Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Chandrayaan 2 Wikipedia

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 148

Chandrayaan-2

Chandrayaan-2 (candra-yāna,
transl. "mooncraft";
pronunciation (help·info)) is the
second lunar exploration mission
developed by the Indian Space Research
Organisation (ISRO), after Chandrayaan-
1. As of September 2019, it consists of a
lunar orbiter, and also included the
Vikram lander, and the Pragyan lunar
rover, all of which were developed in
India. The main scientific objective is to
map and study the variations in lunar
surface composition, as well as the
location and abundance of lunar water.
Chandrayaan-2

Chandrayaan-2 composite

Mission type Lunar orbiter, lander,


rover

Operator Indian Space


Research
Organisation (ISRO)

COSPAR ID 2019-042A

SATCAT no. 44441


Website www.isro.gov.in
/chandrayaan2-
home-0

Mission duration Orbiter: ~ 7 years


Elapsed:
11 months, 5 days
Vikram lander: ≤ 14
days
(planned);[1][2]
Achieved: 0 days
(landing failure)
Pragyan rover: ≤ 14
days (planned);[2]
Achieved: 0 days
(landing failure)

Spacecraft properties
Manufacturer Indian Space
Research
Organisation (ISRO)
Launch mass Combined (wet):
3,850 kg
(8,490 lb)[3][4][5]
Combined (dry):
1,308 kg (2,884 lb)[6]
Orbiter (wet):
2,379 kg
(5,245 lb)[4][5]
Orbiter (dry): 682 kg
(1,504 lb)[6]
Vikram lander (wet):
1,471 kg
(3,243 lb)[4][5]
Vikram lander (dry):
626 kg (1,380 lb)[6]
Pragyan rover: 27 kg
(60 lb)[4][5]

Power Orbiter: 1 kW


(1.3 hp)[7]

Vikram lander: 650


W[8]

Pragyan rover: 50
W[8]

Start of mission

Launch date 22 July 2019,


14:43:12 IST
(09:13:12 UTC)[9]

Rocket GSLV Mark III


M1[10][11]
Launch site Satish Dhawan
Space Centre
Second Launch Pad
Contractor Indian Space
Research
Organisation (ISRO)

Moon orbiter

Orbital insertion 20 August 2019,


09:02 IST (03:32
UTC)[12][13]

Orbital parameters

Pericynthion altitude 100 km (62 mi)[14]

Apocynthion altitude 100 km (62 mi)[14]

Moon lander

Spacecraft Rover
component
Landing date 7 September 2019,
01:53 IST (failure)
(6 September 2019,
20:23 UTC)[13][15]
Landing site Lunar south pole
(intended)

Chandrayaan programme
 

The spacecraft was launched on its


mission to the Moon from the second
launch pad at the Satish Dhawan Space
Centre in Andhra Pradesh on 22 July
2019 at 2.43 p.m. IST (09:13 UTC) by a
GSLV Mark III M1. The craft reached the
Moon's orbit on 20 August 2019 and
began orbital positioning manoeuvres
for the landing of the Vikram lander. The
lander and the rover were scheduled to
land on the near side of the Moon, in the
south polar region at a latitude of about
70° south on 6 September 2019 and
conduct scientific experiments for one
lunar day, which approximates to two
Earth weeks. A successful soft landing
would have made India the fourth
country after the Soviet Union, United
States and China to do so.

However, the lander deviated from its


intended trajectory while attempting to
land on 6 September 2019 which caused
a 'hard landing'. According to a failure
analysis report submitted to ISRO, the
crash was caused by a software glitch.
ISRO may re-attempt a landing by the
second quarter of 2021 with
Chandrayaan-3.

History
On 12 November 2007, representatives
of the Roscosmos and ISRO signed an
agreement for the two agencies to work
together on the Chandrayaan-1's follow-
up project, Chandrayaan-2.[16][17] ISRO
would have the prime responsibility for
the orbiter and rover, while Roscosmos
was to provide the lander. The Indian
government approved the mission in a
meeting of the Union Cabinet, held on 18
September 2008 and chaired by Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh.[18] The
design of the spacecraft was completed
in August 2009, with scientists of both
countries conducting a joint
review.[19][20]

Although ISRO finalised the payload for


Chandrayaan-2 on schedule,[21] the
mission was postponed in January 2013
and rescheduled to 2016 because
Russia was unable to develop the lander
on time.[22][23][24] In 2012, there was a
delay in the construction of the Russian
lander for Chandrayaan-2 due of the
failure of the Fobos-Grunt mission to
Mars, since the technical issues
connected with the Fobos-Grunt mission
which were also used in the lunar
projects including the lander for
Chandrayaan-2 needed to be
reviewed.[23] When Russia cited its
inability to provide the lander even by
2015, India decided to develop the lunar
mission independently.[22][25]

The spacecraft's launch had been


scheduled for March 2018 initially after
the India's decision, but was first delayed
to April and then to October to conduct
further tests on the vehicle.[26][27] On 19
June 2018, after the program's fourth
Comprehensive Technical Review
meeting, a number of changes in
configuration and landing sequence
were planned for implementation,
pushing the launch to the first half of
2019.[28] Two of the lander's legs
received minor damage during one of
the tests in February 2019.[29]

Chandrayaan-2 launch was scheduled


for 14 July 2019, 21:21 UTC (15 July 2019
at 02:51 IST local time), with the landing
expected on 6 September 2019.[30]
However, the launch was aborted due to
a technical glitch and was
rescheduled.[9][31][32] The launch
occurred on 22 July 2019 at 09:13 UTC
(14:43 IST) on the first operational flight
of a GSLV MK III M1.[33]

On 6 September 2019, the lander during


its landing phase, deviated from its
intended trajectory starting at 2.1
kilometres (1.3 mi) altitude,[34] and had
lost communication when touchdown
confirmation was expected.[35][36] Initial
reports suggesting a crash[37][38] were
confirmed by ISRO chairman K. Sivan,
stating that "it must have been a hard
landing".[39] The Failure Analysis
Committee concluded that the crash
was caused by a software glitch.[40]
Unlike ISRO's previous record, the report
of the Failure Analysis Committee has
not been made public.[41]

Objectives
The primary objectives of the
Chandrayaan-2 lander were to
demonstrate the ability to soft-land and
operate a robotic rover on the lunar
surface.

The scientific goals of the orbiter are:


to study lunar topography, mineralogy,
elemental abundance, the lunar
exosphere, and signatures of hydroxyl
and water ice[42][43]
to study the water ice in the south
polar region and thickness of the lunar
regolith on the surface[44]
to map the lunar surface and help to
prepare 3D maps of it

Design
The name Chandrayaan means
"mooncraft" in Sanskrit and Hindi.[45][46]
The mission was launched on a
Geosynchronous Satellite Launch
Vehicle Mark III (GSLV Mk III) M1 with an
approximate lift-off mass of 3,850 kg
(8,490 lb) from Satish Dhawan Space
Centre on Sriharikota Island of Andhra
Pradesh.[3][11][14][47] As of June 2019, the
mission has an allocated cost of ₹
9.78 billion (approximately
US$141 million) which includes ₹ 6 billion
for the space segment and ₹ 3.75 billion
as launch costs on GSLV Mk III M1.[48][49]
Chandrayaan-2 stack was initially put in
an Earth parking orbit of 170 kilometres
(110 mi) perigee and 40,400 kilometres
(25,100 mi) apogee by the launch
vehicle.[50]
Orbiter ...

Chandrayaan-2 orbiter at integration facility

The Chandrayaan-2 orbiter is orbiting the


Moon on a polar orbit at an altitude of
100 km (62 mi).[51] It carries eight
scientific instruments; two of which are
improved versions of those flown on
Chandrayaan-1. The approximate launch
mass was 2,379 kg (5,245 lb).[4][5][21][52]
The Orbiter High Resolution Camera
(OHRC) conducted high-resolution
observations of the landing site prior to
separation of the lander from the
orbiter.[2][51] The orbiter's structure was
manufactured by Hindustan Aeronautics
Limited and delivered to the ISRO
Satellite Centre on 22 June 2015.[53][54]

Dimensions: 3.2 × 5.8 × 2.2 m[8]


Gross lift-off mass: 2,379 kg
(5,245 lb)[3]
Propellant mass: 1,697 kg (3,741 lb)[6]
Dry mass: 682 kg (1,504 lb)[6]
Power generation capacity: 1000 W[8]
Mission duration: approximately 7.5
years, extended from the planned 1
year owing to the precise launch and
mission management, in lunar
orbit[1][55]

Vikram lander ...

Rover Pragyan mounted on the ramp of Vikram


lander
Play media

Images of the Earth captured by Chandrayaan-2


Vikram lander camera LI4[56]

The mission's lander is called Vikram


(Sanskrit: व म, lit. 'Valour'[57])
Pronunciation (help·info) named after
Vikram Sarabhai (1919–1971), who is
widely regarded as the founder of the
Indian space programme.[58] The Vikram
lander detached from the orbiter and
descended to a low lunar orbit of 30 km
× 100 km (19 mi × 62 mi) using its 800 N
(180 lbf) liquid main engines. After
checking all of its on-board systems it
attempted a soft landing that would have
deployed the rover, and performed
scientific activities for approximately 14
Earth days. Vikram crash-landed during
this attempt.[1][37] The combined mass of
the lander and rover was approximately
1,471 kg (3,243 lb).[4][5]

The preliminary configuration study of


the lander was completed in 2013 by the
Space Applications Centre (SAC) in
Ahmedabad.[22] The lander's propulsion
system consisted of eight 50 N (11 lbf)
thrusters for attitude control and five
800 N (180 lbf) liquid main engines
derived from ISRO's 440 N (99 lbf) liquid
apogee motor.[59][60] Initially, the lander
design employed four main throttle-able
liquid engines, but a centrally mounted
fixed-thrust engine[61] was added to
handle new requirements of having to
orbit the Moon before landing. The
additional engine was expected to
mitigate upward draft of lunar dust
during the soft landing.[47] Vikram was
designed to safely land on slopes up to
12°.[62][63]

Some associated technologies include a


high resolution camera, Laser Altimeter
(LASA),[64] Lander Hazard Detection
Avoidance Camera (LHDAC), Lander
Position Detection Camera (LPDC),[65]
Lander Horizontal Velocity Camera
(LHVC), an 800 N throttleable liquid main
engine,[53] attitude thrusters, Ka band
radio altimeters,[66][67] Laser Inertial
Reference & Accelerometer Package
(LIRAP),[68] and the software needed to
run these components.[2][51] Engineering
models of the lander began undergoing
ground and aerial tests in late October
2016, in Challakere in the Chitradurga
district of Karnataka. ISRO created
roughly 10 craters on the surface to help
assess the ability of the lander's sensors
to select a landing site.[69][70]

Dimensions: 2.54 by 2 by 1.2 metres


(8 ft 4 in × 6 ft 7 in × 3 ft 11 in)[8]
Gross lift-off mass: 1,471 kg
(3,243 lb)[3]
Propellant mass: 845 kg (1,863 lb)[6]
Dry mass: 626 kg (1,380 lb)[6]
Power generation capability: 650 W
Mission duration: ≤14 days (one lunar
day)[2]

Pragyan rover ...


Pragyan rover of the Chandrayaan-2 mission

The mission's rover was called Pragyan


(Sanskrit: ान, lit. 'Wisdom'[71][72])
Pronunciation (help·info))[71][73] with a
mass of 27 kg (60 lb), and would have
operated on solar power.[4][5] The rover
was to move on six wheels, traversing
500 metres (1,600 ft) on the lunar
surface at the rate of 1 centimetre
(0.39 in) per second, perform on-site
analyses and send the data to the
lander, which would have relayed it to
the Mission Control on the
Earth.[21][48][52][74][75] For navigation, the
rover would have used:

Stereoscopic camera-based 3D
vision: two 1 megapixel,
monochromatic navcams in front of
the rover to provide the ground control
team a 3D view of the surrounding
terrain, and help in path-planning by
generating a digital elevation model of
the terrain.[76] IIT Kanpur contributed to
the development of the subsystems
for light-based map generation and
motion planning for the rover.[77]
Control and motor dynamics: the rover
has a rocker-bogie suspension system
and six wheels, each driven by
independent brushless DC electric
motors. Steering is accomplished by
differential speed of the wheels or skid
steering.[78]

The expected operating time of Pragyan


rover was one lunar day, or around 14
Earth days, as its electronics were not
designed to endure the frigid lunar night.
However, its power system has a solar-
powered sleep/wake-up cycle
implemented, which could have resulted
in longer service time than
planned.[79][80] Two aft wheels of the
rover had the ISRO logo and the State
Emblem of India embossed on them to
leave behind patterned tracks on the
lunar surface.[81][82]

Dimensions: 0.9 × 0.75 × 0.85 m[8]


Power: 50 W[8]
Travel speed: 1 cm/sec[8]
Mission duration: ≤14 days (one lunar
day)

Science payload
Mission overview

ISRO selected eight scientific


instruments for the orbiter, four for the
lander,[3][83][84] and two for the rover.[21]
While it was initially reported that NASA
and ESA would participate in the mission
by providing some scientific instruments
for the orbiter,[85] ISRO in 2010 had
clarified that due to weight restrictions it
will not be carrying foreign payloads on
the mission.[86] However, in an update a
month before launch,[87] an agreement
between NASA and ISRO was signed to
include a small laser retroreflector from
NASA to the lander's payload to
measure the distance between the
satellites above and the microreflector
on the lunar surface.[88][89]

Orbiter ...

Payloads on the orbiter are:[1][3][84]

Chandrayaan-2 Large Area Soft X-ray


Spectrometer (CLASS) from the ISRO
Satellite Centre (ISAC), which makes
use of X-ray fluorescence spectra to
determine the elemental composition
of the lunar surface[90]
Solar X-ray monitor (XSM) from
Physical Research Laboratory (PRL),
Ahmedabad, for mapping the lunar
surface[21][91]
Dual Frequency L and S band
Synthetic Aperture Radar (DFSAR)
from the Space Applications Centre
(SAC) for probing the first few metres
of the lunar surface for the presence of
different constituents. DFSAR was
expected to provide further evidence
confirming the presence of water ice,
and its distribution below the
shadowed regions of the Moon.[21][92]
It has lunar surface penetration depth
of 5 metres (16 ft) (L-band).[55][84]
Imaging IR Spectrometer (IIRS) from
the SAC for mapping of lunar surface
over a wide wavelength range for the
study of minerals, water molecules
and hydroxyl present.[21][93] It featured
an extended spectral range (0.8 μm to
5 μm), an improvement over previous
lunar missions whose payloads
worked up to 3 μm.[55][94][95]
Chandrayaan-2 Atmospheric
Compositional Explorer 2 (ChACE-
2)[96] Quadrupole Mass Analyzer from
Space Physics Laboratory (SPL) to
carry out a detailed study of the lunar
exosphere[21]
Terrain Mapping Camera-2 (TMC-2)
from SAC for preparing a three-
dimensional map essential for
studying the lunar mineralogy and
geology[21][97]
Radio Anatomy of Moon Bound
Hypersensitive Ionosphere and
Atmosphere – Dual Frequency Radio
Science experiment (RAMBHA-DFRS)
by SPL for the studying electron
density in the lunar ionosphere[98]
Orbiter High Resolution Camera
(OHRC) by SAC for scouting a hazard-
free spot prior to landing. Used to help
prepare high-resolution topographic
maps and digital elevation models of
the lunar surface. OHRC had a spatial
resolution of 0.32 metres (1 ft 1 in)
from 100 kilometres (62 mi) polar
orbit, which was the best resolution
among any lunar orbiter mission to
date.[84][99][100][101]

Vikram lander ...

The payloads on the Vikram lander


were:[3][84]
Instrument for Lunar Seismic Activity
(ILSA) MEMS based seismometer by
LEOS for studying Moon-quakes near
the landing site[14][83][102][103]
Chandra's Surface Thermo-physical
Experiment (ChaSTE) thermal probe
by SPL, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre
(VSSC) for estimating the thermal
properties of the lunar surface[14]
RAMBHA-LP Langmuir probe by SPL,
VSSC for measuring the density and
variation of lunar surface plasma[14][83]
A laser retroreflector array (LRA) by the
Goddard Space Flight Center for
taking precise measurements of
distance between the reflector on the
lunar surface and satellites in lunar
orbit.[87][88][104][105] The microreflector
weighed about 22 grams and cannot
be used for taking observations from
Earth-based lunar laser stations.[88]

Pragyan rover ...

Pragyan rover carried two instruments to


determine the abundance of elements
near the landing site:[3][84]

Laser induced Breakdown


Spectroscope (LIBS) from the
laboratory for Electro Optic Systems
(LEOS), Bangalore[21][106]
Alpha Particle Induced X-ray
Spectroscope (APXS) from PRL,
Ahmedabad[107][108][109]

CHA XSM CLASS ILSA MEMS Laser


CE2 sensor retroreflect
package or array
(LRA)

LIBS APXS ChaS


TE

Mission profile
Animation of Chandrayaan-2

Geocentric phase Selenocentric


phase

Lunar landing Overall motion of


phase Chandrayaan-2

    Earth ·     Moon ·     Chandrayaan-2

Launch ...
Chandrayaan-2 lifting off on 22 July 2019 at 2.43
PM IST

The launch of Chandrayaan-2 was


initially scheduled for 14 July 2019, 21:21
UTC (15 July 2019 at 02:51 IST local
time).[30] However, the launch was
aborted 56 minutes and 24 seconds
before launch due to a technical glitch,
so it was rescheduled to 22 July
2019.[9][31] Unconfirmed reports later
cited a leak in the nipple joint of a helium
gas bottle as the cause of
cancellation.[32][110][111]

Finally Chandrayaan-2 was launched on


board the GSLV MK III M1 launch vehicle
on 22 July 2019 at 09:13 UTC (14:43 IST)
with a better-than-expected apogee as
a result of the cryogenic upper stage
being burned to depletion, which later
eliminated the need for one of the
apogee-raising burns during the
geocentric phase of mission.[33][112][113]
This also resulted in the saving of around
40 kg fuel on board the spacecraft.[114]
Immediately after launch, multiple
observations of a slow-moving bright
object over Australia were made, which
could be related to upper stage venting
of residual LOX/LH2 propellant after the
main burn.[115][116]

Geocentric phase ...

Chandrayaan-2's trajectory
After being placed into a 45,475 ×
169 km parking orbit by the launch
vehicle,[33] the Chandrayaan-2
spacecraft stack gradually raised its orbit
using on-board propulsion over 22 days.
In this phase, one perigee-raising and
five apogee-raising burns were
performed to reach a highly eccentric
orbit of 142,975 × 276 km[117] followed
by trans-lunar injection on 13 August
2019.[118] Such a long Earth-bound
phase with multiple orbit-raising
manoeuvres exploiting the Oberth effect
was required because of the limited
lifting capacity of the launch vehicle and
thrust of the spacecraft's on-board
propulsion system. A similar strategy
was used for Chandrayaan-1 and the
Mars Orbiter Mission during their Earth-
bound phase trajectory.[119] On 3 August
2019, the first set of Earth images were
captured by the LI4 camera on the
Vikram lander, showing the North
American landmass.[56]

Selenocentric phase ...

After 29 days from its launch, the


Chandrayaan-2 spacecraft stack
entered lunar orbit on 20 August 2019
after performing a lunar orbit insertion
burn for 28 minutes 57 seconds.[120] The
three-spacecraft stack was placed into
an elliptical orbit that passed over the
polar regions of the Moon, with
18,072 km (11,229 mi) aposelene and
114 km (71 mi) periselene.[121] By 1
September 2019 this elliptical orbit was
made nearly circular with 127 km (79 mi)
aposelene and 119 km (74 mi)
periselene after four orbit-lowering
manoeuvres[122][123][124][125] followed by
separation of Vikram lander from the
orbiter on 7:45 UTC, 2 September
2019.[126]

Planned landing site ...


Landing site[127] Coordinates

Prime landing site 70.90267°S 22.78110°E

Alternate landing site 67.87406°S 18.46947°W

The flat highland between craters Manzinus C and


Simpelius N was the planned landing zone for the
Vikram lander.

Two landing sites were selected, each


with an ellipse of 32 by 11 kilometres
(19.9 mi × 6.8 mi).[127] The prime landing
site (PLS54) was at 70.90267°S
22.78110°E (600 km (370 mi) from the
south pole[128]), and the alternate
landing site (ALS01) was at 67.87406°S
18.46947°W. The prime site was on a
high plain between the craters Manzinus
C and Simpelius N,[129][130] on the near
side of the Moon.

Loss of Vikram ...

Location of the Vikram lander impact site

Ejecta field
Ejecta field
around Vikram
lander impact
site

Before and
after image of
the impact site

Before and
after images of
the impact site
Vikram began its descent at 20:08:03
UTC, 6 September 2019 and was
scheduled to land on the Moon at
around 20:23 UTC. The descent and
soft-landing were to be performed by
the on-board computers on Vikram, with
mission control unable to make
corrections.[131] The initial descent was
considered within mission parameters,
passing critical braking procedures as
expected, but the lander's trajectory
began to deviate at about 2.1 kilometres
(1.3 mi; 6,900 ft) above the
surface.[132][133] The final telemetry
readings during ISRO's live-stream show
that Vikram 's final vertical velocity was
58 m/s (210 km/h) at 330 metres
(1,080 ft) above the surface, which a
number of experts noted, would have
been too fast for the lunar lander to
make a successful landing.[35][134][135]
Initial reports suggesting a crash[37][38]
were confirmed by ISRO chairman K.
Sivan, stating that "it must have been a
hard landing".[39][136][137]

Radio transmissions from the lander


were tracked during descent by analysts
using a 25-metre (82 ft) radio telescope
owned by the Netherlands Institute for
Radio Astronomy. Analysis of the
doppler data suggests that the loss of
signal coincided with the lander
impacting the lunar surface at a velocity
of nearly 50 m/s (180 km/h) (as
opposed to an ideal 2 m/s (7.2 km/h)
touchdown velocity).[3][138] The powered
descent was also observed by NASA's
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)
using its Lyman-Alpha Mapping Project
instrument to study changes in the lunar
exosphere due to exhaust gases from
the lander's engines.[139] K. Sivan,
tasked senior scientist P. S. Goel to head
the Failure Analysis Committee to look
into the causes of the failure.[140]
Both ISRO and NASA attempted to
communicate with the lander for about
two weeks before the lunar night set
in,[101][141] while NASA's LRO flew over
on 17 September 2019 and acquired
some images of the intended landing
zone.[142] However, the region was near
dusk, causing poor lighting for optical
imaging.[143][144] NASA's LRO images,
showing no sight of the lander, were
released on 26 September.[128] The LRO
flew over again on 14 October under
more favorable lighting
conditions,[145][146] but was unable to
locate it.[147][148] The LRO performed a
third flyover on 10 November.[147]
On 16 November 2019, the Failure
Analysis Committee released its report to
the Space Commission, concluding that
the crash was caused by a software
glitch.[40] Phase One of descent from an
altitude of 30 km to 7.4 km above the
Moon's surface went as intended with
velocity being reduced from 1,683 m/s
to 146 m/s. But velocity reduction during
the second phase of descent was more
than expected. This deviation from
nominal was beyond the designed
parameters of on-board software,[149]
causing Vikram to land hard, though it
managed to impact relatively near the
intended landing site.[150] The complete
findings have not been made
public.[151][152][153]

Vikram 's impact site was located at


70.8810°S 22.7840°E by the LROC team
after receiving helpful input from
Shanmuga Subramanian, a volunteer
from Chennai, Tamil Nadu, who located
debris from the spacecraft in pictures
released by NASA.[154][155] While initially
estimated to be within 500 metres
(1,600 ft) of the intended landing site,
best-guess estimates from satellite
imagery indicate initial impact about 600
m away.[156] The spacecraft shattered
upon impact,[157] with debris scattered
over almost two dozen locations in an
area spanning kilometres.[155]

The orbiter part of the mission, with eight


scientific instruments, remains
operational, and will continue its seven-
year mission to study the Moon.[133]
Timeline of operations[158][159]
Result
Phase Date Event Detail Apogee / Perigee / Referen
Aposelene Periselene

22 July
2019 Burn time: 16 min 45,475 km 169.7 km [33]
Launch
09:13:12 14 sec (28,257 mi) (105.4 mi)
UTC

24 July 1st orbit-


45,163 km 230 km [160]
2019 raising Burn time: 48 sec
(28,063 mi) (140 mi)
09:22 UTC maneuver

25 July 2nd orbit-


54,829 km 251 km [161]
2019 raising Burn time: 883 sec
(34,069 mi) (156 mi)
19:38 UTC maneuver

Geocentric 29 July 3rd orbit-


71,792 km 276 km [162]
phase 2019 raising Burn time: 989 sec
(44,609 mi) (171.5 mi)
09:42 UTC maneuver

2 August 4th orbit-


89,472 km 277 km [163]
2019 raising Burn time: 646 sec
(55,595 mi) (172 mi)
09:57 UTC maneuver

6 August 5th orbit-


Burn time: 1041 142,975 km 276 km [117]
2019 raising
sec (88,841 mi) (171 mi)
09:34 UTC maneuver

13 August
Trans-lunar Burn time: 1203 [118]
2019 — —
injection sec
20:51 UTC

Selenocentric Lunar orbit


phase 20 August insertion
Burn time: 1738 18,072 km 114 km [121]
2019 1st lunar
sec (11,229 mi) (71 mi)
03:32 UTC bound
maneuver

21 August 2nd lunar Burn time: 1228 4,412 km 118 km [122]

2019 bound sec (2,741 mi) (73 mi)


07:20 UTC maneuver

28 August 3rd lunar


Burn time: 1190 1,412 km 179 km [123]
2019 bound
sec (877 mi) (111 mi)
03:34 UTC maneuver

30 August 4th lunar


Burn time: 1155 164 km 124 km [124]
2019 12:48 bound
sec (102 mi) (77 mi)
UTC maneuver

1
5th lunar
September 127 km 119 km [125]
bound Burn time: 52 sec
2019 12:51 (79 mi) (74 mi)
maneuver
UTC

Vikram lunar 2
landing September Vikram 127 km 119 km [126]

2019 7:45 separation (79 mi) (74 mi)
UTC

3
September 1st deorbit 128 km 104 km [164]
Burn time: 4 sec
2019 3:20 burn (80 mi) (65 mi)
UTC

3
September 2nd deorbit 101 km 35 km [165]
Burn time: 9 sec
2019 burn (63 mi) (22 mi)
22:12 UTC

6
September Powered Landing Landing
Burn time: 15 min
2019 descent (planned) (planned)
20:08 UTC

Trajectory
6 deviation started
Lost upon
September Vikram at 2.1 km altitude,
crash
2019 landing telemetry was lost
landing.
20:23 UTC seconds before
touchdown.[35][134]

7 Pragyan Lander failure, — — [166][167]


September rover rover was not
2019 deployment deployed.
00:00
UTC−01:00
UTC
(planned)

Aftermath
There was an outpouring of support for
ISRO from various quarters in the
aftermath of the crash landing of its lunar
lander. However, prominent Indian news
media also criticized ISRO's lack of
transparency regarding the crash of the
lander and its analysis of the
crash.[168][169] Indian media also noted
that unlike ISRO's previous record, the
report of the Failure Analysis Committee
was not made public.[41] ISRO's lack of
consistency regarding the explanation
around the rover's crashing was
criticized, with the organization providing
no proof of its own positions until the
efforts of NASA and a Chennai based
volunteer located the crash site on the
lunar surface.[170] In the wake of the
events surrounding Chandrayaan-2,
former ISRO employees criticized
unverified statements from the ISRO
chairman and what they claimed is the
top-down leadership and working
culture of the organization.[171][172][173]

Scientists involved in the


mission
A view of Mission Operations Complex (MOX-1),
ISTRAC[174] prior to the fourth Earth-bound
burn[163]

Key scientists and engineers involved in


the development of Chandrayaan-2
include:[175][176][177]

Ritu Karidhal – Mission Director


Muthayya Vanitha – Project Director
K. Kalpana – Associate Project
Director[178]
G. Narayanan – Associate Project
Director[179]
G. Nagesh – Project Director
(former)[180]
Chandrakanta Kumar – Deputy Project
Director (Radio-frequency systems)
Amitabh Singh – Deputy Project
Director (Optical Payload Data
Processing, SAC)[181]

Chandrayaan-3
In November 2019, ISRO officials stated
that a new lunar lander mission is being
studied for launch in Q2 2021;[182] this
new proposal is called Chandrayaan-3
and it would be a re-attempt to
demonstrate the landing capabilities
needed for the Lunar Polar Exploration
Mission proposed in partnership with
Japan for 2024.[183][184] If funded, this
re-attempt would not include launching
an orbiter.[185] The proposed
configuration would have a detachable
propulsion module, a lander and a
rover.[186][187][188][189] According to VSSC
director, S. Somanath, there will be more
follow-up missions in the Chandrayaan
programme.[149][190]
According to The Times of India, work on
Chandrayaan-3 commenced on 14
November 2019.[191] In December 2019,
it was reported that ISRO requested the
initial funding of the project, amounting
to ₹75 crore (US$11 million), of which
₹60 crore (US$8.4 million) is intended for
machinery, equipment and other capital
expenditure, while the remaining
₹15 crore (US$2.1 million) is sought
under revenue expenditure head.[192]
Confirming the existence of the project,
K. Sivan stated that its cost would be
around ₹615 crore (US$86 million).[193]

See also
Beresheet lander – Concurrent lunar
lander mission, crash-landed on the
Moon
Exploration of the Moon
List of missions to the Moon
List of ISRO missions
Lunar resources

References
1. "Chandrayaan-2 Latest Update" .
Indian Space Research
Organisation. 7 September 2019.
2. Nair, Avinash (31 May 2015). "ISRO
to deliver "eyes and ears" of
Chandrayaan-2 by 2015-end" . The
Indian Express. Retrieved 7 August
2016.
3. "Launch Kit of GSLV Mk III M1
Chandrayaan-2" (PDF). Indian
Space Research Organisation. 19
July 2019. Archived (PDF) from the
original on 19 July 2019. Retrieved
21 July 2019.
4. "Chandrayaan-2 to Be Launched in
January 2019, Says ISRO Chief" .
Gadgets360. NDTV. Press Trust of
India. 29 August 2018. Retrieved
29 August 2018.
5. "ISRO to send first Indian into Space
by 2022 as announced by PM, says
Dr Jitendra Singh" (Press release).
Department of Space. 28 August
2018. Retrieved 29 August 2018.
6. "Chandrayaan-2: All you need to
know about India's 2nd Moon
mission" . The Times of India. Times
News Network. 21 July 2019.
Archived from the original on 14
July 2019. Retrieved 22 July 2019.
7. "Chandrayaan-2 – Home" . Indian
Space Research Organisation.
Retrieved 20 June 2019.
8. "Launch kit at a glance" . Indian
Space Research Organisation.
9. "Chandrayan-2 Launch
Rescheduled on 22nd July, 2019,
AT 14:43 HRS" . Indian Space
Research Organisation. 18 July
2019. Retrieved 18 July 2019.
10. Singh, Surendra (5 August 2018).
"Chandrayaan-2 launch put off:
India, Israel in lunar race for 4th
position" . The Times of India. Times
News Network. Retrieved 15 August
2018.
11. Shenoy, Jaideep (28 February
2016). "ISRO chief signals India's
readiness for Chandrayaan II
mission" . The Times of India. Times
News Network. Retrieved 7 August
2016.
12. Ratcliffe, Rebecca (22 July 2019).
"India's Chandrayaan-2 moon
mission lifts off a week after
aborted launch" . The Guardian.
Guardian Media Group. Retrieved
23 July 2019.
13. "GSLV-Mk III – M1 / Chandrayaan-2
Mission" . Indian Space Research
Organisation. Retrieved 21 July
2019.
14. Kiran Kumar, Aluru Seelin (August
2015). Chandrayaan-2 – India's
Second Moon Mission .
YouTube.com. Inter-University
Centre for Astronomy and
Astrophysics. Retrieved 7 August
2016.
15. "ISRO aims for Chandrayaan-2
landing at 1.55 AM on September
07, says Dr K. Sivan" (Press
release). Delhi. Press Information
Bureau. Retrieved 24 August 2019.
16. d. s, Madhumathi (9 June 2019).
"ISRO gears up for Chandrayaan-2
mission" . The Hindu.
17. Chand, Manish (12 November
2007). "India, Russia to expand n-
cooperation, defer Kudankulam
deal" . Nerve. Archived from the
original on 13 January 2014.
Retrieved 12 January 2015.
18. Sunderarajan, P. (19 September
2008). "Cabinet clears
Chandrayaan-2" . The Hindu.
Retrieved 23 October 2008.
19. "ISRO completes Chandrayaan-2
design" . Domain-b.com. 17 August
2009. Retrieved 20 August 2009.
20. "India and Russia complete design
of new lunar probe" . Sputnik News.
RIA Novosti. 17 August 2009.
Retrieved 20 August 2009.
21. "Payloads for Chandrayaan-2
Mission Finalised" . Indian Space
Research Organisation (Press
release). 30 August 2010. Retrieved
4 January 2010.
22. Ramachandran, R. (22 January
2013). "Chandrayaan-2: India to go
it alone" . The Hindu.
23. Laxman, Srinivas (6 February 2012).
"India's Chandrayaan-2 Moon
Mission Likely Delayed After
Russian Probe Failure" . Asian
Scientist. Retrieved 5 April 2012.
24. "India's next moon mission depends
on Russia: ISRO chief" . NDTV.
Indo-Asian News Service. 9
September 2012.
25. "Chandrayaan-2" (Press release).
Department of Space. 14 August
2013. "Chandrayaan-2 would be a
lone mission by India without
Russian tie-up."
26. Clark, Stephen (15 August 2018).
"Launch Schedule" . Spaceflight
Now. Archived from the original on
16 August 2018.
27. "Chandrayaan-2 launch postponed
to October: ISRO chief" . The
Economic Times. Press Trust of
India. 23 March 2018. Retrieved
16 August 2018.
28. "ISRO to launch PSLVC-46 followed
by PSLVC-47, Chandrayaan-2 in
May: K. Sivan" . Asian News
International. 1 April 2019. Retrieved
1 April 2019.
29. "India's Moon Lander Damaged
During Test, Chandrayaan 2 Launch
Put on Hold" . The Wire. 4 April
2019. Retrieved 7 April 2019.
30. "Press release on Chandrayaan-2,
ISRO" . Indian Space Research
Organisation. Retrieved 1 May 2019.
31. "Chandrayaan 2 Moon Mission
Launch Aborted After Technical
Snag: 10 Points" . NDTV.com.
Retrieved 15 July 2019.
32. "Isro pinpoints GSLV-MkIII leak to
'nipple joint' of cryo engine" . The
Times of India. Times News
Network. 17 July 2019. Retrieved
23 July 2019.
33. "GSLV MkIII-M1 Successfully
Launches Chandrayaan-2
spacecraft" . Indian Space
Research Organisation. Retrieved
23 July 2019.
34. "Extra brake thrust may have sent
Vikram out of control in home
stretch" . The Times of India. Times
News Network. 8 September 2019.
35. Neel V. Patel (6 September 2019).
"India's Chandrayaan-2 lander likely
crashed into the moon's surface" .
MIT Technology Review. Retrieved
7 September 2019.
36. Chang, Kenneth (10 September
2019). "Did India's Chandrayaan-2
Moon Lander Survive? The Chances
Are Slim" . The New York Times.
37. India's Moon Mission Continues
Despite Apparent Lander Crash.
Mike Wall, Space. 7 September
2019. Quote: "India's Moon Mission
Continues Despite Apparent Lander
Crash."
38. "India's Vikram Spacecraft
Apparently Crash-Lands on Moon" .
www.planetary.org. Retrieved
7 September 2019.
39. "Vikram lander located on lunar
surface, wasn't a soft landing: Isro" .
The Times of India. Times News
Network. 8 September 2019.
40. How did Chandrayaan 2 fail? ISRO
finally has the answer. Mahesh
Guptan, The Week. 16 November
2019.
41. "Chandrayaan-2: Three months on,
ISRO yet to make public Vikram
lander failure report details" . The
Indian Express. 19 December 2019.
Retrieved 17 January 2020. "This is
unlike the ISRO’s previous record.
For instance, after the failure of an
operational fourth flight of the heavy
lift GSLV rocket — the GSLV-F02
mission — on July 10, 2006, a 15-
member FAC was tasked with
providing a report in a month. After
the report was submitted to the
government, ISRO made the details
public on September 6, 2006, on its
website. In 2010, when GSLV D3, a
developmental flight and the fifth
heavy lift GSLV rocket, failed after
launch on April 15, an FAC report
was submitted with the government
on May 24, 2010. Details of the
report were made public on July 9.
The same year, when GSLV F06, an
operational sixth flight for GSLV
rocket, failed on December 25,
ISRO went public on December 31,
with findings of an analysis of failure
done by a preliminary FAC
comprising space experts."
42. "Chandrayaan 2" . NSSDCA Master
Catalog. NASA. Retrieved 3 July
2019.
43. Rathinavel, T.; Singh, Jitendra (24
November 2016). "Question No.
1084: Deployment of Rover on
Lunar Surface" (PDF). Rajya Sabha.
44. Banerji, Abigail (13 July 2019).
"Chandrayaan 2: Everything you
need to know about the orbiter's
mission and design" . Tech2.
Retrieved 14 July 2019.
45. Monier Monier-Williams, A Sanskrit-
English Dictionary (1899): candra: "
[...] m. the moon (also personified
as a deity Mn. &c)" yāna: "[...] n. a
vehicle of any kind , carriage ,
waggon , vessel , ship , [...]"
46. "Chandrayaan-2 FAQ" . Retrieved
24 August 2019. "The name
Chandrayaan means "Chandra-
Moon, Yaan-vehicle", –in Indian
languages (Sanskrit and Hindi), –
the lunar spacecraft."
47. Kumar, Chethan (12 August 2018).
"Isro wants Chandrayaan-2 lander
to orbit moon first" . The Times of
India. Times News Network.
Retrieved 15 August 2018.
48. Ramesh, Sandhya (12 June 2019).
"Why Chandrayaan-2 is ISRO's
'most complex mission' so far" .
ThePrint. Retrieved 12 June 2019.
49. Singh, Surendra (20 February
2018). "Chandrayaan-2 mission
cheaper than Hollywood film
Interstellar" . The Times of India.
Times News Network. Retrieved
3 March 2018.
50. "Department of Space presentation
on 18 Jan 2019" (PDF). Department
of Space. 18 January 2019.
Retrieved 30 January 2019.
51. "Annual Report 2014–2015" (PDF).
Indian Space Research
Organisation. December 2014.
p. 82.
52. "Chandrayaan-2 to get closer to
moon" . The Economic Times.
Times News Network. 2 September
2010. Archived from the original on
12 August 2011.
53. "Annual Report 2015-2016" (PDF).
Indian Space Research
Organisation. December 2015.
p. 89. Archived from the original
(PDF) on 5 July 2016.
54. "HAL Delivers the Orbiter Craft
Module Structure of Chandrayaan-2
to ISRO" . Hindustan Aeronautics
Limited. 22 June 2015. Archived
from the original on 2 September
2018.
55. Singh, Surendra (7 September
2019). "Orbiter will have a lifespan
of 7.5 years, it's possible to find
Vikram Lander from orbiter: Isro
chief" . The Times of India. Times
News Network. Retrieved
7 September 2019.
56. "First set of beautiful images of the
Earth captured by Chandrayaan-2
Vikram Lander" . Archived from the
original on 6 August 2019.
Retrieved 25 August 2019.
57. Wilson, Horace Hayman (1832). A
dictionary in Sanscrit and English .
Calcutta: Education Press. p. 760.
58. Kumar, Chethan (12 August 2018).
"Chandrayaan-2 Lander to be
named 'Vikram' after Sarabhai" .
The Times of India. Times News
Network. Retrieved 15 August 2018.
59. "ISRO developing vehicle to launch
small satellites" . Frontline.
Retrieved 29 August 2018. "Making
a throttleable engine of 3
kilonewtons or 4 kilonewtons is a
totally new development for us. But
we wanted to make use of available
technologies. We have a LAM
[liquid apogee motor] with a 400
newton thruster, and we have been
using it on our satellites. We
enhanced it to 800 newtons. It was
not a major, new design change."
60. Mondal, Chinmoy; Chakrabarti,
Subrata; Venkittaraman, D.;
Manimaran, A. (2015).
Development of a Proportional Flow
Control Valve for the 800N Engine
Test . 9th National Symposium and
Exhibition on Aerospace and
Related Mechanisms. January
2015. Bengaluru, India.
ResearchGate.
61. "Chandrayaan-2 : The second
Indian mission to the Moon" (PDF).
hou.usra.edu. 1 February 2020.
Retrieved 1 February 2020.
62. "Chandrayaan-2: First step towards
Indians setting foot on moon in near
future" . The New Indian Express.
Retrieved 8 July 2019. "As solar
energy powers the system, a place
with good visibility and area of
communication was needed. Also,
the place where the landing takes
place should not have many
boulders and craters. The slope for
landing should be less than 12
degrees. The South pole has a
near-flat surface, with good visibility
and sunlight available from the
convenience point of view,"
63. Subramanian, T. S. "Chandrayaan 2:
Giant leap for ISRO" . Frontline.
Retrieved 9 July 2019.
64. "How ISRO Plans To Pull Off An
Unprecedented Landing on Moon's
South Pole" . NDTV.com. Retrieved
5 September 2019.
65. "Space Applications Centre, Annual
Report 2016–17" (PDF).
SAC.gov.in. p. 35. Archived (PDF)
from the original on 2 January 2018.
Retrieved 20 July 2019.
66. "Key payload for Chandrayaan-2
leaves for Bengaluru" . The Times of
India. Times News Network.
Retrieved 20 July 2019.
67. "SAC Seminar 2016" (PDF).
SAC.gov.in (in Hindi). 21 July 2017.
p. 94. Archived (PDF) from the
original on 5 September 2019.
Retrieved 5 September 2019.
68. "Department of Space Annual
Report 2016–17" (PDF). Indian
Space Research Organisation.
Archived (PDF) from the original on
18 March 2017. Retrieved 20 July
2019.
69. D. S., Madhumathi (25 October
2016). "ISRO starts landing tests for
Chandrayaan-2 mission" . The
Hindu. Retrieved 28 October 2016.
70. "ISRO begins flight integration
activity for Chandrayaan-2, as
scientists tests lander and rover" .
The Indian Express. Press Trust of
India. 25 October 2017. Retrieved
21 December 2017.
71. "Chandrayaan-2 Spacecraft" .
Indian Space Research
Organisation. Retrieved 24 August
2019. "Chandrayaan 2's Rover is a
6-wheeled robotic vehicle named
Pragyan, which translates to
'wisdom' in Sanskrit."
72. Wilson, Horace Hayman (1832). A
dictionary in Sanscrit and English .
Calcutta: Education Press. p. 561.
73. Elumalai, V.; Kharge, Mallikarjun (7
February 2019). "Chandrayaan – II"
(PDF). PIB.nic.in. Archived from the
original (PDF) on 7 February 2019.
Retrieved 7 February 2019. "Lander
(Vikram) is undergoing final
integration tests. Rover (Pragyan)
has completed all tests and waiting
for the Vikram readiness to undergo
further tests."
74. "ISRO to Launch Chandrayaan 2 on
July 15, Moon Landing by
September 7" . The Wire. Retrieved
12 June 2019.
75. Singh, Surendra; 2019; Ist, 14:02.
"Chandrayaan-2 will carry 14
payloads to moon, no foreign
module this time" . The Times of
India. TNN. Retrieved 11 May 2019.
76. Subhalakshmi, K.; Basavaraj, B.;
Selvaraj, P.; Laha, J. (22 December
2010). "Design of Miniature Space
Grade Navigation Camera for Lunar
Mission". 2010 International
Symposium on Electronic System
Design: 169–174.
doi:10.1109/ISED.2010.40 .
ISBN 978-1-4244-8979-4.
77. "With robot hands, IIT-K profs bring
joy to paralytics" . The Times of
India. Times News Network. 2019.
Retrieved 10 July 2019.
78. Annadurai, Mylswami; Nagesh, G.;
Vanitha, Muthayaa (28 June 2017).
" "Chandrayaan-2: Lunar Orbiter &
Lander Mission", 10th IAA
Symposium on The Future of Space
Exploration: Towards the Moon
Village and Beyond, Torin, Italy" .
International Academy of
Astronautics. Archived from the
original on 30 August 2017.
Retrieved 14 June 2019. "Mobility of
the Rover in the unknown lunar
terrain is accomplished by a Rocker
bogie suspension system driven by
six wheels. Brushless DC motors are
used to drive the wheels to move
along the desired path and steering
is accomplished by differential
speed of the wheels. The wheels
are designed after extensive
modelling of the wheel-soil
interaction, considering the lunar
soil properties, sinkage and
slippage results from a single wheel
test bed. The Rover mobility has
been tested in the Lunar test facility
wherein the soil simulant, terrain
and the gravity of moon are
simulated. The limitations w.r.t
slope, obstacles, pits in view of
slippage/sinkage have been
experimentally verified with the
analysis results."
79. "Dr M Annadurai, Project director,
Chandrayaan 1: 'Chandrayaan 2
logical extension of what we did in
first mission' " . The Indian Express.
29 June 2019. Retrieved 30 June
2019.
80. Payyappilly, Baiju; Muthusamy,
Sankaran (17 January 2018).
"Design framework of a
configurable electrical power
system for lunar rover" .
ResearchGate: 1–6.
doi:10.1109/ICPCES.2017.8117660 .
ISBN 978-1-5090-4426-9.
81. "Ashoka Chakra, ISRO Logo, Flag:
Chandrayaan 2 Set to Engrave
India's Name on Moon for
Centuries" . News18. Retrieved
4 September 2019.
82. Curtain Raiser video (Hindi) . Indian
Space Research Organisation (in
Hindi). Event occurs at 1 minute 55
seconds.
83. Bagla, Pallava (31 January 2018).
"India plans tricky and
unprecedented landing near
moon's south pole" . Science.
Retrieved 8 March 2018.
84. "Chandrayaan-2 Payloads" . Indian
Space Research Organisation. 12
June 2019. Archived from the
original on 13 July 2019. Retrieved
13 July 2019.
85. Beary, Habib (4 February 2010).
"NASA and ESA to partner for
Chandrayaan-2" . Sakal Times.
Retrieved 22 February 2010.
86. Laxman, Srinivas (5 September
2010). " 'We're launching
Chandrayaan-2 for a total coverage
of the moon' " . The Times of India.
Times News Network.
87. Bartels, Meghan (24 March 2019).
"How NASA Scrambled to Add
Science Experiments to Israeli,
Indian Moon Probes" . Space.com.
Retrieved 25 March 2019.
88. Science, Chelsea Gohd 2019-07-
26T16:42:31Z; Astronomy. "50
Years After Apollo, India Is Carrying
a NASA Laser Reflector to the Moon
(And It's Only the Start)" .
Space.com. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
89. "Implementing arrangement
between India and United States of
America for cooperation on the
Chandrayaan mission-2" (PDF).
Ministry of External Affairs. 11
February 2019. Archived (PDF)
from the original on 30 July 2019.
Retrieved 30 July 2019.
90. "Chandrayaan-2 Large Area Soft X-
ray Spectrometer" (PDF). Current
Science. 24 January 2020.
Retrieved 24 January 2020.
91. "Solar X-ray Monitor onboard
Chandrayaan-2 Orbiter" (PDF).
Current Science. 10 January 2020.
Retrieved 14 January 2020.
92. "L- and S-band Polarimetric
Synthetic Aperture Radar on
Chandrayaan-2 mission" (PDF).
Current Science. 24 January 2020.
Retrieved 24 January 2020.
93. "Imaging Infrared Spectrometer
onboard Chandrayaan-2 Orbiter"
(PDF). Current Science. 10 February
2020.
94. "Lynred IR detector onboard
Chandrayaan-2 expedition to
Moon's South Pole" (PDF). Lynred.
Archived (PDF) from the original on
26 September 2019.
95. "CHANDRAYAAN-2 spectrometer
for IIRS" . AMOS. 15 November
2018. Retrieved 26 September
2019.
96. "CHandra's Atmospheric
Composition Explorer-2 onboard
Chandrayaan-2 to study the lunar
neutral exosphere" (PDF). Current
Science. 24 January 2020.
Retrieved 24 January 2020.
97. "Terrain Mapping Camera-2
onboard Chandrayaan-2 Orbiter"
(PDF). Current Science. 25 February
2020. Retrieved 22 February 2020.
98. "Dual Frequency Radio Science
experiment onboard Chandrayaan-
2: a radio occultation technique to
study temporal and spatial
variations in the surface-bound
ionosphere of the Moon" (PDF).
Current Science. 24 January 2020.
Retrieved 24 January 2020.
99. "Orbiter High Resolution Camera
onboard Chandrayaan-2 Orbiter"
(PDF). Current Science. 25 February
2020. Retrieved 22 February 2020.
100. Clark, Stephen. "NASA lunar orbiter
to image Chandrayaan 2 landing
site" . Spaceflight Now. Retrieved
12 September 2019.
101. "Chandrayaan-2 latest update" .
Indian Space Research
Organisation. Retrieved
7 September 2019.
102. "Instrument for Lunar Seismic
Activity Studies on Chandrayaan-2
Lander" (PDF). Current Science. 10
February 2020.
103. Mallikarjun, Y. (29 May 2013). "India
plans to send seismometer to study
moonquakes" . The Hindu.
Retrieved 1 June 2013.
104. "Lunar near surface plasma
environment from Chandrayaan-2
Lander platform: RAMBHA-LP
payload" (PDF). Current Science.
10 February 2020.
105. India Heads to the Moon With
Chandrayaan 2 . David Dickinson,
Sky & Telescope. 22 July 2019.
Quote: "Vikram carries a
seismometer, thermal probe, and
an instrument to measure variation
and density of lunar surface plasma,
along with a laser retro-reflector
supplied by NASA's Goddard
Spaceflight Center."
106. "Laser Induced Breakdown
Spectroscope on Chandrayaan-2
Rover: a miniaturized mid-UV to
visible active spectrometer for lunar
surface chemistry studies" (PDF).
Current Science. 25 February 2020.
Retrieved 22 February 2020.
107. "Alpha Particle X-ray Spectrometer
onboard Chandrayaan-2 Rover"
(PDF). Current Science. 10 January
2020. Retrieved 14 January 2020.
108. "India chooses Russian Cm-244
sources for flights to the Moon" .
www.isotop.ru. Retrieved
26 September 2019.
109. "PRL News – The Spectrum,
September 2019" (PDF). prl.res.in.
Archived (PDF) from the original on
26 September 2019.
110. Subramanian, T. S. "What went
wrong with the Chandrayaan-2
launch" . Frontline. Retrieved
24 July 2019.
111. Chandran, Cynthia (23 July 2019).
"For VSSC chief, setbacks are part
of victory cruise" . Deccan
Chronicle. Retrieved 24 July 2019.
112. Kumar, Chethan (23 July 2019).
"Chandrayaan-2 will only have 4
operations around Earth" . The
Times of India. Times News
Network. Retrieved 24 July 2019.
113. "Live coverage: India's
Chandrayaan 2 moon mission
blasts off" . SpaceFlight Now.
Retrieved 24 July 2019.
114. Kumar, Chethan (29 July 2019).
"Chandrayaan-2 healthy after
another manoeuvre" . The Times of
India. Times News Network.
Retrieved 29 July 2019.
115. Hartley, Anna (23 July 2019).
"Strange object in the night sky was
probably a rocket heading to the
Moon: astronomer" . ABC News.
Retrieved 27 July 2019.
116. Acharya, Mosiqi (24 July 2019).
"Was the mysterious bright spot in
Australian skies Chandrayaan-2,
India's mission to Moon?" . SBS
Hindi. Retrieved 7 September 2019.
117. "Chandrayaan2 update: Fifth earth
bound maneuver" . Indian Space
Research Organisation. Retrieved
6 August 2019.
118. "Chandrayaan-2 Successfully
enters Lunar Transfer Trajectory" .
Indian Space Research
Organisation. Retrieved 14 August
2019.
119. "Here's Why Chandrayaan-2 Will
Take 48 Days to Reach the Moon" .
The Quint. 9 August 2019. Archived
from the original on 25 August
2019. Retrieved 25 August 2019.
120. Kottasová, Ivana; Gupta, Swati (20
August 2019). "India's
Chandrayaan-2 moon mission
enters lunar orbit" . CNN. Retrieved
6 September 2019.
121. "Chandrayaan-2 update: Lunar
Orbit Insertion" . Indian Space
Research Organisation. Retrieved
20 August 2019.
122. "Chandrayaan-2 update: Second
Lunar Orbit Maneuver" . Indian
Space Research Organisation.
Retrieved 21 August 2019.
123. "Chandrayaan-2 update: Third
Lunar bound Orbit Maneuver" .
Indian Space Research
Organisation. Retrieved 28 August
2019.
124. "Chandrayaan-2 update: Fourth
Lunar Orbit Maneuver" . Indian
Space Research Organisation.
Archived from the original on 30
August 2019. Retrieved 30 August
2019.
125. "Chandrayaan-2 update: Fifth Lunar
Orbit Maneuver" . Indian Space
Research Organisation. Retrieved
1 September 2019.
126. "Chandrayaan-2 update: Vikram
Lander successfully separates from
Orbiter" . Indian Space Research
Organisation. Retrieved
2 September 2019.
127. Amitabh, S.; Srinivasan, T. P.;
Suresh, K. (2018). Potential Landing
Sites for Chandrayaan-2 Lander in
Southern Hemisphere of Moon
(PDF). 49th Lunar and Planetary
Science Conference. 19–23 March
2018. The Woodlands, Texas.
Bibcode:2018LPI....49.1975A .
Archived from the original (PDF) on
22 August 2018.
128. Obscured in the Lunar Highlands?
Karl Hille, NASA. LRO Mission. 26
September 2019.
129. Srishti Choudhary (14 July 2019).
"Chandrayaan-2: How 'Lander
Vikram' will touchdown on the
moon?" . Live Mint.
130. Geological Insights into
Chandrayaan-2 Landing Site in the
Southern High Latitudes of the
Moon. Rishitosh K. Sinha, Vijayan
Sivaprahasam, Megha Bhatt, Harish
Nandal, Nandita Kumari, Neeraj
Srivastava, Indhu Varatharajan,
Dwijesh Ray, Christian Wöhler, and
Anil Bhardwaj. 50th Lunar and
Planetary Science Conference 2019
(LPI Contrib. No. 2132).
131. Chandrayaan 2: Here's everything
about ISRO Moon-landing its
Vikram lander. Financial Express.
Ribu Mishra, 7 September 2019.
132. India Just Found Its Lost Vikram
Lander on the Moon, Still No
Signal. Tariq Malik ,Space.com. 8
September 2019.
133. India has Located the Vikram
Lander, But it's Still not
Communicating With Home. Matt
Williams, Universe Today. 11
September 2019.
134. Frozen screens tell story:
Chandrayaan-2’s Vikram Lander fell
silent 335 m from Moon. Johnson
T. A., Indian Express. 11 September
2019.
135. The speed at which it was travelling
didn't give moon lander a chance:
Expert. India Economic Times. 21
September 2019.
136. "Lander Vikram located: K Sivan" .
www.aninews.in. Retrieved
8 September 2019.
137. Schultz, Kai (8 September 2019).
"India Says It Has Located
Chandrayaan-2 Lander on Moon's
Surface" . The New York Times.
Retrieved 8 September 2019.
138. Chang, Kenneth (10 September
2019). "Did India's Chandrayaan-2
Moon Lander Survive? The Chances
Are Slim" . The New York Times.
ISSN 0362-4331 . Retrieved
11 September 2019.
139. Spaceflight, Meghan Bartels 2019-
09-13T21:53:57Z. "US Moon
Landing Hopefuls Watch Silent India
Lander – and Learn" . Space.com.
Retrieved 14 September 2019.
140. Hard landing derailed lunar mission,
says K Sivan. Raghu Krishnan, The
Economic Times, 9 September
2019.
141. Chandrayaan 2: The Sun has finally
set on Vikram lander. Swathi
Moorthy, Money Control. 22
September 2019.
142. NASA lunar orbiter to image
Chandrayaan 2 landing site next
week. Stephen Clark, Spaceflight
Now. 12 September 2019.
143. Search for Vikram Lander: NASA
Analysing Images Taken by Lunar
Reconnaissance Orbiter. Indo-
Asian News Service. 19 September
2019.
144. NASA Moon Orbiter Fails to Spot
India's Lunar Lander: Report.
Leonard David, Space.com. 18
September 2019.
145. Spaceflight, Meghan Bartels 2019-
10-24T16:47:51Z. "A NASA
Spacecraft Still Hasn't Spotted
India's Ill-Fated Moon Lander" .
Space.com. Retrieved 25 October
2019.
146. NASA still searching for India's
Chandrayaan-2 Vikram moon
lander. Amanda Kooser, CNET. 18
September 2019.
147. Chandrayaan-2: NASA to Perform a
'Rigorous' Search for Vikram
Lander. Indo-Asian News Service.
18 October 2019.
148. NASA finds no trace of India's
Chandrayaan-2 Vikram lander in
latest pics by Moon orbiter. The
Economic Times. 24 October 2019.
149. Episode 90 – An update on ISRO’s
activities with S Somanath and R
Umamaheshwaran . Event occurs
at 30 minute 46 seconds.
150. "Unstarred Question number: 588" .
164.100.47.194. Archived from the
original on 20 November 2019.
Retrieved 20 November 2019. "The
first phase of descent was
performed nominally from an
altitude of 30 km to 7.4 km above
the moon surface. The velocity was
reduced from 1683 m/s to 146 m/s.
During the second phase of
descent, the reduction in velocity
was more than the designed value.
Due to this deviation, the initial
conditions at the start of the fine
braking phase were beyond the
designed parameters. As a result,
Vikram hard-landed within 500 m of
the designated landing site."
151. Kumar, Chethan (20 November
2019). "Chandrayaan-2: Extra
braking caused Vikram to deviate:
Govt in LS" . The Times of India.
Times News Network.
152. "New details emerge about failed
lunar landings" . SpaceNews.com.
21 November 2019. Retrieved
21 November 2019.
153. India Admits Its Moon Lander
Crashed, Cites Problem with
Braking Thrusters. Chelsea Gohd,
Space.com 25 November 2019.
154. Chang, Kenneth (2 December
2019). "NASA Finds India's Vikram
Moon Lander Crash Site, With
Amateur's Help" . The New York
Times. ISSN 0362-4331 . Retrieved
3 December 2019.
155. "India's crashed Vikram moon
lander spotted on lunar surface" .
The Guardian. Guardian Media
Group. Agence France-Presse. 3
December 2019. Retrieved
17 December 2019.
156. "Vikram Lander Found | Lunar
Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera" .
lroc.sese.asu.edu. Retrieved
2 December 2019.
157. Chang, Kenneth (6 December
2019). "A Billion Pixels and the
Search for India's Crashed Moon
Lander" . The New York Times.
ISSN 0362-4331 . Retrieved
7 December 2019.
158. "Chandrayaan-2 update:Mission
Plan of Chandrayaan-2
spacecraft" . Indian Space
Research Organisation. Retrieved
24 July 2019.
159. "Live media coverage of the landing
of Chandrayaan-2 on lunar
surface" . Indian Space Research
Organisation. Retrieved
2 September 2019.
160. "Chandrayaan2 update: First earth
bound maneuver" . Indian Space
Research Organisation. Retrieved
24 July 2019.
161. "Chandrayaan2 update: Second
earth bound maneuver" . Indian
Space Research Organisation. 26
July 2019. Archived from the
original on 25 July 2019. Retrieved
26 July 2019.
162. "Chandrayaan2 update: Third earth
bound maneuver" . Indian Space
Research Organisation. Retrieved
29 July 2019.
163. "Chandrayaan2 update: Fourth
earth bound maneuver" . Indian
Space Research Organisation.
Retrieved 2 August 2019.
164. "Chandrayaan-2 update: First de-
orbiting maneuver" . Indian Space
Research Organisation. Retrieved
3 September 2019.
165. "Chandrayaan-2 update: Second
de-orbiting maneuver" . Indian
Space Research Organisation.
Retrieved 3 September 2019.
166. News, All India Radio (6 September
2019). "#Chandrayaan2 ; Vikram &
Pragyan Timeline :
#Chandrayaan2Live
#Chandrayaan2Landingpic.twitter.c
om/nZ2u18OXjb" . @airnewsalerts
(in Hungarian). Archived from the
original on 11 September 2019.
Retrieved 11 September 2019.
167. "Chandrayaan 2 Landing highlights:
PM Narendra Modi says India
stands in solidarity with ISRO
scientists- Technology News,
Firstpost" . Tech2. 6 September
2019. Retrieved 11 September
2019.
168. "ISRO silent on NASA pictures of
Vikram" . The Hindu. 3 December
2019. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
"However, except for sketchy
information, ISRO has shied away
from sharing its own analysis of the
crash."
169. "ISRO finally admits to Chandrayaan
2's lander Vikram lying on Moon 'in
pieces' " . The New Indian Express.
1 January 2020. Retrieved 29 May
2020. "On being persistently asked
by the media on Wednesday why
ISRO was not being transparent
about the fate of the lander as the
entire nation was waiting with bated
breath for a successful landing,
Sivan finally said, "Yes, yes...it is in
pieces...!""
170. "ISRO: Time for Change of
leadership" . Newsroom24x7. 18
December 2019. Retrieved 28 May
2020. "Question that remains to be
answered by ISRO is where ‘s the
proof for what they have been
claiming. Why no photographs or a
video of the Lander’s undocking
from the Lunar Orbiter have been
made public till now. Only an
objective probe will find answers to
the questions regarding
Chandrayaan-2 and what led to the
Lander’s failure. There are also
many lapses that should make the
citizens of India, who fund ISRO’s
working, sit up straight"
171. "Chandrayaan-2: Was India's Moon
mission actually a success?" . BBC
News. 30 September 2019.
Retrieved 28 May 2020. "Mr Sivan's
remarks have been met with
criticism from scientists who said it
was too early for Isro to term the
mission a success, especially since
its most important goal - to land a
rover on the Moon's surface that
can gather crucial data - remains
unrealised."
172. "Senior ISRO Scientist Criticises
Sivan's Approach After Moon
Mission Setback" . The Wire. 22
September 2019. Retrieved 28 May
2020. "Misra called attention to
ISRO’s top-down working culture
and inadequate leadership,
particularly in the face of
Chandrayaan 2 having failed to
execute its surface mission because
the lander crashed on the Moon’s
surface instead of touching down."
173. "No ISRO update on Chandrayaan-
2 lander but social media goes wild
with speculation" . The Print. 10
September 2019. Retrieved 29 May
2020. "The chairman also released
a statement Friday, saying 90 to
95% of mission objectives have
already been met. The statement
was met with much criticism due to
a lack of transparency on the
calculation of these percentages."
174. "At Bangalore mission control,all
eyes on Mars" . The Indian Express.
16 December 2013. Retrieved
2 August 2019.
175. The women, and men, behind
Chandrayaan 2. Madhumathi D.S.,
The Hindu. 15 July 2019.
176. Chandrayaan-2: India launches
second Moon mission. BBC News.
22 July 2019.
177. "Chandrayaan-2 deputy project
director taught village students to
fund his education" . The Times of
India. 30 July 2019. Retrieved
23 August 2019.
178. "BENGALURU, KARNATAKA, INDIA.
Ms K Kalpana, an electrical
engineer at..." Getty Images.
Retrieved 11 September 2019.
179. Rajwi, Tiki (14 July 2019). "The
Malayali hand in Chandrayaan-2" .
The Hindu. Special Correspondent.
ISSN 0971-751X . Retrieved
11 September 2019.
180. SUBRAMANIAN, T. S. "Cryogenic
gains for GSLV" . Frontline.
Retrieved 11 September 2019.
181. "Amitabh Singh | MTech | Indian
Space Research Organization,
Bengaluru | ISRO | signal & Image
Processing | ResearchGate" .
ResearchGate. Retrieved 26 August
2019.
182. "A mix of young and middle-aged
people will train for Gaganyaan" .
The Week. Retrieved 28 January
2020. "The work on Chandrayaan-3
is also going on; it should be
launched in the next 16 months or
so."
183. "Unstarred Question no. 1384 in Lok
Sabha" . 164.100.47.194. Archived
from the original on 27 November
2019. Retrieved 27 November 2019.
184. "ISRO Will Embark on Chandrayaan
3 by November 2020 for Another
Landing Attempt" . The Wire. 14
November 2019. Retrieved 13 May
2020.
185. "2nd Lunar landing effort by ISRO" .
14 November 2019.
186. Kumar, Chethan (14 November
2019). "Chandrayaan-3: Second bid
to land on Moon by November
2020" . The Times of India.
Retrieved 15 November 2019.
187. "After failure of 'Vikram' lander,
India may again attempt soft
landing on Moon next November" .
The New Indian Express. Retrieved
15 November 2019.
188. "ISRO Will Embark on Chandrayaan
3 by November 2020 for Another
Landing Attempt" . The Wire.
Retrieved 15 November 2019.
189. "ISRO Will Attempt Another Soft-
Landing on the Moon 'in the Near
Future' " . The Wire. Retrieved
15 November 2019.
190. "CHANDRAYAAN-III" (Press
release). Delhi. Press Information
Bureau. 27 November 2019.
Retrieved 1 December 2019.
191. "Chandrayaan-2 director out of 3rd
Moon mission" . The Times of India.
Times News Network. 18 December
2019. Retrieved 26 December 2019.
192. Kumar, Chethan (8 December
2019). "Isro seeks 75 crore more
from Centre for Chandrayaan-3" .
The Times of India. Times News
Network. Retrieved 8 December
2019.
193. "Chandrayaan-3 to cost Rs 615
crore, launch could stretch to
2021" . The Times of India. Times
News Network. 2 January 2020.
Retrieved 2 January 2020.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media


related to Chandrayaan_2.

Official Chandrayaan-2 mission page ,


by the Indian Space Research
Organisation
GSLV-Mk III launcher , by the Indian
Space Research Organisation
Retrieved from
"https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?
title=Chandrayaan-2&oldid=969754673"

Last edited 12 days ago by Ohsin

Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless


otherwise noted.

You might also like