W3 - Module 003 The Moral Agent - Moral Standards and Human Freedom

Module 3 Moral Standards and Human Freedom
At the end of this module, you are expected t0:

1. To understand moral standards in relation to human life
2. To learn the issue of voluntariness in human acts
Moral Standards
Morality it must be noted, is present only in humanity. Meaning man can only be moral if he
is fully aware of his actions. Brutes have no morality for they are not guided by reason hence they
are not responsible for their actions and are not classified as human acts. Let us be guided based
on these principles:
1. Man is the only Moral Being – due to three things: a) man is capable of action, b) man
has intellect and c) man has free will. Being capable of action man can employ his bodily
activities to perform actions. With man’s intellect he can discern the good or evilness of
his actions and at the same time equate the repercussions of his actions once asked to
justify them. Free will is present and inherent in men unless they ar e idiots and with
that they have the freedom of choice whether to perform or not the action at hand.
2. Man is a the highest form of Animal – endowed with intellect, man can decide what’s
best for him although their desires are the same with brutes such as h unger, thirst, pain
and sensual needs; man moves based on reason while their lower counterparts have
only instinct. Sentient beings like animals rely on instinct which are natural biological
drives, while men can decide whether an act is moral or not.
3. Man is a rational animal – Ratio is the Latin term for reason that means man has the
power to discern things based on his previous knowledge of things. Unlike brutes, man
has the power of abstraction – this is his ability to correlate ideas previously based on
his mind as well as his understanding of the situation at hand, thereby giving him a
logical or correct decision.
4. The intellect and the will – they are correlative with each other because the intellect is
the agent of knowing while the will is the agent of choice. From intellect – knowledge is
stored this will then guide the will to decide which is basically “good”. They co-exist and
from their partnership “virtue” is born.
Voluntariness of Human Acts

A voluntary act is under the control of the intellect and the will and must be answerable for
their actions. As mentioned in the previous module, only human acts are valid in ethics and at the
same time possess moral significance. There are four types of voluntary acts and they are:
Course Module
1. Perfect voluntariness – when a person acts with full knowledge and complete freedom –
we are fully aware of what we are doing
2. Imperfect voluntariness – when a person acts without full understanding and no
freedom – we are made to perform acts we did not like
3. Simple voluntariness – it is the disposition of a person doing the activity regardless to
his liking or not – this may be positive or negative. The former is by making him to do
something while the other is to prevent or stop him from doing things.
4. Conditional voluntariness - it is the situation when the person was forced by
circumstances or under duress which he would not do under normal circumstances.
Example is being extorted money by a neighborhood toughie in exchange for his
“protection”.
But what modifiers may cloud the intellect and the will that may either reduce or increase
accountability:
Modifiers of Human Acts:

1. Ignorance – this simply means absence of knowledge. A doer’s responsibility for his
actions may be increased or decreased due to this. A person may have committed an act
for he is unaware of it. There are three types of ignorance and they are: Vincible
ignorance that can easily be corrected such as calling a person with a wrong name or
entering the wrong classroom. On the other hand Invincible ignorance – cannot be
rectified an example is a waiter who gave the wrong food to the customer or a killer
that claimed the life of a wrong victim. The third is Affected ignorance – is the doer’s
attempt to escape responsibility such as a suspect denying his complicity in a crime he
has done.
2. Passions – Psychic responses that may adhere or abhor them to either desirable or
undesirable tendencies. Positive emotions such as love, desire or hope are
manifestations of the first while hatred, horror and despair are example of negative
emotions. There are also two passions such as antecedent and consequent passions
wherein the former are passions that occur before the stimulus such as accidentally
meeting a special someone; while the other came after a stimuli we ourselves caused
for example meeting a special someone that we are already aware of his arrival.
3. Fear – it is the disturbance of the mind when confronted by danger to himself or a loved
one. Actions whether done with fear or out of fear may affect one’s action. Acts done
with fear are voluntary while acts done out of fear are two different things. If one moves
with fear this means he has to decide and yet is afraid he might err an example is an
amateur singer performing in front of a large crowd or driving a vehicle with limited
know-how in driving. Actions out of fear are situations that needed immediate
decisions such as jumping out of a plane about to crash land or run away from a violent
situation.
4. Violence – it is physical force given to a free person to coerce him to do or not to do
something. Physical threats such as torture, starvation or mutilation are examples of
violence but was free will impaired? No, the free will is still there for they can still resist
making their moral integrity intact, in short, there is still a choice.
5. Habits – readiness to perform habitual acts. Habits are done mechanically that thinking
is no longer necessary may either be good or bad. It is second-nature to the doer and
doing it is instinct.
References and Supplementary Materials

Books and Journals
1. Agapay, Ramon B.; Ethics and the Filipinos; Mandaluyong Metro Manila, National
Book Store Inc.
2. Babor, Eddie R.; Ethics – The Philosophical Discipline of Action; Manile, Rex Book
Store
3. Montemayor, Felix; Ethics the Philippines; Navotas Metro Manila; National Book
Store
Written by:
Christopher S. Espiritu
AMACC Caloocan Campus
Course Module

W3 - Module 003 The Moral Agent - Moral Standards and Human Freedom

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

W3 - Module 003 The Moral Agent - Moral Standards and Human Freedom

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

W3 - Module 003 The Moral Agent - Moral Standards and Human Freedom

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Module 3 Moral Standards and Human Freedom

At the end of this module, you are expected t0:

Voluntariness of Human Acts

Modifiers of Human Acts:

References and Supplementary Materials

You might also like