Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activity of Ludwigia Octovalvis On
Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activity of Ludwigia Octovalvis On
Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activity of Ludwigia Octovalvis On
ISSN 1818-4952
© IDOSI Publications, 2012
School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Minden, Penang, Malaysia
Abstract: Ludwigia octovalvis (Jacq.) P. H. Raven (Family: Onagraceae) is traditionally used to treat skin
diseases, diarrhea and flatulence. This study assayed twelve extracts of L. octovalvis for their total phenolic
content (TPC), antioxidant and antibacterial activity. The highest TPC at 264.76 ± 0.23 GAE mg/g dry weight
and antioxidant activity (evaluated by 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl and ferric reducing antioxidant power
assays) at 1080.84 ± 6.07 µM TE/mg dry weight and 1256.88 ± 5.38 µM TE/mg dry weight, respectively, were
detected in 80% methanol extract of the leaf. A strong correlation between TPC and antioxidant activities of
both assays was observed (r > 0.98). Eighty percent methanol extract of the leaf gave the lowest minimum
inhibitory concentration (MIC, 62.5 µg/mL) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC, 125.0 µg/mL) against
Escherichia coli O157:H7, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Bacillus spizizenii (ATCC 6633), while 80%
methanol extract of the root gave similar MIC and MBC values against Pseudomonas aeruginosa
(ATCC 27853). Our findings suggest that leaf of L. octovalvis as a possible new source of natural mixture of
antioxidant and anti-E. coli O157:H7.
Key words: E. coli O157:H7 Ludwigia octovalvis Total phenolic DPPH FRAP
Corresponding Author: Abd M. Uyub, School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800,
USM, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia. Tel: +604-6534002, Fax: +604-6565125, E-mail: uyub@usm.my.
22
World Appl. Sci. J., 16 (1): 22-29, 2012
23
World Appl. Sci. J., 16 (1): 22-29, 2012
24
World Appl. Sci. J., 16 (1): 22-29, 2012
25
World Appl. Sci. J., 16 (1): 22-29, 2012
Table 2: Antibacterial activities of extracts of Ludwigia octovalvis based on disc diffusion assay
Bacteria Diameter of inhibition zone (mm)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leaf Stem Root Antibiotics
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ------------------------------------------
Gram-positive Methanol Ethyl- acetate Chloroform n-Hexane Methanol Methanol Chloramphenicol Doxycycline
B. cereus 10.8±0.8b 7.2±0.4a x x
7.6±0.8a 10.0±0.6b 17.5±0.3fg 16.5±0.5f
B. licheniformis 12.2±1.2c 8.4±0.5a x x
9.7±0.6b x
15.2±0.8e 22.2±0.3i
B. spizizenii 14.0±0.8de 7.0±0.5a x x
10.2±0.3b 12.2±1.3c 24.0±0.4i 27.1±0.3j
Staph. aureus 7.8±1.7a 9.2±1.2b 7.3±0.4a 7.0±0.0a 7.0±0.6a 10.5±0.7b 17.4±0.6f 19.4±0.6h
Staph.epidermidis 17.8±1.2fg 9.5±0.5b 8.3±0.5a 7.0±0.0a 11.3±1.0c 10.0±0.5b 20.0±0.5h 13.5±0.5cd
Strep. mutans 15.3±1.6e 9.1±1.2b 8.0±0.4a 7.4±0.3a 11.4±0.8c 10.2±0.8b 18.0±0.0fg 22.0±0.4i
Gram negative
E. coli O157H7 12.0±0.4c 10.6±0.5b 9.5±1.5b 7.0±0.0a x x
15.8±1.2e 14.7±0.8e
E. coli ATCC 14.8±0.8e 11.0±1.8c 9.0±0.5b 8.2±1.3a 10.3±0.6b 10.6±0.7b 20.6±2.2h 16.6±0.5f
Kl. pneumoniae x x x x x
8.8±0.5a 18.4±1.7g 15.4±0.8f
Ps.aeruginosa 9.8±1.4b 8.0±1.0a 7.6±0.1a 7.0±0.0a 8.2±0.2a 14.2±1.4e 16.4±1.5f 18.4±0.5g
Ps. Stutzeri 15.7±1.1e 13.2±0.8cd 10.7±1.1b 9.3±0.8b 11.3±0.8c 7.7±1.0a 12.9±1.5cd 11.9±0.4c
Sh. Boydii 8.0±0.8a 9.4±0.3b 9.0±0.0b 8.7±1.0a 7.0±0.0a 10.2±0.8b 17.0±0.2f 18.0±0.2g
Values are means of three replicates ± standard deviation. Values with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA
and post hoc least-significant difference (LSD) test. xno inhibition
Table 3: Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of 80% methanol extracts of Ludwigia octovalvis
Bacteria MIC and MBC values (µg/mL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leaf Stem Root Chloramphenicol Doxycycline
-------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- --------------------- -------------------------
Gram-positive MIC MBC MIC MBC MIC MBC MIC MBC MIC MBC
B. cereus 125.0 250.0 500.0 1000.0 125.0 250.0 15.60 31.25 15.60 31.25
B. licheniformis 500.0 1000.0 250.0 500.0 >1000 >1000 15.60 31.25 15.60 31.25
B. spizizenii 62.5 125.0 500.0 1000.0 125.0 500.0 7.80 15.60 7.80 15.60
S. aureus 500.0 1000.0 1000.0 >1000 250.0 1000.0 15.60 31.25 15.60 31.25
S. epidermidis 250.0 500.0 125.0 250.0 250.0 500.0 7.80 15.60 31.25 62.50
S. mutans 125.0 500.0 125.0 250.0 125.0 250.0 15.60 31.25 7.80 15.60
Gram- negative
E. coli O157H7 62.5 125.0 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 15.60 31.25 15.60 31.25
E. coli ATCC 62.5 125.0 125.0 250.0 125.0 250.0 15.60 31.25 7.80 15.60
K. pneumoniae 125.0 250.0 >1000 >1000 125.0 500.0 15.60 31.25 15.60 31.25
P. aeruginosa 125.0 1000.0 500.0 1000.0 62.5 125.0 15.60 31.25 7.80 15.60
P. stutzeri 125.0 250.0 125.0 250.0 125.0 250.0 31.25 62.50 31.25 62.50
S. boydii 125.0 500.0 500.0 1000.0 125.0 250.0 15.60 31.25 15.60 31.25
26
World Appl. Sci. J., 16 (1): 22-29, 2012
Result from the study also showed some bacteria role of phenolic phytochemicals having an antioxidant
were less sensitive towards 80% methanol extract. This is activity as well as antibacterial activity especially E. coli
not unexpected as earlier report [32] showed similar result, O157:H7. Emerging epidemiological evidence is
albeit using a different Ludwigia species that is L. increasingly pointing to the beneficial effects of phenolic
adscendens. Our result that polar extract were active phytochemicals having antioxidant activity in managing
against wide range of bacteria also concur with earlier infectious diseases [38]. Synergistic phenolics and
report on polar solvent extract of L. octovalvis which antioxidant activity inhibits bacterial growth and this has
exhibited significantly higher antibacterial activity against implications for diet-based management of infectious
dermatological bacteria than did the non-polar extracts disease which is an inexpensive blocker against infectious
such as petroleum ether, hexane and chloroform [16]. diseases [39]. A mixture of phenolics phytochemicals in
For the root, TPC and AOA of 80%methanol extract whole foods is effective in protectively supporting human
was lower than that of ethyl acetate, which may be due to health compared to isolated individual phenolic
the differences in morphological and anatomical phytochemicals. L. octovalvis is potentially useful as
characteristics of the different parts of a plant. This sources of phenolics and therefore future studies should
necessitates a different extraction solvent system to identify the profile of phenolic phytochemicals which
ensure optimum recovery of TPC [33]. TPC in ethyl contributes to the functionality of the plant from
acetate extract is three times lower than in leaves and synergistic interaction of constituent phenolic
stem, so its contribution to the observed antibacterial phytochemicals.
activity was possibly minor.
To the best of our knowledge, activity of L. CONCLUSIONS
octovalvis against E. coli O157:H7, a newly emerging
pathogen appears lacking. By microdilution assay, only Extracting solvents and plant parts influenced the
80% methanol extract of leaf inhibited both E. coli strains TPC, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of the
at the lowest MIC (62.5µg/ml) and MBC (125 µg/ml) extracts. The most polar solvent used (80% methanol)
values. This finding suggests the potential of leaf extract extracted the most total phenolics from leaf and stem,
as a natural source of both, phenolics which are which correlates strongly with their high antioxidant and
antibacterials and antioxidants. Only one publication explains why the extract has antibacterial activity. Eighty
reported the MIC of L. octovalvis and that was against percent methanol extract of leaf inhibited both E. coli
S.mutans [14]. Our study showed that MIC of all 80% 0157:H7 and E. coli ATCC 25922 and Bacillus spizizenii
methanol extracts against S. mutans was 125.0 µg/ml, (ATCC 6633), while that of the root inhibited
much lower than that of the aqueous extract of the entire Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) at MIC and
plant at 2000 µg/ml. This showed 80% methanol as the MBC values of 62.5 ug/ml and 125 ug/ml, respectively.
preferred solvent for extracting antibacterial phenolic Other extracts were considered ineffective as the MIC and
compounds from L. octovalvis. Overall, antioxidant MBC were higher than these values. We conclude that
and antibacterial activities of the extracts vary with the 80% methanol extract of the leaf of L. octovalvis could
parts of L. octovalvis and types of solvent used [34]. possibly be a new source of natural mixture of antioxidant
Bioactive components of different species and parts of and anti E. coli O157:H7.
plants have different solubility levels in different
solvents [35]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The extracts were also examined for their antioxidant
activities using DPPH and FRAP assays. Despite This study was supported by an incentive grant
representing different mechanism of actions, these assays (Grant number: 1001/PBiologi/822151) and postgraduate
generated a similar conclusion that TPC correlates grant scheme (1001/PBiologi/843096) from the Universiti
strongly (r > 0.98) with AOA. These results supported Sains Malaysia.
earlier studies [36, 37], who found a significant correlation
between TPC and antioxidant activities, evaluated by REFERENCES
three different analytical methods. Although none of the
extract demonstrated a comparable MIC and MBC values 1. Mohawk, K.L. and A.D. O’Brien, 2011. Mouse
with positive controls, our finding is important because E. model of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection and
coli O157:H7 was sensitive to the phenolics-containing shiga toxin injection. J. Biomedicin and Biotechnol.,
extract. This indicates the potential beneficial synergistic pp: 1-17.
27
World Appl. Sci. J., 16 (1): 22-29, 2012
2. Money, P., A.F. Kelly, S.W. Gould, J. Denholm-Price, 12. Burkill, I.H., 1966. A dictionary of the economic
E.J. Threlfall and M.D. Fielder, 2010. Cattle, weather products of the Malay Peninsula. (2nd ed.).Kuala
and water: mapping Escherichia coli O157: H7 Lumpur: Ministry of Agriculture and co-operative,
infections in humans in England and Scotland. (Volume 1).
Environmental Microbiol., 12: 2633-2644. 13. Chang, C.I., C.C. Ku, J.Y. Chang and Y.H. Kuo, 2004.
3. Abong'o, B.O. and M.N. Momba, 2008. Prevalence Three new oleanane-type triterpenes from Ludwigia
and potential link between E. coli O157:H7 isolated octovalvis with cytotoxic activity against two human
from drinking water, meat and vegetables and stools cancer cell lines. J. Natural Products, 67: 91-93.
of diarrhoeic confirmed and non-confirmed HIV/AIDS 14. Chen, C.P., C.C. Lin and T. Namba, 1989. Screening of
patients in the Amathole District - South Africa. J. Taiwanese crude drugs for antibacterial activity
Appl. Microbiol., 105: 424-431. against Streptococcus mutans. J. Ethnopharmacol.,
4. Singh, J., V.K. Batish and S. Grover, 2009. A 27: 285-295.
Molecular Beacon-based duplex real-time PCR assay 15. Wang, Y.C. and T.L. Huang, 2005. Screening of anti-
for simultaneous detection of Escherichia coli Helicobacter pylori herbs deriving from Taiwanese
O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes in milk and folk medicinal plants. FEMS Immunology and
milk products. Foodborne Pahtogens and Disease, Medical Microbiol., 43: 295-300.
10: 1195-1201. 16. Nanda, U.N., B.B. Barik and S. Sahoo, 2008.
5. Berry, E.D. and J.E. Wells, 2010. Escherichia coli Antimicrobial activity of Ludwigia octovalvis
O157:H7 Recent advances in research on Occurrence, (JACQ) Raven against selected human dermatological
Transmission and Control in cattle and the pathogens. Indian Drugs, 45: 659-662.
production environment. Advances in Food Nutrition
17. Shyur, L.F., J.H. Tsung, J.H. Chen, C.Y. Chiu and C.P.
Res., 60: 67-117.
Lo, 2005. Antioxidant properties of extracts from
6. Ferens, W.A. and C.J. Hovde, 2011. Escherichia coli
medicinal plants popularly used in Taiwan.
O157:H7: animal reservoir and sources of human
International J. Applied Science and Engineering,
infection. Foodborne Pahtogens and Disease,
3: 195-202.
8: 465-487.
18. Yan, J. and X.W. Yang, 2005. Studies on the chemical
7. Hsieh P.C., J.L. Mau and S.H. Huang, 2001.
constituents in herb of Ludwigia octovalvis.
Antimicrobial effect of various combinations of plant
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi., 30: 1923-1926.
extracts. Food Microbiol., 18: 35-43.
(English abstract).
8. Bajpai, V.K., A. Rahman, N.T. Dung, M.K. Huh and
19. Chang, C.I. and Y.H. Kuo, 2007. Oleanane-type
S.C. Kang, 2008. In vitro inhibition of food spoilage
triterpenes from Ludwigia octovalvis. J. Asian
and foodborne pathogenic bacteria by essential oil
Natural Products Res., 9: 67-72.
and leaf extracts of Magnolia liliflora Desr. J. Food
20. Wu, S.J., L.T. Ng, G.H. Wang, Y.J. Huang, J.L. Chen
Sci., 73: 314-320.
9. Sutherland, J., M. Miles, D. Hedderley, J. Li, S. and F.M. Sun, 2010. Chlorophyll a, an active
Devoy, K. Sutton and D. Lauren, 2009. In vitro antiproliferative compound of Ludwigia octovalvis,
effects of food extracts on selective probiotic and activates the CD95 (APO-1/CD95) system and AMPK
pathogenic bacteria. International J. Food Sciences pathway in 3T3-L1 cells. Food and Chemical Toxicol.,
and Nutrition, 60: 717-727. 48: 716-721.
10. Bajpai, V.K. and S.C. Kang, 2010. Antibacterial 21. Chorianopoulos, N., E. Kalpoutzakis, N. Aligiannis, S.
abietane-type diterpenoid, taxodone from Mitaku, G.J. Nychas and S.A. Haroutounian, 2004.
Metasequoia glyptoetroboides Miki ex Tu. J. Essential oils of Satureja, Origanum and Thymus
Biosciences, 35: 533-538. species: chemical composition and antibacterial
11. Ipor, I., 2002. Ludwigia octovalvis (Jacq.) P.H. Raven. activities against foodborne pathogens. J.
In: J.L.C.H. Van Valkenburg and N. Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52: 8261-8267.
Bunyapraphatsara, (Eds.), Plant Resources of South- 22. Slinkard, K. and V.L. Singleton, 1977. Total phenol
East Asia No 12(2) Medicinal and poisonous analysis: Automation and comparison with manual
plants 2. Bogor, Indonesia: Prosea Foundation, methods. American J. Enology and Viticulture,
pp: 358-359. 28: 49-55.
28
World Appl. Sci. J., 16 (1): 22-29, 2012
23. Elhawary, S.S., M.E. Eltantawy, A.A. Sleem, M.H. 31. Nohynek, L.J., H.L. Alakomi, M.P. Kahkonen,
Abdallah and N.M. Mohamed, 2011. Investigation of M. Heinonen, I.M. Helander, K.M. Oksman-
phenolic content and biological activities of Caldentey and R.H. Puupponen-Pimia, 2006. Berry
Scabiosa atropurpurea L. World Applied Sciences phenolics antimicrobial properties and mechanisms of
Journal, 15(3): 311-317. action against severe human pathogens. Nutrition
24. Brand-Williams, W., M.E. Cuvelier and C. Berset, and Cancer, 54: 18-32.
1995. Use of free radical method to evaluate 32. Ahmed, F., M.S.T. Selim and J.A. Shilpi, 2005.
antioxidant activity. Lebensmittel Wissenschaft and Antibacterial activity of Ludwigia adscendens.
Technol., 28: 25-30. Fitoterapia, 76: 473-475.
25. Nagaraj, M., V. Sandhya, G. Supriya and R. Manju, 33. Naczk, M. and F. Shahidi, 2006. Phenolics in cereals,
1010. Antioxidant and antibacterial activity of fruits and vegetables: Occurrence, extraction and
Avocado (Persea gratissima Gaertner) seed extract. analysis. J. Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis,
World Applied Sciences Journal, 9(6): 695-698. 41: 1523-1542.
26. Firuzi, O., A. Lacanna, R. Petrucci, G. Marrosu and L. 34. Aliyu, A.B., A.M. Musa and M.S. Abdullahi and
Saso, 2005. Evaluation of the antioxidant activity of A.O. Oyewale, 2008. Phytochemical and antibacterial
flavonoids by ferric reducing antioxidant power properties of Ludwigia suffruticosa. International J.
assay and cyclic voltammetry. Biochimica et Pure and Appl. Sci., 2: 1-5.
Biophysica Acta, 1721: 174-184. 35. Oloke, J.O. and D.O. Kolawole, 1998. The
27. NCCLS (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory antibacterial and antifungal activities of certain
Standards), 1999. Performance standards for components of Aframomum meleguetea fruits.
antimicrobial disc susceptibility testing. (9th ed.). Fitoterapia, 59: 384-388.
Wayne: Approved Standard, (M100-S9). 36. Paixão, N., R. Perestrelo, J.C. Marques and
28. Eloff, J.N., 1998. A sensitive and quick microplate J.S. Cãmara, 2007. Relationship between antioxidant
method to determine the minimal inhibitory capacity and total phenolic content of red rose and
concentration of plant extracts for bacteria. Planta white wines. Food Chemistry, 105: 204-214.
Medica, 64: 711-713. 37. Kubola, J. and S. Siriamornpun, 2008. Phenolic
29. Jaitak, V., K. Sharma, K. Kalia, N. Kumar, H.P. Singh, contents and antioxidant activities of bitter gourd
V.K. Kaul and B. Singh, 2010. Antioxidant activity of (Momordica charantia L.) leaf stem and fruit fraction
Potentilla fulgens: An alpine plant of western extracts in vitro. Food Chemistry, 110: 881-890.
Himalaya. J. Food Composition and Analysis, 38. Vattem, D.A., R. Ghaedian and K. Shaetty, 2005.
23: 142-147. Enhancing health benefits of berries through
30. Sikkema, J., J.A. De Bont and B. Poolman, 1994. phenolic antioxidant enrichment:focus on cranberry.
Interaction of cyclic hydrocarbons with Asia Pacific J. Clinical Nutrition, 14: 120-130.
biological membranes. The J. Biological Chemistry, 39. Lin, Y.T., Y.I. Kwon, R.G. Labbe and K. Shetty, 2005.
269: 8022-8028. Inhibition of Helicobacter pylori and associated
urease by organo and cranberry phytochemical
synergies. Applied and Environmental Microbiol.,
71: 8558-8564.
29