Emergency Preparedness and Response in Metallurgical Processes
Emergency Preparedness and Response in Metallurgical Processes
Emergency Preparedness and Response in Metallurgical Processes
The main aim of the presented paper is to feature the operational model of the emergency preparedness and re-
sponse. It is based on the risk analysis and allows for fulfillment of the requirements of ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and ISO
45001 norms. The model in question represents the base of the real aims’ unification within the range of proceeding
in case of the metallurgical processes’ failures.
Key words: metallurgy, production, emergency preparedness, emergency response, risk analysis
gency response is implementation of the developed The emergency preparedness is dedicated towards
method of risk assessment of the calculation character. minimization of the risk concerning the probability of the
The guidelines for risk assessment, which can be used as emergency. The emergency response is targeted at mini-
an element of emergency response, have been described mizing the risk connected with the threats resulting in the
in the following scientific papers [13-15] as the subject of occurrence of the influences on the environment as well
the author’s study. as the occupational diseases and the accidents at the
Emergency preparedness and response has been pre- workplace. It remains both as the actions undertaken im-
pared as a tool for process’ safety assurance in the qual- mediately after the emergency and as the preventive
ity, environmental and occupational safety context, es- ones. In the case of the reactive character it is included in
pecially for every metallurgical process. the improvement phase. Than it has a significant impact
on limitation of the emergency risk by minimizing both:
RESULTS IN METALLURGICAL PROCESS probability of occurrence and significance of effects.
Emergency preparedness should be interpreted as
The model includes the organizational and techno-
the reduction of the probability of the emergency and its
logical solutions used by the organization both to prevent
effects occurrence (OS2 < O1) and the minimization of
and to react to the effects of occupational threats, quality
the risk of the emergency (RS1 < R1). In contrast, assur-
incompatibilities and environmental influences, which
ance of the supervised conditions during the emergency
have already occurred in the dangerous situations. Emer-
situation should be understood as the limitation of the
gency response should be implemented when emergency
effects of the emergency, in the meaning of effects sig-
preparedness, aimed at stopping the accident by monitor-
nificance (SS2 < SS1) and minimization of the risk of the
ing of the identified operational criteria, is insufficient
occurred emergency (RS2 < R1).
and the emergency happens, see Figure 1.
The influences of the emergency, being embodied in
The base for procedure of emergency preparedness
the organization despite the emergency preparedness
and response is risk assessment. It indicates tools and
and the actions undertaken for the sake of the emergen-
methods for processes’ control and supervision. It ena-
cy are the subject of the analysis being in the same time
bles to point the solutions appropriate for the process
the inputs for the improvement process. The new im-
and describes human and intangible resources as well as
proved solutions of the emergency actions are directed
documentation specific for the concrete emergency.
at the limitation of both: emergency influence signifi-
When, during realization of the process and assur-
cance (SS3 < SS2) and emergency influence occurrence
ance of the supervised conditions, the compatibility of
(OS3 < OS1) and finally – minimizing the risk of the po-
the operational criteria with the requirements is not
tential emergency (RS3 < RS1, RS3 < RS2).
guaranteed, the conditions of dangerous situation occur.
It should be underlined that the above-mentioned ac-
When the effects of the meaningful threats became the
tions shouldn’t be treated as the one time activities but
real ones, the response to the effects of the threats based
as the continuous and repeatable ones. Propositions of
on the quality, environmental and occupational health
the preparedness and response actions in the chosen
and safety criteria are needed.
metallurgical processes have been shown in the Table 1.
After-emergency response acts also as the re-active
monitoring including the analysis of organizational and
technical factors creating such process’ conditions as can CONCLUSIONS
cause the accident. The results of the analysis are crucial
for identification of possibilities of process’ improve- Harmonizing the management systems according to
ment and assessment of the risk connected with them. the HLS can be considered only a starting point for the
Figure 1 Model of the emergency preparedness and response including scheme of risk minimization.