Oil & Gas Property Acquisition
Oil & Gas Property Acquisition
Oil & Gas Property Acquisition
ECONOMICS
T':~5': ::-::~'~~
.1 " '
who view this with alarm, believing it to be a trend toward compared with a straight cash purchase, often are v~ry
the elimination of the independent operator. Others see substantial. In a straight cash deal, the buyer must retIre
it as merely a logical outgrowth of current economic con- the entire investment out of after-tax income; with ABC
ditions and the realities of our present tax laws. financing, he has a much smaller net investment and no
tax liability for the income which finances most of the
There is little need to underscore the current depressed
total consideration. His average return is increased cor-
status of the petroleum industry and the many problems
respondingly, and the over-all rate of return or "leverage"
this has created. World-wide imbalance of supply and de-
usually is several times greater. For a stated average return
mand during a period of increasing costs has sharply re-
on investment, the availability of ABC financing usually
duced cash flow and profits. Consolidation of operating
results in a substantially higher total consideration to the
units and elimination of less profitable investments have
seller than the buyer could afford to pay with a straight
occurred throughout most companies, large and small.
cash purchase. This, of course, has not escaped the atten-
It is an economic fact of life that the independent pro- tion of operators who have properties for sale. Asking
ducer can neither expand nor maintain his competitive prices for desirable production have increased sharply,
position unless he offsets most of his income-tax liability especially during the last five years. Most sellers now ask
with profitable drilling. Many independents now find this for - and receive - prices which include substantial
difficult or impossible to accomplish because of reduced values for undeveloped reserves, future waterflood possibil-
cash flow resulting from low allowables. The alternatives ities and other "plus" factors which would not have been
are gradual liquidation or a capital gain sale of assets. On considered previously. Increased prices also are indicative
the other hand, many petroleum economists are satisfied of the fact that the demand for high-quality production now
that reserves in the ground can be replaced at lower in- exceeds the available supply, with more companies and
cremental cost by outright purchase than by exploratory groups competing. A trend toward competitive bidding has
drilling. Whether this generally is true is not so important started which seems certain to be followed hereafter in the
as the fact that many companies are acting on this premise. larger deals.
Original manuscript rectived in Society of Petroleum Engineers office Many companies actively seeking production to buy
.Jan. 14, 1961. Revised manuscript received April 14. 1961. Paper pr~ have created special departments whose sole purpose is to
,ented at 9lst Annual Meeting of AIME. Feb. 26-March 2. 1961, In
St. Louis. locate and negotiate for properties. Some also provide
SPE 3
JUNE, 1961 527
special training to their cngineers, geologists and landmen, with other operators or the acquisition of other interests
in order that they can recognize any special situation to consolidate ownership. Analysis of future secondary
which might result in a profitable acquisition. A number recovery possibilities will disclose where properties or
of new companies and groups of investors have been or- interests might be acquired to facilitate those operations
ganized for the specific purpose of achieving growth or to simplify the formation of units.
through property acquisition, and some of them have been After a decision has been made to attempt to buy pro-
remarkably successful. The seller of choice production no duction in an area, a preliminary analysis should be made
longer needs to seek out a buyer; now it is the buyer who of the producing fields to determine which would be of
must find the deal before some other group is aware of its specific interest. A number of factors will need to be con-
existence. sidered, including: (1) average reserves, allowable rates,
It seems appropriate here to ask what should be the market outlets, possibilities for additional development or
basic objectives of any aggressive program of property secondary recovery, and other factors which will affect
acquisition. Other than the obvious profit motive, there future income; (2) special operating problems and the ex-
appear to be only two logical goals which would justify this perience of present manpower to handle them effectively;
activity - long-range growth and reduction of incremental and (3) the extent of ownership by independents. Most of
costs. There seems to be little point, for example, for a this information can be determined by reviewing ownership
producer whose entire operations are in the Permian Basin maps, allowable schedules, scout data, commercially avail-
to spend money and time attempting to buy small interests able well logs and production records, and published
in Illinois or California. Similarly, a small company which reference data.
has neither adequate working capital nor a large operating There is no assurance that any of the analytical work
staff should not attempt to compete for a $100 million just outlined will turn up useful leads about properties
deal. A company whose current production averages 25 which can be purchased. It always is possible to approach
B/D/well at an average direct lifting cost of 40¢/gross bbl individual operators with an offer to buy for a stipulated
should not dilute its averages by acquiring high-cost strip- price per unit of reserves, based on a report by a mutually
per production unless there is some compelling reason for acceptable consultant and further subject to financing. This
doing so. These examples are not uncommon, and they em- approach usually is unsatisfactory because the offer is not
phasize the point that some companies do not have a long- definite enough to secure an option for enough time to
range program to which their acquisition program is work out the transaction. Usually it will be more ad-
geared. To many prospective purchasers the only consid- vantageous to find out, in advance of any contact, whether
eration is whether a deal can be financed, not whether it any of the operators in the field might be receptive to an
fits in with or improves the average quality of their cur- offer.
rent operations. Aggressive, widespread activity in search of
production to buy is a time-consuming and expensive opera- Factors Causing Forced Sales
tion, requiring specialized engineering and legal talent. It
A review of a large number of oil and gas property
also has the effect of driving up prices for desirable produc-
transactions which have occurred during the last five years
tion, often beyond the point where a reasonable profit can
discloses a limited number of circumstances, or combina-
be realized.
tions of circumstances, which induced the owners to sell.
Brief summaries follow.
Information Required for Program Analysis
1. Estate Problems--The death of a principal created
There are many practical difficulties in designing an estate tax liabilities requiring partial or total liquidation.
effective program of property acquisition, but a logical 2. Retirement-The owner was of advanced age and sold
starting point is a complete analysis of the company's out to create an estate for his heirs.
current operations. This study should provide at least the 3. Dispute Between Co-owners-This has resulted in
following information for each operating district or area. dissolution of partnerships or small corporations, which
1. Current utilization of present administrative, technical resulted in liquidation.
and field personnel to determine where and to what extent 4. Investor Groups-Groups of investors made capital
additional operations can be added for maximum efficiency. gains sales after their properties were fully developed or
2. Proved developed reserves and direct operating and paid out to avoid high individual income taxes on their
administrative expenses, both current and future. production.
3. A tabulation of uneconomic or marginal properties, 5. Excessive Overhead - Stockholders or co-owners
their potential value for secondary recovery operation and forced a sale of assets to displace high cost or ineffective
recommendations for their retention or disposal. management.
4. Available undeveloped acreage, both proved and 6. Debt Liquidation-Properties were sold to provide
wildcat, and the cost and expected timing of future drilling. funds to payoff debts.
5. A list of joint-interest leases, including the various 7. Consolidation-Properties isolated from major opera-
owners of the working interest and an analysis of the ad- tions, or operated minority interests, were sold to reduce
ditional cost of profit resulting from diversified ownership. operating or overhead expense.
A survey of this type will disclose areas where opera- 8. Working Capital-Owner sold some properties to
tions should be expanded or curtailed, along with other generate funds needed for the development of others, or
valuable information on operating efficiency, quality and to provide working capital for other purposes.
longevity of reserves, and future development possibilities. 9. Inadequate Market-Company was unable to develop
Management then can pinpoint areas where additional adequate market through trade-outs of crude or did not
production should be acquired for maximum effective use want to wait for future gas outlet.
of manpower and reduction of average costs. Detailed in- 10. Loss of Growth Potential-Company was in gradual
formation on marginal operations, splinter interests and liquidation due to inactive management, reduced cash flow,
isolated properties will suggest possibilities for trade-outs inadequate financing, or other circumstances.