Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views17 pages

Beam-Columns: CE579 - Structural Stability and Design Amit H. Varma Ph. No. (765) 496 3419

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 17

Beam-Columns

CE579 - Structural Stability and Design


Amit H. Varma
Ph. No. (765) 496 3419
Email: ahvarma@purdue.edu
Beam-Columns

n Members subjected to bending & axial compression are called


beam-columns.

n Beam-columns in frames are usually subjected to end forces only.


However, beam-columns may also be subjected to transverse
forces in addition to end-forces.

n Behavior of beam-columns is similar somewhat to beams &


columns.
Beam-Columns

4.1 Force-deformation Behavior Ry


Ry MTX
z, w
P P
MBX v
L
x, u
y, v

M 0 = −M Bx "
Let, # change of variable, -1 ≤ κ ≤ 1
κ M 0 = M Tx $
Ry
Ry κM0
M0
P P
v

θ0 θL
Beam-Columns
Beam-Columns: Behavior

n Consider the experimental behavior of a wide-flange beam-column


subjected to P=0.49PY (concentric) & (increasing) with κ=0
Beam-Columns: Behavior

n Behavior of beam-columns is different than the behavior of beam


or column.

P < Pmax/column → Therefore, some reserve capacity to carry M


M<M p → Moment carried is less than M p because P ≠ 0
& M 0 / max for the beam-column is not maintained
through indefinite rotations
Beam-Columns: Behavior

n Note that for beams moment is reduced due to LTB or LB


buckling out-of-plane
n But, for the beam-column M 0 / max is reached due to in-plane
behavior only no LTB or LB before M 0 / max is reached
M0/L P z
M (z) = M 0 (1− ) + Pν
L

v
secondary moment
As M 0 increases, ν increases

increasing Pν
When member yields, ν increases more rapidly
M0/L
M0 ↓
P Pν increases at such a rate that it dominates
Beam-Columns: Behavior

n Note that for beams moment is reduced due to LTB or LB


buckling out-of-plane
n But, for the beam-column M 0 / max is reached due to in-plane
behavior only no LTB or LB before M 0 / max is reached
M0/L P z
M (z) = M 0 (1− ) + Pν
L

v
secondary moment
As M 0 increases, ν increases

increasing Pν
When member yields, ν increases more rapidly
M0/L
M0 ↓
P Pν increases at such a rate that it dominates
Beam-Columns: Behavior

n Consider, over all behavior


Beam-Columns: Differential Equations

4.2 Elastic Behavior


M By = M Ty = 0, M Bz = −M 0 & M Tz = κ M 0 , P = P

n 2nd order differential equations are:


z
EI xν ''+ Pν − Px0φ = M 0 [−1+ (1− κ )] → (1)
L
z
EI y u''+ Pu + M 0φ [1− (1− κ )]+ Py0φ = 0 → (2)
L
z
EI wφ '''− (GKT + K )φ '+ M 0 u'[1− (1− κ )]
L
M
+Py0 u'− Px0 v'+ 0 (1− κ )u = 0 → (3)
L

n Eq. (1), (2), & (3) are coupled. Eq. (1) is also coupled through.
n This means that for most general cross-sections with
x0 ≠ 0 & y0 ≠ 0 → applying P & M 0 → u, v & φ
Beam-Columns: Differential Equations

n For a singly symmetric cross-section with x0 = 0 & moments


acting in the plane of symmetry (y-z plane)

z
EI xν ''+ Pν = M 0 [−1+ (1− κ )] → (4)
L
z
EI y u''+ Pu + M 0φ [1− (1− κ )]+ Py0φ = 0 → (5)
L
z
EI wφ '''− (GKT + K )φ '+ M 0 u'[1− (1− κ )]
0 L
M
+Py0 u'− Px0 v'+ 0 (1− κ )u = 0 → (6)
L
Beam-Columns: Differential Equations
n Differentiating these equations
EI xν iv + Pν '' = 0 → (7)
z 2M 0
EI y uiv + Pu''+ M 0 [1− (1− κ )]φ ''− (1− κ )φ '+ Py0φ '' = 0 → (8)
L L
z
EI wφ iv − (GKT + K )φ ''− K ' φ '+ M 0 [1− (1− κ )]u''+Py0 u'' = 0 → (9)
L
The value of K = ∫ σ a 2 dA %'
P M y
A &σ = − + x
A Ix
(10) →∴ K = −Pr02 + M x β x '(

Column Beam
z
Where, M x = M 0 (1− (1− κ )) → moment within the span of b.c.
L
∴Eq (9) can be written as
(1− κ )
EI wφ iv − (GKT − Pr02 + M x β x )φ ''+ M 0 β xφ ' + M x u''+Py0 u'' = 0 → (11)
L
Beam-Columns: Differential Equations

n Now the final equations are (7), (8) & (11).


Where, Eq. (7) is uncoupled from eq. (8) & (11).
n Eq. (7) defines the in-plane bending deformations
n Eq. (8) & (11) correspond to the occurrence of LTB.
In-Plane Behavior of Beam-Columns

4.2.1 IN-PLANE behavior & strength


Solve for constants of intigrations:
M 0 " κ − cos(Fv L) z %
ν= $( )sin(Fv z) + cos(Fv z) + (1− κ ) −1' → (14)
P # sin(Fv L) L &
∴bending moment at any point z is computed as:
" κ − cos(Fv L) %
M = −EI xν '' = M 0 $( )sin(Fv z) + cos(Fv z)' → (15)
# sin(Fv L) &
max. moment location & value
dM " κ − cos(Fv L) %
= 0 ∴ M 0 $( )cos(Fv z) − sin(Fv z)' = 0
dz # sin(Fv L) &
So max. moment occurs when
κ − cos(Fv L)
tan(Fv z) = → (16)
sin(Fv L)
In-Plane Behavior of Beam-Columns

corresponding M max = M 0 [tan(Fv z)sin(Fv z) + cos(Fv z)]


which can be simplified to M max = M 0φ → (17)
1
where, φ =
cos(Fv z)
1+ κ 2 − 2κ cos(Fv L)
∴φ =
sin(Fv L)
1+ κ 2 − 2κ cos(Fv L)
∴ M max = M 0 → (18)
sin(Fv L)
In-Plane Behavior of Beam-Columns
n Thus, for a beam-column subjected to P & M
In-Plane Behavior of Beam-Columns
sin(Fv L)
Location z from: cos(Fv z) = → (19)
2
1+ κ − 2κ cos(Fv L)
16 may result in values of z that are negative
Eq. (19)
→ This means that M max does not occur in 0 ≤ z ≤ L and
M 0 is the max. moment for the beam-column
→ When does M max occur within the span
If κ ≤≥ cos(Fv L) → then φ =1.0 (M max out span)
If κ ≥
≤ cos(Fv L) → then φ =Eq.(18) (M max in span)
π 2 EI x
Another limitting situation, When P = Pcr =
L2
M
then, no moment can be applied ∴ M 0 = max = 0
φ
∴φ = ∞
∴sin(Fv L) = 0
∴(Fv L)max = π → (20)

You might also like