a ,N&Sheok&,A (2008) . Recent trends in Indian primary capital market. Indian Journal
Management Studies.p .p81- 98.
[7.] www.finmin.nic.in
[8.] www.moneycontrol.com
[9.] www.nseindia.com
[10.] www.bseindia.com
[11.] www.sebi.gov.in
991 | P a g e