Module 01 - General Principles of Taxation
Module 01 - General Principles of Taxation
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
LEARNING OUTCOMES
At the end of this module, you are expected to:
Pre-Activity
Identify the words which are described by the following statements by filling out the boxes on the left.
1. This is the power of the State enforce proportional contribution from its
subjects to sustain itself.
2. Taxes are the main form of government _____________.
3. This is the place of taxation.
4. This is the process of transferring the tax burden to other taxpayers.
These rights dubbed as “powers” are natural, inseparable and inherent to every government. No
government can sustain or effectively operate without these powers. Therefore, the exercise of
these powers by the government is presumed understood and acknowledged by the people from
the very moment they establish their government.
Taxation
This is the power of the State to enforce proportional contribution from its subjects to sustain
itself.
Police Power
This is the inherent power of a sovereign state to legislate for the protection of the health, general
welfare, safety and morals of the public. It involves the power to regulate both liberty and
property for the promotion of the public good.
The police power of the State may be exercised through taxation because taxes may be levied
for the promotion of the welfare of the public.
Eminent Domain
This is the power of the State to take private property for public use after paying just
compensation. This is synonymous to expropriation.
TAXATION
Taxation is the inherent power of the state1, exercised through the legislature2, to impose burdens3
upon subjects and objects4 within its jurisdiction5 for the purpose of raising revenues6 to carry out
the functions7 of government.
3. Impose Burdens
The imposition of taxes to individuals, objects or privileges normally would cause a
financial burden to the taxpayer.
Purposes of Taxation
The exercise of the power of taxation may be classified as to its purpose.
Revenue or Fiscal
The primary purpose of taxation on the part of the government is to provide funds or property
with which to promote the general welfare and the protection of its citizens and to enable it to
finance its multifarious activities.
Non-Revenue or Regulatory
Taxation may also be employed for purposes of regulation or control, e.g., imposition of tariffs
on imported goods to protect local industries, the adoption of progressively higher tax rates to
reduce inequalities in wealth and income and the increase or decrease of taxes to prevent inflation
or ward off depression.
In return for his contribution, the taxpayer receives the general advantages and protection which
the government affords the taxpayer and his property. One is compensation or consideration for
the other; protection for support and support for protection.
However, it does not mean that only those who are able to and do pay taxes can enjoy the
privileges and protection given to a citizen by the government.
In fact, from the contribution received, the government renders no special or commensurate
benefit to any particular property or person. The only benefit to which the taxpayer is entitled is
that derived from the enjoyment of the privilege of living in an organized society established and
safeguarded by the devotion of taxes to public purpose. The government promises nothing to the
person taxed beyond what may be anticipated from an administration of the laws for the general
good.
Receipt of benefits conclusively presumed
Every citizen and resident of the state directly or indirectly benefits from the public services
rendered by the government. These benefits can be in form of daily free usage of public
infrastructures, access to public health or educational services, the protection and security of
person and property, or simply the comfort of living in a civilized and peaceful society which
is maintained by the government.
While most public services are received indirectly, their realization by every citizen and
resident is undeniable. In taxation, the receipt of these benefits by the people is conclusively
presumed, thus, taxpayers cannot avoid payment of taxes under the defense of absence of
benefit received. The direct receipt or actual availment of government services is not a
precondition to taxation.
Lifeblood Doctrine:
Taxes are the lifeblood of the government and should be collected without necessary hindrance.
They are what we pay for a civilized society. Without taxes, the government would be paralyzed
for lack of motive power to activate and operate it. The government, for its part, is expected to
respond in the form of tangible and intangible benefits intended to improve the lives of the people
and enhance their moral and material values. Taxes are the lifeblood of the government and their
prompt and certain availability is an imperious need. Put simply, taxes are needed by the
government to carry out its functions.
Holme’s Doctrine
“Taxation power is not the power to destroy while the court sits.” Taxation power may be used
to build or encourage beneficial activities or industries by the grant of tax incentives.
Exceptions:
a. Where the taxpayer’s claim has already become due and demandable such as when the
government already recognized the same and an appropriation for refund was made
b. Cases of obvious overpayment of taxes
c. Local taxes
Non-Assignment of Taxes
Tax obligations cannot be transferred to another entity by contract. Contracts executed by the
taxpayer to such effect shall not hinder the government to collect taxes.
Imprescriptibility in Taxation
The government’s right to collect taxes does not prescribe unless the law itself provides.
In the Philippines, tax prescribes if not collected within 5 years from the date of its assessment.
In the absence of an assessment, tax prescribes if not collected within 3 years from the date the
return is required to be filed. However, taxes due from taxpayers who did not file a return or
those who filed a fraudulent returns do not prescribe.
Doctrine of Estoppel
The error of any government employee does not bind the government. It is held that the neglect
or omission of government officials entrusted with the collection of taxes should not be allowed
to bring harm or detriment to the interest of the people.
Judicial Non-Interference
Generally, courts are not allowed to issue injunction against the government’s pursuit to collect
tax as this would unnecessarily defer tax collection.
SCOPE OF TAXATION
The power of taxation is the most absolute of all powers of the government. It has the broadest
scope of all the powers of government because in the absence of limitations, it is considered as
comprehensive, unlimited, plenary and supreme.
However, the power of taxation should be exercised with caution to minimize injury to the
proprietary rights of the taxpayer. It must be exercised fairly, equally, and uniformly, lest the tax
collector kill “the hen that lays the golden egg”.
LIMITATIONS OF TAXATION
Despite the unseemingly unlimited nature of taxation, it is not absolutely unlimited. Taxation has
its own inherent limitations and limitations imposed by the Constitution.
Inherent Limitations
Territoriality
Public services are normally provided within the boundaries of the State, thus, tax can be imposed
only within its territories. It cannot tax outside because foreigners do not derive benefits from our
government. The Philippines would not tax objects from foreign States as this would amount to
encroachment of foreign sovereignty.
International Comity
This pertains to mutual courtesy or reciprocity between states. When a state enters into treaties
with other states, it is bound to honor the agreements as a matter of mutual courtesy and in case
such treaties are in conflict with local laws, the treaties are given primacy.
Public Purpose
Proceeds from the collection of tax is intended for the common good, thus, tax must be exercised
absolutely for public purpose and cannot be exercised to further any private interest.
Constitutional Limitations
As the power of taxation is inherent to every state, there is no need for an express stipulation of
law for the State to exercise it. In fact, the Constitution only tackles the power of taxation by
imposing limitations on its exercise.
A common example of this would be the Congress cannot exempt sellers of “balot” while
subjecting sellers of “penoy” to tax since they are essentially the same goods.
Uniformity Rule
Taxpayers under dissimilar circumstances should not be taxed the same. Taxpayers should be
classified according to commonality in attributes. Each class is taxed differently but taxpayers
falling under the same class are taxed the same.
Progressive System
In a progressive system, tax rates increase as the tax base increases. This is consistent with the
ability to pay theory. Moreover, the progressive system aids in an equitable distribution of wealth
to society by taxing the rich more than the poor.
Non-appropriation of public funds or property for the benefit of any church, sect, or system of
religion
This constitutional limitation is intended to highlight the separation of the church and the state.
To support freedom of religion, the government should not favor any particular system of
religion by appropriating public funds or property in support thereof.
Exemption from taxes of the revenues and assets of non-profit, non-stock, educational
institutions
The Constitution recognizes the necessity of education in state building by granting tax
exemption on revenues and assets of non-profit educational institutions. This exemption,
however, applies only on assets and revenues actually, directly and exclusively devoted for
educational purposes.
Concurrence of a majority of all members of Congress for the passage of a law granting tax
exemption
The Constitution requires the vote of majority of all members of Congress in the grant of tax
exemptions. A quorum majority, however, is only required for the withdrawal of tax exemption.
Appropriations, revenue and tariff bills shall originate exclusively from the House of
Representatives
Tax Laws should emanate from the House of Representatives, however, the Senate may propose
tax laws and may concur amendment.
Each LGU shall exercise the power to create its own sources of revenue and shall have a just
share in the national taxes
This is a constitutional recognition of the local autonomy of LGUs and an express delegation of
taxing power.
SITUS OF TAXATION
Situs is the place of taxation. It is the tax jurisdiction that has the power to levy taxes upon the tax
object. Situs rules serves as frames of reference in gauging whether the tax object is within or
outside the tax jurisdiction of the taxing authority.
Other situs rules may be followed depending on the kind of tax being imposed.
Nash E. Mulan, a Chinese national, resides in Sampaloc, Manila. He has the following
endeavors:
He has a car dealership business in Macau and a restaurant operation in Quezon City.
He renders consultancy services in the main office of a domestic company.
He casually sells jewelry stored in Pasay City. During his trip to Palawan, he agreed to
Kim Bong-Un to sell a piece of necklace. They stipulated that it will be delivered in
Pyongyang a week later.
Mr. Mulan owns a hectare parcel of land in Chonburi, Thailand.
The Philippine government can only impose business taxes upon Mr. Mulan relating to his restaurant
operation since it is within the territory of the country. Income tax on his consultancy services may also
be collected since it is rendered within the Philippines considering it is a domestic company. Regarding
the sale of necklace to Kim Bong-Un, the Philippine government can tax the gain from said sale since the
sale was perfected in Palawan. The stipulation of delivery in North Korea is not considered in this case.
No local government unit in the Philippines can impose a real property tax on the parcel of land owned
by Nash since it is found in Thailand. Mr. Mulan, being a resident of the country, shall be subject to
personal tax, notwithstanding his Chinese nationality.
DOUBLE TAXATION
Double Taxation can be either direct or indirect. For a double taxation to be considered direct, all
of the following characteristics should concur:
The state taxes the income of self-employed individuals at 10% of its monthly gross receipts. In addition,
it also imposes a 2% annual income tax on the annual gross receipts.
In this case, self-employed individuals are burdened by paying the monthly and annual income
tax based on their gross receipts (the annual totaling all monthly gross receipts). It was imposed
by the same taxing authority within the same jurisdiction, with the same purpose of taxing the
income for the same period.
The absence of one or more of the given circumstances does not constitute direct double taxation,
thus, classifying it as an indirect double taxation.
Constitutionality of Double Taxation:
The Philippine Constitution does not prohibit double taxation. However, while it is not
forbidden, it is something not favored. Such taxation should, whenever possible, be avoided
and prevented. In addition, where there is direct double taxation, there may be a violation of
the constitutional precepts of equal protection and uniformity in taxation.
Tax Evasion
Also known as tax dodging, it refers to any act or trick that tends to illegally reduce or avoid the
payment of tax.
Tax Avoidance
Also known as tax minimization, refers to any act or trick that reduces or totally escapes taxes by
any legally permissible means.
To further illustrate the difference between tax evasion and tax avoidance, refer to the table below.
Tax Exemption
Also known as tax holiday, refers to immunity, privilege or freedom from being subject to a tax
which others are subject to.
Shifting
This is the process of transferring the tax burden to other taxpayers.
Capitalization
This pertains to the adjustment of the value of an asset caused by changes in tax rates.
Transformation
This pertains to the elimination of wastes and losses by the taxpayer to form savings to
compensate for the tax imposition or increase in taxes.
References:
Banggawan, R. (2019). Income Taxation. Pasay City: Real Excellence Publishing.
Valencia, G. & Roxas, E. (2016). Income Taxation. Baguio City: Valencia Educational Supply.
Reyes, V. (2019). Income Tax Law and Accounting under the TRAIN Law. Manila: GIC Enterprises & Co., Inc.
Ampongan O. (2018). Income Taxation. Mandaluyong City: Millennium Books, Inc.
Self-Check!
Basing on your readings, answer the following questions.
1. Identify and differentiate the three inherent powers of the State.
2. What is the difference between the theory and basis of taxation?
3. What is the scope of taxation and what are the sources of its limitations?
4. What are the acts considered as stages in the exercise of the power of taxation?
5. Explain the concept of situs and how it affects taxability of a transaction.
6. What constitutes a double taxation? Is it permitted?
7. How can a taxpayer escape from paying taxes?
______2. Persons or things belonging to the same class shall be taxed at the same rate
a. Simplicity in taxation
b. Equality in taxation
c. Reciprocity in taxation
d. Uniformity in taxation
______3. For double taxation to be considered direct, it should meet the following criteria,
except
a. Taxing the same object twice
b. Same period
c. Same amount of tax
d. Same jurisdiction
______5. Taxation as distinguished from police power and power of eminent domain
a. Property is taken to promote the general welfare
b. May be exercised only by the government
c. Operates upon the whole citizenry
d. There is generally no limit as to the amount that may be imposed
Sweet, a sugar planter, files a suit questioning the constitutionality of the law alleging that the
tax is not for a public purpose as the same is being levied exclusively for the aid and support
of the sugar industry.
Is the contention of Sweet tenable?
One of Wakanda’s officials, Senator Jack A. Moon, questioned the internal revenue office on its
issuance indicating that it was not moral for it to run after online businesses and impose taxes
on their income, more so that they are normally conducting such endeavors for mere
subsistence.
Is the senator’s contention tenable?