Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 656 views

    Analysis: How Credible The 3 Account in Explaining The Cavite Mutiny of 1872?

    Uploaded by

    Carlos Miguel Andal
    The document analyzes the credibility of three accounts of the Cavite Mutiny of 1872: the report of the Spanish governor general, Jose Montero y Vidal's account, and Teodoro H. de la Tavera's account. Vidal's account is considered the most reliable as he lived in the Philippines from 1869 to 1896 and conducted first-hand observations. While the governor general's report aligns with Vidal's account, the governor is seen as biased towards the Spanish. Tavera, as a native Filipino historian, provides primary source knowledge but disputes the governor's portrayal of a full-blown conspiracy, seeing it instead as an expression of disappointment over unfair treatment by the Spanish

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Analysis: How Credible The 3 Account in Explaining The Cavite Mutiny of 1872?

    Uploaded by

    Carlos Miguel Andal
    656 views3 pages
    The document analyzes the credibility of three accounts of the Cavite Mutiny of 1872: the report of the Spanish governor general, Jose Montero y Vidal's account, and Teodoro H. de la Tavera's account. Vidal's account is considered the most reliable as he lived in the Philippines from 1869 to 1896 and conducted first-hand observations. While the governor general's report aligns with Vidal's account, the governor is seen as biased towards the Spanish. Tavera, as a native Filipino historian, provides primary source knowledge but disputes the governor's portrayal of a full-blown conspiracy, seeing it instead as an expression of disappointment over unfair treatment by the Spanish

    Original Title

    CAVITEMUTINY

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document analyzes the credibility of three accounts of the Cavite Mutiny of 1872: the report of the Spanish governor general, Jose Montero y Vidal's account, and Teodoro H. de la Tavera's account. Vidal's account is considered the most reliable as he lived in the Philippines from 1869 to 1896 and conducted first-hand observations. While the governor general's report aligns with Vidal's account, the governor is seen as biased towards the Spanish. Tavera, as a native Filipino historian, provides primary source knowledge but disputes the governor's portrayal of a full-blown conspiracy, seeing it instead as an expression of disappointment over unfair treatment by the Spanish

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    656 views3 pages

    Analysis: How Credible The 3 Account in Explaining The Cavite Mutiny of 1872?

    Uploaded by

    Carlos Miguel Andal
    The document analyzes the credibility of three accounts of the Cavite Mutiny of 1872: the report of the Spanish governor general, Jose Montero y Vidal's account, and Teodoro H. de la Tavera's account. Vidal's account is considered the most reliable as he lived in the Philippines from 1869 to 1896 and conducted first-hand observations. While the governor general's report aligns with Vidal's account, the governor is seen as biased towards the Spanish. Tavera, as a native Filipino historian, provides primary source knowledge but disputes the governor's portrayal of a full-blown conspiracy, seeing it instead as an expression of disappointment over unfair treatment by the Spanish

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Name: Andal, Carlos Miguel L Score: ________

    Course & Year Level: BSN1-C Date: __________

    Analysis: How credible the 3 account in explaining the Cavite Mutiny of


    1872?
    Report of the governor Vidal’s Account T,H de Tavera’s
    general Account

    Governor General Vidal’s account was Pardo De Tavera


    Izquierdo insisted that considered as the most was a native Filipino
    the Cavite mutiny was reliable source. Almost historian. He didn’t
    stimulated and all of his claims are agreed on the way how
    prepared by the native notably same from what did Governor Izquierdo
    clergies, mestizos and actually happened. sees everything around.
    lawyers as a way on Armed also with a
    expressing their His credibility rises primary source of
    disappointment on the due to that he lived here knowledge as he was
    injustices of the in the Philippines from part of the said actions
    government . One good 1869 to 1896. He was and happenings within
    example was not paying sent to create an the time frame.
    tobacco crops, wasn’t expedition and
    able to pay tribute and observation to what is Tavera believed that
    often ask to render happening here in the the Spanish friars and
    forced labors. Philippines. Izquierdo used the
    Cavite Mutiny as a
    Although him powerful lever by
    considered as a primary Jose Montero y magnifying it as a full-
    source, he still have this Vidal, was known as a blown conspiracy
    instances of committing prolific Spanish involving not only the
    favoring statements on historian documented native army but also
    one side of the opposing the event and included residents of
    groups. He was known highlighted it as an Cavite and Manila, and
    as a Spanish governor, attempt of the Indios to more importantly the
    and also known for overthrow the Spanish native clergy to
    being biased towards government in the overthrow the Spanish
    the Spanish men.That’s Philippines.  government in the
    the reason why he Philippines.
    acclaimed that the Vidal’s work was
    following mutiny were considered as a the most He identified such
    all trying ti overthrow conclusive and known reasons for the
    and cease to exist the to be as the most occurrence of the
    Spanish government credible as this mutiny. And that was
    occupying Cavite. compliments the work the way how did Pardo
    However in the end of Gov. Izquierdo. De Tavera claimed that
    Governor Izquierdo they were not originally
    took offense to it Although aiming for a said revolt.
    Izquierdo’s and Vidal’s
    Governor work compliments each What do they freally
    Ezquierdo almost has other Vidal’s work was want was to express teir
    the same content of more acclaimed as it disappointments due to
    account with Vidal”s presents a complete and the unequal transactions
    work. The problem detailed information with Spanish men.
    there was he was noteb that was all necessary to Originally it was
    to be biased upon his make it justified and expressed as a strike to
    account and that was a informative. express the
    big turn around in discontentment towards

    You might also like