PiVOT IIPPE 22 Regulatory Science
PiVOT IIPPE 22 Regulatory Science
PiVOT IIPPE 22 Regulatory Science
nternational ew or updated
e ulator echnical
ompliance and cienti ic
Writin
ore unctions
• Strategic planning
− This is important
− Having a tracker is a life of an RA
− You have a keen to any details since you are looking at various
documents
• Regulatory agency interactions
− You can see at the latter portions of the presentation on who
are the RA we mostly talked to.
• Regulatory submission
− Majority of the notion about RA
− We have to be keen to details about the documentation
− It is an advantage to have a skills about technical writing.
• Regulatory compliance
1 of 7
PiVOT: Module 22: Regulatory Science PHA6144 - Industry
instructions and investigational product, until they complete
that, FDA will to accept those data and regulatory documents.
− In other countries, when you say rolling submissions, there is
an open date, I will receive application on May 1, the review
would be on August 1, and will be reviewed next on October 1.
− Sa atin, walang ganitong legislation. Ang regulatory systems
natin are not as robust as other countries.
− Walang IND and NDA sa PH. (US FDA and EMA ay meron)
− Although we need to follow ASEAN and ICH, there are still
nuisance in our regulatory system.
− Malaysia also does not accept rolling submission.
− A good thing about not having it, we can maximize the time of
reviewers. They don’t need to review a certain protocol over
and over.
• All submission documents must be complete at the time of
submission.
• The timelines published assumes that submission documents are
edical evices ar etin learance a et
complete and no query is raised on the appropriateness and
sufficiency of the submission documents of the protocol.
Regulatory Intelligence • The timeline clock will stop for any query generated by reviewer
and resumes once a response is provided by the applicant.
• From experience, the FDA does not reject any document in
writing, rather, will request for more information related to the
or tables please enter
an chan ed in ormation
in a new column and
rom now on all chan es
document.
to the ables need to
come with a simple
usti ication o wh it is
chan ed
Regulatory Pathway for Clinical Trials of Investigational
ou can put in the
usti ication in another
column some e amples
in below table . his is or
Products
purpose.
▪ Important Considerations
• No rolling submissions in the Philippines.
− Rolling submission are usually done by some regulatory
authorities of practice wherein we allow initial submissions, and
if you have additional data that is collected all throughout the • The different forms that FDA supplies to clinical trial applications
trial, it is allowed. • You can follow the template given by the FDA.
− Ex. May phase 1 and 2 sila na data while applying for phase 3 • They are not questioning the content as long as the template is
at nagsubmit sila, pinasa nila ito plus pre-clinical data during followed.
the phase 3 application, FDA will allow them interim report
based on phase 3 protocol. They will also submit other signal
documents, labels, storage conditions, update on their
2 of 7
PiVOT: Module 22: Regulatory Science PHA6144 - Industry
• This comes from the sponsor. (sponsor letter head)
• Minsan di kasi lahat binibigay sa CRO ang trabaho.
▪ FDA Clinical Trial Applcation
• Continuation for all the documents required by the FDA for the
clinical trials.
• There is a template that you have to follow
• Some other countries do not release a GMP certificate
− Other countries do not supply GMP certificate such as China,
there is a mandate that they will not be supplying these
certificates kasi they have an expiry and usually lasts for 3
• You can see the info in the protocol but ask confirmation from the years. The China FDA noticed that they abuse these GMP
sponsor for the contents. If you have the pharmaceutical certificate. They are ready or passed the GMP inspection
document and investigational brochure, you can find also some before receiving certs. After 3 years, some of the facilities do
information here. not uphold GMP anymore. China FDA abolished the GMP
• We usually double-check with the sponsor and global CRO if all certification.
the information inputted are correct. − We can prove GMP through inspection reports. Drug
• This is the basis of the FDA for releasing import license. manufacturing license is only given to by China FDA when
passed the GMP. The PH FDA ask the most recent inspection
reports that contain Corrective Action Preventive Action
(CAPA).
− The PH FDA also asked GMP compliance statement that
visited the manufacturing plant.
− Our PH FDA is quite struct, the inspection should be done by a
third party, either China NPA or FDA or provincial China FDA.
. mport icense orm
If it is internal GMP inspection, PH FDA does not accept that.
• This is where the FDA will assign a regulatory reviewer
• We put as well the name of the sponsor, LTO, investigational • They limit it to 7 documents.
products, placebo, ancillary supplies, lab kits, we have to list all of • Usually they will ask it in a CD or flash drive
them, we have to write a justification letter for the list of ancillary Institutional Review Board (IRB) & Single Joint Research
supplies and overage of 30%. Ethics Board (SJREB)
▪ Import For Investigational Products ▪ Institutional Review Board (IRB)
• Letter of Application • Accreditation of IRBs and ECs in the Philippines is made by the
− Same format with the first template. Philippine Health Research Ethics Board (PHREB) under the
− Shorter version and introduce the investigational product Department of Science and Technology.
− We have to have the proof of payment • There are 3 levels of accreditation.
− They are very particular GMP − Only IRBs with level 3 accreditation can review clinical trials.
• Import License Application Form • Each IRB will have each own submission requirements and fees,
• Copy of the Approval of the Clinical Trial Protocol and some requires another layer of approval (such as Technical
• Copy of the Approval of the Pharmaceutical Data; Approval within the Institution or an approval by a head of an LGU
− GMP statement from manufacturing / Certificate from for community based trials).
Regulatory Body − They have their own SOPs and own submission requirements.
− Certificate of Analysis − You have to check the requirements or have another layer
− Stability Data approval.
− Manufacturing Data • Scheduled review meeting of once a month and a cut off for
− Formulation and Product Labeling submissions.
• Proof of Payment − It is important to plan submission
• Waiver Statement • Overall the Sponsor or CRO should set a timeline of 60 to 90
• Proforma Invoices days from cut-off, release of first notification, response, review of
response, and until release of second notification letter which in
most cases contains the approval.
− They wait for the recommendation for the SJREB
▪ Single Joint Research Ethics Board
• Was instituted by the Department of Health to review research
submitted by hospitals under DOH.
• If a study is conducted by 3 or more hospitals and that one of
them is at least a hospital under DOH, the study is qualified for
review by the SJREB.
• Another requirement to submit to the FD. • Not all IRBs participate in the SJREB review
3 of 7
PiVOT: Module 22: Regulatory Science PHA6144 - Industry
− It is a practice of CROs and Sponsors to submit the o Minsan sinasama naming ang pre-clinical trial data and
applications in parallel with all the participating IRBs and the GMP.
SJREB.
− Such practice, however, is not a requirement.
4 of 7
PiVOT: Module 22: Regulatory Science PHA6144 - Industry
• Application is considered filed once all documentary requirements be sent to the applicant; processing time or clock stops in this
have been submitted (including the payment of fees) step. The applicant is expected to respond to the query/ies within
• Upon receiving application, FDA will review completeness and 7 calendar days from sending of e-mail correspondence. If the
accuracy of documents in not more than 8 days and will assign a response is not received from the applicant within the required
regulatory reviewer for the clinical trial application period, the application shall be disapproved.
• The application will be processed by the FDA regulatory • The FDA shall issue a decision in not more than 8 calendar days
reviewers in not more than 14 days upon receipt of application. A upon receipt of the recommendation from the Regulatory
fee of 60,000 pesos will be charged to the applicant Reviewers.
• If there are any need for clarification, an electronic notification will • Also, COVID-19 vaccine trial should follow the existing zoning
be sent to the applicant - the processing time/clock stops in this guidelines issued by the Sub-TWG for Vaccine Development.
step. The Applicant is expected to respond to the queries within 7 ▪ FDA Approval Process
days from sending of the e-mail. If no response in received within
the required period, the application shall be disapproved.
• The FDA will issue a decision in not more than 8 days upon
receipt of the recommendation from the regulatory reviewers.
• Same din sa normal clinical trials pero mas maikli lang an
processes.
▪ Sub-Technical Working Group - Vaccine Expert Panel
(SubTWG-VEP) process
5 of 7
PiVOT: Module 22: Regulatory Science PHA6144 - Industry
• E. Accomplished Import License Application form, if the IP and
the Ancillary Supplies are to be imported into the Philippines
• F. Letter of Authorization, if the applicant is not the Sponsor
• G. Clinical Trial Protocol Amendments where applicable
• H. GCP Certificate and Protocol Amendments
• I. Informed Consent Form, Assent form (if applicable), in English
and FIlipino version
• J. Investigator Brochure (IB)
• K. Pharmaceutical Data (ASEAN Common Technical Dossier • Some of the forms are patterned in the SJREB.
should be followed)
• L. GMP Certificate
▪ Bureau of Quarantine
• M. Shipping Condition for IP
• N. Labeling Materials (Primary/Secondary Packaging) for IP
• O. Proof of Payment (Php 2,525.00)
• Upon receipt of endorsement from VEP & Ethics Board through
SubTWG Vaccine Development
• FDA AO 2020-029 - Guidance on Applications for the Conduct of
COVID-19 Clinical Trials
• https://www.fda.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/FDA-
Circular-No.-2020-029-1.pdf
▪ Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Depend and vary per institution.
• Basic Documents for All Studies
− Study Protocol
− Informed Consent Forms • We have to apply so that we could receive the IP to the site. It can
− Case Report Form or Data Collection Forms be an importer to do this but sometimes the CRO depending on
− CV of PI and study team members the contract.
− Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Training • Usually, iba silang document pero pareho silang binibigay ng FDA
Certificates of: (letter for approval ng FDA ar request to the bureau director)
o Principal Investigator (PI)
o Co-Investigator (Co-I)
▪ National Telecommunications Commission
o research coordinators of the study team (for clinical trials)
− Study Protocol Assessment Form
− nvesti ator’s rochure
− Site Budget
− Printed Registration and Application Form
6 of 7
PiVOT: Module 22: Regulatory Science PHA6144 - Industry
− Usually, related din sila sa document ns sinasubmit, minsan
kukang yung document na napasa.
− It is more on protocol pa rin ang tanong nila.
− They read it, but usually nirerefer siya sa sponsor kasi sila ang
nagsulat ng protocol.
− Pwede tayong mag-seek ng information sa sponsor para
makasagot sa query ng FDA.
− For technical questions for pre-clinical studies, sometimes FDA
will have questions regarding rules and forwarded it to
sponsors and forward it to their pre-clinical team. It is very
technical, they ask pictures for animal models. It is a
collaboration. FDA has technical and documental questions
and questions regarding the clinical trial protocol themselves.
7 of 7