Response of Linear Time-Invariant System To WSS Input: X T To An Output
Response of Linear Time-Invariant System To WSS Input: X T To An Output
Response of Linear Time-Invariant System To WSS Input: X T To An Output
In many applications, physical systems are modeled as linear time invariant (LTI)
systems. The dynamic behavior of an LTI system to deterministic inputs is described by
linear differential equations. We are familiar with time and transform domain (such as
Laplace transform and Fourier transform) techniques to solve these equations. In this
lecture, we develop the technique to analyze the response of an LTI system to WSS
random process.
y (t ) T x(t )
Linear system
The system is called linear if superposition applies: the weighted sum of inputs results in
the weighted sum of the corresponding outputs. Thus for a linear system
T a1 x1 t a2 x2 t a1T x1 t a2T x2 t
Consider a linear system with y(t) = T x(t). The system is called time-invariant if
T x t t 0 y t t0 t0
It is easy to check that that the differentiator in the above example is a linear time-
invariant system.
Causal system
The system is called causal if the output of the system at t t0 depends only on the
present and past values of input. Thus for a causal system
y t0 T x(t ), t t0
Response of a linear time-invariant system to deterministic input
A linear system can be characterised by its impulse response h(t ) T (t ) where (t ) is
the Dirac delta function.
x(n) LTI
system
Recall that any function x(t) can be represented in terms of the Dirac delta function as
follows
x(t ) x( ) t s
ds
x( s) T t s ds Using the linearity property
x( s ) h t , s
ds
X ( ) LTI System Y ( )
Y H X
where H FT h t h( t ) e
jt
dt is the frequency response of the system
Consider an LTI system with impulse response h(t). Suppose { X (t )} is a WSS process
input to the system. The output {Y (t )} of the system is given by
Y t h s X t s ds h t s X s ds
where we have assumed that the integrals exist in the mean square (m.s.) sense.
EY t E h s X t s ds
h s EX t s ds
h s
X ds
X
h s ds
X H 0
h t e h t dt
j t
H ( ) 0 dt
0
The Cross correlation of the input X(t) and the out put Y(t) is given by
E X t Y t E X t h s X t s ds
h s
E X t X t s ds
h s
RX s ds
h u
RX u du [ Put s u ]
h * RX
R XY h * R X
also RYX R XY h * R X
h * RX
Thus we see that RXY is a function of lag only. Therefore, X t and Y t are
jointly wide-sense stationary.
E Y t Y t E h s X t s dsY (t )
h s E X t s Y (t ) ds
h s R XY s ds
h( ) * R XY h( ) * h( ) * R X
Thus the autocorrelation of the output process Y t depends on the time-lag , i.e.,
EY t Y t RY .
Thus
RY RX * h * h
The above analysis indicates that for an LTI system with WSS input
(1) the output is WSS and
(2) the input and output are jointly WSS.
PY RY 0
RX 0 * h 0 * h 0
Power spectrum of the output process
Using the property of Fourier transform, we get the power spectral density of the output
process given by
SY S X H H *
SX H
2
S XY H * S X
and
SYX H S X
S XY ( ) SY ( ) R ( ) RY ( )
S X ( ) RX ( ) h( ) XY
H ( )
*
H ( ) h( )
Example:
N0
(a) White noise process X t with power spectral density is input to an ideal low
2
pass filter of band-width B. Find the PSD and autocorrelation function of the output
process.
H ( )
N
2
B B
N0
The input process X t is white noise with power spectral density S X .
2
SY H S X
2
N0
1 B B
2
N0
B B
2
The output PSD SY and the output autocorrelation function RY are illustrated in
Fig. below.
N0 SY ( )
2
B
O
B
Example 2:
A random voltage modeled by a white noise process X t with power spectral density
N0
is input to an RC network shown in the fig.
2
1
jC
H
1
R
jC
1
jRC 1
Therefore,
(a)
SY H S X
2
1
SX
R C 2 1
2 2
1 N0
2 2 2
R C 1 2
(b) Taking inverse Fourier transform
N 0 RC
RY e
4 RC