SUMMER INTERNSHIP REPORT

SHARDA UNIVERSITY
(SCHOOL OF LAW)

INTERN AT
Saket Court complex , New Delhi
Jagat singh Baasta
Advocate On Record

Saket District Court Complex

Submitted To : Submitted By:

Assistant Professor:
Sahejh Singh
MR. ROHIN KOUL
(2019003352)

BA LLB – B

Semester V
 DECLARATION

This declaration is made regarding the internship report which has been prepared and
drafted by Sahejh Singh under the supervision of Adv. JAGAT SINGH BAASTA,
Advocate On Record at Saket district court complex , Chamber No.103**, Saket
district court complex , Delhi-110017. It contains the work accomplished during the
internship which was assigned during the internship. This work was done in respect of
the partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of degree of LL.B.

This internship report has not been submitted either in whole or in part to any other Law
University recognized by the Bar Council of India for the award of any law degree or
diploma within the territory of India.

Sahejh Singh Dated: 20th June, 2021

(2019003352)
BA LLB - B
Year-III,
Semester V
Sharda University, SOL
Greater Noida

Page | 2
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

At the outset, I would like to thank God for his blessings and benevolently granting me
vigor and audacity to complete my internship successfully. Before submitting my
detailed report/dirary on internship, I find an opportunity to place on record my warm
gratitude towards Mr. Rohin Koul sir, Assistant Professor, Sharda University, SOL
our respected teacher to encourage us towards Internship and how to perform our duty
under Internship. I would like to place my warm gratitude towards Adv. Jagat Singh
Baasta (A.O.R) under whom, I completed my internship and I gained a detailed and
useful experience for the purpose of Internship as well as for profession of advocacy in
near future. This is to express gratitude towards a person who guided and motivated me
throughout my internship period. It gives me immense pleasure to acknowledge my
indebtedness and deep sense of gratitude and respect to Mr. Jaypal singh without whose
constant guidance, this internship would have not been possible. I am thankful to him for
his invaluable teachings and advice given to me, for helping me in exploring and
understanding the legal drafting preparation for cases and research methodology better.

Sahejh Singh
Place: New Delhi Dated: 20th july, 2021
 INTRODUCTION

Clinical education program for law students have been available for many years in some
Indian Law Schools. The objective of such programs is to provide an understanding of
the human, social, and policy contexts of law and legal practice.

Internship fulfills an important component of both academic and practical education in

law. The integration of professional experience into the learning process is highly
effective in developing your understanding of the law in actions, as you are able to
observe and perceive the relevance and application of theory to practice. Consequently,
the program is not simply ‘work experience’ but a significant educational experience.

In a workspace setting you will be exposed to the reality of the practice of law in all its dimensions – the
of the government and court system in the legal process.

Since the inception of BA LL.B program at the Sharda University, a practical experience
component i.e. internship has been part of the compulsory subject and thus of the BA
LL.B degree. The Legal Internship Program is not designed to teach students how to be
good lawyers (or how to be lawyers at all) it takes more than study at University to do
that. The objectives are to

 Expose you to the law in operation in contexts where you will come to perceive
aspects of law which cannot be learned from reading or hearing about it ;

 Allow you to perceive ways in which the formal learning you acquire at
University may be applied in practice and thereof to develop an appreciation of
the practical dimensions of legal principals;
 Enable you to relate the different areas of legal practice to the importance of
developing the skills of legal research, communication, drafting, practice
 management and problem-solving ; and

 Enable you to observe and reflect upon the values, ethical standards and conduct
of the legal profession in practice and to develop your own attitudes of
professional responsibility.

The classroom study and practical training in the field of law is considered as two sides
of coin. The legal profession is one of the professions which are considered incomplete
without the practical training. An additional benefit of the internship program is that to
provide you with an opportunity to observe the way in which law operates in a practical
milieu, and so may assist you in making future career choices.
 INTERNSHIP REPORT

(1st July to 31st July,

2021)

I may classify this internship diary in to two components : 1. the factual and analytical
information about your internship (2) drafting of legal documents.

DAILY INTERNSHIP DUTIES:

1. I was assigned to read minimum offour case files to learn how files
are maintained and how the records are maintained.

2. I was assigned to observe the proceedings during the Examination-in-

chief, Cross- Examination and Final Arguments

3. Supporting the lawyers that come into the office and program. Sitting in on
meetings and appointments and offering required assistance.

4. organizational work – photocopying, organizing papers, keeping files in order, organizing the desk.
Office type

5. Reading any suggested law related materials for my own benefit.

6. Helping clients if possible and if I am able to since I don’t know much about the field yet.

7. Interacting to various lawyers in our office.

8. Research on judgments that are related to facts of case.

ENTRY NO 1

DATED : 01.07.2021

I was assigned to observe the counseling the clients with the permission of counsel in at
least two cases. However before this I wish to mention here that client interview and
counseling was also done by the Ld. Judge, in Matrimonial dispute which is pending
before the Family court. However as per direction, I observed the interview and
counseling of two clients in two different cases namely Vipin Tyagi and Roopa Tyagin in
case titled as Vipin Tyagi And Roop Tyagi and Hari Om Sharma and Santan Dharam
Sabha Vs K C Bhargwa.

ENTRY NO. 2

DATED : 04.07.2021

IN THE COURT OF ANU GROVAR BALIGA, ADJ,

PATIALA HOUSE COURT, DELHI

IN THE MATTER OF:

ABC VERSUS XYZ

SECTION INVOLVED:

Claim u/s 96 of CPC, 1908.

OBSERVATION:

The decree has been passed in the favour of the client so the opposite party of my senior
has filed the appeal against the decree.

The proxy counsel on behalf of my senior requested the court to give time to file the reply
to appeal and also the proxy counsel filed vakalatnama.
 NOW THE MATTER IS FIXED FOR 09.11.2021

ENTRY NO. 3

DATED : 05 .07.2021

I was sent to meet a client to get the property transferred from the name of her
grandmother to my clients name via a Will mentioning the details as to the property
which was being transferred. The process was not completed due to not having the
sufficient documents at hand.

ENTRY NO. 4

DATE 07.07.2021

Was assigned research on the topic: Whether a writ is maintainable under article 32
without going through for the same relief in concerned High Court under article 226.
Assigned the task of briefing of the paper book for the matter titled Tanya Banon
Danami Vs. Shome Nikhil Danami and Ors.

ENTRY NO. 5

DATED : 09.07.2021

CLIENT COMPROMISE

IN THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, SAINI ENCLAVE

SANJAY SHARMA V. VOLTAS

OBSERVATION:

Handed over the chequeof rs.5000 to the complainant after settlement and matter was
listed for Lok Adalat.
 ENTRY NO.6

DATED: 11.07.2021

IN THE COURT OF ANIL KUMAR SISODIA, ADJ, TIS HAZARI COURT,

DELHI

IN THE MATTER OF:

ANIL KUMAR DHINGRA VS. AJAY KUMAR AND ORS.

OBSERVATION:

Claim for specific performance, Permanent injunction and declaration.

My senior was appearing for the plaintiff. The adjournment was granted and next date was fixed for further arguments.
JUDGMENT/ORDER: PENDING

NEXT DATE OF HEARING: 17.10.2021

ENTRY NO. 7

DATED: 12.07.2021

IN THE COURT OF RAJ KUMAR, ADJ, TIS HAZARI, NEW DELHI

IN THE MATTER OF:

DALJIT V. RACHIT EXPORTS

OBSERVATION:

Recovery of money amounted 11,80,000.

ORDER/JUDGMENT: PENDING

NEXT DATE OF HEARING: 26.11.2021

Page |
 ENTRY NO. 8

DATED: 14.07.2021

IN THE COURT OF SH. V.K. JAIN, CJ, TIS HAZARI COURT, DELHI

IN THE MATTER OF:

AMIRCHAND VS. MANOHAR

LAL

SECTION INVOLVED:

Suit for permanent injunction.

URT OBSERVATION:

s examination was to be held but the plaintiff offered the compensation in case. The matter was adjourned for a further da

GMENT/ORDER: PENDING

NEXT DATE OF HEARING: 27.10.2021

ENTRY NO. 9

DATED : 16.07.2021

Was assigned to assist associates on drafting a counter affidavit of the pre-emption

petition titled Suresh Prasad and others versus State of Bihar C.W.J.C No. 2398/2004

ENTRY NO. 10

DATED : 18.07.2021
 The drafting of the case was still needed to be done. Went to meet a client as well with the
associate and heard about the issue in the matter. Later on, discussed the case law and the
various charges to be framed under IPC, started drafting work of the pending case law.
Also I was instructed to draft an anticipatory bail in the same matter.

ENTRY NO. 11

DATED : 21.07.2021

IN THE COURT OF SUDESH KUMAR SETHI, CJ ,KARKADOOMA

COURT, DELHI

IN THE MATTER OF:

BALJIT SINGH SINGH VS. BALJEET

SECTION INVOLVED:

SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY

GENERAL OBSERVATION:
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF RS. 1,67,000.

Prosecution witness was present. Brought the original airway bill. His statement was
recorded and discharged.

ENTRY NO. 12

DATED: 25.07.2021

IN THE COURT OF HARISH KUMAR,TIS HAZARI COURT, DELHI

IN THE MATTER OF:

BALJEET SINGH
 VERSUS

ASHOK KUMAR AND ANR.

COURT OBSERVATION:

Suit for recovery of amount Rs. 10,00,000.

The defendant was called to appear before the court with his bill books. The defendant was
admitted in hospital so he could not appear.

STATUS: PENDING.

ENTRY NO.13

DATED: 27.07.2021

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUDGE , FAMILY COURT, DELHI

MAHIPAL SHARMA ….. PETITIONER NO.1

s. BEENA SANWARIA…….

PETITIONER NO.2

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE:

Divorce petition u/s 13B(1) of HMA.

OBSERVATION:

Only a petition was filed. Court gave order to wait for a mandatory period of 6-18

months. ORDER/JUDGMENT: PENDING

 ENTRY NO.14

DATED: 29.07.2021

Assigned a work of translation of a order of District Magistrate regarding the

restriction and checks in the cases of illegal sand mining in Gonda district of Uttar
Pradesh
Was assigned to make notes on Epistolary Jurisdiction exercised by the Hon’ble Courts.
The task took around first half under which I had studied various Case laws and theories
of eminent legal personalities. Read the Article 226 and Article 32 for the purpose and
done with the notes on Public Interest Litigation and the exercised of appellate courts
over subordinate courts.

ENTRY NO. 15

DATED : 30.07.2021

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, Delhi

In the matter of : SUNIL YADAV V. JAIKISHAN

Observation: Matter involving recovery of money and damage for the faulty product sold
to our client. Further date was given for the hearing as our counsel was not able to reach
on time. I was asked by my counsel to go to the court room and ask for the matter to be
listed last that day. The honorable judge did not agree.
 EXPERIENCE DURING THEINTERNSHIP

The District Court in reality is different from the court generally shown in the Movies. In
movies the job of lawyer is more similar to a detective which is a far cry from the reality.
The job of a lawyer is only to assist a party in a suit regarding the proceedings and
appear before Judge on his behalf. Every lawyer maintains a court diary, which proved
handy and very useful as all the details of the case are entered in the diary with proper
date and its petition number. It proves to be useful, as respective cases are recorded by
the lawyer date wise and it saves time to think and search of the cases as per the present
date. During my internship I learned to maintain the lawyer’s diary. It was a learning
experience as juniors take one year for learning the court proceedings which I could learn
during the period of internship. Though one month was not sufficient but it
was enough to learn about the basis. Basics can be learned only in trial court. I have
learned the basics of drafting. I could get to know about Fast Track Court and LokAdalat
which is an emerging concept. I really tried hard to learn. It was adventurous for me as
everything was unpredictable. Every client comes with a new case, new situation, a new
problem and which doesn’t have any perfect answer. I also experienced the expressions
and thoughts of the Hon’ble Judges. When they are in good mood, they will tell you how
to do the things correctly but if not then they will scold you for the simple mistakes you
have done. About advocates I experiences that it is not easy to work as an advocate, it
requires a lot of dedication and hard work, only then you can achieve success, and most
importantly social recognition.

In the office I learned all the official work, filing Talwana, Vakalatnama etc. All these
documents are very important and an advocate must know how to fill them and use them,
Talwana is used for many things such as for issuing attach warrant, issuing notices etc.

I also learned that it is very important to be always reading cases and new enactments,
keep yourself always sound minded, and while dealing with a case read the facts of the
case very carefully and try to find all the loopholes and then use them in your favor, also
while cross questioning with the witness never allow him/her to be confident ask them
twisted questions so that they become nervous and are not able to answer properly.
 PART- II

DRAFTED DOCUMENTS

DOCUMENT 1.

BEFORE THE HON'BLE COURT OF SH. ARUN KUMAR ARYA:

PRESIDING OFFICER-FAMILY COURT, PATIALA HOUSE
COURT, NEW DELHI
 HMA CASE NO.354/2016

IN THE MATTER OF: -

SHEREEN ….PETITIONER

VERSUS

RISHANT JAIN ….RESPONDENT

APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT UNDER

SECTION151OFCODEOFCIVILPROCEDUREFOR

DIRECTION TO THE PETITIONER IN VIEW OF ORDER

DATED 10.08.2016 FOR HANDING OVER THE CHILDREN FOR

CELEBRATION OF THE BIRTHDAY OF CHILD i.e Master

VIVAAN ON 15.05.2017.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: -

1. That the Petitioner had instituted petition under section 13(1)(i)(a) of

Hindu Marriage Act alleging various acts of cruelty on her by the

Respondent.

2. That upon issuance of summons of this Hon'ble Court the Respondent put
 in his appearance on 10.08.2016 before this Hon'ble Court and filed his

written statement.

3. That the Petitioner and Respondent got wedded as per Hindu Rites and

Customs on 05.12.2002 in AryaSamajMandir at VasantKunj, New Delhi

and from the said marriage wedlock two children is born on 22.07.2005

and 05.05.2011 named Shreya Jain and Vivank Jain respectively.

4. That dispute between the parties arose on 04.08.2015 and the Petitioner left with

her parents and admittedly both the children are residing with the Petitioner since

then at the parental home of the Petitioner. It is further admitted fact during the

period from 04.08.2015 the Respondent regularly meeting with his children and

even going out of station with children.

5. That the basic dispute between the parties relates to one Mr. ManasArora

who is maligning the mind of the Petitioner resultantly the relation

between the Petitioner and Respondent got strained and the same reached

to this stage that parties are before this Hon'ble Court.

6. That the Respondent forced to institute a petition under section 497 and

other section of Indian Penal Code against the accused Manas Arora who

has made dangerous efforts to spoil the relation between the Petitioner and

the Respondent and succeeded to a great extent. The Hon'ble Court of Sh.

Naresh Kumar Laka passed following orders on the complaint of the

Respondent which reads as under: -“….Submissions heard. Let status be

 called from concerned SHO on the complaint in terms of judgment

of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of LalitaKumari Versus State.

Another application seeking preservation/seizure of call details of

mobile numbers i.e. 9654600372, 9711412821 & 9910072158 has

been filed. It is stated that this application is very urgent.

Accordingly, arguments heard.

As the allegations of the adultery have been leveled in the present

case, I am of the opinion that if no direction is given to

ce of the evidence. It is also the general practice that such call details are not provided to the individual private pe

application seeking preservation/seizure of call details is allowed

with the condition that Complainant will file relevant details of the

concerned service provider alongwith PF. On filing of the same,

copy of this order and copy of application be sent to the concerned

service providers with the direction to preserve the call details of

the above mentioned respective mobile number for the period as

mentioned in the application with Tower location and IMEI number.

That due to constant intervention of the accused ManasArora the Petitioner

is acting on his ill advice and not permitting the Respondent to even meet
 his children which is giving immense pain and torture. The Petitioner even

not hesitating in violating the order dated 10.08.2016 as passed by this

Hon'ble Court. That an application has already been moved in this regard

by the Respondent and same is pending subjudice before the Hon'ble Court

for adjudication.

7. That through the earlier application the Petitioner had sought various

prayers related to regular meeting and comfortable interaction with his

children hence the prayer and relief sought from this Hon'ble Court

through the earlier application are not reproduced in this application in

order to avoid multiplicity of pleading and same be read as part and parcel

to this application as well.

8. That since last more than five months the Respondent is unable to live and

celebrate with his children any of the festival and occasion. It is submitted

that on 5.05.2015 the child of the respondent named Master vivaan have

birthday and the respondent want to celebrate this auspicious occasion with

his children. It is further submitting that the respondent wants to take the

children out of station for celebrating his birthday. It is further submitting

that the on 04.05.2015 have Friday and on 05.05.2015 have Saturday. The

respondent wants to take the children out of station for celebrating the

birthday on the Friday after attending the school by the children. It is

further submitting that respondent want to take the children on Friday after

attending the school by which children will not lose their study and after it
 have Saturday on which school will remain closed. It is further submitted

that the birthday of the children are very auspicious occasion for the father

and every father wants to celebrate and enjoy this occasion with their

children. It is further submitting that without the presence of the children

the respondent has no meaning for that day. It is further submitting that the

after celebrating the birthday the respondent will hand over the children to

the petitioner on 06.05.2017. The respondent is seeking the permission to

take his children for celebrating the birthday of the child from this Hon’ble

court and standing before this Hon’ble for his folded hand, the Hon’ble

court may grant the permission to the respondent to take the children for

three day i.e 04.05.2017 to 06.05.2017.

9. That the respondent has already filed the application for the custody of the

children U/s section 26 of H.M.A which is pending for thedisposal.

PRAYER: -

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed before this Hon'ble Court that

Petitioner be directed to hand over the children for three days from 04.05.2017 till

06.05.2017 to celebrate the birthday of the child named MaasterVivaanand the

Respondent undertakes that he will hand over the children in the evening on

05.05.2017. It is prayed accordingly.

 RESPONDENT (RISHANT JAIN)

THROUGH

PLACE:DEHI
(JAGAT SINGH BAASTA)
DATED: -
ADVOCATE ON
RECORD SUPREME
COURT OF INDIA

NEW LAWYERS CHAMBER NO.2** M.C.SHITALVAD BLOCK, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA,

NEW DELHI -110001

DOCUMENT 2.

BEORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

(ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

CO.PETITION 553/2016

IN THE MATTER OF:

M/S CLASSIC SWITCHGEAR & CONTROL

PVT. LTD : PETITIONER
 VERSUS

M/S VXL REALTORS PVT. LTD & ORS : RESPONDENTS

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 448 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, FOR

APPOINTMENT OF OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. The petitioner is into the business of manufacturing, assembling and marketing of

electrical products and had preferred the present petition for winding up of the

Respondent company.

2. That the respondent no.2 and 3 directors of respondent no.1 and are engaged into

the business of construction of turnkey projects and are responsible for the

decisions of respondent no.1.

3. That the respondent no.1 through respondent no.2 and 3 approached petitioner

company for supply of one main LT Panel for their project Eastern Heights, Nyay

Khand-III, Indrapuram, Ghaziabad, U.P and also approached for supply of AMF Panel

for 250 KVA D.G a Eastern Gates, GH-3, Sector-4G, Vasundhara, Ghaziabad through

two purchase orders having purchase orders no. VXL/EG/2012/0031 &

VXL/EG/2012/0031 both dated 24.05.2012 and 16.05.2012 respectively and said

purchase order also received through email dated 17.05.2012 and 24.05.2012.

4. That against the said purchase order the petitioner supplied the same through Invoice no.

005 dated 04.06.2015 for a sum of Rs. 2,27,000.00 and through invoice no. 009 dated

05.07.2012 for a sum of Rs. 12,62,550.00 and both stand supplied to the satisfaction of

the respondents and VAT dues stand paid by the

 petitioner and even same is utilized by the respondents.

5. The against the said supply of goods the respondent made part payment from

time to time and lastly paid on 20.05.2016 thereby part payment made of Rs. 8,

27,000.00 out of the total liability of Rs. 14, 89,550.00 and the respondents are

under the liability for sum of Rs. 6,62,550.00/- in favour of the petitioner

company.

6. That the petitioner company sent remainders to the respondents for making

payment of balance outstanding through email dated 02.02.2013 and 26.02.2013.

7. That the last payment of Rs. 47,000.00 was paid when the respondents were

served with personal notice dated 02.03.2013. after it the petitioner again sent

s but they had not responded, hence the respondents were served with the notice on 02.06.2014 through the speed post o
for the said outstanding amount of Rs. 6,62,550.00/-.

8. That having no option, the petitioner company has finally sent a legal notice as

per the statutory requirement of companies act, 1956 on 23.04.2016 calling upon

the respondents to make the payment to the tune of Rs. 13, 58,125.00/- which is

inclusive of interest of Rs. 6, 95,625.00/- along with principal outstanding of Rs. 6,

62,625.00/- along with principal outstanding of Rs. 6, 62,550.00/- within 21 days from

the receipt of notice on all the available addresses of the respondents. The said legal

notice also tried to serve on the Email-ID of the respondents company but same got

failed.

9. That as per the statement of ledger account, a sum of Rs. 13,58,125.00/- inclusive

of Rs. 6,62,550.00/- towards principal and interest thereon of Rs. 6,95,625.00/-

calculated till 20.04.2016 @ 3% per month is due to respondent company which

is unpaid till date. The respondent no.1 company has failed, neglected and

refused to pay the said sum of Rs. 13,58,125.00/- or any portion thereof.
10. Hence the petitioner filed the present suit. The Hon’ble court passed the interim

order in favour of petitioner vides order dated 27.09.2016. The petitioner is

always obliged for kindness act of the Hon’ble court for passing the interim order

in the favour of the petitioner

11. That the petitioner is praying for appointing the official liquidator to take the

proceeding qua the respondents.

12 This application is bona fide and for the ends of justice.

PRAYER :-

The Petitioner Company, therefore, most humbly prays Your Lordships for the following

orders:

a)That the Hon’ble court may appoint the proper person as official liquidator to take

the charge of the business affairs and assets of the respondent company with all the

necessary powers under the companies Act, 1956.

b)That the Hon’ble may give direction to attach the moveable and Immovableassets

of the respondent company.

 c
That pending the hearing and final disposal of this petition, the Official Liquidator attached to this Hon’ble Cou
immediately of the business affairs and assets of the said Company with all powers

under the Companies Act, 1956.

d) Costs of and incidental to this applica

Petitioner Company at the first instan

properties of the said Company;

For such further and other reliefs as

e)

this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and p

And your petitioner as in duty bound shall e

..
 CONCLUSION

The conclusion of this internship report is that I’ve worked under the Advocate of
Supreme Court of India.
During the time period of 01.07.2021 - 31.07.2021.

I’ve learned some of the basic procedures of the Court and how each of them functions
and the powers vested in each of them.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

The Above mentioned Contents in this Report have been provided to me by My Senior
Advocate.

I was under the Internship of Adv. JAGAT SINGH BAASTA

All the facts have been put into my Notice by the above Mentioned People.

I am able to make this Report with the help of the above Mentioned People, a Senior
Student and Google Docs.