Hindu Rashtra

What RSS Thinks and Why?

Dr. Manmohan Vaidya

About the Author

Dr Manmohan Vaidya is the joint general secretary

(Sah-Sarkaryvah) of RSS. Born in Nagpur, in 1955, Dr
Vaidya holds a doctorate in Radiochemistry, a branch
of Nuclear Chemistry from University of Nagpur.

He was also a Lecturer of Chemistry for few years

before becoming an RSS pracharak in 1983. Since
then, Dr Vaidya has held various responsibilities at
RSS which have taken him from the remotest corners
of Bharat to the farthest parts of the world. Prior to his
appointment as Sah-Sarkaryavah in 2018, Dr Vaidya
was the Akhil Bharatiya Prachar Pramukh (All India In-
charge for media relations) of RSS for 10 years.

He is a voracious reader and frequently writes on

contemporary issues in various magazines and
newspapers. He is well versed in Marathi, Hindi,
English and Gujarati languages. His ability to address
the curiosities of young minds about Sangh, socio-
cultural and spiritual issues in his unique storytelling
style, makes him very popular among the youth.

- Publisher
Introduction

What is Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)? Is it a

political or social organization? What is the purpose of
RSS? What kind of activities are undertaken by RSS?
As RSS continues to grow towards its goals of building
a stronger society and national consciousness, we
frequently encounter these queries from people of
Bharat, both young and old.

Increasing number of youth are joining RSS and

contributing to its various initiatives across Bharat.
There is a growing curiosity among people to know
about RSS s history, its vision and its stance on
different issues of national importance, from the
original and authentic sources. If you are one of them,
you have come to the right space.

Here, we bring you a curated collection of published

interviews and articles, on contemporary issues by Dr
Manmohan Vaidya, Sah Sarkaryavah (Joint General
Secretary) of RSS. Dr Vaidya s insight on Sangh along
with his engaging style of intertwining facts with
insightful anecdotes will help you understand RSS s
viewpoint on some of the critical issues that concern
our country today.

As it is practically impossible to cover the long history,

vast initiatives and ideology of the pre-independence
organization such as RSS in one single book.
Therefore, this series will lay a strong beginning for
you to understand the organization better and help
you build your own unprejudiced view. We hope that
this edition will further be fueling your curiosity to
know and engage with RSS.

- Publisher
View
Why Secularism is irrelevant in context of Bharat!
The RSS has been sceptical about the use of the word secularism in these so-called secular political parties to further their own interests.
the context of India—why is that? Moreover, any discussion about misuse of secularism is dubbed as
Secularism is the most misused word in Bharat and is invoked mostly opposition to secularism and favouring a theocratic state. This is a
to pamper communal forces. Secondly, the way it was introduced in the blatant lie and falsification of facts.
preamble of our Constitution creates doubts. During constitutional The RSS seems unconvinced about the idea of minority rights. Why
debates, inclusion of the word secularism was discussed, debated and is that?
it was decided against. Dr Ambedkar also thought it was not necessary. In Bharat, traditionally, we believe that all religions lead to the same
Our Constitution already has all the provisions giving equal rights to all destination and hence are equal. Ninety-nine per cent of Muslims and
religious groups, including all minorities, to practice, preach and Christians in India are converted, having origin in Bharat. Then how can
propagate their faith. Still, secularism was included in our Constitution, a mere change of faith make them qualify as minorities?
in 1976, during the Emergency, without any need, demand or In Bharat, Parsis and Jews are the actual minorities, because they have
debate—when many opposition leaders had been put behind bars by come from outside with their own religion. But they have refused to be
the Indira Gandhi government. tagged as “minority” and never asked for any special privilege. The talk
Secularism is irrelevant in Bharat. It originated in Europe as a response of minority interests is nothing but vote bank politics.
to theocratic states. In Bharat, we never had a theocratic state. Here, all If everybody is equal before the law, why should we have a minority
religions have been treated equally for centuries. Look at the Parsis, the commission? A single human rights commission can address any
Jews, the Syrian Christians, all came from outside and settled in injustice done to anyone.
various parts, making Bharat their home and practicing their religion
freely, without any persecution and discrimination. But in light of communal violence such as the 2002 riots and the
Sachar Committee report it can be argued that minority rights need
Like Swami Vivekananda said in the Parliament of World Religions in protection.
1893, “we believe not only in toleration, but we accept all religions as
true. ”. The essence of Hindutva is spiritual democracy. The reason behind the poor state of Muslims as highlighted by the
Sachar Committee is that the majority of them (65-70%) live in Bihar,
But what is the harm in the word being included in the Constitution? Bengal and Uttar Pradesh—states that have been economically
We haven’t got anything against the grammatical meaning of the term backward. These states were ruled by so-called secular parties for
but due to the bad intent and usage it has become synonymous with most of the time since Independence. According to Sachar Committee,
anti-Hindutva /anti-national ethos. In practice, secularism is being used the economic condition of Muslims in Gujarat is much better than in
to further a communal agenda—to favour one particular community West Bengal.
over others. As for riots, they have been happening before 2002 too. Let’s not forget
Saying that Muslims have the first right on national resources, as Bhagalpur, Maliana (Meerut), Kokrajhar. Who was ruling the concerned
Manmohan Singh did, is that a secular statement? Why should our states when these riots happened?
state provide funds for Haj or any religious pilgrimage? Even Muslim Instead of blaming the ruling party, it is important to try and understand
countries don’t give grants for Haj. I am told that Haj is fulfilled only if why these riots happen. If you look at the communally sensitive spots
you do it with your own means. in riot-prone cities you will notice that they are invariably in Muslim
Temples are subjected to government scrutiny and intervention, but majority areas.
minority places of worship are not. Is this secularism? The likes of Why don’t riots happen in Hindu majority areas? I have never seen riots
(Asaduddin) Owaisi are not communal but very secular? in Nagpur where I grew up but when I moved to Gujarat, in 1983, I
This minority-ism is fostering separatism and harming the unity of this noticed communal riots invariably happening during Hindu festivals in
ancient, great country. The idea of secularism has been misused by these sensitive areas. Riots are bad and must be avoided but talking
only about 2002 riots is wrong.
Other instances of communal violence based on accusations of love Both the RSS prayer and oath feature a pledge to Hindu rashtra. How
jihad and cow slaughter are on the rise. How would you explain does the RSS define that phrase?
them? Rashtra is often equated with nation in English. But the evolution of
They are separate issues. Sangh did not coin the phrase “Love Jihad”. nation in Europe is a phenomenon of the 15th century, as a reaction to
It was used for the first time by justice K.T. Sankaran in a Kerala high the theocratic state. This was never the situation in Bharat. Here the
court judgment. He saw a pattern of people hiding their real identities concept of rashtra (nation) has existed since Vedic times, based on a
while getting into relationships. We are not opposed to bonafide inter- shared view of life by all people living in Bharat, evolving into a unique
religious marriages, but if it is a part of some kind of design then it is a way of life, Sanskriti.
serious matter that should be discussed and rebuffed. There is a distinction between nation and state. A state is a political
As for cow slaughter, it is not a religious issue but an economic one. association, while nation means the people. Well-known French
Importance of cows grew as we became an agrarian society. It is philosopher Ernest Renan had this to say about “What is a nation”:
observed that excessive use of chemical fertilizers is impacting our soil “The soil provides the substratum, the field for struggle and labour, man
and affecting the food we eat. Importance of organic farming is provides the soul. Man is everything in the formation of this sacred
increasing. The Indian breed of cow is important for organic farming. thing that we call a people. Nothing that is material suffices here. A
Medicinal properties of cow products help everyone (people of all nation is a spiritual principle, the result of the intricate working of
religions), not just vegetarians. history, a spiritual family and not a group determined by the
From Gandhi to Bahadur Shah Zafar, everyone has spoken about the configuration of the earth.
protection of cows. Cow slaughter is already banned in J&K, a Muslim- “Two things which are really one go to make this soul or spiritual
majority state. principle. One of these things lies in the past, the other in the present.
But the conversation about the importance of cows to our economy The one is the possession in common of a rich heritage of memories
and society can no longer be separated from incidents in Dadri and and the other is actual agreement, the desire to live together and the will
Una. to continue to make the most of the joint in heritance.
We are opposed to violence in this matter and any other, but laws that “Man cannot be improvised. The nation like the individual, is the fruit of
exist should be enforced. Also, there has been a lot of false information long past spent in toil, sacrifice and devotion. Ancestor worship is of all
circulated about Dadri and Una. Now the truth is emerging in the case of the forms the most justifiable. Since our ancestors have made us what
Dadri. As far as Una is concerned, the emerging facts indicate that it we are. A heroic past, great men and glory, I mean real glory—these
was stage-managed. should be capital of our company when we come to found a national
It is often said that the RSS has reservations about the Indian flag. Is idea.”
that true? So, Hindu rashtra is an adjective of rashtra (people of Bharat) and
The Indian ag as it was adopted by our Constitution must be respected stands for the way of life that people practise in India. The Hindu-ness
by all. There have been people from the Sangh who have given up their of our society lies in recognizing the divinity within each human being
lives to protect the ag so there is no question of us not accepting the but also in accepting that religion is a personal matter.
ag. We are not interested in changing it. You can choose any path you like to your spiritual goals. Hindutva is the
Was there no objection to the flag when it was adopted? same as Bharatiya values. The confusion also arises because dharma
is wrongly translated as religion in English.
The tricolour ag emerged in the political scenario in 1921. It was
Gandhiji’s idea to have a ag representing all major communities. So there is no contradiction between a Hindu rashtra and a secular
Hence, a tricolour ag with red (not saffron) at the bottom, green in nation?
middle and white at the top representing Hindus, Muslims and No. The best way to understand this is through a quotation by Tagore
Christians. about Bharat in his essay ‘Swadeshi Samaj’:
Then itself, a lot of people objected, calling it a communal ag. The very “To feel unity in diversity, to establish unity amidst variety—this is the
idea of identifying each community separately and trying to forge unity underlying dharma of Bharat. Bharat does not regard difference as
among them was termed as communal thinking. They demanded to hostility, she does not regard the other as enemy. That is why without
have a non-communal, national ag. sacrifice or destruction she wants to accommodate everybody within
This demand was so strong that All India Congress Working Committee one great system. That is why she accepts all ways and sees the
appointed a seven - member committee (popularly known as ag greatness of each in his own sphere.
committee) to look into the matter. After hearing both the sides, the ag “Because of this virtue, in Bharat, by seeing others we wouldn’t get
committee came to a unanimous conclusion. frightened as we don’t consider any society or people as our enemy.
The ag committee report published in 931 says, “It was decided that Each fresh conict will enable us to expand ourselves. The Hindu, the
our ag should be artistic, distinct and non-communal. It was decided Buddhist, the Muslim and the Christian will not fight each other and die
unanimously that it should be of one single colour. And if there is a in Bharat—here they will find a meeting point. That meeting point will
colour that is more distinct than another, one that is more acceptable to not be non-Hindu, but very specifically Hindu.”
the Indians as a whole and one that is associated with this ancient Dr Radhakrishnan has observed that Hindutva (Hinduism) is not a
country by long tradition it is the saffron kesari colour.” religion: it is a commonwealth of many religions. If you accept the
The ag committee recommended a rectangular saffron-colour ag Hindu way of life you are free to follow any religion you like.
with a blue charkha on the top corner. The communalization of the In that case, where does the impulse for initiatives like ‘ghar wapsi’
colour saffron has happened post-Independence—particularly post come from?
the insertion of the word secular in the Constitution, when the definition As Hindus we do not believe in conversions. There are many Muslims
of what is communal and what is secular began to get distorted. and Christians who attend RSS shakhas but we do not seek to convert
them. They keep following their own faith. A senior ideologue of the The great Sarvodaya leader, Acharya Vinoba Bhave said, “Salvation
RSS, M.G. Vaidya, was professor of Sanskrit in a college run by through this way only is non-Hindu and salvation through this way also
Scottish Church in Nagpur. is Hindu”.
Once, one of his colleagues, a Christian, asked him if he can join the However, it is commonly known that a lot of people were converted en
RSS. Mr Vaidya replied, “Oh! Sure! For that you need not leave your masse here and there is a growing urge among them to reconnect to
faith. Only you have to accept that there is salvation outside Church their roots. Facilitating this urge to reconnect to roots is ghar wapsi or
also.” On this the Christian professor quipped that he cannot accept home coming. It can be seen as a process of de-conversion.
this as he will lose his zeal to convert people.

Published in Live Mint

14 Aug 2016
We never thought of RSS as a custodian of religion
Does the Sangh Parivaar see itself as the custodian/torchbearers of fertilizers and pesticides, resulting in the growing importance of
the Hindu society and religion and why?  organic farming.
No. We never thought of the RSS as a custodian of religion or anything. Even other countries are studying and accepting the importance of
We only create awareness about our ancient cultural values among Bharatiya breed of cows. It has nothing to do with faith. In Rajasthan
people. It is a false allegation against the RSS, by those very people there is a Muslim working for cow protection and having a Gaushala.
who pose themselves as a custodian or savior of the entire society. Often the RSS and its affiliates like the VHP underscore that
They see the RSS through the prism of religion. Hinduism is under attack from other religions? This, when the RSS
What according to Sangh is its role in the present Indian society? says Hinduism is a way of life.....
The RSS basically is engaged in the work of character building and The RSS has never blamed others and thinks that we ourselves are
organizing the entire society of the country. Society needs people with responsible for the present condition of Hindu society. Hence we are
integrity, character, discipline, work culture, awareness and pride about working amongst Hindus for social transformation. But Hindus are
our ancient spirituality - based view of life. It needs people with a feeling attacked and discriminated by people from a particular religion who
of love and a bond for all irrespective of caste, language, way of think that Hindus do not subscribe to the faith they believe in. What
worship et al. Only then can the country march ahead, progress and happened to pandits in Kashmir, Riangs and Chakmas in Mizoram?
prosper. Creating such people is the role of Sangh and we are seeing Their only fault was they were Hindus and refused to convert. What has
more and more people coming forward to do some social work, just out happened recently in Malda , West Bengal? Somebody from UP said
of this bond of love. Swayamsevaks are running more than 1,50,000 something (allegedly blasphemous) some months ago. The person is
service projects throughout the country in the fields of education, arrested and in police custody. Why were the Hindus in Malda attacked,
health, economic self reliance, self protection and imparting cultural their shops burnt and property looted? It happened only because
values (Shiksha, Swasthya, Swavalamban, Suraksha and Sanskaar). Hindus are in minority and the administration is biased.
How far do you think the RSS’ social and religious views matter to The RSS was supposed to pass a resolution on population
the common Indian. imbalance. You had sought a wider debate on the Upamanyu
The RSS does not work in religious arena. But the cultural, social views Hazarika Commission’s report that illegal migration from
and conduct of swayamsevaks in society has resulted in growing Bangladesh is threatening to reduce the indigenous population of
credibility and confidence about the RSS. This is the source of Assam.
widespread and consistent growth of the organisation. All sections of Sarsanghachalak Mohan ji Bhagwat in his Vijayadashami speech has
the society welcome, accept, support and trust RSS across Bharat. already addressed this issue stressing the need to have a national
Hinduism allows pursuing different disciplines and beliefs within it. population policy that looks at the total resources available and young
The importance given by the RSS to the worship of Lord Rama or hands needed for our country after 50 years. We have discussed this
devotion to cows is seen as an attempt to narrow down an issue in our last national council meeting (ABKM) at Ranchi in October
essentially diverse faith. 2015.
In RSS we have swayamsevaks who follow different religious BJP President Amit Shah recently said there is no question of
disciplines and beliefs (including Christainity and Islam). Some may compromising the core ideology of Sangh Parivar in any action of
worship Lord Rama as a deity but for many Lord Rama is an the central government or the BJP. How much weight does the RSS
embodiment of our cultural values and is adored by all irrespective of pull in shaping BJP’s policies?
one’s gender, caste, religion, language or province. The cow has been I cannot speak on behalf of Amit Shah or BJP but I think BJP as a party
the backbone of our prominently agrarian society because of the has its own ideology which is reected in its manifesto that BJP made
medicinal importance of its milk, urine and dung. It is becoming more public before the 2014 Parliamentary elections.
relevant seeing the menace created by excessive use of chemical
Bhaiyyaji Joshi said at the Pratinidhi Sabha that the prosperous students. In many districts, there is not even a single Pracharak and still
should not demand reservation and it has to be seen if benefits of growth is visible in these areas. There are a few who are not paid, but
caste-based quotas have reached the intended beneficiaries. This decide to devote all their time to doing the work of the RSS as their ‘first
was followed by the RSS saying it backs quotas for SC/ST/OBCs in priority’. These are called ‘Pracharaks’. They are hardly one percent of
its current form. Is there pressure from the BJP to not articulate the the total number. When a Pracharak wants to marry he may opt for it
Sangh’s stand on reservation? and continue to work as a RSS Karyakarta. He then ceases to be a
Unfortunately, social discrimination has been practiced in Hindu Pracharak as his priority naturally will be family matters.
society for centuries and it is based on birth in a particular caste. Such
sections were deprived of the facilities and self-honor others were Published Hindustan Times
enjoying. Reservations were provided for such class to bring them at March 20, 2016
par with others. As long as there is social discrimination practiced in
our society, reservations should continue. We all should work together
to end caste-based social discriminatory practices and create a
‘Samarasa Samaj’. If the benefit of reservation has not reached the
most deserving section of the society even after more than 65 years of
independence, we need to look into it and come with some corrective
measures to realize the vision of the Constitution makers, at the earliest.
The RSS has passed resolutions for accessible, affordable and
quality healthcare and education, you have flagged budget cuts for
these welfare sectors; which are the other areas where you think the
government needs to focus more?
It is essential that quality education and healthcare facilities be
accessible and affordable to all. Not only the government but social
institutions, educational trusts and social leaders also should take
initiative for this. That was the focus of the resolutions passed at the
Pratinidhi Sabha – 2016 in Nagaur (Rajasthan).
The RSS has been complaining that there has been a surge in the
attacks against RSS members. Your comment.
It is really a matter of serious concern that RSS members are attacked
and killed mercilessly. In Kerala one Sujith was assaulted and killed in
front of his old parents and family members by CPM goons. Recently a
peaceful protest march of BJP supporters was attacked with stones
and iron rods by CPM workers injuring 26 including ex. BJP state
president of Kerala V. Muralidharan. What is shocking is no political
party and so-called ‘torch bearers of humanity’, votaries of freedom of
expression or democracy have come forward to condemn this
murderous vendetta. No media has covered this dastardly incident in
prime time or written editorials or held discussions on TV channels. But
such violence will not deter the confidence, commitment and resolve of
RSS workers to serve Bharat Mata.
There has been a demand, especially by the youth to push for
decriminalisation of homosexuality. Dattatreya ji also indicated at
the India Today conclave that it is not a crime. Do we see the RSS
agreeing to the opinion that homosexuality should be
decriminalised?
Dattareyji himself has clarified in his tweets that “homosexuality is not a
crime, but socially immoral act in our society”. He has not advocated
punishment, but they have to be treated as a ‘psychological case’. Gay
marriage is institutionalization of homosexuality. Hence it should be
prohibited. Approach to homosexuality should be ‘no criminalization,
no glorification either’.
Changing the uniform is one indicator of the RSS moving with the
times, what are the others areas where we will see changes in
future? Has there been any decision yet, on allowing marriage for
full-time pracharaks?
Changing with time has been a characteristic of Hindu way of life.
Accordingly, changes also occur in RSS functioning from time to time
and this tradition will continue. There is a misconception about
Pracharak. There may be at least 3,00,000 active workers of the RSS
holding some charge. Not all of them are Pracharaks. Most of the
Sangh work is carried out by earning members with families or by
‘RSS’s reverence for Babasaheb not new’
How does the RSS view Ambedkar? Is it because he was against Islamic expansion?
Ambedkar was a great patriot, who strived for a transformation in Hindu No, not really. (Although you admit that he was against Islamic
society based on liberty, equality, fraternity and justice. He effectively expansion). Babasaheb was surely for Bharat. He was well aware of the
led a movement to fight against unjust and inhumane caste soul of Bharat and never took any step that went against it even while
discrimination prevailing in Hindu society. His struggle was aimed at protesting against the ills prevailing in Hindu society. In 1983, a
empowering the deprived sections to enable them to lead a dignified pleasant coincidence took place. Birth anniversary of Dr. Hedgewar
life. Besides, he was a visionary, an excellent scholar, eminent (the founder of the RSS), Chaitra Shukla Pratipada, the beginning of the
economist, foreign policy expert, labour reformer, educationist and, of Hindu calendar and Ambedkar’s birthday, April 14, fell on the same
course, constitutionalist. We want to bring these aspects of day. That day, RSS swayamsevaks under the leadership of Dattopant
Babasaheb’s personality to the forefront. Thengadi initiated a social movement called ‘Samajik Samarasata
Why is the RSS suddenly so interested in Ambedkar? Manch’ to end caste-based social discrimination and create a
harmonious society. A decade later an agitation started in Aurangabad
Neither reverence for Ambedkar nor respect for his efforts to end caste- to rename Marathwada University as Dr. Ambedkar University. The RSS
based discrimination is new for the RSS. Right from its inception, the not only openly and whole-heartedly supported this demand but also
RSS did not believe in caste discrimination and untouchability. When worked tirelessly to calm down the inimical atmosphere created by
Mahatma Gandhi visited the RSS camp in Wardha (near Nagpur) in some political leaders and parties.
1934, he lauded the absence of untouchability in the RSS, which is on
record. After Ambedkar’s demise in 1956, Shri Guruji Golwalkar (the Was he not a strong anti-Brahmanical social structure lobbyist?
then Sarsanghachalak) paid tribute to him as a Leader who possesed ‘Brahmanism’ is a politically motivated publicity jargons fabricated by
the sharp intellect of Adi Shankaracharya and the compassionate heart forces with vested interests. If it means caste-based discrimination and
of Bhagwan Buddha. inhuman practices like untouchability, then the RSS also stands against
It was because of the initiative of Shri Golwalkar that all it. Babasaheb was never anti-Brahmin. His mentor was a Brahmin. He
Shankaracharyas and Dharmcharyas passed a resolution that was against all forms of casteism and caste- based discrimination.
untouchability has no place in Hindutva or Hindu Dharma in a Dharma There are many social reformers who were from Brahmin community
Sammelan (religious conclave) at Udupi (Karnataka) in 1969. In the who fought against such social evils. It was possible for Dr. Ambedkar
RSS, we remind ourselves of the contributions made by great sons and to accommodate all because he wanted a united and progressive
daughters of Bharat ( which includes Sages, Kings and Queens, Bharat with integral approach instead of divisive one.
Thinkers, Philosophers, Social reformers, Freedom Fighters, Scientists Is it that the saffron fold is trying to woo Dalits and also restrain the
etc.) through Ekatmata Stotra (Verses of Unity), on a daily basis. This community from conversions?
Stotra includes the names of great social reformers like Narayan Guru, We are not a political outfit. So no question of wooing any community.
Ambedkar, Mahatma Phule and Thakkar Bapa which is sung with We are working to undo the injustice done to a section of our own
reverence all over India in RSS programs. So, this is not a sudden society by our own people, bridge the gap and create a harmonious
decision or a reaction. society at the earliest. As the 125th birth anniversary of Ambedkar
During centenary celebrations of Dr. Ambedkar in 1991 a mammoth (1891-2016) follows the 125th birth anniversary of Hedgewar (1889-
gathering was addressed by the then Sarsanghachalak Shri 2014), the RSS took special efforts to take the true message of social
Rajjubhaiyya (Prof. Rajendra Singh), Shri A.B. Vajpayee and Bhante harmony and national awakening that was dear to both these great
Gyanjagat ji and paid their tributes to this luminary. sons of Bharat Mata.

Published Times of India

April 3, 2016
The Fight Against Jihadi Terrorism
Three consecutive blasts in the heart of Mumbai shook the nation. making baseless allegations about the RSS’s involvement in the 26/11
Twenty-four innocent lives were lost bringing the nation’s security attack. While that happened, few questions remain unanswered: Why
preparedness and the effectiveness of intelligence agencies under the did Burney write such a factually incorrect book? Who financed the
scanner once again. Investigative agencies were put on the job of publication of 25,000 copies each of both Hindi and Urdu versions?
finding out who executed the blasts. The government reiterated its Where were these books distributed or sold? What was Burney doing in
stand on terrorism, promising to deal with it sternly. But despite all the Karachi on November 26, 2008 when Mumbai was under the terror
claims made by the government, is it really serious about fighting siege and innocent lives being lost in a brutal attack? Who was Burney
terrorism? Sadly, there seems to be a huge gap between what is being meeting in Karachi? These are questions that must be probed by a
said and what is being done at that level. One of the main reasons why national investigative agency. Why did the Congress General Secretary,
the government has been unable to tackle terrorism is the Indian Digivijay Singh release the book in two separate places? With such
National Congress party, leading the UPA government at the centre. For support, it isn’t surprising that the book was widely discussed in the
long now the Congress party has not been able to shake off the mantle Pakistani media. If that wasn’t enough, almost as an award for his
of divisive politics that it indulges in. This is the reason why it looks at efforts at maligning the RSS, Burney was appointed as an advisor in
everything related to terror through the communal prism of Hindu- Union minister Kapil Sibal’s ministry. Perhaps the appointment was
Muslim and Majority-Minority community. It is this approach that made only to appease a particular community and nothing else. It is all
makes divisive and communal politics and forces in the country more of this put together that makes one doubt the government’s very
powerful. It is also this divisive approach is covered under the garb of intention to fight terrorism, making it clear that the government is not
words like ‘secularism’ . While Pak imported terror was only plaguing serious enough. Tough situations require tough decisions just as
the Kashmir valley all this while, in the last two decades terrorists extraordinary times need extraordinary measures. Dealing with a tough
inspired, trained and sustained by Pakistan have wrecked havoc all situation like terrorism requires tough decisions from the government.
over the country. The time has come when the government looks at What is mandatory in this entire process is the fact that those found
terror as an ‘act against the nation’, an anti- national activity instead of guilty of participation and facilitating terror activities should be strongly
looking at all terror activities as communal. On 26 November , 2008 a punished for their acts, serving as an example and a deterrent to others
ruthless terror attack killed 166 innocent people in Mumbai. who might want to emulate them. But that’s an aspect that the
Investigating agencies put on the job had found clear and ample government has so far shied away from. Perpetrators of the December
evidence of ISI’s (Pakistan’s secret agency) involvement in the 26/11 2001 Parliament attack are yet to be punished by the government. Afzal
attack. While the probe was still on, 6 December 2010, the national Guru, an accused in the Parliament attack who was awarded death
capital saw the release of an Urdu book titled ‘The Truth of 26/11- An penalty by the Supreme Court through a court order on August 4, 2005
RSS plot?’ On 27 December the same year a Hindi translation of this is yet to be executed. Why is the government silent on the issue? Six
book was released in Mumbai. The book had been authored by Ajiz years since the Supreme Court order, only a month ago, on 27th July
Burney, the then editor of Rashtriya Sahara, Urdu and had 25,000 2011, the government has taken a decision on his mercy petition and
copies of both the translations printed in the first lot itself. While that forwarded it to the President of the India. On 12 December 2002, a full
was surprising, what came as a shock was the fact that both the Urdu year after the Parliament attack, the Delhi Sessions Court ordered
and Hindi version of the book were released by Congress General capital punishment for Afzal Guru for conspiracy to attack Parliament
Secretary Digvijay Singh. The book’s attempt was to say that Mossad, on December 13, 2001, waging war against the country and murder. A
CIA and RSS were behind the 26/11 attack in Mumbai. Did Digvijay year later, on 22 October 2003, the Delhi High Court, hearing the case
Singh agree with the contents of the book? Why was RSS being linked once again upheld the Sessions Court order of capital punishment. On
to the Mumbai attacks when investigative agencies were repeatedly 4 August 2005, the Supreme Court rejected Afzal Guru’s plea for
talking about ISI’s direct involvement in the Mumbai attack? On mercy, upholding the High Court order for capital punishment, one
January 28, 2011, Rashtriya Sahara printed an apology on the front more time. Yet the government has done nothing to bring the
page of the newspaper after Ajiz Burney was served a legal notice for perpetrators of terror to book. While it took the courts just four years to
complete investigation and come to a conclusion, it has taken six years later saying that he was misunderstood. But he did not quote what
for the government just to move Afzal Guru’s mercy plea from the exactly he had said.
Home Ministry to the President’s office. What is worth pondering over Interestingly, Singh’s statements over the last three or four months
is that the issue is still inconclusive. have generated all sorts of responses. Some say that Singh has lost his
Strangely, the Congress party has not been upfront with its view on the mental balance. Others more scathing in their opinion have suggested
Afzal Guru death penalty issue. A year after Afzal Guru had been sent to that he should admit himself to the mental hospital near Pune and seek
the gallows, Gulam Nabi Azad, then the Chief Minister of Jammu and medical help. Few others have even suggested that Singh’s statements
Kashmir had told according to Times of India newspaper that the are a result of the huge international and national pressure being
‘central government must rethink death penalty given to Afzal Guru.’ exerted on him to say so. Many also believe that Singh and his
Was this the view of the Congress? If not, then why did a Congress statements are not taken seriously by anyone in his own party. That
chief minister ask the government to ‘rethink’? Does the Congress aside, the fact remains; Singh is not just any ordinary person. Singh is
chief minister not trust the country’s investigative agencies? Or is he the general secretary of the oldest political party in the country. It is this
mistrustful of the judiciary of the country? Clearly, what has driven this profile that makes his statements important and significant. Given the
opinion is the Congress’s basic attitude of looking at terror through the direction the investigation is going in, it seems Singh is making an effort
prism of communalism. This is the reason why the Congress party to appease the minority community, trying to tell them that ‘we are
cannot look at an act of terror simply as an act of terror. It must always concerned about you.’ And this vote bank politics is what explains the
communalise the whole issue and debate of terrorism. A case in point statements of the Congress’s General Secretary best. Singh’s
could be Gulam Nabi Azad’s subsequent statement where he insisted penchant for vote bank and divisive politics is what made him question
thatincasethegovernmentpursuedthecour t’sorder then,‘AfzalGuru the credentials of slain Police officer Mohan Chand Sharma in the Batla
must not be hanged during the month of Ramzan.’ Does this statement House encounter. It wasn’t good enough for Singh that Sharma had
not reek of Congress’s politics of communalism and Majority-Minority been awarded the Ashok Chakra for his act of bravery by the President
divisiveness, aimed at appeasing its own vote bank? of India. Singh pursued the fake encounter theory only to serve his own
More recently, even as investigative agencies were struggling to probe purpose of vote bank politics. Singh’s ridiculous statements on issues
the July 13, 2011, bomb blasts in Mumbai, a Congress General of terror sound astoundingly similar to the spokesperson of anti-
Secretary, often described as the ‘PM in waiting’ by his own party men, national organisations like SIMI. And in that scenario, just who is
declared that ‘it is impossible to prevent every terror attack.’ Does a bothered about the fight against terror?
statement like this not undermine the government’s very intention to It is unfortunate that the principal party in power at the centre is not
tackle terrorism? Does it also not rub salt on the wounds of nation serious about fighting terrorism. Even as the police and other security
suffering at the hands of ruthless and relentless terror attacks? Another forces strive hard and loose precious lives of our security forces to
Congress general secretary, often dubbed as the ‘mentor’ or ‘political combat terrorism in this country Congress politics fails their effort.
guru’ of the ‘Congress’s PM in waiting’ went a step further, stating that Congress’s vote bank politics is lending power to the divisive forces in
the Mumbai blasts could be an act of ‘Hindu terror’ and must be probed the country. The only sure way to tackle terrorism today is to ensure
accordingly. While Digvijay Singh’s statement found huge resonance in that patriots in all political parties including the Congress come
the Pakistani media, an apolitical Aam Aadmi casually said to me, ‘It together to fight terror, leaving aside their political interests and
would have been surprising if Digvijay Singh had not made such a incentives. A concer ted effort to the save the harmonious and
statement.’ However, what needs to be asked is: Does Digvijay Singh nationalist fabric of the country needs to be made by politicians across
run an investigative agency of his own? If he has any incriminating party lines. After all these politicians must remember that their politics
proof to substantiate his statement then he should give it to the and political careers are possible only if the national unity, social
investigative agencies instead of making random statements to the harmony and democratic norms remain intact. There will be no politics
press. A much- thought- out delayed clarification was issued by Singh without the country!
 Asmita:
The identity of Bharat
Pranab Da, RSS and Undemocratic Dissonance
There has been unseemly outrage amongst certain sections of the views at the function, so why the opposition? In fact, he went on to
political class on former President Dr Pranab Mukherjee's acceptance praise the open-mindedness of the RSS, who had invited him as an
of an invitation as Chief Guest for the concluding ceremony of the honoured guest despite knowing his views; in fact, it was the ‘leftists’
RSS's Tritiya Varsh Training program. who were exhibiting their intolerance despite all their claims to the
Dr Mukherjee is a mature and experienced politician who has spent contrary in rhetoric. He remained firm in his decision to participate in
decades in public life. He has well-evolved ideas on matters that are of the function and furthermore submitted the text of his speech to
social and national significance. The invitation has been extended to Sadhana for publication. However, the magazine that claimed to be the
him with the view that this will be an invaluable opportunity to listen to vanguard of free speech refused to publish his speech, despite the fact
his views. Also, he will have the opportunity to listen to the views of the that he had been a past contributor.
Sangh and have a firsthand experience of Sangh as well. This exchange In 2010, I met with Shri Keshavan Nair, a CPM Trade Union leader from
of views and ideas is intrinsic to the Bharatiya concept of dialogue, this Kollam in Kerala. He had been expelled from the communist party for
invitation and its acceptance is but a continuation of that democratic writing two articles in a local paper on “Science in the Vedas”. Singed
tradition, enshrined in our cultural ethos. by this hypocrisy, Shri Nair decided to write extensively on Communists
So why then the dissonance and negative commentary? Why the and even published a book – Beyond Red (which he gifted to me).
opposition to this exchange? On the blurb of the book, he is quoted from the book that “The only
The resistance has surprised many, but if we were to delve into the freedom communists give you is to praise them”!
ideological basis of this opposition it would be unsurprising. Bharat’s During one of my visits to Kolkata as Prachar Pramukh (Media
intellectual spectrum’s most vocal voices are those of, an ideology that Relations In Charge), whilst CPM was in power there, the local unit of
is entirely alien to India and has been rejected the world over, for its high RSS made an attempt to schedule appointments with the editors do
level of intolerance and violent means to achieve conformity, that is Statesman, Indian Express, Times of India, Vartaman and a communist
‘Communism’. Their idea of “thought conformity” necessitates this leaning newspaper. All granted time for the meeting but the Communist
approach that not only rejects healthy exchange among diverse newspaper. The editor of the left leaning news paper declined to give
stakeholders but protests it. appointment saying he doesn’t want to waste his time. This is their
There is a lazy assumption that if you are not of a so-called leftist democratic nature and commitment to free expression. The meetings
persuasion, then by default you are a “right winger” – their view of the were a success. We had no expectation that those who met with us
ideological world exists in strict binaries, and as a result, you become would agree on every issue with the Sangh, but all were open to
someone who should be criticised, publicly shamed and protested understanding and engaging with the RSS’s views. About the
against. This is the communist tradition, verifiable with human undemocratic attitude of the news paper that declined appointment I
experience or rather oppression the world over. And yet despite told our local Karyakarta that whenever I shall come to Kolkata try to get
repeated displays of intolerance, they adorn the mantle of human rights an appointment with him.
and free speech advocates. A couple of years ago Shri Dattatreya Hosabale and I were invited to the
A few years ago at the same program, an invitation was extended to Jaipur Literature Festival to put forth the views of RSS about different
renowned social activist and Magassaay Award winner Dr Abhay Bang. social and national issues in an interactive open session with a
At that time as well eminent socialists with all kinds of ‘left leanings’ in journalist. We decided to accept the invitation and attend. At JLF as well
Maharashtra were up in arms against his decision to accept the there was opposition by leftist forces.
invitation. Their pressure politics to discourage engagement led to Individuals like Sitaram Yechury and MA Baby boycotted the festival
opinion pieces and articles in their Marathi weekly SADHANA. Dr Bang just because the RSS had been given a platform to air its views despite
responded to the pressure by stating that he was going to present his the fact that Sangh is increasingly finding acceptance, engagement
and support from the society all over Bharat. Their elitist definition of Pranab Da's decision to attend the RSS function has yet again revealed
free expression excludes even an attempt to understand such an their hypocrisy.
organisation. But what is the motivation for such protest? Is it their fear The fourth Sarsanghchalak – Shri Rajju Bhaiya had a deep friendship
that should the RSS be given an opportunity to reach out to a larger with a senior Congress leader from Uttar Pradesh. Once when Shri
audience, the veil of misunderstanding, created by spreading canards Guruji was visiting Prayag, the Congress politician was invited for an
will be lifted and the lies exposed. People will know the truth and that is interaction over tea along with the prominent citizens of the city.
the biggest fear of all. However, the politician regretfully declined, stating that whilst he
The communist ideology and such fascist opposition to free speech are wanted to attend, his presence would lead to unnecessary and
entirely against Bharatiya thought. unpleasant chatter amongst his colleagues in the party.
There is, however, another example that is in contrast to the ones Rajju Bhaiya was startled by this reticence and asked his friend if they
elucidated so far. A few years ago a delegation from the Communist would indeed make him the point of discussion. To which the politician
Party of China (CPC), visited India. They were interested in meeting responded dolefully that his friend from the RSS had no idea of how
with the Sangh and were invited at Keshav Kunj, the Delhi headquarter politics worked. Rajju Bhaiya informed him that in the Sangh it was very
of RSS. I happened to be in New Delhi and received the delegation; they different. Were the two seen in each other’s company by
also gifted me a memento depicting the Great Wall of China. I was swayamsevaks, they would not doubt his intentions at all; in fact, they
curious about their interest in the RSS. CPC being a political party, it would assume that he must be explaining Sangh to his friend. How can
was obvious that they meet leaders of different political parties here. the Congressmen do not trust such a tall leader of their own?
But why meet the Sangh? History repeats itself all these years later when a towering and
They answered that query by saying that they were a cadre-based experienced leader who is also the former President of this nation is
political party and the Sangh was a cadre-based organisation, this had being questioned by junior leaders from his party, some who regretfully
motivated them to reach out for an exchange of ideas. possess shady reputations and not even half of his experience.
To which I responded and underscored a distinction, “It is true but there How is it that not one Swayamsevak has questioned why the former
is basic difference between us. CPC is a political party that works for a President and Congress stalwart has been invited? - This is the
state-power and through a state-power where as we, the RSS on the difference between the thought process of the RSS and those who
contrary work through or for a state power. We work directly amongst claim to be vanguards of free expression -.
the society with the support of the people.” Despite this articulated It is Bharatiya tradition to exchange ideas with a diverse set of people.
difference, we had a gracious meeting. We did not refuse to meet with To reject and protest such an exchange is non-Bharatiya and an assault
them since having exchange of views and ideas is the Bharatiya on our democratic traditions, as a culture and the largest democracy in
approach. the world.
The intellectual world of Bharat is dominated by the people with some However, this debate over Pranab Da’s presence at the Tritiya Varsha
sort of ‘communist’ colour. And either because of the lack of original concluding ceremony in Nagpur has revealed the true face of these so-
intellectual thinkers in Congress and other political parties based on called proponents of free speech.
individual/ family, territory or caste identity, or they have outsourced
Furthermore, Pranab Da has resisted these attempts to publicly shame
their ‘intellectual space’ to people with communist or left background.
him and has been statesmanlike in his response, stating that he will
Though they talk of liberalism, democracy and freedom of expression,
answer with his speech in Nagpur, emphasizing thus, that his decision
they invariably are seen exhibiting the communist ideological
to attend is unwavering. We welcome his decision and his true spirit of
intolerance, intellectual untouchability and exclusion.
democracy. –

Published in Indian Express

6 June 2018
Most intolerant of them all
Thank You Pranab Da This humane worldview is also our greatest inheritance.Our neighbour
Despite the staunch protest by his own party men Dr. Pranab Pakistan (which was once a part of Bharat) also wrote it’s first
Mukherjee remained resolute in his decision to participate in the constitution at the same time. However their constitution does not
closing ceremony of the Tritiya Varsh Sangh Shiksha Varg of RSS. His speak of these values that are inclusive, it does not take note of the
conviction in the democratic principle of open engagement is worth inherent diversity, neither does it celebrate it. Now the obvious question
acknowledging with gratitude. During his visit to Nagpur, the former that arises is that when both were one country and one people, then
President visited Dr Hedgewar’s ancestral home and offered homage to why did this distinction in going forward emerge?
a man he considered “a great son of India”. The answer lies in the spirituality based integral and holistic view of life
He also paid his respects at the “Smriti Mandir”, dedicated to the that we inherit. Former President Dr Sarvapalli Radhakrishnan and
memory and service of Dr Hedgewar and Shri Guruji at the RSS Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore, have described it as “Hindu View of
headquarters and went on to place his thoughts before the gathered Life”. Pakistan rejected it and Bharat accepted it. Actually our
audience with uninching honesty. Before the program and away from constitution is not the reason of our liberal and inclusive values
the camera lens there was a meet and greet program with senior RSS enshrined in it but the result of our age old integral and holistic view of
functionaries and the special invitees, in which he participated with life.These liberal, plural values have not come to us from our
endearing simplicity. At the time of personal introductions, he constitution but through our constitution. Kahlil Gibran in his famous
suggested to have self introduction and leading by example offered a poem “Children” says-“Your children are not your children. They are
simple introduction, “I am Pranab Mukherjee”. For a man who needs no the sons and daughters of Life’s longing for itself. They come through
introduction, his simplicity was heartwarming. you but not from you, And though they are with you, yet they belong not
to you.”
Pranab Da had come with a written speech in English whilst RSS
Sarsanghachalak Dr. Mohan Rao Bhagwat spoke in Hindi, however Similarly, we are traditionally liberal, secular and inclusive not because
both speeches met at the conuence of – Ekam Sat Vipra Bahudha of our constitution but our constitution has enshrined these values
Vadanti – “That which exists is ONE sages call it by various names.” because we have been like this since ages, at least 5000 years. Hence,
Furthermore, Pranab Da explained very clearly that Bharatiya concept it is our duty to honour and follow the Constitution. The RSS has stayed
of nation based on a unique integral view is entirely different from the steadfast in this pursuit. Despite the unfair, unjust ban on the RSS
state-nation concept in the West. He emphasised upon our 5000 year imposed by the then regimes twice, the stayagrah that was carried out
old civilisational history with eloquence; highlighting the beliefs in protest was literally countrywide, disciplined and peaceful, an
embedded in our view of life – Vasudhaiva Kutumbhakam and Sarve unparalleled example of protest in the history of independent Bharat,
bhavantu Sukhina – values of diversity, secularism and tolerance, and one that was absolutely Constitutional. No other organisation or
which are further enshrined in our constitution. Dr. Mohanrao Bhagwat party can claim such a history. But consider the dissonance, those who
also expressed the same views in different words. Instead of ‘tolerance’ violate every tenet of the Constitution, take the path of violence, attack
he used acceptance of all. He emphasised that no Bharatiya can be our own armed forces, and those who suppor t the divisive,
treated as ‘other’ or alien as we all come from the same ancestors. unconstitutional activities are the one to preach the constitution to the
RSS.
Both the stalwarts emphasised in their speeches that national life of
Bharat did not ourish on the basis of one religion, language or race but On April 2, this year, the “Bharat Bandh” in the six BJP ruled states only,
on the basis of spirituality based integral and holistic view of life and the witnessed despairing scenes of unprovoked violence that was actively
values stemmed out of it. supported by Rahul Gandhi and the “secular-liberal” lobby, without any
consideration for the Constitutional and Democratic values proposed
Dr Bhagwat also clearly articulated that the Sangh would remain the by Dr Babasaheb Ambdkar and enshrined in our Constitution.
Sangh and Pranab Da, Pranab da as this is the Bharatiya tradition of
acceptance, neither imposition nor appropriation but acceptance. After Pranab Da’s speech, those who had been anxious about what this
engagement might reveal were quick to come up with sanctimonious
This very view of life and value system is reected in our constitution. summations that “explained away” this engagement. These reactions
exposed that still the Left has inuence over political and intellectual insists that the lingua franca permits only words like secularism, Nehru,
space of our country. This very Left ideology being non-Bharatiya Marx whilst Hindutva is a pejorative. Should you deviate from this
obviously lacks dissent, liberty and tolerance. They discarded analysis language, then even the right to live is denied. You are not even worthy
and commented with farcical haste that Pranab Da had shown the RSS of being tolerated, let alone be engaged with. In Kerala the red bastion of
“a mirror” by speaking of secularism and Nehru on a RSS platform etc communist intolerance and a Stalinist enclave, from March 1965 till
etc May 2017, over 233 RSS workers have been killed for the only reason
However it is important to note that critics of Pranab Da’s visit to that they were working for RSS. Significantly, 60 percent of them were
Nagpur had nothing to say of Dr Bhagwat’s speech. It’s possible that ex- communists.
they didn’t hear his speech, maybe it wasn’t worth their time, after all As many times as you may try and explain the idea of Hindu Rashtra
this was in sync with their elitist definition of “free speech” – which and its true meaning, the communists and left leaning “intellectuals”
prescribes that all they say is correct and all else is false. We are right sans engagement and debate and will define it as only narrow, divisive
and you are wrong just on the lines of “Four legs good, Two legs bad’”, and exclusive. They will quote some old letters, or an article – cut, copy
the famous analogy used by George Orwell in his famous novel ’Animal paste and reproduce, without historical context or deliberation. They
Farm’ exposing the authoritarian tenets and hypocrisy of the will never see what the RSS leaders have been saying during these
communists. Hence listening to “two legs” would obviously be years till today. The reason is simple – “Two legs bad”!
blasphemy! However, just because they choose to look away and obfuscate at
The inclusiveness of “Vasundhara Parivar Hamara” (The song recited every given opportunity, the irrefutable fact remains that there are
before the speeches in Nagpur) includes everybody, even those who Muslims and Christians in the RSS. As Hindus we do not believe in
practice intolerance. But those who believe “four legs only are good” conversions, hence these Swayamevaks for years together keep
would prefer to reside in their darkness of ignorance. In all those following their religious practices as Christian or Muslim.
negative articles that followed, not one spoke of their own experience. In 1998 there was a 3 day camp of Vidharbha Prant ( a Part of
As to be in conversation with the RSS is considered blasphemous, and Maharashtra) where 30,000 Swayamsevanks participated in full
results in instant ostracisation amidst the “liberal left” (an oxymoron). uniform, stayed in tents. These camps normally take place only over
Under such pressure, paying heed to what the RSS Sarsanghachalak the weekend and for those who observe fast on Saturday, to make
says is not even an option. arrangements for special food the head count is taken. During the
A few months ago, I met with a Christian family from Agra and they exercise, it emerged that it happened to be the holy month of Ramzan as
asked a lot of straight forward questions about the RSS. I answered well and there were 122 Swayamsevaks who were keeping Rozas and
every one of those queries. They attended some RSS programs and needed to break their fast at late night. Accordingly, arrangements were
had a firsthand experience. Now when they meet a co-religionist who immediately made to facilitate this. Had there been no Ramzan, no one
claims that RSS is anti Christian, they pose three questions to them: would have noted that there were Muslims among Swayamsevaks in
• Is your opinion based on your own experience? the camp.

• Have you ever met with a Sangh functionary? These are stories drawn from real life experience, which do not make it
to the hallowed pages of mainstream publications, however if you
• Have you read any literature from the RSS? observe carefully and eschew the rhetoric that is peddled, the stark,
They invariably get answers in negation. During my routine tour when I intolerance and fascist approach to heterogeneity of ideas is clearly
was in Agra, this couple insisted that I should stay with them. They also visible and increasingly stands exposed.
arranged my meeting with the Bishop there. We went to Bishop’s office They say Pranab Da has shown the RSS a mirror, however the Sangh is
and the meeting went well. But we can’t expect such openness from the quite open to looking in the mirror and does so every year at the Chintan
Left inspired RSS haters. Shivirs and Pratinidhi Sabha!
There is a Marathi poem, that says: In these meetings a careful examination of the activities undertaken and
Those who are habituated to say “Yes” do not want to hear any ‘No” necessary course correction is deliberated upon. Such a meeting took
place as recently as the month of April in Pune. But when will left-
And those who are habituated to say “No” have no place for a “Yes” liberals who stake claim on the progressive values of inclusiveness but
In the same vein: In our “inclusion” of all we also include these display every aspect of intolerance in their actions – look in the mirror?
“intolerants”. Whether they choose to look in the mirror or not, their truth is reected
But in their (intolerant) tolerance they cannot tolerate we the in their actions and the public continues to take note of the rampant
“inclusive”. hypocrisy, between words and actions.
During his travels the Sarsanghchalak of RSS often meets inuential On a lighter note – one must express gratitude, had it not been for their
people from all walks of life. During one such interaction he met with a shrill display of intolerance, the media would not have turned the lens
famous industrialist, who suggested that in place of using the word on a program that is an annual event and always invites distinguished
“Hindu” the Sangh should use the word “Bharatiya”. guests as speakers. Thanks to the intolerance of communists and
To this Dr. Bhagwat replied, “For us, there isn’t much difference those inspired by their hollow rhetoric, the general public got to witness
between the two terms. However the term Bharat has a territorial a live transmission of the program. From the 1st to the 6th of June the
connotation while the term Hindu has a value based resonance”. This is official RSS website “Join RSS” received (average)378 requests per
the reason why Pakistan born Tarek Fateh, refers to himself as Hindu. day, however on the day of the program, there were 1779 requests.
Hence you can say Bharatiya and we can say Hindu. Some others may Need one say more?
say Indic, and we would understand that we are speaking of one and the
same thing. This is what is meant by: “Ekam Sat Vipra Bahudha
Vadanti”
But in the dogmatic and fascist world-view of communists these
values, so Bharatiya in their essence hold no significance. Their tribe Published in Indian Express
26th June 2018
Why Bharat needs to stay connected to its roots
A senior leader of the Congress recently said that if BJP returns to Dr. Radhakrishnan. Enumerating its distinctive features, he says:
power then India will become a “Hindu Pakistan”. “The Hindu method of reform enables every group to retain its past
Several leaders of the Congress party, perhaps supported by the associations and preserve its individuality and interest. As students are
evangelical Church and inuenced by the un-Indian ideology of proud of their colleges, so are a group of their gods. We need not move
Communism, continue to issue statements that hurt the very identity students from one college to another, but should do our best to raise the
and glory of Bharat. When these highly educated people make such tone of each college, improve its standards and refine its ideals, with
statements, one is reminded of the comment made in the report of the result that each college enables us to attain the same goal.”
education commission, by former President Dr. S. Radhakrishnan in He adds: “We see that the Hindu recognises one Supreme Spirit,
1949: “One of the serious complaints against the system of education though different names are given to it. In his social economy he has
which has prevailed in this country for over a century is that it neglected many castes, but one society. In terms of population there are many
India’s past, that it did not provide the Indian students with the races and tribes, but all are bound together by one common spirit.”
knowledge of their own culture. It has produced in some cases the
feeling that we are without roots, in others, what is worse, that our roots Gurudev Ravindranath Tagore also said the same thing in his essay
bind us to a world very different from that which surrounds us.” “Swadeshi Sam j”. He writes, “To feel unity in diversity, to establish
unity amongst variety -- this is the underlying dharma of Bharat. Bharat
Clearly, this un-Indianisation has gone so deep that it has inuenced our does not regard difference as hostility, she does not regard other as
thinking, even our vocabulary. Hindu Pakistan, Hindu Taliban, Hindu enemy. That is why without sacrifice or destruction she wants to
Terror – all these terms exhibit a completely un-Indian thought. In fact, accommodate everybody within one great system. That is why she
the expression “Hindu Pakistan” is a complete oxymoron. Before we accepts all ways and sees the greatness of each in his own sphere.
recognise the meaninglessness of this statement we should Because of this virtue in Bharat we shall not be frightened considering
understand what Bharat and Hindutva are. any society as our opponent. Each fresh conict will enable us to
Recently, speaking about Bharat in Nagpur, the former President Dr. expand ourselves. The Hindus, the Buddhist, the Muslim and the
Pranab Mukherjee said that “India was a state long before the concept Christian will not fight each other and die in India; here they will find a
of the European Nation State gained ground. This model of a defined meeting point. That point will not be non-Hindu, but very specifically
territory, a single language, shared religion and a common enemy… Hindu. However foreign may be her body parts, her life and spirit will be
led to the formation of various nation states in Europe. On the other of Bharat only.”
hand, Indian nationalism emanated from” universalism”, which finds Congress leaders forget that Pakistan was formed in denial of this
its roots in the Bharatiya philosophy of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam and liberal, all embracing, integral and holistic spiritual tradition. This is the
Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah, Sarve Santu Niramayah. We see the whole result of un-Indianisation through education and the inuence of un-
world as one family and pray for the happiness and good health of all. Indian ideologies like communism. As long as Bharat is embedded
Our national identity has emerged through a long drawn process of within Hindutva, it will never become Pakistan. It is only due to the
conuence, assimilation, and co-existence. The multiplicity in culture, rejection of Hindutva that Pakistan was born. The unity, independence
faith and language is what makes India special. We derive strength from and sovereignty of Bharat, is its existence “Astitva”, and the cultural and
not just tolerance but acceptance and respect. We accept and respect ideological heritage based upon spirituality of Bharat, is its identity
pluralism that forms the basis of our composite culture. We take pride “Asmita”. Due to petty political interest, leaders of the Congress are
and celebrate our diversity. These have been a part of our collective denying the very identity of Bharat. This is a matter of deep concern.
consciousnesses for centuries. Any attempt at defining our nationalism Don’t they realise that the denial of its inherent identity can threaten the
in terms of dogmas and identities of religion, region, hatred and very existence of Bharat?
intolerance, will only lead to dilution of our national Identity.”
The liberal Indian culture which celebrates diversity, and of which Dr
The foundation of this fundamentally liberal, all embracing, tolerant and Mukherjee spoke and which was called as “Hindu view of life” by Dr.
universal thought is the integral and holistic view of life based on Radhakrishnan and Rabindranath Tagore, was inherited even by
spirituality. . This view of life has been called the ‘Hindu view of Life” by
Pakistan. But it became Pakistan because it snapped ties with this rich eroding, then the narration starts changing. And so begins the narrative
heritage. If it reconnects itself to this heritage, then without leaving its that I am a Hindu but I am a Jain. I am a Jain but I am Shwetambar Jain. I
Muslim way of worship, it can remain Hindu. Innumerable people like am Shwetambar but I am a Sthanakavasi Jain and I am a Sthanakvasi
Sri M.C. Chagla, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam and the Pakistan born Canadian Jain but I belong to Tera Panthi.
resident Sri Tariq Fateh, while continuing to follow the Muslim faith, Further erosion of this deeper connect leads to a different narrative:
connected themselves with this heritage. In this way, even while whatever I may be – a Jain, a Swetambar, a Sthanakavasi or Tera Panthi
remaining Muslim, if Pakistan accepts this liberal and tolerant heritage, but I am not a Hindu. And then politics comes into play. Once the
then it will become “Hindu Pakistan”, in other words, it will become ultimate erosion of the deep connect to the roots, the core identity
‘Bharat’ . It can do this even while retaining its separate political identity. (Asmita), is complete, the process of de-Indianisation also is
Bharat deep cultural roots are its identity. Remaining connected to complete. Slogans like “Bharat tere tukde honge, Bharat ki barbadi tak
these roots, embedded in our identity (Asmita), is essential to our jung chalegi, jung chalegi”, are the outcome of this complete
existence (Astitva). This identity has been called Hindutva or Hindu disconnect with the roots of Bharat. Such expressions do not emanate
view of life by Dr. Radhakrishnan and Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore. If from illiterate, backward and poor people, but from by ultramodern
anyone has objection to the word ‘Hindu’, then they may call it young representatives of the Bharatiya intellectual community,
Bharatiya or even Indic. But its core content remains the same. Even representing the so-called ‘most progressive and modern’ educational
though the truth is one, it can be called by different names; that is the institution. Surprisingly, they also get support from academicians and
essence of Bharatiya thought. It is the content that is vital and scholars who are drawing perks and benefits from the resources of the
important. same country. Can there be a more glaring example of de-Indianisation
How does one think if one is deeply embedded to Bharatiya cultural- through education?
spiritual tradition? A good example comes from the saying of Acharya Therefore, Dr. Pranab Mukherjee tracing the legacy of over five
Mahaprajna ji. He was the head of the Tera Panth (a sect), which is one thousand years of togetherness and collective journey of the people of
of the spiritual traditions among Shwetambara Jains. Being a saint with Bharat – he did this during his speech in Nagpur -- that formed our
national perspective, he was recognised and respected far and wide. national identity, becomes all the more important. We can protect this
He used to say, I belong to the Tera Panth because I am a Sthanakavasi identity in the world and prepare ourselves for future challenges only if
Jain. I am a Sthanakavasi Jain because I am a Shwetambara Jain. I am we remain connected and embedded to our roots. To conclude in the
Shwetambara because I am a Jain and I am a Jain because I am a words of the well known poet, Sri Prasoon Joshi:
Hindu. This is a beautiful expression of the Bharatiya way. One can Why are you so disconnected, shallow tree?
simultaneously belong to the Tera Panth, be a Sthanakavasi Jain, a
Shwetambara Jain and also be a Hindu. This is because Bharatiya You will only wither away.
thought does not see any contradiction in these diverse layers of The deeper your roots go,
identities. It is only a different expression of the One. This is the
Bharatiya tradition. But when the connect to these deeper roots starts So much will you bloom!

Published in Hindustan Times

8August 2018
Response
 Secularism

Communal
Mind Set

Those claiming to be die-hard secularists

behave like die-hard communal people
On the perception that RSS is a Brahmin-led organisation On whether Article 370 should be scrapped in Kashmir
It is a wrong impression, a politically motivated allegation. People The Constitution itself states Article 370 is a ‘temporary and transient
associated with the Sangh do not think and feel so. We have all sections provision’ for J&K. It should be relooked at and assessed whether J&K
of Hindu society leading the RSS movement at different levels from the has benefited from this provision and if it needs to be continued. But an
grassroots to national. When we say that we want to organise the Hindu objective re-look is being opposed by vested interests, and this is
society, it includes everybody, including the Scheduled Castes. The worrisome.
RSS has worked towards this goal since its inception. Since 1983, On caste-based reservations
special emphasis was given to enhance harmony, samarasata, within
the Hindu society by devising initiatives and creating platforms to Unfortunately, a section of the Hindu society was deprived because of
increase the interaction between the Scheduled Castes and others, to caste. They need affirmative actions like reservation to empower them
strengthen the bond of oneness. and bring them at par with the rest.

On farmer distress and the recent deaths in police firing On Rahul Gandhi studying Upanishads and the Gita

Farmer suicides are unfortunate and a result of decades of gross It is important to read the Gita and Upanishads to understand Bharat. It
neglect by ruling parties and their awed policies. It needs a focused and is good that of late Rahul Gandhi has felt the need to read the ancient
holistic intervention and this will take some time. The present scriptures. We are happy that the RSS has provoked him to read the
government is working towards this and we are confident things will great scriptures of Bharat. One should always understand Bharat
improve. before speaking about Bharat.

On violence by gau rakshaks

Published in Economic Times
No one should take the law into one’s hands. They can work as vigilante
groups to help the government implement the rule of law.
11 June 2017
It is not our job to assess the performance of the government. Our job is
character-building and nation-building.
On whether the BJP-led government is doing enough to spread the
Sangh ideology
The Sangh does not work through state power nor for state power. We
work directly in the society, for the society and with the support of the
society. The BJP has its own goals. They should try to implement their
manifesto. Swayamsevaks work in all spheres of life through various
organisations. To improve coordination, we have “sampark adhikari”
for each organisation, BJP being one of them.
On secularism
We have no problem with secularism per se but it has been misused in
Bharat to foment communal forces. Anyone claiming to be a die-hard
secularist is seen behaving like a die-hard communal person. In Bharat,
for ages, the state has always been secular, treating all religions
equally.
Nothing anti-India should be tolerated
Ever since the BJP came to power in New Delhi, the RSS is being false and baseless premise. The BJP is a party with an ideology that
dragged into every controversy, from the JNU issue to a student's reects in its manifesto that they had made public before the 2014
suicide in the University of Hyderabad. Political leaders such as elections, saying what they will do if voted to power. Now that the
Rahul Gandhi and student leaders of JNU all accuse the RSS of people have voted them to power, they are implementing their
having a hidden agenda that they say is being carried out by the manifesto. Let them fulfil the promises they made to the people.
ABVP and the Central government. How do you respond to these The khaki shorts and white shirt ganavesh (uniform) has been the
allegations? identity of the Sangh for a long time. Reports hint that a new uniform
The Congress, the Left parties and their leaders, even when they were that is more contemporary is under consideration. Could you please
in power, were consistently opposing and defaming the RSS over elaborate on this?
frivolous and false premise. Whenever they were in trouble they would Actually, selfess service and discipline is the identity of the Sangh
blame the RSS now and then. But the people of Bharat began to see swayamsevaks, and they have been exhibiting it whether they are in
through their lies and stopped believing them. There is nothing new uniform or not in uniform. And they will continue to exhibit the same (its
about it. All these allegations are unfounded and false. core identity) even in the new uniform, if it gets changed.
When the ministry of human resource development instructed all Regarding the JNU issue, do you think there should be zero-
Central university campuses to fly the national flag , the political tolerance towards anti-India sloganeering or should we bring such
stand adopted by its critics was to ask if the RSS flew the Tricolour in fringe groups into the national mainstream by reaching out to them
its office. What do you have to say to this? proactively? How do you view the whole controversy and the
To y the national ag compulsorily in government-funded institutions government's response to it?
is purely the government's decision. Where does the RSS come into the Nothing anti-India should be tolerated. One should differentiate
picture? The national ag, by the way, has been hoisted on between anti-India and anti-government. There should be a process of
Independence Day and Republic Day at the RSS headquarters by its dialogue, addressing the grievances and attempting to change the
senior functionaries. mind. But talking about this particular case/instance, it is not just
Does the RSS feel it is better to reach out to people directly through sloganeering. It is the mindset that is consistently nurtured that leads to
its new outreach programmes, like the IT Milans aimed at the new committing violence, or condoning violence, or supporting violence
generation, than by replying to political allegations? and anti-national activities.
The people of Bharat are aware of the lie behind such political What are the main topics that would come up at the Akhil Bharatiya
allegations. They know the RSS through the discipline and service of Pratinidhi Sabha (ABPS) in Nagaur in March?
the swayamsevaks. As a result, people's admiration, support and trust The ABPS is our largest policy-making body that meets once annually,
in the RSS is consistently growing. The RSS has been working to every March. This time, the ABPS will meet on March 11 -13 at Nagaur
organise the entire society on the basis of a national character and in Rajasthan. An annual report of the organisational activities and
discipline. Reaching out to all sections of society is a natural process of achievements will be presented by sar karyavah (general secretary).
this mission. This has been going on since 1925. IT Milans began due Participants will share some of their new experiments, experiences,
to the emergence and specificities of the IT field. What has it got to do initiatives and observations. Annual planning for the coming year will
with political allegations? also be discussed. From mid-April to June-end, there will be annual
You have clarified that the Sangh wants to bring change through summer training camps (around 70 camps) of 20 days' duration
social work and not through government. But ever since this throughout the country. Detailed discussions about the planning of
government has come to power, critics have been accusing the RSS these camps will be held there. Along with discussing the present
of implementing its ideological agenda through the ministries of national scenario, some resolutions will also be taken up for discussion
HRD and culture. How would you like to respond to these critics? at the ABPS.
In your question itself you have answered it all. When you describe
Published in Economic Times
them as critics of the RSS, they are bound to criticise the RSS even on
28 Feb 2016
Vision
The fundamental elements of Hindutva: Satya, Swattva and Sattva
Once a II year college student while introducing himself said he writes combination -through control and subjugation of matter, air, water,
short stories. What kind of short stories? I asked. He narrated a time, distance and so on. Yet, the keynote has been the shift from
recently written story. Those were election days. Obviously, the subject harmony to highhandedness from awe and reverence to petulance &
he chose was election. The story goes: arrogance. If man-nature alienation has been the chief cause of
The elections were declared in a state and four candidates filed their unethicality towards ecology and environment, this same alienative
nominations. The candidates were Air pollution, Soil pollution, Water ethos began to evade all dimensions of human society. This process
pollution and Food pollution. Interestingly all of them insisted on the leads to a gradual weakening of ethical sentiments, which are seen to
same election symbol “Human Being”. Electoral officials were puzzled. be soft and fuzzy. Not only has nature come to be treated as a resource,
Why would they want the same symbol? Logically it could be given to as a means, but man too unethically emerges as an inherent property of
only one of them. They were summoned to discuss the issue with the this clever techno-centric outlook.
electoral official. The official explained his predicament to them. To find From tool to machine to automation to chip- this progression seems to
the way out he said the candidates will have to justify as to why they have made the human race increasingly less human.
deserve the symbol? The most convincing answer will win the symbol. Because of this attitude man is getting distanced and detached not only
Others will have to choose different symbols. Every candidate put forth from nature but also from society and fellowmen. Hence, he is
the same argument. Every one said he is grateful to the human being as becoming more arrogant, more cruel and more violent in his dealing
it is this very human being that has created, nourished and developed with surrounding nature, aliens and fellow-beings. And the societies
him. The human being is the root and cause of his existence. Therefore that hold this mindset, are the (so called) ‘developed, modern’
he only deserves it. societies and human communities.
It is such a heart-rending truth that the story unfolds so easily. Today Considering the roots, lineage, insufficient knowledge and
not only the entire mankind but also the mother earth is getting comparatively minimal experience of life of this” progressive
diabolically devoured by the problems of air, land, water, food pollution developed” society, it can be comprehended that their inferences are
and the consequent Global Warming. incorrect, incomplete and incongruent. But their tendency to shout
It is, therefore, a matter of great concern to all of us. The irony is that the from the roof top that, “Only We have realized the ultimate truth and only
societies who are at the root of this are not uneducated, undeveloped We own it”, especially when they have achieved or known only a little or
and backward but contrary to that they are (so called) highly developed, partial indicates sheer immaturity.”
advanced, educated and modern one. In spite of this, why did this Sai Makarand Dave Notes:
happen? The reason is, they have now realized, that this (so-called)
modern, developed human civilization’s outlook towards nature, “In our Puranas we have, a story about the birth of “Arun” the charioteer
mankind, and rather entire life was fractured, incorrect and incomplete. of Lord Sun. Kashyap Muni, the sage, had two wives: Kadru and Vinata.
Due to this in the name of progress, they started racing, with great Kadru bore many serpents.Vinata laid two eggs. Vinata was told, after a
speed towards destruction rather than development. prolonged period two luminous and valiant sons would be born out of
the eggs. Since nothing happened for quite sometime, she broke one
Mr S.K. Chakraborty notes: egg. A premature baby “Arun” was born. At an appropriate time, a
“The march of modern science & technology derived from it, coincided luminous and most valiant Garuda was born from the other egg. Arun
with an era when the human race was beginning to snap its ties of cursed his mother for taking him out of the egg prematurely. Garuda
personal feeling level relationship with earth and nature. freed Vinata from this spell.
One need not stop for a moment to consider the right or wrong of any “Arun” symbolizes brightness of premature light. It is a situation in life
action regarding something to which there is no relatedness. No doubt of mankind when the darkness of ignorance has not vanished
numerous aspects of external physical life benefited from the sci-tech completely and the sunrise of revelation has not totally appeared on the
horizon. If a man impatiently begins to believe that he has achieved society and has significantly inuenced the rest of the world. This
everything, when he is yet to see the full luminance of divine light, and paradigm consists of number of entrenched ideas and values, among
realize spiritual blessings, then it is possible that he may be reverted them the view of the Universe as a mechanical system composed of
back to confinement instead of experiencing liberation. Therefore, elementary blocks, view of human body as a machine, the view of life in
dawn ( Arunodaya) is the time for serene, deep contemplation. It is a society as competitive struggle for existence, belief in unlimited
moment of quiet and composed rumination. It is not the time to dance material, economic and technological growth, and last not the least- the
around in ecstasy of “I have achieved everything in life”. Thus at this belief that a society in which the female is every where subsumed
juncture, if one starts hopping and shouting from one’s roof top with under the male is one that follows a basic law of nature. These entire
self-complacency that “I have realized the ultimate truth”,then he will assumptions have been fatefully challenged by recent events. And
be in the same plight as that of “Arun”. Either he will fall into the, pit of indeed a radical revision of them is occurring.”
illusion or he will completely lead people into entirely wrong direction. “ “The new paradigm may be called a holistic world view, seeing the
The (so called) “progressive-developed” societies or nations which, in world as an integrated whole rather than a dissociated collection of
spite of not having found the whole truth-having just the glimpse of it- parts. It may also be called an ecological view, if the term ecological is
and yet bragging and foisting upon the world that “they” have found the used in much broader and deeper sense than usual. Deep ecological
ultimate truth, remind us of half grown, under grown ‘Arun’. awareness recognizes the fundamental interdependence of all
This attitude of the front liners of these “progressive societies” can still phenomena and the fact that as individuals and societies we are all
be understood. But the enormity of the issue is their obstinacy and embedded in (and ultimately depend on) the cyclic process of nature.
vehemence towards their insistence that their incomplete and incorrect Ultimately, deep ecological awareness is spiritual or religious
doctrine is the ultimate truth and has to be universally accepted. The awareness. When the concept of the human spirit understood as the
obstinacy regarding their social, political, economic, religious and mode of consciousness in which the individual feels a sense of
related systems emerging out on the basis of this incomplete partial belonging, of connectedness, to the cosmos as a whole, it becomes
truth and justifying the required oppression, violence and conicts to clear that ecological awareness is spiritual in its deepest essence. It is,
make it universally accepted and establish their hegemony is the real therefore, not surprising that the emerging new vision of reality based
issue. on deep ecological awareness is consistent with the so called perennial
Winin Pereira and Jeremy Seabrook note: philosophy of spiritual traditions.”

“The Western technological and scientific system that developed in SATYA : The Reality
symbiosis with its colonial expansion underpinned and made more Now this new alternative paradigm that is coming forth is the same that
efficient the process of expropriation. The unsustainability and injustice the Indian (Hindu) visionaries and thinkers propounded thousands of
of this project can now be seen, though at the time of the “discovery” of years ago.
distant lands and new trade routes, neither moral nor ecological limits The salient features of this age old paradigm are :
to the accumulation of wealth occurred to them, mainly as a result of
the cultural imperatives embedded in the fabric of European society. The same One Divinity is present everywhere, be it living or non-living.
It has manifested itself in many forms. Hence apparently diverse forms
The West now claims the moral high ground as it castigates other are inherently one and the same. Unity in diversity. Oneness in
countries for their failings in human rights, for their inability to control multiplicity
population growth, for their corruption and mismanagement. But the
West has attained its apparent pre-eminence only after passing through Eeshaavaasyam Idam Sarvam Yatkincha Jagatyaam Jagat I
brutal and merciless phases of human rights abuse, the widespread Reality is one but is known by various attributes. It can be achieved
practice of tyranny and genocide, slavery and colonialism. Without the through various ways, some close, some far, some twisted, some
exploitation of occupied territories, the Industrial Revolution would straight.
have been aborted before takeoff. The West’s enormous structure of Ekam Sat Vipraah Bahudhaa Vadanti I
afuence has been constructed upon the sands of unsustainability and
injustice". This creation is one live organic unit which is mutually connected.
There is mutual coherence, not conict. Everything is offsprings
(It should be noted that the term”West” does not refer solely to any complementary.
geographical region, neither does it include all the people there. It refers
mainly to the agents of Western-style development, in the West or Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam I
elsewhere, particularly the TNCs, the politicians and academics. Their The nature is form of Motherhood and we are her children. The Earth is
beneficiaries encompass much of the populations of the West, our mother and we are it’s offsprings. Therefore, milking the nature is
knowingly or unwittingly, with the exception of perhaps the appropriate, but exploitation is not.
impoverished.)” Maataa Bhoomih Putroham Pruthivyaah I
By following the above agenda have these “progressive-developed- Earning wealth and enjoying sensual desires are the principle objects of
modern” societies been able to solve all of their problems? No. That’s human endeavor and should be pursued by righteous ways according
not even in sight. In spite of all round prosperity and afuence of all to ‘Dharma’. However by limiting our needs and wants, one should lead
kinds, there is no peace, happiness, contentment. The mind is in a simple and disciplined life. The residual wealth and efforts should be
turmoil. They are experiencing the heat of its social, familial and used for the welfare of the society and mankind.
psychological adverse outcome. But they are unable to find the way
out. Because their very conception of universe, nature, society, and Tena Tyaktena Bhunjeethaah I
human being is incomplete, distorted, superficial and incorrect. Divinity is omnipresent, whether animate or inanimate. It is more
Fritjof Capra notes: prominently manifested in the human being. This divinity within can be
manifested completely by one’s own efforts. It can be done by
“The paradigm that is now receding has dominated our culture for controlling nature internal and external to become “free”. Revealing the
several hundred years. During which it has shaped our modern western omnipresent divinity and being “free” is the ultimate goal of human life
and pursuit. This spirituality is the basic foundation and essence of members can adhere to different forms of worship.
social systems, dispositions and human life. Rucheenaam Vaichitryaat Riju Kutila Naanaa Pathajushaam I
Vayam Amrutasya Putraah I Nrunaameko Gamyastvamasi Payasaamarnava Iva II
Man and woman are complimentary to each other. Both are equally Worshipping female form of divinity, Goddess as a symbol of “Shakti”.
important and responsible for betterment of the society. Both have There have been women contributors of Vedic hymns that speak of,
equal right and opportunity to evolve spiritually and get liberated. mundane and spiritual knowledge and wisdom.
Based on this Hindu or Indian world-view, highly advanced, educated, Man and woman are complementary to each other. One is incomplete
cultured, afuent life, individual as well as social, prospered here since without other. To perform any religious ritual, wife is inevitable
thousands of years. Many foreign travelers have noted and recorded companion by the side of the performing husband. Highest and
this. Hindus (Indians) were the first to reveal, comprehend, understand ultimate gratitude is expressed by revering in the form of “Mother”.
this mystery of creation and life and hence is known as “Hindu World-
view”. Hindus are naturally pleased and proud to see that the modern Gomaataa, Bhoomaataa, Lokamaataa(river), Tulasi Maataa .
Western world has started to reveal, accept and appreciate this “Satya” Rebirth and Karma Siddhaant.
or reality, this view of life. Unique concepts of Pilgrimage, Punya, Dharma.
SWATTVA : Self Expression Considering every woman (except one’s wife) in the form of mother.
In the light of this holistic, organic, connected, spiritual world-view a Maatruvat Paradaareshu, Paradravyeshu Loshtavat I
way of life was created, developed and established here since ages. To
follow, establish and practice this world-view in individual and social Aatmavat Sarvabhooteshu, Esha Dharmah Sanaatanah II
life policies, systems and life-values were created. To propagate and One should take food only after feeding the birds and animals in near
establish this value system many people have staked their entire life surrounding.
and performed penance, thus creating ideals in the society. As a sum SATTVA : Core Strength
total of this a unique culture-Hindu culture-got evolved here. To share
this view and way of life, the sages, saints, cultural ambassadors went India- the abode of Hinduism-has a role to perform to help the Hindus-
throughout the world with the sole intention of enlightening the people spread all over the world-protect self identity, self expression
all over. The affection, love, compassion, patience, approach and ways (Swattva). This role is in augmenting its core strength (Sattva or
adopted by these cultural ambassadors to disseminate their knowledge essence). This “Sattva” lies in:
and share their experience are the salient features of Hindu culture. India being militarily strong and invincible. It has been a universal
Nowhere, never coercion, force and violence were adopted by experience till date that if any nation in the world grew in its military
anybody. This culture has become the identity, the expression, the soul strength it utilizes its power for invading other nations, fighting wars to
(Swattva) of Hindu society. If one desires to have a world living together expand their territory, exploit or plunder. India is the only honorable
in peace, free from conicts, with mutual understanding and exception which never used her strength to extend her boundaries.
cooperation, with harmony among the diverse people, sustaining the India did fight wars but only in self defence, for cultural protection and
ecological balance one has to resort to this holistic, organic, to establish righteous social order (Dharma). That is why Shri Ram and
interconnected, spiritual view and way of life or Hindu view of life. Shri Krishna are ideals and apostles of Indians. They fought and won
Hence, it is the paramount duty of the Hindus spread all over the world wars but not for territorial expansions.
to protect, nourish and nurture this Hindu way of life, their own India being economically prosperous and self-reliant. We may surely
expression(Swattva) by putting it in regular practice and present a live undertake trade and business with the world around but not at the cost
example of the “global and noble” culture. of our self-reliance.
Salient features of Hindu Culture: The purpose and content of our school and university education being
Mother, Father, Teacher and Guest should be revered and treated as based on Bharatiya philosophy that reects our soul. New ideas and
Godly personalities. achievements around the world shall be welcome if they stand true to
the test of our extensive, rich experience.
Maatru Devo bhava I Pitru Devo Bhava I Aachaarya Devo Bhava I
Atithi Devo Bhava I Our social systems being founded on our holistic, spiritual,
interconnected Hindu vision where standard of life is not determined by
Personal gains can be relinquished for the sake of family; family’s gains economic parameters only but on the basis of one’s life values and
for the sake of town; town’s interests for the sake of country and quality in life.
everything can be renounced for the freedom of the soul.
In establishing a social value system promoting simple living, moderate
Tyajedekam Kulasyaarthe, Gramsyaarthe Kulam Tyajet I spending and relinquishment in spite of an abundance of resources.
Graamam Janapadasyaarthe, Aatmaarthe Prithiveem Tyajet II Having socio-centric multi-power centered social systems instead of
Worshipping land, water, light, trees, Sun, Moon as divine politico-centric mono-power centered social systems,
manifestations and worshipping machines, tools, weapons, deity of The augmentation or strengthening of Hindu’s “Sattva” shall help
our home with a feeling of larger connectedness. protect Hindu’s “Swattva”, facilitating the inuence of Hindu holistic
To spend for the betterment of others is a great virtue. One who world-view (Satya) bringing happiness and betterment of each and all
sacrifices his self interest is elevated. throughout the world.
To work, toil, spend, share for the betterment of others in the society is
‘Dharma’ and is virtuous.
Variety of religions from worshipping formless Almighty to a God with a
specific form all lead to the same realization. Even in one family the
Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah Sarve Santu Niraanyaah I Sai Makarand Dave: Sooryani Aamantran Patrika, Arunnu Aagaman
Sarve Bhadraani Pashyantu Maa Kashchit Duhkhamaapnuyaat II (Gujarati), P.16

References: Winin Pereira and Jeremy Seabrook : Global Parasites, Preface

S. K.Chakraborti: Rising Technology and Falling Ethics?; Journal of Fritjoff Capra : The Web of Life, P.6,7
Human Values 3:1(1997), P.104
This ebook is designed
and published by