Cen Joint Report

CEN/BT WG 207 Joint Report 2011-08-08
Date Reference
2011-08-08 CEN/BT/WG 207 N 29
CEN/BT/WG 207
Requested action
Title
"Accessibility in built environment" For information only
Secretariat AENOR For discussion

Responsible Ms Tania MARCOS For comments (Deadline:2011-10-09)
e-mail: accessibility@aenor.es
Assistant Ms Sara CANO For voting (Deadline: )
Tel: +34 91 432 60 56
Other action:
Fax: +34 91 310 45 96
e-mail: accessibility@aenor.es
Draft Joint Report - CEN/BT WG 207 (PT A and PT B)

Phase I: Inventory, analysis and feasibility of European and International
accessibility standards in the built environment
o Team A: Inventory and feasibility of existing European and
International standards, building codes, technical regulations and
guidance documents for accessibility in the built environment
o Team B: Analysis of European and International accessibility

requirements and assessment of existing testing and conformity
schemes
Please send feedback to PTA leader, Ms Monika Klenovec (teama_m420@yahoo.com)

Please send feedback to PT B leader, Ms. Isabela Nita (teamb_m420@yahoo.com)
-1-
CONTENT
1 Executive Summary............................................................................................................. 4
2 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 6
2.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 6
2.2 Universal Design and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities .............. 6
2.3 Key Element: Accessibility of the built environment in Standards ......................................... 7
3 Team A – Production of an inventory, comparing the existing European and International
standards, building codes, technical regulations and guidance documents for accessibility
in the built environment ..................................................................................................... 7
3.1 Approach and methodology ................................................................................................ 7
3.1.1 Steps for developing this report ........................................................................................ 9
3.1.2 Context of the use and user roles (common chapter) ....................................................... 11
3.2 Inventory .......................................................................................................................... 12
3.2.1 European Standardization Mandates for Accessibility in the built environment................ 12
3.2.2 Legislation supported by Accessibility Standardization in Europe: Functional and
Technical Requirements in CEN standards ....................................................................... 12
3.2.3 ISO Standardisation relevant for accessibility of the built environment ............................ 15
3.2.4 Comparison of ISO/FDIS 21542 with some leading non-EU standards ............................... 15
3.3 Analysis of gaps ................................................................................................................ 22
3.3.1 Inventory of national and international legal requirements and advisory measures
for ensuring accessibility of the built environment ........................................................... 22
3.3.2 Inventory of national legal requirements in the built environment in European MS ......... 24
3.3.3 Inventory of user need coverage on accessibility requirements of the built environment . 27
3.3.4 Inventory of national country reports of existing legislation / standards / guides on
accessibility requirements of the built environment ........................................................ 28
3.3.5 Inventory of updated summary of CEBC “access for all” report ........................................ 31
3.3.6 Analysis of Gaps (Overview)............................................................................................ 37
3.4 Conclusions View, Findings and Recommendations............................................................ 41
3.4.1 Overview........................................................................................................................ 41
3.4.2 Findings ......................................................................................................................... 42
3.4.3 Recommendations.......................................................................................................... 44
3.4.4 Proposal and recommendations concerning Mandate 420 – Accessibility Statement ........ 44
3.5 Proposal for a standardization work programme ............................................................... 48
3.5.1 Functional requirements as the basis for planning and design of the built environment ... 48
3.5.2 Proposal for an EN standard/Technical Specification describing all technical details
based on the functional accessibility requirements ......................................................... 57
3.5.3 Proposed documents for phase II: References to the explicit details in ISO 21542
and other guidance documents ....................................................................................... 61
4 Team B – Analysis of existing conformity assessment schemes of the buildings and
products meeting accessibility requirements for the built environment ............................. 70
4.1 General consideration ....................................................................................................... 70
4.2 Conformity assessment fundamentals ............................................................................... 71
4.2.1 Standards about conformity assessment ......................................................................... 71
4.2.2 Conformity assessment overview.................................................................................... 73
-2-
4.2.3 Functional model of conformity assessment.................................................................... 74

4.3 Identification and analysis of the accessibility assessment schemes within building
control schemes for building, public spaces and shared areas ............................................ 79
4.3.1 European experience and practices – EU member states and EFTA................................... 79
4.3.2 The conformity assessment schemes in accessibility labels and awards............................ 91
4.3.3 International experience and practices – Australia, Canada and USA................................ 93
4.4 Identification and analysis of the accessibility assessment schemes for construction
products and other products used in built environment .................................................... 98
4.5 Identification and analysis of the accessibility assessment schemes for transport related
built facilities ................................................................................................................... 99
4.5.1 Freedom of movement ................................................................................................... 99
4.5.2 Conformity assessment requirements in case air transport .............................................. 99
4.5.3 Conformity assessment requirements in railway ............................................................100
4.6 Legal framework for public procurement as regards accessibility and conformity
assessment for built environment ....................................................................................105
4.6.1 General rules for all public procurements .......................................................................105
4.6.2 Accessibility in the Procurement Directives ....................................................................107
4.6.3 Conformity assessment in Procurement Directives .........................................................111
4.6.4 Specific legislation on procurements in the domain of the built environment ..................113
4.7 Conclusions and recommendations ..................................................................................117
4.7.1 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................117
4.7.2 Recommendations.........................................................................................................119
5 Bibliography ....................................................................................................................122
ANNEX A Objective of the Mandate ..........................................................................................170
ANNEX B History of the report ..................................................................................................172
ANNEX C Terminology and Definitions ......................................................................................174
ANNEX D European Framework ................................................................................................177
ANNEX E European Guides and Standards on accessibility .........................................................184
ANNEX F All documents in inventory .........................................................................................210
ANNEX G National Status reports of existing legislation, standards, guides on accessibility
requirements of the built environment .......................................................................226
ANNEX H Input data of team B report ........................................................................................301
ANNEX I CEBC Report updated data 2011 ..................................................................................414
ANNEX J Education and training of architects, public procurers, construction engineers etc. .......423
-3-
1 Executive Summary
Accessibility to the built environment is an essential and fundamental right for all members of
society. Providing accessible places and spaces empowers people to enjoy the everyday activities and
opportunities taking place or being offered there and enables them to participate safely,
conveniently, with confidence, with dignity and, wherever possible, independently. This is so for all
users but especially for people with disabilities.
Whilst such benefits are known there are many examples in the current built environment where
completed buildings or spaces do not offer an appropriate level of accessibility. The existing building
stock is where the vast majority of access barriers are found but new buildings and facilities continue
to be built where there is less than satisfactory access. Whilst this is true for both public and privately
funded projects, it is of particular concern for those that are funded through the public purse.
The lack of delivery of appropriate standards of accessibility has been blamed on a poor
understanding by designers of the needs of people when using buildings, inadequacies in the
education and knowledge of those designing, constructing or managing the built environment: There
may well be a fundamental flaw in the whole procurement, construction and delivery process, or
possibly a combination of them all.
This report addresses the effectiveness of national regulations and standards amongst EU member
States and internationally, and how their presence and enforcement assists or hinders the delivery of
accessibility.
Using data gathered from EU Members States, the recently completed ISO/FDIS 21542 and
international countries including the US, Canada, the study has identified that there is a substantial
amount of regulations, standards and guidance currently available to assist in the design and delivery
of an accessible built environment. Whilst gaps do exist, (and in some cases that is apparent across
several Member States), there are very few accessibility requirements and building elements that are
not appropriately covered by a regulation, standard or guidance somewhere in the EU or
internationally.
The study shows that the level and scope of guidance available on issues related to the needs of
people with learning difficulties and sensory impairments is much less than that available for people
with mobility impairments.
How compliance with regulations and standards is monitored and enforced is much more
inconsistent amongst EU Member States. This is, in part, due to the different legislative practices and
policies adopted amongst EU Member States, but it is also affected by differing cultural views and
expectations of the roles which regulations and standards play within the construction process of
individual Member States.
In general terms the frameworks for conformity assessment in EU Member States have been found
to be weak, with poor consideration for accessibility matters. While this study has not investigated
specific cases of public tendering and conformity assessment, it is clear that the system of
enforcement of legislation, regulation and guidance could be improved considerably in many
countries, so as to ensure better building control practices.
It should be noted that simply introducing more regulations, mandates or directives or providing
additional guidance documents without also addressing the widespread inadequate and ineffective
conformity assessment and enforcement processes currently in place is unlikely to improve the
current situation.
The report makes reference to studies that have identified a wide variation in the experience,
qualifications and professional expertise in accessibility and inclusion of those responsible for
ensuring compliance or conformity with regulations and standards across EU Member States. In most
cases training and levels of experience in such issues is inadequate and contributes to the lack of
accessibility of the finished project.
-4-
The study has found that there are many instances of good laws, standards and guidance covering
different aspects of accessibility in many countries, reflecting different practices and priorities. For
EU public procurement a common approach should draw on good examples and establish common
references and procedures, which all countries can refer to and follow. This will provide, for the first
time, a shared language and common tools for developing accessible built environments though
public procurement.
The study concludes that to combat the weaknesses regarding accessibility in building legislation,
guidance and conformity systems in Europe, a common EU-level approach should be introduced,
including:
1. An EU reference document (EN standard) for basic functional requirements for accessibility of
the built environment,
2. An EU reference document (EN standard) of minimum technical specifications, related to the
functional requirements,
3. An EU model for tendering and conformity assessment designed to address accessibility
throughout the public procurement process.
EU-wide basic requirements and specifications should be designed, taking into account current
existing guidance world-wide. EU legislation should also be considered to enforce the requirements
throughout all member states, for all public procurements and in the framework of Construction
Product Regulation.
Tools and procedures should be developed to assist public procurers on how to clearly identify legal
requirements for equality and inclusion, how they should be addressed in developing accessible,
inclusive built environments, who should be involved in the process and who is responsible for
ensuring delivery.
It is also necessary to consider the introduction of effective enforcement measures to deal with non-
compliance.
The study also recommends that consideration should be given to:
developing an EU wide scheme of accreditation of persons competent in accessibility; and
4. Improved training for students, design professionals.
It is important to note that the proposed EU-level documents and conformity assessment procedures
would not replace existing systems of legislation, guidance and control in the EU Member States, but
would serve as basic, minimum requirements and specifications. It must be decided by EU and
national lawmakers whether these should be enforced by EU legislation or possibly, with respect to
Community-funded projects, as a requirement in all cases where funding is granted for built
environment design and construction works.
-5-
2 Introduction
Additionally to this introduction more comprehensive background information is summarized in the
Annexes.
2.1 Background
Accessibility to the built environment and infrastructure is essential for people with disabilities to
participate fully in society and to be able to exercise their rights.
As full citizens, people with disabilities have equal rights and are entitled to dignity, equal treatment,
independent living and full participation in society. Enabling people with disabilities to enjoy these
rights is a fundamental long-term strategic aim of the EU.
Currently, many Europeans with disabilities are unable to participate in important areas of society
because the policies adopted and the design and management of the built environments they use
are not designed to meet their needs (Council of Europe, 2009). In addition, whilst not all elderly
people have disabilities, there is a higher prevalence for disability as people grow older. Therefore
with a rapidly growing number of elderly people within EU Member countries, there will be an
increasingly urgent need for societies to consider and accommodate the needs of people with
disabilities.
In 2010 the Commission adopted the European Disability Strategy 2010-2020 to break down the
barriers that prevent persons with disabilities from participating in society on an equal basis. The
strategy outlines how the EU and national governments can empower people with disabilities so that
they can fully enjoy their rights. Specific measures over the next decade include improving
accessibility to goods and services, health care, employment and education.
Under the 2010-2020 Strategy disability is clearly regarded as an issue of rights rather than one of
discretion. This approach is also at the core of the UN Convention on the Rights of People with
Disabilities, to which the European Community is a signatory.
2.2 Universal Design and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Within the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCPD), there are several clear
references to the importance of Universal Design and the requirement to fully consider the needs of
people with disabilities.
For example, in the Preamble of UNCPD the importance of mainstreaming disability issues as an
integral part of sustainable development strategiesis highlighted. This also applies to the importance
of accessibility to the physical, social, economic and cultural environment, health, education, access
to information and communication. This enables persons with disabilities to fully enjoy their human
rights and fundamental freedoms.
Article 2 of the UNCPD defines “Universal Design” as:
“the design of products, environments, programmes and services to be usable by all people, to
the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design. “Universal
design” shall not exclude assistive devices for particular groups of persons with disabilities
where this is needed.”
as “Universal Design” is also referred to in the ‘general obligations’ in Article 4 which identifies that:
“States Parties undertake to ensure and promote the full realization of all human rights and
fundamental freedoms for all persons with disabilities without discrimination of any kind on the
basis of disability. To this end, States Parties....:
(f) undertake or promote research and development of universally designed goods, services,
equipment and facilities, as defined in article 2 of the present Convention, which should require
the minimum possible adaptation and the least cost to meet the specific needs of a person with
-6-
disabilities, to promote their availability and use, and to promote universal design in the
development of standards and guidelines;”
UNCPD Article 9 “Accessibility” provides comprehensive guidance on how to enable persons with
disabilities to live independently and fully participate in all aspects of life. This includes the
identification and removal by State Parties of obstacles and barriers to accessibility in several areas
including the built environment, the provision of medical facilities and the provision and use of
electronic and emergency services. Article 9 also identifies the importance of promoting, monitoring,
training and maintaining accessibility to ensure ongoing suitability for people with disabilities.
UNCPD has been signed by all Member Countries and ratified by both the EU and 16 Member
Countries. It is a legally binding instrument intended for better implementation of Universal Design
and Accessibility within a sustainable environment.
Within the UNCPD the role for national governments is clearly described to pursue the development
of products, services and environments that are universally designed.
2.3 Key Element: Accessibility of the built environment in Standards
These 4 priorities – equal rights, equal treatment, independent living and full participation in society
– show a high level of awareness regarding accessibility of the built environment. For example one
of the main key issues of independent living and equal rights is to have access to, all public amenities.
Services, information and communication systems are also other important areas to be considered
for all users.
More than ten years after the publication of Mandate 2831, and eight years since the adoption of
CEN/CENELEC Guide 6, European standards should reflect the needs of older people and people with
disabilities2 but as the results of CEN 2006 questionnaire pointed out clearly less awareness and
activities in CEN/TCs can be seen to implement accessibility in their standards.
The missing legal approach on inclusion of “accessibility in use” in the former Construction Product
Directive within the Essential Requirement No. 4 “Safety in use” is another important fact. In future
the new “Construction Product Regulation”3 with ‘accessibility’ added in basic requirement No. 4 to
“Safety and Accessibility in use” will have an impact within CEN Standardization. More information
about recent development will be included after the Open Meeting in cooperation with EC DG ENTR.
3 Team A – Production of an inventory, comparing the existing European and

International standards, building codes, technical regulations and guidance documents
for accessibility in the built environment
3.1 Approach and methodology
The challenge for this comprehensive inventory was to create a data collection spreadsheet structure
that identified important elements of the built environment and to identify and assess the different
legislation, building regulations standards, guides and conformity assessment schemes that covered
these areas in various EU and non-EU countries
ISO/FDIS 21542 “Accessibility and usability of the built environment” was used as a benchmark
against which to identify the level of coverage in technical guidance in the various countries
considered.
1
M/283 Mandate to the European Standard Bodies for a guidance document in the field of safety and usability of
products by people with special needs (e.g. elderly and disabled)
2
Results of CEN 2006 Questionnaire on the use of Guide 6, CEN BT N7671
3
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:088:0005:0043:EN:PDF
-7-
CEN/CENELEC Guide 6 “Guidelines for standards developers to address the needs of older persons and
persons with disabilities” is the appropriate benchmark for products and services including factors to
be considered with functional requirements.
The process adopted has also enabled the identification of gaps in the guidance available and the
usefulness of regulations, standards and guidance in the public procurement process. The
spreadsheet indicates also if the respective legislation, regulation, standard, guide has functional or
technical requirements included.
In the spreadsheet, the first columns include assessments of the general coverage of information in
documents such as ISO, CEN or other standards and guidance documents.
The country-specific data columns provide information on the national coverage (and gaps) of
building elements and/or user requirements either on the state or on the country’s level. Several
European Member States have federal constitutions where the country/province/canton is
responsible for building regulations. In some fields as in public procurement and equal treatment of
employees the state is the responsible authority.
The data collection spreadsheet consists of different sheets:
1. Instructions with explanation about the content of the data collection
2. Inventory for ISO/CEN and other standards and guidance documents, ISO/FDIS 21542 with
comments column, country columns (state and different countries / regions / cantons if
necessary) (see Annex F)
3. Coverage of user needs in European and EFTA countries and International (see table G.5.1)
4. List of countries/states in EU/EFTA/International for the Inventory and PT A and PT B
members responsible and all country reports (see Annex G)
5. Bibliography with full details of documents, abbreviations used and an indication of whether
the document being considered is general legislation, a building code, a regulation
(statutory), a standard (requirement) or guidance (best practice). It also identifies the level of
functional or technical requirement provided by the documents. Initial evaluation of
suitability for public procurement has also been entered (see section 5).
6. Schemes: Conformity assessment schemes (further explanation in PT B report) (see Annex H)
7. “Access for All” CEBC Report 2007 basic Datacollection and updated 2011 where information
was available(see Annex I).
A traffic light model is introduced with three types of possibilities to answer the question if the
specific requirement covers ISO 21542 requirement (which is the benchmark).
c … comprehensive (green background)
p … partly (yellow background) with a “comment column” why coverage is insufficient
n … not (red background)
An additional “Country Report Form” was developed (see Annex G.1) to identify against each
country considered the relevant building regulation, standards, building codes, guidance documents
and conformity assessment schemes available in that country and their use or effectiveness in the
process of public procurement. Additional information about education of architects, best practices,
funds and awards on accessibility is also included.
It was considered appropriate that concerning construction products for the built environment the
new Construction Products Regulation (CPR) also formed part of this review as accessibility is now
included in basic requirement No.4 “Safety and accessibility in use”. It will be interesting how
accessibility will be further explained and described in support documents and how it is going to
affect CEN standardization work. More information about recent development in the framework of
CPR will be included after the Open Meeting.
-8-
In the review we pointed out which CEN/TCs should cover accessibility requirements in their work.
It was also considered appropriate to review the equality of safety requirements for users between
Lift Directive and Machinery Directive.
Additional information about building design and product standards within ISO where accessibility
should be considered are added although not very many exist.
The inventory of relevant areas of construction works and products within CEN/TCs where
accessibility is insufficient incorporated according to CEN/CENELEC Guide 6 are also part of this
report. In Phase I of the project an overview of existing CEN/TCs and their standards is provided(see
Annex E.5). Issues concerning CEN Standardization and the relevant CEN/TCs (which should include
accessibility requirements in some of their relevant product standards) are described in an inventory
table where some EN standards are already indicated as a first step to be observed.
Whilst individual construction products, such as taps and lifts, may in themselves be designed to
maximise accessibility,it is only by considering how they will, in practice, be incorporated into a
design and how they will actually be used and maintained that will determine how accessible they
are to the people who use them.
3.1.1 Steps for developing this report
It was agreed that members of Project Team A (PT A) and Project Team B (PT B)would cooperate in
the first round of inventory and collection of all relevant data. Each team member took on the
responsibility collecting relevant data from their own country and to contact different
rapporteurs/informants from other relevant European and International countries.
A spread sheet was developed on which to record all of the collected data. Additional forms were
also developed, one to record other relevant information about individual countries (Country Report
Form) and one to record conformity assessment schemes pertenant to each country.
Data was collected from EU Member Countries, 3 EFTA countries and 6 International countries (USA,
Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Singapore and South Africa). See overview table in Annex G.1.
For this report we collected data derived from the common spreadsheet of 23 countries (73 % of
total inhabitants of European Member States):
17 EU countries (Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece,
Hungary, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, UK)
2 EFTA countries (Norway, Switzerland)
4 International countries (Australia, Canada, Singapore, USA)
-9-
Figure 1 – Totality of countries – Spreadsheets Inventory

(73,02 % of European inhabitants covered)
Figure 2 – Totality of countries – Country Reports Inventory

(97,91 % of European inhabitants covered)
29 country reports (97,91 % of European inhabitants are covered) have been sent by accessibility
experts which provides an overview in their country reports about all acessibiltiy related legislation,
standards, best practices, education etc.:
24 EU countries (Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France,
Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland,
Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, UK)
2 EFTA countries (Norway, Switzerland)
4 International countries (Canada, South Africa, USA, Australia)
In phase II the other countries data should be included in the inventory and report if contacts can be
established in the public consultative period.
- 10 -
The data from the CECB study on “Access for All in Europe” (2007) have been updated 2011 and are
included in this study. The previous study from 2007 can be seen here.
http://www.cebc.eu/files/reports/access_for_all_-_cebc_final_-_june_2008.pdf
This CEBC study provides very useful information about access to the built environment in Europe
based on building legislationfor non-domestic buildings and for dwellings.It refers also to accessibility
standards and if they are referenced in any legislation. The data show the level of accessibility with a
range of minimum basic accessibility requirements and are a very comprehensive information to our
inventory.It shows clearly what level of accessibility is achieved in each European member state with
the data updated for most countries in 2011. During the public consultative period this updating
process should be continued to provide the full overview.
Models of the data collection spreadsheet and of the country report form are included in Annex F
and G. An excel table with all inventory data will be delivered with the report to the European
Commission.
3.1.2 Context of the use and user roles (common chapter)
To identify the accessibility requirements for the design and planning of the built environment, for
construction products and services, the following human abilities and the consequences fo
impairments were taken into consideration:
People using a wheelchair
People with walking difficulties
People with vision impairments / blind
People with hearing impairments / deaf
People with reduced manual dexterity / arm function / strength
People with diversities in age and stature
People with intellectual / cognitive / mental impairments
People with allergies
The effects of ageing, and the relevence of appropriate design in creating or eliminating risks and
hazards in the built environment were also considered in each of these areas(see table 3, figure 4)
Figure 3 – Totality of countries – User needs Inventory 81,98 % of European inhabitants covered)
- 11 -
3.2 Inventory
3.2.1 European Standardization Mandates for Accessibility in the built environment
M/283 Safety and usability of products by people with special needs (e.g. elderly and disabled)
M/292 Safety for consumers and children – Product Information
M/293 Safety for consumers and children – Child Safety
M/273 Information and Communications Technologies – ITC for disabled and elderly people
M/350 Sustainability of Construction Works
M/376 Accessibility requirements for public procurement in the ICT Domain
M/420 Accessibility requirements for public procurement in the built environment in co-ordination
with M/376
M/473 Standardization mandate to CEN, CENELEC and ETSI to include “Design for All” in relevant
standardization initiatives (NEW)
3.2.2 Legislation supported by Accessibility Standardization in Europe: Functional and Technical
Requirements in CEN standards
3.2.2.1 CEN/TCs considering accessibility in the built environment
In 2006 the PT A leader has made a study about the implementation of CEN/CENELEC Guide 6 within
relevant CEN/TCs and their draft standards for ANEC (European voice of consumers in
Standardization).The study shows that very less standards are considering accessibilty requirements
within their development. Although the study is now outdated it could be a basis for further research
to study all these relevant standards in detail.
3.2.2.1.1 Inventory on design standards within CEN
The inventory shows very less standards on the design of buildings within CEN/TCs:
CEN/TC 136 ”Sports, playground and other recreational facilities and equipment”
there is one work item under discussion ”Play for all”.
CEN/TC 315 “Spectator facilities”
With these relevant standards:
- prEN 13200-1 rev. Spectator facilities - Part 1: General characteristics for spectator viewing
area (dav 2013-01)
- CEN/TR 13200-2:2005 Spectator facilities - Layout criteria of service area - Part 2:
Characteristics and national situations
- CEN/TR 15913:2009 Spectator facilities - Layout criteria for viewing area for spectators with
special needs
- EN 13200-3:2005 Spectator facilities - Part 4: Seats - Product characteristics
The other standards and technical reports have to be checked in phase II.
CEN/TC 325 ”Prevention of crime in urban planning and building design”
several standards, technical specifications have been already published about building design. In the
past PT A leader has made some efforts to raise more awareness on implementation of
CEN/CENELEC Guide 6 requirements which was also stated in a resolution but not followed by
further actions by TC 325.
Findings:The published standards (published as technical specifications) from CEN/TC 325 have no
requirements according accessibilty included, These are:
- 12 -
- CEN/TR 14383-2 “Prevention of crime – urban planning and building design”

- CEN/TS 14383-3 “Prevention of crime – Dwellings”
- CEN/TS 14383-4 “Prevention of crime – Shops and offices”
- CEN/TS 14383-7 “Prevention of crime – Design and management of public transport facilities”
(compare with TSI PRM legislation!)
Recommendations
Should be checked further in phase II.
CEN/TC 350 “Sustainability of construction works”4
WG 5 is focusing on “Social Performance assessment of buidlings”.
The standards of CEN/TC 350 will describe a harmonised methodology for assessment of
environmental performance of buildings and life cycle cost performance of buildings as well as the
quantifiable performance aspects of health and comfort of buildings for new and existing
construction works. It is important to consider that people are spending 90 % of their times within
buildings.
The standards will be generally applicable (horizontal) and relevant for the assessment of integrated
performance of buildings over its life cycle.
In order to assess the integrated performance of buildings it is necessary to regard a building as a
whole with required performance and functions to fulfil. Consequently, during its life cycle, from raw
material supply of building products to the final disposal of building components, a building has
environmental and economic impacts as well as impacts on the health & comfort of the users.
To get an overall picture on the integrated performance of a building, these impacts must be
analysed with the building as an object of the assessment of environmental performance,
economic performance and health & comfort performance of building.
Findings:
Accessibility is indicated in the following draft standards:
- prEN 15643-1 Sustainability of Construction Works - Part 1; General Framework and also in
- prEN 15643-3 Sustainability of Construction Works - Part 3: Framework for the assessment of
social performance.
- prEN 16309 Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of social performance of
buildings - Methods
Recommendation:
According an integral approach on sustainability not only environmental and or energy related
declarations of the construction works or products should be considered to be important. An integral
building declaration (building passport) focusing on the intended-use of construction works including
life-cycle costs, performance aspects on health and comfort including accessibility could be
developed within this CEN/TC 350.
Consider also Annex E.1.1 where more information aboutthe goals of CEN/TC 350 are described.
3.2.2.1.2 Inventory on product standards within CEN
In general implementation of accessibility in the built environment is more a design issue than use of
4
More information on www.cenorm.be and BSI-Website: http://www.bsigroup.com/Standards-and-
Publications/Committee-Members/Construction-committee-members-area/M350-Standards/?id=158921
- 13 -
specific accessible products with some exceptions mentioned below.

More detailed information about relevant CEN/TCs on products can be seen in Annex E.1.2.Here only
the most relevant CEN/TCs are listed. In phase II further guidance should be developed on missing
areas where standards with accessibility requirements are needed.
It’s a fact that accessibility requirements based on CEN/CENELEC Guide 6 “factors to consider” have
been more or less ignored within CEN Standardization on building products until now due to missing
inclusion in the former Construction Product Directive. Only very few committees had sufficient
awareness e.g. lifts, doors, walking surface guiding lines, ergonomics. A questionnaire from ANEC
shows that only 5 % of all CEN/TCs even know CEN/CENELEC Guide 6.
CEN/TC 10 “Lifts, escalators and moving walks”
EN 81-70 “Safety rules for the construction and installations of lifts - Particular applications for
passenger and good passengers lifts - Part 70: Accessibility to lifts for persons including persons
with disability”
- application various across Europe: EN 81-70 is not used for all lifts for passengers including
persons with disabilities
- the lift requirements for mobility impaired persons are considered frequently but less
awareness about requirements for sensory disabilities
- lift car type 1 should be deleted in next revision or be restricted for refurbishment in existing
buildings only with minor public frequency
A questionnaire will be started soon about the use of this lift type within Europe. This will give the
starting point for the future revesion process in autumn 2011.
- EN 81-41 “Vertical platform lifts”: usability for all wheelchair users or only restricted use? (hold
to run control is not usable for electrical wheelchair users)
- EN 81-40 “Safety rules for the construction and installation of lifts - Special lifts for the
transport of persons and goods - Part 40: Stairlifts and inclined lifting platforms intended for
persons with impaired mobility”
- CEN/TS 81-76 “Safety rules for the construction and installation of lifts - Particular applications
for passengers and goods passenger lifts - Part 76: Evacuation of disabled persons using lifts”
- CEN/TS 81-82 “Safety rules for the construction and installation of lifts - Existing lifts - Part 82:
Improvement of the accessibility of existing lifts for persons including persons with disability”
CEN/TC 33 “Doors, windows, shutters and building hardware”
- Different classes of operating forces for doors are already included in EN 12217 and could be
referenced in national building regulation, guidance documents or standards.
CEN/TC 72 “Fire detection and fire alarm systems” + CEN/TC 192 “Fire service equipment”
- Fire alarms via the 2 sense-principle, visual alarms, voice alarm control mobile fire extinguisher
usable for all, etc.
CEN/TC 163 “Sanitary appliances” + CEN/TC 67 “Ceramic tiles”
- aspects of surface finish and slippery resistance, ease of handling, usability of washbasins,
CEN/TC 183 “Waste management”
- ease of handling of waste containers
CEN/TC 207 “Furniture”
- standards on different kind of furniture: tables, chairs, desks etc. – usable also for wheelchair
users
- 14 -
CEN/TC 169 “Lighting”

- performance requirements for lighting for vision impaired persons, emergency lighting,
lighting for signposting, wayfinding and orientation.
etc.
3.2.3 ISO Standardisation relevant for accessibility of the built environment
Considering the procedure according the Vienna agreement between CEN and ISO, where ISO
standards can become CEN Standards it should be noted that this procedure has been already failed
some years ago on ISO 21542. One of the main reasons was the lack of development of the draft. In
addition, European Member States who had higher requirements than those identified in the ISO
standard where not in agreement with the implementation of the Vienna agreement for an EN
standard which was connected with an obligation to withdraw their national standard in the same
area.
The Vienna agreement could be used to implement ISO 21542 as a technical report or technical
specification within CEN. This creates no obligation to withdraw existing national accessibility
standards. In the meantime, work on a common European accessibility standard could be started
immediately based on ISO 21542 and incorporating missing areas from other good reference
documents.
ISO/TC 59 “Buildings and civil engineers works”
- ISO/TC 59 SC 16 “Accessibility and usability of the built environment” is developing the
standard ISO/FDIS 21542 “Accessibility and usability of the built environment”. This standard
covers not the whole built environment. It covers buildings and their immediate surroundings
only.Considering a future European standard the ISO 21542 could be a good starting point and
basis with comprehensive requirements (see more analysis in 3.2.4.5).It should also be noted
that the Vienna agreement procedure has been failed some years ago on ISO 21542/CD when
the standard was not fardeveloped. Within the enquiry stage only one country voted negative
(Japan). This demonstrates the world-wide acceptance of this draft. Japan argued only that
they wanted to have a technical report or guidance document and not a standard.The final
draft voting procedure has been started now.
ISO/TC 178 “Lifts, escalators and moving walks”
- This ISO/TC acts in close co-operation with CEN/TC 10 standards development.
3.2.4 Comparison of ISO/FDIS 21542 with some leading non-EU standards
In this chapter a comparison of ISO/FDIS 21542 with some leading non-EUstandards as indicated
below is provided. The goal is a selection of a baseline accessibility standard focusing on content and
scope comparison.
Americans with Disabilities Standards for Accessible Design 2010 (ADASAD 2110) and
ISO/FDIS 21542 Accessibility and Usability of the Built Environment (ISO)
Australian Standards
National Building Code of Canada
Background of the Review
The CEN/BTWG 207 project has considered the guidance currently available in a considerable
number of countries in both the EU and internationally.
At the meeting in Brussels in January 2011, consideration was given to the setting-up or selection of a
base-line standard guidance document which could be identified in the procurement process as the
minimum acceptable level of accessibility required for any publicly funded built environment project
in EU member countries.
- 15 -
Such a base-line standard would not take precedence over national standards available in EU
member countries but could be used by procurers to ensure that a minimum standard of accessibility
could be set where none currently exists.
The discussions centred on adopting the guidance or regulations associated with several
international countries such as the US, Australia and Canada or that contained ISO/FDIS 21542.
This Review considers the documents available for each of these countries and the ISO and makes
recommendations as to which of them is considered more appropriate to be considered as a base-
line accessibility standard for use in the EU.
3.2.4.1 Americans with Disabilities Act Standards for Accessible Design (ADASAD 2010)
Generally
With regard to scope of the legislation and guidance the ADASAD 2010 states that:
“The 1991 Standards and the 2010 Standards apply to fixed or built-in elements of buildings,
structures, site improvements, and pedestrian routes or vehicular ways located on a site.”
The 2010 Standards set minimum requirements – both scoping and technical – for newly designed
and constructed or altered State and local government facilities, public accommodations, and
commercial facilities to be readily accessible to and usable by disabled people. All State and local
government facilities must follow the requirements of the standards described in the ADASAD 2010.
The ADASAD identifies the applicability of the requirements for a range of building uses. In general
terms however, the comments made focus more on addressing accessibility issues associated with
the provision of the physical environment and the requirements and rights of people with restricted
mobility and wheelchair users. No substantial comments are made regarding the needs of other
potential users including, for example, people with sensory impairments (vision or hearing), those
with learning disabilities or learning difficulties, cognitive impairments, children or older people.
In certain situations exemptions are permitted. These relate to the provision of physical features
within an environment such as lifts and for reasons of structural impracticability.
However, there appears to be no parallel requirement or guidance for the providers of those services
or opportunities that cannot be reached because of the exemption to consider alternative ways of
delivering them to disabled people. Such interventions could include for example altering their
management policies, practices and procedures to ensure that discrimination against disabled people
does not occur.
This illustrates an emphasis within the guidance on the provision of physical accessibility rather than
on increasing the opportunities and involvement of disabled people by removing discrimination.
The use of terminology such as ‘disproportionality’ with regard to costs, the identification of a
financial limit, and the list of priority actions (Section 36. 403 (e and f)) could also be
counterproductive in ensuring that designers and developers address their primary anti-
discrimination responsibility. This responsibility is to ensure that the final built environment they
produce doesnot discriminate against any individual.
To some extent such issues segregate the ADASAD from other accessibility guidance and anti-
discrimination legislation found in other countries and in supporting documents such as ISO/FDIS
21542.
3.2.4.1.1 Scope of the detailed Guidance
Generally
ADASAD contains guidance on many of the issues associated with the design of buildings and spaces
to meet the needs of disabled people. It covers access standards for many of the main areas
including the approach to a building, entrances and doors, lifts, stairs, sanitary facilities,
- 16 -
communication systems (equipment and signage), as well as different building uses such as
residential, health education and leisure.
A positive aspect of the ADASAD guidance is the extent to which it clarifies for designers and others
what it applies to and where it is mandatory. Guidance for alterations of existing and historic
buildings is also useful as are the inclusion of ranges of data and dimensions which allow the designer
to select the best fit.
On the downside, the format and style of presentation of the ADASAD guidance is not particularly
user friendly.
There are also several areas that are either not covered or sparsely covered in the ADASAD of which
the following are examples.
Designing for children and people of short stature
In addition to identifying how to address the needs of disabled adults when using the built
environment, the guidance within the ADASAD also includes some anthropometric data and
guidance on addressing the needs of children and people of short stature. Whilst the inclusion of this
data is very useful, unfortunately the way the guidance is presented suggests that consideration is
only necessary for the design of environments and facilities that are intended to be used; or might
frequently be used by them rather than for the built environment generally.
For children, this includes play areas, toilets and dining facilities and for people of short stature in the
provision of toilets and ATM machines. As an example, guidance is given on the need to provide a
second handrail suitable for children on staircases, but goes on to suggest that this need only be
considered for buildings “When children are the principal users in a building (e.g. elementary
schools)”.
There is no requirement to address the needs of adults with short stature or children regarding the
provision of handrails on stairs in the general everyday environments they use. In addition, the needs
of children or people of short stature are not considered in the general provision of the built
environment, for example, vision panels in doors.
Environmental contributors to inclusive, accessible design
Whilst the ADASAD covers most of the issues related to accessibility for wheelchair users or people
with restricted mobility, guidance related to the needs of people with sensory impairments, learning
difficulties or other impairments, is limited. In terms of hearing impairments the guidance covers the
installation of technical interventions such as the provision of induction loops, but does not offer any
guidance on the environmental factors that affect communication for deaf people such as the use of
colour, contrast, lighting and acoustics. Indeed there is a dearth of general guidance on how to
enhance the usability of a space for disabled and non-disabled people by the appropriate design of
such environmental factors.
In terms of colour and visual contrast, comment is restricted in the main to their use on signage,
tactile surfaces and keypads. For stairs, it is only a requirement to ‘consider’ the use of contrasted
nosings on steps.
No mention is made on the importance of colour, light, contrast and acoustics in creating inclusive,
accessible places and spaces for all users (especially for those with sensory, mental and cognitive
impairments). Also, no guidance is given on how to enhance a design by incorporating their
appropriate use. For example, whilst the term ‘visual contrast’ is used in the guidance it does not say
how it may be specified or measured.
Lighting, in terms of a measured value (lux), is not mentioned except insofar as it relates to
recommended illuminance within a lift car. Most comments relating to the lighting, which is a major
factor in the usability and accessibility of an environment for all users, are confined to issues around
signage and the external transport and pedestrian environment.
- 17 -
Management
In general, the ADASAD considers accessibility and the usability of environments for disabled people
in terms of the provision of the actual physical environment.
It does not consider or offer advice on the use of non-physical interventions such as changes in
management practices, policies and procedures, or in staff training to reduce or remove
discrimination and enhance accessibility.
This is of particular importance to existing situations such as those related to historic buildings where
permission to improve access can be refused by the relevant authorities if the alteration work may
affect the historic integrity of the building. Without a parallel requirement in such situations to also
consider the development of alternative management interventions, for example virtual
walkthroughs or spoken descriptions, disabled people not only lose out on physical access, they also
miss out on enjoying the ‘experience’ of historic environment as well.
Other Issues
There are accessibility issues identified in the ADASAD that may not be relevant to a general base-
line European wide standard. These include for example the design and provision of recreational
facilities such as shooting facilities, amusement rides and recreational boating facilities.
The ADASAD incorporates many ‘Advisory’ notes throughout the document to give additional
information to designers. In the main however, ‘Advisory’ notes are used simply to explain or
reinforce the requirement of the regulation. They give examples of how it can be met rather than
offer an explanation to the design team of the reasoning behind it.
Whilst using ‘Advisory’ notes in this way may increase the clarity of what is required it does nothing
to inform the design team of the ‘why’ the regulation exists.
In that respect the general thrust of the ADASAD guidance appears to be one of specification rather
than the laying down of performance objectives, illustrating how they can be met, and providing
sufficient additional background information to encourage or enable design teams to develop
alternative, equally acceptable, solutions.
Whilst the ADASAD is based on credible information, its scope in terms of providing guidance on the
design of environments and spaces for people other than those with mobility impairments is much
more limited than ISO/FDIS 21542.
For use as an EU wide base-line guidance standard, the lack of informative information and in-depth
comments on human abilities, behavioural characteristics of users and management interventions in
documents like the ADASAD may restrict the opportunities for designers to develop innovative yet
perfectly acceptable alternative solutions.
3.2.4.2 Australian Standards
Generally
The Disability (Access to Premises – Buildings) Standards 2010 (Premises Standards) sets
performance requirements and provides references to technical specifications to ensure dignified
access to and use of buildings for disabled people. The Premises Standards clarify the non-
discrimination provisions of the 1992 Australian Disability Discrimination Act (ADDA) in relation to
the design and management of the built environment. Complying with the Premises Standard
satisfies the ADDA for those issues that the Standards cover.
It is proposed that the Premises Standard will come into effect on the 1 May 2011, in line with the
adoption of the Building Code of Australia in each State and Territory. This will allow States and
Territories time to adopt the Premises Standards within their building law frameworks.
The Premises standards will introduce some major changes from the building code access
requirements currently in place in Australia. For example there will be increased requirements for
- 18 -
leisure activities, such as access to public swimming pools and facilities, and places of
accommodation such as hotels, motels and holiday lets.
Horizontal and vertical circulation within buildings will also see increased requirements for lifts,
accessible entrances, circulation spaces, turning spaces etc as well as improved requirements for
signage, accessible spaces in cinemas and theatres, and the provision of facilities for hearing aid
users. There will also be significant increases in the numbers and locations of uni-sex accessible toilet
facilities.
Scope of Detailed Guidance
A detailed suite of standards currently exists under the title AS/NZ 1428 to give detailed guidance to
designers of the provision of accessible buildings. In the main however, the individual documents
within this suite are not stand alone and a considerable amount of cross referencing is required to
achieve guidance on particular issues. For example the guidance given in AS 1482.1 “General
requirements for access – new building work” relating to lifts, is to refer the reader to another
standard AS 1735.12. Obtaining guidance therefore requires the availability of more than one
standard, all of which must be purchased individually.
Whilst a good level and scope of guidance exists within the Australian standards, the fact that the
new Premises Standard is not in applicable until mid 2011 has made an accurate comparison difficult
to undertake. However, there is evidence of good practice in the standards adopted in Australian
that would positively inform the formation of text for a new EU wide standard should one be
developed in the future.
3.2.4.3 The National Building Code of Canada 2010 (NBC)
Generally
The NBC is a model building code that is not enforceable unless a province or territory adopts it.
Some jurisdictions in Canada create their own code based on the NBC whilst other jurisdictions have
adopted the NBC and added additional laws or regulations to supplement the requirements
contained in it.
For most construction undertaken under federal jurisdiction the NBC is the applicable Code. The
property under federal jurisdiction includes for example, military bases, federal government land,
first nation reserves and airports.
Scope of Guidance
The 2010 edition of the National Building Code of Canada incorporates significant technical changes
from the 2005 edition. It sets out technical provisions for the design and construction of new
buildings and also applies to the alteration, change of use and demolition of existing buildings.
The NBC is in two volumes. Volume 1 contains Division A (compliance options, objectives,
functional statements) and its appendix, Division C (administrative provisions) and its appendix as
well as a new section containing the attributions to the acceptable solutions. Volume 2 contains
Division B (acceptable solutions) and its appendices as well as the index.
In terms of Accessibility, the NBC Objectives on Accessibility (OA) identify their main aim as being to
minimise the risk of the design and construction of a building unacceptably restricting a person with
physical or sensory impairments from gaining access to and using both the building and its facilities.
It also introduces the concept of creating “barrier-free path of travel” and “barrier-free facilities to
ensure this main objective is met.
3.2.4.4 Accessibility Design Standards – City of Toronto 2004
There is a considerable source of good practice guidance available in the documents set up by
various territories. In 2011, Ontario will see the publication of a new ‘Integrated Accessibility
Standard” which builds on and extends the 2004 standard.
- 19 -
Whilst shortly to be superseded the 2004 Standard itself contains excellent guidance both in terms of
content and presentation for those involved in the design and delivery of accessible buildings and
spaces.
Advice on addressing the needs of most users is given in the guidance and applies across all elements
of the physical environment and a comprehensive range of different building use classes. There is
clear and comprehensive information on issues such as environmental factors including acoustics,
colour, contrast, and both exterior and interior lighting. It also considers and advises on longer-term
issues such as the importance of management and staff training in the on-going process of delivering
accessibility.
Whilst simply adopting the document as an EU wide standard would not be possible due to some
differences in its contents with the internationally developed ISO/FDIS 21542, the document is very
easy to follow. It is succinct and well illustrated and would be an excellent model to be considered for
informing the preparation and presentation of an EU wide standard.
3.2.4.5 ISO/FDIS 21542 Accessibility and Usability of the Built Environment (ISO)
Generally
The ISO/FDIS 21542 Standard is the result of collaboration or involvement of some 28 countries (EU
and Non-EU) world-wide. It has been prepared to provide recommendations and guidance on the
creation and management of inclusive, accessible buildings and spaces. It is intended to assist design
and construction professionals, building owners, users, and those who will manage the built
environment when in use.
ISO/FDIS 21542 not only provides guidance on how to design the physical features of an environment
to provide accessibility, it also identifies the influence of effective management interventions in
creating fully accessible, inclusive and usable places for people to use.
Foremost in deciding the level of accessibility that is appropriate is the aim to ensure that wherever
possible everyone using a building or space should be able to do so conveniently, with dignity, safely
and, wherever possible, independently.
ISO/FDIS 21542 identifies the objectives, design considerations, requirements and recommendations
necessary to produce accessible and usable buildings.
“This International Standard should lead to continuous improvement in the built environment.
Whilst the objectives always remain unchanged, the means of achieving them is part of a
continuing process of change, i.e. as human knowledge and building technology improve and as
the relationship between generally accepted building practice and technology alters.”
ISO/FDIS 21542
Whilst ISO/FDIS 21542 is applicable to both new and existing built environments, the guidance
specifically related to existing buildings is more limited.
Scope and Detailed Guidance
In addition to covering most of the technical requirements included in ADASAD in terms of
addressing the needs of people with restricted mobility, the guidance within ISO/FDIS 21542 is more
comprehensive with respect to addressing the needs disabled and non-disabled people in general.
For example, ISO/FDIS 21542 offers guidance on how to provide environments and spaces that
address the needs of people with sensory impairments (vision and hearing) and people with mental,
cognitive and psychological impairments. Practical guidance to address the needs of non-disabled
groups including older people and children is also more detailed and informative.
As an example, with regard to the use of colour (58 references), lighting (75 references) and contrast
(102 references), the guidance clearly identifies the importance of such issues to the overall
accessibility of the built environment. For lighting, the ADASAD has only one reference for minimum
- 20 -
specified illuminance (for lift cars), whereas ISO/FDIS 21542 has some 15 references to
recommended illuminance covering many aspects of the built environment.
The importance of appropriately designing the acoustical properties of a space to enhance
communication and wayfinding is also addressed in ISO/FDIS 21542 but is not referred to in ADASAD.
ISO/FDIS 21542 also makes some 7 specific detailed references for addressing the needs of children
when using the general built environment.
As it current stands, there are gaps in the guidance contained in ISO/FDIS 21542, which will require
further research or the adoption of guidance from other recognised standards. These include for
example external audible signage and wayfinding systems, children’s play areas, public external
spaces, bus facilities, cycle parking, and accessible beaches. However, the CEN/BTWG 207 project has
identified several reliable sources from which guidance can be gathered to close these gaps.
Management
ISO/FDIS 21542 incorporates a group of comprehensive set of Annexes that contain informative
information about human abilities, management and behaviour characteristics of users in certain
situations, for example when egressingin an emergency.
Such information is of vital importance to those designers who wish to meet the performance
objectives of published good practice guidance on accessibility (either in the ISO/FDIS 21542 or other
national standards) but who may also wish to enjoy the freedom to explore and develop creative
alternatives without compromising accessibility. These Annexes are an invaluable source of
information to designers, which is not covered as comprehensively in the ADASAD.
3.2.4.6 Conclusion on comparison of ISO/FDIS 21542 with other leading non-EU standards
ISO/FDIS 21542 is a document that has been prepared with input by 28 countries worldwide and
represents a broad understanding and acceptance of what constitutes good practice in terms of
access to the built environment and how that can be achieved.
In preparing the ISO/FDIS 21542, guidance was drawn from a wide range of national standards and
this is accompanied by a comprehensive set of references and Annexes to support and give
credibility to the guidance given.
It is important to note here that Australia, Canada and the US were all participating countries in
the development of ISO/FDIS 21542. In the adoption ballot of all participating countries following
the development of the ISO both Canada and the US voted in favour of its adoption although some
conditions were attached to the vote from Canada. Australia abstained.
However, whilst ISO/FDIS 21542 enjoyed input from a broad range of countries worldwide, not all
EU member countries were represented. It is also subject to a final acceptance vote by
participating countries and discussion is still ongoing about some of the final detail.
In light of the technical review and the comments given above, it is recommended that there is no
single document which can serve as a complete EU reference document for the design and
procurement of an accessible built environment.
We conclude that ISO/FDIS 21542 (when fully agreed) could be used, rather than the ADASAD,
Australian or Canadian standards, as the base-line accessibility standard which must be completed
with clauses from other good guidance documents, in order to cover certain gaps and weaknesses,
so as to cover adequately all aspects of buildings, outdoor areas and other built infrastructure.
However, there are many areas of good practice guidance and presentation techniques within these
other standards that could and should be used to inform any future development of ISO/FDIS 21542
towards being an EU wide applicable accessibility reference document (standard).
- 21 -
3.3 Analysis of gaps

3.3.1 Inventory of national and international legal requirements and advisory measures for
ensuring accessibility of the built environment
3.3.1.1 Types of documents
Approximately 300 documents have been checked for coverage of accessibility requirements by 1
November 2010, and all have been categorised under the headlines of:
– general legislation
– building code
– technical regulation
– standard
– guideline
Furthermore it has been noted whether they primarily describe functional or technical requirements
under each headline. It should be noted, however, that documents may fall into several
categories.(see Annex Fand separate Excel table)
3.3.1.2 Coverage of functional and technical requirements
Table 1 – Number of general legislation, building code, technical regulations, standards

and guides within European Member states
Type GENERAL TECHNICAL

LEGISLATION BUILDING CODE REGULATION STANDARD GUIDELINE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
Total 63 28 40 36 57 57 50 72 120 119
Observations:
– Guidelines and technical regulations form the main basis of the inventory, standards and
building codes occurring less frequently
– 2/3 of documents are of functional as well as technical nature
3.3.1.3 Coverage of building elements by all types of documents
The preliminary document inventory indicates that all building elements seem to be covered
comprehensively when viewed across all countries and types of documents. No partial or absolute
gaps were found within the selected 4 main areas:
– External Environments and Approaches to Buildings
– Internal Environments
– Transport Facilities
– Specific Building Uses
3.3.1.4 Coverage of external environments and approaches to buildings, all documents
Preliminary conclusions:
– all elements covered comprehensively by many documents
- 22 -
3.3.1.5 Coverage of internal environments, all documents

– all elements are comprehensively covered by many documents
– indoor climate scores just one document with comprehensive coverage, but conclusion is
questionable as very few responses in second round on this additional element were
received
3.3.1.6 Coverage of transport facilities, all documents
– all elements comprehensively covered by several documents
– cycle parking scores lowest; 4 documents with comprehensive coverage
3.3.1.7 Coverage of specific building uses, all documents
– all building elements are covered comprehensively by many documents
– in general less documents on specific building uses than on external and internal
environments
– gas/petrol stations scores low with 4 documents comprehensive coverage
– ports score lowest with 5 partial coverage documents only, but conclusion is questionable as
very few responses were received on this element in second round
3.3.1.8 Combined coverage of building elements by country/state/region, - alldocuments
– all countries report several gaps in their combined coverage of user requirements.
– many have no or only partial coverage of close to half of all building elements
– countries that report no missing coverage (equal to zero in the last column 'None') by
inspection show to simply not have answered on all building elements.
– the countries that report the highest degree of coverage are in the top of the table.
Important notes:
– coverage is reported on the basis of all types of documents in each country
– Ddifferences in approach of rapporteurs may have influence on ratings, and adjustments may
be introduced during the next stage
3.3.1.9 High degree of coverage, single documents
– Several single documents could be candidates for further development towards a European
Standard with almost full coverage of all building elements.
– The single documents reported to have the most comprehensive coverage of all building
elements are listed in the table above.
Important notes:
– differences in approach of rapporteurs may have influence on ratings, and adjustments may
be introduced during the next stage
- 23 -
3.3.1.10 Estimate on potential suitability in public procurement

– close to 40 % of documents found are reported to have high potential suitability as technical
specifications and criteria for awarding public contracts
– approximately 30 % of documents are reported as suitable for guidance for different levels of
adapting existing buildings
– an in depth analysis of the documents and their coverage of building elements may lead to
pointing to several documents that combine high suitability and comprehensive coverage
3.3.1.11 Technical and functional requirements
– general legislation documents are more functional than technical in nature
– standards show the opposite tendency
– building code, technical regulations and guidelines show a balance between functional and
technical types of requirements
– two thirds of documents are of dual nature
What are functional accessibility requirements and technical performance criteria?
Functional requirements describe what shall be possible to do /to perform. An example:
Wheelchairusers shall be able to use the entrance. Or in a more detailed level: Wheelchairusers shall
be able to pass through the entrancedoor.
Technical performance criteriadescribetechnical criteriafor fulfilling the functional criteria and are
needed to make it possible to verify the functional critera. One example: To make it possible for
wheelchairusers to pass the door, the doorwidth shall be min xx mm. Often the performance critera is
implicit and the formulation simplified to “The doorwidth shall be min xx mm.”Still it should be
regarded as a technical performance criterion.
Mandate 420 requests in our report:
An analysis of whether they describe functional requirements or information on the technical
performance criteria (including on construction products) shall be provided.
(b) An analysis of gaps identifying areas in the accessibility to the built environment where no
standards, building codestechnical regulations or guidance documents exist or where the existing
standards , building codes, technical regulations or guidance documents need to be complemented
to have a comprehensive European standard.
This analysis should distinguish between
- functional accessibility requirements and
- a range of minimum technical performance criteria to comply with those functional
requirements.
3.3.2 Inventory of national legal requirements in the built environment in European MS
with reference to accessibility standards
– only 4 countries have building regulation with reference to accessibility standards: Austria,
Ireland, Slovenia and United Kingdom
– Germany and Switzerland have also reference to their accessibility standard but only partly
and on very unequal level in the different regions (countries), cantons and communities –
few countries / cantons are more advanced than others
- 24 -
with unequal approach in regions, countries, cantons and communities

– 2 countries have considerabledifferences among their regional building regulations: Austria
and Spain, Austria has already implemented the harmonisation concept with OIB Guideline 4
in seven of nine regional building regulations and Spain has new guidance documents which
are applied now in the whole country on equal level
– 3 countries have due to their federal structure also differences in the implementation of
accessibility: Belgium, Germany and United Kingdom
with guidance documents referred to in the regulation
– 15 countries have guidance documents referred to in building regulation: Austria (new
approach concept), Croatia, Cyprus, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy Latvia,
Netherlands, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom and Switzerland.
without any reference to standards or guidance documents
– 13 countries have all accessibility requirements established within building regulation and no
reference to any standards or guidance documents: Belgium, Czech Republic, Estonia,
Finland, France, Hungary, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia,
Sweden
without referenceto the building regulation
– Denmark and Norwayhave got accessibility standardsnot judicially referred to in the building
regulation, and has therefore of minor importance and less implementation
See table 2about correlation between building regulation / guidance documents and accessibility
standards in European MS on next page
- 25 -
Table 2 – Correlation between building regulation / guidance documents and accessibility standards in European Member States
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Switzerland
Correlation between Building
Czech Rep.
total sum
Lithuania
Germany
Denmark
Romania
Portugal
Slovenia
Hungary
Slovakia
Bulgaria
Belgium
Sweden
Regulation and Standards in
Norway
Finland
Estonia
Croatia
Iceland
Austria
Ireland
Greece
Poland
Cyprus
France
Latvia
Malta
Spain
Europe
Italy
UK
Type 1 Building regulation with
standards referred to in the R R 7
regulation
Type 2 Building regulation with

14
guidance documents referred to
in the regulation
Type 3 Building regulation
without standards referred to in 15
the regulations
National accessibility standard
available without reference to 1
legislation
Different regional building
regulation in regions, countries
and communities with different
5
references
Buidling regulation only
Regulation with guidance
Standard only partly applied R
- 26 -
3.3.3 Inventory of user need coverage on accessibility requirements of the built environment
Table 3 - User needs coverage in European and EFTA countries and International (including ISO 21542)
Inter-
User Needs EU countries EFTA
national
(indicated for each country
United Kingdom
with
Czech Republic
Liechtenstein
Generally, partly or not
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Switzerland
covered: G/P/N and
Lithuania
Germany
Denmark
Romania
ISO 2142
CANADA
Portugal
Hungary
Slovenia
Slovakia
Bulgaria
Belgium
Sweden
Norway
Estonia
Finland
Austria
Ireland
Greece
indicated with our colours
Poland
Cyprus
France
Latvia
Malta
Spain
ADA
Italy
green/yellow/orange)
People using a wheelchair c c c c c c c c p c c c c c c p c c c p c c c c c

People with walking
c c c c c c c c p c c c c c p c c c c p c c c c
difficulties
People with reduced manual
dexterity / arm function / c p c c p p p n c c p c p p c n c c p c p c c
strength
People with vision
c p c c p c c c p c c c c p c p c n c p n c c c c
impairments / blind
People with Hearing impair-
c p c c p p c p p c c p p p c p c n c n p c p c c
ments / deaf
People with Intellectual /
cognitive / mental c p c p p p p p n c n p n p n p p n c n p c p c p
impairments
People with allergies p n c n p n n p n n n n n n n n n n n n n p n c n
People with diversities in
c p c c p c c p p p p c n n n n n p n p c c c
age and stature
- 27 -
3.3.3.1 Comments on coverage of User Needs

Generally
The Table identifies that within the EU Member countries and the other countries studied the
availability of design guidance and regulations related to the different user needs identified is fairly
consistent across the board. The project has identified that there are areas where a good level of
comprehensive guidance and regulation is available but worrying there are also clear areas where
the needs of some user groups are not being addressed at all in the available guidance.
Findings
As would be expected by those involved in the field of inclusive design, most EU Member countries
enjoy access to a good comprehensive range of guidance for people with mobility impairments, and
especially for those who use a wheelchair as their mobility aid and people who experience difficulties
with walking.
Across EU Member countries, guidance for people with other physical impairments such as reduced
manual dexterity, arm function and strength is less comprehensive although only a few Member
countries have no guidance at all on such issues.
The needs of people with sensory impairments (vision and hearing) are covered in most EU member
countries but there is a clear indication that the depth of guidance and regulation available is
substantially less comprehensive than it is for people with mobility impairments. However,
comprehensive guidance does exist in some EU Member countries on which others can build.
Of more concern are the areas of user needs where no guidance or regulation exists at all. These
include issues related to people with allergies, where there is a clear and worrying lack of existence
of guidance across all EU Member countries, and issues related to people with intellectual, cognitive
and mental impairments.
For people with allergies, some 75% of the countries considered do not cover the issue at all. The
situation for people with intellectual, cognitive and mental impairments is better but the evidence
suggests that with only some 25% of countries having comprehensive guidance on the issue there are
clear deficiencies in the scope and coverage of guidance available across the board.
Indeed even in addressing the needs of people of short stature and older people, only about 30% of
countries examined have guidance or regulation that could be considered to be comprehensive.
Conclusion
Whilst there is evidence to suggest that some EU Member Countries enjoy good comprehensive
coverage across all user groups, (e.g. Norway, Sweden, Austria, France, Poland, Switzerland and the
UK), it would appear that the guidance available in international documents such as the ISO and
those relevant to Canada are more comprehensive than any produced by individual EU Member
countries.
3.3.4 Inventory of national country reports of existing legislation / standards / guides on
accessibility requirements of the built environment
3.3.4.1 Legislation and Standardization
Our analysis shows, that accessibility of the built environment is covered within different laws and on
different levels (antidiscrimination act, equal treatment on workplace, UN-Convention, public
transport and traffic issues, ...), depending on the political structure of the respective country.
Generally, the member states are responsible for their building regulation, which is partly influenced
by the European Union through mandatory EU legislation. Examples are the Construction Product
Regulation, which is based now on 7 basis requirements for the whole building (relevant for
marketing of construction products), and the TSI-PRM legislation especially for railway stations. Thus,
EU legislation has an influence on national building regulations.
- 28 -
Nevertheless, we have a range of different approaches regarding legislation on accessibility among

European MS, whereas there are accessibility standards with similar approach in most of the
countries. Mainly, those different approaches occur concerning two issues – consistent accessibility
legislation within the countries on the one hand, and implementation of accessibility standards
within legislation on the other. According to this, the table below provides an overview of the
correlation between building regulation and standards in each European country.
In many cases (e.g. Austria, Belgium, Germany, Spain, Switzerland and UK and especially in states
with federal structure), there is no consistent building regulation for the whole country. Regional
authorities (federal states/cantons/provinces/communities) carry the responsibility for writing as
well as for supervising compliance with the building regulation. For example, in Switzerland it was
not possible to get a clear answer from professional architects regarding the requirements for
accessibility of the built environment, because it depends on the respective canton and communities.
Architects have to negotiate every building project when they request a building permit. Therefore,
the level of accessibility differs a lot: some communities have high awareness on the subject and
strongly focus on accessibility in their guidelines; others only have basic requirements included.
In terms of standards and guidelines, different levels of importance and acceptance status are shown
among the European countries. In German speaking countries, standards on accessibility have high
importance and are well known as “state of the art” – e.g. SIA 500 in Switzerland. Procurement
procedures require solutions, which are “state of the art”. Thus, standards on accessibility are used in
order to ensure compliance. Architects are more or less responsible for its implementation; to what
extent differs a lot and depends on the functional (and technical) requirements of the building
regulation. Building regulation does not always refer to existing accessibility standards. In many
countries, all accessibility requirements are covered within building regulation. Thus, standards are
no accepted tools (e.g. Romania), do not seem to be necessary because of the detailed information
within the building regulation itself (e.g. Sweden) or are replaced by other tools (e.g. checklists in
Denmark).
Building regulation often has implemented more functional than technical requirements. According
to the ‘new approach concept’ it becomes more important to reference technical standards within
functional requirements. Austria provides a good example of this issue. The harmonised building
regulation - based on the concept of the EU Public Procurement Directive – with six essential
requirements including accessibility in Guideline 4 since 2008 has been implemented within the
building regulation in seven of nine federal states by 2011. It contains direct references to different
clauses of ÖNORM B 1600 (“Barrier free buildings – Design Guideline”). In Germany, we find a similar
approach. The new accessibility standards DIN 18040-1 for public buildings and DIN 18040-2 for
dwellings have now been finalized and published, but they have not yet been implemented in the
respective building legislation in any of the 16 federal states. Now a long period of discussions and
negotiation is going to start within the federal countries if, how much and what of the new DIN
standards is going to be included in their building.
These finding clearly show that an equal approach on accessibility should be implemented in all
European MS.
3.3.4.2 Implementation
Generally, there is an approach to build new buildings accessible in most of the countries. There
seems to be no legislated procedure for public procurement concerning accessibility in nearly every
country.
Belgium, Malta and Poland provide positive examples. In Belgium, public buildings have to be
accessible to get a building licence. In Malta, clauses or conditions regarding accessibility are
generally included in public procurement documents. The Polish City of Gdynia was one of the
partners in the Build for All programme completed in 2006. Concerning the procedure of approving
the specific design phases in the light of accessibility in Poland there is a similar procedure within the
- 29 -
process of obtaining the building permit. The Building Design has to be verified and stamped by the
specialist on Safety and Work Hygiene (BHP), which is supposed an expert on accessibility, i.e. he or
she has to know the regulations within this area. Then the public buildings and some dwelling houses
are turned when built it after the approval procedures done by all kinds of experts, safety expert
among them.
The absence of this kind of quality assessment procedures and inspection systems regarding
accessibility during the process of execution and at its end, is an issue many of the rapporteurs
complain about. The analysis clearly shows a lack of accurate implementation of accessibility of the
built environment in practice because of a lack of information as well as negative attitudes towards
accessibility issues among all of the people involved in the process of procurement, execution and
authorisation.
comprehensively covered partly covered not covered

17
16 16
14
Number of countries
11
10
9
8
7 7 7
5
4 4 4
3 3 3
2 2 2
1
0 0
Wheelchair walking dexterity vision hearing cognitive allergies age/stature
Figure 4 - Coverage of user needs in European countries

The analysis shows, that the coverage of user needs by regulations, standards and guidelines in
European MS strongly focuses on certain user groups i.e. wheelchair users, people with walking
difficulties and people with visual impairments/blind people. This indicates a disadvantage for other
user groups such as people with allergies, people with intellectual/cognitive/mental impairments,
people with diversities in age and status, people with reduced manual dexterity/arm
function/strength and people with hearing impairments/deaf people.
3.3.4.3 Conclusion about national country reports
Good practice examples
As the analysis clearly shows, awareness and education regarding the implementation of accessibility
of the built environment in Europe requires improvement. Good practice examples show attempts of
doing so through different approaches. There are well-elaborated and detailed guidelines and
standards in most of the countries. To meet the requirements in practice, education/training and
sensitisation among authorities, planners and craftspeople as well as among consumers/users of the
built environment are essential.
There are some good examples for a certain educational approach within universities etc. (see
Annex J.2).
- 30 -
Financial support for refurbishment to improve accessibility (e.g. Belgium: Flemish adjustment
support; Denmark: government fund for improvement in access to buildings with public service
functions; Finland: Housing Finance and Development Centre of Finland (ARA) supporting lifts in old
multi-storey dwellings; Germany: government-owned bank “Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW)”
supporting modernisation work in existing housing etc.); Financial support and funding for new social
housing projects and in three countries also for single family houses if accessibility is incorporated
according the adaptable housing concept (e.g. in Austria in all federal countries).
Award schemes (e.g. Austria: award for good practices of accessible building sites every two years;
Finland: yearly award by architects’ and designers’ “Armi Association” and Finnish Association of
People with Physical Disabilities; Hungary: “Accessible Building of the Year”; Ireland: “Excellence
through accessibility Awards”, “O2 Ability Awards”, “ABLE Business Excellence Award”, “RIAI/OPW
Accessibility Award”; Portugal: annual award by the National Rehabilitation Institute (INR) for
research on disability related issues , annual award for accessible housing by the National Institute
for Housing and Urban Rehabilitation, annual award for accessible architecture by the Santa Casa da
Misericordia in co-operation with the National Institute of Architects etc.) and information for
professionals as well as for consumers provided by several organisations (e.g. Austria: “design for
all”, Belgium: “Enter vzw” etc.) should help to encourage the implementation of accessibility
requirements.
In order to gain public attention and awareness, implementation on a large scale in public urban
environment, for instance, are of great impact (e.g. Austria: project “Accessible village/city for all
users”; Cyprus: new design concerning pedestrian pavements covering requirements for wheelchair
users and blind people; Greece: accessible pedestrian route connecting the archaeological sites in the
centre of Athens, Acropolis accessible for wheelchair users, public transport fully accessible; Austria:
accessible prefabricated house at “Blue Lagoon” public transport fully accessible, pedestrian routes
and crossings accessible also for blind people, tourism accessibility checks introduced by the
chamber of commercial affairs/tourism and the ministry of tourism, accessibility checks for shops,
medical centreetc.)
3.3.5 Inventory of updated summary of CEBC “access for all” report
Report from the Consortium of European Building Control CEBC “Access For All” in Europe,
December 2007– updated 2011 with available data
Some data have been updated and improved due to changes in building regulations. During the
public consultation period all country data will be updated.
These tables provide a good overview about the application of building regulations concerning
accessibility within non-domestic/commercial buildings and within dwellings in the different
countries.
Excerpt from the study:
Although access to the built environment is essentially a Member State responsibility, the Commission
2003 Communication on ‘Establishing equal opportunities for people with disabilities: A European
Action Plan’ committed itself to take into account the recommendations made in 2003 by the group
of independent experts on accessibility to the built environment and expressed in the report called
‘2010: a Europe for All’.
Most Member States have regulatory and/or technical standards and conformity assessment
schemes or audit trails to assess accessibility of buildings, which are also used in public procurement.
Whilst many standards, building codes and other means are based on work in ISO and guidance given
by CEN, the different national approaches are not harmonised and this could influence the acceptance
or otherwise of designs and products, whilst at the same time not influencing the level of accessibility
in a building.
- 31 -
The study has shown that the principles of the legislation vary very little in their requirements and this
is somewhat unexpected. However it is gratifying to know that there is a commonality of purpose
running through the legislative requirements and associated guidance. The problems of access for
disabled people will in fact be the same in whichever country they live and work.
The tables included later in this report set out the main requirements of each country’s legislation,
usually building regulations, and the guidance issued setting out how to meet those requirements.
In some countries which have separate states or provinces, the legislation differs slightly, and where
this is the case the table shows an indicative form of the requirements or a common theme.
Findings
The responses in this publication are from the 25 member countries of CEBC, which includes Northern
Ireland and Scotland separately, as their building regulations differ in some respects from England
and Wales. Austria, Belgium and Germany’s responses are a common denominator of their
legislation, as there are a number of provinces or Länder in these countries.
Perhaps surprisingly in some respects, but very gratifying in others, was to learn that the
requirements for disabled access are very similar, if not the same in many countries in Europe. Almost
invariably the minimum size of a passenger lift is 1.1m x 1.4m and for nondomestic buildings in all
countries without exception, access is covered from the site boundary, the approach to the building,
entry into the building and in the building itself. As far as dwellings are concerned only Croatia and
Estonia do not control the approach to the building for disabled access purposes.
In the case of a requirement for automatic doors at the entrance to buildings, only Belgium and
Croatia stipulate the provision of this facility. The most varied requirements that the questionnaire
revealed were those in respect of facilities for disabilities other than physical ones, as can be seen by
the responses in respect of hearing and sight impairments. An interesting variance is the one
concerned with the number of storeys where a passenger lift becomes mandatory. Where it is
mandatory, the majority fall into the category of three, four or five storey.
Conclusions
Although the prime mover for this study was to look at access for the disabled, it should be
remembered that good access for the disabled results in good access for everyone, including
particularly, parents with children in pushchairs and prams as well as the ambulant disabled and the
elderly.
- 32 -
Table 4 - Non-domestic/commercial buildings, CEBC report – access for all in Europe – updated 2011
CzechRepublic
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Netherlands
UK & Wales
Switzerland
Lithuania
Germany
Denmark
Non-domestic/commercial
Romania
Scotland
Portugal
Hungary
Slovenia
Slovakia
Bulgaria
Belgium
Sweden
Norway
Finland
Estonia
Croatia
Iceland
Austria
Ireland
Ireland
Greece
Poland
Cyprus
France
Latvia
Malta
Spain
Italy
i i
Legislation/ regulations supported by guidance notes? y n y n n y y n n n y y y y y y n n y y y y n y y y
Disabled access covered by legislation? y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
Disabled access a Building Regulation matter? y n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
Regulations performance based? p n y p y y y y p y y y y y y y y y y y y y n y y y
Regulation applies to non-dwellings? y n n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
Regulations apply to extensions as well as new buildings? y n n y n y y y y y n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
Regulations apply to the approach to the building? y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y p y y y y y y y
Maximum gradients to external ramps specified? n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
Regulations apply to external stairways? n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y n y y y y y y y y
Regulations apply to minimum width of entrance doors? n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
Regulations control visibility of large glazed areas? n y y n y n y n n y y y n y y y y n y y y y n y y y
Regulations control widths of corridors and hallways? n y y y y y y n n y y y y y y y y y y y n y y n y y
Regulations control internal door widths? n y y n y y y n n y y y y y y y y n y y y y y y y y
Regulations control the gradient of internal ramps? y y y n y y y n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
Regulations control internal stairs? y y y y y y y y y y n y y y y y y n y y y y y y y y
- 33 -
Table 4 - Non-domestic/commercial buildings, CEBC report – access for all in Europe – updated 2011 (continued)
Czech Republic
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Netherlands
UK & Wales
Non domestic/commercial
Switerland
Lithuania
Germany
Denmark
Romania
Scotland
Portugal
Hungary
Slovenia
Slovakia
Bulgaria
Belgium
Sweden
Norway
Finland
Estonia
Croatia
Iceland
Austria
Ireland
Ireland
Greece
Poland
Cyprus
France
Latvia
Malta
Spain
Italy
3 5 3 2 2 2 4 5 3 3 2
Are passenger lifts required by the Regulations? y y y n y y y n y y p y y y y y y n n y y y y y y y
E 2
Platform lifts and stair lifts be considered as an alternative? y y y n y n y n y n n y y y y y y n y n y y y y y y
2
Regulations require toilets for the disabled? y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y n y y y y y y y y y
2
Regulations control the colour/contrast of internal surfaces? y n y n n n y y n y y y n n y y y n y y n y n y n y
Regulations stipulate automatic doors at entrances? p y y n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n
Reception areas and lobbies controlled by Regulations? y y y y y y y n p y y y n n y y y n y y y y n y y n
Regulations require low level counters etc at reception areas? n y y n y n y n y y y y n n y y y n y n n y n y y n
Are induction loops required for the deaf p n y n y n y n y y n y n n y n n y y n y y y y n
Are wayfinding signs required? y n y n y n y y y y y y n n y y y n y y n n y y y y
Is artificial lighting controlled by the Regulations? y n y n p n y y n y y y y n y y n n n y y n n y y y
Is means of escape in case of fire for disabled people controlled? y n y n y p n n n y n p n y n n n n n y n n n y y n
Are building management action plans accepted with trade off

y n y n y n y y n y n n n y y n n n y y n y n y n n
for alarms, refuges etc?
2345
y yes , , , etc. minimum number of storeys
E
n no existing buildings only
i
p partly included in Building Regulations
- 34 -
Table 5 - Dwellings – CEBC Building report - access for all in Europe – updated 2011
England & Wales
Northern Ireland
Czech Republic
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Switzerland
Dwellings
Lithuania
Germany
Denmark
Romania
Scotland
Portugal
Hungary
Slovenia
Slovakia
Bulgaria
Belgium
Sweden
Norway
Finland
Estonia
Croatia
Iceland
Austria
Ireland
Greece
Poland
Cyprus
France
Latvia
Malta
Spain
Italy
i
Legislation/ regulations supported by guidance notes? y n y n n y y n n n y y y y y y n n y y y y n y y i y
y
Disabled access covered? y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
Disabled access a Building Regulation matter? y n y y y y y n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
Regulations performance based? y n y y y y y n p y y y y y y y y y y y y y n y y y y
Regulation applies to dwellings? y y n y y y y n y y y y y y y y n y y y y y y y y y y
Regulations apply to existing as well as new buildings? y y n y y y y y y y n n y n y y y n y y y y y y y y y
Regulations apply to the approach to the building? y y n y y y y n y y y p y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
Maximum gradients to external ramps specified? y y n y y y y n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
Regulations apply to external stairways? y y n y y y y n y y y n y y n y y n y y y y y y y n y
Regulations apply to minimum width of entrance doors? y y n y y y y n y y y p y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
Regulations control visibility of large glazed areas? y y n n n n n n n y y n n n y y y n y y y y n y y y y
Regulations control widths of corridors and hallways? y y n y y y y n y y y n y y y p y y y y y y n n y y y
Regulations control internal door widths? y y n n y y y n y y y n y y y y y n y n y y n y y y y
Regulations control the gradient of internal ramps? y y n n y y y n p y y n y n y y y y y y y y y n y y y
- 35 -
Table 5 - Dwellings – CEBC Building report - access for allEurope – updated 2011 (continued)
England & Wales
Northern Ireland
Czech Republic
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Switzerland
Dwellings
Lithuania
Germany
Denmark
Romania
Scotland
Portugal
Hungary
Slovenia
Slovakia
Bulgaria
Belgium
Sweden
Norway
Finland
Estonia
Croatia
Iceland
Austria
Ireland
Greece
Poland
Cyprus
France
Latvia
Malta
Spain
Italy
Regulations control internal stairs? y y n y y y y n y y n y y n y y y n y y y y y y y y y
3
3 5 3 3 3 6 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 y
Are passenger lifts required? y y n n y y n n y y y y y n y p y n n y y y y y y y
E
Platform lifts and stair lifts be considered as an alternative? y y n n y n n n y n n n y n y n y n n n n n y y y y y
4
Toilets for the disabled? y y n y y n y n y y y n y y y n n y y y y y y y y y y
Regulations control the colour /contrast of internal surfaces? y n n n n n n n n n y n n n y y y n n y n n y y n n y
- 36 -
3.3.6 Analysis of Gaps (Overview)

Background
The information used to develop this overview derives from a review of the standards, regulations
and guidance available in around 54 countries or semi-autonomous regions across the EU and EFTA
and several international countries including Australia, Canada and the US. An assessment was also
made of ISO/FDIS 21542
This has generated a considerable amount of data relating to both the provision and scope of
information available to designers, building owners and users on developing accessible, inclusive
buildings and spaces. It has also identified areas where a good level of guidance exists and,
importantly, where there are gaps in standards, regulations or general guidance.
Recording the availability of information was undertaken by considering a broad range of issues that
affect the accessibility of an environment or space. This was then used to identify whether the issue
was covered in the standards, regulations and other guidance available within each country or
region. An assessment was also made of the general scope of the information identified in terms of
its overall coverage of the issue. The information was gathered by Project Team members and a
number of volunteers identified by the Team.
Establishing a classification system
The scope of coverage of the information contained in the various published documents available in
the non-EU countries, EU Member States and semi-autonomous regions considered in the study was
recorded using the following three main classifications:
Comprehensive coverage (c)
Partial coverage (p); and
Not covered (n)
A further classification of (n/a) was used to identify those areas for which no information was
available r identified by the Project Teams and volunteers.
On the tables contained in Annex F, (c) is denoted in green, (p) in yellow and (n) in red, (n/a) is
shown in purple.
Details of the classification system adopted
The study has identified that there are a considerable number of published regulations, standards
and other good practice guidance available across EU Member States. Indeed for some design issues
such as the provision of the environment for people with mobility impairments for example steps
and stairs, ramps and external circulation routes, there appears to be an oversupply of information.
However, whilst the documents within each country may be comprehensive and be classified as such
(c), in most cases the regulations, standards and guidance given for that country also accommodates
and reflects local or cultural expectations which may be different to other EU member States. Such
differences should always be tolerated, even encouraged, rather than subdued.
Whilst the classification of (c) identifies, for example, that comprehensive information is available
within a particular country for designers and others to use in the creation of accessible buildings and
spaces, it does not mean that the information contained in the document is necessarily suitable or
could be considered applicable to all EU Member States.
Therefore it would not be appropriate to simply take one regulation, standard or guidance source
that has been designated as having a comprehensive coverage and adopt it or consider it as being
suitable for an EU wide standard. Indeed, given the cultural and legislative differences that exist
between EU Member States and in semi-autonomous regions within those countries, such an
outcome would not be possible in a project of this time-frame.
- 37 -
The classification exercise undertaken has achieved is the identification of where guidance of various
levels of is available in order to inform and influence the process of developing an EU wide
accessibility standard.
Similarly the classification of partial coverage (p) indicates that whilst some information is available it
is not comprehensive in its coverage and some gaps exist in the information given.
What is of significant relevance perhaps is how the system adopted has identified those areas where
gaps clearly exist in the regulations and standards and where no guidance exists to inform the design
and management process.
This is important in the development of a future EU wide standard because whilst the information
identified as being comprehensive (c) or partial (p) may be influenced by cultural and legislative
issues within individual countries, that is not so for the areas where a complete lack of information
has been identified.
That means that any future work done to create standards or guidance in these areas can be done
with an EU wide applicability as one of the main objectives. The issues for which no guidance is
currently available are shown with the notation (n).
An overview analysis of the findings
An overview analysis of what is covered by the those Regulations and Standards shows that for the
physical features, building use classes and other characteristics considered in the study, all the issues
necessary to create an accessible built environment are covered somewhere in regulations,
standards and guidance across the non-EU Countries and Member Statesexamined.
3.3.6.1 Statutory Regulations
In terms of the statutory requirements associated with the needs of people with physical and/or
mobility impairments there is a considerable amount of comprehensive information available in all
countries and areas considered in the study.
With the exception of the Netherlands, all EU Member States have comprehensive information
available for the provision of access routes and approaches, and the provision of gradients and
ramps, external steps and stairs, and handrails both when approaching a building and when moving
about internally.
Details on the provision of suitable circulation routes and manoeuvring spaces internally are also very
well covered across the countries considered although there are a few EU Member States, which
have only partial coverage.
In line with the general trend towards concentrating on information that addresses the design needs
of people with mobility impairments, coverage on the provision of wheelchair accessible toilets and
showers is very good throughout EU Member States. There are though less examples of
comprehensive coverage of providing toilet and shower facilities for ambulant disabled people and
much less for those addressing the needs of children.
With the exception of the above the coverage of available information and guidance is inconsistent
across all other access issues that were considered.
Very high returns for no coverage where noticed on several important issues for accessibility
including the provision of external lifts, internal and external surface finishes, drop off/pick up points,
seating and rest areas, facilities for guide dogs, external and internal lighting, external and internal
signage, the provision of travelators, escalators, windows, switches and controls, acoustics, and
emergency egress.
Important areas such as accessible first aid facilities and refuse systems and were not covered in any
of the countries or areas considered in the study and other important areas such as the provision of
furnishings and acoustics were also very sparsely covered.
- 38 -
It is clear when considering the gaps in coverage that the majority of the areas which are covered
more comprehensively within the statutory documents are those relate more to addressing the
needs experienced by people with physical and mobility impairments when using the built
environment. Important areas for other user groups, although also important to people with mobility
impairments, such as environmental factors (colour, lighting and acoustics), communications systems
(signage and enhanced hearing equipment), and indoor air quality are less well covered, which is so a
common picture in regulations across all EU Member States.
The study also considered the provision of regulations with regard to building according to class type
or use.
For transport facilities there is little coverage on accessibility in relation to the provision of facilities
associated with the use of taxis, buses and airports. There is also very little information relating to
the use of parking controls and across all countries considered there is no regulation at all on the
accessibility of facilities associated with cycling.
Across other class types and uses there such as hotel, residential, healthcare, leisure, retail, banks
etc, the amount of guidance within the regulations on the providing accessible buildings and places is
inconsistent, but generally poor across all countries considered. Guidance within the regulations on
the provision of accessible gas and petrol stations, listed and historic environments, and rural
environments is very poor.
3.3.6.2 National accessibility standards
Only eight European countries – Austria, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Slovenia, United Kingdom,
Norway and Switzerland – have accessibility standards implemented. Depending on the
implementation within building regulation or other legislation the importance of the respective
standards for planning, public procurement and execution of works is very different. The accessibility
standard of Denmark is not referenced in any legislation and therefore of minor importance
concerning practical implementation in the built environment.
In contrary, the Austrian accessibility standard has high importance and influence within Austria due
to its clear reference in the harmonised building regulation document – OIB Guideline 4 “Safety in
use and accessibility” which is implemented in seven regional building regulations of seven federal
countries. In addition to this concept the so called “state of the art” approach on standardisation
gives clear guidance to architects and public procurers to implement all technical requirements in
their planning to be on the ‘save side’ if later any complaints are raised. Due to the authorized status
of architects in Austria it is even more recommendable to follow the “shall” requirements in the
standard. This is an additional obligation for architects and civil engineers in Austria and comes from
the previous history of their professional status that are acting in their whole professional business
under oath as an authorized expert and have to follow all legislation issues very strictly. In all
contracts and tenders one clause about the “state of the art” concept is included which obliges all
parties to follow the standards in each relevant technical field.
In all countries with federal structure we found out that often an unequal approach concerning the
level of implementation of accessibility requirements exists although the accessibility standards are
implemented on the market – but with much lower importance than all building regulation
requirements.We found out that Switzerland and Germany both have their different regional
countries, cantons or even communities a very different approach on accessibility which cannot be
described easily even by experts. It is always a matter of negotiation in each building project about
the amount of requirements on accessibility.
Within the UK, different regulations on accessibility apply in England and Wales, Northern Ireland,
and Scotland. Wales will shortly be assuming control of its own building regulations, so there may
well be four different regulation documents applicable to the UK.
- 39 -
Currently England and Wales, and Northern Ireland have separate and identifiable building
regulations related to accessibility whereas Scotland includes accessibility requirements within its
general building standards for domestic and non-domestic buildings.Norway has an interesting
advanced standard on Universal Design.
3.3.6.3 Implementation of accessibility requirements within CEN Standardardisation
CEN/CENELEC Guide 6 gives guidance on accessibility and ‘factors to consider’ with functional
requirements but is not very well known within CEN/TCs. Some years ago ANEC started a
questionnaire among CEN/TCs about knowledge and use of Guide 6. The result was rather
disappointing that less than 5% even know the Guide 6 and less are applaying it in their
standardization development.l
One of the main reasons why Guide 6 has no importance is the previous lack in Construction Product
Directive which has been changed in the new Construction Product Regulation. Accessibibility was
missing in the essential requirement 4 “Safety in use”. Therefore no further requirements on
accessibility was included in the Interpretative document and no procedure was established due to
legal requirments. In other areas of the previous six essential characteristics the CEN Consultant
plays an important rule in standards development. Without his approval no standard can be
proceeded to enquiry. The CEN Consultant checks if all requirements of the different Directives have
been respected in the draft of the standard.
The PT A leader has elaborated a report on the implementation of accessibility within CEN/TCs based
on the CEN/CENELEC Guide 6 requirements. This study was prepared for ANEC in 2004 and could be
used as basis for further updating research. In this study the relevant CEN/TCs are listed and
combined with the specific ‘factors to consider’ based on Guide 6. Further proposals are provided on
how these problem could be solved. A short overview is included below in recommendations.
The experts recommend to ask CEN for further guidance in this matter. Due to the new Construction
Products Regulation (CPR) with inclusion of accessibility to the basic requirement No.4 the approach
within European standardization will be changed. More information about recent development will
be included after the Open Meeting in cooperation with EC DG ENTR and CEN.
Recommendations
All relevant CEN/TCs should be invited by CEN to explain and confirm how they include necessary
accessibility requirements within their published standards and in the development of new standards
before enquiry. This could also be done by a CEN Consultant on accessibility issues similar than on
other essential characteristics and Directives (Lift Directive, Machinery Directive etc.). If support is
needed an accessibility consultant could provide further guidance. As in the environmental field a
“help desk” could be established within CEN with a pool of accessibility consultants with expertise in
different areas. All convenors and secretariats should attend a seminar/workshop where basic
information on accessibility issues is provided and responsibility is strengthen on this essential
characteristic.
At the moment it is not quite clear how the Interpretative Document Nr. 4 will be revised to include
accessibility accordingly. This should be the basis for further checks. The new accessibility standards -
functional and technical – could provide further guidance for all relevant design and product
CEN/TCs.
Another point is the application of the Vienna Agreement which could be used to implement the
finalized ISO 21542 as a technical report or technical specification within CEN which has no obligation
to withdraw existing national accessibility standards. In the meantime the work on a common
European accessibility standard can be started immediately based on ISO 21542 and incorporating
missing areas from other good reference documents.
- 40 -
3.3.6.4 Conclusions
Gaps exist in the information contained in regulations, standards and guidance across most individual
Member Countries. Whilst they were evident in some issues related to the provision of buildings and
spaces to meet the needs of people with physical or mobility impairments, in the main the greatest
and most obvious gaps were identified in the areas which mainly affect other user groups. These
were:
certain impairments, for example, mental health, learning disabilities, cognitive, allergies;
the use of the built environment by children and older people; and
The issues that affect the equality of use of the built environment for people relating to their
age, gender, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation and social grouping.
What is clear from the study is whilst some specifically targeted research projects are needed to
develop guidance on such gaps, generally sufficient guidance in EU and non-EU countries around the
world already exists to generate, if required, an EU wide guidance document.
3.4 Conclusions View, Findings and Recommendations
3.4.1 Overview
Terms such as ‘procurement’, inclusion’, ‘accessibility’ and ‘compliance’ are difficult to define
precisely, and they are often not fully understood by those responsible for managing or providing the
products or environments people use. They are also not readily understood by those administrating
and triggering the procurement process.
Indeed it was the occurrence of poor delivery of accessibility in publicly funded projects and the
reasons why this is occurring that was a major driver in instigating the work undertaken for this
project.
Explaining the importance of the above terms and the relationship between them can be difficult as
it will vary according to several influencing factors across EU Member States. These include culture,
legislation, the availability of guidance and regulation, how it is interpreted, and the expectation of
what is to be delivered.
The main thrust of the project was to address why projects relating to the built environment, and
especially ones procured through public funding, are being delivered without providing an
appropriate level of accessibility for the people who will use them, and especially disabled people.
The project involved an examination of the scope and detail of existing standards, regulations and
guidance and the identification of areas where no guidance or standards exist. It addressed how
conformity and adherence to standards and regulations is checked and the different types of control
systems in use in member states. The project outcome has been to make recommendations for
improvements in the delivery of accessible built environments for publicly funded projects.
The project has identified that there is a plethora of available guidance, legislation and enforcement
procedures currently available within Member States to ensure appropriate delivery. However,
whilst adequate regulations, standards and guidance exist, there are clear and influencing
shortcomings in:
the timing within the procurement process when accessibility and inclusion is identified and
introduced;
the importance, both real and perceived, that the procurement process places on the need
to provide appropriate levels of accessibility for any delivered project;
processes of ensuring conformity assessment;
procedures for enforcement, including financial and punitive penalties for non-compliance;
- 41 -
The level of training and knowledge of design professionals, controllers and procurers in
accessibility related issues; and
accreditation systems for access professionals.
Shortfalls in these issues are apparent across all EU Member States considered in the study.
3.4.2 Findings
The findings of the project can be summarised as follows:
3.4.2.1 Legislation, Regulations and Standards
The study has identified that there are many good national regulations, standards and guidance
documents available in EU Member States. In fact, if taken all together it appears there is almost an
oversupply of information. Some of the information available reflects local or cultural expectations
and requirements, which should always be tolerated, even encouraged, rather than subdued.
An overview study of the areas covered by the information available shows that for those physical
features, characteristics and use classes of the built environment selected for consideration, the
majority of issues that will need at some time to be considered in the delivery of an accessible built
environment are covered somewhere in the regulations, standards and guidance across the EU
Member States.
Whilst, there are some gaps in the published documents and some additional research and
preparation of guidance is necessary, there is also evidence to show that many of the gaps can be
filled by good guidance which is currently available in the non-EU Member States that were also
examined.
Whilst guidance sources such as ISO also reference associated documents, they do in themselves
contain basic good practice guidance within the main document to enable designers to make design
decisions without the need, and cost, of obtaining a number of additional publications.
Ensuring that designers and building managers can obtain clear general guidance easily in one
document, albeit supported by additional referenced sources where appropriate, must be
considered to be an important factor in deciding the adoption of any guidance that will operate EU
wide.
3.4.2.2 The Gaps
Through this study we have found there are both gaps and weaknesses in terms of actual coverage of
issues and elements in documents.
Gaps or weaknesses may be of three basic kinds:
Where a functional requirement for accessibility is missing from the guidance or
requirements, or is only partly considered;
Where there is no technical specification for a built element or building type, or where the
specification is incomplete or not well developed.
Where general principles are given with no firm guidance.
The analysis of documents from all countries has shown some countries have greater coverage of
access requirements and specifications than others. This is better understood in terms of variations
which relate to a range of different conditions, rather than being simply called “gaps”.
Gaps and weaknesses in national documents are found in relation to functional requirements and in
relation to technical specifications.
By definition, we can say that gaps and weaknesses in functional requirements arise because certain
user needs have not been considered.
- 42 -
Gaps in technical specifications can occur either because certain building types or environments are
not considered, or the specifications do not fully address the activities of the wide range of users
who will use the particular environment or part of the building in certain ways.
Across the information available in EU Member States the main gaps identified related to the:
coverage and existence of credible and useful regulations, standards and guidance for certain
impairments, for example, mental health, learning disabilities, cognitive, allergies;
use of the built environment by children and older people; and
any regulations are focused on the requirements for buildings, there are large gaps for
outdoor built environment
What is clear from the study is whilst some specifically targeted research projects are needed to
develop guidance on such gaps, generally sufficient guidance in EU and non-EU countries around the
world already exists to generate, if required, EU wide standards and guidance documents.
3.4.2.3 Signposting
The importance, advantages and requirement to consider accessibility and inclusion as part of the
procurement process is not signposted sufficiently within the processes adopted in most EU Member
States.
In addition, there is no clear signposting or indication of the principles by which the accessibility or
usability of a completed building or product can be measured or judged.
3.4.2.4 Conformity and Enforcement
The study has identified that scant regard is paid amongst many EU Member States to conformity
assessment and enforcement of legislation, regulation and guidance.
The reasons for this vary with influencing factors including:
how enforcement is controlled within individual countries; and
how its importance is perceived.
Variations in approach include those ranging from systems that are totally hands-off throughout the
development process once an initial permit to build has been obtained, to a lack of adequate
inspection and authorisation of completed works by compliance assessment bodies.
The delivery of an accessible built environment is often considered by those commissioning and
delivering buildings and spaces to be an issue that will inevitably incur additional costs. Whilst this is
an ill-informed and incorrect approach it is a very real one, and one that is often a much more
influential factor in deciding what will be provided than other issues such as enhanced benefits to
society.
In most situations, successful compliance with any regulation, standard and guidance will depend
upon enforcement and the level of expectation amongst those providing the built environment that
transgressions from the regulations will be robustly and effectively challenged.
It is clear from the study that the systems are generally not working in practice and there are clear
shortcomings in both of these areas.
However, in order to insist on or expect compliance it is also important to clearly set down or
‘signpost’ the required and expected parameters within the procurement and delivery process. The
study has identified that that is currently not the case.
The study has also identified that there is insufficient incentive (financial or punitive) for those
providing the built environment to meet the standards and guidance that already exist. Simply
introducing more regulations, mandates or directives or providing additional guidance documents
without also addressing the widespread inadequate and ineffective conformity assessment and
enforcement processes currently in place is unlikely to improve the situation.
- 43 -
Improved enforcement on its own is unlikely to have any real impact without also signalling at the
procurement stage a benchmark by which the acceptability of a delivery will be judged.
It is also clear from the study that the experience, qualifications and professional expertise in
accessibility and inclusion of those who are responsible for ensuring compliance or conformity with
regulations and standards varies considerably across EU Member States. In most cases training and
levels of experience in such issues is inadequate and contributes to the lack of actual accessibility of
the finished project.
A move by the EU to develop an EU wide ‘competent persons’ scheme similar to that currently found
in some Member States to establish and monitor professional standards for competence and
expertise amongst accessibility professionals could go some way to improving the delivery of
accessible built environments.
3.4.3 Recommendations
The study suggests it is possible to create a strategy and underlying ethos that will deliver built
environments that are both accessible and sustainable without creating additional financial or
bureaucratic burdens on public bodies or the public purse.
It also identifies that if inclusive design is considered as a fundamental and inherent part of the
procurement process clear opportunities exist to reduce overall expenditure by eliminating costly re-
work and the under-utilisation or inappropriate ordering of deliverables.
To achieve this, the study recommends that:
The EU should instigate the development of:
1. A strategy that will adopt principles of inclusive design and establish them as fundamental
deliverables of any procurement process for publicly funded projects;
2. Guidance to public procurers as to how to clearly identify the legal requirements for
equality and inclusion, how they should be addressed in developing accessible, inclusive
built environments, who should be involved in the process and who is responsible for
ensuring delivery;
3. Penalties, either financial or punitive, that can and should be used to address any failure to
deliver an appropriate level of accessibility for any publicly funded project;
4. An EU wide accreditation system for professionals involved in the delivery of accessible
built environments; and
5. A common EU Standard for Accessibility in the Built Environment for all EU Member States,
with basic functional requirements and technical specifications
3.4.4 Proposal and recommendations concerning Mandate 420 – Accessibility Statement
Our interpretation of the Mandate is that the objective is essentially to make the Procurer’s work
easier and to assist them in ensuring that accessibility and European Design for All standards will be
met in future projects addressing the built environment.
We propose that considering and delivering appropriate standards of accessibility should become a
fundamental and absolute requirement of the procurement process and in inviting tenders for built
environment projects.
The proposed procedure will complement and support the safe and sustainable use of buildings
and the built environment.
Secondly, we also propose the development of a set of accessibility related criteria for awarding the
contract and later for carrying out conformity assessment.
- 44 -
For design or design & construction projects, (Works: design & execution) consideration of
accessibility issues must be introduced into the procurement procedure. This can be done using an
Accessibility Statement (see below).
For construction only projects, accessibility requirements should have already been taken into
account in the design,at which time they should also have been described in an Accessibility
Statement(see below). This will then be implemented by the contractor.
We believe that those involved in procurement will have limited knowledge and experience of
accessibility and inclusion issues and, in our view, it is not necessary for them to be competent
persons in the subject.
However, to assist procurers in ensuring that accessibility and inclusion are both appropriately
planned for and actually delivered, we also propose that instructions and tools are prepared to
identify to them how that can be achieved.
The procurer will have the responsibility to include and require accessibility as part of the project.
The justification for this can be in national legislation that has to be followed and the European
Directives, which require accessibility. For example, building projects that are co-financed with EU
funds must be accessible for all.
In addition to the above Accessibility Statement we also recommend the introduction of an Access
Conformity Certificate (ACC) which would be issued at the end of a project providing all the elements
identified in the initial Accessibility Statement (see below) have been appropriately complied with or
addressed.
The person issuing the ACC could be the person who developed the initial Accessibility Statement or
an independent qualified access professional or competent person.
Being in receipt of an ACC should be a fundamental and absolute requirement for the issuing of any
permission from the building authority to occupy the building.
3.4.4.1 Contract Notice
In Section II, Object of the Contract, the notice shall include a description of any works/services in
which accessibility must be taken into account.
In Section IV, Procedure, for procedures based on the most economically advantageous tender,
- Part IV.2 Award Criteria shall include accessibility according to EU Standards as an award criterion,
with appropriate weighting.
Therefore, we propose that in relation to accessibility, the award criteria should be based on:
1. The tenderer’s accessibility knowledge/expertise,
2. The submission of an appropriate Accessibility Statement based on the EU Accessibility
Standards and reflecting the following two points of the Mandate:
a) fulfilment of functional requirements/ user groups covered, and
b) implementation of the EU Accessibility Standards in the technical solution
(- meeting the technical performance criteria for accessibility).
An Accessibility Statement is a tool that can be used to clearly identify how the consideration of
accessibility has or will inform and influence decisions taken in the design process.
It may be structured in a standard template to be used by all bidders. There may also be a general
part and a sub-section for specific issues depending on the nature of the project.
A qualified Access Advisor should be responsible for filling in and signing the Accessibility Statement.
- 45 -
The signed Accessibility Statement would be an obligatory document for any building project, which
receives EU funding and the Statement must be supplied by the tenderer when submitting a bid.
In procurement of design or design and build projects, the Accessibility Statement can be used as a
tool for evaluating competing bids. In the case of procurement of construction works it will be an
obligatory document, allowing the procurement to proceed correctly, but the Accessibility Statement
will not be used as an award criterion.
The Statement may further be used as a basis to help assess the conformity of the building after
completion.
The Statement has to “be signed off” and can then be used for conformity checking. But the
accessibility statement itself does not remain “live” as such. For conformity checking there may be
an additional document which describes the changes and decisions due to unforeseen situations. The
access advisor will check the conformity with reference to the access statement.
The Accessibility Statement is the basis for the Access Conformity Certificate (ACC) which is proposed
to be added as a third tool for final checking after completion of the works. The ACC will be
introduced to certify all accessibility measures based on the Access Statement and including all
unforeseen situations and changes during the building process and should be integral part of the
occupancy permit proceedings.
Who is the Access Advisor or Accessibility Expert?

The access advisor/expert has either
a recognised national qualification in accessibility of the built environment, or
proven high level experience in accessibility through completed projects or
taken the European Access Advisors’ Certificate (This could be proposed for development
in phase II of the Mandate, as a “support action”.
It is essential that access advisors have a recognised level of expertise in order to issue and sign a
[European] Accessibility Statement. We propose that the necessary procedures for this should be
developed in relation to phase II of the Mandate.
In Diagram 1. below, items that will be used as award criteria are shown with the symbol: [ % ]. The
weighting which is given to each item has not been specified but the Accessibility Statement should
be given the greatest importance.
- 46 -
Diagram 1 – Procurement – Accessibility Award Criteria
Procurement - Accessibility Award Criteria
1. Accessibility
knowledge of the Σ %
designer/team [%]
a. Functional requirements of specified

2. Accessibility user groups [%]
Statement [%]
Fulfilment of the EU Access b. Technical solutions meeting accessibility
Standards, based on (a) & (b).
performance criteria [%]
Conformity assessment
Access advisor
Access Conformity Certificate
(Proposed) Input for the Accessibility Statement template, covering (3b) in the above diagram.
Part of the Accessibility Statement will contain a table of references to the EU Standard, showing the
building functions and elements.
Table 6 – Proposed model for grading the achieved level of accessibility
for each element of a project
 
Meets the minimum EU Standard Exceeds the EU Standard
Elements:
Ramps
Doors
etc.
The EU Accessibility Standards could be graduated with “minimum” and “better” solutions, making it
easier to award points for good or better accessible designs.This will also make the EU Standards
more easily applicable to existing buildings. The EU Standards will indicate
 basic accessibility performance criteria, and
 a fixed range of “nice to have” performance criteria, indicatingbetter solutions.
3.4.4.2 Existing buildings
The Accessibility Statement can also be used for the adaptation or extension of existing buildings.
The template can be used for assessing design proposals and renovations to buildings or the built
environment.
For procurement of renovation of existing buildings/environments, the accessibility should be
addressed at the highest possible level.
3.4.4.3 Proposals for the Toolkit (to be developed in phase II of the Mandate)
The Toolkit will be used mainly by procurement officers but also designers and contractors. They will
be able to find the functional and technical specifications on the toolkit. These specifications may be
used as award criteria in the tenders, or in support of conformity processes.
- 47 -
Contents of Toolkit:
Short introduction with the philosophy of Design for All and description of the diverse user
groups,
National legislation referring to accessibility (based on the Inventory collected by Project
Team A, and continually updated),
EU Directives referring to accessibility of the built environment,
The two EU Accessibility Standards:
I. Standard functional requirements of specified user groups,
II. Standard of technical specifications to meet the functional requirements;
National /international accessibility guidelines in common use (based on the Inventory
collected by Project Team A, and continually updated),
National / International examples of Good Practice in Accessible Built Environment,
Template of the Accessibility Statement which responds to the EU Access Standards (I and II)
– to be used as Award Criteria.
To make the Toolkit user-friendly, parts of the content, e.g. the Introduction, the Good Practices and
technical solutions, can be presented in an eLearning programme with text, videos, design drawings
and other illustrations.
3.5 Proposal for a standardization work programme
3.5.1 Functional requirements as the basis for planning and design of the built environment
Introduction
Buildings and the built environment must ensure the independence, comfort, health, safety and
equal participation of all users. Normally they will accommodate people in all stages of life, from
infancy to old age. People who use buildings and the built environment have different needs and
abilities. It is essential that designers and planners take into account the requirements of all users so
as to support their activities and functions.
Functional requirementsfor accessibility, as statements of the main demands for an accessible
environment, must address the needs which all people have in any given situation. A description of
the functional requirements of all users must be available at the planning stage of any built
environment, so that the facility will work successfully for everyone. Functional requirements must
also reflect the types of activities that the users wish to engage in. The design, construction and
management of the built environment are therefore a matter of direct concern to everyone.
Procurers of buildings and built infrastructure have a responsibility to ensure that environments are
suitable for supporting all users’ activities.
Over the past few decades, governments, public authorities, planners and designers have taken steps
to provide an accessible built environment by addressing the functional requirements of the wider
range of users, including persons with disabilities, and including such requirements in laws, standards
and guidelines.
In different EU Member States and regions, and in countries around the world, there is now a wide
range of documents containing functional requirements, some of which may be obligatory for
designers to use and others only advisory.
Although there is a growing common understanding of the needs of users and their functional
requirements regarding accessibility of the built environment, there are many different procedures
and approaches to delivering accessibility in the different countries and jurisdictions. Public
procurement officers throughout the European Union therefore have different approaches and tools
- 48 -
to address and to demand – or not to demand – accessibility. The implementation of accessibility and
the end result have often been considered unsatisfactory or even missing.
Mandate 420
According to the Mandate 420, the consideration of functional requirements in this study has two
objectives:
“First, defining a European standard at the level of common functional requirements for
accessibility in the built environment that can be used for public procurement….
Second defining European standard/Technical specifications that describe the technical details
to be able to fulfil the above mentioned functional accessibility requirements, for example, the
minimum adequate width of a door”.
To reach the first of these objectives, a work programme was carried out by the project team with
the following steps:
1. Inventory: An inventory of statutory documents, standards and guidelines on accessibility of
the built environment was developed, made up of over 300 publications from more than
20European and non-European countries. This work is presented in section(s) 3 and Annexes
F and G.
2. Inventory analysis: Documents in the inventory were analysed and classified according to
whether they contained functional requirements, technical specifications or both.
3. User Needs: A survey of EU member states was conducted using a standard table of user
needs which were answered by experts in accessibility of the built environment.
4. Identification of basic functional requirements: From the analysis of documents, and
experts’ knowledge and interpretation of the data, a set of main functional requirements for
accessibility was elaborated. These requirements are described and discussed in relation to
the context of developing an EU reference document, that will enable a common approach
to public procurement.
These analyses have enabled conclusions to be drawn, leading to proposals for the development of
an EU-level document containing common functional requirements for accessibility in the built
environment that can be used for public procurement.
The results of this work programme and proposals are presented below.
3.5.1.1 Inventory Analysis
Table 7 below shows the frequency of functional and technical requirements that are present in the
collected documents (all countries)
Table 7 – Technical and functional requirements in the collected documents
TYPE OF GENERAL TECHNICAL
BUILDING CODE STANDARD GUIDELINE
DOCUMENT LEGISLATION REGULATION
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
Type of
requirement or
guidance
Totals 74 39 40 36 58 58 52 74 126 125
The functional requirements are statements of the main demands for an accessible environment.
Documents in the inventory may include functional requirements, technical specifications or both.
- 49 -
In about 2/3 of the countries, functional requirements are stated in laws dealing with accessibility in
planning and design.
In building codes, technical regulations and guidelines, functional and technical requirements are
found in almost equal numbers of documents.
In Standards about 50% more documents refer to technical specifications than those documents that
refer to functional requirements.
3.5.1.2 Consideration of user needs in statutory and advisory documents
A table was produced in order to collect information from national rapporteurs in EU member states,
identifying which target groups (and thus their user needs) are covered in the legislation on
accessibility in each country.
Experts were asked to indicate which user needs are covered in the national legislation, standards or
other guidance documents. These answers indicated, for each country, whether coverage of the user
needs for each target group was covered, partly covered or not covered. This provided an overview
of the strengths, gaps and weaknesses in the coverage of different types of user needs in the EU
Member States.
Table 8 below shows the categories of users.
Table 8 – Table of User Needs
People with Intellectual / cognitive / mental impairments
People with diversities in age and stature
These broad categories of target groups were chosen, based on a review of user categories
frequently mentioned in the Inventory documents and the expert team’s knowledge of the field. The
list aims to cover the wider range of user needs related to accessibility and therefore it includes the
main types of functional impairments.
Although some people might argue that this classification is a product of a “medical“ model of
disability and therefore inappropriate, we believe that functional requirements for accessibility can
only be defined and addressed in the design process, once there is full recognition of the range of
abilities and limitations of disabled persons in any given environment. Designers need to have
knowledge and guidance about the range of challenges and possibilities which users have in the built
environment, and for this it is essential to specify the functional requirements of persons who have
different disabilities and bodily stature.
Within the category of “Diversities in age and stature”, older people and children are included, as
well as people who are very short or tall or obese. In particular, for older people, which is a growing
proportion of the population, their needs are also widely covered by the other categories, taking into
account the range of impairments they may acquire, (including motor functions – co-ordination,
balance, strength, stamina - sight, speech, hearing, understanding, etc…).
An overview of the target groups of users addressed in statutory and guidance documents, by
countries, is shown in table 9 below.
- 50 -
Table 9 - Coverage of User Needs in European and EFTA countries and International (including ISO/FDIS 21542, USA, Canada)
Inter-
EU countries EFTA
national
User Needs
United Kingdom
(indicated for each country with
ISO/FDIS 21542
Czech Republic
Liechtenstein
complete, partly or not covered: c/p/n and indicated
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Switzerland
ADA - USA
with colours green/ yellow/ red)
Lithuania
Germany
Denmark
Romania
CANADA
Portugal
Hungary
Slovenia
Slovakia
Bulgaria
Belgium
Sweden
Norway
Estonia
Finland
Austria
Ireland
Greece
Poland
Cyprus
France
Latvia
Malta
Spain
Italy
People using a wheelchair c c c c c c c c p c c c c c c c p c c c c p c c c c c c
People with walking difficulties c c c c c c c c p c c c c c p p c c c c p p c c c c c
People with reduced manual dexterity / arm function /
c p c c p p p n c c p c c n p c n c c p p c c p c c
strength
People with vision impairments / blind c p c c p c c c p c c c p c c c p c n c p p n c c c c c
People with Hearing impair-ments / deaf c p c c p p c p p c c p p c n c p c n c p n p p c p c c
People with Intellectual / cognitive / mental
c p c p p p p p n c n p n p p n p p n c n n p p c p c p
impairments
People with allergies p n c n p n n p n n n n n p n n n n n n n n n p p n c n
People with diversities in age and stature c p c c p c c p p p p c n p p n n n p n n p p c c c
- 51 -
The table above shows categories of users in the left-hand column and countries across the top.
Scores in the cells of the table indicate the degree of coverage of user needs for each EU and EEA
country, and USA and Canada, on each user category, based on statutory documents, standards and
guidelines. The key shows whether user needs are covered:
c = complete,
p = partly or
n = not covered
with corresponding colours: green/ yellow/ red.
The coverage of user needs in the ISO/FDIS 21542 document are shown, for comparison, since it is a
widely accepted document, internationally. Also, USA and Canada are shown because their
documents are also well-known and very detailed.
The results show that the best coverage of user needs in rank order is as follows:
Table 10 – Coverage of user needs in each target group
Coverage
Target groups / User Needs
c p n
1 People using a wheelchair 25 3 0
2 People with walking difficulties 22 5 0
3 People with vision impairments / blind 19 7 2
4 People with hearing impairments / deaf 13 11 3
5 People with reduced manual dexterity / arm function / strength 13 10 3
6 People with diversities in age and stature 9 11 6
7 People with intellectual / cognitive / mental impairments 6 15 7
8 People with allergies 2 6 20
Out of the 27 responding countries plus ISO/FDIS 21542, the target group with the best coverage is
“people using a wheelchair”, followed by people with walking difficulties and “vision impairments /
blind”.
“People with allergies” are covered least and also “people with intellectual / cognitive / mental
impairments” are less well considered.
Countries which address the needs of most target groups comprehensively are: Canada, Norway,
Austria and Switzerland.
ISO/FDIS 21542 is also comparable to Canada and Norway, with a comprehensive coverage of all
target groups except “people with allergies”. .
These results broadly confirm the experts’ impression that the main concern of laws, standards and
guidance for accessibility of the built environment focuses on wheelchair users and ‘persons with
reduced mobility’. This perception is also present in the population in general. The fact that many
disabilities and long-term health conditions are in “hidden” (from view) may contribute to a lack of
awareness of these issues by lawmakers and others who prepare design standards and guidance.
3.5.1.3 Identification of basic functional requirements
The Project team has examined current documents containing functional requirements for
accessibility in order to develop a framework for an EU reference document that will provide a
common approach to public procurement of accessible built environments.
- 52 -
3.5.1.4 Structure and content of the functional requirements

It has been mentioned above that functional requirements are organised and presented in different
ways in the documents studied. They vary according to:
the overall approach taken5
the scope of the requirements, (completeness of the functional requirements in
connection with the needs, activities and functions of users)
the method of presentation of requirements (in terms of linguistic style and design of
the content for ease-of-use by the designer).
the connection between functional requirements and technical specifications.
Therefore a proposal for a common approach is needed, building on “best practice” documents,
having a sound structure and integrating the best basic functional requirements.
Gaps and weaknesses
It was noted that are gaps and weak points in current documents and poorly served target groups,
which need to be addressed in the common document. These gaps are:
Functional requirements for people with allergies. It has been shown very few countries
address the target group of people with allergies. Consequently there are few examples of
functional requirements suitable for their needs. Requirements are considered necessary for
this category as the number of people with allergies is increasing rapidly due to a variety of
factors including pollution, indoor climate problems, etc. From the inventory, only 1
document has comprehensive coverage of indoor climate, 5 have partial coverage and the
rest of the countries gave no answer or answered “none”.
Functional requirements for people with cognitive / intellectual / mental impairments are
covered only partly or not at all in majority of countries studied. Requirements are
considered necessary for this category of users, also because they apply as well to increasing
numbers of older people with memory loss or dementia, visitors who do not speak the local
language, etc.
Functional requirements for children are very infrequent in statutory and guidance
documents. From the inventory only 6 documents have comprehensive coverage, 21 have
partial coverage and 28 have no requirements for children’s interior or exterior play areas. Of
course, there are some functional requirements related to needs of other target groups,
which can assist children’s access and use of the built environment, such as those for people
with walking difficulties, people with reduced manual dexterity, etc.
3.5.1.5 Additional parameters contributing to accessibility of the built environment
In addition to the gaps above, we have also identified other factors that are not widely addressed as
such, but which must be considered in design, due to the way human activities and life conditions are
rapidly changing.
Allergies are increasingly common, working life and conditions are changing, with the increased use
of new technologies and devices; large numbers of people are travelling, we live in increasingly
‘smart’ environments. In 2010, for the first time in history, more than 50% of the world population
lives in cities.
5
In some countries, the functional requirements are defined as 'basic actions'such as motion, grasp and manipulation,
location and communication – MGLC- (abbreviated as DALCOCriteria inSpanish),andsimilar criteriain Switzerland. Since the
approach of most countries is to define functional requirements in relation to ‘user needs’, we have chosen not to use
‘basic actions’ as the unit of our analysis or proposals.
- 53 -
With respect to these trends and challenges, we suggest it is necessary to include certain general
parameters in functional requirements that will contribute to and guarantee an improved accessible
environment for all. These parameters are:
Equitable access and use of the built environment by all persons
Health, safety in use of buildings, environments, equipment
Comfort in the built environment.
Equitable use implies that the functionalities to be included in an EU common reference document
must be addressed to all users, not only disabled users. By accommodating the needs of all disabled
users, then the needs of the whole population will also be covered.
We propose that the EU might require studies of safety and accessibility for all, for building projects,
(similar to an environmental study which places requirements on energy-saving, use of sustainable
materials, etc).
The concept of “Accessibility and safety in use” has already been introduced in the revised EC
“Construction Product Regulation” (89/106/EEC)”.
Comfort relates to the ease and enjoyment of environments and the limitation of unwanted noise,
pollutants, and other sources of disturbance. Limiting physical and emotional stress should be
important targets for an accessible environment.
It is likely that, by taking these three parameters into account, the economic viability of buildings and
other built environments will be increased, as will the well-being and security of the users.
Targets for a common EU document
The proposed functional requirements document should aim to establish:
1. A common language for the description, design and management of accessibility in the
built environment
2. A common set of requirements for planning and design
3. Functional requirements that are broadly based (inclusive of the widest range of user
needs ), both for economic and social reasons
3.5.1.6 Proposal for a unified EU document containing functional requirements
A unified EU document containing functional requirements is proposed, with a specific approach
suitable for design, procurement and management of accessible built environments and buildings.
The contents of the common document should include:
A user guide to the document
Scope and purpose
Terms and definitions
-------------
An introduction to accessibility
The list of target groups and user needs
The set of basic functional requirements for accessibility
Sub-sets of specific requirements contributing to each main functional requirement
A set of built environment elements
A list of building/environment types and their related built environment elements
References
- 54 -
(Accompanying documents / other formats)
Technical Specifications Manual

Examples of design solutions
Online Toolkit
The basic functional requirements should act as a “guide” which takes the designer or procurer to
the necessary solution (i.e. technical specifications) which is needed in relation to an element or set
of elements.
With the structure and contents outlined above, a “toolkit” can be designed (in accordance with
Mandate phase II) with a database and various workflows to allow different persons (roles) to
participate in the procurement and design process.
As stated earlier, the common document must address the needs of the main target groups.
3.5.1.7 Proposed main target groups:
Table 11 – Target groups with user needs

Target groups / User Needs
People with diversities in age
People with diversities in stature
People with learning difficulties / mental impairments
Within each of these target groups certain users are also covered, for example:
Table 12 – Target groups including other sub-groups
Target groups / User Needs Including sub-groups…
People using a wheelchair Parents with pushchairs
People carrying luggage
People using rollators
People with walking difficulties Pregnant women
Some older people
Children
People with vision impairments / blind Some older people
People with hearing impairments / deaf Some older people
People in noisy environments
People with reduced manual dexterity / arm Children
function / strength Some older people
People with long-term health conditions
People with diversities in age Children
Older people
- 55 -
People with diversities in stature People who are very short

Children
People who are very tall
People with obesity
People with learning difficulties / mental People who do not understand the local
impairments language
3.5.1.8 Proposed EN standard with basic functional requirements

The proposed basic functional requirements for the common EU document are shown below :
Proposed list of basic functional requirements
1. Equitable and safe use of outdoor areas

2. Equitable and safe approach to a building
3. Equitable and safe entry via the same entrances
4. Equitable and safe use of the same paths in horizontal circulation

5. Equitable and safe access to the same paths in vertical circulation
6. Equitable and safe use of the same rooms
7. Equitable and safe use of the same equipment and facilities
8. Equitable and safe use of toilet and sanitary facilities

9. Equitable and safe exit and evacuation routes, concepts for emergency planning
10. Equitable and safe communication and orientation via two or more senses*
11. Equitable and safe use of facilities and buildings for their intended purpose
12. Equitable and safe protection from environmental hazards, indoors and outdoors
* Provided through two or more senses, using auditory, visual or tactile means
It should be noted that the list of basic functional requirements addresses the major considerations
of access to and use of the built environment. Within each of these basic requirements, it is
proposed that sub-sets of specific requirements should be developed in connection with the use of
each area or element of a building / built environment. For example:
Equitable and safe use of outdoor areas
1.a. Equitable and safe in exterior pedestrian traffic routes
1.b. Equitable and safe, access and use in outdoor areas for rest and recreation
1.c. Equitable and safe access and use of pedestrian crossing points
….. etc.
Documents which have this type of structure, with detailed functional requirements are listed as
references, below. Examples of such documents include:
1. GUDC draft standard (which uses the term "strategies”)
2. ISO …- use clauses 3. ....etc.
- 56 -
It is important to note that functional requirements cannot stand by themselves as the only demands
(or advice) for design and procurement of buildings or environments which are to be accessible. It is
not advisable to give a unified list of functional requirements without specifying the set of built
environment elements which they relate to.
Furthermore there shall be an additional document with technical specifications which are intended
to support the functional requirements. Phase II of the mandate should include the development of
technical specifications, leading from the functional requirements.
3.5.1.9 Proposed EN standard with technical specifications for built environment elements
A proposed list of elements for the built environment is based on the list of ISO/FDIS 21542
elements.
Why we need to propose a unified document for the EU accessibility document (to be developed in
phase II ).
Through our analysis of a wide range of documents and country reports, it is clear that the same
issues are dealt with using similar approaches but there are different priorities, policies, terminology,
and ways of understanding and working. Also, experts from different countries and different
backgrounds view things differently. National Standards are not easily transferred to a pan-European
level and the way they address issues is unlikely to satisfy users from many countries and cultures or
EU public procurement – and EU policy in general – there is a need for a common basic reference
document which can contribute to a common understanding about the functional requirements and
specifications that are needed. Also, in a new document, as opposed to an existing national Standard,
certain (newer) issues can be introduced to support accessibility, such as safety in use and
sustainable development.
What we propose and which documents to build on:
First, we propose the functional requirements for accessibility to be presented as one ‘Standard’,
which procurers can use/refer to. This can be an independent document or the first part of a general
document which also contains technical specifications.
The functional requirements will be taken from the ISO document with some modifications.
The document will be supported by our tables and further analysis, as required, including the
functional requirements related to the user needs, and building elements.
We propose to use ISO as the basis for the EU document because:
It is providing requirements to create a sustainable built environment which is accessible for
all.
It is not a “national” document – with the ‘issues’ these can have, and
It has been so far accepted by many countries. Many MS have been involved in developing
this standard and have had opportunity to discuss and comment on the requirements. It also
means that the document is quite wellknown in many MS.
For the issues which ISO does not cover at all, (outdoor environments, etc.) we will propose one or
more documents which have been found to cover the elements adequately.
3.5.2 Proposal for an EN standard/Technical Specification describing all technical details based
on the functional accessibility requirements
In the overview table all aspects, building elements, facilities and building types are listed with ISO
21542 comprehensive, partlial or no coverage or if only coverage with other European national or
non-EU good reference standards.
This traffic light model - applied in the whole report - gives a clear picture about
- 57 -
the provisions that already exist in areas identified as "GREEN" as recommended by the
teams,
the provisions to be conspired to define the areas identified as "YELLOW",
a description of the expected content of the non yet existing provisions identified as "RED".
Table 13 – Coverage with ISO/FDIS 21542
c comprehensive
p partial
n not
Table 14 – Use of font colours in Table 15

ISO standards
Black
Building aspects, building elements, building uses …
Clear Red comprehensive coverage by EN standard
Brown comprehensive coverage by any national European standard
Blue comprehensive coverage by non-EU country standard
Table 15 – Proposals for an EN standard/Technical Specification for phase II
CEN 207 document proposals Referenced Documents/Guidance1
External Environments and Approaches

to Buildings
Access Routes and Approaches ISO 21542
Gradients and Ramps ISO 21542
Steps and Stairs ISO 21542
Handrails ISO 21542
External Lifts ISO 21542, EN 81-70,
Surface Finishes ISO 21542, CSA B651, BS 8300
Crossing Points, Tactile Paving, and Dropped Kerbs ISO 21542, RACyL D217/2001, CSA B651
Drop Off/Pick Up Zones ISO 21542, BS 8300, CSA B651
Car parking ISO 21542
Obstacles on a path and Street Furniture ISO 21542
Seating and rest areas ISO 21542
Facilities for Guide Dogs ISO 21542
Signage and Wayfinding (external - audible) ISO 21542, BS 8300
Signage and Wayfinding (external - tactile) ISO 23599
Signage and Wayfinding (external - visual) ISO 21542
Lighting (external) BS 8300, CSA B651
Internal Environments Internal Environments
Entrances ISO 21542

Reception Areas, counters, desks and ticket offices ISO 21542
Security Provisions CSA B651
- 58 -
Storage Facilities BS 8300, CSA B651

Circulation Routes ISO 21542
Manoeuvring space requirements ISO 21542
Lobbies ISO 21542
Internal Doors ISO 21542
Windows ISO 21542
Passenger Lifts ISO 21542
Passenger Lifts for existing buildings ISO 21542, EN 81-70, EN 81-82
Platform Lifts / Lifting Platforms ISO 21542, EN 81-40
Stairs ISO 21542
Ramps ISO 21542
Escalators ISO 21542
Travelators ISO 21542
Handrails ISO 21542
Sanitary facilities for ambulant disabled people ISO 21542
(Toilets/Showers/Changing)
Sanitary facilities for wheelchair users ISO 21542
Sanitary facilities for other users – e.g. Children, ISO 21542
enlarged WCs, etc. (Toilets/Showers/Changing)
First Aid Facilities ÖNORM B 1602, CSA B651
Surface Finishes ISO 21542, CSA B651, BS 8300, RACyL D217/2001
Glazing and Manifestations/markings ISO 21542
Colour Contrasts ISO 21542
Signage and wayfinding (interior – audible) ISO 21542, BS 8300, RACyL D217/2001
Signage and wayfinding (interior – visual) ISO 21542
Signage and wayfinding (interior – tactile) ISO 21542
Lighting (interior) ISO 21542 maintained? 1, BS 8300, CSA B651
Acoustics ISO 21542, BS 8300, RACyL D217/2001
Audible Communication Systems ISO 21542, CSA B651, RACyL D217/2001
Switches, Outlets and controls ISO 21542
Emergency Egress Requirements ISO 21542
Refuse systems ISO 21542, DIN 18040-2:2011-XX, CSA B651
Furnishing (seating, desks, etc) ISO 21542
Indoor climate ÖNORM B 1600? To be determined 1
Transport Facilities Transport Facilities
Bus Facilities BS 8300 plus additional UK documents, RACyL

D217/2001, CSA B651
Rail Facilities EN TSI-PRM
Taxi Facilities ISO 21542, BS 8300, RACyL D217/2001, CSA B651
Airport Facilities RACyL D217/2001
- 59 -
Car Parking (including number, dimensions and ISO 21542

access)
Parking Control ISO 21542, RACyL D217/2001, CSA B651
Cycle Parking CSA B651, DIN 32984:2000-05;
Draft DIN 32984:2010-02
Specific Building Uses Specific Building Uses
Office, Conference and Meeting Areas ISO 21542, BS 8300, CSA B651
Kitchen/Refreshment (including bars, pubs and ISO 21542, BS 8300, CSA B651
restaurants, tea points and vending machines)
Hotels, student accommodation, etc ISO 21542, RACyL D217/2001, 2010 ADA, CSA
B651
Residential ISO 21542, RACyL D217/2001, DIN 18040-2, CSA
B651,
Sport ISO 21542, RACyL D217/2001, BS 8300, CSA B651
Auditoriums, concert halls and similar ISO 21542, BS 8300
Education BS 8300 suggested 1, RACyL D217/2001, CSA B651
Healthcare To be determined 1, RACyL D217/2001, CSA B651
Library BS 8300 suggested 1, RACyL D217/2001, CSA B651
Leisure Attractions/Entertainment 2010 ADA, RACyL D217/2001, CSA B651
Retail 2010 ADA to be considered 1, RACyL D217/2001,
CSA B651
Industrial BS 8300, RACyL D217/2001, CSA B651
Shared space RACyL D217/2001, CSA B651
Public Plaza RACyL D217/2001, CSA B651
Waterfront Environments (beaches, paths, cabins) RAA D293/2009, CTE/AutonomyDec
Child Play Areas (interior and Exterior) 2010 ADA 1, CSA B651
Judicial Facilities, Detention Facilities or 2010 ADA 1, RACyL D217/2001
Correctional Facilities
Bank, Post Offices, ATM‘s ISO 21542, BS 8300
Laboratories BS 8300, ÖNORM B 1602
Gas/Petrol Stations BGR 181
Religious BS 8300, RACyL D217/2001
Listed/Historic Buildings INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE
Rural Environments RACyL D217/2001, to be determined
Ports to be selected , 2010 ADA (partly covers ports) 1
NOTE 1 : When double checking and comparing document excerpts in phase II, it is possible that the
recommended reference documents for some elements or building uses my be changed. In some cases
ISO 21542 may be maintained as thte most appropriate source of guidance, while other reference
documents may be added or removed, depending on the in-depth analysis.
- 60 -
3.5.3 Proposed documents for phase II: References to the explicit details in ISO 21542 and other
guidance documents
In table 16 below the references to the explicit details in ISO 21542 and to the characteristics of the
additional guidance are presented. Texts are not provided in full due to copyright and lengths of texts
but all references to the different numbers of relevant paragraphs.
Additionally the traffic-light model has been applied for each building element or building uses:
comprehensive coverage within ISO 21542 is indicated with GREEN
partial coverage with ISO 21542 is indicated with YELLOW
where no coverage exists in ISO, the field is indicated with RED
Table 16 - Overview of “Proposed Documents” for phase II with references to explicit details in
ISO 21542 and other guidance documents
References to the explicit details in

Documents proposal
Built environment element ISO 21542 and other guidance
for phase II
documents1
External Environments and
External Environments and Approaches to Buildings
Approaches to Buildings
Access Routes and Approaches ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 5, 5.1, 7.1-7.7,
Gradients and Ramps ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 8, 9
Steps and Stairs ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 7.8 – 7.11
Handrails ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 7.12
External Lifts ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 6.8.3
Surface Finishes ISO 21542, CSA B651, BS ISO 21542: 6.6, 6.7, 7.1, 7.2
8300 CSA B651: Annex D: Potential for slip on
floor and tread finishes. BS 8300:
9.1.Surface finishes, 9.1.1. Visual
characteristics, 9.1.2. Materials and
acoustic design, 9.1.3. Floor surfaces,
9.1.4. Wall surfaces, 9.1.5. Glazed walls
and screens
Crossing Points, Tactile Paving, ISO 21542, RACyL ISO 21542: 6.7, 8.2, 7.3, 7.13
and Dropped Kerbs D217/2001 RACyL D217/2001: Article 23. Pedestrian
kerb cuts, Article 24. Pedestrian
crossings, Article 25. Crossings for entry
and exit of vehicles, Article 26.
Pedestrian flyovers, Article 27.
Underpasses for pedestrians, Article 34.
Protection and signaling works and
scaffolding use in public spaces,
Drop Off/Pick Up Zones ISO 21542, BS 8300 ISO 21542: 6.4
To be determined in phase II
Car parking ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.5
Obstacles on a path and Street ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 7.14
Furniture
Seating and rest areas ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 21.3, 23.1,
- 61 -

Documents proposal
for phase II
documents1
Facilities for Guide Dogs ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 30
Signage and Wayfinding ISO 21542, BS 8300 ISO 21542: 7.2, 40

(external - audible) To be determined in phase II
Signage and Wayfinding ISO 23599 ISO 21542: 6.5, 6.8.2, 40, Annex A
(external - tactile) ISO 23599: whole standard
Signage and Wayfinding ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 6.5, 6.8.2, 40, Annex A
(external - visual)
Lighting (external) ISO 21542, BS 8300, CSA ISO 21542: 33, 35
B651
Internal Environments Internal Environments Internal Environments
Entrances ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 10

Reception Areas, counters, ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 19, 36,8,
desks and ticket offices
Security Provisions CSA B651 To be determined in phase II
Storage Facilities ISO 21542, BS 8300 ISO 21542: 29
BS 8300: 10.1 Storage facilities, 10.1.1
Provision of storage facilities, 10.1.2
Access to storage facilities, 10.1.4
Fittings for storage facilities, 10.1.5
Visibility of storage facilities, 12.1.4
Storage units accessible to wheelchair
users, 12.8.7.2 Wardrobes and storage
systems
Circulation Routes ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 11, Annex C
Manoeuvring space ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 11.3, 11.4
requirements
Lobbies ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 10.8
Internal Doors ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 18 – 18.2
Windows ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 18.3
Passenger Lifts ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 15
Passenger Lifts for existing ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 15
buildings
Platform Lifts / Lifting ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 16
Platforms
Stairs ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 13
Ramps ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 8
Escalators ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 17
Travelators ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 17
Handrails ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 14, 8.5
Sanitary facilities for ambulant ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 26.2
disabled people
- 62 -

Documents proposal
for phase II
documents1
Sanitary facilities for ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 26.3-26.13
wheelchair users
Sanitary facilities for other ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 26.6, 26.16-26.18
users - e.g. Children, enlarged
WCs, etc.
First Aid Facilities ÖNORM B 1602 To be determined in phase II
Surface Finishes ISO 21542, CSA B651, BS ISO 21542: 31
8300 CSA B651: Annex D: Potential for slip on
floor and tread finishes. BS 8300:
9.1.Surface finishes, 9.1.1. Visual
characteristics, 9.1.2. Materials and
acoustic design, 9.1.3. Floor surfaces,
9.1.4. Wall surfaces, 9.1.5. Glazed walls
and screens
Glazing and ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 18.1.5, 18.1.6
Manifestations/markings
Colour Contrasts ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 15.4.4, 17, 18.1.1, 18.1.7,
18.1.5, 35, 36,5
Signage and wayfinding ISO 21542, BS 8300 ISO 21542: 30.2, 32, 39, 40
(interior - audible) To be determined in phase II
Signage and wayfinding ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 6.8.2, 30,2, 36.5, 39, 40, 41
(interior - visual)
Signage and wayfinding ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 30.2, 36.5, 39, 40, 41
(interior - tactile)
Lighting (interior) ISO 21542 maintained? ISO 21542: 19.5, 33, 38.3.2,
Acoustics ISO 21542, BS 8300 ISO 21542: 32
To be determined in Phase II
Audible Communication ISO 21542, CSA B651 ISO 21542: 21.1, 32.3, 39.3
Systems To be determined in phase II
Switches, Outlets and controls ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 36
Emergency Egress ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 34, 38
Requirements
Refuse systems ISO 21542, DIN 18040- ISO 21542: 36.11
2:2011-XX To be determined in phase II
Furnishing (seating, desks, etc) ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 37
Indoor climate To be determined To be determined in phase II
Transport Facilities Transport Facilities Transport Facilities
Bus Facilities BS 8300 plus referenced UK To be determined in phase II
documents
Rail Facilities EN TSI-PRM All TSI requirements and standards to be
referenced.
Taxi Facilities ISO 21542, BS 8300 ISO 21542: 5.1
BS 8300: 4.1 Designated on-street
parking, 4.5 Setting-down and picking-up
points, 13.3.3. Shops, supermarkerkets
- 63 -

Documents proposal
for phase II
documents1
and shopping malls: 13.3.3.2 Arrival
Airport Facilities RACyL D217/2001 RACyL D217/2001: Article 37. Airports,

heliports and stations for public
transport of travellers: 1. access, 2.
rooms and facilities and 3. platforms
Car Parking (including ISO 21542 ISO 21542: 6
number, dimensions and To be determined in phase II
access)
Parking Control ISO 21542, RACyL ISO 21542: 6.9
D217/2001 To be determined in phase II
Cycle Parking DIN 32984:2000-05; To be determined in phase II
Draft DIN 32984:2010-02
Specific Building Uses Specific Building Uses Specific Building Uses

Office, Conference and ISO 21542, BS 8300 ISO 21542: 19.5, 20, 22
Meeting Areas To be determined in phase II
Kitchen/Refreshment ISO 21542, BS 8300 ISO 21542: 24, 28, 29
(including bars, pubs and To be determined in phase II
restaurants, tea points and
vending machines)
Hotels, student ISO 2154, 2010 ADA ISO 21542: 26, 27
accommodation, etc To be determined in phase II
Residential ISO 21542, CSA B651 ISO 21542: 26
Sport ISO 21542, BS 8300 ISO 21542: 21, 26
BS 8300: 13.7. Sports related builings,
13.7.1. General, 13.7.2. access for
disabled spectators, 13.7.3. Access for
disabled people who are participants or
competitors in sports events, 13.7.4
Swimming polls
Auditoriums, concert halls and ISO 21542, BS 8300 ISO 21542: 21, 23, 33.8
similar BS 8300: 11.3 Audience seating, 11.3.1
Provision of wheelchair spaces in
audience seating, 11.3.2 Access to
audience seating, 11.3.3 Visual clarity
and orientation, 11.4 Lecture and
conference facilities, 11.4.2 Access to
lecture and conference facilities, 11.4.3
Design for raked floors, 11.4.4 Sight
lines, 11.4.5 Types of seating in lecture
and conference facilities, 11.4.6 Ancillary
equipment in lecture and conference
facilities
Education BS 8300 suggested BS 8300: 11.4 Lecture and conference
facilities, 11.4.1 Provision of wheelchair
spaces in lecture and conference
facilities, 11.4.2 Access to lecture and
- 64 -

Documents proposal
for phase II
documents1
conference facilities, 11.4.3 Design for
raked floors, 11.4.4 Sight lines, 11.4.5
Types of seating in lecture and
conference facilities, 11.4.6 Ancillary
equipment in lecture and conference
facilities, 11.4.7 Study spaces, 11.4.8
Reading distance and size of lettering,
11.4.9 Visual clarity and orientation,
11.4.10 Acoustics, 13.9. Educational,
cultural and scientific buildings, 13.9.1.
General, 13.9.2. Accessible routes and
spaces
Healthcare To be determined To be determined in phase II
Library BS 8300 suggested BS 8300: 11.1 Counters and reception
desks, 13.9.4 Reading and studying in
libraries
Leisure 2010 ADA 2010 ADA: 206.2.9 and 234 Amusement
Attractions/Entertainment Rides, 206.2.10 and 235 Recreational
Boating Facilities, 206.2.14 and 237
Fishing Piers and Platforms, 206.2.11
Bowling Lanes., 206.2.13 and 236
Exercise Machines and Equipment,
206.2.15 and 238 Golf Facilities, 206.2.16
and 239 Miniature Golf Facilities
Retail 2010 ADA to be considered To be determined in phase II
Industrial BS 8300 BS 8300: 13.2 Industrial buildings, 13.2.1
General, 13.2.2 Access routes in
industrial buildings, 13.2.3 Toilet
accommodation, 13.2.4 Storage of
hazardous materials in industrial
buildings, 13.2.5 Equipment in industrial
buildings
Shared space RACyL D217/2001 To be determined in phase II
Public Plaza RACyL D217/2001 To be determined in phase II
Waterfront Environments RAA D293/2009 To be determined in phase II
(beaches, paths, cabins)
Child Play Areas (interior and 2010 ADA, Network Info 2010 ADA: 240 Play Areas, 240.1
Exterior) Child Playgrounds General, 240.1.1 Additions, 240.2 Play
Components
Judicial Facilities, Detention 2010 ADA 2010 ADA : 203.7 Detention and
Facilities or Correctional Correctional Facilities, 232 Detention
Facilities Facilities and Correctional Facilities, 808
Courtrooms, 808.4 Judges' Benches and
Courtroom Stations, 807 Holding Cells
and Housing Cells, 807.2 Cells with
Mobility Features, 807.3 Cells with
Communication Features
Bank, Post Offices, ATM's ISO 21542, BS 8300 ISO 21542: 19, 36.8
- 65 -

Documents proposal
for phase II
documents1
Laboratories BS 8300 BS 8300: To be determined in phase II
Gas/Petrol Stations BGR 181 BGR 181: To be determined in Phase II
Religious BS 8300 BS 8300: 13.8 Religious buildings and
crematoria, 13.8.1 General, 13.8.2 Places
of worship, 13.8.3 Crematoria and
cemetery chapels
Listed/Historic Buildings International Building Code International Building Code: To be
determined in phase II
Rural Environments To be determined To be determined in phase II
Ports 2010 ADA partly covers 2010 ADA : 235 and 1003 Recreational
ports Boating Facilities, 235.2 Boat Slips, 235.3
Boarding Piers at Boat Launch Ramps
NOTE 1: Due to time constraints and some translation requirements the list of reference clauses is not
complete. This work will continue during the public consultation period and a revised version will be
presented at the Open Meeting.
All documents from table 15 and 16 are listed below in table 17 with full title and number:
Table 17 – All listed documents in tables 15 and 16 with number and title
Indication Title of standard / regulation
ISO 21542 Accessibility and usability of the built environment
ISO
ISO/DIS 23599 Assistive products for blind and vision impaired persons -- Tactile
walking surface indicators
EN 81-40 Stairlifts and inclined lifting platforms intended for persons with
impaired mobility
EN 81-41 Safety rules for the construction and installation of lifts — Special lifts for
EN Standards / EU Regulations
the transport of persons and goods — Part 41: Vertical lifting platforms
intended for use by persons with impaired mobility
EN 81-70 Safety rules for the construction and installation of lifts – Particular
applications for passenger and good passenger lifts Part 70 - Accessibility
to liftsfor persons including persons with disability
EN 81-82 Improvement of the accessibility of existing lifts for persons including
persons with disability
EN 115-1 Safety of escalators and moving walks - Part 1: Construction and
installation
EN TSI-PRM Technical specification for interoperability for Persons with Reduced
Mobility
BS 8300 Design of buildings and their approaches to meet the needs of
European MS
disabled people – Code of practice

Regulations
Standards /
CTE/AutonomyDec Código Técnico de la Edificación
DIN 32984:2010-02 Ground surface indicators in public traffic areas
- 66 -
Indication Title of standard / regulation

DIN 18040-2 Construction of accessible buildings - Design principles - Part 2: Dwellings
ÖNORM B 1600 Barrier-free construction - Design principles
RAA D293/2009 Reglamento que regula las normas para la accesibilidad en las
infraestructuras, el urbanismo, laedificación y el transporte en Andalucía
RACyL D217/2001 Reglamento de Accesibilidad y Supresión de Barreras en Castilla y León
BGR 181 Fußböden in Arbeitsräumen und Arbeitsbereichen mit Rutschgefahr
ADA 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design
Intenrational
CSA B651 Canadian Standards Association - CSA B651 Accessibility of the Built
Environment Standard
INTBUILDING International Building Code
CODE
3.5.3.1 Final conclusions for the EN standardisation programme on accessibility

The referenced documents above, built up on ISO/FDIS 21542 requirements are proposed as a
baseline structure for the technical requirements for the future European standard/Technical
Specification/Technical Report on accessibility of the built environment which describe the range of
minimum technical details to comply with the functional requirements.
Generally ISO/FDIS 21542 covers most of the building elements comprehensively which are relevant
for basic accessibility requirements in the built environment. It has to be considered that the
difference between comprehensive and partial coverage with ISO 21542 is not so high and it is
sometimes a question of personal interpretation if comprehensive or partial coverage has been
chosen in the questionnaire.
3.5.3.1.1 Comprehensive coverage of building elements by ISO 21542
External environment:
o Access Routes and Approaches
o Gradients and Ramps
o Steps and Stairs
o Handrails
o Car parking
o Obstacles on a path and Street Furniture
o Seating and rest areas
o Facilities for Guide Dogs
o Signage and Wayfinding (external - visual)
Internal environment
o Entrances
o Circulation Routes
o Maneuvering space requirements
o Lobbies
o Internal Doors
o Windows
o Passenger Lifts
o Stairs
- 67 -
o Ramps
o Escalators
o Moving Walks
o Handrails
o Sanitary facilities for ambulant disabled people (Toilets/Showers/Changing)
o Sanitary facilities for wheelchair users (Toilets/Showers/Changing)
o Sanitary facilities for other users - e.g. Children, enlarged WCs, etc. (Toilets/Showers/Changing)
o Glazing and Manifestations/markings
o Signage and wayfinding (interior - visual)
o Switches, Outlets and controls
o Emergency Egress Requirements
o Furnishing (seating, desks etc.)
Different building uses:

o Office, Conferences and Meeting areas
3.5.3.1.2 Partial coverage of building elements by ISO 21542

For building elements where partlial coverage has been indicated several “good documents” have
been referred to in the tables above. These documents can provide further guidance for completion
of the requirements within ISO 21542.
These are the building elements where some improvements could be made on the basis of other
“good documents” referred in the tables above.
External environment with partial coverage:
o External lifts
o Surface Finishes
o Crossing Points, Tactile Paving and Dropped Kerbs
o Drop Off/Pick Up Zones
o Signage and Wayfinding (external – tactile)
o Lighting (external)
Internal environment:
o Security Provisions
o Storage Facilities
o Passenger lifts for existing buildings
o Platform lifts/Lifting platforms
o Surface finishes
o Signage and wayfinding (interior - audible)
o Lighting (interior)
o Acoustics
o Audible Communication Systems
o Indoor climate
Traffic facilities
o Car Parking
o Parking Control
o Rail Facilities
Different building uses:
o Kitchen, refreshment
o Hotel, student accommodation
o Sport
o Auditorium, concert halls etc.
o Education
- 68 -
o Healthcare
o Library
o Retail
o Industrial
o Shared spaces
o Judicial Facilities, Detention Facilities
o Bank, Post Offices, ATMs
o Laboratories
o Gas-/Petrolstations
o Listed/Historic buildings
We had several discussions in Team A about the fact if all these different building uses are really
necessary. What kind of additional specific provisions are requested if all general requirements on
accessibility based on ISO 21542 are fulfilled? In phase II of the Mandate 420 this could be further
developed.
3.5.3.1.3 Non-coverage of requirements by ISO 21542
Non-coverage of requirements by ISO 21542 lead to the recommendation of existing national
standards from European Member states and/or other non-EU standards as “good documents”
(ref.doc.). Only for ports no existing document could be found.
Building elements (external and internal environment):
o Signage and Wayfinding (external audible) – ref. doc. BS 8300
o First Aid facilities – ref. doc. CSA B651
o Refuse system – ref. doc. DIN 18040-2 and/or CSA B651
Traffic facilities:
o Bus – ref.doc: RACyL D217/2001 and/or CSA B651
o Taxi – ref.doc: RACyL D217/2001 and/or CSA B651
o Airport – ref.doc: RACyL D217/2001 and/or CSA B651)
o Cycle parking – ref.doc.: DIN 32984, and/or CSA B651)
Specific building uses:

o Residential – ref. doc. RACyL D217/2001 and/or CSA B651
o Leisure attraction – ref. doc. RACyL D217/2001 and/or CSA B651
o Public Plaza – ref. doc. RACyL D217/2001 and/or CSA B651
o Waterfront environment (e.g. beaches) – ref. doc. RAA D293/2009 and/or CTE/AutonomyDec
o Child play areas – ref. doc. CSA B651
o Religious – ref. doc. RACyL D217/2001
o Rural areas – ref. doc. RACyL D217/2001
o Ports (Marine) – no reference document available
Conclusions
With these recommended reference documents plus ISO 21542 a complete framework of existing
standards for accessibility requirements in the built environment can provide clear short term
guidance and is also the basis for the future standards development programme within CEN.
In phase II of the Mandate 420 a final list of all necessary building elements, facilities and building
uses should be further developed. .
- 69 -
4 Team B – Analysis of existing conformity assessment schemes of the buildings and

products meeting accessibility requirements for the built environment
4.1 General consideration
The built environment is not easily defined. In the context of this report the term is used to refer to
everything that is man-made that provides a setting for human activity, ranging in scale from
personal shelter to neighbourhoods to large scale civic surroundings. Built environment can include
everything from roads and transport infrastructure to pitches and arenas for sports and leisure
activities. As an activity it starts with the decision to build and it proceeds through many stages which
involve many players, processes and activities before finally reaching completion. Even following
completion the accessibility of the built environment is greatly influenced by how it is managed and
maintained.
Thus, the accessibility of the built environment cannot be assessed as a whole without paying
attention to each phase that defines it.
For this report we have grouped these phases under the following headings:
Inception
Design
Construction
Completion
Use & Maintenance
In each of these phases different participants perform the many activities necessary to obtain the
desired outcomes: defining the requirements, employing the service providers, conducting feasibility
studies, designing and detailing, obtaining statutory consents, tendering, monitoring, controlling,
constructing, handing over, using, managing and maintaining the end product. In order to assess how
and where accessibility requirements are best inputted and controlled to ensure a successful
outcome it is necessary to analyse in each phase how and where accessibility can be addressed and
what the most significant factors are.
The concepts for conformity assessment used in this analysis, as applied to the built environment,
are those provided by the ISO 17000 series of standards. It has to be mentioned that this series of
standards was developed for trade purposes to be used in the framework of the free trade
agreement. Experience with the application of such standards began more than 20 years ago with a
series of guides developed by CASCO which was initially a policy committee within ISO and not a
standardization one. The EU used these guides to support its new approach to permit the free
movement of goods within the European market. This subsequently became the EN 45000 standards
series.
Due to the growth of trade and the effectiveness of such documents in trading, ISO changed the
status of CASCO to a standardization committee and began the development of the ISO 17000 series.
The background to the concepts used in the analysis is given because these have to be adapted for
application to the built environment. Built environment is not a commodity that is traded or
developed as serial products are. Built environment is an outcome of a design that is unique, has a
life cycle of several decades and is used by people in every country.
In the framework of ISO 17000 series, the conformity assessment activities include testing,
certification, inspection and accreditation of conformity assessment bodies. According to ISO 17000,
conformity assessment activities can be performed by first party, second party and third party.
In the EU another type of conformity assessment is also used: project approval. This concept was
introduced by the New approach Directive and it is specifically for complex conformity modules.
Others Directive such TSI-PRM have also used modules to express the assessment of conformity but
in a different way than New Approach.
- 70 -
Internationally recognised practice has proven that certification and accreditation of conformity
assessment bodies are activities that can be performed only by third parties.
Certification is one of the conformity assessment elements that is relevant in the case of construction
products for those that are covered for the type 1, 1+, 2 and 2+. The construction products relevant
for accessibility in the built environment are not included in these modules. The majority of the
construction products relevant to accessibility in the built environment have to comply with module
4 and have to provide a declaration of conformity with essential requirements.
Another category of products incorporated in the built environment that requires certification
includes lifts/elevators. In their case, the existing directive includes, type tests and project approval
as well as certification and quality management.
A further third party conformity assessment is inspection and this is the most usual way to assess and
attest conformity in the building sector.
The first party activities of conformity assessment are the self declaration of conformity based on
internal controls of the business and on adequate checks and tests. In the case of the built
environment this kind of activity is performed particularly for the design/planning phase. It is also
increasingly used for the construction and completion phases where the costs associated with
effective third party certification and approvals have limited their application. For construction
products that are covered by former CPD, now CPR, self declaration of conformity will be used with
the new requirements which take effect from 1 July 2013.
Sometimes, for this type of conformity the term “self-certification” is incorrectly used. Any
certification that involves an attestation of conformity must be performed by independent persons in
order to assure the independence and impartiality of the process. In the case of first party
conformity assessment, those performing the assessment, issue also the attestation of conformity (in
this case a declaration) and they undertake the liabilities for their product.
The new approach directive was supported by a directive regarding manufacturer liabilities for
products put on the market. In 2010, CEBC – the Consortium of European Building Control issued a
report regarding the use of “self-certification” in the building sector which covered self declaration
throughout the whole construction process not only to the assessment of accessibility in the built
environment.
4.2 Conformity assessment fundamentals
4.2.1 Standards about conformity assessment
Products and services are mainly promises that are transformed into reality at the end of the
procurement and delivery process. Business customers, consumers, users and public officials have
expectations about products and services relating to features like quality, ecology, safety, economy,
reliability, compatibility, interoperability, efficiency and effectiveness. The process for demonstrating
that these features meet the requirements of standards, regulations and other specifications is called
conformity assessment. In brief, conformity assessment is the process used to ensure that products
and services deliver on their promises.
The World Trade Organisation Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (WTO/TBT Agreement) was
established to ensure that technical regulations and standards, and the procedures for assessing
conformity with them, do not create unnecessary obstacles to international trade. Successive
reviews of the TBT Agreement have noted the usefulness of ISO/IEC conformity assessment
standards and guides in harmonising conformity assessment practice and as benchmarks for the
technical competence of assessment bodies so that credibility and confidence in their results can be
obtained. ISO/IEC’s conformity assessment work therefore helps to overcome trade barriers.
Practitioners and users of conformity assessment from around the world have pooled their
knowledge and experience to produce a series of standards and guides setting out current best
- 71 -
practice. These standards and guides are produced through the ISO Committee on conformity
assessment, ISO/CASCO, and form what is known as the “CASCO toolbox”.
Table 18 – ISO 17000 seria
Subject Document Title

Vocabulary, principles Conformity assessment — Vocabulary and
and common general principles
elements of ISO/IEC 17000:2004
conformity
assessment
Code of good practice Conformity assessment — Code of good practice
for conformity ISO/IEC Guide 60:2004
assessment
Drafting normative Conformity assessment — Guidance for drafting
documents for use in normative documents suitable for use for
ISO/IEC 17007:2009
conformity conformity assessment
assessment
Testing/calibration General requirements for the competence of
ISO/IEC 17025:2005
testing and calibration laboratories
Conformity assessment — General requirements
ISO/IEC 17043:2010
for proficiency testing
Inspection General criteria for the operation of various
ISO/IEC 17020:1998 a
types of bodies performing inspection
Supplier's Declaration Conformity assessment — Supplier's declaration
ISO/IEC 17050-1:2004
of Conformity (SDoC) of conformity — Part 1: General requirements
Conformity assessment — Supplier's declaration
ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 of conformity — Part 2: Supporting
documentation
Product certification ISO/IEC Guide 23:1982 Methods of indicating conformity with standards
b for third-party certification systems
ISO/IEC Guide 28:2004 Conformity assessment — Guidance on a third-
b party certification system for products
Conformity assessment — Guidance on the use
ISO/IEC Guide 53:2005
of an organization's quality management system
b
in product certification
ISO/IEC Guide 65:1996 General requirements for bodies operating
b product certification systems
ISO/IEC Guide 67:2004 Conformity assessment — Fundamentals of
b product certification
Conformity assessment — Requirements for
Management system
ISO/IEC 17021:2006 bodies providing audit and certification of
certification
management systems
Certification of Conformity assessment — General requirements
ISO/IEC 17024:2003 b
persons for bodies operating certification of persons
Marks of conformity ISO Guide 27:1983 b Guidelines for corrective action to be taken by a
- 72 -
Subject Document Title

certification body in the event of misuse of its
mark of conformity
Conformity assessment — General requirements
ISO/IEC 17030:2003
for third-party marks of conformity
Accreditation Conformity assessment — General requirements
ISO/IEC 17011:2004 for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity
assessment bodies
Mutual Recognition Arrangements for the recognition and
ISO/IEC Guide 68:2002
Arrangements (MRAs) acceptance of conformity assessment results
Peer assessment Conformity assessment — General requirements
ISO/IEC 17040:2005 for peer assessment of conformity assessment
bodies and accreditation bodies
a Currently under revision.
4.2.2 Conformity assessment overview

Definition of conformity assessment
For the purpose of this project, the terminology of the standards listed in terminology section will be
used. It is, however, recognized that some of the terms are used in everyday language in a broader
sense and with a wider range of meanings. It is recognized that Member States may implement
conformity assessment standards in different ways but this will introduce market fragmentation. All
stakeholders will benefit from both harmonised technical requirements and harmonised means of
demonstrating conformance with those requirements.
The standard EN ISO/IEC 17000 defines conformity assessment as “a demonstration that specified
requirements relating to a product, process, system, person or body are fulfilled”.
The expression “object of conformity assessment” or “object” s used throughout EN ISO/IEC 17000 to
encompass any particular material, product (including service), installation, process, system, person
or body to which conformity assessment is applied. In the context of this report an object of
conformity assessment is typically a product.
In the case of the built environment, and for the purpose of the analysis of conformity schemes, the
objects of conformity are construction works and construction products used in building, public
spaces and shared areas, and transport infrastructure)
Typically, conformity assessment involves:
A set of specified requirements that are the reference for assessment
A procedure for assessing conformity against the requirements
An attestation that fulfillment of the requirements has been demonstrated.
In general, conformity implies that all requirements shall be fulfilled. Permissible exclusions are
defined in some specifications, e.g. certification against ISO 9001.
A conformity assessment system is a set of “rules, procedures and management for carrying out
conformity assessment”. A conformity assessment scheme is a “conformity assessment system
related to specified objects to which the same specified requirements, rules and procedures apply”.
This means that a conformity assessment scheme is the application of a conformity assessment
system to a specific situation in which the type of objects (products) and the requirements are always
- 73 -
the same. For instance, an example of a conformity assessment system would be third party
attestation (certification), whereas its application to libraries, based on library accessibility
guidelines, would be one of the available conformity assessment schemes.
Conformity assessments may be performed by different parties, as described in the following.
First party assessment
A first party assessment is a done by a supplier, manufacturer or service provider to attest the
fulfilment of specific requirements. The assessment is done by the supplier, manufacturer or service
provider based on first or third party services.
Second party assessment
A second party assessment is done by a second party, usually the buyer or user of the product.
Mostly, this term applies to a company controlling its subcontractors.
Third party assessment
ISO/IEC 17000 defines “third party conformity assessment activity” as “performed by a person or
body that is independent of the person or organization that provides the object and of user interests
in that object”. The third party conformity assessments are certification and inspection. The key
concepts of a third party assessment in the standards are “independent” and “impartial”. Relevant
standards are EN 45011 for UE, now under revision and transformation as ISO 17065 specifying
general requirements for bodies operating product certification systems and EN ISO/IEC 17020
specifying general criteria for bodies performing inspection. The difference between inspection and
certification is explained below.
Third party assessment is used by a manufacturer or service supplier to provide maximum confidence
in its products/processes
Assessment by accredited bodies
A conformity assessment body of any type (first, second and third) can apply for accreditation.
Accreditation is the procedure by which an authoritative body gives formal recognition that a body or
person is competent to carry out a specific conformity assessment. Conformity assessment bodies
seek accreditation when they need an independent third party to assess and declare their
competence. However, conformity assessment bodies may comply with the relevant requirements
without having to be accredited. The requirements for accreditation are stated in the respective
standards EN ISO/IEC 17020, EN ISO/IEC 17025 and EN 45011. These requirements are very detailed
and concern organization, competence, independence, impartiality and general principles for how to
carry out reliable conformity assessments.
4.2.3 Functional model of conformity assessment
EN ISO/IEC 17000 uses a functional model to illustrate how conformity assessment systems may be
set up. It is comprised of four functions: selection, determination, review and attestation, and
surveillance (Figure 5). Below is a short description of the four functions as they are presented in EN
ISO/IEC 17000.
- 74 -
Figure 5 - The functional model of conformity assessment (EN ISO/IEC 170000:2004)

The first function is selection, and it involves planning and preparing activities in order to collect or
produce all the information and input needed for the subsequent determination function. This
includes selecting the object of conformity assessment (sampling may be necessary to select a part of
the entire object that is representative of the whole), consideration of the specified requirements
and choice of the most appropriate procedures to be used for determination activities. Figure 5
represents all the information, samples (if sampling is used), decisions and other output from the
selection function as “information on selected items”.
The second function is determination. Determination includes the activities that are undertaken to
develop complete information regarding fulfilment of the specified requirements by the object of
conformity assessment or its sample. Some examples of determination activities are testing,
inspection, audit and peer assessment. Figure 5 represents all the output from the determination
function as “information on fulfilment of specified requirements”. The output is a combination of all
the information created by the determination activity, as well as all the input to the determination
function. The output is usually structured to facilitate review and attestation activities.
The third function is review and attestation. Review constitutes the final stage of checking before
taking the important decision as to whether or not the object of conformity assessment has been
reliably demonstrated to fulfil the specified requirements. Attestation is the conformity statement,
usually presented in a form that most readily reaches all of the potential users. Figure 5 represents
all the output from the review and attestation function as “fulfilment of specified requirements
demonstrated”.
The fourth function is surveillance. Conformity assessment can end when attestation is performed. In
some cases, however the assessment functions may need to be systematically iterated to maintain
the validity of the statement resulting from attestation. User needs drive such activities. For example,
an object of conformity assessment may change over time. This could affect its continuing fulfilment
of specified requirements. The activities undertaken in surveillance are planned in order to satisfy
the need to maintain the validity of an existing statement resulting from attestation. To satisfy this
need, a complete repeat of the initial assessment is not usually necessary in every iteration of the
surveillance. Thus, during surveillance, the activities in each function illustrated in Figure 5 may be
abridged, or different from, the activities undertaken in the initial assessment.
- 75 -
Selection: requirements
EN ISO/IEC 17000 defines a specified requirement as a “need or expectation that is stated”. Specified
requirements may be stated in normative documents such as regulations, standards and technical
specifications.
Determination
The determination can be carried out in many ways. ISO/IEC 17000 defines two types of activities
aimed at developing full information regarding the fulfilment of the specified requirements by the
object concerned: testing and inspection.
Testing is defined as the “determination of one or more characteristics of an object of conformity
assessment, according to a procedure”. The requirements given in EN ISO/IEC 17025 are applicable
to testing laboratories. When testing laboratories have (or need) to demonstrate their competence
to conduct specific tests and choose a third party accreditation body, the requirements of EN ISO/IEC
17025 are applying.
Inspection is defined as the “examination of a product design, product, process or installation and
determination of its conformity to specific requirements or, on the basis of professional judgment,
general requirements”. The requirements given in EN ISO/IEC 17020 are applicable to inspection
bodies. When inspection bodies have (or need) to demonstrate their competence to conduct
inspections and choose a third party accreditation body, the requirements of EN ISO/IEC 17020
apply.
Review and attestation: statements
After an assessment is finished, a review shall be carried out to check that all the activities involved
are suitable, adequate and effective. EN ISO/IEC 17050 recommends and EN 45011 obliges (clause
4.2(f)) the review to be carried out by person(s) other than those who made the determination.
Based on a decision following the review, a statement can be issued assuring that fulfilment of the
specified requirements has been demonstrated. EN ISO/IEC 17000 refers to this issued statement as
an attestation.
The attestation can be made by the supplier. In the context of conformity assessments, the
stakeholder that places the product onto the market is called the first party. Therefore, this is a first
party attestation, also called declaration. A customer or user, the second party, can also issue an
attestation. When an attesting person or organization is independent of both the supplier and the
customer, this person or organization is referred to as a third party. The manufacturer or service
provider is still responsible for conformance with requirements, even if a third party is involved in the
assessment.
These attestations are described in the following.
First party attestation
A first party attestation is a statement issued by a supplier or manufacturer, based on a decision
following review, that fulfillment of specific requirements has been demonstrated. The decision and
the review are made by the supplier or manufacturer. The supplier may refer to assessments, if any,
made by other first, second or third parties, but the supplier is entirely responsible for the
attestation.
Supplier’s declaration of conformity
A supplier’s declaration of conformity (SDoC) is a first party attestation with details compliant with
the standard EN ISO/IEC 17050. Part 1 of EN ISO/IEC 17050 contains general requirements. Part 2
specifies supporting documentation, i.e. information on how the attestation is carried out. Anyone
should be able to repeat the attestation and arrive at the same result using this information. A SDoC
may be based on first or third party determination.
- 76 -
Second party attestation

A second party declaration is an attestation of conformity issued by a second party, usually the buyer
or user of the product. Mostly, this term applies to a company controlling its subcontractors or a
large buyer or government agency carrying out the assessment itself.
Third party attestation
EN ISO/IEC 17000 defines certification as “third party attestation related to products, processes,
systems or persons”. A keyword here is “independent”. The standard defines “third party conformity
assessment activity” as “performed by a person or body that is independent of the person or
organization that provides the object and of user interests in that object”. Applicable standards that
include criteria for bodies that performed audits and certification are EN ISO/IEC 17021 for
management systems, ISO/IEC 17065 for products as well as ISO/IEC17020 for inspection. The
difference between the two is explained below.
Certification
Both EN ISO/IEC 17021 as well the future ISO/IEC 17065 specify general requirements for bodies
operating audits and certification of systems and products. A requirement is stated that a
certification body shall not supply or design products of the type it certifies, and not give advice or
provide consultancy services to the applicant (the party applying for a certificate) as to methods of
dealing with matters. These practices are contrary to the requirements of independence and would
be barriers to obtaining certification. In a certification process, the determination activities are
separate from review and attestation activities. Determination activities could be, in a certification
process, tests, project approval and/or auditing. Also, the certification process includes surveillance
during a certification period. These activities are described in the certification schemes. A
certification granted provides presumption of conformity with the reference for the whole
certification period which is normally 3 years.
Inspection
The ISO/IEC 17020 standard specifies general criteria for the operation of several types of bodies
performing inspection. The standard specifies general criteria for the competence of impartial bodies
performing inspection irrespective of the sector involved. It also specifies independence criteria. In
the case of inspection, the review and attestation activities are performed by the same persons that
performed the determination activities. In this case, the determination activity is inspection that
could involve measurement or assessment of the tests results. A report of inspection provides
presumption of conformity with the reference only for the products or for the works inspected.
Difference between inspection and certification
Generally, inspection involves direct determination of the conformity of unique —often complex or
critical— products or small series of products with specific or general requirements, whereas product
certification primarily involves determination of the conformance of products manufactured in long
series and for an interval, to specific requirements. While the inspection of products in use (in-service
inspection) is a well-established discipline, there is no such thing as certification (ISO/IEC Guide 65) of
products in use (from *IAF, 2004+). “Products in use” means individual instances of a product,
purchased and used by a customer.
The IAF/ILAC Guidance on the Application of ISO/IEC 17020 provides a clear description of the
differences between inspection (ISO/IEC 17020) and product certification (ISO/IEC Guide 65), as
shown in the table below.
- 77 -
Table 19 – Differences between inspection and product certification

Activity Inspection Product Certification
Inspection of individual products,
Certification of series of products
and not necessarily by third party
Nature of operation and always by third party (indirect
(direct determination of
determination of conformance)
conformance)
Examined against standards or
Assessed against standards or other
Conformity other normative documents and/or
normative documents
general requirements
Report provides condition at the Certification normally provides
Assurance
time of inspection continuing assurance of compliance
No need for separation of those Certification decisions taken by a
Decisions taking inspection decisions from different person(s) from those who
those performing inspection have carried out evaluation
Grants license to suppliers to issue
Issuing of licenses No licenses issued
certificate
Marks put only on products Marks may be put on a certified
Marking of products
covered by inspection product under license
Only where required in order to Normally necessary to provide
Surveillance
support inspection continuing assurance of compliance
In-service inspection
Always by inspection Not by product certification
of products
Accredited attestation
A conformity assessment body (testing laboratory, inspection or certification body) can apply for
accreditation to ask its competence recognition and thus produce accredited attestations.
An overview of conformity assessment activities and the responsibilities of the parties involved are
presented below:
Table 20 – Overview of conformity assessment activities
Party performing
conformity Functional approach
Surveillance (when
assessment
Document
system or
Determina
First party
needed) b
tion stage
attestatio
Selection
scheme
Review
Second
n stage
Result
party
party
stage
Third
and
Supplier's
declaration ISO/IEC
 - -    - Declaration
of 17050
conformity
Certification ISO/IEC
— —      Certificate
of products Guide 65
Certification
of ISO/IEC
managemen 17021
t systems
- 78 -
Party performing
conformity Functional approach
Surveillance (when
assessment
Document
system or
Determina
First party
needed) b
tion stage
attestatio
Selection
scheme
Review
Second
n stage
Result
party
party
stage
Third
and
Certification ISO/IEC
of persons 17024
Inspection ISO/IEC 
     — Report
17020
Testing /
calibration ISO/IEC 
     — Report
17025
a.At present, ISO and IEC do not have specific International Standards or Guides for second-party conformity
assessment systems. Second-party conformity assessment systems can be developed to rely on first-party
declarations, third-party attestations and certification, or second-party acceptance criteria.
b. Surveillance is part of the conformity assessment system and not an external market surveillance activity.
4.3 Identification and analysis of the accessibility assessment schemes within building control
schemes for building, public spaces and shared areas
The statistics on building control reveal that very few schemes are based on standards, the majority
only relating to regulations or guidance documents. From a standardization point of view the
situation points to
The need to develop schemes relating to standards. This is a very important issue in phase II,
if a new EN accessibility standard is to play a significant role at all.
The importance of EN standards in backing up regulations
A very important secondary conformity mechanism exists in several countries, namely when a
Disability Discrimination Act or similar is in place which urges building owners to comply with a
National accessibility standard. Characteristically, this type of conformity mechanism
Resides outside of normal control procedures and schemes,
Seems to be one of the most important factors for actually using standards in procurement
of buildings, new as well as existing ones.
It should be stressed, therefore, that
The importance of a full set of mechanisms, including a discrimination act or similar
legislation, should not be underestimated.
4.3.1 European experience and practices – EU member states and EFTA
In each European country a building control system is in place which assures the fulfillment of
essential requirements for buildings. Generally the essential requirements are broadly similar to CPD
and include:
Mechanical Resistance and Stability
Safety in case of Fire
Hygiene, Health and the Environment
Safety in Use (added ‘accessibility’ due to new CPR)
- 79 -
Protection against Noise

Energy Economy and Heat Retention
In some European countries where have been adopted acts regarding the accessibility of the persons
with disability or an anti-discrimination, the building control systems include requirements for
accessibility.
Depending on the country and system of control, accessibility may be included as part of theHygiene,
Health and the Environment requirement or as part of the safety in use requirement.
The actual analysis of the systems for accessibility assessment for building, public spaces and shared
areas is based both on the data received via checklists (16 EU MS and EFTA and 3 from Australia,
Canada and USA) and from data provided by CEBC 2007 study “Access for All in Europe”.
More than 65 assessment schemes were reported. The most frequently indicated were the
inspection schemes managed by the national building authorities.
4.3.1.1 Analysis based on types of conformity schemes
The conformity assessment schemes for which data was obtained have been categorized under the
types:
Building control authority scheme
Supplier self-declaration
Certification or accreditation of suppliers
Third party certification
Others, especially regarding a dedicated reference to accessibility requirements that are
included in standards or specification agreed to national level
Table 21 – Conformity assessment scheme types
Scheme type Building Supplier self- Certification or Third party Others
control declaration accreditation of certification
authority suppliers
scheme
Total 40 10 9 20 18
Data collected during M 420 phase I for the purpose of the analysis of the existing conformity
assessment schemes are presented in Annex H.1
Findings:.
Building control authority schemes dominate, using as reference accessibility requirements
included in laws and regulation
Third party certification is reported in only 7 countries (Belgium ( 8 schemes), Austria, Latvia,
Romania, Spain and UK (1), Denmark (2), Ireland (3))
First party conformity assessment schemes for accessibility exists in some countries (Belgium
(2), Ireland and Denmark (4)), due to legislation that in certain circumstances allows this kind
of assessment.
Only two schemes are reported to be based on standards. In the case of Austria certification
schemes exist for ONORM 16010, and in Spain a certification scheme exists for UNE 17001, a
standard for management of the accessibility within a company.
Countries like Belgium, Ireland, Netherland Spain and UK reported more than one inspection
schemes
- 80 -
The conformity schemes reported by Belgium cover different aspects of accessibility and are
based on their federal experience.
In the case of Romania and Latvia, certification schemes are reported for lifts. These also
exist in other countries but have not been reported.
Others accessibility schemes are reported as follow; Austria, Germany, Ireland and UK (1),
Greece (4) and Belgium (9).
The functional approach of conformity according to ISO 17000 includes the following phases:
1. Selection
2. Determination
3. Review and attestation
4. Surveillance
The involved parties in the conformity assessment scheme have to agree the reference and
appropriate guidelines for the process in the selection phase. Normally the owner and/or
administrator of the conformity assessment scheme develops the scheme based on an
international/European/recognized standard or regulation.
The second phase is determination where the activities are performed that allows assessment of the
object of conformity, in our situation: building, shared spaces and public area. In the case of building
control schemes, determination activity is inspection and this provides a greater presumption of
conformity than a self declaration. In the case of self declaration the credibility and expertise of the
person who issued the self declaration is extremely important: the owner, the developer or a
designated consultant on their behalf.
In both situations – building control scheme and self declaration - the training and education of the
person that performs both determination activities and attestations are paramount.
Another specific of the schemes used in the built environment is that the attestation is granted
almost forever. In fact, the outcome of the construction works has a life cycle of decades. Over the
lifespan of a building few surveillance activities are performed by Building Control Authorities and
those performed are mostly due to claims. A second approach to monitoring the accessibility
performance of buildings is the use of accessibility labels and/or the awards. These tools can
significant improve the level of awareness of accessibility requirements and they are very important
in the case of improving the accessibility of the existing buildings. The situation of accessibility labels
and award is presented in 4.3.2.
In the case of conformity assessment schemes of accessibility, team B has also considered that it is
useful to present an approach to the determination activities used during thefinal assessment
process based on the built environment elements as identified by team A. Normally, these kinds of
determination activities are performed at the end of the construction phase.
Table 22 – Relationship between built environment elements, parameter to assess
and determination activities in case of building completion
CEN 207 Inventory
Determination activities/
Built Environment Parameter to assess
device used
Elements
External Environments and Approaches to Buildings
Access Routes and  No steps or obstacles Visual inspection
Approaches  Dimensions: width, slope, passing and turning Tape-line, angle measurer,
spaces.
 Surface finishes, signage, external lighting
Gradients and Ramps  Dimensions: width, horizontal landing, slope and Tape-line, angle measurer
length Visual inspection
 Handrail and guards Gradient meter
 Tactile walking surface indicator
- 81 -
CEN 207 Inventory

device used
Elements
Steps and Stairs  Dimensions: width, rise and going of steps, Tape-line
staircase landings
 Head clearance
 Handrail and guards
 Visual and tactile warnings
Handrails  Provision Visual inspection
 Profile, continuity and horizontal extension Tape-line.
 Installation: height, mechanical resistance Vernier Calipers to measure
 Visual and tactile information Diameter
External Lifts  Car and door dimensions Tape-line

 Manoeuvring space outside the car Visual inspection
 Automatic doors (suitable time…)
 Easily location (contrast…)
 Provision of handrail
 Surface finishes
 Lighting
 Emergency warnings
 Control devices easily reached (height) and
located (visual contrast, tactile information))
 Visual and acoustic information
SurfaceFinishes  Even, stable and firm Visual inspection
 slip resistant test on site
 Tactile walking surface indicators
Crossing Points, Signage of crossing points (on the pavement and Visual inspection
Tactile Paving, and vertical signs) Tape-line
Dropped Kerbs Provision of dropped kerbs
Profile: width, slope
Tactile warning surface
Drop Off/Pick Up
Zones
Car parking Provision Visual inspection
 Location Tape-line
 Minimum width and length BS 6571 - 4:1989 Vehicle
 Kerb ramp parking control equipment-
 Surface Part 4: Specification for
 Signage barrier type parking control
equipment
Obstacles on a path  Visual indicators for unavoidable obstacles Tape-line, Visual inspection
and Street Furniture  Design to be detectable width cane
Street furniture: Location
Street furniture: suitable design for ease of use
Seating and rest areas Provision Visual inspection
 furniture: location, suitable design for ease of use Tape-line
 types of seating, benches
Facilities for Guide  Provision of dog relief area (larges buildings) Verification of the service,
Dogs with customer service staff
Signage and  Suitable amplification and acoustic conditions Visual inspection
Wayfinding (external - Acoustic inspection
audible)
Signage and  Tactile walking surface indicators, change in Visual inspection
Wayfinding (external - material
tactile)  Guided path
 Provision of raised tactile and Braille signs
- 82 -
CEN 207 Inventory

device used
Elements
Signage and  Additional illumination or luminance contrast Visual inspection
Wayfinding (external -  Visual contrast
visual)  Information signs outside the building
Location
Height
Font and size of lettering
Differences in LRV
Glare free
Illumination
Understable
Lighting (external)  Provision Visual inspection.
 Minimum illumination photometer
 Positioning of lights
Internal
Environments
Entrances  Identification Visual inspection
 Level threshold Tape-line
 Passage width and height Plunger/dynamometer
 Circulation spaces, manoeuvring area BS 6262:1982 Code of
 Detailed requirements for internal doors practice for glazing for
Operating force buildings AMD 4063; AMD
Visual indicators for Glazed doors 4582; AMD 8279 (Partially
Location, visual contrast superseded but remains
Door locks reachable and operable current)
BS 6262-1:2005 Glazing for
buildings Part 1 to Part 7
BS 7036-1:1996 Code of
practice for Safety at
powered doors for
pedestrian use – Part 1.
General
BS 7036-4:1996 Code of
practice for Safety at
powered doors for
pedestrian use – Part 4. Low
energy swing doors
Reception Areas,  Location (easily recognizable, glare free…) Visual inspection
counters, desks and  Space to manoeuvre Tape-line
ticket offices  Suitable design of a counter, desk and ticket Photometer
office Acoustic inspection
 Even illumination
 Queue number ticket system designed to be
accessible
 Hearing enhanced system
Provision of seats with a suitable design
Security Provisions Accessible fastenings Visual inspection
Accessible Surveillance System Test site
Storage Facilities  Minimum manoeuvring space Visual inspection
 reachability of the shelves Tape-line
 opening direction
Circulation Routes  No steps Visual inspection
 Minimum clear width and length of passage Tape-line
 No hanging objects on walls (easily detectable
width cane)
- 83 -
CEN 207 Inventory

device used
Elements
 Surface finishes
 Lighting
 Visual contrast
 Signage and wayfinding
Manoeuvring spacere  Minimum space required for a 90º-180º turn Visual inspection
quirements Tape-line
Lobbies  Unobstructed manoeuvering space between Visual inspection
doors Tape-line
 Visual awareness of an entrance door
 Visual marking
Internal Doors  Clear width and height Visual inspection
 Level threshold Tape-line
 Manoeuvering space Plunger/dynamometer
 Operating force
 Visual indicators for Glazed doors, visual contrast
 Door locks reachable and operable
Windows  Restrictions opening Visual inspection
 Easy manoeuvrability of hardware and shutters Tape-line
 Height
Passenger Lifts Provision (number) Verification of the service
 Car and door dimensions test on site
 Manoeuvering space outside the car Tape-line
 Automatic doors (suitable time…) Visual inspection
 Easily location (contrast…) EN 81-1: 1999 Safety rules
 Equipment in the car : Provision of handrail for the construction and
 Surface finishes installation of lifts - electric
 Lighting lifts(Amd 1) (+A3:2009)
 Emergency warnings EN 81-2:1999 Safety rules
 Control devices easily reached (height) and for the construction and
located (visual contrast, tactile information)) installation of lifts -
 Visual and acoustic information hydraulic lifts(Amd 1)
(+A3:2009)
EN 81-70:2003 Safety rules
for the construction and
installation of lifts –
Particular applications for
passenger and good
passenger lifts. Accessibility
to lifts for persons including
persons with disability (Amd
A1:2005)
Platform Lifts / Lifting  Height Verification of the service
Platforms  Platform dimensions test on site
 Maximum Force to be able to withstand Tape-line
 Guarding Visual inspection
Stairs  Dimensions: width, rise and going of steps, Tape-line
staircase landings Visual inspection
 Head clearance
 Visual and tactile warnings
Ramps  Dimensions: width, horizontal landing, slope and Tape-line
length Visual inspection
 Tactile walking surface indicator
- 84 -
CEN 207 Inventory

device used
Elements
Escalators  Rise and going of steps (stairs) Tape-line
 Warning indicators at the top and bottom Verification of the service
 Minimum level of illumination test on site
Dimensions: width, horizontal landing
Speed limit
Guards and handrails
Visual and tactile warnings
Travelators  Minimum level of illumination Tape-line
Dimensions: width, horizontal landing Verification of the service
Speed limit test on site
Guards and handrails
Visual and tactile warnings
Handrails  Provision Visual inspection
 Profile, continuity and horizontal extension Tape-line.
 Installation: height, mechanical resistance
 Visual and tactile information
Sanitary facilities for  Toilet seat height, depth and distance to wall Visual inspection
ambulant disabled  Clear manoeuvring space in front of the toilet Tape-line.
people  Opening doors
(Toilets/Showers/Cha  Grab rails
nging)
Sanitary facilities for Provision Visual inspection
wheelchair users  Dimensions, Clear maneuvering space Tape-line.
(Toilets/Showers/Cha  Doors (width, opening system)
nging)  Toilet seat height, depth and distance to wall
 Grab rails
 Washbasins: dimensions,
 Water supply
 Tap controls
 Urinals
 Shower place, bathrooms
 Other fittings reachable
 Alarm
 Minimum illumination
 Finished surfaces
 Location of light switches
Sanitary facilities for  Toilet seat height, depth and distance to wall Visual inspection
other users - e.g. Tape-line.
Children, enlarged
WCs, etc.
(Toilets/Showers/Cha
nging)
First Aid Facilities  Assisted evacuation. Rescue techniques (very Check Emergency Plan
general considerations in annex C)
Surface Finishes  Slip-resistant conditions Visual inspection
 Anti-glare test on site
 Visual contrast
Glazing and  Visual marking Visual inspection
Manifestations/marki Tape-line
ngs
Colour Contrasts  Visual contrast Spectrophotometer
 Difference in reflectance value BS 8493:2008 (+A1:2010):
Light reflectance value (LRV)
of a surface - Method of
test
- 85 -
CEN 207 Inventory

device used
Elements
Signage and  Suitable amplification and acoustic conditions Acoustic inspection
wayfinding (interior -
audible)
Signage and  Additional illumination or luminance contrast Visual inspection
wayfinding (interior -  Visual contrast Tape-line
visual)  Information signs outside the building
 Location
 Height
 Font and size of lettering
 Differences in LRV
 Glare free
 Illumination
 Understable
 Information displays
Signage and  Tactile walking surface indicators, change in Visual inspection
wayfinding (interior - material Tape-line
tactile)  Guided path
 Tactile maps and floor plans
 Provision of raised tactile and Braille signs
Lighting (interior)  Location of windows Visual inspection
 Level of illumination Light meter (Photometer)
 Limitation of glare and shadows
 Uniformity and luminance distribution
 Colour rendering
 Controls and adjustments
Acoustics  Location Acoustic inspection
 Information conveyed audibly
 Adequate sound isolation to mitigate noise
 Sound absorption of the surroundings surfaces
and furnishing of the room
Audible  Hearing enhancement systems at an information Acoustic inspection
Communication point test on site
Systems  Hearing enhancement systems provided in IEC 60118-4:2006
conference and meeting areas Electroacoustics. Hearing
 Acoustic warning systems aids. Induction loop systems
for hearing aidpurposes.
Magnetic field strength
Induction loop tester
Switches, Outlets and  Heights and distances Visual inspection

controls  Operation, identification, usability Tape-line
 Card access, dispensing machines
Emergency Egress  Fire defence plans –generic- Check Emergency Plan
Requirements  Fire evacuation routes (annex C) –generic- Visual inspection
Fire compartment Fire records
 Areas of rescue assistance Management plans
 Evacuation lift National Regulations
 Emergency wayfinding Standards (i.e in the UK they
have BS9999).
Refuse systems  Refuse bins (general requirement) Visual inspection
Tape-line
Furnishing (seating,  Seating (heights, armrest, back support…) Visual inspection
desks, etc)  Desks and ticket offices  Reception areas Test site
 Drinking fountains: height, usability…
- 86 -
CEN 207 Inventory

device used
Elements
Indoor-climate  (Only general considerations in Annex B) Sensory testing
Humidity, air currents, cold, heat,… Check levels of air quality
Pollen filters, air renewal (meter of air quality)
Transport Facilities
Bus Facilities Information on proximity, hours, accessibility Visual inspection
Rail Facilities Information on proximity, hours, accessibility Visual inspection
Taxi Facilities Information on proximity, hours, accessibility Visual inspection
Airport Facilities Information on proximity, hours, accessibility Visual inspection
Car Parking (including Provision Visual inspection
number, dimensions  Location Tape-line
and access)  Minimum width and length
 Kerb ramp
 Surface
 Signage
Parking Control  Height Tape-line
 Usability Test site
CycleParking Easy detection, no interference Visual inspection
Legend:
 To see detailed in others elements
 Without specifying, we consider the requirements for indoor environments of buildings
Considerations not included in ISO 21542, which have been covered by national/regional
standards or legislations
4.3.1.2 Analysis of the type of reference used in conformity assessment schemes
The second criteria used for analysis of the existing conformity assessment schemes for accessibility
is the type of the reference used
Any conformity assessment scheme is based on a reference. As the inventory stage proves, the most
used reference in accessibility assessment process are regulations. Even if the functional or technical
requirements concerning accessibility are presented in standards as is in Austria, Germany or the UK,
the assessment criteria are included only in regulation or in guidance for these regulations. The
standards reported here are coming mainly from products incorporated in the built environment
such as lifts.
Table 23 – Enforcement or addressing of conformity assessment schemes
Enforced through Regulations Standards Guidance
Total 43 10 22
Findings:
Majority of schemes are based on regulations (reported as follows: Austria, Cyprus, Estonia,
Finland, Latvia, Luxembourg and Sweden, one regulation; Italy and Norway( 2); Denmark,
Netherlands, Spain and UK (3), Ireland (4) and Belgium (9))
The conformity schemes based on regulations and guidance include all kind of schemes both
building control and others scopes (eg. fire protection, tourism)
Only few schemes are based on standards (as reported by Austria, Latvia, Spain, Belgium and
Germany(2) )
NOTE: This analysis is based only on the data collected by checklists.
- 87 -
4.3.1.3 Analysis of the requirements for technical capacities

The third criteria used for the analysis of the conformity assessment schemes of accessibility is the
extent that these take into consideration requirements for the technical capacities of the bodies or
persons involved in the process both of planning and construction works.
- 88 -
Table 24 – Analysis of the requirements for technical capacities

Requirements for technical Requirements Requirements Requirements
capacities established in established for established for established for
documents (regulations, planners and building contractors bodies or persons
standards, guidance) that designers operating BC
enforce conformity schemes on systems
accessibility?
Yes, total 29 16 16
Findings:
Only 7 EU countries reported that requirements for technical capabilities in accessibility are
established for planners and designers in place (Austria, Belgium, France, Netherlands, Spain
and UK);
Only 5 countries reported requirements established for building contractors (Austria,
Belgium, Netherlands and UK);
Only 8 countries reported requirements established for the bodies or persons operating
building control systems
NOTE: This analysis is based only on the data collected by checklists. Extended data are presented in
Annex H.1.
4.3.1.4 Analysis of the documents issued as evidence for attestation of accessibility assessment
As stated in the first part of this chapter, accessibility of the built environment results from a
sequence of processes like planning, construction, completion and use. In order to achieve
accessibility, the fulfillment of accessibility requirements has to be achievedin each of the sub
activities.
One way to determine this is to evaluate, assess and approve drawings and documents at various
stages during their development and to carry out site inspections. The documents issued for each of
these processes and attestations vary from country to country.
Based on data collected from 15 countries through the checklist launched at the start of this project,
documents issued during the process of planning, building control and construction works,
completion and use of buildings and shared areas are used.
Two stages for planning, application/planning and application/building project were enquired
about, due to the fact that in many countries these are carried out as separate activities, and that
approval of the application/planning is necessary for an approval of the project with all written and
drawn documentation.
The next phases are construction, followed by completion and use; detailed information and
abbreviations used for Conformity Assessment Schemes identification are presented in the Annex
H.2
The table below summarizes results:
- 89 -
Table 25 – Relationship between building phase and type of documents

Building phase Type of document
permits certificate others
Application/planning Urbanism certificate in Approved plans in
Romania Estonia, Finland, Latvia,
Netherland, Romania
and Sweden
Routing sheet in Austria
Application/building Building permit in Disability access Statement of city Safe
project Austria, Belgium, certificate for BCA – use and Accessibility
Cyprus, Denmark, DAC scheme in Ireland; issued by the architect
Estonia, Finland, and approved by an
Plans certificate for
Greece, Hungary, Adviser in Cyprus
Approved inspector
Latvia, Lithuania, Planning permission in
scheme in UK
Norway, Netherlands, Ireland
Romania and Sweden
Certification from
rehabilitation engineer
in Hungary
Building licence in Spain
Approved drawings for
Building Control (
England and Wales) in
UK
Construction Inspection notice in
Finland
Site records of the
constructors in
Germany in Norway
Enforcement notice in
case of non-compliance
in Ireland
Completion Occupancy permit in Certificate of Certificate of Safe use
Austria, Hungary completion in Norway and Accessibility in
and Spain Cyprus,
Permit of use in
Belgium Fire safety certificate Approval of use in
for BCA FSC in Ireland Finland,
Final certificate on Declaration of
completion in UK compliance in Germany,
Operating licence in
case of PD43/2002
scheme in Greece
Use Access audit reports for
the MININT and J-TAP
2008 scheme in Greece.
- 90 -
Findings:
The majority of documents are the type that indicates approval of the application and the
building/construction project
By their sheer dominance approval type documents make the application phase the most
important to assessment of accessibility requirements
Provided assessment of accessibility requirements can be performed adequately in this
phase, the chances of final as-built compliance increases.
The second most important building phase relevant to the assessment of accessibility
requirements is completion, and this is in addition is when most certificates are issued. A
certificate signifies involvement of a third party, as representatives of authorities in this case
are in charge with.
4.3.2 The conformity assessment schemes in accessibility labels and awards.
4.3.2.1 Overview
Labels and awards concerning accessibility are good tools to increase awareness of the topic and to
disseminate good practice.
Even though not all may fulfil the requirements stipulated in European standards, they provide a lot
of information about the facilities and services of the entities assessed and can also be useful tools
when altering or extending existing buildings and public spaces.
Normally, a label or an award includes more criteria than the built environment alone because the
service, facility or whole place may be assessed. They can be applied toan accessible city, building or
community. Team B decided to illustrate some labels and awards to demonstrate how they can
beused as appropriate tools to monitor the accessibility of built environment.
4.3.2.2 TOURISM AND DISABILITY LABEL (France)
In France a Tourism and Disability label was introduced in 2001 to provide reliable and objective
information on the accessibility of tourist facilities. The label may be given to facilities which meet
prescribed accessibility standards for people with physical, hearing, vision or mental impairments,
each represented by a pictogram. The label is given for a period of five years and can be renewed
following re-assessment that the standards have been met. Labels can be applied for by a wide
variety of facilities including among others historic sites, castles, museums, restaurants, sports
facilities and parks
4.3.2.3 NATIONAL ACCESSIBLE SCHEME (NAS) LABEL (UK)
In the UK the National Accessible Scheme Label is used to identify how accessible holiday
accommodation is to people with mobility or sensory impairments. All properties are independently
audited by trained assessors. The written assessments outline strengths and areas for improvement
and are based on a set of defined standards. One Step Ahead is a lesser level assessed scheme which
assesses accommodation for people with mobility impairments without providing full wheelchair
accessibility. It also includes a visit from a trained consultant and specific advice about how to make
the property more accessible. The schemes are financed by fees, paid by the accommodation
owners.
4.3.2.4 ENAT CODE OF GOOD CONDUCT LABEL
The ENAT (European Network for Accessible Tourism) Code of Good Conduct is a commitment label
and certification scheme for public and private enterprises and organisations, recognising their
efforts to promote accessible travel and tourism. The label denotes the commitment of an enterprise
or organisation to follow a set of principles for the development of accessible tourism, within its
sphere of activity. The Code does not aim to measure compliance with access standards, national
norms or proprietary accessibility schemes and the label is therefore not a guarantee or symbol of
- 91 -
“full accessibility”. Signing the Code allows the user to display a European and international label and
certificate which can complement existing accessibility labels.
4.3.2.5 EXCELLENCE THROUGH ACCESSIBILITY AWARD SCHEME (EtA) (Ireland)
The EtA Award is a quality label developed for public bodies which is awarded to organisations that
have achieved a standard of excellence in all three areas of Customer Services, Built Environment and
Information and Communications Technology. The organisations are assessed by trained inspectors
using an assessment tool which includes 14 accessibility guidelines and 41 criteria. The focus is on
continuing commitment to improvement of public services and buildings and the awards are made at
three levels – Commitment, Quality and Excellence.
4.3.2.6 WORLD ARCHITECTURE FESTIVAL AWARD SCHEME
The ONCE Foundation inaugurated the first World Architecture Festival Accessibility Award Scheme
in Barcelona in 2010
4.3.2.7 ACCESS CITY AWARD SCHEME
The Access City Award rewards cities with over 50,000 inhabitants which take exemplary initiatives to
improve accessibility in the urban environment.
The applicants present the work implemented and planned to improve the accessibility for persons
with disabilities in their city environment, including actions, policies and initiatives. The initiative
must be ongoing and demonstrate (or will demonstrate) improved accessibility for persons with
disabilities in all four key areas:
 accessibility to the built environment and public spaces
 accessibility to transportation and related infrastructures
 accessibility to information and communication technologies
 accessibility to public facilities and services
The applicant must show evidence of having improved accessibility for persons with disabilities (i.e.
evidence should be benchmarked);
Evaluation criteria
1. Scope of the actions/initiatives
The applicant shall demonstrate a global approach and an ambitious vision for the future in
tackling accessibility in the city.
2. Ownership, level of commitment
The applications should demonstrate that the actions/initiatives in these different areas are
part of a global strategy or policy framework, rather than just ad-hoc projects.
The accessibility strategy, following design-for-all, should be included in the city’s policies
and its regulations. Appropriate resources (staff, budget, etc…) should be allocated to
implement these policies.
3. Impact
The city’s policies/initiatives should have a demonstrable impact on the everyday life of the
city and persons with disabilities. The applicants should therefore include qualitative and
quantitative data to support claims of success. Planned initiatives and policies will be
considered for their coherence and potential impact.
4. Quality and sustainability of results
The quality of results is defined in terms of improvements made to the level of accessibility
and its compliance with standards and legislation.
- 92 -
Delivering sustainable results to ensure the full accessibility requires continuous efforts, the
establishment of a sound structure and monitoring mechanisms (for regularly checking
accessibility, notifying and repairing problems, handling complaints etc.).
5. Involvement of persons with disabilities and relevant partners
Active and clear involvement of persons with disabilities, their representative organisations,
and accessibility experts should be demonstrated in both the planning, implementation and
maintenance of city’s policies and initiatives aimed at increased accessibility.
4.3.3 International experience and practices – Australia, Canada and USA
Australia, Canada and USA reported an experience of almost 20 years in the field of accessibility. An
overriding factor in these countries outside the EU has been the existence of Human Rights
Legislation backed up by Building Codes, Regulations and Standards. A number of instruments,
standards and practices were identified which appear to have contributed to the effective
implementation of accessibility legislation.
These include:
Australia
A comprehensive suite of accessibility standards is available including enhanced and
additional requirements, requirements for children and adolescents, tactile surfaces and
orientation. Guidance relevant to accessibility and usability is also covered in other standards
such as standards for glass, colour, signs, lighting and slip resistance
An administrative protocol entitled A Process to Administer Building Access for People with a
Disability aims to ensure a consistent approach to the implementation of access
requirements in both new and existing buildings
A system of “Access Panels” of experts has been established to guide and assist certifiers
with difficult access questions
Canada
Like Australia a comprehensive suite of accessibility standards is available under CSA B651
Regulations under the Ontario Accessibility Act are being developed and will cover, inter alia,
built environment
Both Standards and Guidance Documents, such as the City of London Facility Accessibility
Design Standards, are presented in a user friendly format and are easy to apply by both
designer and certifier
An Accessible Procurement Toolkit has been produced by Industry Canada
United States of America
The ADA Standards for Accessible Design provide extensive coverage across almost all
building elements, including existing building, but are principally focused on people with
mobility limitations. They are also very difficult to negotiate.
A mediation programme, introduced by the Department of Justice, facilitates the resolution
of conflicts
Building Code Departments are responsible for issuing construction permits, for inspecting
construction and for issuing occupancy certificates. A multiplicity of codes which were not
harmonised with standards has restricted the effectiveness of the system
The following three sections are reports received from contact persons in respectively Australia,
Canada and USA. The conclusions and views are theirs.
- 93 -
4.3.3.1 Conformity Assessment of accessibility in Australia

The responsibilities for assessment of accessibility mainly are to:
Australian Building Codes Board – This body is responsible for the development of the
Building Code of Australia (BCA), which dictates how all buildings throughout Australia are to
be constructed. It tells you “what you have to do” whilst the standards “tell you how to
achieve the outcome”. We have just recently completed an alignment of the BCA to the DDA
legislation which requires the same level of compliance from the Federal legislative base, the
DDA and the Federal building regulations, the BCA. Over the past 15 years we have been
fortunate in gradually adding building requirements for disability access into the BCA,
however the BCA only catered for the 80th percentile of people with disabilities, whereas the
DDA required that the 90th percentile must be catered for in our built environment.
Local Government Building Regulations – These are the City and Shire Councils, which in
addition to the BCA have their own specific building requirements that in many cases may be
unique to their area. Many of these are additional disability access requirements that go
beyond the BCA requirements. They are referred to as Development Controls Plans (DCPs)
Other Bodies involved in accessibility of the built environment are:
Association of Consultants in Access Australia. (ACAA)
State Building Commissions who also play a part in the administering of disability access
being incorporated into the built environment.
Tertiary Education bodies in assisting in the training and education of students who will work
in the area of the built environment.
Conformance Assessment Schemes (CAS)
These are administered by in every case by the Building Surveyors, Certifiers and in many cases
Access consultants. Involvement takes place in many cases on a project from the planning of the
brief. Other projects, access consultants are not brought in until the concept/schematic stages,
which in turn are then approved by the local planning authorities. Each of the following stages,
detailed design, detailed documentation, site inspections throughout the project and final
inspection at practical completion are all certified by building surveyors in every case and in the
majority of cases by access consultants. The latter involvement is voluntary in the private to
have access consultants approved, but as disability access inclusion in a building or facility is a
requirement they are more often than not involved.
As a signatory to the UN convention of Rights of Persons with Disabilities and a major contributor
to the Bill of Rights, Australia is 100% behind all that it stands for. Our Federal Disability
Discrimination Act - 1992 legislation requires that Disability Action Plans (DAPs) are developed by
all organisations, but as this is claims based legislation, many private companies have not
provided and registered DAPs. But when a claim is made against them, this is the trigger that
encourages them to develop a DAP.
4.3.3.2 Conformity Assessment of accessibility in Canada
The responsibilities for assessment of accessibility mainly are to:
At the National/Federal level
The Canadian Human Rights Act establishes the high level accessibility principles for sectors
regulated by the Federal government (Defence, inter-provincial transportation, banking,
federal government facilities and services, telecommunications, etc.). The Act is available at
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/h-6/243963.html
The National Building Code (NBC) is the primary source of accessibility requirements for new
construction and alteration to existing buildings. The 2010 Code is available for purchase at
http://www.nationalcodes.ca/eng/national_codes_home.shtml. It should be noted that the
- 94 -
NBC is a model Code only – it is not law unless adopted by a Province or Territory. Most
larger Provinces have their own Provincial Building Codes.
The National Transportation Sector (as against the Provincial Transportation Sectors), are
regulated by a series of Acts. A list of the transportation related Acts can be found at
http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/acts-regulations/menu.htm
Industry Canada has developed an Accessible Procurement Toolkit which can be accessed at
http://www.apt.gc.ca/. The Government of Canada’s Public Procurement policies and
process can be viewed at http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/ga-sm/chapitre01-
chapter01-eng.html
The Canadian Standards Association (CSA) is a private, not-for-profit organization which
develops Standards for all aspects of Canadian society. Of particular interest are a suite of
accessibility Standards under the B651 identifier including Standards for the built
environment, banking machines, interactive self-service devices and point-of-sales terminals.
There is also a CSA standard on Inclusive Design for an ageing population - CAN/CSA B659-08
– however this particular Standard is quite generic and lacking in specifics. The Government
of Canada has adopted CAN/CSA B651-09 as a standard for accessibility for all of its facilities.
At the Provincial/Territory Level (10 Provinces and 3 Territories)
Each Province/Territory has its own Human Rights Code – establishing accessibility principles
for sectors regulated by the Provincial government (Transportation within provinces, land
use, building development, employment, etc.
Provinces and Territories either adopt the National Building Code or incorporate sections of
the NBC into their own Provincial building codes. Accessibility provisions within the various
Provincial Building Codes are nor harmonised – there are many variations and
inconsistencies. The British Columbia Building Code is considered to be one of the more
progressive.
The Province of Ontario is the first in Canada to develop an Accessibility Act – the
Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA). This Act regulates accessibility for
companies offering goods, service and facilities to persons in Ontario. Regulation are being
developed and are in the process of being implemented in the following areas:
- Customer Service (enacted)
- Information and Communication (likely to be enacted by mid 2011)
- Transportation (likely to be enacted by mid 2011)
- Employment Practices (likely to be enacted by mid 2011)
- Built Environment (date of enactment unclear – much controversy)
At the Municipal Level
- While accessibility of the building itself is regulated by Provincial Building Codes, the
accessibility of the exterior site elements (parking, landscape areas, walkways, etc.) are
regulated by Municipal bylaws. Each municipality in Canada has its own bylaws – so they are
extremely varied. Some of the Municipalities who have been progressive with their
accessibility programs are London (Ontario), Winnipeg (Manitoba) and Saanich (British
Columbia).
- Many municipalities have developed their own accessibility standards – in direct response to
the inadequate accessibility provisions within the Provincial Building Codes. Some of the
most progressive accessibility standards development work is happening at the municipal
level in Canada. Such municipal standards are typically mandatory for municipally funded
- 95 -
project only. Municipalities have no legislative authority to impose accessibility building

standard. At this time, the most progressive Municipal accessibility standards is Winnipeg.
4.3.3.3 Conformance Assessment Schemes (CAS)
The building permit system assesses compliance with accessibility code requirements. Human rights
commissions have the right to conduct conformance assessments and do so periodically. The
Canadian Human Rights Commissions audited samples of federal offices, banks, bank machines, etc
and published reports. They followed up periodically. The Ontario Human Rights Commission did
the same but other provinces have not been so active. At the municipal level, many municipalities
are asking their architects and other designers to complete a compliance checklist and ‘sign-off’ that
everything has been completed satisfactorily.
4.3.3.4 Conformity Assessment of accessibility in United State of America
The USA framework concerning accessibility requirements (technical or functional):
There are a number of disability rights laws in existence within the USA. The most important of these
with regard to accessibility is the Americans with Disabilities Act.
On July 26, 1990, President George Bush signed into law the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
This significant legislation extends civil rights to an estimated 43 million Americans with disabilities in
much the same way that individuals are protected on the basis of race, colour, sex, national origin
and religion. The ADA makes it illegal to discriminate on the basis of disability in the areas of
employment, public services, public accommodations, transportation and telecommunications. The
ADA was later updated in 2008 with changes effective 1st January 2009, a further revision was
published in the Federal Register on 15th September 2010, which will take effect on 15th March
2011.
People with disabilities can no longer be denied employment just because they are disabled. In
addition, the ADA requires that restaurants, movie theatres, libraries, doctors’ offices, parks and
millions of other public accommodations be accessible to people with disabilities. The services
provided by state and local governments must also conform to ADA requirements.
The ADA applies to all people with physical or mental impairments that substantially limit one or
more major life activities. Such activities include walking, talking, hearing, seeing, breathing, learning,
performing manual tasks and caring for oneself. Other kinds of major life activities contained in the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s Interpretive Guidelines include sitting, standing, lifting,
and reaching. The law also applies to individuals who have a history of such impairment, as well as
those who are perceived as having such impairment.
Attached to the ADA are the 1991 ADA Standards for Accessible Design, (28 CFR Part 36, revised July
1, 1994) issued by the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice have announced that the
2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design must be used on and after 15th March 2012, which will be
released soon. These guidelines are to be applied during the design, construction, and alteration of
such buildings and facilities to the extent required by regulations issued by Federal agencies,
including the Department of Justice, under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
The Department of Justice is responsible for enforcing the ADA.
The Department may file lawsuits in Federal court to enforce the ADA and may obtain court orders
including compensatory damages and back pay to remedy discrimination. Under title III the
Department may also obtain civil penalties of up to $55,000 for the first violation and $110,000 for
any subsequent violation.
The Department sometimes resolves cases without filing a lawsuit by means of formal written
settlement agreements or in some instances, the public accommodation, commercial facility, or State
or local government promptly agrees to take the necessary actions to achieve compliance. In others,
extensive negotiations are required.
- 96 -
The ADA requires the Department of Justice to provide technical assistance to businesses, State and
local governments, and individuals with rights or responsibilities under the law. The Department
provides education and technical assistance through a variety of means to encourage voluntary
compliance. Activities include providing direct technical assistance and guidance to the public
through the ADA Website and the ADA Information Line; developing and disseminating technical
assistance materials to the public; and undertaking outreach initiatives.
The Department of Justice operates a free ADA Information Line to provide information and
publications to the public about the requirements of the ADA. A 24 hour automated service, which
allows callers to order publications, ask about filing a complaint or speak to specialists regarding
technical questions (latter facility only available at specific times).
In this context, requirements for different building phase are as follow:
- Building Regulations and Planning
The construction or alteration of any freestanding structure over 10m2 (108sq.ft.) in area is
required to have a Building Permit. A building permit is a licence that is required prior to
construction to ensure that the design meets with the standards set out in a particular state. It
gives building officials the means to enforce the requirements of the standards.
Many states use the ADA Standards for Accessible Design or the International Building Code, but
others have their own standards for accessibility. These standards are enforced by the state or
local city or town authority. Accessibility is reviewed and approved at the same time as other
aspects of the design i.e. when the project is submitted for a building permit and during the
construction process. There is no requirement for a separate report to be submitted with regard
to access at any stage.
- Plan Reviewer
The building plan reviewer, or examiner, reviews and inspects engineering and architectural
drawings when a project is still in the design phase. They function as a form of quality control by
double-checking calculations and verifying compliance with building codes. If plans are not code
compliant the plan reviewer must work with the design team (i.e. architects and engineers) to
develop solutions that are effective and follow the building codes. The plan reviewer interprets
codes if their application is unclear.
- Building Inspector
Building inspectors examine all aspects of a building's construction to verify conformance with
applicable building codes. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, "inspectors make an initial
inspection during the first phase of construction and follow up with further inspections
throughout the construction project." Building inspectors in some municipalities must perform
periodic checks on buildings to verify continuing code compliance. These checks can be on
certain building systems, such as elevators, or for whole public buildings such as schools or
entertainment venues.
Bodies involved in accessibility of the built environment
others have their own standards. The Department of Justice provides education and technical
assistance through a variety of means. Activities include providing direct technical assistance and
guidance to the public through the ADA Website and the ADA Information Line; developing and
disseminating technical assistance materials to the public; and undertaking outreach initiatives.
Conformance Assessment Schemes (CAS)
All new buildings must meet the minimum requirements of the State’s standards and CAS operates
mainly through the building inspection process. However, whilst standards offer guidance on physical
- 97 -
provision they do not consider the policies and procedures adopted by the service provider to ensure
discrimination doesn’t occur.
4.4 Identification and analysis of the accessibility assessment schemes for construction products
and other products used in built environment
In build environment are included many products that have a role to assure an accessibility of the
persons that used building, shared area and public spaces. There are incorporated construction
products as doors, windows and building hardware including shutters and blinds (outdoor and
indoor), curtain walling, Sanitary appliances, Circulation Fixtures, Floorings, Internal and external wall
and ceiling finishes and others.
Also for these products we can follow how and where is applied the functional approach of
conformity according ISO 17000 that include the following phases:
1. Selection
2. Determination
3. Review and attestation
4. Surveillance
Construction products are covered by the essential requirements from former Construction Products
Directive - CPD and new approved Construction Products Regulation - CPR. A transition period is
developing between 2011 and 1 July 2013 when the new CPR will be mandatory. One of the main
inputs of the CPR is accessibility requirement included as essential for construction works together
with safety.
Other products included in built environment according the requirements of the design and used
during life cycle of the building or shared areas are: lifts, escalators and moving Walks, Sports,
playground and other recreational facilities and equipment, Domestic Appliances, Fire
alarm/detection, fixed firefighting, fire and smoke control and explosion suppression products,
Waste Water Engineering Products, Space heating, letter boxes and plates, furniture for office and
households, street furniture and gardening product.
There are in forced by different regulation for these products to assure the safety requirements. Only
lifts, escalators and moving walks are covered by a dedicated directive and there are assessment
procedures in European standards that are in forced in all Europe. The conformity assessment
scheme is the module H that is the most comprehensive and includes project approval, type tests
and certification of the quality assurance system of the manufacturer. The notify body issue the
Certificate of conformity and the manufacturer affixed the appropriate CE marking. Regular
surveillance is performed by the notified body.
In this case, the level of confidence is maximum due to the great risks involved by the use of these
products. The determination activities performed by the notified body are project approval, type
tests and certification of the quality assurance system. The type tests have to be performed both in
notified test laboratories and on site. The review and attestation activities are performed by the
notified body.
There are many standardization mandates for different categories of products mentioned above but
none of the resulting standards include accessibility requirements as those indicated in the Guide
CEN/CLC Guide 6.
The construction products already mentioned are covered by the CPD but their system of attestation
of conformity is 3 and rather 4. In these systems the manufacturer issued a declaration of conformity
with the harmonised European standards. In system 3, manufacturer has to issue the declaration of
conformity with the harmonised European standards based on testing in notified laboratory. The
problem is that none of the European harmonised standards within CPD include requirements
regarding accessibility.
- 98 -
In this situation we can appreciate that conformity assessment schemes are mostly by first party, the
selection activities used harmonised EN and determination activities are testing, in case of system 3
performed in notified laboratories and for system 4, tests are performed by manufacturer in its
premises or external. In both situations, manufacturers have the obligation to preserve records of
the fulfillment of the essential requirements and to show them to request. The surveillance
responsibility is to manufacturer too because they have to market only conforming products.
In case of construction products, situations will be significantly changed due to the new CPR that was
approved by European Parliament in 9 March 2011. Accessibility is now included as one of the basic
requirements and new guidelines are waiting. Another important change regarding the construction
products is the way to express conformity. The new CPR asks for declaration of performance of the
products instead of attestation of conformity..
If EU will promote an Accessibility Act as is foreseen in the Disability Strategy, there is the
opportunity to develop standards and to support the assessment of accessibility requirements at
least with those mentioned in Guide Guide CLC 6 also for others products included in built
environment.
4.5 Identification and analysis of the accessibility assessment schemes for transport related built
facilities
4.5.1 Freedom of movement
EU guaranties the freedom of movement to all citizens. This means that anyone can move, work and
live in every countries of the EU. Freedom of movement involves appropriate built infrastructure
both on land, air or water adapted on the needs of disabled persons.
There are several EU regulations concerning the right of disabled passengers. In case of air transport,
a Regulation on the right of persons with disabilities was adopted by EU since 5 July 2006 where
focus is more on services of the disabled persons than on ground infrastructure or airplane. Also the
Commission has adopted proposals in December 2008 on passenger rights in sea and inland
waterway transport, and international coach/bus transport. Depending on the legislative process,
these can be expected to come into force within a few years. The most developed regulations
regarding the assessment of built environment infrastructure are presented for the railways.
A more detailed presentation of the conformity assessment requirements is provided below for the
situation of the air transport (4.5.2) and railways (4.5.3).
4.5.2 Conformity assessment requirements in case air transport
In 5 July 2006, the European Union adopted a new Regulation on the rights of persons with
disabilities and persons with reduced mobility travelling by air. The regulation is the first disability
specific legislation adopted by the European Union ever and it its requirements will hopefully lead to
an end of the discrimination of air passengers with disabilities.
Any person with reduced mobility or sensory impairment, intellectual disability or any other cause of
disability, age, and whose situation needs appropriate attention and the adaptation to his or her
particular needs of the service made available to all passengers are covered by this Regulation.
The overall principle and aim of the Regulation is to guarantee equal treatment for all passengers,
including those with a disability. This implies:
Boarding
Assistance
Mobility equipment and assistive devices
Accessible information
Complaints
Regulation (EC) No 1107/2006 of the Parliament and of the Council concerning the rights of disabled
persons and persons with reduced mobility when travelling by air stipulated the responsibility of the
- 99 -
managing bodies to assure all requirements that can fulfil the needs of the disabled persons. In
annex A of this regulation are listed the assistance and arrangements necessary to enable disabled
persons and persons with reduced mobility to:
Communicate their arrival at an airport and their request for assistance at the designated points
inside and outside terminal buildings mentioned in Article 5,
Move from a designated point to the check-in counter,
Check-in and register baggage,
Proceed from the check-in counter to the aircraft, with completion of emigration, customs and
security procedures,
Board the aircraft, with the provision of lifts, wheelchairs or other assistance needed, as
appropriate,
Proceed from the aircraft door to their seats,
Store and retrieve baggage on the aircraft,
Proceed from their seats to the aircraft door,
Disembark from the aircraft, with the provision of lifts, wheelchairs or other assistance needed,
as appropriate,
Proceed from the aircraft to the baggage hall and retrieve baggage, with completion of
immigration and customs procedures,
Proceed from the baggage hall to a designated point,
Reach connecting flights when in transit, with assistance on the air and land sides and within and
between terminals as needed,
Move to the toilet facilities if required.
Where a disabled person or person with reduced mobility is assisted by an accompanying person,
this person must, if requested, be allowed to provide the necessary assistance in the airport and with
embarking and disembarking.
Ground handling of all necessary mobility equipment, including equipment such as electric
wheelchairs subject to advance warning of 48 hours and to possible limitations of space on board the
aircraft, and subject to the application of relevant legislation concerning dangerous goods has to be
provided. Ground handling of recognized assistance dogs, when relevant also has to be provided.
Communication of information needed to take flights in accessible formats.
Even this regulation doesn’t include explicitly requirements for the conformity assessment of the
accessibility of the ground infrastructure of the airport, the airport managing bodies have to take all
precautions to fulfil the above mentioned requirements and this mainly have an impact on built
environment. In this case, any alteration of the existing built environment in the airport has to be
planned and authorized according the national legislation for the construction works but the
outcome to fulfil the requirement of the
4.5.3 Conformity assessment requirements in railway
4.5.3.1 Overview
High-speed rail transport in EU showcases a remarkable set of regulations, standards and conformity
assessment procedures on accessibility that may have deep impact on quality for end users as well as
procurers and manufacturers in EU. The TSI-PRM (Technical specification for interoperability for
Persons with Reduced Mobility) is mandatory not only for new rolling stock but also infrastructure
related to buildings, likeplatforms, zones of access, and includes an EC declaration of verification on
accessibility as one of its main aspects. The complete system is a very good example of a close
relation between
A law/directive including a de facto standard, functionally and technically
Conformity assessment procedures that are clearly described (consists of several modules
depending on object, adaptation of existing buildings and structures)
- 100 -
Responsibility as to who can assess (mainly third party)

An EN standard on the detailed technical assessment is being developed (phase oriented)
Declaration of verification, certification of conformity and suitability for use, audits and
inspection
From the partners involved in the development of the TSI and the assessment standard it stands out
clear that uniform requirements and conformity assessment procedures are rated as extremely
important, if a standard is expected to work in practice, making it easier for procurers, construction
companies and consultants to understand and meet requirements in all member states, and not
least, providing the end users with equitable access of a certain quality across the EU. The level of
detailing and careful wording addresses the fact that the users of the assessment standard include a
wide range of professionals from designers in the early stages, to notified bodies carrying out final
assessment control.
As such there is no mention of an official capacity building program associated with the TSI PRM, but
authorities in some member states are by now offering courses on understanding the TSI PRM basics.
The EU-wide enforced procedures for conformity assessment that are an essential part of the TSI
PRM are very good examples of a successful de facto standard guaranteeing a minimum accessibility
standard to end users, and procurers with procedures applicable everywhere. Consequently, for
phase II the TSI PRM is one of the highly recommendable models for handling of built environment
elements; encompassing many of the essentials that should be present in effective conformity
assessment.
4.5.3.2 Scope of the TSI-PRM
TSI covers the Conventional and High Speed Rail Infrastructure and passenger Rolling Stock
subsystems as described in Annex I to Directive 2001/16/EC modified by Directive 2004/50/EC, only
for the Aspect ‘Accessibility for Persons with Reduced Mobility’. It also deals with some elements of
the ‘Telematics, Applications for Passengers’ subsystem, such as, for example, ticketing equipment.
The objective of this TSI is to enhance the accessibility of rail transport to the persons with reduced
mobility. Definition for ‘Persons with Reduced Mobility’ (PRM) means all people who have difficulty
when using trains or the associated Infrastructure. This includes the following categories:
Wheelchair users (persons who due to infirmity or disability use a wheelchair for
mobility)
Other mobility impaired including:
People with limb impairment;
People with ambulant difficulties;
People with children;
People with heavy or bulky luggage;
Elderly people;
Pregnant women.
Visually impaired.
Blind people.
Hearing impaired.
Deaf people.
Communication impaired (meaning persons who have difficulty in communicating or
understanding the written or spoken language, and including foreign people with lack of
knowledge of the local language, people with communication difficulties and people with
sensory, psychological and intellectual impairments).
People of small stature (including children).
Impairments may be long-term or temporary, and may be visible or hidden.
- 101 -
This Directive include the accessibility of the public areas of the Infrastructure (including stations)
controlled by the Railway Undertaking, Infrastructure Manager or Station Manager. Particular
attention is to be devoted to:
(i) The problems generated by the interface platform-train which require a holistic perspective
between Infrastructure Rolling Stock;
(ii) The needs for evacuation in the case of hazardous situations.
This TSI does not specify operating rules for evacuation, but only technical and professional
qualification requirements. Purpose of technical requirements is to facilitate evacuation for all.
4.5.3.3 The essential requirements relate to:
— Safety;
— Reliability and availability;
— Health;
— Environmental protection;
— Technical compatibility.
These requirements include general requirements and requirements specific to each subsystem. In
accordance with Directive 2001/16/EC modified by Directive 2004/50/EC Annex II Infrastructure and
Rolling Stock are subsystems classified under ‘structural areas’. The relevant subsystem descriptions
are as follows, which in both cases specifically refer to the needs of PRM.
4.5.3.4 Infrastructure:
‘The track, points, engineering structures (footbridges, tunnels, etc.), associated station Infrastructure
(platforms, zones of access, including the needs of persons with reduced mobility, etc.), safety and
protective equipment.’
The associated station infrastructure (platforms, zones of access) is covered by the scope of M420.
The criteria and requirements for assessment of conformity for TSI-PRM requirements are indicated
in section 6 of the Directive. The conformity assessment approach is based on the use of modules
similar with those from New Approach Directive.
4.5.3.5 Conforminty assessment schemes used for TSI infrastructure
Conformity assessment schemes of the accessibility requirements for TSI subsystems are presented
below.
4.5.3.5.1 Conformity assessment (general)

In accordance with Annex VI of the Directive 96/48/EC, the contracting entity, or its authorized
representative established within the community (applicant) shall lodge an application for
assessment of conformity of the Rolling Stock or Infrastructure Subsystem with a notified body of its
choice.
This notified body shall have been notified to assess the Rolling Stock or Infrastructure Subsystem.
The EC declaration of verification in accordance with Article 18(1) and Annex VI to Directive
2001/16/EC modified by Directive 2004/50/EC shall be drawn up by the applicant.
This EC declaration of verification is required to obtain the authorisation to place the Subsystem into
service.
The Conformity Assessment of a Subsystem shall be performed according to one or a combination
of the following modules according to clause 6.2.2 and annex E to this TSI (The modules are
described in Annex F to this TSI):
Modules for the EC verification of subsystems
- 102 -
Module SB: Type examination for design and development phases

Module SD: Product quality management system for production phase
Module SF: Product verification for production phase
Module SG: Unit verification
Module SH2: Full quality management system with design examination for design, development and
production phases
The approval process and the contents of the assessment shall be defined between the applicant and
a notified body according to the requirements defined in this TSI and in conformance with the rules
set out in section 7 of this TSI.
4.3.5.2 Conformity assessment procedures (modules)
The applicant shall choose one of the modules or module combinations indicated in Table 24.
The characteristics of the Subsystem to be assessed during the relevant phases are indicated in
Annex E to the TSI directive, Table E.1 for Infrastructure subsystem. The applicant shall confirm that
each subsystem produced complies with the type.
Table 26 – Conformity assessment modules allocation
Subsystem to be assessed Module Module Module Module
SB + SD SB + SF SG SH2
Rolling Stock Subsystem X X - X
Infrastructure Subsystem X - X X
TSI –PRM establishes also the characteristic to be assessed during development phases of the
infrastructure
The sub-system characteristics to be assessed in the different phases of design, development and
production are presented below
Table 27 - Indication of the assessments of the Infrastructure subsystem
(constructed and supplied as single entity)
Design and
development phase
Production phase
Characteristics to be assessed Design review and/ Construction Assembly Validation under
or design assembling, (before putting full operation
examination mounting into service) conditions
4.1.2.2 Parking facilities for PRM x x
4.1.2.3 Obstacle-free routes
4.1.2.3.1 General x x
4.1.2.3.2 Route identification x x
4.1.2.4 Doors and entrances x x
4.1.2.5 Floor surfaces x x
4.1.2.6 Transparent obstacles x x
4.1.2.7 Toilets x x
4.1.2.8 Furniture and free- x x
standing devices
4.1.2.9 Ticketing/Counter or x x
- 103 -
Design and
development phase
Production phase
Characteristics to be assessed Design review and/ Construction Assembly Validation under
or design assembling, (before putting full operation
examination mounting into service) conditions
vending machine/Information
counter/Ticket control
machine/Turnstiles/Customer
Assistance points
4.1.2.10 Lighting x x
4.1.2.11 Visual information: x x
signposting, pictograms,
dynamic information x x x
4.1.2.12 Spoken information x x x
4.1.2.13 Emergency exits, alarms x x x
4.1.2.14 Geometry of bridges and x x
subways
4.1.2.15 Stairs x x
4.1.2.16 Handrails x x
4.1.2.17 Ramps, escalators, lifts, x x
travelators
4.1.2.18.1 Platform height x x
4.1.2.18.2 Platform offset x
4.1.2.18.3 Track layout along the x
platforms
4.1.2.19 Platform width and edge x x
of platform
4.1.2.20 End of platform x x
4.1.2.21 Boarding aid devices for x x
passengers using wheelchairs
4.1.2.22 Level track crossing at x x
stations
Note: the numbering in characteristic column is corresponding to the TSI-PRM Directive.

A detailed description of the conformity assessment modules is illustrated to annex H.3.
Findings:
The TSI-PRM covers the aspect ‘Accessibility for Persons with Reduced Mobility’ in a broad
sense and only in normal operation of the trains;
This directive is a good example for a document that includes both functional and technical
requirements as well the conformity assessment criteria, modules and detailed assessment
procedures
The TSI covers many of the general built environment elements (table 27)
The TSI already has got associated conformity assessment procedures
- 104 -
The TSI is already a law in all MS

It should seriously be considered to integrate many of the requirements and assessment
methods in a general CEN built environment standard. Probably this would be regarded as a
most welcome simplification and example of coordination for designers, architects,
authorities etc.
4.6 Legal framework for public procurement as regards accessibility and conformity assessment
for built environment
This clause describes the legal framework for public procurement in relation to accessibility,
conformity assessment and the built environment. Clause B.6.1 sets out the general rules applicable
to all public procurements. Clause B.6.2 describes the possibilities of including accessibility at
different stages of the procurement procedure. Clause B.6.3 describes conformity assessment in
relation to public procurements. Clause B.6.4 describes different forms of public procurement in the
domain of design and construction of the built environment.
For practical advice on the inclusion of accessibility criteria in public calls for tender, the reader is
referred to, e.g. The Build-for-All Reference Manual6.
4.6.1 General rules for all public procurements
4.6.1.1 Treaty obligations
Public procurement is subject to legislation in the European Union, with the main purpose to support
the realization and maintenance of the Single Market. Public procurement is subject to principles of
the EC Treaty and in particular to the principle of freedom of movement of goods, the principle of
freedom of establishment and the principle of freedom to provide services.
All procurements in the Member States have to comply with a set of principles derived from the
freedom principles of the EC Treaty: equal treatment, non-discrimination, mutual recognition,
proportionality and transparency7. The provisions of the directive regulate the procedures for
awarding of such contracts which are based on these principles so as to ensure the effects of them
and to guarantee the opening-up of public procurement to competition.
The principle of equal treatment implies that all suppliers shall be given equal opportunities and
conditions. For example, accessibility requirements of all products shall be verified and evaluated in
an equal manner for all tenderers.
The principle of non-discrimination prohibits all discrimination based on locality. No contracting
authority may, for example, give preference to a local company simply because it is located in the
city where the authority is based.
The principle of mutual recognition means that products lawfully produced and marketed in one
Member State should generally be admitted into circulation in other Member States, unless
otherwise justified. For public procurement, this implies that the contracting authority must accept
equivalent proof of compliance issued by recognized non-national bodies.
The principle of proportionality means that the contracting authority must not impose restrictions on
tenderers by setting out more far-reaching requirements than necessary to meet the needs in the
procurement in question. In addition, proportionality means that the personnel and financial
resources spent on the procurement process should be reasonable in relation to the scope and cost
of the subject-matter of the procurement.
The principle of transparency concerns the contracting authority’s obligation to provide information
on the procurement and on how it is going to be carried out, and convey that information to all
6
The Build-for-All Reference Manual; Info-Handicap and the “Build-for All” project, Luxembourg, 2006
7Directive 2004/18/EC Recital 2.
- 105 -
potential tenderers. Regarding the assessment of how a requirement is complied with, transparency
is ensured by referencing/using predictable and repeatable assessment procedures, such that
anyone running a check would most likely get the same result.
4.6.1.2 The Directives on public procurement
Two directives regulate public procurement in the European Union:
The Classical Directive: Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 31 March 2004 on the co-ordination of procedures for the award of public works
contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts.
The Utilities Directive: Directive 2004/17/EC Of the European Parliament and of the Council,
31st March 2004 Coordinating the Procurement procedures of entities operating in the
water, energy, transport and postal services sectors.
The Remedy Directive: Directive 2007/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 11 December 2007 amending Council Directives 89/665/EEC and 92/13/EEC with regard to
improving the effectiveness of review procedures concerning the award of public contracts.
The Procurement Directives regulate the procedures to be followed when buying the required
products, services or works, i.e. how to buy them. They do not prescribe the specific characteristics
of the products or services to be purchased, i.e. they do not prescribe what to buy. (In fact, the
Directives do not address the basic purpose of public procurement: to provide public entities with
products and services enabling them to carry out their tasks to the benefit of citizens and
enterprises.)
The Directives do contain provisions on conformity assessment, which are relevant for the purposes
of this project.
(For simplification and readability reasons, further text in section B.6 refers to the Classical Directive,
from now on referred to as “The Directive”. A summary of the Directive is available on
http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/internal_market/businesses/public_procurement/l22009_e
n.htm)
Non-mandatory European Commission recommendations supplement these mandatory rules. One
important example is the Commission’s eGovernment Action Plan, which stresses the importance of
extending the use of electronic procurement. The plan remarks that
“electronic procurement and invoicing could result in savings in total procurement costs of
around 5% and reductions in transaction costs of 10% or more, leading to savings of tens of
billions of Euros annually. In particular, SMEs can benefit from easier access to public
procurement markets and increasing their ICT-capabilities and thereby competitiveness.
The Action Plan concludes that a high level of take-up of eProcurement is therefore highly
desirable. Following these recommendations, the Member States have committed
themselves to giving all public administrations across Europe the capability of carrying out
100% of their procurement electronically (where legally permissible) and to ensuring that at
least 50% of public procurement above the EC threshold is carried out electronically by
2010.”
The work on conformity assessment in phase II of the Mandate needs to take account of the
outcome of the action plan on electronic procurement.
The aim of the Public Procurement Remedies Directives (Directives 89/665/EEC for the classical
sector and 92/13/EEC for the utilities sector) is to provide procedures for seeking redress in cases
where bidders consider contracts have been unfairly awarded.
Directive 2007/66/EC amends the Remedies Directives. It requires public authorities to wait a certain
number of days before concluding a public contract. This gives rejected bidders the opportunity to
start an effective review procedure at a time when unfair decisions can still be corrected. The
- 106 -
Directive also seeks to combat illegal direct awards of public contracts, which is the most serious
infringement of EU procurement law. National courts will also be able to render these contracts
ineffective if they have been illegally awarded without any transparency and prior competitive
tendering.
The Classical, Utilities and Remedies Directives apply to public contracts above a certain amount of
money, called threshold. In the Classical Directive the threshold is 162 000 Euro for products and
most services. For most services in the domain of design and construction of the built environment,
the threshold is 6 242 000 Euro.
4.6.1.3 National procurement regulations

For public contracts below the thresholds, national legislations apply. A study made by OECD8 gives
information on how Member States provide a framework of legislation or guidance on how
contracting authorities and entities should award contracts below the EU thresholds. Of the 22
Member States that replied, only in the UK and Ireland is guidance the exclusive means of instructing
purchasers about below-threshold obligations. The Netherlands has voluntary regulations and
guidance. Otherwise, Member States provide a below-threshold regime either through the
regulations covering the above threshold requirements or through national regulations, or a
combination of both.
4.6.2 Accessibility in the Procurement Directives

4.6.2.1 General provisions
The Directive encourages procurers to use accessibility criteria when defining the technical
specifications of a desired product/service. Article 23, paragraph 1 specifies that:
“whenever possible these technical specifications should be defined so as to take into
account accessibility criteria for people with disabilities or design for all users”.
The Directive leaves the accessibility criterialargely to the contracting authority’s discretion. The
words ‘whenever possible’ confirm the freedom of choice it is given to trade off costs against
accessibility considerations. It should be noted that "whenever possible" is more far-reaching than
"whenever appropriate" or "whenever necessary".
The Directive contains no equivalent to the concept of “undue burden”, a key concept in the US
legislation on accessibility. Undue burden means significant difficulty or expense, which would
exempt the contracting authority from pursuing such procurement. In determining whether an
action would result in an undue burden, an agency shall consider all agency resources available to
the program or component for which the product is being developed, procured, maintained, or used.
Accessibility can appear in the call-for-tender in four ways:
As a qualification criterion
As included in a technical specification
As an award criterion
As a condition for performing the contract
4.6.2.2 Accessibility as a qualification criterion
The first phase of evaluation of tenders is the selection, or qualification, phase. The objective is to
exclude those tenderers who are not qualified for performing the contract. Tenderers who do not
satisfy the qualification criteria will be excluded from the subsequent phases of the procedure.
8
OECD (2010), “Public Procurement in EU Member States - The Regulation of Contract Below the EU Thresholds and in
Areas not Covered by the Detailed Rules of the EU Directives”, Sigma Papers, No. 45, OECD Publishing.
- 107 -
There are two types of qualification criteria: one concerning the economic and financial standing of
the tenderer (Article 47), and one concerning the technical and/or professional ability of the tenderer
(Article 48). Qualification criteria are targeted to the tenderer as an organization.
Accessibility may be introduced as a criterion for evaluating the ability of the tenderer. Paragraph 2
of Article 48 contains an exhaustive list of means of proof, permissible to be required in the call-for-
tender. For example, a list of contracts carried out over the past five years where accessibility
considerations are included, whether the tenderer’s staff includes accessibility experts, a description
of the technical and educational and professional qualifications of the persons responsible for
managing the work.
In two key decisions (Case C-532/06 Lianakis, Case 31/87 Beentjes) the EC Court of Justice has lain
down that the qualification phase and the award of contract are two distinct phases governed by
different rules. In particular, criteria concerning the tenderer in general, such as experience,
organization, manpower and equipment are qualification criteria and cannot be used as award
criteria, since they are not considered as linked to the subject-matter of the procurement. For
example, accessibility criteria such as whether the tenderer has an accessibility policy, or an
organizational unit for accessibility, or whether accessibility is included in the quality management
system, are qualification criteria.
However, skills and education of those consultants who are named in the tender and appointed as
those who are actually intended to carry out the work are criteria linked to the subject-matter of the
procurement and hence can be used as award criteria.
4.6.2.3 Accessibility in technical specifications
Article 23, paragraph 1 specifies that technical specifications shall be set out in the contract
documentation.
“Technical specification” means the characteristics of a product or service that the contracting
authority wishes to buy. Annex VI, paragraph 1b, of the Directive provides a non-exhaustive list of
possible technical specifications:
“the required characteristics of a product or a service, such as quality levels, environmental
performance levels, design for all requirements (including accessibility for disabled persons)
and conformity assessment, performance, use of the product, safety or dimensions,
including requirements relevant to the product as regards the name under which the
product is sold, terminology, symbols, testing and test methods, packaging, marking and
labelling, user instructions, production processes and methods and conformity assessment
procedures;”
The principles applicable to technical specifications (non-discrimination, equal treatment,
transparency) are defined in Clause 29 of the preamble:
“The technical specifications drawn up by public purchasers need to allow public
procurement to be opened up to competition. To this end, it must be possible to submit
tenders which reflect the diversity of technical solutions.”
“The technical specifications should be clearly indicated, so that all tenderers know what
the requirements established by the contracting authority cover.”
The key rule on technical specifications is stated in art. 23, paragraph 3, of the Directive.
“Without prejudice to mandatory national technical rules, to the extent that they are
compatible with Community law, the technical specifications shall be formulated:
(a) Either by reference to technical specifications defined in Annex VI and, in order of
preference, to national standards transposing European standards, European technical
approvals, common technical specifications, international standards, other technical
reference systems established by the European standardization bodies or — when these do
- 108 -
not exist — to national standards, national technical approvals or national technical

specifications relating to the design, calculation and execution of the works and use of the
products. Each reference shall be accompanied by the words ‘or equivalent’;
(b) Or in terms of performance or functional requirements; the latter may include
environmental characteristics. However, such parameters must be sufficiently precise to
allow tenderers to determine the subject‑matter of the contract and to allow contracting
authorities to award the contract;
(c) Or in terms of performance or functional requirements as mentioned in subparagraph
(b), with reference to the specifications mentioned in subparagraph (a) as a means of
presuming conformity with such performance or functional requirements;
(d) Or by referring to the specifications mentioned in subparagraph (a) for certain
characteristics, and by referring to the performance or functional requirements mentioned
in subparagraph (b) for other characteristics.”
This means that contracting authorities are free to formulate accessibility specification by referring
either to standards or as performance/functional requirements. When there are no European or
international standards, contracting authorities must formulate the accessibility specifications in
performance or functional terms. Where referring to standards, each reference shall be followed by
the words “or equivalent”.
4.6.2.4 Accessibility as an award criterion
Article 53 of the Directive sets out that the criteria on which the contracting authorities shall base the
award of public contracts shall be either:
“(a) When the award is made to the tender most economically advantageous from the
point of view of the contracting authority, various criteria linked to the subject- matter of
the public contract in question, for example, quality, price, technical merit, aesthetic and
functional characteristics, environmental characteristics, running costs, cost-effectiveness,
after-sales service and technical assistance, delivery date and delivery period or period of
completion, or
(b) The lowest price only.”
A key phrase here is "linked to the subject-matter". Public procurers are free to select the criteria on
which they propose to base their award of the contract. However, the EC Court laid down in the
Lianakis case that their choice is limited to criteria aimed at identifying the tender which is
economically the most advantageous.
The list of criteria in alternative (a) is not exhaustive. Thus, accessibility can be used as an award
criterion provided that it is linked to the subject-matter of the contract. As an award criterion, there
is nothing unique about accessibility. The purpose of the award stage in the procurement process is
to allow the contracting authority to compare the tenders and assess which tender best meets its
needs. The chosen award criteria should help the contracting authority to do this. They should relate
to the intrinsic qualities of each of the tenders.
4.6.2.5 Accessibility in conditions for performing the contract
4.6.2.5.1 Provisions in the Directive
Article 26 states that
“Contracting authorities may lay down special conditions relating to the performance of a
contract, provided that these are compatible with Community law and are indicated in the
contract notice or in the specifications. The conditions governing the performance of a
contract may, in particular, concern social and environmental considerations.”
- 109 -
Such conditions do not need to be fulfilled at the time of tendering; however, the tenderer who will
be awarded the contract must fulfil them. As indicated in the Directive, conditions for performance
of the contract are mainly directed at conditions on the execution of services.
4.6.2.5.2 Buying Social
The European Commission published Autumn 2010 a guide, "Buying Social"9. The purpose of this
Guide is to raise contracting authorities’ awareness of the potential benefits of taking into account
social considerations in their public procurement. It also gives practical advice on how to include
social considerations in public procurement.
Buying Social defines Socially Responsible Public Procurement (SRPP) as
"‘SRPP’ means procurement operations that take into account one or more of the following
social considerations: employment opportunities, decent work, compliance with social and
labour rights, social inclusion (including persons with disabilities), equal opportunities,
accessibility design for all, taking account of sustainability criteria, including ethical trade
issues (6) and wider voluntary compliance with corporate social responsibility (CSR), while
observing the principles enshrined in the Treaty for the European Union (TFEU) and the
Procurement Directives."
The guide provides a nonexhaustive list of examples of social considerations potentially relevant to
public procurement. One such example is
"Promoting ‘accessibility and design for all’ (12), such as:
–– mandatory provisions in technical specifications to secure access for persons with
disabilities to, for example, public services, public buildings, public transport, public
information and ICT goods and services, including web based applications. The key issue is
to buy goods and services that are accessible to all."
The guide gives advice on how to include social considerations in different phases of procurement:
defining the requirements of the contract; selecting suppliers, service providers and contractors;
awarding the contract; and contract performance. It states that
"social considerations, depending on their nature, can be included only at certain stages of
the procurement procedure"
And that
"For example, social considerations regarding labour conditions are generally more
appropriate to be included in the contract performance clauses, as in general they do not
qualify as technical specifications or selection criteria, within the meaning of the
Procurement Directives. On the other hand, it is generally more appropriate to include
accessibility considerations in the technical specifications."
The guide addresses public works contracts in a reference to the Commission’s interpretative
Communication of 2001, which states that
‘Contracting authorities have a wide range of possibilities for determining the contractual
clauses on social considerations’ and lists ‘some examples of additional specific conditions
which a contracting authority might impose on the successful tenderer’.
One of these is
"The obligation to implement, during the execution of the contract, measures that are
designed to promote equality between men and women or ethnic or racial diversity, or
provide equal access to persons with disabilities."
9
Buying Social, A Guide to Taking Account of Social Considerations in Public Procurement, Luxembourg: Publications Office
of the European Union, 2010
- 110 -
The guide concludes that

"Public contracts for works and services, in which it is possible to lay down the manner in
which the contract is to be performed, provide the best opportunity for a contracting
authority to take account of social concerns in the contract performance clauses. It would
appear more difficult to envisage contractual clauses relating to the manner in which
supply contracts are performed, since imposition of clauses requiring changes to the
organisation, structure or policy of an undertaking established on the territory of another
Member State might be considered discriminatory or to constitute an unjustified restriction
of trade."
4.6.3 Conformity assessment in Procurement Directives
The Directive specifies rules on technical specifications and acceptance of proofs that tenders satisfy
requirements set out in the technical specifications. Recital 29 of the preamble gives the motivation
behind these rules:
“The technical specifications drawn up by public purchasers need to allow public
procurement to be opened up to competition. To this end, it must be possible to submit
tenders which reflect the diversity of technical solutions. Accordingly, it must be possible to
draw up the technical specifications in terms of functional performance and requirements,
and, where reference is made to the European standard or, in the absence thereof, to the
national standard, tenders based on equivalent arrangements must be considered by
contracting authorities.”
“To demonstrate equivalence, tenderers should be permitted to use any form of evidence.
Contracting authorities must be able to provide a reason for any decision that equivalence
does not exist in a given case.”
As mentioned before, Article 23, paragraph 3 specifies that technical specifications shall be
formulated either by reference to standards, or in terms of functional or performance requirements.
In addition, certain characteristics can be specified by standards and other in terms of functions and
performance. Where referring to standards, each reference shall be followed by the words “or
equivalent”.
Paragraph 4 specifies that, where a contracting authority refers to standards,
“cannot reject a tender on the grounds that the products and services tendered for do not
comply with the specifications to which it has referred, once the tenderer proves in his
tender to the satisfaction of the contracting authority, by whatever appropriate means,
that the solutions which he proposes satisfy in an equivalent manner the requirements
defined by the technical specifications.”
In paragraph 5, the inverse situation is specified. Where a contracting authority refers to functional
and performance requirements, it cannot reject a tender for products and services which comply
with standards addressing these requirements.
“In his tender, the tenderer must prove to the satisfaction of the contracting authority and
by any appropriate means that the work, product or service in compliance with the
standard meets the performance or functional requirements of the contracting authority.”
Both paragraph 4 and 5 specify that
“an appropriate means might be constituted by a technical dossier of the manufacturer or a
test report from a recognised body”.
In paragraph 7, recognised bodies are defined as
“test and calibration laboratories and certification and inspection bodies which comply with
applicable European standards.”
In addition, paragraph 7 specifies that
- 111 -
“contracting authorities shall accept certificates from recognised bodies established in

other Member States.”
The Directive does not specify very much what the contracting authority may require. Rather, it
specifies how the requirements should be formulated and what the authority must accept from the
tenderer. A technical specification may, but not must, include requirements on conformity
assessments, i.e. that compliance to requirements set out in the technical specification is verified in
the tender by means of a conformity assessment procedure.
It is not clearly stated in the Directive that a requirement set out in the technical specification must
be verified. However, it could be argued that refraining from control of compliance conflicts with the
principle of equal treatment. In addition, a decision by the EC Court (Case C-448/01 Wienstrom) lays
down that
”in order for the criterion to be acceptable, it should be susceptible of control, which would
imply that the contracting authority requires – through the production of certificates for
example – elements enabling him to control the information forwarded by the bidder in
relation to the award criteria.”
As follows from the definitions of conformity assessment in the standard ISO/IEC 17000, an
assessment can be performed either by the supplier (the first party), the customer (the second party)
or someone else (a third party).
A verification that the tender conforms to the stated requirements can always be made by the
contracting authority itself, provided that the authority has the necessary knowledge and equipment
to carry out such verification in a way that treats the tenders equally. Where the authority does not
have the adequate knowledge and equipment, it can use a consultancy service to carry out the
verification. In both cases, this is a second party attestation.
If the contracting authority does not want to carry out the verification during the evaluation of the
tenders, e.g. because it would be too time-consuming, the authority may in call-for-tender require
that the supplier provides a proof, an attestation, that a certain requirement is complied with. In the
sense of ISO/IEC 17000, the authority may require either a first party attestation, a supplier’s
declaration of conformity or a third party certification.
Where requirements on conformity assessments are specified, they shall refer to standards ”or
equivalent”, or be in terms of functions and performance.
From paragraph 4 follows that a specific conformity assessment scheme, even if it is a formal
standard, cannot be specified as mandatory. The tenderer has the option to use another method,
provided he can prove that it gives equivalent results. The CE mark is an exception. The CE mark
provides a presumption of conformity with the mandatory essential requirements of the New
Approach Directives. Therefore, when the contracting authority decides to buy a product covered by
a New Approach Directive requiring the CE marking, it does not need to specify ‘or equivalent’.
From paragraphs 4 and 5 follows that a test report from a recognised body is an allowed but not
mandatory way of proving compliance with the requirements set out in the technical specification.
The term “test report” is not defined in the Directive, but most likely an accredited third party
certificate is a valid test report. In addition, it seems to imply that a supplier’s declaration, based on
an inspection made by a recognised body, can always be presumed to be accepted by the contracting
authority. On the other hand, a first party attestation without any specification of the assessment
method is not an acceptable test report.
The Directive is not specific as regards what kind of proof a contracting authority can require. Hence,
the authority has freedom to choose proof of conformity from a first party attestation to an
accredited third party certification. Requiring verification made by a third party is allowed as long as
equivalent verifications made by bodies in other Member States are accepted (the principle of
mutual recognition). Since the Directive gives no guidance on what should be meant by an equivalent
- 112 -
verification, each contracting authority must elaborate its own interpretation in order to ensure that
the principle of equal treatment is followed.
The extended use of electronic procurement means that conformity attestations (primarily pre-
market attestations), including attestations on accessibility, should be able to be stored and
submitted electronically. Work is in progress on designing approaches on how to handle certificates,
declarations of conformity and other documents electronically.
It could be noted that different standards define accessibility and usability differently. The standard
under development, ISO DIS 21542, Building construction — Accessibility and usability of the built
environment, defines accessibility as follows:
(accessibility) “means that people, regardless of disability, age or gender, are able to gain access
to buildings or part of buildings, into them, within them and exit from them”
NOTE Accessibility includes ease of independent approach, entry, evacuation and/or use of a building
and its services and facilities, by all of the building's potential users - with an assurance of individual
health, safety and welfare during the course of those activities.”
It defines usability as “characteristic of the built environment whose degrees of convenience and risk
in use can be determined by measurement or other agreed means”
On the other hand, standards on interactive systems, e.g. ISO 9241-20 Accessibility guidelines for
information/communication technology (ICT) equipment and services, define accessibility as
“usability of a product, service, environment or facility by people with the widest range of
capabilities”. It defines usability as “extent to which a product can be used by specified users to
achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use”.
4.6.4 Specific legislation on procurements in the domain of the built environment
The Directive distinguishes between numbers of contract types:
“Public works contracts” are public contracts having as their object either the execution, or both
the design and execution, of building or civil engineering works.
“Public supply contracts” are public contracts other than public works contracts having as their
object the purchase or rental of products.
“Public service contracts” are public contracts other than public works or supply contracts having
as their object the provision of services.
4.6.4.1 Public works contracts
The Directive defines “public works contracts” as
“public contracts having as their object either the execution, or both the design and
execution, of works related to one of the activities within the meaning of Annex I or a work,
or the realization, by whatever means, of a work corresponding to the requirements
specified by the contracting authority. A “work” means the outcome of building or civil
engineering works taken as a whole which is sufficient of itself to fulfil an economic or
technical function.”
Annex I is a list of services. Examples are
Construction of new buildings
Construction of civil engineering constructions, such as bridges, tunnels, pipelines
Construction of highways, roads, airfields and sports facilities
Installation of electrical wiring and fittings
Plumbing
- 113 -
Floor and wall covering

Painting and glazing
Etc.
It should be noted that architectural and engineering activities, as well as project management for
construction, are not included in public works. They are "public service contracts"10.
In addition, the Directive regulates a specific procedure of relevance for this project: “Design
contests” means
“those procedures which enable the contracting authority to acquire, mainly in the fields of
town and country planning, architecture and engineering or data processing, a plan or
design selected by a jury after being put out to competition with or without the award of
prizes.”
Apart from the thresholds, there are only minor differences in procedures for public works contracts
and other service contracts. However, Article 34 regulates a specific type of public works contract:
particular rules on subsidized housing schemes.
Recital 9 of the preamble of the Directive sets out that
“In view of the diversity of public works contracts, contracting authorities should be able to
make provision for contracts for the design and execution of work to be awarded either
separately or jointly. It is not the intention of this Directive to prescribe either joint or
separate contract awards. The decision to award contracts separately or jointly must be
determined by qualitative and economic criteria, which may be defined by national law.”
Article 16 contains an important exclusion from the Directive:
“This Directive shall not apply to public service contracts for:
(a) the acquisition or rental, by whatever financial means, of land, existing buildings or
other immovable property or concerning rights thereon; nevertheless, financial service
contracts concluded at the same time as, before or after the contract of acquisition or
rental, in whatever form, shall be subject to this Directive;”
When a public entity looks for new premises to hire, for example office premises for people engaged
to work in a temporary project, it may have to ensure due to national legislation, that these premises
are accessible for employees and visitors. Such rental is subject to national procurement legislation.
However, temporary rebuilding to accommodate disabled employees is a public works contract.
4.6.4.2 Different types of procurements for the built environment
4.6.4.2.1 Construction products
For requirements on construction products as well as conformity assessment, the Construction
Products Directive (89/106/EC) applies.
Construction products may only be placed on the market if they are fit for their intended use. In this
regard, they must be such that works in which they are incorporated satisfy, for an economically
reasonable working life, the essential requirements with regard to mechanical strength and stability,
safety in the event of fire, hygiene, health and the environment, safety in use, protection against
noise and energy economy and heat retention.
The essential requirements are defined in the first instance in interpretative documents drawn up by
technical committees and are then elaborated further in the form of technical specifications. The
latter may consist of either harmonised European or European technical approvals.
10
See Annex II, Category 12, in Directive 2004/18/EC.
- 114 -
Where neither a European standard nor guidelines for European technical approval yet exist,
construction products may continue to be assessed and marketed in accordance with existing
national provisions conforming to the essential requirements.
It is up to the manufacturers or their representatives established in the Community to attest, either
on the basis of their own resources or through an approved certification body, that their products
conform to the requirements of a technical specification in keeping with the attestation of
conformity procedures set out in the Directive.
Accessibility is not an essential requirement in the sense of the Directive. The Directive does not
regulate accessibility in any way. This implies that it does not impose any particular freedom or
restrictions to public procurers of construction products with respect to accessibility, compared with
other products.
4.6.4.2.2 Design services
Procurement of design services apply to projects where the customer/employer wishes to keep the
design phase and construction phase apart. This may apply to e.g. rebuilding of existing buildings or
facilities or to the design of new buildings or facilities. Accessibility requirements can be stated upon
The designer (company), its technical and professional ability (which can be verified within
the procurement).
The subject-matter of the procurement, i.e. the design service as such.
The object to be designed. Functional and technical accessibility requirements can be stated
for the object to be designed. The realization of these requirements appears in the result of
the design process, i.e. the design. They can however not be verified within the
procurement, since they are not award criteria.
A distinction should be made between procurement of design services and procurement of design.
For the latter, which is assumed to be exceptional (apart from design contests, see below), the result
of a design process is the subject-matter of the procurement and hence submitted in the tender. In
that case, accessibility requirements can and must be verified within the procurement.
4.6.4.2.3 Construction services
Procurement of construction services relate to projects where the design is carried out directly by
the customer/employer or by specialist consultants engaged directly by the customer/employer.
That design forms the basis for the tender for construction. Accessibility requirements can be stated
upon:
The constructor (company), its technical and professional ability (which can be verified within
the procurement).
The subject-matter of the procurement, i.e. the construction service as such.
The object to be built. Here, the accessibility requirements must be included in the design
specification, which is a part of the call-for-tender but is not a basis for awarding of contract.
In other words, the accessibility of the object to be built is in its entirety determined in the
design specification, and the procurement process does not have any impact. The
procurement officer should not add, delete or change requirements on the object. The
verification that the appropriate accessibility requirements are stated takes place during the
design phase (before the procurement). Verification that the object to be built complies with
the accessibility requirements in the design specification takes places during the building
control process, i.e. after the procurement process is finalized.
4.6.4.2.4 Design + construction services
This is a project where one and the same contractor takes responsibility for both design and
construction of the facility in accordance with specifications set out by the contracting authority. In
the call-for-tender the employer describes the functions and qualities of the intended facility. The
- 115 -
tenders should contain a design proposal enabling the employer to assess whether the requirements
and recommendations can be fulfilled. The selected tenderer (the contractor) develops the detailed
drawings and descriptions of the facility.
Accessibility could be included in the described functions and qualities, however not in detail, since
the tenderer is supposed to submit an outlined proposal, not a detailed specification. Consequently,
the fulfillment of the accessibility requirements can and shall be evaluated as part of the
procurement process. As in procurement of separate design and construction services, assessment of
the compliance with detailed accessibility requirements takes place in the building control process.
In addition, accessibility requirements may be stated upon
The contractor (company), its technical and professional ability in relation to both design and
construction (which can be verified within the procurement).
The subject-matter of the procurement, i.e. the construction service as such.
4.6.4.2.5 Design + construction + operation and maintenance services

This is a project resulting in a long-term contract, where one and the same contractor takes
responsibility not only for design and construction of the facility, but also for operation and
maintenance. For accessibility, this type of project is equivalent to design + construction
procurements. For the operation and maintenance, the contractor must be able to ensure that the
accessibility is preserved throughout the contract time.
4.6.4.2.6 Design contests
The Directive defines a design contest as
“those procedures which enable the contracting authority to acquire, mainly in the fields of
town and country planning, architecture and engineering or data processing, a plan or
design selected by a jury after being put out to competition with or without the award of
prizes.”
“The jury shall be composed exclusively of natural persons who are independent of
participants in the contest.”
Provisions for design contests are set out in articles 66-74 of the Directive. Design contests can be
organized either as part of a procedure leading to the award of a public service contract, or result in
prizes and/or payments to participants.
Design contests can be applied for any kind of service. There is no limitation to the domain of the
built environment.It follows from the text of the Directive that a design contest can be a part of a
procurement of design + build services.
Clearly, accessibility of the object to be designed can be an award criterion for selecting the winner
of a design contest.
4.6.4.2.7 Consultancy services
Procurements of technical consulting in any domain, including the built environment, are public
service contracts and should follow the ordinary provisions of the Directive.
Services in the domain of the built environment are, for example, architectural services, conformity
assessment services, engineering services, urban planning services and technical experts on
accessibility. It is to be noted that accessibility can be a qualification criterion both for the
consultancy company and for its staff, provided that accessibility is linked to the subject-matter of
the procurement. As pointed out in section B.6.2.2, criteria concerning the company in general can
only be used as qualification criteria. On the other hand, skills and education of those consultants
- 116 -
who are named in the tender and appointed as those who are actually intended to carry out the
work can be used as award criteria.
4.7 Conclusions and recommendations
4.7.1 Conclusions
An outcome of the analysis of conformity assessment schemes in European Member States shows
that
Limited or no Conformity Assessment is being applied to the early procurement phases of
construction projects such as brief development, site selection and appointment of design
and construction teams
Conformity Assessment is mainly limited to building control activities at various stages during
the design and construction stages by Building Control Authorities (BCAs)
Self assessment of conformity is increasingly being used
There is very limited Conformity Assessment of buildings and environments in use
Existing building inspection activities are in place in all states – the coverage of BCA
inspections may differ a lot from state to state as well as within states
Few countries have formal training procedures in place or assess the competences of those
charged with carrying out conformity assessment.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, some European Member States report significant outcomes
regarding the accessibility of the built environment as a direct result of the implementation of the
requirements of Anti-Discrimination, Rights based or Equality Acts.
The functional accessibility requirements arising from the obligations under the UN Convention on
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities appear principally to be having an impact on the services
provided to disabled people and not on the building works process (planning, construction works and
completion).
Further outcomes that were highlighted in the reports from several different countries were that:
Attestation of conformity to an accessibility standard does not guarantee that the object is
fully accessible.
The most crucial element of a conformity assessment scheme is the normative document specifying
the requirements. The accessibility of an object is determined by the requirements, not by the
procedure for demonstrating that the requirements are fulfilled. Furthermore, the demonstration
applies only to the specifiedrequirements, nothing else. For elements of the built environment, many
design solutions and constructions may well conform to functional and technical requirements
specified in a standard, without being good solutions.
Accessibility should be mainstreamed into existing business processes.
Accessibility is one of many required desirable qualities of elements of the built environment. The
market players (developers, procurers, designers, builders etc.) all have their established business
models, business processes, work methods, sourcing strategies, procurement strategies etc. They
want to manage accessibility in the same way as they manage other qualities, e.g. the essential
requirements laid down in the construction directive. Hence, accessibility should be incorporated
into existing processes, not added onto those processes. This is an application of the mainstreaming
strategy.
Accessibility standards and conformity assessment schemes to be produced must take a wide
diversity of procurement approaches into account.
- 117 -
The project teams have not within the timeframe of the project been able to study in any detail the
prevailing procurement strategies applied by public entities in the Member States. The project teams
are aware that there is a great diversity of approaches among public entities, depending on size,
organization, geographical structure, building industry structure etc. In addition, the project teams
believe that this diversity is less dependent on countries and more on the type and size of entity
doing the procuring. Some public entities are big urban cities, some are small rural municipalities.
The latter seldom have in-house competencies on e.g. ground investigation, design or construction.
They can be expected to procure consultancy services to a greater extent than big cities.
Furthermore, for small municipalities most contracts on public works will fall below the threshold
amount, where the national procurement legislation (if any) will apply. The toolkit to be produced in
phase II has to take this diversity into account.
An important finding in relation to construction products:
Very few standards for construction products covered by the former CPD include any
requirements regarding accessibility and usability
As of 9 March 2011, a new regulation for construction products was approved by the EU, and
accessibility was included as a basic requirement for construction works.
Greater conformity assessment of products such as electronic and IT equipment, intercoms,
alarms, public address systems etc may have a significant impact on the accessibility of
buildings and environments in particular for people with sensory and learning impairments
How the added basic requirement “accessibility” will be further explained within ‘essential
characteristics’ and its influence on European standardisation is now under development.
More information will be included after the Open Meeting and with support from EC DG
ENTR. The report includes an overview which CEN/TCs are concerned and should implement
accessibility requirements within their standards.
Conformity assessment is not just an appendix to a set of requirements. Making conformity
assessment possible and clear is rooted in the very formulation of the basic requirements. Many
documents examined, however, either lack precision in their requirements, or make them far too
prescriptive, possibly leading to very different interpretations by notified bodies or certifiers.
Documents and schemes should take into account the complexity of many building projects as well
as the application of requirements to existing building and should allow for flexibility in their use,
application and assessment. The phase II toolkit should assist in this.
If a new European accessibility standard is to make life easier to the procurer and project manager,
then:
Direct links to each stage of the building process are essential, particularly in the conformity
assessment part. Avoiding costly mistakes means checking for conformity in time, at the right
stage, and if the standard itself does not provide for this, then the toolkit could. As many
building regulations leave it to the project manager to guess at which stage to highlight
critical aspects, a phase II toolkit delivering the backbone of the what and when questions
would be welcomed.
A toolkit that offered free-of-charge, open format word processing or spreadsheet
documents, digitally storable on projects, in editable checklist form, with direct inclusion of
all requirements from the basic accessibility standards could be a useful down-to-earth
instrument for all stakeholders in procurement, from design to final assessment stages.
If designed correctly these kinds of checklists would be highly usable in any scenario for phase II, be
they based on self-assessment or third party assessment. Some countries and municipalities do offer
basic online tools, but they are seldom designed for dynamic use, digital building permit applications
or first or third party assessment purposes. Consequently, in the majority of construction projects
each and every organization, consultant or individual has to develop homemade tools, and this in
- 118 -
itself represents an obstacle to quality management and control. The toolkit in phase II could be a
source of these simple, but more supportive documents.
A detailed assessment standard or toolkit does not make sense without a matching
accessibility standard, written with assessment in mind
Development of the two basic European standards therefore is a prerequisite for successful
conformity assessment on a common European basis
Detailed EN accessibility standards are indispensible, too, for determining construction
products accessibility requirements, as these in general will have to be derived from the EN
built environment standards.
Figure 6 – Tools and stages to be linked

Even though philosophies on accessibility and universal design seem to be converging in EU, capacity
building programs that can relate to common EU standards and a toolkit would
make assessment much easier for the procurers, project managers and consultants
help establish a common knowledge basis in the EU for procurers, consultants and
professionals
form the basis for a common approach to assessment and procedures
It has hitherto been assumed that the mandate 376 Toolkit should form the basis for a similar
Mandate 420 version, but this is not entirely recommendable, as
Procurement of buildings by its nature is different from procuring products.
Most of the toolkits recommended in M 376 do not deliver editable formats
Development of the toolkits should not necessarily be split in two, but at least should be developed
in parallel and shaped to fit their individual purposes. For the longer term and dynamic process of
building projects with collaboration between many partners and colleagues editable documents
should be provided.
To assist the procurer the toolkit ideally would
provide links to the different national building regulations, as these in many cases override
an EN standard and vice versa, and full knowledge of what to assess against is not always
clear, even to professionals.
In addition the standards will be useful for a European framework providing what the UN Convention
asks for as a minimum level of accessibility for the EU. In the case of construction products, this
framework is already provided by the new CPR that also offers the advantage of being adopted in
national legislation without any modification.
4.7.2 Recommendations
This part of the report primarily includes proposals that refer to the aspects related to conformity
assessment of accessibility to the built environment. In order to understand team B’s
recommendations it is essential to take into consideration the standard(s) regarding functional
and/or technical accessibility requirements that is/are the outcome of team A’s proposals.
- 119 -
The functional and technical requirements regarding accessibility are the objects of conformity that
will be assessed in a conformity assessment scheme for accessibility. Another key element
fundamental to an effective conformity assessment scheme is the competence of the personnel, due
to nature of the activities to be performed. All activities included in any conformity assessment
scheme are services and the quality of any service is mainly based on the competence of the
personnel.
In this framework, the team B recommendations as outcome of phase I of the Mandate 420 are the
development of:
1. A European standardisation document describing the conformity assessment requirements
in relation tothe activities, roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders (designers,
architects, inspectors, consultants, construction companies, surveillance bodies and clients)
and objective evidence associated with these (accessibility statements, inspection reports
etc). This document has to be closely linked to the standard(s) with functional and/or
technical requirements for accessibility, to ensure the presumption of conformity with
accessibility requirements
2. A European standardisation document (technical specification, technical report or a CEN
Workshop Agreement (CWA)) that describes the competence of the personnel involved in
conformity assessment activities for accessibility of the built environment. In this regard
there is a precedent in CEN standardisation where a CWA is under preparation 'Curriculum
for training professionals in Universal Design'.
A toolkit for the use of standardisers to promote the accessibility requirements in the
relevant standards both for construction products and for services related to built
environments; this should take particular account of the requirements of the Guide CEN 6
or Guide ISO 71 and any related standards.
3. European standards for construction products that include explicitly those characteristics
relevant for the accessibility requirements and ways to demonstrate the conformity of
these (annex similar to CE marking)
4. A toolkit for the use of procurers, involved in the public procurement of the built
environment; this toolkit has to provide information regarding:
a. The two EU Accessibility Standards
i. Standard relating to functional requirements of specified user groups,
ii. Standard relating to technical specifications to meet the functional
requirement
b. National legislation referring to accessibility (based on the Inventory collected by
Project Team A, and continually updated),
c. EU Directives referring to accessibility of the built environment,
d. A European standardisation document that refers to the conformity assessment
scheme for accessibility
e. Meanings of presumption of conformity with accessibility requirements and the
related objective evidences
f. Documents which assist with the technical issues of assessing compliance with the
requirements in the accessibility standard, including existing buildings, heritage sites
etc.
g. A short introduction to the philosophy of Design for All / Universal Design and
description of the diverse user groups,
- 120 -
h. National /international accessibility guidelines in common use (based on the

Inventory collected by Project Team A, and continually updated),
i. National / International examples of Good Practice in Accessible Built Environments
- 121 -
5 Bibliography
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CEN 207 Bibliography
CODE
ESTIMATE ON POTENTIAL SUITABILITY IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
As technical As guidance
specification for different
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
INVENTORY and criteria for levels of
DOCUMENT NAME (and link) Comments
ABBREVIATION awarding adapting
public existing
contracts buildings
h=high; h=high;
x=yes
x=yes
x=yes
x=yes
x=yes
x=yes
x=yes
x=yes
m=medium; m=medium;
l=low l=low
No of each type
114 82
126
125
High
40
36
58
58
52
74
63 58 Medium
70 72 Low
EUROPEAN EUROPEAN
STANDARDS - STANDARDS -
UNIVERSAL UNIVERSAL
EUROPEAN EUROPEAN
ISO ISO International Organization for Contains balanced set of requirements and recommendations, plus an
Standardization (28 February 2010), extra level for adapting of existing buildings
BS ISO 21542 "Building construction
x x h h
- Accessibility and usability of built
environment", Draft for
Consultation.
EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN
(EU) MEMBER UNION (EU)
COUNTRIES MEMBER
COUNTRIES
AUSTRIA AUSTRIA
B-VG Österreische Bundesverfassung Art. Art.7, Abs. 1 since 1997: “Nobody shall be discriminated due to his
7 Abs. 1 / Austrian Federal disability. The Republic (Federation, countries, municipalities and
l l
Constitution (www.ris.bka.gv.at) villages) commits themselves to ensure the equal treatment of disabled
and non-disabled persons in all spheres of every day life.”
BGStG Austrian Equal Treatment Law - Strong reference on ÖNORM B 1600 included
Bundes-Behinderten-
x x l l
Gleichstellungs-Gesetz BGStG 2006
(www.ris.bka.gv.at)
ASchG ArbeitnehmerInnenschutzgesetz (5) Workplaces in buildings have to be accessible if required. Especially
x x l l
(www.ris.bka.gv.at) exits and entrances, horizontal and vertical circulation, doors and
- 122 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
sanitary rooms which can be used by disabled employees.
AStV Arbeitsstättenverordnung § 15. (1) When employees with mobility impairments are employed, the
(Workplace Regulation) work place has to be adapted ... if necessary.
http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeF l l
assung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnorme
n&Gesetzesnummer=10009098
BEinstG, Federal law on equal treatment of Premises with more than 25 persons have to employ at least one
persons with disabilities on the disabled person per 25. If they fulfill not this obligation they have to pay
work-place, Behinderten- a balance tax of 230 €/month/person. § 7b. (1) In connection with a
x l l
Einstellungsgesetz 2010 service relationship (…) as well as in the work environment in general
(...) no one shall be discriminated against either directly or indirectly
because of disability.
BVergG Bundesvergabegesetz2006 (Public § 87. (1) Tender documents have to refer to the corresponding
Procurement Law) regulations, standards concerning barrier free building. (...) (3) Par. 1
http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeF l l also applies to tender offers for the design and development of annex
assung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnorme and alteration of buildings and parts of buildings, as far as the total
n&Gesetzesnummer=20004547 costs do not rise disproportionally and an adequate necessity is given.
RVS 03.02.12 RVS-Richtlinie 03.02.12
Fußgängerverkehr (RVS-Guideline
03.02.12 Pedestrian traffic)
x x h m
www.fsv.at
(Forschungsgemeinschaft Straße und
Verkehr)
RVS 02.02.36 RVS-Richtlinie RVS 02.02.36 - Very new guideline - will be published in 1-2 months.
Alltagsgerechter barrierefreier
Straßenraum / RVS-Guideline
02.02.36 - Guideline for accessible
x x h h
public space for everyday-life
(www.fsv.at)
(Forschungsgemeinschaft Straße und
Verkehr)
B-PT Leitfaden für barrierefreien mainly for accessible public transport: bus and tram stations
Öffentlichen Verkehr- x x h m
Anforderungen an barrierefreie Bus-
- 123 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
und Straßenbahnhaltestellen /
Guideline for barrier free public
transport - Requirements for barrier
free bus- and tramway stations
http://www.bmvit.gv.at/verkehr/ges
amtverkehr/barrierefreiheit/downlo
ads/leitfaden_haltestellen.pdf
B-IS Barrierefreie Infrastruktur - Guideline for the design of barrier free railway infrastructure (Official
Planungsrichtlinie (Barrier free Notification of the Federal Ministry of Traffic, Innovation and
infrastructure - Designguideline), Technology). Note: ÖBB (Austian Federal Railway) has always had its
ÖBB 2003/06 x x h m own regulations on building and is not subject to general building
http://www.kremser.wonne.cc/oeb regulations. A notification (Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and
b/oebb-dokumente/2_barrierefreie- Youth) from the 1980es regulates the observation of ÖNORM B 1600 by
infrastruktur.pdf every federal authority is obligatorily.
OIB HC OIB Harmonisation Concept, clause 4 The OIB Harmonisation concept has been developed for the 6 essential
"Safety in use and accessibility" requirements for building construction as in the EU-Building Products
(Zielorientierte Bautechnische Directive used but further improved while they are including
Anforderungen, 4. 'accessibility'. Contains also a list of buildings which have to be designed
x x h l
Nutzungssicherheit und accessible. These OI B-Guidelines have been developed for
Barrierefreiheit) www.oib.or.at implementation within the 9 federal building regulations in Austria. The
list of different use of buildings is more or less in line with the UN
Convention.
OIB Guideline 4 OIB-Richtlinie 4 "Nutzungssicherheit Referencing to the main accessibility requirements clauses of ÖNORM B
und Barrierefreiheit" / OIB-Guideline 1600. This Guide has been developed for implementation within the 9
4 "Safety in use and accessibility" different building regulations in Austria.Higher accessibility
(including reference to ÖNORM B x x h l requirements can stay in the relevant building regulation. Due to the
1600) www.oib.or.at fact that 6 from 9 countries have already incorporated the OIB
Guideline 4 in their building regulation I have used in the Inventory only
the reference to Vienna Building Code and regulation.
B-BauVO Burgenländische Bauverordnung OIB Guideline 4 incorporated.
2008 BauVO, LGBL. Nr. 63/2008 x x h l
www.bauordnung.at
K-BauVO Kärntner Bauvorschriften 16.04.2008 x x m l
NOEBTV Niederösterr. Bautechnikverordnung x x x x l l
- 124 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
1996 (revision 2007)
www.bauordnung.at
OOE BTV Oberösterreichische
x x x m l
Bautechnikverordnung 1999
OOE BauTG Oberösterreichisches OIB Guideline 4 incorporated.
Bautechnikgesetz 19.04.2008 x x x h l
www.bauordnung.at
S-BauTG Salzburger Bautechnikgesetz
x x l l
24.03.2009
Stmk. BauG Steiermärkisches Baugesetz OIB Guideline 4 before incorporation.
x x h l
21.08.2008 www.bauordnung.at
T-TBauV Tiroler Technische Bauvorschriften, OIB Guideline 4 incorporated.
x x h l
19.04.2008 www.bauordnung.at
T-BO Tiroler Bauordnung, 29.09.2008
x x h l
www.baurdnung.at
V-BauTVO Vorarlberg - Verordnung über die OIB Guideline 4 incorporated.
technischen Erfordernissen von
x x h l
Bauwerken, 23.04.2009
www.bauordnung.at
WBTV Wiener Bautechnikverordnung OIB Guideline 4 incorporated. All buildings with habitable rooms (all
WBTV, 07.09.2008 x x h m offices, > 2 flats etc.) have to be built accessible.
www.bauordnung.at
W-BO Wiener Bauordnung (Techniknovelle OIB Guideline 4 is incorporated. All buildings with habitable rooms
2007) 11.04.2008 (except single family houses, houses for 2 families, row-houses) have to
be built accessible. Architects have to confirm in the building permit
proceedings that they have considered in their design all
accessibilityrequirements. At the completion announcement a final
x x h m statement has to be given by the architect or by a civil engineer that
the execution has been done according accessibility requirements
(based on ÖNORM B 1600 as state of the art). Due to the liberalisation
of the building regulation no further building controls are applied for
private builders. Only in the responsibility of the City of Vienna if they
act as a building owner the building authority act as controllers.
ÖNORM A 3012 Visual guiding systems public x x h h
- 125 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
information - Orientation supported
by directional arrows, graphic
symbols, text, light and colour
(www.as-institute.at)
ÖNORM B 1600 Building without barriers - Design First publication of this accessibility standard in 1977. In the new revised
principles www.as-institute.at x x h h version - will be published 2011-04-01 an own chapter for existing
buildings is incorporated.
ÖNORM B 1601 Special buildings for handicapped This standard can be applied for special buildings used by disabled
and old persons - Design principles persons as medicine practices, elderly homes, special houses for
x x h m
www.as-institute.at disabled persons, hospitals, wokplaces for persons with disabilities,
senior homes etc.
ÖNORM B 1602 Barrier free buildings for teaching ÖNORM B 1602 has to be applied together with ÖNORM B 1600 which
and training and possible is the basic standard.
x x h m
accompanying facilities (www.as-
institute.at)
ÖNORM B 1603 Barrier free buildings for tourism - ÖNORM B 1603 has to be applied together with ÖNORM B 1600 which
Design principles (www.as- x x h m is the basic standard.
institute.at)
ÖNORM EN 81- Safety rules for the construction and All new lifts and lifts under refurbishment are usually constructed
70 installation of lifts - Particular according ÖNORM EN 81-70. In Vienna and Austria the focus is laid
applications for passenger and good more on requirements for people with mobility impairment. Indution
passengers lifts - Part 70: loop system is very seldom executed.
x x h h
Accessibility to lifts for persons
including persons with disabiity
(consolidated version) (www.as-
institute.at)
ÖNORM CEN/TS Taktile Bodenindikatoren gefertigt This document is not really a standard: all relevant systems within
x x m m
15209 aus Beton, Ton oder Stein Europe are therein listed.
ÖNORM V 2100 Technical aids for visually impaired
and blind persons - Tactile
x x h h
references on control panels for
pedestrians (www.as-institute.at)
ÖNORM V 2100 Technical aids for visually impaired
x x h h
and blind persons - Tactile
- 126 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
references on control panels for
pedestrians (www.as-institute.at)
ÖNORM V 2102- Technical aids for visually impaired Applied in all streets in Vienna. Several pilot projects in different places
1 and blind persons - Tactile ground of the City under test with disabled persons for further development
surface indicators - Part 1: For and improvements in public spaces.
x x h h
pavements in buildings and in the
public area at speeds not higher
than 80 km/h (www.as-institute.at)
ÖNORM V 2104 Technical aids for blind, visually and Obligatorily required for the safety of all construction sites in the City of
mobility impaired persons - Safety Vienna. Special Information leaflet for Safety of construction sites in
devices for construction and Vienna with reference to accessibility requirements for disabled
dangerous sites (www.as- persons.
institute.at) and
http://www.wien.gv.at/verkehr/bau x x h h
stellen/absicherung.html and
information about 'Safety for
Vienna's construction sites' in
http://www.wien.gv.at/verkehr/org
anisation/pdf/baustellen.pdf
ÖNORM B 8115- Sound insulation and architectural Referenced within ÖNORM B 1600
3 acoustics in building construction - x x
Part 3: Architectural acoustics
DFA Barriere:Frei!' - Handbuch für Several checklists included for entrances, living rooms, sanitary rooms,
barrierefreies Wohnen / Handbook sleeping rooms, kitchen etc. Most requirements from ÖNORM B 1600
for accessible living, are included - especially concerned housing
www.designforall.at and Federal
x x h h
Ministry of Social Affairs, Works and
Consumer Protection
www.bmask.gv.at (free download
and brochure order)
G-BB Planungsgrundlagen Barrierefreies All requirements from ÖNORM B 1600 are included
Bauen - Barrier free buildings, Graz
x x h h
handbook:
http://www.graz.at/cms/beitrag/10
- 127 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
027121/421952 (free download)
G-Swim Schwimmbecken für ALLE Menschen Based on ÖNORM B 1600 and ÖNORM B 1603 requirements.
/ Swimming facilities for All:
Information leaflet published by the
construction building authority of
Graz, Accessibility of the built
x x m l
environment/ Consulting
department for persons with
disabilities
(http://www.graz.at/cms/beitrag/10
027270/421952/)
G-AH Anpassbarer Wohnbau / Adaptable Based on ÖNORM B 1600 requirements
Housing: Information leaflet - Graz
x x m m
027270/421952/)
G-FP Selbstrettung für alle Menschen -
Barrierefreier Brandschutz / Self-
Evacuation for All - Accessible Fire
x x m l
Protection: Information leaflet -
Graz(http://www.graz.at/cms/beitra
g/10027270/421952/)
Net-WC Öffentliche WC-Anlagen / Accessible These information leaflets from the Austrian Network of Access
public toilet - Information leaflet Consultant support architects and plumbers etc. who are working on
from the Austrian Network of Access the site. They are very easy to read and understand.
Consultants x x m l
027270/421952/ and
www.oear.or.at)
Net-Lift Aufzüge / Lifts - Information leaflet These information leaflets from the Austrian Network of Access
from the Austrian Network of Access Consultant support architects and plumbers etc. who are working on
Consultants the site. They are very easy to read and understand.
x x m l
027270/421952/ and
www.oear.or.at)
- 128 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
Net-Plattf Schrägaufzüge und Hebebühnen / These information leaflets from the Austrian Network of Access
Inclined and vertical platform lifts - Consultant support architects and plumbers etc. who are working on
Information leaflet from the the site. They are very easy to read and understand.
Austrian Network of Access
x x m l
Consultants
027270/421952/ and
www.oear.or.at)
Net-Play Spielplätze für alle / Playground for These information leaflets from the Austrian Network of Access
All: - Information leaflet from the Consultant support architects and plumbers etc. who are working on
Austrian Network of Access the site. They are very easy to read and understand.
Consultants x x m l
027270/421952/ and
www.oear.or.at)
S-BB Salzburg: Planungsgrundlagen und
Praxisbeispiele - Text mit x x h l
Zeichnungen
BELGIUM
AD Toegankelijkheidsadvies gegeven Specific advice on one building, given by a specialist on accessibility, for
door een adviesbureau h h making new and existing builings more accessible
toegankelijkheid in Vlaanderen x x
ADW Wet van 10 mei 2007 ter bestrijding The regulation for adapting existing workplaces for people with
van bepaalde vormen van disabilities
discriminatie (BS 30 V 07) - artikel 4
l m
redelijke aanpassingen van de
arbeidspost voor personen met een
beperking
BN Braillenormen - brailleliga - Guidelines for adjusting buildings for visually impaired people
http://www.brailleliga.be/nl/docum l m
entatie/andere/default.asp x
DS Dossiersamenstelling: 16, 2°, c) zo This determines the file composition of a building license
het een geheel of deels voor het h h
publiek toegankelijk gebouw betreft,
- 129 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
een beschrijving van de al dan niet
vergunningsplichtige voorzieningen
om integrale toegankelijkheid te
bereiken voor de personen met
verminderde beweeglijkheid. Hierbij
wordt bijzondere aandacht besteed
aan die voorzieningen die verder
gaan dan de wettelijk vastgelegde
normen; + ART. 16 13° een
mobiliteitsstudie
DTAH BS 08/5/2009 - 20 MAART 2009 Regulation on accessibility for guide-dogs
Decreet houdende de
toegankelijkheid van publieke l l
plaatsen voor personen met een
assistentiehond
EN 81-70 EN 81-70:2003 Veiligheidsregels European safety-rules for elevators including accessibility of elevators
voor het vervaardigen en het for people with disabilities,
aanbrengen van liften — Bijzondere
toepassingen voor personenliften en
m l
personen-goederenliften — Deel 70:
Toegankelijkheid van liften voor
personen inclusief personen met
een handicap | 6.8.2005 x x
FED75 Federale wet van 17 juli 1975 This federal regulation (Belgium) has been replaced by a regulation on
betreffende de toegang van the level of a region (Flanders)
gehandicapten tot gebouwen l l
toegankelijk voor het publiek.
(KB van 9 mei 1977)
GSV Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering van The regulation on accessibility at the level of a region (Flanders)
5 juni 2009 tot
vaststelling van een gewestelijke h h
stedenbouwkundige verordening
betreffende toegankelijkheid x x
HBTPG Handboek Toegankelijkheid publieke x x l h Guidelines for accessible public buildings
- 130 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
gebouwen
MGW Ontwerpgids Levenslang Wonen Guidelines for lifetime housing
(1999) en ontwerpgids l h
Meegroeiwonen (2009) x x
MOPPMH Ministeriële omzendbrief van 3 april Regulation on parking for people with disabilities
2001 betreffende het voorbehouden
h l
van parkeerplaatsen voor personen
met een handicap. (B.S. 05.05.2001)
NBN ISO/TR9527 Geregistreerde Belgische technisch Designstandards wich are dated.
rapport NBN ISO/TR9527:1994 -
Ontwerprichtlijnen. x x
RBLL Richtlijnen voor de aanpassing van Guidelines for adjusting buildings for visually impaired people
gebouwen voor visueel
gehandicapten, Blindenzorg Licht en
l m
Liefde -
http://www.blindenzorglichtenliefde
.be/801_TG.HTM x
TB Digitale toegankelijkheidsbrochure - Guidelines for adjusting buildings for visually impaired people
http://www.blindenzorglichtenliefde l m
.be/toegbrochure/index.htm x
TOEVL Premie uitgereikt door toerisme Financial support for accessible touristic accommodations
vlaanderen voor toegankelijke l m
toeristische accommodaties x x
TVWTCB WTCB-Dossiers – Katern nr. 6 – 4e Technical support on a few themes on accessibility of buildings, external
trimester 2004 - Toegankelijkheid joinery, and evacuation of people with disabilities. Main part of the
van trappen documents give a brief overview of existing regulations, standard, …
Randbemerkingen bij
§ 2.4.2 van TV 198 + WTCB-Dossiers
– Katern nr. 2 – 2e l m
trimester 2005 - Veiligheid en
toeganke-
lijkheid van gebouwen + WTCB-
Dossiers – Nr. 4/2006 – Katern nr. 4
– Toegankelijkheid van x x
- 131 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
buitenschrijnwerk
(deel 1) + WTCB-Dossiers – Nr.
1/2007 – Katern nr. 12 -
Toegankelijkheid van
buitenschrijnwerk
(deel 2) + WTCB-Dossiers – Nr.
1/2007 – Katern nr. 8 - Evacuatie van
personen met beperkte
mobiliteit bij brand
VADF Vademecum Fietsvoorzieningen Guidelines for bicyclefascilities
dateert van 2002, herzien in 2006 en
2008, m l
http://www.mobielvlaanderen.be/v
ademecums/vademecumfiets01.php x x
VADTPD Vademecum ‘Toegankelijk Publiek Guidelines on accessibility of public domain
h l
Domein’ x x
VADV VADEMECUM Guidelines for pedestrian fascilities
VOETGANGERSVOORZIENINGEN
2003
m l
http://www.mobielvlaanderen.be/v
ademecums/vademecumvoetganger
01.php x x
VCRO Vlaamse Codex Ruimtelijke Ordening This is the base of planning in Flanders.
(decreet van 16 juli 2010 (B.S.
9/8/2010)): Art. 2.3.1. De Vlaamse
Regering kan gewestelijke
stedenbouwkundige verordeningen
vaststellen voor een deel van of voor
h h
het hele gewest. Die verordeningen
bevatten de nodige
stedenbouwkundige voorschriften
om te zorgen voor: de toegang voor
personen met een functiebeperking
tot al dan niet bebouwde
- 132 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
onroerende goederen of delen ervan
toegankelijk voor het publiek, tot
installaties en wegen,
VD besluit van de Vlaamse regering van Building code for roads for pedestrians
29 april 1997 houdende vaststelling
van een algemene bouwverordening
inzake wegen voor h l
voetgangersverkeer
(Voetgangersdecreet)
bvr 29/4/1997 b.s. 7/5/1997 x x
WENK 15 Wenkenbladen toegankelijkheid - Guidelines for accessibility for several buidlingtypes, public domain,…
example:
l h
http://www.entervzw.be/assets/file
s/Hogescholen.pdf x x
ZS De zilveren sleutel x x l h Guidelines for living for the elderly
CWATUPE Code wallon de l'aménaement du
territoire, urbanisme, patrimoine et
de l'énergie x x x x m h
http://mrw.wallonie.be/dgatlp/dgatl
p
Un espace publique pour tous x x m h
Un Logement pour tous » Pour une
x x m h
Wallonie accessible
Cahier de prescriptions techniques
pour l’accessibilité et l’adaptation
x x m h
des logements sociaux pour
personnes handicapées
Fiches techniques pour faciliter la
réalisation de plans, ANLH-ACCESA x x m h
10 fiches (recto/verso)
Une ville pour tous, Pour une
x l l
Wallonie accessible
Design For All : « AAoutils –
x x m h
Architecture et Accessibilité :
- 133 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
outils pour une formation,
RRU Règlement régional d'urbanisme -
http://www.rru.irisnet.be/fr/indexfr. x x x x m h
htm
BULGARIA
CANADA
CSA, CSA B651 Canadian Standards Association -
CSA B651 Accessibility of the Built
x h
Environment Standard
http://www.shopcsa.ca/onlinestore/
CSA B44 Canadian Standards Association -
CSA B44 Elevator Standard x h
CSA B355 Canadian Standards Association -
CSA B355 Passenger Lift
x h
Standardhttp://www.shopcsa.ca/onl
inestore/
CSA B651.1 Canadian Standards Association -
CSA B651 Accessible Design for
x h
Automated Banking Machines
CSA Z614 Canadian Standards Association -
CSA Z614 Accessible Play Structures x m
NBC National Building Code
http://www.fedpubs.com/subject/h x x h
ousing/natbuilding.htm
TB Treasury Board Policy Real Property
Accessibility Guidelines
http://www.tpsgc- h
pwgsc.gc.ca/biens-property/sngp-
npms/tech/accssblt/index-eng.html
TC Transport Canada x x m
- 134 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/acts-
regulations/menu.htm
CTA Canadian Transportation Agency
http://www.otc- x x l
cta.gc.ca/doc.php?sid=25&lang=eng
OBC Ontario Building Code (Provincial
Code)
x x h
https://www.publications.serviceont
ario.ca/ecom/
CoT ADG City of Toronto Accessibility Design
Guidelines
x m
http://www.toronto.ca/diversity/pdf
/accessibility_design_guidelines.pdf
CoW FADS City of Windsor - Facility Accessibility
Design Standards
x m
http://www.citywindsor.ca/002276.
asp
CoL FADS City of London - Facility Accessibility
Design Standards
x m
http://www.london.ca/d.aspx?s=/Ac
cessibility/accessibilitystandards.htm
AODA Accessibility for Ontarians with
Disabilities Act 2005 http://www.e-
x x m
laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/englis
h/elaws_statutes_05a11_e.htm
BCBC British Columbia Building Code
(Provincial Code)
x x h
http://www.bccodes.ca/bccode_buil
ding.htm
VBBL City of Vancouver Building By Laws
2007
m
http://www.bccodes.ca/vancouver_
bylaws.htm
ABBC Alberta Building Code 2006 x x h
- 135 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
(Provincial Code)
http://www.lrc.education.gov.ab.ca/
CADG Calgary Access Design Guidelines
http://www.calgary.ca/DocGallery/B
x m
U/dba/development/access_design_
guidelines.pdf
QCC Quebec Construction Code 2006
(Provincial Code)
x x h
http://www.pubgouv.com/cnr/const
rcod_qc.htm
NSBCR Nova Scotia Building Code
Regulations (2009) (Provincial Code)
x x x h
http://www.gov.ns.ca/just/regulatio
ns/regs/bcregs.htm
CYPRUS
SUABW-2010 Approved Prototype for the Safe Use This approved 'Model of Planning' constitutes an integral piece of the
and Accessibility of Building Works, Regulation of Roads and Buildings (Modification) Law 2010, article 8 (3)
April 2010. Ministry of the Interior “Safety in the use”, that constitutes the harmonisation of the
Democratic Republic of Cyprus with the European Directive
x x h h 89/106/[EU]. It concerns the planning and the construction of each road
and building in order that their use does not involve unacceptable
dangers of accidents, providing simultaneously safety in use and
circulation of persons with reduced mobility and persons with
disabilities.
CZECH REPUBLIC
DENMARK
BR 2010 BR 2010 Building regulations,
http://www.ebst.dk/br10bygningsre x x x x h h
glementer
GMAARBC Guide to Municipal Authorities on Handles selected difficult aspects of reasonable accommodation in
Accessibility Requirements in x x x x h existing buildings
Building Control (GMAARBC)
- 136 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
SBi 230 SBi 230 Guideline on building When used in combination with BR 2008 checklists
x x l l
regulations (www.sbi.dk)
BR 2010 www.sbi.dk/tilgaengelighed/tjekliste Principle of combined building regulation and guideline checklist system
x x x x h h
Checklists r very useful for contracts
DS 105 DS 105 Outdoor areas for All x x l l
DS 3028 DS 3028 Accessibility for All x x h l
HIT Handbook on Accessibility x x m m
DS 105.b DS 105.b Recreative Areas for All x x l l
SBireport 236 User-friendly waste disposal Differentiation between requirements and recommendations to be
with emphasis on disability x x m improved
and accessibility
Access to Access to churches,
x x l h
churches http://tilgaengelighed.km.dk/
ESTONIA
EE Build Act Estonia Building Act
EE Plan Act Estonia Planning Act
FINLAND
LUBA Land Use and Building Act l l
NB F1 The National Buildingcode of
Finland. F1 Barrierfree Building,
Regulations and guidelines x x m l
2005,www.miljo.fi/byggbestämmels
er
NB F2 The National Buildingcode of
Finland.F2 Safety in use buildings
x x m l
Regulations and guidelines 2001.
www.miljo.fi/byggbestämmelser
NB G1 The National Buildingcode of
Finland. G1 Housing design
x x m l
Regulations and guidelines 2005.
www.miljo.fi/byggbestämmelser
SuRaKu The Public Works
Department.Helsinki City Board. x x h l
SuRaKu-Criteria. www.hel.fi
- 137 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
SCW Supervision of
construction work
France FRANCE
France Act N°2005-102 Act on equal rights and
of the 11 of opportunities, participation and
February 2005 citizenship of the persons with
disabilities
France 2008/233 decree amending the construction
and housing code and relating to
the evacuation facilities in
establishments open to the public,
and to the safety provisions ofhigh-
rise buildings
France 2007/545 Order laying down the provisions
for the implementation of Articles
R.111-18 to R.111-18-7 of the
Construction and Housing Code on
the accessibility for disabled
persons of collective residential
buildings and individual houses
during their construction.
France 2007/544 Order aying down the provisions for
the implementation of Articles
R.111-19 to R.111-19-3 and R.111-
19-6 of the Construction and
Housing Code on the accessibility to
disabled persons of establishments
open to the public and installations
open to the public during their
construction or their creation.
R.111-19-8 and R.111-19-11 of the
- 138 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
persons of existing establishments
open to the public and existing
installations open to the public.
R.111-18-8 and R.111-18-9 of the
buildings undergoing refurbishment
and of existing buildings in which
housing is created by a change of
use
R.111-18-4 to R.111-18-7 of the
persons of individual houses during
their construction
R.111-19 to R.111-19-6 of the
persons of establishments open to
the public and installations open to
the public during their construction
or their creation.
R.111-18 to R.111-18-3 of the
- 139 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
buildings during their construction
France 2005/643 decree on the accessibility of
establishments open to the public,
installations open to the public and
residential buildings, and amending
the Construction and Housing Code
France NF P91-350 Ways. Insertion of disabled persons.
Urban pedestrian ways. Design and x x
equipping conditions for ways.
France NF P91-351 Footways - Integration of disabled
people - caution warning -
Characteristics, testing and rules for
x x
ground installation of pedotactile
caution warning devices for blind or
partially sighted persons
France BP P96-100 Guide of best practices for the
attention of owners to carry out an
x x
accessibility diagnostic of
establishments receiving the public
France BP P96-101 Visual alarms for deaf people and
x x
evacuation facilities
France BP P96-102 Taking account of the chain of
accessibility in the area constituted
x x
of establishments receiving public
and their surrounding
France BP P96-104 location - orientation x x
France BP X35-072 Signing x x
France BP X35-075 Clearance of the difference in
x x
height of an entrance step
GERMANY
GG Grundgesetz Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik I. Grundrechte Artikel 3, Absatz 3:
Deutschland ;
- 140 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
www.bundesregierung.de Niemand darf wegen seiner Behinderung benachteiligt werden.
BGG Behindertengleichstellungsgesetz Gesetz zur Gleichstellung behinderter Menschen und zur Änderung
Behinderten- (BGG) vom 27. April 2002; letzte anderer Gesetze in diesem Zusammenhang
gleichstellungsge Änderung vom 1. Januar 2008, BGBl.
setz I S. 1468 und BGBL. I S. 3024, 3034;
gültig ab2002-05-01;
www.gesetze-im-internet-de
Gleichstellungsg Beispiele:
esetze der Bayern:www.stmas.bayern.de/behin
Länder derte/politik/baybgg.htm
Brandenburg:
www.mdje.brandenburg.de/Landesr
echt/gesetzblatt/texte/K87/87-
02.htm
Sachsen-Anhalt:www.sachsen-
anhalt.de/rcs/LSA/pub/
Berlin:
www.berlin.de/sengessozv/lfbehi/01
0.php
Musterbauord- model building regulation (MBO) as recommendation to the 16 German federal states
nung (MBO) § 50 construction of accessible
2002 (model buildings x l
building
regulations)
LBO Landesbauordnungen Architects have to confirm during the building license proceedings that
(building regulation of the German they have considered in their design all accessibility issues. A final
federal state); statement has to be given by them or by a civil engineer that the
execution has been done according accessibilit.y
Landesbauordnung Baden- Herstellung von Barrierefreiheit ist auch im Nachhinein einklagbar in
Württemberg Bezug auf die im jeweiligen Bundesland eingeführten technischen
- 141 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
Bayerische Bauordnung, Baubestimmungen.
Baugesetzbuch Regelungen zum barrierefreien Bauen findet man in der Bauordnung
Bauordnung für Berlin des jeweiligen Bundeslandes. Inwieweit die DIN 18024-1,-2, DIN 18025-
Brandenburgische Bauordnung 1,-2 in dem jeweiligen Bundesland rechtlich verbindlich ist, bestimmt
Bremische Landesbauordnung die jeweilige Landesbauordnung.
Hamburgische Bauordnung
Hessische Bauordnung
Niedersächsische Bauordnung
Bauordnung für das Land Nordrhein-
Westfalen
Landesbauordnung Mecklenburg-
Vorpommern
Landesbauordnung Rheinland-Pfalz
Landesbauordnung Saarland
Sächsische Bauordnung
Bauordnung des Landes Sachsen-
Anhalt
Landesbauordnung für das Land
Schleswig-Holstein
Thüringer Bauordnung
Landesbauordnu Example 1: New buildings all 4 standards (DIN 18024-1,-2, DIN 18025-1,-2) are implemented
ngen Hessen and
Schleswig-
Holstein
x h
(building
regulation of the
German federal
state Hessen)
Landesbauordnu Example 2: existing buildings all 4 standards (DIN 18024-1,-2, DIN 18025-1,-2) are implemented
ngen Hessen and
Schleswig-
Holstein m
(building
regulation of the
German federal
- 142 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
state Schleswig-
Holstein)
Landesbauordnu Example 3:new and existing no standard of the 4 standards (DIN 18024-1,-2, DIN 18025-1,-2) is
ng Nordrhein- buildings implemented
Westfalen
(building x l
regulation of the
German federal
state NRW)
Liste der List of Acknowledged technical rules This list contains technical rules for the planning, design and building of
Technischen for works'; construction works and their parts.
Baubestimmung Part I (Model list); Contains among others DIN 18024-1,-2, DIN 18025-1,-2
en Part II List of Acknowledged
('Acknowledged technical rules for works; x h
technical rules Part III List of Acknowledged
for works') technical rules for works
Implementation may be that in some German federal states does not contain e.g. DIN
of the Model list 18024-1,-2, DIN 18025-1,-2
in the German
federal states
MVersStättV, Muster- Is implemented in building codes of the 16 German federal states
06-2005 Versammlungsstättenverordnung; x x l
www.is-argebau.de
Gaststättengeset GastG, Ausfertigungsdatum:
z GastG 05.05.1970 (restaurants)
(Regulation on
the Gaststättengesetz in der Fassung der
requirements for Bekanntmachung vom 20. x l
restaurants) November 1998 (BGBl. I S. 3418),
das zuletzt durch Artikel 10 des
Gesetzes vom 7. September 2007
(BGBl. I S. 2246) geändert worden
- 143 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
ist; Stand: Neugefasst durch Bek. v.
20.11.1998 I 3418; zuletzt geändert
durch Art. 10 G v. 7.9.2007 I 2246
DIN Standards Standards are not in themselves regulatory in nature and their use is
voluntary. Although standards are in effect recommendations, they are
widely used because of the benefits they bring and because they
contain a concentration of qualified technical information.
Standards only become mandatory if they are referred to in private

contracts or agreements, or in laws or regulations and their use is stated
as a requirement. Standards can prevent legal disputes, because they
set out unambiguous specifications.
DIN 18040-1; Construction of accessible buildings - not before after publication and implementation in the building code
2010-10 Design principles - Part 1: Publicly x x x x h
accessible buildings
DIN 18024- Construction of accessible buildings -
2:1996-11 Part 2: Publicly accessible buildings
and workplaces, design principles
Note: To be x
replaced by DIN
18040-1: 2010-
10
DIN 18040-2; Construction of accessible buildings - not before after publication and implementation in the building code
2011-XX Design principles - Part 2: Dwellings x x x x h
DIN 18025-1 Accessible dwellings; dwellings for

1992-12 wheel chair users, design principles
Note: To be x
replaced by DIN
18040-2: 2011-
XX
DIN 18025-2 Accessible dwellings; design
x
1992-12 principles
- 144 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
Note: To be
replaced by DIN
18040-2: 2011-
XX
DIN 18024-1 Barrier-free built environment - Part
1998-01- 1: Streets, squares, paths, public
transport, recreation areas and
Revision under playgrounds - Design prinicples x
preparation
(future DIN
18070)
DIN 32975:2009- Designing visual information in the
x
12 public area for accessible use
DIN 32976:2007- Braille - Requirements and
x
08 dimensions
DIN 32981: Special devices for blind and partially
2002-11 sighted persons on traffic signals - x
Requirements
DIN 32984: Ground surface indicators in public
2000-05; traffic areas
x
Draft DIN 32984:
2010-02
DIN SPEC 18913: Spectator facilities - Part 1: Layout
2010-08 CEN/TR criteria for spectator viewing area -
15913:2009; Specification
will be added in
DIN EN 13200-1:
2004-05; x
Spectator
facilities —
Layout criteria
for viewing area
for spectators
- 145 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
with special
needs
DIN Technical Products in Design for All
Report 124: x
2002
DIN-Fachbericht Orientation systems - Requirements
142 on orientation systems in open x
2005-05 buildings
BGR 181 BG-Regel — Fußböden in
Arbeitsräumen und x
Arbeitsbereichen mit Rutschgefahr
GUV-I 8527 GUV-I 8527 ) , GUV-Informationen —
Bodenbeläge für nassbelastete x
Barfußbereiche
RILSA 2010 RiLSA (2010), Richtlinien für
Lichtsignalanlagen
x
– Lichtzeichenanlagen für den
Straßenverkehr; (FGSV-Nr. 321)
EFA 2002 Empfehlungen für Anlagen des
x
Fußgängerverkehrs
RASt 06 Richtlinien für die Anlage von
x
Stadtstrassen: 2006
FGSV Hinweise für
under barrierefreie Verkehrsanlagen
x
preparation
(2010?)
Deutsche Bahn Konzernrichtlinie der Modulfamilie
x
813 - "Personenbahnhöfe planen"
Richtlinie für Richtlinie für taktile Schriften,
taktile Schriften Broschüre des Deutschen Blinden-
und Sehbehindertenverbandes
x
zu beziehen
unter
www.gfuv.de
- 146 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
GREECE
CG, 2001 The Constitution of Greece, 2001 Refers in particular to equal rights of all citizens: articles 4, 5Α, 21, 22,
25 and 116.
Circ. 8303/2008 Government Circular. Ministry of Government Circular for municipalities, (THESEAS programme 2005-
MININT. Interior. 8303/08.02.2008. 2009), to implement legal framework ref. DGPA 1998 MINENV. for
Accessibility Network for People x x m m outdoor areas.
with Disabilities removing barriers
from common areas.
Circ. 1537/2009, Government Circular 20-01-2009 Government Circular for municipalities. Continuation in 2009-2010 of
MININT. Protocol no. THESEAS programme, Circ. 8303/2008.
DIADP/P.ΑMEA/F.3/6/1537 Ministry
x x m m
of Internal Affairs and Public
Administration Accessibility
Programme for Municipalities.
Circ. 21826/2007 Accessible Beaches
x m m
MININT.
DG, 2001 Design Guidelines «Access for
MINHSW people with special needs in public
x x h h
spaces”. MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND
SOCIAL WELFARE-2001
DGAB, 2003 “Design Guidelines for accessible Best Practice example
MINDEV. beaches”. Ministry of Development
x x h h
2003. Also see Circular 21826/2007
MININT.
DG-OEK, 2006 Designing for People with Disabilities Design Guide for accessible housing used by state housing organisation,
and others who need good OEK.
accessibility. Technical requirements
and guidelines for the design and
construction of accessible houses
x x h h
and housing estates for all. Internal
document, Workers’ Housing
Organisation, (OEK) Department of
Architectural Studies, 2006. Ministry
of Labour.
- 147 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
DGPA, 1998. “Design Guidelines. Planning for All”. This was the first major functional-technical guideline on accessibility
MINENV Office for People with Special Needs, and all subsequent laws refer to this document.
Ministry of Environment, Planning
x x h h
and Public Works, 1998.
http://www.minenv.gr/1/16/162/16
203/g1620300.html
ΕLΟΤ ΕΝ 81.80- Standards for construction, ELOT is the acronym for the Greek National Standards Organisation
2004 operation, etc. of lifts
ΕLΟΤ ΕΝ 81.2- See:
x x h h
2000 http://www.elot.gr/170_ELL_HTML.
ΕLΟΤ ΕΝ 81.1- aspx
1999
HG 2004 HERMIS Guide 2004, ATHOC and Used for the preparation of the Olympic Games in Athens and Olympic
Athens Chamber of Commerce Cities to improve access to shops. Businesses which achieved the
x x l m
required access standards were listed in the Guide. Not followed up
since 2004.
J-TAP, 2008 “JASON” Programme. Typical Action Provides a structured method for disabled people to demand their
Plan for Restoring Accessibility at the access rights and for local authorities to identify problems and give
Local Level. Guideline, ESAMEA. x x h h solutions to accessibility problems.
National Organisation of Disabled
Peoples’ Associations
L-2831/2000 Law. General Building Regulations For Public Procurement: this is the law and must be followed in every
art.28 2831/2000 art.28. Ministry of case. Refers to the Accessibility Design Guidelines DGPA, 1998. MINENV
GBR,MINENV. Environment, Planning and Public for technical specifications.
Works. Special arrangements for x x x x
people with special needs.
Amendment of Law about General
Building Regulations no. 1577/1985.
L-2696/1999 & L- The Highway Code 2007. Law For Public Procurement: this is the law and must be followed in every
3542/2007 3542/2007 Updating of case.
MINTRANS. Ν.2696/1999/FΕΚ 57Α/23.03.99. x x
Ministry of Transport &
Communications.
MCAPSI, 2009. Methodology for Checking x x h h Access checking tool and design guidelines for public buildings, outdoor
- 148 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
MININT. Accessibility in Public Services and spaces and transport, referring to all access legislation. Also relevant for
Infrastructures. 2009. Ministry of the conformity checking.
Interior.
MD 2072/1992, Law 2072/1992, Ministerial Decision For Public Procurement: this is the law and must be followed in every
MINH. of Ministry of Health and Social Care case. Is expected to be partly amended by the new law on National
and Ministry of Labour, x x System of Health and Social Welfare 2010.
Rehabilitation Centres and Day Care
Centres.
PD 27/1999 Building Code Presidential Decree. For Public Procurement: law must be followed where it applies.
x x x x
(Official Gazette 580D/27.7.1999)
MD 52487/2001, Βuilding Code MD 52487/2001 For Public Procurement: law must be followed where it applies. Refers
MINENV. (Official Gazette 18 / B / 15.1.2002) to: DGPA, 1998. MINENV “Design Guidelines. Planning for All”.
Ministry of Environment, Planning
x x x x
and Public Works. Special
arrangements for services for
disabled people in existing buildings.
MD 52907/2009 MD 52907-Ministry of Environment For Public Procurement: this is the law and must be followed in every
MINENV. and Climate Change. Special case.
arrangements for common spaces
of housing estates/areas for the
x x x x
circulation of pedestrians, in order
to serve the needs of people with
disabilities. Official Gazette 2621 B/
31-12-09
MD 94643/2007. Ministerial Decision. Ministry of For Public Procurement: law must be followed where it applies. This
MINH Health and Social Care, 94643/2007. decision covers the gap of the general building regulation concerning
Concerning Health conditions and x x the obligation for accessibility in catering businesses restaurants,
permits for catering businesses, cafeterias etc.
restaurants, cafeterias etc.
Circ. Government Circular 16/5 /2008 No. Government Circular for catering businesses and shops requiring
66803/2008. 66803 for implementing the law x x l l accessible toilets. Implementation of MD 94643/2007.
MINH 94643/2007. Min Health.
MD Ministerial Decision
x x
32803/1308/199 32803/1308/1997
- 149 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
7 Law on construction and operation
of lifts.
MD Ministerial Decision General law on lifts
3899/253/2002 3899/253/F.9.2/2002
x x
Law on installation, operation,
maintenace and safety of lifts.
PD. 57/2010 Law on the adjustment of Greek For Public Procurement: this is the law and must be followed in every
legislation to EU Directive case.
x x
2006/42/ΕΚ (Lifts and other
mechanisims)
PD 16/1996 Presidential Decree 16/1996. For Public Procurement: this is the law and must be followed in every
Minimum requirements for Health x x case.
and Safety of Workplaces.
PD 43/2002 Presidential Decree 43, Government For Public Procurement: law must be followed where it applies.
MINDEV. Gazette No. 43/7-3-2002
Classification of main hotel types, in
x x
categories (star system) and their
technical requirements, pages 449 –
772. Ministry of Development.
PD 79/2004, Ministry of Transport and For Public Procurement: law must be followed where it applies.
MINTRANS. Communications, Presidential Technical specifications are only partially described.
Decree 79/2004. Defining the
conditions and requirements for
x x
establishing and operating bus
stations and terminals
(infrastructure) for long-distance
buses and other vehicles.
HUNGARY
MSZ EN 81-70 MSZ EN 81-70:2006 "Safety rules for
the construction and installations of
lifts. Particular applications for
x x
passenger and good passengers lift.
Part 70: Accessibility to lifts for
persons including persons with
- 150 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
disability"
MSZ ISO 9386- MSZ ISO 9386-1:2002 "Power-
1:2002 operated lifting platforms for
persons with impaired mobility.
x x
Rules for safety, dimensions and
functional operation. Part 1: vertical
lifting platforms"
MSZ EN 81-40 MSZ EN 81-40:2009 "Safety rules for
the construction and installations of
lifts. Special lifts for the transport of
persons and goods. Part 40: Stairlifts x x
and inclined lifting platforms
intended for persons with impaired
mobility"
MSZ EN 24203- MSZ 24203-5:2007 "Requirements
5:2007 for design of institutions for
x x
education. Part 5: Schools for the
handicapped"
CEN/TS 15209 CEN/TS 15209 "Tactile paving
surface indicators produced from x x
concrete, clay and stone”
ÚT 2-1.208:2009 Hungarian Road Society (2009) Road
Technical Specification. "Traffic
x x
Facilities in Roads for Disabled
Persons"
HRS-12DG Hungarian Road Society (2000)
Design Guideline, "12. Traffic
x x
Facilities in Roads for Persons with
Impaired Disability"
APS Public Foundation for Equal
Opportunities of Persons with
Disabilities (2009) "Guide for x x
providing equal opportunities on
acces to public services"
- 151 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
http://www.fszk.hu/api/szakmai_an
yagok/segedlet_v6_2009_ebook.pdf
DGABE Ministry of Local Government
(2007) "Design Guideline for x x
Accessible Built Environment"
AWARD Tempus Public Foundation, Lifelong
learning programme Leonardo da
Vinci Project (2009) "AWARD
x x
Accessible Word for All, Respecting
Differences"
www.mfk.unideb.hu/profzold
LH Motiváció Foundation (2003) "Living
x x
home"
LW Motiváció Foundation (2008) "Living
workplace 1-2."
http://www.motivacio.hu/sites/defa
ult/files/Elo_munkahely_01_kotet.p
x x
df and
http://www.motivacio.hu/sites/defa
ult/files/Elo_munkahely_02_kotet.p
df
SLS MAHADI (2010) "Special Labor
Safety of Accessible Work
Environment" x x
http://www.mahadi.hu/kiadvany/kia
dvany.pdf
AFPBE Act LXXVIII of 1997 on Formation
and Protection of Built Environment
ADP Act XXVI of 1998 on "Rights and
Provision of Equal Opportunities for
Disabled Persons"
OTEK National Building Regulation
AETPEO Act CXXV of 2003 on Equal
Treatment and Promotion of Equal
- 152 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
Opportunities
IRELAND
EEA Employment Equality Act 1998 to
2008 (www.equality.ie)
ESA Equal Status Acts 2000 & 2004
(www.equality.ie)
DA 2005 Disability Act 2005
(www.oireachtas.ie)
PA Planning & Development Act 2000
BCA Building Control Acts 1990 - 2007
(www.environ.ie)
BCR 2009 Building Control (Amendment) Introduced requirements for Disability Access Certificates (DACs)
x
Regulations 2009 (www.environ.ie)
Pt M 2000 Building Regulation 2000 Part M - Current building regulation for access, performance based, with limited
Access for People with Disabilities - technical guidance
x x x x m l
and Technical Guidance Document
(www.environ.ie)
Pt M 2009 Draft Building Regulation 2009 Part M - Draft regulation due to be published 2010 with more comprehensive
Access and Use - and Technical guidance
x x x x h l
Guidance Document Draft
(www.environ.ie)
BfE 2002 Building for Everyone 2002 Comprehensive good practice guidance - but mainly based on anecdotal
x x h l
(www.nda.ie) evidence and experience, with limited research to back it up.
BfE 2010 Draft Building for Everyone 2010 Draft Revised version of BfE - consultation draft
x x h l
(www.nda.ie)
PSEE Promoting Safe Egress and Used in conjunction with building regulations and standards related to
Evacuation for People with x l l fire
Disabilities (www.nda.ie)
GAPT Recommended Accessibility Simple guidelines for public transport operators
Guidelines for Public Transport x l l
Operators in Ireland (www.nda.ie)
GAMT Guidelines for Accessible Maritime Non technical guidelines for maritime transport providers
x l l
Passenger Transport (www.nda.ie)
IWA Irish Wheelchair Association Best x x m l Mainly focused on wheelchair accessibility
- 153 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
Practice Access Guidelines
(www.iwa.ie)
NCBI National Council for the Blind of Guidance specifically for people with vision impairment
Ireland Recommendations for
x x m l
Signage, Floor Surfaces, External and
Internal Environments(www.ncbi.ie)
HDG Housing Design Guidelines for Suitable for use only in relation to adapted and accessible housing
Occupational Therapists x x m m
(www.aoti.ie)
LGMSB Good Practice Guidelines on Limited to pedestrian crossings
Accessibility of Streetscapes LGMSB x x l l
(www.lgmsb,.ie)
ITALY
LATVIA
LV Constr Law Latvian Construction Law
LITHUANIA
LT Constr Law Lithuanian Construction Law
LUXEMBOURG
Loi du 29 mars Accessibilité des lieux ouverts au
2001 public +Règlement grand-ducal du
25 janvier 2008 modifiant le
règlement grand-ducal du 23
novembre 2001 m m
portant exécution des articles 1 et 2
de la loi du 29 mars 2001 portant sur
l’accessibilité des lieux
ouverts au public.
Loi du 22 juillet Accessibilité des lieux ouverts au
2008 public aux personnes handicapées
l l
accompagnées de chiens
d’assistance
Guide of practice Accessibilité au transport aérien
x x m l
pour les personnes à mobilité
- 154 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
réduite et les personnes
handicapées
GDN Guide des normes x x m m
MALTA
NETHERLANDS
DBD 2003 DUTCH BUILDING DECREE 2003 x x m m
POLAND
PORTUGAL
Decreto Lei 18/2008 de 29 de Legislation regulating Public Calls for Tender
Janeiro
Decreto - Lei 163/2008 de 8 de
Agosto
ROMANIA
Law 50/1995 Romanian law regarding quality in
buildings
NP 051 - 2001 Adaptation of the civil buildings and
their urban surroundings to the
x x h h
requirements of the people with
impairement
SLOVAKIA
SLOVENIA
SPAIN
NATIONAL
LIONDAU -Law on Equal Opportunities, Non
Discrimination and Universal
Accessibility- Ley de Igualdad de l m
Oportunidades, No Discriminación y
Accesibilidad Universal
RD 505/2007 -basic conditions of accessibility in l m
- 155 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
public spaces and buildings- Real
Decreto por el que se regulan las
condiciones básicas de accesibilidad
y no discriminación para el acceso y
la utilización de los espacios públicos
urbanizados y edificaciones
RD 1544/2007 -Basic conditions of transport
accessibility- Condiciones básicas de
accesibilidad y no discriminación
l l
para el acceso y utilización de los
modos de transporte para personas
con discapacidad.
CTE/DB-SUA - Use and Accessibility Security-
Documento Básico de Seguridad de
x x m h
Uso y Accesibilidad (Código Técnico
de la Edificación)
CTE/DB-SI -Fire Safety- Documento Básico de
Seguridad en caso de Incendio x x m m
(Código Técnico de la Edificación)
Orden -Accessibility in public spaces
VIV/561/2010 urbanized- Documento técnico que
desarrolla las condiciones básicas de
x x l m
accesibilidad y no discriminación
para el acceso y la utilización de los
espacios públicos urbanizados
Orden -Guide dogs- Orden de 18 de junio
18/06/1985 de 1985 sobre uso de perros guia x l l
para deficientes visuales
UNE Universal accessibility:
170001:2007
UNE Part 1: MGLC criteria to facilitate
x x m m
170001:2007 accessibility to the enviorenment
UNE Part 2: Accessibility management
x x l l
170001:2007 system
- 156 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
UNE Accessibility requirements for signs Especially interesting for maintaining and improving
x x h h
170002:2009
UNE-EN 81- UNE-EN 81-70:2004 on the
70:2004 'Accessibility to lifts for persons x x m m
including persons with disabilities'
UNE 41500 Accessibility in building and
x x l m
IN:2001 urbanism. Design general criteria
UNE 41510:2001 Accessibility in the urbanism x x l m
UNE 41512:2001 Accessibility in beaches and its
x x l m
environs
UNE 41520:2002 Accessibility in building. Horizontal
x x l m
communication elements
UNE 41522:2001 Accessitility in building. Accesses to
x x l m
the buildings
UNE 41523:2001 Accessibility in buildings. Sanitary
x x l m
spaces
CATALUÑA
DEC135/1995 Decreto 135/1995 de desarrollo de
x x l l
la Ley de Accesibilidad de Cataluña
LEY 10/1993 Ley 10/1993 de acceso al entorno de
las personas con perros guía en x l l
Cataluña
VALENCIA
ORDEN Accesibilidad en el medio urbano en
x x m m
9/06/2004 Valencia
ORDEN Accesibilidad en la edificación de
x x m m
25/05/2004 pública concurrencia en Valencia
LEY 9/2009 Ley de Accesibilidad al Transporte en
l l
Valencia
MADRID
DCM 13/2007 Reglamento Técnico de Accesibilidad
x x m m
de Madrid
ANDALUCÍA
- 157 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
RAA D293/2009 Reglamento que regula las normas
para la accesibilidad en las
infraestructuras, el urbanismo, la x x h h
edificación y el transporte en
Andalucía.
CASTILLA Y LEÓN
RACyL Reglamento de Accesibilidad y
D217/2001 Supresión de Barreras en Castilla y x x l m
León
CANARIAS
D 227/1997 Reglamento de la Ley de
x x l m
Accesibilidad de Canarias
Anejos D Manual del Reglamento de
x m h
227/1997 Accesibilidad de Canarias
Ley 8/1995 Ley de accesibilidad y supresión de
barreras físicas y de la comunicación
de Canarias
GALICIA
D 35/2000 Reglamento de desarrollo de la Ley
x x l m
de Accesibilidad de Galicia
SWEDEN
PBL, BVL, BVF The Planning and Building Act PBL) You cannot really choose different levels for adapting a building.
The Act on Technical Requirments If a building is altered in some other
for Construction works,etc. (BVL) way, the same requirements as for new buildings shall be satisfied but
The Ordinance (1994:1215) on l l consideration shall be paid to the proportions of the alteration and the
Technical Requirements for standard of the building. What can e chosen in existing building is to
Construction Works, etc. (BVF) only remove easilyeliminated obstacles. . See HIN
www.boverket.se
BBR The National Board of Housing, h (as a Consideration taken only to people with limited mobility or orientation
Building and Planning (Boverket) specifiktion capacity, (impaired vision, hearing or cognitive ability.) People with
Building regulations" (2008). x x for what has l allergy to some extent covered by health- chapter. As tech spec: Not a
Www.boverket.se to be criteria for awarding public contracts since the regulations always have
achieved) to be fulfilled when buildingwork is done. As guidance: You cannot
- 158 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
really choose different levels for adapting a building.
If a building is altered in some other way, the same requirements as for
new buildings shall be satisfied but with consideration taken to the
proportions of the alteration and the standard of the building. What
can be chosen in existing building is to only remove easily eliminated
obstacles. . See HIN
ALM The National Board of Housing, h (as a As tech spec: Not a criteria for awarding public contracts since the
Building and Planning (Boverket) specifiktion regulations always have to be fulfilled .
Accessibility and usability in public x x for what has
spaces. BFS 2004:15 - to be
ALM" www.boverket.se achieved)
HIN The National Board of Housing, h (as a
Building and Planning (Boverket) specifiktion
Removal of easily eliminated x x for what has m
obstacles - code of statues" BFS to be
2003:19 - HIN 1 www.boverket.se achieved)
BÄR The National Board of Housing,
Building and Planning (Boverket) .
x l l
Boverkets Ändringsråd. (Rebuilding)
www.boverket.se
SS 763520 Swedish Standards institute . Hissar -
personhissar. (About elevators .
Measures suitable for transportation
of stretchers)
SS 914221 Swedish Standards institute Referred to in BBR. As tech spec: Include different level but what level
Byggnadsutformning Bostäder should be achieved is probably specified and therefore not a criteria for
Invändiga mått (Dwellings- measures x h m awarding public contracts
indoors.) www.sis.se As guidance: Here are different levels, one minimum and one higher. If
you want higher level than the minimum, this could be used.
SS 25268 Swedish Standards institute. Referred to in BBR
Byggakustik - Ljudklassning av
x h
utrymmen i byggnader - Vårdlokaler,
undervisningslokaler, dag- och
- 159 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
fritidshem, kontor (Accoustics).
www.sis.se
SS 25267 Swedish Standards institute. Referred to in BBR
Byggakustik - Ljudklassning av
x h
utrymmen i byggnader - Bostäder
(Accoustics,dwellings). www.sis.se
SS 2097-7 Swedish Standards institute. SS
2097-7, Hissar - Lågfartshissar -
x l
Säkerhetsregler för plattformshissar
(Platform lift).www.sis.se
SS-EN 12464-1 Swedish Standards institute. SS-EN Not sure if accessibility aspects have been considered enough.
12464-1. Ljus och belysning –
Belysning av arbetsplatser – Del 1: x h
Arbetsplatser inomhus. (Lighting
workingplaces.) www.sis.se
SS 437 01 46 Swedish Standards institute. SS 437
01 46. Elinstallationer i byggnader –
Uttag och andra anslutningspunkter x h
– Omfattning och placering.
(Electrical installations). www.sis.se
AFS 2009:02 Swedish Work Environment Agency.
Arbetsplatsens utformning. x x l
(Workingplaces). www.av.se
VGU Swedish transport Administration . Construction of roads and streets. Accessibility issues are included.
Vägar och gators utformning . VGU.
x x h
(Roads and streets).
http://www.skl.se/web/VGU_1.aspx
SFA Swedish Forest Agency. Access to
the forests for disabled people.
Rapport 2005:1 . x x h
ww.svo.se/forlag/rapporter/1678.pd
f).
HS Handisam. Break the barriers. Guidelines for governmental authorities. Also include groups like
x x m l
www.handisam.se persons with allergy.
- 160 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
SKL Sveriges kommuner och landsting.
Mer åt fler på lekplatsen, x x l
(playgrounds)
BI Sv Byggtjänst . Bygg ikapp. (More
detailed requirements as a
x x l l
complement to building regulations).
Www.byggtjanst.se.
SWITZERLAND
BehiG Schweizerisches The law has to comply with all new buildings as well as renovation
"Behindertengleichstellungsgesetz" projects: - all public and private buildings open to the public, public
(BehiG) "Federal Act on the transport, buildings with 50 workplaces or more and residential
Elimination of Discrimination against buildings with 8 apartments or more. With renovation projects
People with Disabilities (DDA, SR additional charges of up to 20% of the total renovation costs or 5% of
151.3)" the building insurances worth are considered to be reasonable. Further
details are referred to in the cantonal building regulations.
h h
Das Gesetz muss bei sämtlichen Neu- und Umbauten eingehalten
werden: - alle öffentlichen und privaten Bauten mit Publikumsverkehr,
öffentliche Transportangebote, Bauten mit mehr als 50 Arbeitsplätzen,
Wohnbauten mit mehr als 8 Wohnungen. Bei Umbauten gelten
Mehrkosten von 20 % der Umbausummen oder 5% des
Gebäudeversicherungswertes als zumutbar und verhältnissmässig. Für
Details wird auf die Kantonalen Bauvorschriften verwiesen.
BehiV "Behindertengleichstelungsverordnu Die BehiV legt fest wie das BehiG anzuwenden ist.
ng" h h
VböV "Verordnung behindertengerechte Legt im Detail fest was im Sinne des BehiG zum öffentlichen Verkehr
Gestaltung des öffentlichen gehört und wo der Zugang gewährleistet sein muss.
Verkehrs" (VböV) Ordinance on
the Adaptation of Public Transport
to the Needs of People with h h
Disabilities (PTAO, SR 151.34)
www.bav.admin.ch/mobile
- 161 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
VAböV "Verordnung über technischeen Die VAböV verweist für Bauten auf die SIA 500 und regelt ergänzend die
Anforderungnen an die öV-Spezifischen technischen Anforderungen.
behindertengerechte Gestaltung des
öffentlichen Verkehrs" (VAböV)
DETEC Ordinance on the Technical
Requirements for Engineering Public
Transport to Meet the Needs of h h
People with Disabilities (PTTRO, SR
151.342)
Kant. Baugesetze Kant. Baugesetze und Most of the cantonal building laws and regulations insist on compliance
Bauverordnungen in 26 Kanone with the standard SIA 500. With residential buildings most cantonal
regulations go further than the minimal national requirements. In most
cases "adaptable residential building" in accordance with SIA 500 is to
be followed from a minimum 4 or 6 apartments. Die
x h h
meisten Kant. Baugesetze und Verordnungen verlangen die Einhaltung
der Norm SIA 500. Bei Wohnbauten gehen die meisten kant.
Regelungen weiter als die minimalen nationalen Vorschriften.
Mehrheitlich ist der "Anpassbare Wohnungsbau" gemäss SIA 500 ab 4
oder 6 Wohneinheiten zu befolgen.
SVG Schweizerisches In addition to law and the regulation technical requirements it mostly
Strassenverkehrsgesetz h h refers to the VSS standard. Neben einigen technischen Regelungen in
Gesetz und Verordnung wird mehrheitlich auf VSS-Normen verwiesen.
Kant. Strassenverkehrsgesetze in 26 Neben einigen technischen Regelungen im Gesetz wird mehrheitlich auf
Strassenverkehrs Kantonen h h VSS-Normen verwiesen. In addition to lawful technical
gesetze requirements it mostly refers to the VSS standard.
SIA 500 Norm SIA 500 "Obstacle free For matters of WHAT and HOW has to be built most laws and
buildings" regulations refer to the standard SIA 500. It contains requirements for
buildings open to the public as well as residential buildings, buildings
x h h
with work places and specific regulations for theaters, restaurants,
hotels and buildings for recreational activities.
Für das WIE und WAS gebaut werden muss verweisen die meisten
- 162 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
Gesetze und Verodnungen auf Norm SIA 500. Sie enthält Anforderungn
für öffentlich zugängliche Bauten, Wohnbauten, Bauten mit
Arbeitsplätzen sowie auch spezifische Anforderungen für Theater,
Restaurant, Hotel, Freizeitbauten, etc.
VSS Normen 30 - 40 VSS-Normen für den For matters of WHAT and HOW has to be built external environement
Strassenraum and in road space most laws and regulations refer to the VSS standard.
x h h
Für das WIE und WAS gebaut werden muss im Strassenraum verweisen
die meisten Gesetze und Verodnungen auf VSS-Norm.
Guideline SWP Richtlinie "Strassen, Wege, Plätze" Additions and explanations to the VSS standard. Ergänzungen und
x m m
Erläuterungen zu den VSS-Normen.
Guideline APW Richtlinie "Hindernisfrei - Additions and explanations to the SIA standard. Ergänzungen und
x m m
Anpassbarer Wohnungsbau" Erläuterungen zur SIA-Norm.
Guidelinie Richtlinie "Hotel, Restaurant, Additions and explanations to the SIA standard. Ergänzungen und
x l l
HoReFe Ferienwohnungen" Erläuterungen zur SIA-Norm.
Technical Sheets 20 Technical Sheets for different Additions and explanations to the standards. Ergänzungen und
x m m
issues Erläuterungen zu den Normen.
UNITED
KINGDOM
AAT Departmnent for Transport (2008), This is a government code of practice that is mandatory for all those
'Access to Air Travel for disabled involved in the provision of air travel to take into account. Would be
x x x x h h
persons and persons with reduced used alongside BS8300 and, if appropriate, Part M.
mobility - Code of Practice'.
ATSDGDP Department for Transport (2008), This is a government code of practice that is mandatory for all those
"Accessible train and station design involved in the provision of railway services to take into account. Would
x x x x h h
guide for disabled passengers: A be used alongside BS8300 and, if appropriate, Part M.
code of practice".
BB102 Department for Children, Schools All new schools are built to this standard. Would be used in association
and Families (2008), "Building with BS8300 and, if appropriate, Part M.
Bulletin 102: Designing for disabled
x x h h
children and children with special
educational needs: guidance for
mainstream and special schools".
BS8300 British Standards Institute (2009), BS
x x h h
8300 “Design of buildings and their
- 163 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
approaches to meet the needs of
disabled people – code of practice.”
BS9999 British Standards Institute (2008), BS
9999 ‘Code of practice for fire safety
x x h h
in the design, management and use
of buildings’.
CADW CADW (2002), Overcoming the
x x l l
Barriers'.
CAE Centre for Accesible Environments
and the Royal Institutions of British x x m m
Architects, (2004) 'Good Loo Guide' .
CIRIA CIRIA (2004), "Buildings for all to use
2 – improving the accessibility of x l m
public buildings and environments".
CLG 1 CLG (2007), Approved Document (B)
Fire Safety - Volume 1: "Dwelling x x h h
Houses".
CLG 2 CLG (2007), Approived Document (B)
Fire Safety - Volume 2: "Buildings x x h h
other than dwellings"
CLCM Bright and Cook (2010), "The Colour,
x x x x h h
Light and Contrast Manual"
Countryside The Countryside Agency, (2005) 'By
x x m m
Agency all reasonable means'
Countryside for Fieldfare Trust (2003) "Countryside
x x m m
All for All - Good Practice Guide".
DCfW Design Commisssion for Wales DCfW
(2008), "Design and Access x h h
Statements - Why, What and How".
DCLG Department of Communities and
Local Government (DCLG), “Planning
x h h
and Access for Disabled People – A
Good Practice Guide”.
EH1 English Heritage (2004), 'Easy Access x x h h
- 164 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
to Historic Buildings'
EH2 English Heritage (2005), 'Easy Access
x x h h
to Historic Landscapes'
Footway Design Manual for Roads and
Bridges – "Footway Design Volume x l l
7"
GD1 Guide Dogs for the Blind Association,
UCL (2008), "Testing proposed
delineators to demarcate pedestrian x l l
paths in a shared space
environment".
GD2 Childs CR, DK. Boampong, H.
Rostron, K. Morgan, T. Eccleshall, N.
Tyler (2009), "Effective Kerb Heights
x x l l
for Blind and Partially Sighted
People" (research commissioned by
Guide Dogs).
GD3 Guide Dogs for the Blind Association
GDBA (2009) "Inclusive Streets x x m m
Design Principles"
Green Guide Department for Culture, Media and
Sport (2009), "The Green Guide -
Guide to Safety at Sports Grounds”. x x h h
HBN A HBN (2008), Health Building Note

00-02, "Sanitary Spaces",
x x x x h h
Department of Health Estates and
Facilities Division.
HBN B HBN (2009), Health Building Note
00-03, "Clinical Support Spaces",
x x x x h h
Department of Health Estates and
Facilities Division
HBN C Department of Health Estates and
x x x x h h
Facilities Division, HBN (2008),
- 165 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
Health Building Note 00-04,
"Circulation and Communication
Spaces"
HBN D Department of Health Estates and
Facilities Division, HBN (2008),
x x x x h h
Health Building Note 04-01, "Adult
In-Patient Facilities",
HZ Institute of Highway Incorporated
Engineers (2002), ' Home Zone, x x h h
Design Guidelines'.
ICI/UR ICI Paints and The University of
Reading (2007), 'Colour and x x l m
Contrast'.
Inclusive Department for Transport (2002),
Mobility “Inclusive Mobility: A guide to best
x x h h
practice on access to pedestrian and
transport infrastructure”.
JMU1 JMU et al, (2007), "Designing for
x x m m
Disabled People in Home Zones"
JMU 2 JMU (2005), 'The Accessible Office' x x l m
LTH Habinteg (1997), ‘Lifetime Homes
Standards’. x x h h
Manual for CLG, DfT, WAG (2007), "Manual for

x x x x x x h h
Streets Streets".
Part M - ADM Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
(2004), "Approved Document Part M
x x h h
of the Building Regulations - Access
to and use of Buildings".
PCPA PCPA (2004), "Planning and
h h
Compulsory Purchase Act"
RNIB Royal National Institute for the Blind
RNIB (1995) "Building Sight: A x l m
handbook of building and interior
- 166 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
design solutions to include the needs
of visually impaired people".
See it Right Royal National Institute for the Blind
x m m
RNIB (2006), 'See it right'.
SE Access
Sport England Publications (2001),
"Access for Disabled People". x x h h
SE General Sport England (April 2010),

x x h h
‘Accessible Sports Facilities’.
SE Swim Sport England (March 2008),
x x h h
‘Swimming Pools'.
Sign DesignGuide Sign Design Society and JMU (2000),
x x h h
"Sign Design Guide"
TP Department for Transport (June
2007), ‘Guidance on the use of x x h h
tactile paving surfaces’.
TPT Thomas Pocklington Trust/Habinteg
(2008), 'Housing for people with x x h h
sight loss'.
WHDG Habinteg (2006), ‘Wheelchair
x x h h
Housing Design Guide’.
INTERNATIONAL
- UNIVERSAL
INTERNATIONAL
ANS American National Standards
Institute, Inc. / International Code
Council (2003), "American National x x
Standard, Accessible and Usable
Buildings and Facilities".
IBC The International Code Council
(2009), "International Building Code x
- Chapter 11: Accessibility".
INTERNATIONAL
- 167 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
- NON-EU
MEMBER
COUNTRIES
AUSTRALIA
DS2010 2010 "Disability (Access to Buildings)
x x
Standards"
NEW ZEALAND
NZSS 4121 2001, "New Zealand Standard
x x
Specification No 4121"
PWAP Christchurch City council (2002),
x x
"Parks and Waterway Access Policy".
SINGAPORE
BCA 1 Building and Construction Authority,
BCA (2007), "Code on Accessibility in x x
the Built Environment".
BCA 2 Building and Construction Authority,
BCA (2007), "Universal Design x x
Guide".
SOUTH AFRICA
SANS 10400 SANS 10400-S: South African
National Building Regulations - Part
x x
S. "Faciliities for Persons with
Disabilities"
UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA
(USA)
ADA Department of Justice, Americans
with Disabilities Act (1st July 1994),
x x
"ADA Standards for Accessible
Design".
ADAAG United States Access Board (23 July
2004), "Americans with Disabilities
x x
Act and Architectural Barriers Act
Accessibility Guidelines".
- 168 -
REGULATION
STANDARD
TECHNICAL
GUIDELINE
BUILDING
CODE
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
public existing
contracts buildings
ADA(Med) Department of Justice, Americans
with Disabilities Act (May 2010),
"Access To Medical Care For x x
Individuals With Mobility
Disabilities".
ADA(Stadium) Department of Justice, Americans
with Disabilities Act, "Accessible x x
Stadiums".
ANS American National Standards
Institute, Inc. / International Code
Council (2003), "American National x x
Standard, Accessible and Usable
Buildings and Facilities".
- 169 -
ANNEX A
Objective of the Mandate
A.1 Objective of the Mandate M/420
In December 2007 the Commission issued a mandate M/420 [EC, 2007] to CEN, CENELEC and ETSI.
The key objectives of this mandate were
The main objective of the Mandate M/420 is to:
Facilitate the public procurement of accessible built environment following the Design for All
principles by developing a set of standards/Technical specifications that will contain
I. A set of functional European accessibility requirements of the built environment and
II. A range of minimum technical data to comply with those functional requirements.
Provide a mechanism through which the public procurers have access to an online toolkit,
enabling them to make easy use of these harmonised requirements in procurement process.
The work in the mandate shall make a distinction between the design of buildings including access to
/ from the building, i.e. the accessibility of the infrastructure, or the accessibility of floors and rooms
inside the building, open venues, civil engineers work and construction products.
It is important to note that the Construction Products Directive (CPD) addresses safety requirements
for construction works. When assessing the need for accessibility requirements related to 5
construction works, all safety requirements contained in the existing standards must be respected.
There may be instances where existing Community legislation addresses accessibility issues, as with
the example of the construction products Directive above, but also in other spheres such as rail
travel passenger ships, buses and coaches and airports. Part of the work carried out under this
mandate is to seek out such instances and take due account of them.
The mandate is to be carried out in two phases:
• Phase I: Inventory and feasibility of European and International accessibility standards in the
built environment
o Team A: an inventory of existing standards, building codes, technical regulations and
guidance documents for accessibility to the built environment
o Team B: Inventory of European and international accessibility requirements and
assessment of existing testing and conformity schemes
• Phase II – Standardization activities.
The first technical report requested in Phase I should cover
• An inventory of existing standards, building codes, technical regulations and guidance
documents for accessibility to the built environment
• An analysis of gaps identified in these areas where no standards, building codes, technical
regulations or guidance documents exists or where the existing standards, etc. need to be
complemented to have a comprehensive European standard. This analysis should distinguish
between
o Functional accessibility requirements and
o A range of minimum technical performance criteria to comply with those functional
requirements
• A proposal for a standardization work programme for the development of two European
standards
o A European standard that contains a set of functional European accessibility
requirements of the built environment making the distinction between design and
products to be used as either technical specifications or as criteria for awarding
public contracts (in the sense of the Public Procurement Directives).
- 170 -
o A European standard/Technical Specifications that describe the range of minimum

technical details to comply with those functional requirements
In CEN BT WG 207 meeting in Brussels at 18 January 2011 it was agreed upon to deliver only one
joint report for both teams including common sections covering executive summary, introduction,
conclusions and all referencing materials in Annexes. The specific inventories, analysis of gaps and
proposals for a standardization programme is included in separate sections for Team A and Team B
subjects.
- 171 -
ANNEX B
History of the report
B.1 Project Team A
Document history CEN/BT WG 207

N XX
V. 01 August 2010 Interim draft developed for Milestone A N 15
V. 02 November 2010 Pre final draft report PT A N 20
V. 01 2011-04-11 Draft Joint report PT A + PT B N XX
V. 02 2011-05-31 Draft joint report PT A + PT B N XX

for Public Commenting Period
The PT A members involved in this report are:

Function Name Abbreviation E-Mail
PT A Leader Monika KLENOVEC MK klenovec@designforall.at
PT A Expert Francesc ARAGALL FA aragall@designforall.org
PT A Expert Keith BRIGHT KB info.kbc@btinternet.com
PT A Expert Peter CONELL PC Peter.Connell@arup.com
PT A Expert Katerina PAPAMICHAIL KP papamikat@yahoo.gr
PT A Expert Elisabet SVENSSON ES Elisabet@handisam.se
For the data collection and country expert reports Team A has been supported by PT B members.
Vice versa PT A members collected also the conformity assessment schemes information to support
PT B works.
B.2 Project Team B
Document history CEN/BT WG 207

N XX
V 0.0.1 August 2010 Interim draft developed for Milestone A N 14
V.0.0.2 November 2010 Pre final draft report PT B N 19
V. 01 2011-04-11 Draft Joint report PT A + PT B N XX
V. 02 2011-05-31 Draft joint report PT A + PT B N XX

for Public Commenting Period
The project team B members involved in this report are :

Function Name Country E-Mail
PT B Leader Isabela NITA Romania isabela.nita@carocert.ro
PT B Expert Delfin JIMENEZ Spain d.jimenez@eqar.es
PT B Expert Søren GINNERUP Denmark sog@sbi.dk
PT B Expert Eoin O’HERLIHY Ireland eoin@accessconsultancy.ie
PT B Expert Fionnuala ROGERSON Ireland fionnuala.rogerson@rogerson.ie
PT B Expert Clas THORÉN Sweden clas.thoren@gmail.com
- 172 -
B.3 New approach in January 2011 – two reports combined to one joint report
Based on the comments of Inma Placencia-Porrero (European Commission) on the pre-final reports
of PT A and PT B - delivered in November 2010 - which have been discussed with the two PT leaders
on 2011-01-17, on the day before the 3rd CEN/BT WG 207 meeting in Brussels, it was decided and
confirmed in the CEN/BT WG 207 meeting on the next day that the 2 reports should be combined to
a joint report with several Annexes where PT A and PT B should refer to. This decision was taken due
to the huge reports and references to the same data collections and documents by both project
teams.
The joint report should be shortened and focusing in separated chapters on PT A and PT B
recommendations and conclusions. All background information, data collection, country reports and
not direct to standardization related issues, conclusions and recommendation are now transferred to
Annexes. Only the Introduction and the Executive Summary are common chapters dealing with both
PT A and B works.
- 173 -
ANNEX C
Terminology and Definitions
C.1 The key definitions of concepts used in this report
Team A refers to ISO/FDIS 21542, which includes all necessary definitions on accessibility of the built
environment.
The following definitions are used for a better understanding of this report (mainly concerning
project team B issues). These definitions are coming from international standards and guides as ISO
17000 and Guide 71 are adapted to the use of this report from other relevant documents.
C.1.1 Accessible design
Design focused on principles of extending standard design to people with some type of performance
limitation to maximize the number of potential customers who can readily use a product, building or
service. This may be achieved by
- Designing products, services and environments that are readily usable by most users without
any modification,
- Making products or services adaptable to different users (adapting user interfaces), and
- Making standardized interfaces compatible with special products for persons with
disabilities.
(ISO/IEC Guide 71 = CEN/CENELEC Guide 6)
NOTE: Terms such as design for all, barrier-free design, inclusive design and trans-generational design
are used similarly but in different contexts.
NOTE: Accessible design is a subset of universal design where products and environments are
usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or
specialized design.
C.1.2 Assistive technology
Piece of equipment, product system, hardware, software or service that is used to increase, maintain
or improve the functional capabilities of individuals with disabilities.
NOTE 1: This can be acquired commercially off-the-shelf, modified or customized. The term includes
technical aids for persons with disabilities. Assistive devices do not eliminate an impairment
but may lessen the difficulty an individual has in carrying out a task or activity in specific
environments.
NOTE 2: The new terminology used in ISO 9999:2007 is “support technologies”. The project team has
decided to continue using “assistive technology” as it is the term used in the referenced
documents.
C.1.3 Conformity assessment
Demonstration that specified requirements relating to a product, process, system, person or body
are fulfilled.
(EN ISO/IEC 17000:2004)
C.1.4 Conformity assessment scheme
Conformity assessment system related to specified objects of conformity assessment, to which the
same specified requirements, specific rules and procedures apply.
(EN ISO/IEC 17000:2004)
- 174 -
C.1.5 Conformity assessment system

Conformity assessment system related to specified objects of conformity assessment, to which the
same specified requirements, specific rules and procedures apply.
(EN ISO/IEC 17000:2004)
C.1.6 Attestation
Issue of a statement, based on a decision following the review that fulfilment of specified
requirements has been demonstrated.
(EN ISO/IEC 17000:2004)
C.1.7 Inspection
Examination of a product design, product, process or installation and determination of its conformity
with specific requirements or, on the basis of professional judgment, with general requirements
NOTE Inspection of a process may include inspection of persons, facilities, technology and
methodology.
(EN ISO/IEC 17000:2004)
C.1.8 Testing
Determination of one or more characteristics of an object of conformity assessment, according to a
procedure.
(EN ISO/IEC 17000:2004)
C.1.9 Certification
Third-party attestation related to products, processes, systems or persons.
NOTE 1 Certification of a management system is sometimes also called registration.
NOTE 2 Certification is applicable to all objects of conformity assessment except for conformity
assessment bodies themselves, to which accreditation is applicable.
(EN ISO/IEC 17000:2004)
C.1.10 Declaration
First-party attestation
(EN ISO/IEC 17000:2004)
C.1.11 Contracting authority
The state, regional or local authorities, bodies governed by public law, associations formed by one or
several of such authorities or one or several of such bodies governed by public law.
(Directive 2004/18/EC Article 1)
C.1.12 Customer
Person, company, or other entity that buys goods and services produced by another person,
company, or other entity.
C.1.13 Product
Result of a process.
(ISO 9000:2005)
NOTE: ISO 9000:2005 denotes four generic product categories: services (e.g. transport); software
(e.g. computer program, dictionary); hardware (e.g. mechanical part); processed materials
(e.g. lubricant). Many products comprise elements belonging to different generic product
- 175 -
categories. Whether the product is then called service, software, hardware or processed
material depends on the dominant element.
C.1.14 Public procurement
Process starting with a decision by a contracting authority to acquire a product from an external
supplier, ending with the signing of a contract with the awarded supplier.
(Source: Project Team)
C.1.15 User
Person who interacts with the product, service or environment.
NOTE: Users may be customers, but often they are users of products, services or an environment
purchased, provided or offered by customers. Employees are users using products and
environments provided by their employer.
- 176 -
ANNEX D
European Framework
D.1 European legal framework for accessibility of the built environment
D.1.1 Treaty obligations regarding accessibility
Article 1311 of the EU Treaty provides for measures against discrimination inter alia on the grounds of
disability. In November 1999 the European Commission adopted an anti-discrimination package
based on Article 13 of the EU Treaty which led to a Directive in the field of employment and
occupation prohibiting discrimination on all grounds listed in Article 13. The Directive on Equal
Treatment in employment and education (2000/78) includes “the obligation to provide reasonable
accommodation for people with disabilities” for trainings and “the provision of measures to
accommodate the needs of disabled people at the workplace in combating discrimination on grounds
of disability”.
An accessible built environment is fundamental in enabling disabled people to maximise their
opportunities in the workplace, and adopting an ethos of Design for All is critical in preventing or
minimising any obstacles or barriers that may prevent that.
D.1.2 Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and other
relevant UN activities
The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol was adopted on
13th December 2006 at the United Nations Headquarters in New York, and was opened for signature
on 30th March 2007. Many countries have already signed the Covention including all European
Member States. It is the first comprehensive human rights treaty of the 21st century and is the first
human rights convention to be open for signature by regional integration organizations. The
Convention entered into force on 3rd May 2008. The Convention marks a "paradigm shift" in attitudes
and approaches to persons with disabilities.
The treaty views disability as a result of the interaction between an inaccessible environment and a
person, rather than an inherent attribute of an individual. It replaces the old “medical model” of
disability by a social and human rights model based on the fact that it is society that “disables"
persons with disabilities from exercising their human rights as citizens.
The Convention is intended as a human rights instrument with an explicit, social development
dimension. It adopts a broad categorization of persons with disabilities and reaffirms that all persons
with all types of disabilities must enjoy all human rights and fundamental freedoms.
Guiding Principles of the UN Convention
There are eight guiding principles that underlie the Convention and each one of its specific articles.
For accessibility in the built environment the principle of “Equality of opportunity” and “Accessibility”
are the most important ones.
Accessibility (Art. 9)
Accessibility appears both as a general principle (article 3) as well as a stand-alone article (article 9)
Accessibility is essential to enable persons with disabilities to live independently and participate fully
in life – it is therefore an end in itself as well as a means to enjoy other rights. Accessibility is relevant
to a wide range of issues for the built environment and infrastructure:
Physical accessibility – buildings, transport, etc. – a ramp might make the world of difference –
access to schools, access to courts, access to hospitals, access to the workplace are essential to
the enjoyment of human rights
Information and communication accessibility – e-accessibility is very important given the
importance of the internet to access information, but also accessibility to documentation
11
http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/institutional_affairs/treaties/amsterdam_treaty/a10000_en.htm
- 177 -
(Braille) or to aural information (sign language)

Considering accessibility in the design of new buildings, web-sites etc might not incur added cost, yet
re-fitting can be expensive.
Access must be ensured to:
– Justice (article 13)
– Living independently and being included in the community (article 19)
– Information and communication services (article 21)
– Education (article 24)
– Health (article 25)
– Habilitation and rehabilitation (article 26)
– Work and employment (article 27) - human resource policies and practices
– Adequate standard of living and social protection (article 28)
– Participation in political and social life (article 29)
– Participation in cultural life, recreation, leisure and sport (article 30)
In the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities12, accessibility is specifically required,
namely in the General principles, in the General obligations and in several articles. In particular,
article 9 addresses, among others, accessibility in the built environment, transportation, and
information and communication, making specific reference to the role of standards to achieve its
goals. Both the EU and almost all its Member States have signed the Convention and, as a
consequence, need to comply with those requirements.
After two years of signage the UN Covention and its Optional Protocol the first countries have to
deliver their states report which may be followed later by an action plan. Additionally shadow
reports may be delivered by disability organisations to give the full picture.
Figure D.1.2.1 - Map of signatures and ratifications of the Convention and its Optional Protocol13
12
UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/conventioninfo.htm
13
http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/maps/enablemap.jpg
- 178 -
D.1.3 Community legislation on requirements for accessibility of the built environment

D.1.3.1 Construction Product Regulation
The Construction Product Regulation (305/2011/EC-CPR) is replacing the former Construction
Product Directive (98/106/EEC-CPD) and establishes harmonised conditions for the marketing of
construction products. The new CPR14 provides more clarification of the use of CE-marking and
introduces simplified procedures.
The ‘essential characteristics’ are those properties of the construction products which are influencing
the basic requirements for works.
In the previous CPD “accessibility” was missing among the essential requirements. In the new
adopted CPR “accessibility” has been added in basic requirement No. 4 “Safety and accessibility in
use”. It will be interesting how “accessibility” will be further explained in support documents of CPR.
More information about recent developments on new CPR will be added after the Open Meeting in
cooperation with EC DG ENTR.
Private sector businesses create economic growth with sustainable development
Last October the Commission adopted a Communication implementing the Community Lisbon
programme with a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment (COM (2005) 474
final). The main role of industrial policy is to provide the right framework conditions for enterprise
development and innovation in order to make the EU an attractive place for industrial investment
and job creation. It is evident that it is primarily private sector businesses that create economic
growth, not the public sector. In exploiting such opportunities, corporate social responsibility and
sustainable development play a key role. Within social sustainability accessibility should be an
integrative part.
Accessibility related criteria for the intended end-use of the construction works?
For the intended end-use of the construction works several essential characteristics to the basic work
requirements “Safety and accessibility in use” have to be considered. The construction must be
designed and built in such a way that i.e. considering ‘Safety in case of fire’ all occupants (including
people with disabilities, elderly and children) can leave the works or be rescued by other means.
Considering ‘Safety in use’ that people with their diversity (including disabled people, frail elderly
people and children) can use the works independently, comfortable and safe without any risks for
falls and slippery based on implementation of ‘Design for All-Criteria’. The implementation of the
‘Adaptable Housing Concept’ would provide living homes for all ages and could help to keep elderly
people longer in their accessible homes even when they are using walking aids or wheelchairs. Less
building of expensive nursing homes will be necessary when people have adaptable sanitary facilities
which is the major reason to transfer to a nursing home. Care services at home are less expensive, an
economic better solution and prevent increasing health costs for caring facilities.
For the Sustainability concept – as already started within CEN/TC 350 “Sustainability of construction
works” – three areas (columns) have to be considered: economy – ecology – social. For the social
area accessibility of the construction work is an essential part and a frist draft on the “Assessment of
buildings - Part 3: Framework for the assessment of social performance” isunder work.
Accessibility more a design and execution criteria than a product criteria?
Accessibility in the built environment is in general is more a design criteria than a construction
product criteria although there are some related products as doors, window with opening devices,
sanitary products and equipment, different floor materials etc. which have an impact on the
accessibility and comfortable and safe end-use of the construction works.
After the design of a building and its official permit at the building authority the project continues
with the call for bidders, and after signing all contracts by the architect or procurer the execution of
14
CPR ref.: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:088:0005:0043:EN:PDF
- 179 -
the whole works starts. This period of the project from the first breaking ground until final occupancy
of the users is the most critical one. Even if the design has covered all needs and requirements for
accessibility according the building regulations and the recommended Access Statement it is often a
matter of less or even missing building control activities that at the end accessibility is not covered
correctly to meet the needs of all users including people with disabilities.
Developing models for building control tools (confirmation with accessibility reuquirments) in the
different steps of the project based on EN standards will help to increase awareness on the correct
execution of works concerning accessibility and is the goal of this project in phase II. The
governments are seeking to reduce regulatory burden and bureaucrazy and have at the same time
more pressure to increase their control functions. Therefore self-confirmation systems, independent
inspection systems and others exists all over European MS. CEBC Consortium has published 2
important reports in this area: Study into “Self Confirmation in Building Control in Europe from 2010
and the previous report on “Building Control Systems in Europe” from 2006.15
New Mandate 473 “Design for all”
The new Mandate 473 “Design for all” will support an overall approach considering all European
standardisation activities which cover also design standards for the built environment which are not
under the CPR e.g. furniture and interior design, signage..
Education of architects, construction engineers, workers on accessibility – a missing link?
In the field of education of architects, construction engineers etc. there is an urgent need to
implement mandatory courses on accessibility and inclusive design. In an online survey to 336
European universities with architectural curricula only 10 % responses have been received after a
reminder. Only half of the answering universities have lectures on accessibility and Design for All /
Universal Design obligatorily introduced.16
UIA – Union Internationale des Architectes has established a WP “Architecture for All” in different
regions. For Europe Region 1 and 2 are relevant and they work in cooperation with ACE the European
Organisation of Architects on this item. Different activities have been started to raise more
awareness on accessibility among architects and within national chambers of architects.
D.1.4 The European Disabilty Strategy 2010 – 2020
The Commission has identied eight main areas where key actions are identified. These areas are
accessibility, participation, equality, employment, education and training, social protection, health
and external action. The actions in the main areas need to be underpinned by implementaiton
instruments as
1. awareness raising,
2. financial support with optimal use of funding instruments in post.2013 programmes,
3. statistics and data collection and monitoring,
4. mechanism required by the UN Convention
In the list of actions a European Accessibility Act is mentioned briefly in the new disability strategy. It
says: “consult Member States and other stakeholders on a possible European Accessibilty Act in
2011”.
Awareness raising on accessibliity is a very important goal and yet started in the built environment
with the “Access City Award” in 2010 where European cities over 50.000 inhabitants can deliver their
applications to be awarded in each year. The Eurocities WG on “Barrier-free cities for all” – where
the representatives belong to the group of major public procurers – are highly interested in the
15
http://www.cebc.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=1&Itemid=2
16
See http://www.designforall.at/Publikationen.aspx: Barrierefreise Bauen – Ausbildung und Beratung in Österreich /
Barrier-free buildings – eduation and consultancy in Austria (including the online survey among Europeam universities for
architects.
- 180 -
outcome of Mandate 420 project and should also be part of this project in phase II due to their
practical experience and knowledge about the implementation of accessibility.
Another private initiative raises awareness among architects which is highly recommended and
needed. Within the “World Architecture Festival” in Barcelona (each year in the beginning of
November) a special “Accessibility Award” has been sponsored by ONCE last year and will be
continued also this year.
D.2 Economic importance
Europe is promoting a “Design for All” approach to the built environment in which all buildings and
public spaces are accessible to all those who use them. In terms of cost, it is well known that whilst
ensuring appropriate accessibility early in the design process can result in negligible increase in costs
for the overall project, introducing ad-hoc alterations to address poor accessibility later in the
process will not only be costly but can also lead to the provision of a less than satisfactory end
product. These limitations in accessibility are likely to be experienced by all those using the buildings
or spaces, but especially by people with disabilities.
The accessibility market is often described as a niche market. However, considering the fact that the
majority of European countries have a population of which between 20% and 37% have explicit
accessibility requirements, it becomes obvious that there is an enormous market for accessible built
environments and products in all countries. In 1999, out of a total European population of about 800
Million people approximately 100 million have disabilities, of whom between 37 and 50 million are
registered as disabled with visible or hidden disabilities, unique or multiple, permanent or
temporary.
Elderly people, just as others (e.g. expectant mothers, persons temporarily injured, etc) can
experience handicapping situations. In fact age and disability are intimately linked and they may
concern everybody at one moment or another during their life.
Table D.2.1 – Elderly in Europe

Elderly in Europe (in
million) Europe
1950 1975 2000 2025 2050
East 21.6 41.4 56.6 69.0 82.0
North 11.6 16.9 19.4 28.3 31.5
South 12.3 20.4 31.6 42.1 46.9
West 21.1 32.3 39.7 57.4 60.8
Total 66.3 110.9 147.6 196.8 200.8
Source : world population ageing – pages 80-87
In terms of housing, many older people want to stay in their homes as long as possible, and look to
healthcare services to support them in doing so. For them, accessible, comfortable and safe dwellings
are essential. Consider the “adaptable housing concept” for all dwellings as mentioned above.
To meet the needs of an ageing society and for all unforeseen situations, accidents etc. which can
affect everyone at some stage in their lives, the concept of adaptable housing should be considered a
mainstream strategy in all new housing projects.
It is suggested that 91 % of European Citizens agree to spend more money in eliminating physical
barriers for people with disabilities17. This level of support for positive actionis important when
17
Euro barometer "Discrimination in the European Union" 2007 on disability matters
- 181 -
considering the relationship between disability and ageing and when planning actions necessary to
cope with the demographic trends. Additionally the current ageing society in Europe, and especially
the generation born around 1968 (“Baby Boomers”) constitute an important market share with an
unequal share of disposable incomes.
D.3 European Projects on Accessibility in Public procurement and in standards
D.3.1 ECA – European Concept of Accessibility
This “European Concept for Accessibility - ECA 2003” is the result of exemplary co-operation between
a number of partners who share a strong commitment to the improvement of accessibility in the
built environment as an essential condition for guaranteeing equal opportunities and full
participation for ALL European citizens.
On this website several documents on accessibility in the built environment are availabel and can be
downloaded: www.eca.lu; e.g.
ECA for administrations
This “ECA for Administrations” is the result of exemplary co-operation between a number of partners
all over Europe who share a strong commitment to the improvement of accessibility in the built
environment as an essential condition for guaranteeing equal opportunities and full participation for
ALL European citizens
Safe Egress and Evacuation for People with Disabilities
This publication is available for free download from http://www.nda.ie/egress or contact
publications@nda.ie
Other documents for discussion provided by different accessibility experts:
- Accessibility audit of old cities
- Special toilets for adults assistance
- Urban planning and accessibility of urban spaces
- Shared space
D.3.2 Build-for-all
www.build-for-all.net. The aim of this EU-Project was to promote accessibility for all to the built
environment and infrastructure.
Build for All Reference Manual
The Build-for-All Reference Manual aims to provide assistance for the inclusion of accessibility
criteria in public calls for tender under the Public Procurement Directive of the European Union. This
Manual includes, in Part 1, a Handbook and, in Part 2, a Toolkit, that can be consulted independently
from each other. Visit also www.build-for-all.net
D.3.3 Stand4All
Stand4All developed and implemented training courses for persons with disabilities and for members
of standardization committees. The project established an enlarged European network of
CEN/CENELEC Guide 6 experts and accessibility experts in the field of standardization. The Stand4All
objectives were:
To facilitate the participation of user organisations in the standardization process;
To increase the uptake of CEN/CENELEC Guide 6 in the field of standardization;
To prepare more users (representatives of organisations for persons with disabilities or
elderly persons) for participation in European standardization;
- 182 -
To help standardisers take into account the needs of elderly persons and persons with
disabilities.
More information can be found here: http://ftb-esv.de/stand4all/stand4all.html
D.4 European Projects on education of planners, construction engineers etc.
Erasmus Intensive Programmes
The VUT Bratislava has organised in close co-operation with the Technical University in Vienna and
other European universities and students (2-3 students from each university) a 14 days workshop
with many lectures from all participating lecturers. Professors and a final project work.
In 2007 the topic was “Tourism for All” and in 2008 “Culture for All”. About 30 persons have
attended each course.
Schindler Award
The Schindler Award is an architecture competition that challenges young architects to place "Access
for All" at the center of their design philosophy. Open to students and schools of architecture in
Europe, the Award recognizes urban designs that are characterized by inclusiveness and barrier-free
mobility for people of all ages and capabilities. The competition is held under the patronage of the
Schindler Group, and is an excellent opportunity for graduating architects to have their designs
judged by a professional jury.
See more: www.schindlerawarde.com
BEST summer courses on “Universal Design – Architecture for All”

This summer course offers the possibility to become acquainted with Universal Design and its basic
principles. Additionally there was the chance to visit the beautiful city of Vienna, sit next to the blue
Danube and spend a weekend on the Austrian mountains. First course was organised in July 2005
and second one in 2006 by the Best organisation and Vienna University of Technology, architectural
department.
See more: http://www.best.eu.org/student/courses/event.jsp?activity=ceosufp
- 183 -
ANNEX E
European Guides and Standards on accessibility
E.1 EN Guides and Standards relevant for accessibility in the built environment
To meet the requirements for accessibility in the built environment standards developers have to
follow the recommendations stated in CEN/CENELEC Guide 6 (= ISO/IEC Guide 71) “Guidelines for
standards developers to address the needs of older persons and persons with disabilities”.(Wikipedia)
The adoption of CEN/CENELEC Guide 6 resulted from a European mandate to the European
standardization organisations, and the European Commission is funding projects to promote the use
of this Guide which contains guidance for the creation and the revision of standards to ensure
greater accessibility of products and services.
CEN/CENELEC Guide 6 has three goals:
1. To inform how human abilities (and disabilities) affect the usability of products, services and
the built environment,
2. To describe how requirements in standards relate to accessibility and usability of products
and services,
3. To raise awareness about the benefits of accessible design.
In 2006 CEN sent a questionnaire on the use of Guide 6 to its technical committees. The results
showed that 3 out of 275 CEN committees used the Guide 6. ANEC decided within WG “Design for
all” to propose to CEN how to take an initiative to change the situation. In 2007-2008, NEN - the
Dutch standardization organisation - and Standard Norge carried out a feasibility study within the
European Mandate M/371. One of the findings was that the implementation of Guide 6 faced some
difficulties. For this reason, NEN and CEN started an action to promote the use of Guide 6, and in
December 2007 NEN proposed the installation of a CEN/CENELEC/BT/WG Accessibility for All. ANEC
also supported the creation of such a working group. This led to the creation of the
CEN/CENELEC/BT/WG CEN/CENELEC Guide 6 Implementation Mechanism. The working group held a
preliminary meeting on 29 October 2008 and its first official meeting on 8 April 2009.
In August 2008, the European Commission published a call for tenders on the subject of "Training of
Stakeholders on consultations on standardization”. The main goal of this call is promoting the use of
Guide 6. The outcome can be found within the Stand4all project. www.stand4all.eu where trainings
for user representatives and standardization experts in Madrid, Brussels, London and Dublin have
been organised and an E-learning tools have been provided for further trainings.
Finding and conclusions:
In the Construction Products Directive no requirements and legal obligations for accessibility in the
built environment is included although forced through the EU Disability Strategy. This may be an
important reason why CEN/TCs are not considering the requirements within Guide 6. Due to the
missing Directive no CEN Consultant is checking the draft standards before publication if all essential
requirements are sufficiently dealt with.
Another reason could be based on the functional requirements stated in Guide 6 (clause 8 “Factors
to consider”). If standard developers are not experts in the field of accessibility they cannot use these
functional requirements accordingly. The ISO/TR 22441 gives little further guidance but is also a very
unbalanced document - in some areas very scientific and others are missing – and not really usable.
Further guidance could be taken from ISO/FDIS 21542 “Accessibility and usability of the built
environment” requirements if incorporated within CEN according the Vienna agreement procedure.
But anyway it needs legal and obligatorily proceedings similar than within the other essential
requirements stated in the Construction Products Directive – now under revision. It’s essential that
the new regulation includes accessibility within sustainable construction works for the social
performance.
- 184 -
See also standardization projects within CEN/TC 350 “Sustainable building construction” where
accessibility is already considered within a preliminary work item “Assessment of the social
performance of buildings”.
In 2004 PT A leader has elaborated a project for the Austrian Consumer Council (with copy to ANEC)
on the implementation of CEN/CENELEC Guide 6 in CEN standardization for the Austrian Consumer
Council (member of ANEC) comparing the scopes of relevant CEN/TCs with the functional
requirements out of “Factors to consider” from Guide 6 which should be considered in the
development of different draft standards:
Project:“Design for All” baseline requirements for CEN sectors and CEN/TC’s – Review of CEN/TC’s
and their draft standards demanding the provision for accessible design based on CEN/CENELEC
Guide 6.
Findings and conclusions:
The previous CPD had ‘accessibility’ not considered in their essential requirements. New CPR
has now included ‘accessibility’ in basic requirement No. 4 “Safety and accessibility in use”. It
will be interesting how accessibility will be further explained and described in support
documents and how it is going to affect CEN standardization work. More information about
recent development in the framework of CPR will be included after the Open Meeting.
Mandatory proceedings should be established within CEN standardization for the
implementation of accessibility requirements.
o Already published EN standards have to be revised according accessibility
requirements.
o Draft standards have to be checked before enquiry stage by a mandatory procedure.
o Either special trained CEN Consultants or Accessibility Consultants (network of
accessibility consultants to be established) could observe this process and provide
technical guidance, comments and proposals before the enquiry proceedings.
Regarding the insufficient implementation of CEN/CENELEC Guide 6 until now it may be more
effective for standards developers to have supportive guidance by an independent
accessibility expert for this technical field which needs a lot of special knowledge.
To speed up the process EC is asked for funding a network of accessibility consultants who
could check relevant EN standards and drafts according accessibility requirements and make
proposals for revision.
This Network of accessibility consultants could also offer trainings and seminars for public
procurers within the construction works area and other interested parties to improve
knowledge and skills on ‘Design for all’ requirements.
The introduction of an independent “accessibility consultant” in the standards developing process
could be a successful, efficient and less costly way to give clear guidance and make comments to the
drafted standards which have to be taken into account by the TC’s on the basis of mandatory
proceedings.
E.1.1 Building design standards
For accessibility requirements no relevant design standard for the built environment exists within
CEN standards. Due to the fact that ISO/TC 59 SC 16 ”Accessibility and usability of the built
environment” develops a new building standard no further actions have been taken by CEN since the
first attempt to work together according the Vienna agreement failed.
Only on an informal level a strong committment initiated by PT A leader and lobbied by ANEC
convinced more European experts to contribute with their expertise in the development of this ISO
standard as represantatives from European Standards organisations.
- 185 -
In other areas within CEN/TCs on buildign design standards where accessibility should be included
only less accessibilty approach can be seen.
Within CEN/TC 33 “Doors, windows, shutters, building hardware and curtain walling” one technical
report exists with relevance for door fittings usable for children, elderly and disabled people. Its
implementation ans use within European Member States should be checked later.
Within CEN/TC 136 ”Sports, playground and other recreational facilities and equipment” (see
8.3.2.2) there is one work item under discussion ”Play for all”.
Within CEN/TC 169 “Light and lighting” the revised standard EN 12665:2011 “Light and lighting -
Basic terms and criteria for specifying lighting requirements” has been published this year. It should
be checked if requirements for vision impaired people have been considered therein.
In CEN/TC 178 “Paving usits and kerbs” this CEN/TS 15209 has to be further checked concerning its
implementation within European Member States. It should also be considered that relevant
standardisation work is also going within ISO/TC 173 “Assistive products for persons with
disabilities” where ISO/DIS 23599 “Assistive products for blind and vision impaired persons -- Tactile
walking surface indicators” has already been published for Enquiry and the voting is already closed.
Within CEN/TC 315 “Spactator Facilities”these standards have to be checked later if accessibility for
all is considered including children, elderly persons and persons with disabilities:
- 186 -
Within CEN/TC 325 ”Prevention of crime in urban planning and building design” several standards,
technical specifications have been already published about building design. The PT A leader has
made some efforts in the past to raise more awareness on implementation of CEN/CENELEC Guide 6
requirements which was also stated in a resolution but not followed by further actions.
The published standards have no requirements according accessibilty considered.
CEN/TC 350 ”Sustainability of construction works”:

EN 15643-1:2010 ”Sustainability of construction works - Sustainability assessment of buildings - Part
1: General framework”
A preliminary work item (00350015) on ”Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of social
performance of buildings – Methods” is under development and should be further studied within our
project if it is usable for public procurers.
- 187 -
FigureE.1.1 -CEN/C 350 – current work programme
Figure E.1.2 - CEN/C 350 – current schedule for work

(more information on www.cenorm.be and BSI-Website: http://www.bsigroup.com/Standards-and-
Publications/Committee-Members/Construction-committee-members-area/M350-
Standards/?id=158921
E.1.2 Building product standards
Overview on mandated projects within CEN standardization are given in E.4.
Enclosed are actual projects described and summarized by PT A leader which will be completed in
phase II.
- 188 -
E.1.2.1 CEN/TC 10 ”LIfts, escaltors and Moving Walks”

E.1.2.1.1 EN 81-70 “Accessibility to lifts for persons including persons with disability”
EN 81-70 “Accessibility to lifts for persons including persons with disability”, Harmonised Standard
under the LD, states that “This European Standard specifies the minimum requirements for the safe
and independent access and use of lifts by persons, including persons with the disabilities mentioned
in annex B, Table B.1.” According to Clause 0.2, National Building regulations may supersede the
requirements of EN 81-70.
According to art 1.2 and 1.6.1 of Annex 1 (EHSRs) ofDirective 95/16/EC of 29 June 1995 on the
approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to lifts (LD):
“lifts cars must be designed and constructed in such a way that its structural features do
not obstruct or impede access and use by disabled persons and so as to allow any
appropriate adjustments intended to facilitate its use by them” and
“the controls of lifts intended for use by unaccompanied disabled persons must be
designed and located accordingly”.
Findings
application various across Europe: EN 81-70 is not used for all general lift for persons
the lift requirements for mobility impaired persons are considered frequently but less
awareness about requirements for sensory disabilities
lift car type 1 should be deleted in next revision or be restricted for refurbishment in existing
buildings only with minor public frequency
It seems that the application of EN 81-70 varies across Europe, despite it being a Harmonised
Standard, which results in different conditions of safe access by people with disabilities. CEN/TC 10
WG 1 has offered its technical view on this issue and made clear that every lift provided for the use
of persons should always follow the application stated in EN 81-70 where disabled persons are
included. It is the application standard for lifts used by persons – but is this the reality in practice in
Europe? This lift type seems to be used more in special buildings for disabled or elderly people as in
hospitals, senior homes etc. than in buildings for public use or within housing. The convenor of
CEN/TC 10 will start an enquiry among European member states to have clearer view on the
implementation of this lift for persons.
In some countries the requirements stated in this standard are reduced to mobility impaired users
only and fewerrequirements for sensual impaired people are executed.
The reason can be detected in paragraph 04. Negotiations in the Introduction where it is stated:
“It is assumed that negotiations have been made for each contract between the customer
and the supplier/installer about:
the intended use of the lift“
In the Scope it is clearly stated: “This European Standard specifies the minimum requirements for the
safe and independent access and use of lifts by persons, including persons with the disabilities
mentioned in annex B, Table B.1.” This normative Annex describes all disabilities included in the
scope of this standard which are
Physical disability: mobility impaired, impaired endurance, equilibrium, impaired dexterity
and
Sensory disability: impaired vision, impaired hearing, impaired speech
Intellectual disability: learning difficulty (reduced understanding of controls)
Not included are combinations
- 189 -
Physical disability + extreme dexterity impairment/size related disability

Allergies
Phobia, claustrophobia
Another weak point of this standard is the small lift car type 1 (1000 mm x 1250 mm) which is really
not the ‘state of the art’ and excluding i.e. persons with powered wheelchairs. In southern Europe
this small lift type is widely used in residential houses which exclude not only powered wheelchairs
but even elderly people with walking aids who could not leave a lift backwards.
ANEC already expressed its concerns to CEN TC 10 “Lifts” which submitted the issue to the Lifts
Working Group. However, we believe that the alignment of the LD with the NLF should provide an
occasion for the strengthening of the provisions on the application of harmonised standards under
the LD. Considering that one of the aims of the NLF is to strengthen market surveillance in the EU, we
call for the implementation of Article R31ofDecision 768/2008 on a common framework for the
marketing of products to the LD to particularly tackle the issue of implementation of Harmonised
Standards and their relationship with (national) building codes and regulations as far as accessibility
issues are concerned.
Finally, European legislation is effective only if its enforcement is ensured. Sadly, legislators tend not
to consider market surveillance when discussing new laws. As ANEC stressed in a common position
paper with Orgalime in April 2009 (see http://tinyurl.com/cx73dw), there is an urgent need for
establishing a European framework for market surveillance in order to ensure the availability of
sufficient resources and a coherent approach to market surveillance activities across all 27 Member
States. This alignment gives an opportunity to introduce more demanding requirements on market
surveillance activities of Member States (such as the need to check a minimum number of products
of a certain kind agreed at the European level) and to agree common definitions. However, this
would be useful only if the lack of resources of market surveillance authorities is addressed. We note
that a study prepared for the European Parliament in October 2009 concluded that most Member
States did not plan to commit further resources to market surveillance despite the requirements of
Regulation 765/2008 (see http://tinyurl.com/ydujk7h).
E.1.2.1.2 EN 81-40 Stairlifts and inclined lifting platforms intended for persons with impaired
mobility
This European standard deals with safety requirements for construction, manufacturing, installation,
maintenance and dismantling of electrically operated stairlifts (chair, standing platform and
wheelchair platform) affixed to a building structure, moving in an inclined plane and intended for use
by persons with impaired mobility:
travelling between fixed levels, over a staircase or an accessible inclined surface;
with hold-to-run control;
with rated speed not exceeding 0.15 m/s.
Findings
It should be considered that this platformlift can be only used by person with wheelchairs with a
sufficient hand function otherwise a hold-to-run control cannot be operated during the long run with
slow speed. A person using a walking aid also may be excluded using this kind of facility. Leaving the
lift car a reverse movement is required which is impossible for elderly frail people in the narrow car
space.
The safety requirements in the Lift Directive are higher than the safety requirements in the
Machinery Directive where platform lifts are considered. For the intended user it should be not a
safety issue to use a lift or a platform lift. Equal safety requirement levels have to be stated in both
Directives for persons with disabilities!
E.1.2.1.3 prEN 81-41 Vertical lifting platforms intended for use by persons with impaired mobility
- 190 -
Due to an appeal from Germany this standard is not yet published as harmonised standard and under
further discussion. In public buildings this facility should be always under the control of a competent
person.
Findings
The same as mentioned above for EN 81-40.
Before liberalisation of building regulations in the MS these platform lifts had restricted permit
requirements for installation. The travel height was usually less than 3 meter – even only up to 2
meter and more or less installed only for adaptation works in existing premises or for individual
persons with disabilities to reach their dwelling. Now the standard allows using these platforms also
for travel heights with more than 3 meters and in public buildings.
Due to marketing competition with the lift suppliers these platform lifts are more often used now in
residential buildings due to their lower costs. The slow speed and the hold-to-run control is a big
disadvantage and exclude persons with powered wheelchair. When the lift car is too small even
persons with walking aids will be excluded. It has to be considered that maintenance costs are similar
than for normal lifts. It is the question if the ’intended end-use’ of these products – as required in the
CPD - usable by persons with disabiilties and elderly frail persons is sufficiently fulfilled. For special
application where the user is known or within existing buildings where a lift cannot be installed a
platform lift may be the best solution to overcome level differences. A European standard with clear
quality, construction and safety requirements with CE-marking is anyway a big step forward
compared with the previous products with different levels of quality and safety.
E.1.3 Addressing the problem of non-compliance with existing product requirements
In order to strengthen market surveillance in Europe, the New Legislative Framework (NLF) was
adopted in 2008 and entered into force at the beginning of this year. It contains, a set of measures
enhancing the functioning of the internal market in goods (Regulation 765/2008/EC on accreditation
and market surveillance and Decision 768/2008/EC establishing a common framework for the
marketing of products).
Decision 768/2008 does not have legal effects for enterprises, individuals or Member States. It is
designed to work as toolbox containing those provisions which are common elements of technical
harmonisation legislation. These standardised provisions should be integrated into new and revised
legislation. For this reason the Commission has envisaged to align ten directives to the new standards
set by Decision 768/2008. In addition to the Lifts Directive also the Low Voltage Directive could be of
further importance for accessibility.
A significant number of products on the market do not fulfil the requirements set out by the
directives. Some actors simply affix the CE marking to their products although these products do not
fulfil the conditions for being CE marked. Importers and distributors do not all carry out the
necessary verifications to ensure that they are only supplying compliant products. Market
surveillance authorities often find it difficult to trace the economic operators supplying non
compliant products, in particular when the products originate in third countries. Member States are
also imposing different obligations on importers and distributors when it comes to ensuring that
products meet the applicable requirements. Furthermore, the actions that national authorities are
taking vis-à-vis non-compliant products (e.g. prohibitions of marketing, withdrawals, etc) sometimes
differ from one Member State to another.
This problem could be addressed by aligning the legislation to the provisions in Decision 768/2008
designed to tackle this problem. For this purpose an online questionnaire has been started
(http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/ipm/forms/dispatch?form=NLF3) for final users or user
organizations.
E.2 Standards related on services for the built environment
CEN/TC 385 project committee “Services for sheltered housing for the elderly”
- 191 -
E.3 ANEC’s activities in different standardization areas according accessibility – Current projects
under discussion/voting
Main areas of interest and activities with different importance for accessibility of the built
environment:
- Child Safety – playground equipment, supermarket trolleys
- Design for All – ANEC policy statement on Design for All
- DOMAP (Domestic Appliances)
- Environment
- Information Society
o Services
o Traffic
Contact Person for ”Design for All”: Chiara Giovannini – ANEC Sekretariat (anec@anec.eu)
E.3.1 CEN/TC 10 ”Lifts, Escalators and Moving Walks” – EN 81-70 Lifts for persons including
persons with disabilities
The author of this report has raised the question within CEN/TC 10 (as ANEC’s representative) about
the application and requirements/provision on accessibility on lifts for persons. After internal
discussions the convenor of WG 1 confirmed clearly that even when a lift for persons is installed this
lift has to fulfil the requirements stated in EN 81-70 which is the only lift applied for persons including
persons with disabilities. Within CEN/TC 10
ANEC therefore agreed to know more about the situation across Europe, especially as far as the
application of the requirements/provision on accessibility are concerned. (Action point 18/13: ANEC
members to inform ANEC Secretariat whether and how EN 81-70 is applied in their countries (eg.:
only wheelchairs/loophole, provisions for vision and hearing impaired people ).
A little questionnaire has been prepared to help providing this information for the oncoming stage of
revision of EN 81-70 within ANEC members. Also other interested persons/organizations are invited
to deliver their answers and send them to chiara.giovannini@anec.eu to provide a better overview
about the real situation in Europe:
1. Name of ANEC member: ………………………………
2. Country: …………………………………………………
3. Is EN 81-70 “Accessibility to lifts for persons including persons with disability” applied in your
country? YES or NOT
3.1 If yes, could you please tell us whether the provisions on accessibility (eg.: only
wheelchairs/loophole/etc., provisions for persons with impaired vision and hearing as
required in the standard) are also applied?
3.2 If not, could you please tell us whether (and which) a National Building Regulation may
supersede the requirements of EN 81-70 (Clause 0.2)?
4. Please add any additional comment you might have (e.g. according lift type 1 with car size 1000
mm x 1250 mm if this small car size should be deleted in the next revision etc.)
E.3.2 CEN/TC 136 ”Sports, playground and other recreational facilities and equipment”
A rather new Work item proposal ”Play for All” – 2010-07-13 based on Draft Resolution C79/2010 in
document N 1558 – has been preparded by Sub Committee CEN/TC 136/SC1 “Playground equipment
and surfacing“ and is under discussion. ANEC had raised the issue before and will now contribute
with comments on available drafts; see some general information out of doc. CEN/TC 136 N 1556:
- 192 -
This document (CEN Report No xxxx2010) has been CEN/TC 136/SC1 “Playground equipment and
surfacing“ decided in September 2007 to develop a document to support the following statement
taken from the introduction of EN 1176-1 “Playground equipment and surfacing”:
“It is also recognised that there is an increasing need for play provision to be accessible to users with
disabilities.”
This CEN Guide will be not a standard it is intended to provide guidance only. Each European country
may have national legislation or standards that override this document. Users of this CEN Guide
should take into account any national legislation regarding the accessibility rights of disabled people.
Scope
This Guide covers open access, professionally unsupervised play spaces. It does not cover adventure
playgrounds or other play spaces which are used under supervision. The intention of this document is
to enable users, to a large extent, to access play spaces use the equipment independent of the help
of others.
This document is intended to be used in conjunction with EN 1176 and provides guidance to those
involved in the specification, provision, and management of play environments. It is intended to help
create spaces that will enable children of all abilities to have the opportunity to participate in
unsupervised play, and with appropriate levels of challenge and risk.
Although the scope of EN 1176 parts 1 to 11 covers only the safety requirements for play equipment
and its safety surfaces. When developing this guide it was realised that the scope for “Play for All“
needed to consider a wider context, covering not just the immediate play space but also provide
information about the broader environment and other access and facility issues.
Frequently, the issue of accessibility is dealt with by making the environment fit the child. For
example, outside the scope of EN 1176 is the need to provide good parking and toilet facilities – an
essential pre-requisite for access by many children and their carers.
This report does not focus on impairment specific issues but hopes to help identify obstacles to play
for any child who might wish to access the play space and think about ways to circumvent them. It is
also intended to highlight any conflicts between the accessibility issue and the actual requirements
of EN 1176.
E.3.3 ANEC’s Study about accessibility of signs and signage for people with low vision“
A new ANEC study shows that the size of pictograms, symbols, icons and text used in public places
such as airports, metro stations and shopping centres should be at least 5% of the Critical Reading
Distance (CRD) in order to be readable by the majority of consumers, including people with visual
impairments. Optimal – but not maximal- contrast intensity should be around a value of 75% on the
white-black axis. From the new study – carried out by the University of Ghent (Belgium), it is clear
that the interaction between size and contrast has to be considered, when discussing guidelines for
visual accessibility in public spaces.
At present, in fact, no harmonised approach exist in Europe with regards to size, character height of
text and symbols, foreground/background contrast, colour, reading distance, localisation, lighting
and legibility of signs used in public places.
Finally, the study draws attention to the particular challenges posed by ensuring both localization
and recognition of signs as they are both essential for independent travelling and mobility. However,
while recognition is acceptable from 5% CRD on and hardly increases beyond that threshold,
localization still improves until 9% CRD.
Background
- 193 -
In the countries of the European Union, life expectancy continues to increase18. In the EU, Eurostat
projections highlight that the share of the population over 80 will increase from 4.1% in 2005 to 6.3%
in 2025 and then 11.4% in 2050. Therefore the “baby boomers” born between 1945 and 1965 will
start retiring, creating a major shift in the balance between the active and the retired European
population.
As a consequence, the number of people with age-related low vision also increases. Problems such as
macula related conditions etc are more and more frequent19. At the same time, people are more
mobile and continue to be mobile until a higher age. This older population will often have
considerable purchasing power and is therefore likely to travel more for holidays making.
However, the layout of our built environment has become more and more complex with the use of
more and more signs and signage in and around public areas and buildings for information, guidance,
identification or warning purposes; and also to indicate directions to facilities such as toilets or
information kiosks. This situation results in a growing number of mainly elderly people with low
vision having difficulties in finding for example their way in public spaces. Despite the obvious need
to care for the needs of people with low vision, no European standard nor regulation exist on the
visual accessibility of signs and signage in public places.
Therefore, ANEC commissioned a study that primarily aimed to provide a critical overview of the
national standards -if available- for signs and signage in the EU countries. This data was checked
against the results of two experiments conducted for the study on identification and localization of
signs. Recommendations were formulated on the size of signs (words, abbreviations, and icons) in
public spaces and the advised contrast intensity between the elements of an icon/word/
abbreviation (local contrast between sign elements and immediate surroundings).
Main results from the study
A literature overview showed that within the EU, a large variability in standards for visual
accessibility exists. The overview focused on factors such as character height of text and symbols,
foreground/background contrast, colour, reading distance, localisation, lighting and legibility. Existing
guidelines for the size of signs in public spaces differ significantly over EU countries, ranging from 1.5
to 6% of the Critical Reading Distance (CRD), from which the information contained in letters or
symbols must be readable for people with low vision. As far as contrast guidelines are concerned,
inconsistencies in definitions and calculations of contrast have to be noted, although there is a
general agreement on aiming at a maximal contrast for signage in public spaces.
Forty-two volunteers -40 persons with low vision and 2 control participants participated in the
practical part of this study. In a first experiment, they had to identify signs, with different sizes and
contrast intensities, presented on the same location in their central visual field. In a second
experiment, they had to search for a specific sign in a busy visual environment such as a railway
station hall and identify it. Response accuracy and response time were measured.
The results with respect to size of the signs in general show that size of text and symbols on signs
should be at least 5% of the Critical Reading Distance. Optimal – but not maximal- performance was
observed when contrast intensity approached a value of 75% on the white-black axis. From this
study, and in particular from the interaction between size and contrast, it is clear that these two
factors cannot be seen independently from each other when proposing guidelines for visual
accessibility in public spaces.
ANEC’s conclusions
18
Regions 2020 Demographic Challenges For European Regions’ – Background document of the European Commission
Directorate general for Regional Policy (2008)
19
For example, it is estimated that there are over 500,000 people with macular conditions in the UK. Macular degeneration
is the most common form of visual impairment in the UK and throughout the developed world
(http://www.maculardisease.org)
- 194 -
- With currently about 13 million people estimated with low vision in Europe and 125 million
worldwide, enabling safe and independent mobility for people with low vision in public places
seems a basic need
- Size of text of signs should be at least 5% of Critical Reading Distance (CRD) for the ‘general’
low vision population but familiarity with signs plays also a role
- It is important to agree on the aim of any future guideline as localization and recognition are
both essential for independent travelling and mobility. However, while recognition is
acceptable from 5% CRD on and hardly increases beyond that threshold, localization still
improves until 9% CRD
- Further research should be carried out to assess the specific needs of people with low vision,
given the considerable heterogeneity in this group with respect to visual acuity and visual field
restrictions
- the place where the signs are situated is also playing a role in increasing readability and should
be the subject of further guidance as it happens sometimes that signs are large but appear to
point into the sky or to a brick wall. The logic of following the signs along a route is also very
important for visually impaired people., with enough continuous signage to help people
navigate around routes
- It should be noted however that the needs of people with other visual impairments such as
blindness should be taken into account with the use of Tactile Walking Surfaces Indicators
(TWSI) as well as the provision of relevant information about public places in alternative
format20
- ANEC believes that the main results of the study should be considered as the starting point for
the formulation of guidelines, which could in time result in a European standard on the
legibility of signs and signage in public buildings/for public procurement, where examples of
good practice are given as an illustration.
The study is available at: http://www.anec.eu/anec.asp?rd=77474&ref=07-01.01-01&lang=en
Contact persons for ANEC: Project Advisor- Prof. Dr. Berry den Brinker (b.denbrinker@fbw.vu.nl)
Findings:
A new Standard for visual accessibility of signs and signage for people with low vision should be
developed.
E.3.4 Domestic Appliances & Design for All- ANEC’s Lobbying for product’s Safety
After years of ANEC lobbying, the first set of revised standards on the safety of domestic appliances
(EN 60335 series) were adopted by CENELEC at its Technical Board meeting on 14 April 2010. The
ANEC proposals for revision covered the following standards: EN 60335-2-2 (vacuum cleaners), 2-3
(electric irons), 2-6 (cooking ranges, hobs, and ovens), 2-7 (washing machines), 2-23 (appliances for
skin or hair care), 2-52 (oral hygiene appliances).
These are the first standards to include requirements for the use of household appliances by
vulnerable consumers. The six parts will set the pattern for further revised parts 2. Their adoption
represents a considerable achievement for the consumer movement and for ANEC and its members
in particular.
However, we deplore the surface temperature limit values defined in the revised standards.
Although the values are an improvement over the former versions of the standards, the values are
not in line with CENELEC Guide 29 "Temperatures of hot surfaces”. According to this Guide, adopted
20
ANEC actively participates in ISO TC 173 WG 8 ISO/TC 173 WG 8 “Assistive products for persons with vision impairment –
Tactile walking surface indicators” (TWSI) and ISO/TC 59/SC 16 “Building construction — Accessibility and usability of the
built environment”.
- 195 -
to support Mandate M/346, the temperature limits in the standards are above the burn threshold
curves and so pose a serious safety risk to children and elderly people.
Hence ANEC again expressed concern at the temperatures cited, for knobs and handles in particular,
during the Unique Acceptance Procedure (UAP) on further standards for the safety of domestic
appliances (EN 60335-2-25 on microwave ovens and EN 60335-2-9 on particular requirements for
grills, toasters and similar portable cooking appliances) in May 2010.
Findings
The work of these relevant TCs has to be further analysed which of the products are relevant for
buildings and should be safe for all users including children, elderly and disabled persons.
Consider also the ongoing revision of the General Product Safety Directive .
- 196 -
E.4 Inventory tables of all relevant CEN/TCs

Relevance to
MANDATE/ PRODUCTS TCs INVOLVED Accessibility CEN Guide FINALIZED/HARMONISED PRODUCT OUTSTANDING STANDARDS
DIRECTIVE COVERED 6 - Factors to consider STANDARD
M/101 Doors, CEN/TC 33 “Doors, Table 3 & Table 7 1. Already cited: • Building hardware -
Windows and windows, shutters and • Doors - Operating forces - Uncontrolled door closing
related building hardware” Requirements and classification (EN devices for single action doors
products 12217) – Requirements and test
• Building hardware (EN 179) methods (prEN 15887)
• Single swing spring hinge
• Panic exit devices (EN 1125)
closing devices /WI 00033327)
• Controlled door closing devices (EN • Electrically controlled panic
1154) exit systems for use on escape
• Electrical powered hold-open routes (prEN 13633)
devices (EN 1155) • Electrically controlled
• Industrial, commercial and garage emergency exit systems for
doors and gates (EN 13241-1) use on escape (prEN 13637)
• External blinds (EN 13561) • Level handles and knob
• Shutters (EN 13659) furniture (prEN 1906)
• Locks and latches (EN 12209) • Internal pedestrian doors –
Part 2: Internal pedestrian
• Windows and doors – Product
doorsets without resistance to
standard, performance
fire characteristics (prEN
characteristics – Part 1: Windows
14351-2)
and external pedestrian doorsets
• Windows and doors – Part
without resistance to fire and/or
3: Windows and pedestrian
smoke leakage characteristics (EN
doorsets without resistance to
14351-1)
fire and/or smoke leakage
characteristics (prEN 14351-3)
2. Not yet cited
• Industrial, commercial and
• Building hardware – Looks and garage doors and gates –
latches – Electromechanically Product Standard – Part 2:
operated locks and striking plates – Products with fire resistance
- 197 -
Relevance to
Requirements and test methods (EN or smoke control
14846) characteristics (prEN 13241-2)
M/108 Curtain walling CEN/TC 33 - Doors, Table 3 & Table 7 • EN 1192:1999 Doors - Classification • prEN 16005 Powered
windows, shutters building of strength requirements pedestrian doors - Safety in
hardware and curtain • CEN/TR 15894:2009 Building use of power pedestrian
walling hardware - Door fittings for use by doors - Requirements and
children, elderly and disabled test methods
people in domestic and public
buildings - A guide for specifiers
• EN 1125:2008 Building hardware -
Panic exit devices operated by a
horizontal bar, for use on escape
routes - Requirements and test
methods
• EN 1154:1996/2002 Building
hardware - Controlled door closing
devices - Requirements and test
methods
• EN 1155:1997/2002 Building
hardware - Electrically powered
hold-open devices for swing doors -
Requirements and test methods
• EN 12045:2000 Shutters and blinds
power operated - Safety in use -
Measurement of the transmitted
force
• etc.
- 198 -
Relevance to
M/109 Fire CEN/TC 70 Manual means Table 5 & Table 7 • Portable fire extinguishers - Part 7:
alarm/detectio of fire fighting equipment Fire Resistance Characteristics, performance
n, fixed CEN/TC 72 - Fire detection requirements and test methods
firefighting, fire and fire alarm systems (EN 3-7)
and smoke CEN/TC 191 - Fixed • Mobile fire extinguishers (EN
control and firefighting systems 1866:2005) 97/23/EC,96/98/EC
explosion • Fire alarm devices (EN 54-3)
CEN/TC 192 - Fire service
suppression
equipment • Fire detection and fire alarm
products • Control panels (prEN 12101-
systems – Part 2: Control and
9)
indicating equipment (EN 54-2)
• Pressure switches (prEN
• Voice alarm control and indicating 12259-8)
equipment (EN 54-16) • Visual alarms (prEN 54-23)
• Loud speakers (EN 54-24)
• Component using radio links and
system requirements (EN 54-25)
M/110, Sanitary CEN/TC 163 “Sanitary Surface Finish; ease of 1. Already cited:
M/368 appliances appliances” handling; colour and • Kitchen sinks (EN 13310)
contrast • WC pans and WC suites with integral • Shower tray for domestic
trap (EN 997) purposes (prEN 14527) …
• Shower enclosures (EN 14428) under appeal from CEN
• Whirlpool baths (EN 12764) Member
• Bidets (EN 14528) • Baths for domestic purposes
• Communal washing troughs (EN (prEN 14516) … under appeal
14296) from CEN member
• Wall hang urinals – Functional
requirements and test methods (EN
13407)
• Wash basins – Functional
requirements and test methods (EN
- 199 -
Relevance to
14688)
M/111 Circulation CEN/TC 50 - Lighting
Fixtures columns
CEN/TC 226 - Road
equipment
M/118 Waste Water CEN/TC 155 - Plastic piping
Engineering systems and ducting
Products systems
CEN/TC 165 - Waste water
engineering
M/119 Floorings CEN/TC 129 “Glass in Colour and contrast; • CEN/TR 13548:2004 General rules • 00067096 Ceramic mosaics,
buildings” lighting/glare; surface for the design and installation of trims and other special
CEN/TC 67 Ceramic tiles finish; Non ceramic tiling ceramics components for
CEN/TC 129 - Glass in allergenic/toxic; • EN 14411:2006 Ceramic tiles - floor and wall tiling
buildings Alternative format? Definitions, classification,
CEN/TC 134 - slippery characteristic characteristics and marking
Resilient/textiles and • EN ISO 10545-2:1997 Ceramic tiles -
laminate floor coverings Part 2: Determination of dimensions
CEN/TC 175 - Round and and surface quality (ISO 10545-
sawn timber 2:1995, including Technical
CEN/TC 178 - Pavement Corrigendum 1:1997)
units
• Etc.
CEN/TC 217 - Surfaces for
sports areas
CEN/TC 229 - Precast
concrete products
CEN/TC 246 - Natural
stones
CEN/TC 323 - Raised access
- 200 -
Relevance to
floors
M/121 Internal and CEN/TC 67 - Ceramic tiles Colour and contrast;
external wall CEN/TC 99 – Wallcoverings lighting/glare; surface
and ceiling CEN/TC 128 - Roof finish; Non
finishes?? covering,Wall cladding allergenic/toxic;
CEN/TC 175 - Round and Alternative format?
sawn timber
CEN/TC 246 - Natural
stones
CEN/TC 249 - Plastics
CEN/TC 277 - Suspended
ceilings
CEN/BT/TF 119 - Stretched
ceilings
M/124 Road CEN/TC 227 - Road Surface finish; colour and
Construction construction products contrast; alternative
Products CEN/TC 254 - Flexible format
sheets for waterproofing
CEN/TC 336 - Bituminous
binders
M/129 Space heating CEN/TC 46 “Oil stoves” Handling, usable
appliances controls
CEN/TC 130 “Space heating
appliances without integral
heat sources”
CEN/TC 295 “Residential
solid fuel burning
appliances”
M/135 Glass in CEN/TC 129 - Glass in no relevant accessibility requirements
- 201 -
Relevance to
Buildings buildings
CEN/TC 339: Slip resistance FprCEN/TS 16165
of pedestrian surfaces – Determination of slip
Methods of evaluation resistance of pedestrian
surfaces - Methods of
evaluation
97/67/EC Handling and CEN/TC 331 Postal Services • EN 13724:2002 Postal services - EN 13724rev: Postal services -
operability of Apertures of private letter boxes Apertures of private letter
letter boxes and letter plates - Requirements boxes and letter plates -
and plates and test methods Requirements and test
methods
2006/42/EC CEN/C 10 Lifts, escalators • EN 81-70 Accessibility to lifts for prEN 81-41
, and moving walks persons including persons with
98/37/EC disability
95/16/EC • EN 81-40 Stair-lifts and inclined
lifting platforms intended for
persons with impaired mobility
• EN 81-82 Improvement of the
accessibility of existing lifts for
persons including persons with
disability
• EN 115-1 Safety of escalators and
moving walks - Part 1: Construction
and installation
• EN 115-2 Safety of escalators and
moving walks - Part 2: Rules for the
improvement of safety of existing
escalators and moving walks
• EN 81-21:2009 Lifts for the
- 202 -
Relevance to
transport of persons and goods -
Part 21: New passenger and goods
passenger lifts in existing building
98/37/EC Handling and CEN/TC 183 Waste • EN 12574-2:2006 Stationary waste
operability for Management containers - Part 2: Performance
persons in requirements and test methods
wheelchair and • EN 12574-3:2006 Stationary waste
with walking containers - Part 3: Safety and
aids, crutches health requirements
• EN 840-5:2004 Mobile waste
containers - Part 5: Performance
requirements and test methods
• etc.
- 203 -
E.5 Inventory tables of all relevant CEN/TCs outside mandated works

Relevance to
MANDATE/ PRODUCTS TCs INVOLVED Accessibility CEN FINALIZED/HARMONISED PRODUCT OUTSTANDING STANDARDS
DIRECTIVE COVERED Guide 6 - Factors STANDARD
to consider
CEN/TC 136 Sports, playground and table 1, 3 and 7 New WI - Play for All
other recreational facilities and
equipment
All kind of CEN/TC 207 Furniture EN 15372:2008 Furniture - Strength, To be further checked
furniture for durability and safety -
offices, Requirements for non-domestic
laboratory, tables
workbenches, EN 15373:2007 Furniture - Strength,
kitchen, durability and safety -
domestic Requirements for non-domestic
furniture, seating
storage, EN 1725:1998 Domestic furniture -
assessment of Beds and mattresses - Safety
the surface requirements and test methods
gloss and EN 1729-1:2006 Furniture - Chairs
reflectance and tables for educational
institutions - Part 1: Functional
dimensions
EN 1729-2:2006 Furniture - Chairs
and tables for educational
institutions - Part 2: Safety
requirements and test methods
EN 1957:2000 Domestic furniture -
Beds and mattresses - Test methods
for the determination of functional
- 204 -
Relevance to
to consider
characteristics
EN 527-1:2000 Office furniture -
Work tables and desks - Part 1:
Dimensions (+AC: 2002)
EN 581-1:2006 Outdoor furniture -
Seating and tables for camping,
domestic and contract use - Part 1:
General safety requirements
CEN/TC 152: Fairground and EN 13814:2004 Fairground and
amusement park machinery and amusement park machinery and
structures – Safety structures - Safety
CEN/TC 122 Ergonomics EN ISO 6385 Ergonomic principles in

the design of work systems
Etc.
CEN/TC 169 Lighting EN 1838:1999 Lighting applications -

Emergency lighting
EN 13201-2:2003 Road lighting -
Part 2: Performance requirements
EN 12665:2002 Light and lighting -
Basic terms and criteria for
specifying lighting requirements
EN 12464-2:2007 Light and lighting -
Lighting of work places - Part 2:
Outdoor work places
- 205 -
Relevance to
to consider
EN 12464-1:2002 Light and lighting -
Lighting of work places - Part 1:
Indoor work places
EN 12193:2007 Light and lighting -
Sports lighting
CEN/TC 315: Spectator facilities table 1, 3 and 7 CEN/TR 15913:2009 Spectator

facilities - Layout criteria for viewing
area for spectators with special
needs
EN 13200-1:2003 Spectator facilities
- Part 1: Layout criteria for
spectator viewing area –
Specification
CEN/TR 13200-2:2005 Spectator
facilities - Layout criteria of service
area - Part 2: Characteristics and
national situations
EN 13200-4:2006 Spectator facilities
- Part 4: Seats - Product
characteristics
CEN/TC 53 Temporary work CEN/TR 15563:2007 Temporary

equipment works equipment -
(unforeseen obstacles and Recommendations for achieving
potential hazard for people with health and safety
EN 1004:2004 Mobile access and
- 206 -
Relevance to
to consider
visual impairment) working towers made of
prefabricated elements - Materials,
dimensions, design loads, safety
and performance requirements
EN 12811-1:2003 Temporary works
equipment - Part 1: Scaffolds -
Performance requirements and
general design
EN 12812:2008 Falsework -
Performance requirements and
general design
CEN/TC 247 Building automation, Easy to handle • CEN/TS 15379:2006 Building

controls and building management and operate for management - Terminology and
all scope of services
• CEN/TS 15810:2008 Graphical
symbols for use on integrated
building automation equipment
• EN 15232:2007 Energy performance
of buildings - Impact of Building
Automation, Controls and Building
Management
• EN 15500:2008 Control for heating,
ventilating and air-conditioning
applications - Electronic individual
zone control equipment
- 207 -
Relevance to
to consider
• EN ISO 16484-2:2004 Building
automation and control systems
(BACS) - Part 2: Hardware (ISO
16484-2:2004)
• to be checked further …
CEN/TC 325 Prevention of crime by • CEN/TR 14383-2:2007 Prevention of
urban planning and building design crime - Urban planning and building
design - Part 2: Urban planning
• CEN/TR 14383-5:2010 Prevention of
crime - Urban planning and building
design - Part 5: Petrol stations
design - Part 7: Design and
management of public transport
facilities
design - Part 8: Protection of
buildings and sites against criminal
attacks with vehicles
• CEN/TS 14383-3:2005 Prevention of
design - Part 3: Dwellings
• CEN/TS 14383-4:2006 Prevention of
crime - Urban planning and design -
- 208 -
Relevance to
to consider
Part 4: Shops and offices
• EN 14383-1:2006 Prevention of
design - Part 1: Definition of specific
terms
CEN/TC 329 Tourism services • EN ISO 18513:2003 Tourism services
- Hotels and other types of tourism
accommodation - Terminology (ISO
18513:2003)
- 209 -
ANNEX F
All documents in inventory
Overview of measures concerning built environment and its elements in the EU countries
[Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the main areas of building elements and building types]
F.1 Coverage of building elements by all types of documents
Table F.1.1 - Coverage of external environments and approaches to buildings, all documents
All documents coverage

External Environments and comprehensive
comprehensive partial none
Approaches to Buildings coverage, %*
Access Routes and Approaches 86 11 7 83 %
Gradients and Ramps 94 4 5 91 %
Steps and Stairs 91 6 6 88 %
Handrails 87 9 6 85 %
External Lifts 44 15 32 48 %
Surface Finishes 55 31 13 56%
Crossing Points, Tactile Paving,
58 19 18 61 %
and Dropped Kerbs
Drop Off/Pick Up Zones 33 26 38 34 %
Car parking 74 19 6 75 %
Obstacles on a path and Street
63 15 18 66 %
Furniture
Seating and rest areas 49 18 30 51 %
Facilities for Guide Dogs 36 6 52 38 %
Signage and Wayfinding (external
32 24 29 38 %
- audible)
59 25 13 61 %
- tactile)
64 21 13 65 %
- visual)
Lighting (external) 35 35 29 35 %
* as reported pr building element; actual percentage may differ
Table F.1.2 - Coverage of internal environments, all documents
comprehensive
Internal Environments comprehensive partial none
coverage, %*
Entrances 68 24 8 68 %
Reception Areas, counters, desks
52 16 26 55 %
and ticket offices
Security Provisions 19 25 42 22 %
Storage Facilities 17 27 49 18 %
Circulation Routes 69 15 14 70 %
Manoeuvring space requirements 69 16 10 73 %
Lobbies 45 17 29 49 %
Internal Doors 72 15 11 73 %
Windows 35 11 45 38 %
Passenger Lifts 73 10 13 76 %
- 210 -

comprehensive
Internal Environments comprehensive partial none
coverage, %*
Passenger Lifts for existing
49 18 26 53 %
buildings
Platform Lifts / Lifting Platforms 51 13 29 55 %
Stairs 78 10 11 79 %
Ramps 81 8 10 82 %
Escalators 21 10 49 26 %
Travelators 20 7 51 26 %
Handrails 78 10 12 78 %
Sanitary facilities for ambulant
disabled people 43 20 20 52 %
Sanitary facilities for wheelchair
79 10 12 78 %
users (Toilets/Showers/Changing)
Sanitary facilities for other users -
e.g. Children, enlarged WCs, etc. 41 19 32 45 %
First Aid Facilities 18 6 67 20 %
Surface Finishes 47 30 14 52 %
Glazing and
53 21 20 56 %
Colour Contrasts 49 24 21 62 %
Signage and wayfinding (interior -
25 23 36 30 %
audible)
56 26 17 57 %
visual)
55 26 15 57 %
tactile)
Lighting (interior) 33 39 24 34 %
Acoustics 21 14 51 24 %
Audible Communication Systems 38 24 28 42 %
Switches, Outlets and controls 51 30 20 50 %
Emergency Egress Requirements 29 30 39 30 %
Refuse systems 14 10 60 17 %
Furnishing (seating, desks, etc) 40 28 24 43 %
Indoor climate 1 5 7 8%
- 211 -
Table F.1.3 - Coverage of transport facilities, all documents

comprehensive
Transport Facilities comprehensive partial none
coverage, %*
Bus Facilities 42 22 32 44 %
Rail Facilities 51 19 27 53 %
Taxi Facilities 33 11 42 38 %
Airport Facilities 30 31 31 33 %
Car Parking (including number,
58 27 11 60 %
dimensions and access)
Parking Control 27 16 51 29 %
Cycle Parking 4 13 64 5%
Table F.1.4 - Coverage of specific building uses, all documents

comprehensive
Specific Building Uses comprehensive partial none
coverage, %*
Office, Conference and
41 23 30 44 %
Meeting Areas
Kitchen/Refreshment
(including bars, pubs and
31 35 28 33 %
restaurants, tea points and
vending machines)
Hotels, student
35 37 24 36 %
accommodation, etc
Residential 41 33 26 41 %
Sport 34 35 26 36 %
Auditoriums, concert halls and
31 37 26 33 %
similar
Education 31 28 33 34 %
Healthcare 31 25 33 35 %
Library 32 20 39 35 %
Leisure
36 24 33 39 %
Attractions/Entertainment
Retail 31 31 30 34 %
Industrial 21 20 52 23 %
Shared space 26 21 45 28 %
Public Plaza 44 15 37 46 %
Waterfront Environments
17 21 53 19 %
(beaches, paths, cabins)
Child Play Areas (interior and
26 29 40 27 %
Exterior)
Judicial Facilities, Detention
Facilities or Correctional 27 26 43 28 %
Facilities
Bank, Post Offices, ATM's 28 30 33 31 %
Laboratories 20 14 52 23 %
- 212 -

comprehensive
Specific Building Uses comprehensive partial none
coverage, %*
Gas/Petrol Stations 4 22 56 5%
Religious 23 24 42 26 %
Listed/Historic Buildings 20 20 47 23 %
Rural Environments 15 16 51 18 %
Ports 0 5 5 0%
Table F.1.5 - Combined coverage of building elements by country/state/region, all documents
Combined coverage by country, state, region

Country comprehensive partial none
Belgium* 71
British Columbia, (Canada) 70 0 10
Ontario (Canada) 68 1
UK (England and Wales) 68
Alberta (Canada) 65 11 3
Nova Scotia (Canada) 66 3
Canada (Provinces and
64
Territories)
Castilla Y León, Spain* 58
Quebec (Canada) 57 7 16
Austria** 56 17 7
Hungary 55 17 7
Sweden 54
Ireland 54 10 16
Denmark 51 12 17
Luxembourg 44 29 5
Greece 42 22 16
Belgium (Flanders) 40 31 8
USA 38
Finland 38 26 15
Romania 35 4 42
*=single document coverage
**=standards coverage
- 213 -
Table F.1.6 - Estimate on potential suitability in public procurement
Number of As technical specification and criteria As guidance for different levels of

documents for awarding public contracts adapting existing buildings
High 114 82
Medium 63 58
Low 70 72
Table F.1.7 - Technical and functional requirements
GENERAL TECHNICAL
BUILDING CODE STANDARD GUIDELINE
LEGISLATION REGULATION
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Functional
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
Technical
Type
Total 64 29 40 36 58 58 50 72 120 119
- 214 -
F.2 Combined coverage of building elements by country/state/region by all types of documents

c comprehensiive coverage p partial or incomplete coverage n no coverage
Table F.2.1 - Built Environment Elements – External Environments and Approaches to Buildings
Belgium/Fl
Built Environment Elements
Denmark
Draft ISO
(England
+Wales)
Sweden
Nether-
Canada
Finland
Luxem-
Greece
Austria
Ireland
anders
21542
bourg
lands
USA
IBC
UK
Access Routes and Approaches c c c c c c c c c c c c c c
Gradients and Ramps c c c c c c c c c c c c c c
Steps and Stairs c c c c c c c c c c p c n p
Handrails c c c c c c c c c c p c n P
External Lifts p c c n c p p p c c p c n P
Surface Finishes p c c c c p c p c p p c n P
Crossing Points, Tactile Paving, and p c c c c c c p p p p c n P
Drop
DroppedOff/Pick
KerbsUp Zones p c p c p n p c n c p c n p
Car parking c c c c c p c c c c p c n P
Obstacles on a path and Street Furniture c c c c c p c c c p c c n c
Seating and rest areas c c p c p c p c c c p c n p
Facilities for Guide Dogs c n p c n n n n n n n c n n
Signage and Wayfinding (external - n p p n n n p n c p P c n p
Signage
audible) and Wayfinding (external - tactile) p c c c n p c p c p P c n p
Signage and Wayfinding (external - visual) p c c c c p c p c c P c n p
Lighting (external) p p p c c p p p c p n c n n
- 215 -
Table F.2.2 - Built Environment Elements – Internal Environments
Denmark
Draft ISO
(England
Flanders
Belgium
+Wales)
Sweden
Nether-
Canada
Finland
Luxem-
Greece
Austria
Ireland
21542
bourg
lands
Internal Environments
USA
IBC
UK
Entrances c c c c c p c c c c p c c p
Reception Areas, counters, desks and c c p c p n c c c c c c n c
Security Provisions
ticket offices p p n c p n p p n p n p
Storage Facilities n c n c p n c p n p p p n p
Circulation Routes c c c c c p c c c c c c c c
Manoeuvring space requirements c c c c c c c c c c c c c
Lobbies c c p c c n c c c c c c p c
Internal Doors c c c c c p c c p c c c c c
Windows c c n c n n p c n c c c n c
Passenger Lifts c c c c c c c c c c c c c c
Passenger Lifts for existing buildings p c p c c p c c n c c c c c
Platform Lifts / Lifting Platforms p c p c c p c c c c c c n c
Stairs c c c c c c c c c c p c n p
Ramps c c c c c c c c c c c c c c
Escalators c n p n n n p n n c p n c
Travelators c n n n n n p n n c p n c
Handrails c c c c c p c c c c c c n c
Sanitary facilities for ambulant disabled p p p n p n c c n n c c c c
Sanitary facilities for wheelchair users
people (Toilets/Showers/Changing) c c c c c c c c c c c c c c
Sanitary facilities for other users - e.g.
(Toilets/Showers/Changing) p p c n n n p c n p c c n c
First Aid Facilities
Children, enlarged WCs, etc. n c n c n n p n n n p n n
Surface Finishes
(Toilets/Showers/Changing) p c p c n p p c c p p p n p
Glazing and Manifestations/markings c c c c p p p c c c n c n n
Colour Contrasts c c p c p p p c c c p c n p
Signage and wayfinding (interior - audible) p c p n n p p c n p p c n p
Signage and wayfinding (interior - visual) c c c c p p c c c c p c n p
Signage and wayfinding (interior - tactile) c c c c p p c c c ´p p c n p
Lighting (interior) p c p c p p p p p p c n p
Acoustics p c n n c n p n c n p n n
Audible Communication Systems p c p c c p c c p p c n p
Switches, Outlets and controls c c p c p n c c c c c c n c
Emergency Egress Requirements c c p c p n p p n c c c n c
Refuse systems n p n n c n n n n c n p p n
Furnishing (seating, desks, etc) c c p c p p p c c c P c n p
- 216 -
Table F.2.3 - Built Environment Elements – Transport Facilities
Nether-lands
UK (England
Denmark
Draft ISO
Belgium/
+ Wales)
Flanders
Sweden
Canada
Luxem-
Finland
Greece
Austria
Ireland
21542
bourg
USA
IBC
Bus Facilities n c p c n c p c n p P c n p
Rail Facilities n c p c c c p c n c c c n c
Taxi Facilities n n n n n n c n c n c n n
Airport Facilities n c n c p p p p p p p c n
Car Parking (including number, p c c c c p c c c p P c n
Parking Control
dimensions and access) p c p c n n n c p P c n
Cycle Parking n n p n n n n n p n n c n
- 217 -
F.3 Statutory documents coverage

Table F.3.1 - Statutory documents coverage, countries part 1
Canada, Quebec
Canada, Ontario
Canada (Federal
facilities;
Manitoba, Nova
Canada,
State/Fed State/Organisation
Canada)Belgium
Canada, British
Newfoundland
Saskatchewan,
Prince Edward
offices, banks,
Provinces
Canada,
(Territories of
airports, train
and Labrador
facilities, etc)
(Provinces of
Nunavit and
(Province
Scotia,
Island
Territories:
Brunswick,
Northwest
Territories
(Wallonie)
(Flanders)
broadcast
c=comprehensive coverage
(Brussels)
(Brussels)
regulated
Columbia
Denmark
Federally
occupied
facilities,
stations,
Hungary
Canada)
Canada)
Belgium
Belgium
Belgium
Belgium
CYPRUS
Alberta
Finland
Greece
Austria
Yukon,
ie Post
p=partial coverage
Scotia
(PEI),
Nova
New
and
n=no coverage
of
Type of document
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
External Environments and Approaches to
Buildings
Access Routes and Approaches c c c c c c c c c c c c c c p c p

Gradients and Ramps c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c
Steps and Stairs c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c
Handrails c c c c p c c c c c c c c c p c c
External Lifts n c c c p c n n n n n p n p n
Surface Finishes c c c c p c c p n n c n
Crossing Points, Tactile Paving, and Dropped c c c c n c p p c c n c p
Kerbs
Drop Off/Pick Up Zones p n n n n n p p c c n n p n
Car parking c c c c p c c p c c p p C c
Obstacles on a path and Street Furniture c c c c p c c c n n p n
Seating and rest areas c c c c n c c n n n p n
Facilities for Guide Dogs n c c c p c c n n n n n
Signage and Wayfinding (external - audible) c c c c n c n n p n n p n
Signage and Wayfinding (external - tactile) c c c c p c c c n n c n
Signage and Wayfinding (external - visual) c c c c n c c c n n p n
Lighting (external) n n n n n n p p p c p p n n n
Internal Environments
Entrances c c c c p c p p c p p c c c p c c
Reception Areas, counters, desks and ticket c c c c p c c n n c n
offices Provisions
Security n p p p n p p p n p n
Storage Facilities c n n n n n n n n p n
Circulation Routes c c c c p c p c c p p c c c p c n
Manoeuvring space requirements c c c c c c p p p p p c p c c p
Lobbies c n n n p n p p n c n
Internal Doors c c c c p c c c c p c p c p p c c
Windows n n n n n n n n n p p
Passenger Lifts c c c c p c p c c p c p
Passenger Lifts for existing buildings c c c c p c c c p c n
Platform Lifts / Lifting Platforms c c c c p c p c c p p n
Stairs c c c c c c c p c p c c c p c c c
Ramps c c c c p c c c c p c c c p c c c
Escalators n c c c n c n n n n n
Moving walks n c c c n c n n n n n
Handrails c c c c p c c c c p c c c c p c c
Sanitary facilities for ambulant disabled p c c c n c n n p c n n p
people (Toilets/Showers/Changing)
Sanitary facilities for wheelchair users c c c c p c c c c c c c c p c c p
Sanitary facilities for other users - e.g. p c c c n c n c c c c c n n p n
Children, enlarged WCs, etc.
First Aid Facilities c n n n n n n n n n n
Surface Finishes p c c c p c p n p p p
Glazing and Manifestations/markings c c c c n c c p p p p p n
Colour Contrasts c c c c p c c p p p n
Signage and wayfinding (interior - audible) c c c c n c n n n n p n n
Signage and wayfinding (interior - visual) c c c c n c p c c p p p n
Signage and wayfinding (interior - tactile) c c c c p c c c p p c n
Lighting (interior) n n n n p n p c p p p p p p n
Acoustics p n n n n n p n c n n n
- 218 -
Canada, Quebec
Canada, Ontario
Canada (Federal
facilities;
Manitoba, Nova
Canada,
Canada)Belgium
Canada, British
Newfoundland
Saskatchewan,
Prince Edward
offices, banks,
Provinces
Canada,
(Territories of
airports, train
and Labrador
facilities, etc)
(Provinces of
Nunavit and
(Province
Scotia,
Island
Territories:
Brunswick,
Northwest
Territories
(Wallonie)
(Flanders)
broadcast
(Brussels)
(Brussels)
regulated
Columbia
Denmark
Federally
occupied
facilities,
stations,
Hungary
Canada)
Canada)
Belgium
Belgium
Belgium
Belgium
CYPRUS
Alberta
Finland
Greece
Austria
Yukon,
ie Post
p=partial coverage
Scotia
(PEI),
Nova
New
and
n=no coverage
of
Type of document
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Audible Communication Systems p c c c n c c n c p n n
Switches, Outlets and controls c n n n n n p p p p p p p p n p p
Emergency Egress Requirements c n n n p n p p c c c n p n p p
Refuse systems c n n n n n n n n n n n
Furnishing (seating, desks, etc) c c c c p c c n n p p n
Indoor climate n n n c p
Bus Facilities c p p p n p c c c c p n n p p
Rail Facilities c p p p n p c c c c p c c p n
Taxi Facilities n n n n n n p n n n p
Airport Facilities c p p p n p p p p p n
Car Parking (including number, dimensions c c c c p c c c c p c p p C p
and access)
Parking Control c c c c n c c c c n n n n n
Cycle Parking n n n n n n n n n n n n
Specific Building Uses n
Office, Conference and Meeting Areas c c c c p c p p p p n
Kitchen/Refreshment (including bars, pubs p p p p p p c p n p p n
and restaurants,
Hotels, tea points and vending
student accommodation, etc c p p p p p p p c c c p c n
machines)
Residential c p p p p p p p p p p p p c c p n
Sport c c c c p c p p p n p n
Auditoriums, concert halls and similar c c c c p c c c p p p p p n
Education c c c c p c n c c p p p n
Healthcare c c c c p c n p p p ? n
Library c c c c p c p n p n n
Leisure Attractions/Entertainment c c c c p c c p n p p n
Retail c p p p p p p c p c p p p ? n
Industrial c n n n n n p c p c c p p p p n
Shared space n c c c n c p c p c c n n n n
Public Plaza c c c c p c p c c c c c n n c n
Waterfront Environments (beaches, paths, n n n n p n n p p n n p n
cabins)
Child Play Areas (interior and Exterior) c c c c p c n n n p n
Judicial Facilities, Detention Facilities or c c c c p c c p c n p p p n
Correctional Facilities
Bank, Post Offices, ATM's c c c c p c p p p p n
Laboratories c c c c n c p n p n p p n
Gas/Petrol Stations n n n n n n n n n p p n n
Religious c c c c p c n n p n p p n
Listed/Historic Buildings c c n c p n n n p p n n
Rural Environments p c c c n c n n n n n ? n
Ports p p p p
c=comprehensive 59 56 55 56 5 55 9 23 24 12 14 29 3 1 8 2 9
1 6 4
p=partial 8 8 8 9 43 9 13 10 13 13 10 7 2 2 3 3 13
9 8 7 7
n=none 13 16 17 17 32 18 12 8 1 2 3 0 2 3 3 1 58
2 5 5 4
17%
20%
21%
21%
40%
22%
35%
20%
3%
7%
11%
0%
27%
44%
44%
19%
73%
None. %
2 4 4 2
None or n/a 19 21 22 20 37 21 63 52 48 60 61 49 5 1 0 1 63
- 219 -
Table F.3.2 - Statutory documents coverage, countries part 2

SPAIN, ANDALUCÍA Statutory
SPAIN, CASTILLA Y
SPAIN, CATALUÑA Statutory

SPAIN, CANARIAS Statutory
SPAIN, VALENCIA Statutory
UK (England and
SPAIN, MADRID
SPAIN (España)
SPAIN, GALICIA
NETHERLAND
UK (Scotland)
UK (Northern
Luxembourg
Singapore
Australia
Romania
Portugal
Sweden
Ireland)
Ireland
Wales)
SPAIN
LEÓN
p=partial coverage
n=no coverage
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Type of document

Access Routes and p p c c p c c c c c c c c c c c c c c p
Approaches
Gradients and Ramps c c c c p c c c c c c c c c c c c c c p
Steps and Stairs c c n c p c c c c c c c c c c c c c c p
Handrails c c c p c c c c c c c c c c c c c c n
External Lifts n p n p n c c c c c c c n c p n n n p
Surface Finishes p p p p c p c c c c c c c c p n p p p
Crossing Points, Tactile n p p p c c c c c c c c c c p p p p n
Paving,
Drop and Dropped
Off/Pick Up ZonesKerbs n n n p n p p p n p n p n n p n n c
Car parking n p c p n c c c c c c c c c c p n c p
Obstacles on a path and p c p p c c c c c c c c c c p p n p n
Street
SeatingFurniture
and rest areas n n n p p c c c c c c n n c p n n p n
Facilities for Guide Dogs n n n n n c c n c c c c n n n n n n n
Signage and Wayfinding n n p p p n c p n n p n n p p n n p p
(externaland
Signage - audible)
Wayfinding n p p p p c c p n c p p n p p n p p p
(externaland
Signage - tactile)
Wayfinding n p p p p p c c n c c c c p p n n p p
(external(external)
Lighting - visual) n p n n p c c n p p n p n c p p n c c
Internal Environments p n
Entrances c p c p p c c n c c c p c p c c c c c n
Reception Areas, counters, n p n p p p c n c c c c n c c p p p p n
desks and
Security ticket offices
Provisions n n n n p p c c c c p c n n c n n n n n
Storage Facilities n n n n p p p n p p n n n n n p n n n P
Circulation Routes p p c c p c c c c c c c c c c c c c c C
Manoeuvring space p c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c p p N
requirements
Lobbies c p p c p c c n c c c p n p p c p c p n
Internal Doors c p c c p c c c c c c c c c c c c c c p
Windows p n n n c n p c n n n n n c n p n p p
Passenger Lifts p p c c p c c c c c c c c c c c c p p
Passenger Lifts for existing p n c p p n c c p n p c n n c n n n n
buildings
Platform Lifts / Lifting p p n c p c p n c n n n n n c p c c c p
Platforms
Stairs c c n c p c c c c c c c c c c c c c c p
Ramps c c c c p c c c c c c c c c c c c c c n
Escalators n n n n p n p n c c c n c c n n n p p
Travelators n n n n p n c n c c c n c c n n n n n
Handrails c c n c p c c c c c c c c c c p c n c p
Sanitary facilities for ambulant c p c p p c p c c p c c n c c c c c n
disabled people for
Sanitary facilities p p c c c c c c c c c c c c c p c c c p
wheelchair users for other
Sanitary facilities p n n n p c p n p p c n n c n p p c n p
users
First - e.g.
Aid Children, enlarged n
Facilities n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n p
WCs,
Surfaceetc.
Finishes n p n p p c c c c c c c c p c p p p p n
Glazing and p p n n p n p c c c c c c c c c p n p n
Colour Contrasts p p n c n c p n c c c n n c n c p c p n
Signage and wayfinding n n n n p n p n c c c p p c p p n n n
(interior
Signage and- audible)
wayfinding n p n c n c p c c c c p p c p p p p p n
(interior and
Signage - visual)
wayfinding n p n c n c p c c c p p p c p p p p n n
(interior (interior)
Lighting - tactile) n p n n p p c c c c p n p c n p p n n n
Acoustics n n n n n n n n c c c n n c n p n n n n
Audible Communication p p n n n n p n c c c p p c p p n p n p
Systems
Switches, Outlets and controls p p n n p p p n c c c c c c c p p c p n
Emergency Egress p n n n n n c c c c n p n p p c p n p n
Requirements
- 220 -
SPAIN, ANDALUCÍA Statutory
SPAIN, CASTILLA Y
SPAIN, CATALUÑA Statutory

SPAIN, CANARIAS Statutory
SPAIN, VALENCIA Statutory
UK (England and
SPAIN, MADRID
SPAIN (España)
SPAIN, GALICIA
NETHERLAND
UK (Scotland)
UK (Northern
Luxembourg
Singapore
Australia
Romania
Portugal
Sweden
Ireland)
Ireland
Wales)
SPAIN
LEÓN
p=partial coverage
n=no coverage
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Statutory
Type of document
Refuse systems n n p n n n n n n n n n n n p n n n
Furnishing (seating, desks, n p n n p n p p c c c c c c c p n n n p
etc)
Indoor climate n
Transport Facilities n
Bus Facilities p n - n n n c c c c c c c c c p n n n n
Rail Facilities p n - n n n c c p c n c p c c c p p p n
Taxi Facilities p n - n n c p c c c c c c c c p n n n n
Airport Facilities p p - n n n c c p c c n p c c p p p n n
Car Parking (including p p - c p n c c c c c c c c c p p p c n
number, dimensions and
Parking Control n n - n n n n n p n c n n n n n n n n n
access)
Cycle Parking n n c n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n
Specific Building Uses n
Office, Conference and n n c p p p c p c c n p c p n p n n p n
Meeting Areas
Kitchen/Refreshment n n p p p p p p p c n p p n c p n n n n
(including bars, pubs and
Hotels, student p n c p p p c p p p c p p p p p c c p n
restaurants,
Residential tea points
accommodation, etc and p n c p p p c c c c c c c c n p p p n n
vending machines)
Sport n n c p p p c p p c c p p p p p n n n n
Auditoriums, concert halls and p n c p p p c p p c c p p p p p p p p n
similar
Education n n c p n p c p p p c p p p n c p p p n
Healthcare n n c p n p c p p p c p p p n p p p p n
Library n n c p n p c n p p c p p n n c n n n n
Leisure n n c p p p c n p p c p p n n c n n n n
Retail n n c p p p c n p p c p p n n p p p n
Industrial n n c p n p p n n n c n n n n c p p n
Shared space n n c p p n c n c p c n n c n p n n n
Public Plaza n n - p n n c c c p c n n c p c n n n
Waterfront Environments n n - p n n c c c n n n n n n p n n n
(beaches,
Child Play paths, cabins) and
Areas (interior n n - p n p p c p p n n n p p p n n n
Exterior)Facilities, Detention
Judicial n n c p n p c n n p c n p n n p n n p
Facilities
Bank, PostorOffices,
Correctional
ATM's n n c p n p p n p p p n n p n p p p p
Facilities
Laboratories n n c p n n p n n n n n n n n p n n
Gas/Petrol Stations n n c p n n p n n p n n p n n p p p n
Religious n n c p n n c n n p c p p p n c n n n
Listed/Historic Buildings n n c p n n p n c n n n n n p p n n
Rural Environments n n - n n p p n p n c n n p n p n n n
Ports
Comprehensive 1 8 3 1 3 2 4 4 4 4 57 33 31 41 35 2 15 18 1 2
0 0 9 5 8 2 7 8 2 7
Partial 2 2 3 3 4 2 2 9 2 1 7 20 22 14 14 4 29 17 2 2
4 9 3 7 6 6 1 7 7 9 5
None 4 4 2 2 3 2 5 2 1 1 16 27 27 25 31 4 36 41 3 5
6 4 4 8 0 9 8 2 5 4 4
58%
54%
42%
35%
38%
36%
6%
35%
15%
19%
20%
34%
34%
31%
39%
5%
45%
54%
43%
67%
None.
%
5 4 4 3 3 3 1 3 1 2 1 3 6
None or n/a 1 8 2 3 5 4 1 4 7 0 21 32 32 30 36 6 41 50 9 9
- 221 -
Table F.3.3 - Statutory documents coverage, all countries

All states/Fed Comprehe Partial None None. %
States/Organisations nsive
Access Routes and Approaches 94 12 7 6%
Gradients and Ramps 101 6 5 4%
Steps and Stairs 99 7 6 5%
Handrails 93 9 7 6%
External Lifts 46 17 34 35%
Crossing Points, Tactile Paving, 63 21 19 18%
and Dropped
Drop Off/PickKerbs
Up Zones 39 26 39 38%
Car parking 80 20 7 7%
Obstacles on a path and Street 68 16 20 19%
Furniture
Seating and rest areas 51 19 32 31%
Facilities for Guide Dogs 38 6 55 56%
Signage and Wayfinding 34 28 30 33%
(externaland
Signage - audible)
Wayfinding 64 28 13 12%
(externaland
Signage - tactile)
Wayfinding 68 23 14 13%
(external(external)
Lighting - visual) 39 37 30 28%
Internal Environments 3 4 3 30%
Entrances 75 24 9 8%
Reception Areas, counters, desks 56 18 28 27%
and ticket
Security offices
Provisions 19 28 46 49%
Storage Facilities 19 29 51 52%
Circulation Routes 77 15 14 13%
Manoeuvring space 75 17 11 11%
requirements
Lobbies 50 20 30 30%
Internal Doors 79 16 11 10%
Windows 37 13 46 48%
Passenger Lifts 79 12 13 13%
Passenger Lifts for existing 54 18 29 29%
buildings Lifts / Lifting Platforms
Platform 59 14 29 28%
Stairs 85 11 11 10%
Ramps 87 10 11 10%
Escalators 21 15 50 58%
Travelators 21 9 54 64%
Handrails 84 11 13 12%
Sanitary facilities for ambulant 50 20 21 23%
disabled facilities
Sanitary people for wheelchair 86 12 12 11%
users
Sanitary facilities for other users 46 21 33 33%
- e.g.Aid
First Children, enlarged WCs,
Facilities 18 10 69 71%
etc. (Toilets/Showers/Changing)
Glazing and 55 24 22 22%
Colour Contrasts 55 25 22 22%
Signage and wayfinding (interior 27 23 38 43%
- audible)and wayfinding (interior
Signage 61 29 18 17%
- visual) and wayfinding (interior
Signage 60 28 17 16%
- tactile) (interior)
Lighting 34 43 27 26%
Acoustics 22 16 54 59%
Audible Communication Systems 40 26 29 31%
Switches, Outlets and controls 53 34 21 19%
Emergency Egress Requirements 29 33 41 40%
Refuse systems 15 11 62 70%
Furnishing (seating, desks, etc) 41 29 26 27%
Indoor climate 1 6 8 53%
Transport Facilities 0 1 1 50%
Bus Facilities 42 26 35 34%
Rail Facilities 51 25 28 27%
- 222 -
All states/Fed Comprehe Partial None None. %

States/Organisations nsive
Taxi Facilities 34 15 45 48%
Airport Facilities 31 35 33 33%
Car Parking (including number, 64 28 12 12%
dimensions
Parking and access)
Control 28 16 55 56%
Cycle Parking 4 13 68 80%
Specific Building Uses 2 0 2 50%
Office, Conference and Meeting 43 26 32 32%
Areas
Kitchen/Refreshment (including 34 37 31 30%
bars, pubs
Hotels, and restaurants,
student tea
accommodation, 39 39 25 24%
points and vending machines)
etc
Residential 43 37 28 26%
Sport 37 37 29 28%
Auditoriums, concert halls and 33 41 27 27%
similar
Education 35 30 34 34%
Healthcare 33 29 34 35%
Library 34 22 42 43%
Leisure 39 26 36 36%
Retail 34 34 31 31%
Industrial 22 23 54 55%
Shared space 26 21 49 51%
Public Plaza 46 15 41 40%
Waterfront Environments 17 23 57 59%
(beaches,
Child Play paths, cabins) and
Areas (interior 27 30 43 43%
Exterior)Facilities, Detention
Judicial 28 28 44 44%
Facilities
Bank, PostorOffices,
Correctional
ATM's 30 34 33 34%
Facilities
Laboratories 21 17 53 58%
Gas/Petrol Stations 4 25 57 66%
Religious 23 28 44 46%
Listed/Historic Buildings 20 23 50 54%
Rural Environments 16 16 54 63%
Ports 0 7 5 42%
- 223 -
Table F.3.4 - Statutory documents coverage - Part 1

All countries and documents
State/Fed Title Type of Entry Exter Acces Gradi Steps Hand Exter Surfa Cross Drop Car Obst Seati Facili Signa Signa Signa Lighti Inter Entra Rece Secur Stora Circu Man Lobbi Inter Wind Pass Pass Platf Stair Ramp Escal Trave Hand Sanit Sanit Sanit First Surfa Glazi Colo Signa Signa Signa Lighti Acou Audi Switc Emer Refus Furnishing
Indoor
(seating,
Trans
climateBus
desks,Rail
etc) Taxi Airpo Car Parki Cycle Speci Offic Kitch Hotel Resid Sport Audit Educ Healt Libra Leisu Retai Indus Share Publi Wate Child Judic Bank, Labor Gas/ Religi Listed/Hi Rural Ports Com Parti None
State/Organisatio document type nal s ents and rails nal ce ing Off/P parki acles ng ties ge ge ge ng nal nces ption ity ge latio oeuvr es nal ows enger enger orm s s ators lator rails ary ary ary Aid ce ng ur ge ge ge ng stics ble hes, gency e port Facili Facili Facili rt Parki ng Parki fic e, en/Re s, entia oriu ation hcare ry re l trial d c rfron Play ial Post atori Petro ous storic Environm preh al or
n Envir Rout and Stairs Lifts Finis Point ick ng on a and for and and and (exter Envir Areas Provi Facili n ing Door Lifts Lifts Lifts / s facili facili facili Facili Finis and Contr and and and (inter Com Outle Egres syste Facilit ties ties ties Facili ng Contr ng Buildi Confe fresh stude l ms, Attra spac Plaza t Areas Facili Offic es l Buildings ents ensiv n/a
onm es Ramp hes s, Up path rest Guid Wayf Wayf Wayf nal) onm , sions ties Route spac s for Liftin ties ties ties ties hes Mani asts wayfi wayfi wayfi ior) muni ts s ms ies ties (incl ol ng rence ment nt conc ction e Envir (inter ties, es, Stati e
ents and s Tactil Zone and areas e indin indin indin ents count s e existi g for for for festat nding nding nding catio and Requi uding Uses and (incl acco ert s/Ent onme ior Deten ATM' ons
and Appr e s Street Dogs g g g ers, requi ng Platf ambu whee other ions/ (inter (inter (inter n contr reme numb Meeti uding mmo halls ertai nts and tion s
Austria Statutory Coverage c=co c c c p n p c n p c c n c c c n c n n n c p n c n c n n c c n n n p c p n p p p n n n n p n n p n n n c n p p p n c n c c c c c c n c c c n n n c n c c n c n n 31 14 40
Belgium (Brussel) RRU Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c c c c n c c c c c c c n c c p n c c n c n c c c c c c c c c c c n c c c c c c n n c n n n c p p n p c c n c p p p c c c c c c p n c c n c c c c n c c c 56 8 21
Belgium CWA Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c c c c n c c c c c c c n c c p n c c n c n c c c c c c c c c c c n c c c c c c n n c n n n c p p n p c c n c p p p c c c c c c p n c c n c c c c n c n c 55 8 22
Belgium (Brussels) TUPE
RRU Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c c c c n c c c c c c c n c c p n c c n c n c c c c c c c c c c c n c c c c c c n n c n n n c n p p n p c c n c p p p c c c c c c p n c c n c c c c n c c c p 56 9 20
Belgium (Flanders) Belgi Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c p p p n n p p n p n p n n p p n n p c p p n p p p c p n n p n p n n p n p n n p p n n n p n p n n n n p n n p p p p p p p p p p p n n p p p p p n n p p n 5 43 37
Belgium um Statutory
CWA of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c c c c n c c c c c c c n c c p n c c n c n c c c c c c c c c c c n c c c c c c n n c n n n c n p p n p c c n c p p p c c c c c c p n c c n c c c c n c n c p 55 9 21
(Wallonie)
Canada (Federal TUPE Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c p p c p p c c c n c n n p p p n n p n n p p p p n p n n n n 9 13 63
occupied
Canada, Alberta Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c n c p p c p c p c c n c c c p p p p c c c c n p p c c c c c c c n n n n n 23 10 52
(Province of
Canada, British Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c n p c c p c c c c p c c p c c c c p c c c c c c p p c p p p p c p p 24 13 48
ColumbiaNova
Canada, Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c n p p p n p p p p p p p c c p c c c c c c p p 12 13 60
Scotia (Province
Canada, Ontario of Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c n p p n p p p p c c c c c n p p c p c p c c c 14 10 61
(ProvinceQuebec
Canada, of Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c p p c c c c c p p c c p p p c c c c c c 29 7 49
(Province of
CYPRUS Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c n p c c c c n n p c c p c c p n c c p c n c c c c c n n c c c c n p p c n c c p n n p n n n n p p p p c n n p p c p p p c p p p p p n c p n n p p n p p n p 31 29 25
Denmark Den Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c p n n p n n n n n n p c n p n c p p p n c c c p p n n c n p n n n p p n p p p c c p p n n c n c n p p n n p n c c n p p n n p p n n n n p p n p n p n 16 28 41
Finland mark Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co p c c p n n n n p n n n n n n n p n n n p c n p n p p p c c n n p n c n n p p p p p p p n p n n n p n c n p p n n p p p c p p p p p p p p n n n n p p p p p n n 8 37 40
Greece Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c p c c p C p p n p c p n c c p p c c c c p c c p c c n n c c p n p p p n p c p n n p p n p p p p n p C n n p p c p p p ? n p ? p c p p p p p n p ? p 24 37 21
Hungary Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co p c c c n n p n c n n n n n n n c n n n n p n c p p n n c c n n c p p n n p n n n n n n n n p p n n p n p n p n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n 9 13 63
International Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co 0 0 85
Building
Ireland Code Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co p c c c n p n n n p n n n n n n c n n n p p c c p p p p c c n n c c p p n n p p n n n n n p p p n n p p p p p n n n n p p n p n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n 10 24 51
Luxembourg Luxe Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co p c c c p p p n p c n n n p p p p p p n n p c p p n p n p c c n n c p p n n p p p n p p p n p p n n p n n n p p n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n 8 29 48
NETHERLAND mbo
NETH Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c n c n n n c c p c n c c n n c n n n c c n n n n n n n n n n n n n p n c c p c c c c c c c c c c c - - - c c c c c c - 30 3 42
Portugal ERLA
DL Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c n p p n c p n n p p p n p p n n c c c c n c p c c c n n c p c n n p n c n c c n n n n n n n n n n n c n n p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p n 19 33 33
Romania 163/ Statutory
NP of user
Coverage mpre
c=co p p p p p p p p p p p n p p p n p p p p p c p p c p p p p p p p p p c p n p p n p n n p n n p n n p n n n n p n n p p p p p p n n n p p n p n n n n n n n n n n 3 47 35
Singapore 051- Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c n c c n n c p n p p p p c p p p c c c c n c n c c c n n c c c c n c n c n c c p n n p n n n n n c n n n n p p p p p p p p p p p p n n n p p p n n n n p 25 26 34
SPAIN SPAI Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c c p c p c c c c n c p c c c c p c c c c p c c p c c p c c p c p n c p p p p p c n p p c p c c p c c n n c p c c c c c c c c c p c c c p c p p p c p p 48 26 11
SPAIN (España) N Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c c c c p c c c c c c c c n n c n c c n c c c c n c c n n c c c n n c c n n c c c n n n c n p c c c c c n n p p p c p p p p n n n n n c c c n n n n n n 42 9 34
SPAIN, ANDALUCÍA Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c c c c p c c c n p p c n c c c p c c c c n c p c c c c c c c c p n c c c c c c c c c c c n c c p c p c p n c p p c p p p p p p p n c c c p n p n n n n p 47 21 17
SPAIN, CANARIAS Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c c c c n c c c c n n n p c c c p c c c c n c n n c c c c c p c p n c c c c c c c c c c c n c c c c c c n n c c p c c c p p p p p n p p n p p p n p p c n 48 17 20
SPAIN, CASTILLA Y Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c c c c p c c c c n c c p c c p n c c c c n c p n c c c c c c c c n c c c c c p p c c c n n c c n c c c c n n n c c c c c c c c c c c c n n c p n n c n c 57 7 21
LEÓN
SPAIN, CATALUÑA Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co C C C C C C C N C C C C P P C N P C C N C C P C N C C N C C N N C C C N N C C N P P P N N P C P N C C C C N C N N P P P C P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N P N N 33 20 32
SPAIN, GALICIA Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co C C C C C C C p C C n C n p C p C n n n C C n C n C n n C C C C C n C n n C C n p p p p n p C n n C C p C p C n n C p p C p p p p p p p n n n n n p n n p p n n 31 22 32
SPAIN, MADRID Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c n c c n c c n n n n c n p c n n c c p c c c n n c c c c c c c c n p c c c c c c c c c p n c c c c c c n n p n p c p p p p n n n n c c n p n p n n p n p 41 14 30
SPAIN, VALENCIA Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co C C C C C C C N C C C N P P P C C C C N C C P C N C C C C C N N C C C N N C C N P P P N N P C P N C C C C C C N N N C P N P P N N N N N N N P N P N N N N N N N 35 14 36
Sweden Swed Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c p p p p c p p n p p p p c p n p c c c c p c c p p p n p c c p p p p p p p c p p p c p p p n p p p p p p c p c c p c p c p p p p p p c p p 22 47 16
UK (England and en Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c n n p n p p n n n n n p c p n n c p p c p c n c c c n n c c c p n p p p n p p p n n p p n n n p n p p n n n n c p n p p p n n p p n n n n n p n p n p n 15 29 41
Wales)
UK (Northern Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c n p p n n n n n n p n n c p n n c c c n c n c c c n n n c c c n p n c n p p n n p c n n n n p n p p n n n n c p n p p p n n n n n n n p p n n n 18 17 50
Ireland)
UK (Scotland) Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co c c c c n p p c c p p n p p p c c p n n c p p c p p n c c c p n c c c n n p p p n p n n n n p p n n n p n n c n n p n p n n p p p n n p p n n n n p p n n n n n 17 29 39
USA Statutory of user
Coverage mpre
c=co 0 0 85
of user mpre
Comprehensive 31 35 34 31 12 15 18 3 21 18 13 11 6 11 13 5 24 13 6 0 27 23 10 29 3 22 12 13 31 32 9 10 28 17 30 13 0 13 14 13 8 13 13 6 5 10 8 8 0 12 1 13 14 9 6 20 8 1 10 3 10 12 9 11 11 8 8 10 6 7 12 16 3 6 9 6 6 1 9 4 5 0
Partial 5 1 1 4 6 11 10 10 8 8 5 1 10 12 9 12 11 9 10 7 8 11 11 7 6 8 7 9 4 4 3 1 5 8 6 9 0 14 12 10 7 13 12 15 3 9 18 13 2 8 1 9 12 5 16 12 2 0 13 18 21 20 15 20 15 16 9 11 20 11 6 5 6 10 11 16 7 9 9 7 5 4
No or n/a 2 2 3 3 20 12 10 25 9 12 20 26 22 15 16 21 3 16 22 31 3 4 17 2 29 8 19 16 3 2 26 27 5 13 2 16 38 11 12 15 23 12 13 17 30 19 12 17 36 18 36 16 12 24 16 6 28 37 15 17 7 6 14 7 12 13 21 17 11 20 20 16 28 21 18 16 25 28 20 27 26 34
No, % 5% 5% 8% 8% 53% 32% 26% 66% 24% 32% 53% 68% 58% 39% 42% 55% 8% 42% 58% 82% 8% 11% 45% 5% 76% 21% 50% 42% 8% 5% 68% 71% 13% 34% 5% 42% 100% 29% 32% 39% 61% 32% 34% 45% 79% 50% 32% 45% 95% 47% 95% 42% 32% 63% 42% 16% 74% 97% 39% 45% 18% 16% 37% 18% 32% 35% 55% 45% 30% 53% 53% 43% 76% 57% 47% 42% 66% 74% 53% 71% 72% 89%
Zoom in (electronic document version) to read the information contained in the table above.
- 224 -
Table F.3.4 - Statutory documents coverage - Part 2

All countries and documents
Data present
State/Fed Title Type of Entry
Extern Access Gradie Steps Handr Extern Surfac Crossi Drop Car Obsta Seatin Facilit Signag Signag Signag Lightin Intern Entran Recept Securit Storag Circul Manoe Lobbie Intern Windo Passe Passe Platfor Stairs Ramps Escala Travel Handr Sanita Sanita Sanita First Surfac Glazin Colour Signag Signag Signag Lightin Acoust Audibl Switch Emerg Refuse Furnishing
Indoor
(seating,
climate
Transpdesks,
Bus etc) Rail Taxi Airpor Car Parkin Cycle Specifi Office, Kitche Hotels, Reside Sport Audito Educat Health Librar Leisur Retail Indust Shared Public Waterf Child Judici Bank, Labora Gas/P Religio Listed/ Rural Ports Comprehe Partial None or
State/Org document type
al Routes nts and ails al Lifts e ng Off/Pi parkin cles g and ies for e and e and e and g al ces ion y e ation uvring s al ws nger nger m Lifts tors ators ails ry ry ry Aid e g and Contra e and e and e and g ics e es, ency system ort Facilit Facilit Facilit t Parkin g Parkin c Confer n/Refr studen ntial riums, ion care y e rial space Plaza ront Play al Post tories etrol us Histori Environme nsive n/a
anisation Enviro and and Stairs Finish Points, ck Up g on a rest Guide Wayfi Wayfi Wayfi (extern Enviro Areas, Provis Facilit Routes space Doors Lifts Lifts / faciliti faciliti faciliti Facilit Finish Manif sts wayfin wayfin wayfin (interi Comm Outlet Egress s Faciliti ies ies ies Facilit g Contro g Buildin ence eshme t concer Attract Enviro Areas Facilit Office Statio c nts
nment Appro Ramps es Tactile Zones path areas Dogs nding nding nding al) nment counte ions ies requir for Lifting es for es for es for ies es estatio ding ding ding or) unicat s and Requir es ies (inclu l g Uses and nt accom t halls ions/E nment (interi ies, s, ns Buildi
s and aches Paving and (extern (extern (extern s rs, ement existin Platfor ambul wheelc other ns/ma (interi (interi (interi ion contro ement ding Meetin (inclu modat and ntertai s or and Detent ATM's ngs
91 Austria Standards Coverage c=com Appro c c c c n c c, and c c Street
c c n cal - cal - cal - n c cdesks n c c cs c c p c gc ms
c c c n n c cant hair
c cusers - c c rkings
c c cor - cor - or -
p c c cSystem ls
p sp p c p p n n numbe
c c n gc ding
c ion,
c c c simila
c c c c cnment n n c c (beach
p Exterio
n ion
n p c n p n n 54 10 21
11 Belgium of user
Belgiu Standards Coverage prehen
c=com 0 0 85
69 (Flanders)
Canada m of user
Standards Coverage prehen
c=com c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 58 0 27
16 (Federal
Canada, of user
c=com DID c c c c 4 0 80
16 Alberta
Canada, of user
c=com NOT
p c c c c 4 1 80
14 British
Canada, of user
c=com c c c 3 0 82
78 Nova
Canada, of user
c=com c c c c c c c c c c c n c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c n c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 65 0 20
18 Ontario
Canada, of user
c=com c c c c CSA CSA CSA 4 0 78
92 Quebec
CEN CEN of user
c=com c c c c c c n p p p p n n c c c c c n n c c c c n p p c c c c c c p p p n p c c p c c c c c c c n c n p c p n p n n n n n n n n n n n n n n p n n n n n n n n n n 32 15 38
13 CYPRUS TSI- of user
c=com c c 2 0 83
29 Denmark of user
Denma Standards Coverage prehen
c=com c c c c c p c p c c c c p p p p c p 11 7 67
12 Finland rk Standards of user
Coverage prehen
c=com c 1 0 84
16 France of user
c=com C P C c c 4 1 80
90 Germany DIN Standards of user
Coverage prehen
c=com c c c c c p n n c n n n c c c p c c p n c c c c c c p c c c c c c p c n n p c c p c c p p p c p n p n n n n p n n c p c n p p p c c c c n c p n c c n p p p n 38 21 26
90 Germany 18040-
DIN Standards of user
Coverage prehen
c=com c c c c c p n n c n n n p p p p c c p n c c c c c c p n c c n n c p c n n p c c p c c p p p c p n p n n n n p n n c p c n p p p c c c c n c p n c c n p p p n 32 24 29
91 Germany 18024-
Coverage prehen
c=com p c c c c p n n c n n n c c c p c c n p c c c c c c p c c c n n c c c n n p p p n p p p n p c n c p n n n n c n n n c p p n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n 26 15 44
91 Germany 18040-
Coverage prehen
c=com p c c c c p n n c n n n c c c p c c n p c c c c c c p n c c n n c c c n n p p p n p p p n p c n c p n n n n c n n n c p p n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n 25 15 45
91 Germany 18025-
Coverage prehen
c=com p c c c c p n n c n n n c c c p c c n p c c c c c c p n c c n n c c c n n p p p n p p p n p c n c p n n n n c n n n c p p n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n 25 15 45
91 Germany 18025-
Coverage prehen
c=com c c c c c p c c c c c c c c c p n n n p c c n n n p n n c c c c c n n n n p p p n p p p n p c n n p c c c c c n c n c n p p n n n n n n n p c n c n n n n n n n 31 15 39
92 Germany 18024-
DIN of user
c=com c c c p n c c c p c n n n c c p p p p n p p p p n n n n n p p n n p n n n n c p p n p p p n n p n n n c c c c p n p p n n n p p n n p p p n p c c p p p p p p p p 16 36 33
91 Germany 32975: Standards Coverage
DIN of user prehen
c=com n n n c c n n p p n p p n p n n p p p p p p p p p p p p n n n n n c c n n n n n n n n c n n n p p n p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p 5 49 31
91 Germany 32976: Standards Coverage
DIN of user prehen
c=com c c c c n p c p p p n n p p p p p n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n c c c c c p p n n n n n n n n n n n n n c n n n n n n n n p 11 12 62
91 Germany 32981:
Coverage prehen
c=com c c c n n c c c c c n n n c c n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n p n n n n n n n n n n n n n n c c c c c p c n n n n n n n n n n n n n c n p n n n n n n p 17 4 64
90 Germany 32984 Standards Coverage
DIN of user prehen
c=com p p p p n n n p p n p p p p p p p p p p p p p p n n n n p p n n p p p p p n n n p p p p n n p p p n n n n n n n n n n n c p n n n p n n n p n n n n n n n n n 1 37 46
90 Germany SPEC Standards Coverage
DIN of user prehen
c=com p p p p n p n p p n p p p p p p p p p p p p p p n n n n p p n n p p p p p n n n p p p p n n p p p n n n n n n n n n n n c p n n n p n n n p n n n n n n n n n 1 38 45
90 Germany Techni Standards Coverage
DIN- of user prehen
c=com n n n n n n n p n n n n n n n n p p p p p p p p p n n n p p n n p p p p n p p p p p p p p p p p p n n n p p n p p p p p p p p p p n n n n n n p p p n p p p n 0 46 39
91 Germany Fachb
BGR Standards of user
Coverage prehen
c=com n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n p n p n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n c n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n p n n p n p n p n n n p n n n n n n n n n n c c n n n 3 7 75
91 Germany 181
GUV-I of user
c=com n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n c c n n c n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n p p p p n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n 3 4 78
91 Germany 8527 Standards Coverage
RILSA of user prehen
c=com c p p n n p c n n n n n c c c n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n p p p p p p p p p n c c c c p n p n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n 9 14 62
91 Germany 2010
EFA of user
c=com c c c c n n c c c c n n c c c c p n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n c c c c c p p n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n 17 3 65
91 Germany 2002
RASt of user
c=com c c c c n n c c c c n n c c c c p n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n c c c c c p p n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n 17 3 65
14 Germany 06
FGSV of user
c=com n p p 0 2 83
91 Germany under
Deutsc Standards of user
Coverage prehen
c=com c c c c c c c c p p c n c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c n c n n p n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n c n n n n n n n n n n 49 3 33
15 Germany he of user
Richtli Standards Coverage prehen
c=com c c c c 4 0 81
13 Greece nie für Standards Coverage
of user prehen
c=com c c 2 0 83
11 Hungary of user
c=com 0 0 85
11 Internatio of user
c=com 0 0 85
11 nal
Ireland of user
c=com 0 0 85
92 ISO ISO of user
c=com c c c yes/no p p p p c c c c n p c p c c p n c c c c c c p p c c c c c p c c n p c c p c c p p p c c n c p n p p p p p n p p p n p p p p p n p p p n n n p p p p n p n 32 37 17
17 Luxembou FDIS
Luxem Standards of user
Coverage prehen
c=com c c c c c p 5 1 79
11 rg
NETHERLA bourg
NETHE Standards of user
Coverage prehen
c=com 0 0 85
89 ND
Singapore RLAND Standards of user
Coverage prehen
c=com c c c c p c c c c p n p c p n p c n c p p p p n c n n c c p p c c c c n n n n p c n n n p n n p n n p n c n n p c n c c n p p p c c n n n n c p p n n n n c 27 21 37
11 SPAIN SPAIN Standards of user
Coverage prehen
c=com 0 0 85
20 SPAIN Standards of user
Coverage prehen
c=com c c c c c c c c c 9 0 76
11 (España)
SPAIN, of user
c=com 0 0 85
11 ANDALUCÍ
SPAIN, of user
c=com 0 0 85
11 CANARIAS
SPAIN, of user
c=com 0 0 85
11 CASTILLA Y
SPAIN, of user
c=com 0 0 85
11 CATALUÑA
SPAIN, of user
c=com 0 0 85
11 GALICIA
SPAIN, of user
c=com 0 0 85
11 MADRID
SPAIN, of user
c=com 0 0 85
20 VALENCIA
Sweden of user
Swede Standards Coverage prehen
c=com c c c c p c p p p 5 4 76
91 n
SwitzerlandNorm Standards of user
Coverage prehen
c=com c c c c c c n n c c n n p p p n c c p p c c c c p c c c c c p p c n n n n c c c c c c c c c c p p c n p p c p p n c c c n p c c n c p c p n n n p c p p p c c p 42 22 21
35 SIA
SwitzerlandNorms of user
c=com c c c c n p p p c p p n p p p p n n p p n p p p 5 14 66
91 UK VSS of user
c=com c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c n p c c c c c c c c c c p p c c c c p p c c c c c c p c c p p c p p p p c c n c c c p c c c c c c c c n n n n p c c p p p n 56 17 12
91 (England
UK of user
c=com c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c n p c c c c c c c c c c p p c c c c p p c c c c c c p c c p p c p p p p c c n c c c p c c c c c c c c n n n n p c c p p p n 56 17 12
90 (Northern
UK of user
c=com c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c n p c c c c c c c c c c p p c c c c p p c c c c c c p c c p p c p p p p c c n c c c p c c c c c c c c n n n n p c c p p p n 55 17 13
11 (Scotland)
USA of user
c=com 0 0 85
of user prehen
Comprehensive 23 24 25 22 17 11 14 12 19 13 8 7 13 20 20 9 14 14 3 5 16 17 16 15 12 16 9 9 16 15 6 7 17 10 15 5 3 8 11 11 5 13 15 7 5 7 14 5 6 8 0 9 12 8 14 14 4 3 8 11 7 4 8 6 5 6 8 8 8 3 1 9 2 8 10 11 4 1 2 2 1 0
Partial 6 4 3 3 1 14 2 8 7 4 6 3 7 8 7 12 9 5 10 13 6 6 6 5 3 3 8 1 4 5 5 4 4 7 4 6 5 11 6 6 8 11 9 14 7 9 10 12 5 10 1 5 7 9 6 11 8 9 5 7 9 11 9 8 7 5 5 5 3 3 5 3 3 7 8 6 5 10 8 8 5 0
No or n/a 27 29 29 31 39 32 41 37 31 40 43 47 37 29 30 36 34 38 44 39 35 34 35 37 42 38 40 47 37 37 46 46 36 40 38 46 49 38 40 40 44 33 33 36 45 41 33 40 46 39 56 43 38 40 37 32 45 45 44 39 41 42 40 43 45 46 44 44 44 51 51 45 52 42 39 40 47 46 46 46 51 57
No, % 48% 51% 51% 55% 68% 56% 72% 65% 54% 70% 75% 82% 65% 51% 53% 63% 60% 67% 77% 68% 61% 60% 61% 65% 74% 67% 70% 82% 65% 65% 81% 81% 63% 70% 67% 81% 86% 67% 70% 70% 77% 58% 58% 63% 79% 72% 58% 70% 81% 68% 98% 75% 67% 70% 65% 56% 79% 79% 77% 68% 72% 74% 70% 75% 79% 81% 77% 77% 80% 89% 89% 79% 91% 74% 68% 70% 84% 81% 82% 82% 89% 100%
Zoom in (electronic document version) to read the information contained in the table above.
- 225 -
ANNEX G
National Status reports of existing legislation, standards, guides on accessibility requirements of
the built environment
Table G.1 - Overview on European and International countries, CEN, ISO etc.
with responsible rapporteurs from PT A and PT B
EU member states Inventory/Spreadsheet Country Report – PT A Checklist - PT B

Austria: Monika A. Klenovec Monika A. Klenovec Monika A. Klenovec
Flanders.public build
Kathleen Polders Kathleen Polders
(Kpol)
Belgium:
Wallonia (ANLH)
S. Herman S. Herman
S. Herman
Bulgaria:
Cyprus: Katerina Papamichail Clelia Petridou Clelia Petridou
Libor Dupal
Czech Republic Ondřej Folk / Dagmar
Lanzova
Denmark: Soren Ginnerup Soren Ginnerup
Estonia: Clas Thoren
Maija Könkkölä
Finland: Maija Könkkölä Maija Könkkölä
Elisabet Svensson
France: Eric Gaussorgues Eric Gaussorgues
Germany: Dr. Volker Sieger Dr. Volker Sieger Dr. Volker Sieger
Greece: Katerina Papamichail Katerina Papamichal Katerina Papamichail
Hungary: Mónika Parti Mónika Parti Mónika Parti
Eoin O’Herlihy Eoin O’Herlihy Eoin O’Herlihy
Ireland:
Fionnuala Rogerson Fionnuala Rogerson Fionnuala Rogerson
Paola Bucciarelli
Italy:
Mitzi Bollani
Latvia: Clas Thoren
Lithuania: Kristina Smailyte Clas Thoren
Silvio Sagramola Silvio Sagramola
Luxembourg:
Yannick Breuer Yannick Breuer
Malta: Dr. Joseph Spiteri
Netherlands: Delfin Jimenez Delfin Jimenez Delfin Jimenez
Ewa Kuryłowicz
Poland:
Chiara Giovannini
Pedro Homem de
Pedro Homem de
Portugal: Gouveia
Gouveia
Natalia Giorgi
Romania: Isabela Nita Isabela Nita Isabela Nita
Slovakia: Branislav Mamojka
Slovenia: ---
Spain: Francesc Aragall Francesc Aragall Delfin Jimenez
Sweden: Elisabet Svensson Elisabet Svensson Clas Thoren
Keith Bright Keith Bright Keith Bright
UK:
Peter Connell Peter Connell Peter Connell
EFTA Countries
Liechtenstein:
Rudolph Brynn
Norway: Rudolph Brynn Rudolph Brynn
Elisabet Svensson
- 226 -
Switzerland: Joe Manser Joe Manser

International
countries
USA: Peter Connell Peter Connell
Australia: Murray Mountain Murray Mountain
Betty Dion Betty Dion
Canada:
Bob Topping Bob Topping
Singapore: Keith Bright
South Africa Keith Bright
General EU Docs,
legislation
TSI PRM legislation: Soren Ginnerup
Monika A. Klenovec
CEN/TCs + ENs
Eoin O’Herlihy
International Docs
ISO/FDIS 21542 Soren Ginnerup
International Build. Peter Connell
Code
- 227 -
G.1 Country Expert Report Form

Project Team A
Country Report: _____________________________
Rapporteur/Informant: _____________________________________ (Name)
_____________________________________ (Email)
The following questions are intended as a guide for national rapporteurs/experts to make a1 -2page
report (WORD document) “…highlighting the country’s existing regulations, standards, technical reports,
procurement, training + education of architects and construction engineers, etc.” The bullet points are
giving you examples and questions.
State Legislation with accessibility requirements (technical or functional)
History (- development concerning legislation on accessibility for people with disabilities
and others).
Authorities responsible for legislation on accessibility in the built environment
Building Regulations
Describe also the relationship between legislation and implementation of accessibility in
practice – is there a clear follow-up, where are the gaps, if any?
Any activities to improve accessibility of existing buildings available if under
refurbishment or adaptation? – with equal or lower requirements as for new buildings?
Standards/Technical Reports/CEN/CLC Guide 6 implemented in national standardization?
Has the National Standards Organisation published accessibility standards for
construction, built environment or building products?
Are these standards in line with the functional requirements of CEN/CENELEC Guide 6
Other Bodies involved in accessibility of the built environment
Production of accessibility design guidelines?
Co-operation structures between relevant public & private bodies and NGOs
Bodies that are checking conformity with legislation (public and others).
Public Procurement implementation
Is there a legislated procedure for procurement concerning accessibility of the built
environment?
Are new building projects with work places, offices, shops etc. in general now accessible
in your country – and to what extent?
Conformance Assessment Schemes
In which stages of the building process are conformity assessment schemes available and
introduced?
Which bodies are involved? (see d)
Education/Training of architects, construction engineers, public procurers etc.
Describe the level /type of education in this field for architects and engineers, and general
availability of expertise in accessibility
Facultative or obligatorily introduced in the curricula for different professionals?
- 228 -
Implementation of UN Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: action plans?

Have there been already in the past “accessibility action plans”
Are there any new actions / policies to implement accessibility in the near future at
national or regional level?
Awareness/Awards/Funds to improve implementation of accessibility in the built environment,
see here some examples
Any public funds available for new (and existing) multi-level housing, single apartment
and/or family single homes to improve accessibility etc.
Are there any activities for existing buildings to improve accessibility?
Awards available which are considering accessibility in the built environment as a single
subject or as a strategy for sustainability?
Conclusion regarding accessibility in the built environment
Highlight good practices in the country
Highlight weak points and gaps in the general situation
Where are the most important starting points for improvement in the expert’s opinion?
Any activities to improve the existing building stock according accessibility – perhaps also
in a sustainable built environment?
Date:___________________________
G.2 European Member States

G.2.1 Austria
Rapporteur/Informant: Arch. DI Monika A. Klenovec [klenovec@designforall.at]
Since 1997 a strong commitment in the state constitution exists (similar than in all other countries):
“No one shall be discriminated due to his disability. The Republic (Federation, countries, municipalities
and villages) commits themselves to ensure the equal treatment of disabled and non-disabled persons
in all spheres of every day life.”
What was missing over the years until 2006 was a legal ordinance or regulation how this has to be
fulfilled in detail and how it can be claimed for at the court if not fulfilled. This lack was closed in
January 2006 with the Federal equal treatment legislation for disabled persons and with the
implementation of the Public Procurement Directive.
As a first step a mediation procedure (reconciliation process) is fixed in the Federal equal treatment
legislation. If this procedure gives no satisfying result the way to the court is open.
Design of streets, railway stations, airports etc. on the one side and employee protections legislation
and anti-discrimination legislation on the other side is regulated on an equal basis for all federal
countries with states legislation. All other building uses are under the responsibility of the local
building regulation.
Public procurement regulation is widely used for every building project but not always linked to
detailed technical accessibility requirements which are mostly based on the local building regulation.
Until December 2007 each federal country in Austria has its own way to handle accessibility in their
building regulation – Austria had nine different building regulations.
- 229 -
OIB – the Austrian Institute of Construction – was founded by the nine federal countries of Austria to
take over responsibility in the European building harmonization process based on the Construction
Product Directive, on the ‘New Approach’ concept and to represent the interests of the nine Austrian
countries in all relevant committees of the European Commission. OIB is the notified body for
European Technical Approvals, member within EOTA, member in the Standing Committee on
Construction and in the Preparatory Group where Mandates for harmonised European technical
specification will be negotiated.
As a milestone harmonised building regulations have been developed following a similar concept
than in the Construction Products Directive with the 6 essential requirements. These 6 Guidelines
have detailed technical requirements with strong references to different Austrian standards
included.
One umbrella document describes the 6 minimum functional requirements; e.g. in the clause of
accessibility the different use of buildings which have to be accessible are listed – very similar as
within the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities:
1. Mechanical Resistance and Stability
2. Safety in case of Fire
3. Hygiene, Health and the Environment
4. Safety in Use
5. Protection against Noise
6. Energy Economy and Heat Retention
While in the Construction Products Directive accessibility is not mentioned this important theme has
been added as one clause to the usability requirements within Guideline 4.
Until now 5 (6) federal countries have introduced these OIB-Guidelines within their building
regulations: Vienna, Burgenland, Upper Austria, Tirol, Vorarlberg (Styria will follow soon). Within
Guideline 4 “Usability and accessibility in the built environment” we find strong references to
different clauses of ÖNORM B 1600 which is the main accessibility standard in Austria. Accessible
parking areas, ramps, entrances and doors, horizontal paths, manoeuvering areas, vertical paths as
lifts, stairs, sanitary facilities and equipment, rooms for different use, outdoor areas and signage,
2sense principle, adaptable housing, tourism facilities and housing is herein described. On an indirect
way the content of the voluntary standard becomes obligatorily. Anyway each standard is for
architects, planners etc. ‘state of the art’ and fulfilment is often required in procurement
proceedings. In Vienna the architect has to confirm that he has fulfilled accessibility requirements
within their design during the application of the building permit. At the completion of the work a civil
engineer has to confirm again that the principles of accessibility have been considered. After some
years of experience this seems to be a weak tool to improve accessibility and not very effective. Until
now no one go to the court and claime for their rights.
3 countries have now different ways to handle accessibility in the built environment in their building
regulation.
The increasing reduction of survey and control mechanism by building regulation officers according
the change to government “light” (lack of manpower and resources) transfers the awareness and
responsibility to architects, planners and building construction firms. In Vienna architects have to
give a confirmation about the fulfilment of accessibility requirements in their design before they
deliver their design plans to claim for the building permit. At the end of the building process they or
civil engineers confirm in a final notice of performance that everything has been executed according
the accessibility requirements along the building permit procedure – which is not always the case
and depending on education and expertise of the involved companies and designers. If nobody
claims first in a reconciliation process and finally at the court afterwards about less accessibility
nothing will happen.
- 230 -
Another point is existing buildings. More or less the same accessibility requirements should be
incorporated as in new buildings. But if only minor adoptions will be done only a building
announcement has to be delivered and no further control mechanism starts. In big refurbishment
and adaptation projects the same procedure is required to get a building permit than in new
buildings.
Standards/Technical Reports/CEN/CLC Guide 6 implemented in national standardization
Many standards are available for accessible buildings. Since 1977 ÖNORM B 1600 for barrier free
buildings is on the market with different revisions. This standard is added by ÖNORM B 1601 for
special buildings and institutions for disabled persons, ÖNORM B 1602 Barrier free education
facilities, ÖNORM B 1603 Barrier free tourism facilities,
ÖNORM V 2100 Series for persons with vision impairment or blind persons concerning walking
guiding lines system, protection for the construction sites etc.
The department of accessible buildings in Graz has elaborated excellent brochures for the
accessibility of the built environment based on ÖNORM B 1600 which is widely used in Austria.
Additional leaflets have been published to different subjects as emergency routes for disabled
persons, adaptable housing, accessible swimming pools, saunas, supported by leaflet about
accessible toilets, accessible platform lifts, accessible lifts, playgrounds for all children elaborated by
the Austrian network of accessibility consultants.
For accessible housing the association “design for all” has published a brochure which gives positive
images and photo on the implementation of accessibility in family homes – also based on ÖNORM B
1600.
According employment protection legislation it has to be considered that every company, office with
more than 25 employees has to employ one disabled person. If they do not fulfil this requirement
they have to pay for each not-employed disabled person 230 €/day! According employment’s
protection legislation and equal treatment legislation owners of companies, offices, shops etc. have
to look ahead for accessibility of the built environment. When at the moment no disabled person is
in the company employed the toilet can be made adaptable for later times. But if this is a public used
building than in any case an accessible toilet has to be provided according the amount of users of the
building. Accessibility of the main entrance, way to the lifts, lift size etc. have to fulfil accessibility
requirements.
In federal school buildings accessibility requirements are introduced sufficiently.
---
It clearly shows that education really is an important issue concerning architects, building engineers
etc. and for professionals in the whole building execution process as plumbers, carpenters, paviours
etc.
An institute for social services has been established to consult architects and consumers (elderly frail
persons, disabled persons etc.) about accessibility requirements and good practices. They organize
also the works for private users in their adaptation projects with established professional teams
supervised by the institute.
Implementation of UN Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: action plans
---
- 231 -
Awareness/Awards/Funds to improve implementation of accessibility in the built environment

Public funds for multi-level housing and single family homes is an important strategic tool of the
country’s government for implementation higher technical requirements for accessibility, adaptable
housing etc. (based on ÖNORM B 1600, the Austrian accessibility standard).
In the most western federal country Vorarlberg since many years different activities have been
developed to improve accessibility of the existing built environment:
Since 18 years every second year a special building award for good practices of accessible building
sites is organized, well known by the architects. This award improves awareness on accessibility
among architects amazingly.
Another project is the “accessible village/city for all users”. Numerous of villages and cities are
participating in this project about more than 15 years. Awareness has also reached consumers, shop
owners etc. due to the communication in the local magazines. Step by step all public buildings are
adapted accessible and gives guidance and good practices to the inhabitants – even when they built
their single family houses.
In Graz, Styria there is a project table for housing projects established in the government where
architect can discuss their project before they claim for a building permit to get all necessary
information and guidance in one place. Accessibility is of course also an issue in this process.
Government experts receive due to this discussions and negotiations also training on good
accessibility solutions and requirements and on information about emergency exits etc..
“Design for all” presents during this year in 3 exhibitions six different smart bathing facilities, well
designed and accessible: one adaptable bathroom, one compact small bath room and one wellness
bathing area, one accessible public toilet with baby changing facility and two hotel bathing rooms
one in light version and one fully equipped for a user in a wheelchair.
In the largest park of prefabricated housed in south of Vienna “Blue Lagoon” a new project is started:
one accessible house to show the advantages of accessibility and the smart design for all users to
improve awareness of users and consumers.
Missing link and gaps:
Education of architect, etc. – only 15 % have learnt about accessibility solutions and
requirements during their studies
Legislation should be better harmonised.
Consulting for consumers and architects, building engineers etc. is an essential issue.
Action plan is under preparation (next year)
Funds are effective tools to increase accessibility
Control is necessary by consultants or governmental representatives also at the end of the
execution. Project sometimes starts with accessibility well incorporated and at the end the
building is not accessible due to wrong product choices and wrong fixings etc.
G.2.2 Belgium (Flanders)
Rapporteur/Informant: Enter vzw – Kathleen Polders [Kathleen.polders@entervzw.be]
History:
Since 17/07/1975 Belgium has a federal law on accessibility. However, this law wasn’t applied a
lot in practice because of several reasons. First of all, the law wasn’t mentioned in our planning
regulations so there was no control on the appliance of the law. Second, the law contained
- 232 -
standards which were obsolete and there was no opening in the law to use new developments or
materials.
Besides certain legal specifications there is in the Flemish regulation of 28/05/2004 a special
attention in the composition of the request of certain building permits for integral
accessibility.
One of the 5 provinces of Flanders had since 2007 an own provincial regulation on
accessibility(excel-sheet: Provinciale stedenbouwkundige verordening inzake
toegankelijkheid). The provincial urban ordinance is in practice since 1/04/2007.
Since 01/03/2010 a new Flemish regulation is in practice (excel-sheet: Gewestelijke
stedenbouwkundige verordening inzake toegankelijkheid).The provincial regulation isn’t in force
anymore since the introduction of the Flemish urban ordinance for accessibility.
 Since 29/04/1997 Flanders has a regulation on roads for roads for pedestrian traffic
 Since 10/05/2007 there is a Belgian anti-discrimination law which include an article on adapting
the workplace for employees. The employer can request an adaptation of the workplace or tools
for one of its employees. The employer receives a compensation for the adaptation.
Since 20/03/2009 there is a Flemish regulation which allows guide dogs to enter public places
 Since 3/04/2001 there is a ministerial circular letter on reserved parking for people with
disabilities
Authorities Flanders
Flemish minister on Equal Opportunities responsible for the legislation on accessibility.
The ministry of Equal Opportunities uses the Open Co-ordination Method to determine
agreements concerning accessibility with the other Flemish policymakers (ministers).
Flemish minister who is responsible for the Flemish Codex Spatial Planning (excel-sheet: Vlaamse
Codex Ruimtelijke Ordening), the legislation of spatial planning and building regulations.
The regulation on accessibility for public buildings for the region of Flanders 01/03/2010 is
mentioned in the building regulations. When building or rebuilding or refurbishing a building
accessible for the public, they have to apply the regulation on accessibility to get a building permit.
Regulation:
The regulation on accessibility for public buildings for the region of Flanders 01/03/2010 must also be
applied for the refurbishment of buildings accessible to the public. If the building is within the scope
of this regulation and there are refurbishments, then the elements rebuild or replaced have to be
adapted to the standards of this regulation.
When it concerns heritage, a heritage-officer makes the weighing between the value of the heritage
and accessibility.
Other:
If it concerns a touristic building, they can get financial support for making their touristic
accommodation more accessible.
In Flanders we have 4 accessibility consultancies (1 in each province, 1 consultancy is working in
2 provinces). A specialist on accessibility gives a specific accessibility advice of new buildings, the
refurbishment of buildings and the adapting of housing. The 4 accessibility consultancies also
check existing buildings on accessibility. The results (How accessible is this building?) are
collected in a databank and can be consulted a on a website www.toevla.be
Enter has initiatives to inform and give tips on accessible buildings, houses ...
- 233 -

“NBN ISO/TR9527:1994 – Ontwerprichtlijnen”. This is an International standard registered as Belgium
standard. We find this standard dated.
“EN 81-70 European safetyrules for elevators including accessibility of elevators for people with
disabilities”. The regulation on accessibility for public buildings for the region of Flanders 01/03/2010
refers to elements (type 2) of this European norm.
Enter vzw: Enter is the Flemish expert centre for accessibility, and its mission is to inspire, to inform,
to promote, do research, work together with users, professionals and policymakers to become more
design for all and get an integrated approach on accessibility of housing, public buildings, public
spaces, urban planning, mobility, tourism and care.
Enter vzw is recognized as the official partner of the Flemish government.
Some instruments that Enter has developed:
- “Handboek toegankelijk publieke gebouwen”: Guidelines for accessible public buildings. This
digital handbook is developed as an initiative next to the Flemish regulation on accessibility. It
gives, next to the regulations, more tips on making a building more accessible. The guidelines can
be consulted on the website www.toegankelijkgebouw.be.
The website also contains digital questionnaires (quickscan + checklist) With the quickscan
designers can find out, in the design phase, what the specific regulations on accessibility are going
to be for their project. The checklist gives, when the design is finished, an overview of the
regulations on accessibility for their specific project. Architects can use this document to send it
with the plans to get a building license.
- “wenkenbladen”: Guidelines for accessibility for several building types, public domain
(accessibility of schools, banks, restaurants and shops, apartments, signalization, sport centres ,
,…) These publications can be ordered or can be consulted on the website of Enter
www.entervzw.be
- “meegroeiwonen”: Enter has made a national design guide on lifespan housing. Enter has
published a guide book on “ lifelong living: flexible – adaptable – growing with your needs” and
also a website www.meegroeiwonen.info. A sustainable, long term vision on living and building
which responds to the diversity of humans, the demographic evolutions and changing needs and
situations of individuals. Currently Enter also has a pilot project with the theme “life long living” at
district level (Genk).
- “de zilveren sleutel”: The silver key www.dezilverensleutel.be is an interactive website for living
for the elderly. It stimulates active elderly to think and act in time on their own living situation,
tips for more comfort, safety in their home; home adaptation, information point, way finder to
financial support, services,...
- “vademecum publiek domein”: Guidelines on accessibility of public domain. These guidelines can
be consulted on the website of Enter www.entervzw.be
Enter vzwhas also a common project“Flemish Network on accessible building” withWTCB (The
Belgian Building Research Institute) and In-Ham. WTCB is a private research institute founded in
1960 under impulse of the National Federation of Belgian Building Contractors.
(www.toegankelijk.be).
Enter has a coordinating function, ongoing consultations en corporation with the 4 accessibility
consultancies (1 in each province, 1 consultancy is working in 2 provinces) in Flanders (see 2. Building
regulations)
- 234 -
Intro: Intro strives to improve the accessibility of festivals, performances in cultural centres and
sporting events for disabled people. To this end, Intro provides organisations with individual advice
and assists with the practical organisation of an event.
TOV(Toegankelijkheidsoverleg Vlaanderen) is the organization that represents the “users” of
accessibility. TOV is an overall organization that covers different member organizations
Ouderenraad: Council of the Elderly People
Bodies that are checking conformity with legislation (public and others):
- Officials who control the application of a building license also control or the regulations on
accessibility are applied
- These officials can ask advice on accessibility from one of the 4 accessibility consultancies.
- If the building is built and the regulations are not applied correctly there is a building violation.
In the social housing sector the Flemish company of social housing (Vlaamse Maatschappij Sociaal
Wonen) applies in itsprocurement guidelines (C2008) elements of accessibility. C2008 is a work
instrument for designing social housing. The social housing companies and their contractors need to
follow these guidelines.
(http://www.vmsw.be/Algemeen/Publicaties/C2008/tabid/5604/language/nl-BE/Default.aspx)
Other public buildings have to apply the regulation on accessibility to get a building license
(Stedenbouwkundige verordening inzake toegankelijkheid publiek toegankelijke gebouwen).
New building projects with work places, offices, shops etc. in general are now accessible in the
country.According to the scope of the regulation on accessibility for public buildings for the region of
Flanders 01/03/2010.
There is a difference in meaning of “public” in this Flemish legislation.
In Flanders, the building type determines the “publicness” of a building. Every building that is
accessible for people who are not employees, whoever the owner or tenantis is a public building. We
make this distinction because in case of employees we have the regulation on adapting the
workplace.
So libraries, shops, offices (not the spaces only for employees but only the rooms public like
entrance, lobby, meeting rooms,…), schools, sport accommodation, the communal space of
apartment buildings (not the private apartments), touristic accommodation, hospitals (except the
private rooms of the patients),… are all public buildings in Flanders and the regulation on accessibility
for public buildings for the region of Flanders 01/03/2010 has to be verified.
This regulation has to be applied when you build, rebuild or refurnish a building in Flanders. The
regulation determines 3 groups of buildings: touristic accommodations, “residential buildings” (=
buildings with rooms for sleeping = apartment buildings, hospitals, elderly homes, student dorms and
prisons), other public buildings (schools, shops, offices,…).
For the group of touristic accommodations the number of rooms determines the scope of this
regulation. For example if the building only has 2 rooms used as a touristic accommodation, the
regulation is not to be applied. If you have 3-10 accommodation, the ground floor (the common
parts) has to be accessible and has to be adapted to the standards described in this regulation
(circulation routes, stairs, ramps, lifts, sanitary facilities, dressing rooms, changing rooms, parking,
seating (theatre seating) and reception desk). If there are types of rooms on other floors that are not
accessible on the ground floor, they also have to be adapted to the standards.
For more than 10 rooms the standards are to be applied for the whole building (common parts) + the
regulation asks to provide a percentage of the rooms as accessible.
- 235 -
For the group of “residential buildings” the number of rooms + the number of levels they are situated
determines the scope. For example, in apartment buildings there have to be a minimum of 6
apartments situated on 3 levels. If this is the case the standards are to be applied for the whole
building (common parts; not the “private parts” like the apartment itself).
For the other group the scope gets determined by the m² which are public. For example an office.
Only the parts accessible for public have to be taking in account for the m². The parts only for
employees not.
When building or rebuilding (refurbishment) a building accessible for the public, they have to apply
this regulation to get a building license.
Officials who control the application of a building license also control whether the regulations on
accessibility are applied. These officials also can ask advice on accessibility from one of the 4
accessibility consultancies.
The regulation on accessibility for public buildings for the region of Flanders is active since
01/03/2010. Already since January 2010 Enter vzw organized together with Equal Opportunities in
Flanders 7 information sessions for architects.
The 4 accessibility consultancies held, each around 5 in there province, information sessions for
officials who control the application of a building license.
Enter vzw has also a Efro-Project “Flemish Network on accessible building” together with WTCB (The
Belgian Building Research Institute – www.bbri.be) and In-HAM (www.in-ham.be)
This network organizes in September and October 2010 information sessions for contractors.
Policy Note 2009-2014 of the minister of Equal Opportunities.
Open Co-ordination Method for implementing accessibilities in the policy of the other ministers
with specific action plans and goals
There are different new projects of Enter and of Equal Opportunities
The Flemish adjustment support is a financial support when you want to adjust your house to the
physical needs of a person older than 65. The financial support is for technical tools or
refurbishments to improve accessibility.
You also have subsidies for buildings (for example hospitals, elderly homes,… www.vipa.be) where
accessibility is a criteria for getting the funds.
Some cities or communities give financial support for accessibility screenings and for adjustments for
improving accessibility (users of wheelchairs, baby carriage, elderly, … of a shop, a doctor’s office, a
meeting place, sport facilities…)
If it concerns a touristic building, they can get financial support for making their touristic
accommodation more accessible. There are also labels in the touristic sector for accessible
accommodations.
Flanders now has a regulation that has to be taken in consideration when building a building
accessible for public. This is a step forward to accessible buildings.
Enter vzw has by the years obtained a lot of expertise on accessibility. With the websites, information
sessions,… Enter tries to convince and inform people of the importance of accessibility. This Flemish
- 236 -
regulation on accessibility doesn’t cover everything, so guidelines are very important. Sensibilisation
and guidelines often work better to understand regulation.
Activities to improve the existing building stock according accessibility:
Regulation, sensibilisation and guidelines
G.2.3 Bulgaria
No rapporteur available.
G.2.4 Cyprus
Rapporteur/Informant: Clelia Petridou [clelia@cytanet.com.cy]
The Legislation concerning the accessibility of the Disabled was firstly voted on 1991 but the basic
specification/requirements were only put in action at 1999 as 61H requirements and are part of the
Legislation for Roads and Buildings. Thus no building license was issued since unless all floors were
accessible to wheelchair users. The requirements concerned either residential or/and non residential
buildings with parking spaces over 5 (included). This Regulation is still in force but a new Legislation
under the 89/106/EU for the “Safety in use and accessibility” is under preparation and hopefully will
be in force by the end of 2010.
The Authority responsible for issuing the building license is
- the Department of Urbanism of Housing and Planning for stage 1 concerning the
development plan and
- The local Authorities for stage 2 concerning the issue of Building permit. The Local Authority
we could say that is the competent authority for plan checking and auditing.
The Local Authority is supposed to check the plans regarding accessibility, but the follow up was
actually very difficult at least the first 5-6 years for there was no exact Knowledge in accessibility
matters. Now, 10 years passed since the first implementation of the Legislation and we can say that
there is enough sensitization and knowledge both among designers and the Authorities. The Local
Authority is trying to have a follow up on the construction stage but, the fact that the Department of
Housing and Planning issues the stage I Permit the construction starts (illegally) without the actual
building Permit and sometimes there are problems emerging concerning for example the slope
gradient or the width of corridors etc.
Concerning the existing buildings under refurbishment or adaptation, there must be a feasible
implementation of accessibility requirements. In case accessibility is difficult to achieve, a Special
Committee is actually responsible for deciding the degree of implementation.
Officially there are no standards for construction following the CEN/CLC Guide 6. The existing 61H
standards are general with the minimum of the main specifications. A new legislation is being
prepared though by the Cyprus Scientific and Technical Chamber (ETEK) that includes all the
standards referred in the Guide 6. These requirements will be hopefully implemented by the end of
2010.
As for Checking theconformity to the accessibility legislation is a task of the Local Authority. The
Accessibility Bureau of the Ministry of Transport and Works is the only Service that is giving advices
on accessibility matters. A guide was prepared and sent to all architects so as they can follow the
requirements easily. The bureau is in contact with all Government Departments responsible for the
design of Official buildings, pavements or pedestrian areas.
- 237 -
The Bureau is in contact with the Technical Committee for People with Reduced Mobility ({TEDEA) –
an NGO Committee constituted by private architects who are trying to promote accessible design.
Concerning the new guidelines mentioned above, the Cyprus Committee of Organisations of PwD
were involved as well as the Bureau for the Accessibility of the Ministry of Transport and Works, and
the Technical Committee for People with Reduced Mobility ({TEDEA) – NGO.
The Paraplegic Association is also actively involved and is becoming more and more assuming and
asserting which is very helpful. For example together with the accessibility bureau they claimed from
Cyprus Tourist Organisation, to promote accessibility for hotels and restaurants and there were
special seminaries for the relevant officers. This co-operation started 6 months ago and its goal is to
spread the notion of accessibility in to this Organisation and consequently the tourism Industry.
Law 12(I)/2006 (the Law) is the relevant legislation governing public procurement contracts in the
Republic of Cyprus. The Law, which transposes EU Procurement Directives 17/2004 and 18/2004 into
Cyprus's legal system, provides for the co-ordination of procedures for the award of public works
contracts, public supply contracts, public service contracts and related matters. All projects are
obliged to comply with the accessibility requirements of the 61.H specifications.
The department responsible for public procurements edited measures to develop the implementing
capacity of the Cypriot authorities in applying the European Public Procurement legislative Package.
On the other hand, all European co financed projects for roads, pedestrian areas or the Cyprus
Cultural Centre are obliged to get an Accessibility Certificate from the Committee for Accessibility of
the Ministry of Transport and Works, a Committee coordinated by the Accessibility Bureau. The plan-
checking is done accordingly to the functional requirements of CEN/CENELEC Guide 6.
All new building projects since 2000 are accessible in a basic level but not yet the shops because the
requirements wasn’t clear about that (it was enough for them to have the main entrance of the
building accessible and did not specify exactly about the shops) So we can’t really say that Cyprus is
not exactly an accessible country but we are hopefully about to become one. The notion of universal
design, the level of sensitization and the rights of the PwDs are becoming more and more pressing
for the centres of decision makers.
All pavements though in the city centres are being adapted so as to be safe and accessible for
wheelchair users and the blind with tactile guides.
In the stage of the application for building permit and all the plans have to comply with the
requirements of 61H. For big projects there is a rather close audit but not necessarily/specifically for
accessibility matters because there is still a serious lack of knowledge and sensitization.
Bodies involved are the Technical Services of each Local Authority.
Non for the moment apart from initializing seminaries in 1999 and an accessibility seminary
organized by TEDEA (NGO association). The only Government Service in this field is the Bureau for
the accessibility in the Ministry of Transport and Works that gives information and knowledge about
accessibility specifications. The Accessibility Bureau is among other things, giving short seminaries to
the public officers. Things will really move on when the new legislation takes place end of 2010.
There have not been any “accessibility action plans” in the past, apart from the fact that government
is obliged to employ 10% of PwD in public posts but the buildings are not actually ready to accept the
new employees.
- 238 -
There are new actions / policies to implement accessibility in the near future at national or regional
level.A whole new legislation is being carried out and will be soon voted by the House of the
Representatives. This new Legislation concerns all matters of “Design for all” and there will be special
“educational” seminars to Architects and engineers.
There are no public funds available for new (and existing) multi-level housing, single apartment
and/or family single homes to improve accessibility etc., only in the case of a disable’s house for
adapting the living space.
The Department of Public Works has a program of adapting the existing Public Service Buildings in
the context of renovation.
There are no awards available which are considering accessibility in the built environment as a single
subject or as a strategy for sustainability?
Good practices in the country
The new design concerning pedestrian pavements has adopted a holistic approach for Cypriot
pavements so as to have the right specifications for wheelchair users and for the blind.
G.2.5 Czech Republic
Rapporteur/Informant:
Libor Dupal, Czech Consumer Association [Dupal@regio.cz]
With the help of:
Přemysl Berounský, Cabinet for Standardization
Petr Novák, Ministry of Local Development
Ondřej Folk [o.folk@nrzp.cz](access expert: Dagmar Lanzova, CNDC expert consultant for
accessibility)
Act on building No. 183/2006 Coll. including amendments contains also provisions regarding
accessibility in buildings.
Code No. 398/2009 Coll. on ensuring accessibility in buildings. The obligation for accessibility is
embedded in the building code.
The building code provides for the basic requirements for building as far as the accessibility is
concerned. Details are specified in implementing ordinances (Ordinance No. 398/2009 Coll. on civil-
technical requirements for foundation engineering and use of barrier-free buildings).
The building code is valid for new buildings as well as for changes of finalized buildings and for
changes in use of buildings.
For the finalizing of buildings there exist ordinance No. 499/2006 on finalizing of buildings where
some details are also specified.
Guide 6 - Guidelines for standards developers to address the needs of older persons and persons
with disabilities was translated (in fact as ISO/IEC Guide 71) was 5 years ago translated by our
association and published in a brochure together with the ISO/IEC Guides 50 and 51. We together
with the national standardization body (CNI at that time) broadly distributed the booklet among the
- 239 -
members of standardization committees, standardization centres and other standard developers. In

this way the implementation of the guide has been supported.
Probably there is no national standard on accessibility in the built environment available. All relevant
EN are implemented. Some of ENs implemented as CSN are referred directly from the Code or from
the implementing ordinances, respectively.
Ministry of Local Development,
Ministry of Transport (accessibility in means of transport),
Ministry of Industry and Trade (particular products for disabled people),
Governmental Committee for Disabled People.
Some NGOs and professional associations are also involved to some degree.
The architect or designer is fully responsible for ensuring barrier-free access in buildings during
design process as well as during execution of the building.
All persons participating at the design and execution of the building are responsible for safe and
barrier-free execution of the building in accordance with the documentation of the building. This is
checked during building permit process at the local building authority.
The accessibility of the building is checked during final building approval and then by inspections
carried out during use of the building.
Yes; the Law No 137/2006 on public procurement
The National Association often complaints on some particular problems related to accessibility of
new buildings.
Act No 22/1997 on technical requirements for products;
Order of the Government No.163/2002 on the scheme of assessment of construction products
The legislation concerning the SAC is fully compatible with the European harmonizing legislation.
Ministry of Local Development intensively ensures courses for municipal building offices;
Česká komora akreditovaných inženýrů a techniků činných ve stavebnictví / the Czech Board of
Accredited Engineers and Technicians in Construction Building – this professional association
prepares training and professional education for their members.
Governmental Decree No. 253/2010 – national plan for creation of equal opportunities for years
2010-2014
Targeted grants in the frame of the national programme of Accessibility For All.
A lot of done, a lot of missing.
Problem is that some EU harmonised rules (including standards) are of lower quality than previous
schemes and rules.
- 240 -
In the Czech Republic the issue of accessibility (barrier-free use of buildings) is established in specific
way, which seems to be different from these in other EU member states.
Accessibility is mostly covered by the Construction Code, not by the Antidiscrimination Act. Provisions
of the Construction Code establish barrier-free use of buildings/constructions as public interest.
Accessibility shall be included even in the stage of planning of all new buildings/constructions
(planning management). In existing buildings (change of building = renovation; change of usage - e.g.
from nursery to retirement home) the Decree provisions are applied unless there are serious area-
technical or construction-technical reasons against (e.g. the elevator 1 x 1,4m cannot be built in the
casing of 0,9 x 1m). Alike buildings/constructions being cultural heritage, the Decree is applied along
the interests of cultural preservation.
Established parameters are related to the group of persons called in legislation as persons with
reduced mobility (PRM). These include persons with physical disability (wheelchair users, persons with
clutches, sticks, walkers, or walking slowly), persons with sensory disabilities (visual, hearing,
learning), seniors, pregnant women, mother with prams or children under 3 years and persons with
heavy or huge luggage). The Decree is divided in technical details in each chapter according to the
needs of persons with physical, visual and hearing disabilities).
The Decree is followed by technical standards providing technical details.
There are no special standards of accessibility, these are included in each new or revised regulation,
covering the needs of persons with physical, visual and hearing disability."
G.2.6 Denmark
Rapporteur/Informant: Soren Ginnerup [sog@sbi.dk]
Accessibility requirements were first introduced through functional requirements in the Building Act
and technically in Building Regulations of 1977. Regulations have been expanded gradually by each
revision in 1984, 1995, 2008 and the present 2010 version. The Ministry of Economics and Business
are responsible for core legislation and building regulations through its Danish Enterprise and
Construction Authority. Guidelineson road and urban accessibility are controlled mainly by the
Ministry of Transport, also responsible for implementing EU directives and access issues related to
bus, rail and air passenger transport.
Accessibility requirements in the Building Regulations are partially checked by Municipal Authority
Building Controllers, according to schemes set up locally. Major variations in level and detail are seen
from Municipality to Municipality for this reason, including follow-up procedures. It’s important to
notice that building controllers are not liable for accessibility requirements not being met in a
building, as this by law resides solely with the owner or builder. Consequently, the completion stage
is not associated with a full sign-off by the authorities, and flaws in buildings theoretically remain
reportable even years after completion. Upon reception of complaints the authorities are then
obliged to demand that the building owner takes steps to correct the issue.
When refurbishing and adapting existing buildings with public access, newbuilding control
procedures of close to regulatory status have been in force since 2005, leading to a gradual
improvement of accessibility in existing buildings.
Danish Standards have published DS 3028 (2001), Accessibility for All, covering buildings for private
and public use, largely implementingthe functional requirements of Guide 6.
As of 2006 the Danish Building Research Institute has taken over production of accessibility design
guidelines, closely linked to the Building Regulations. The guidelines have more or less replaced the
- 241 -
DS 3028 standard, and standardization development focus has very much turned towardsupcoming
ISO and CEN standards that may become part of future EU regulations.
Co-operation structures between relevant public & private bodies and NGOs are of formal as well as
informal nature, and only few major initiatives are not coordinated to some point.
Besides from a few organizations that may be employing their own assessment schemes, all
checking of conformity is assigned to local municipal authorities, and, in particular, the builder
and/or owner.
There is no formal regulatory procedure for procurement concerning accessibility of the built
environment, mainly as all buildings are subject to the requirements in the Building regulations.
Publicly procured projects with work places, offices, shops etc. inherently should be accessible.
Actual level of accessibility of courseis subject tostandards of procurers, knowledge of consultants
and influence of building control procedures.
Conformity schemes are designed by the municipal authority building control departments
themselves, and harmonised National schemes do not exist. The stage of the building process at
which formal and informal assessment starts for this reason varies greatly, but often happens at the
stage of application for a building permit or possibleintroductory talks. Municipal Authority Building
Control departments are the principal bodies involved in conformity assessment.
Short introductory courses on accessibility are being offered by the Danish Building Research
Institute, Aalborg University, directed towards built environment related educations. Some courses
are part of the curricula in a few schools of architecture, but do not carry a compulsory status.
Consultancy organizations report that formal expertise and capacity in general is lacking throughout
the industry, and ask that access consultant training modules be set up as soon as possible. A basic
level module for architects, engineers and consultants is being introduced in 2011 at the Danish
Building Research Institute, University of Aalborg, and a master in Universal design is planned to
follow in 2013.
Regarding the UN convention accessibility obligations to be largely met by the current building
regulations, possible further action plans are more likely to be generated by EU directives than by
National initiatives. Large scale action plans are not planned at the moment.
Allowing accessibility requirements in the latest versions of the building regulations to maintain their
technical specification nature demonstrates that accessibility is being treateddifferently from other
matters, the majority of which haveundergone a gradualtransformationinto functional requirements
instead.
Ensuring capacity building and tools for better compliance with existing regulations are selected
areas of action in the next couple of years, mainly as part of funds allocated to University of Aalborg
projects.
Activities for existing buildings to improve accessibility: Government funds for improvements in
access to buildings with public service functions have been active since 2006, and approximately 100
projects per year are compensated up to 25 % of accessibility related costs.
Building regulations ensure that the majority of new public and private housing, including single
family homes, be accessible or at least visitable to a certain point, ensuring a growing mass of
relatively easily adaptable homes of all categories.
- 242 -
Special funds are in placeto finance an annual refurbishmentof considerable numbers of existing
multilevel housing areas, focusing to a very high degree on improved accessibility.
Formerly a prize existed for buildings with cultural purposes, but currently no awards are available.
Weak points and gaps in the general situation
Compared to other countries it seems characteristic that the absence of a Discrimination Act
influences the awareness and preparedness of procurers to comply with more than the basic
measures for accessible buildings, prescribed through regulations. On the other hand, basic universal
design in an informal sense is already part of the building regulations, particularly on step-free access
which applies to each and every entrance in all types of buildings, including private homes, a case not
being seen anywhere else in the world. The weak side may be, though, that fulfilment of
requirements ismore difficult to accomplishin practice, and that control gradually has been reduced
over the past 25 years, possibly offering too little assistance in the critical stages of the building
process. With responsibility being stressed as an issue concerning the owner of a building, and to a
lesser degree the municipal authorities, a clear gap is present her.
Consequently, the most important points for improvement in my view would be improvedquality
assessment proceduressupporting self-declaration of existing rules; a discrimination act influencing
the accessibility of existing environments, and, finally, mainstreaming of universal design strategies in
planning and design, through better education and training.
G.2.7 Estonia
G.2.8 Finland
Rapporteur/Informant: Maija Könkkölä [maija.konkkola@invalidiliitto.fi]
In 1973, a clause was added to the Finnish Building Decree that stipulated, for the first time, that
planning should also give adequate consideration to the needs of people with impaired mobility or
orientation skills. In 1978, a group of associations of disabled people lodged an official complaint
with the Chancellor of Justice, concerning the absence of any lift in the town hall of Kauniainen (a
small town near Helsinki); this complaint resulted in an acknowledgement of the need for a lift in
public buildings even if they only have two storeys, and provisions and guidelines to this effect were
incorporated in the relevant legislation.
Gradually, the effect of the decree began to be seen in new buildings. Disabled people still had to
lodge complaints many times, especially when attempts were made to avoid the lift requirement
when buildings were built on a slope and access was possible from ground-level to both storeys.
To stop this, in 1985 the Ministry of the Environment, which is responsible for matters concerning
building, issued new and stricter provisions and guidelines, although the decree itself remained
unchanged.
In 1990 the time was at last ripe for a reform of the Buildings Decree, so that instead of referring to
"adequate consideration" it now spoke of premises to which everyone had an equal right of access.
At the same time, a new clause was introduced into the decree. This stipulated that all buildings, i.e.
including residential buildings too, should be appropriate to the needs of children, old people and
people with a disability. However, this clause was interpreted to mean that only apartment blocks of
four storeys or higher must have a lift; on the other hand, in buildings that do have lifts, it was taken
to mean that bathrooms and lavatories must be large enough for users with wheelchairs.
In 1995 there was a change in the Finnish Constitution which forbids all discrimination on grounds of
disability or illness. This for its part influenced positively the development of Finnish building
- 243 -
legislation.
The highest authority in planning and building is Ministry of the Environment. In municipalities, the
building permissions are given by municipal Building Control Committees.
A new "Land Use and Building Law" came into force in the beginning of the year 2000.There are
many places in this law where the demand of accessibility is mentioned. Public and private spaces for
administration, services, business, working spaces, blocks of flats and pedestrian spaces must be and
be kept accessible.
New Building Regulations and Guidelines F2 concerning safety came into force in 2001 and Building
Regulations and Guidelines F1 and G1 in 2005. In them the accessibility regulations have become
better than before. It is no more possible to build blocks of flats with three storeys or more without a
lift. Also the entrances of small houses must now be made accessible.
In Ministry of the Environment is now starting an operation to make the building regulations and
guidelines more clear so that they are easier to follow.
A big problem is, that in different municipalities the law and regulations are followed differently. The
Building Control Committees are generally stricter in large cities than in rural municipalities. A
problem has also been the habit of neglecting the accessible entrance to small houses. Perhaps the
reason is, that there are no sanctions for neglecting accessibility. Town-planners are not enough
aware of what are the access principles in planning and building.
When an existing building is renovated so that it needs a building permission, it must be made
accessible principally according to the regulations and guidelines for mew buildings.
To my knowledge, Guide 6. is not used in standardization. ISO/TR 22411:2008 concerning vulnerable
groups has been translated into Finnish.
In Finland "Rakennustietosäätiö"(The Building Information Foundation) publishes "RT-cards"
(Building Information Cards) concerning building guidelines and building products. There are cards
with information about accessibility and in some cards the information about accessibility is
integrator with other information. There is also an illustrated publication called "Esteetön rakennus
ja ympäristö 2007" (Accessible Building and environment).
Some publications have been produced in Finnish Association of People with Physical Disabilities
ordered by Ministry of the Environment. The Ministry of Education and Culture has produced
publications concerning sports facilities. Many associations of people with a disability have produced
several publications about accessibility.
In some municipalities there is an accessibility ombudsman. Most municipalities have a municipal
disability council with expertise in accessibility. Some associations of people with disabilities also
have people who can give guidance in accessibility matters.
There is no legislation yet concerning accessibility in public procurement.
---
The students learn at technical universities and colleges what is necessary concerning accessibility
according to the law and regulations. Architects who have studied earlier have little or no education
about accessibility. A big problem are negative attitudes towards accessibility among older
- 244 -
generations of architects and engineers. Unfortunately these attitudes often are inherited by
younger colleagues too. Accessibility is not regarded as a human right and an essential part of
sustainable building.
Finland has not ratified the Convention. The action plan VAMPO (Finland's Disability Policy
Programme) has been approved 2010. There has not been accessibility action plans for Finland in the
past. Helsinki has a ten-year accessibility project "Helsinki for All" ending 2011.
ARA (The Housing Finance and Development Centre of Finland) supports new lifts in old multi-storey
dwelling houses. Municipalities support modifications in the homes of severely disabled people.
There is a yearly award Accessibility Prize by Architects' and designers' Armi Association and the
Finnish Association of People with Physical Disabilities.
Architects, builders in general and politicians are now active in ecological and economical issues but
seem to neglect social issues such as accessibility in the built environment. We need more
awareness, change of attitudes and education in accessibility matters.
When guidelines concerning sustainable built environment are presented, they must be integrated
with guidelines for accessibility.
Accessibility must be regarded as a human right of people with disabilities. In new buildings,
accessibility is a wise investment to the future. It benefits all people. This must be understood.
Economical resources must be used to promote accessibility in existing buildings, too.
G.2.9 France
Rapporteur/Informant: Eric Gaussorgues [eric.gaussogues@afnor.org]
A new law in 2005 makes an obligation to build any new building (habitation, for public or for
workers) with accessibility requirements and all existing buildings receiving public and systems of
transportation must before 2015 make works to allow the accessibility.
Law of 2005, February the 11: art 41 to 47
Decree 1657, May the 17th
Order, August the 1st
No accessibility standards available.
All kind of associations of disable people,
If there is no respect of accessibility regulations, no subsidies are allowed in public works sites.
Departmental commissions of accessibility in any new project, including states agents, associations
- 245 -
Regulated by the law, there is an obligation to organize the learning of accessibility in schools of
architecture.
Not in my point of view but the convention has been recently signed by the state of France.
Specially private or NGO’s initiatives.
The new law is recent but very complete and ambitious.
G.2.10 Germany
Rapporteur/Informant: Dr. Volker Sieger [sieger@institut-bgm.de]
In 2002, the German Federal Disabled Persons Equality Act (BGG) came into force, followed by the
corresponding regional laws in the respective federal states (Laender) in subsequent years. The laws,
whether at national or regional level, define neither functional nor technical requirements for
accessibility. However, they do specify that accessibility must be ensured when structures are built.
These laws refer to all new buildings and extensive conversions of existing ones. The principles of the
inviolability of property and proportionality apply to improving accessibility in existing buildings.
The Disabled Persons Equality Acts, whether on a federal or regional level, have also had a direct
impact on more specific legislation (e.g. laws concerning the conveyance of passengers). Other
specific legislation (e.g. construction legislation) has also been amended to take accessibility
requirements into account. Specific legislation stipulates in general terms that accessibility must be
ensured but only specify functional requirements in exceptional cases. However, all such legislation
stipulates that accessibility must be ensured either by applying the generally recognized rules of
technology or specific technical rules (e.g. DIN 18024).
A list of all mandatory or recommended technical rules for the various legal fields, whether at federal
or Laender level, does not yet exist but is due to be published in late 2012 (by the Institute for
Accessibility and Mobility, Mainz, and the German Association for the BIind and Partially Sighted,
Berlin).
Building regulations – different Responsibilities
The construction ministries in each of the 16 Laender and the construction authorities that operate
under the control of the construction ministries are responsible for building, i.e. buildings to which
the public has access and other structures, as well as housing.
The ministries of transport in each of the 16 Laender are responsible for civil engineering works, i.e.
public roads and highways, and for public transport. This field is not dealt with here as the legal
situation in this field is far more complex that in the building sector and specific rules apply to the
construction of tunnels or structures built by the national railway company, for example.
Building Regulations and Implementation in practice
Apart from certain exceptions, the Laender are responsible for building legislation. The regional
building codes generally stipulate that accessibility has to be ensured in new buildings. Lists of
technical building regulations drawn up by the respective construction ministry exist to aid the
implementation of construction legislation in practice and compliance with the regulations included
in the list is mandatory for clients and architects. The relevant declarations in writing have to be
submitted.
- 246 -
Fourteen of the 16 Laender have included the currently valid DIN standards on accessibility (DIN
18024 and DIN 18025) in their lists of technical building regulations, either fully or partially. In one
federal state they are regarded as generally recognized rules of technology and are applied as such.
Only in a single federal state are they regarded as one of a number of possibilities of ensuring
accessibility.
It can be more or less assumed that all 16 Laender will include the new DIN standards on accessibility
(DIN 18040-1 for buildings to which the public has access to be published in October 2010 and DIN
18040-2 for housing, to be published in 2011) in their lists of technical construction regulations. The
same mandatory technical rules on accessibility would then apply throughout Germany.
It is not usually checked whether the list of technical construction regulations has been fully taken
into account. However, the respective building authorities have the right to carry out checks at any
time. This also applies to accessibility. In practice, compliance with the regulations is only checked
when third parties (e.g. the official local representative for disabled persons or a representative of an
association for the disabled) identifies infringements of the regulations in plans or in completed
buildings. As clients and architects alike are obliged to comply with the list of technical building
regulations, the necessary legal action can be taken at any time, in the same way as for all other
infringements of valid building regulations.
Accessibility within existing buildings with lower or equal requirements?
The building codes of the Laender do not draw any distinction between new buildings and
modernisation. The building codes and technical building regulations apply to all construction work.
However, in view of the protection of property, consideration is always given to limiting the financial
cost of ensuring accessibility in existing buildings to a reasonable level. Improving accessibility in
existing buildings is therefore the exception rather than the rule.
The technical rules do not include lower requirements for improving accessibility in existing
buildings. The relevant technical rules for new buildings, e.g. the DIN standards referred to above,
always apply to modernisation work in existing buildings and for limited building conversions.
Recommendations are given in numerous handbooks and guidelines.
According to a decision of the relevant DIN committee, it is not currently planned to publish a
separate technical body of rules for improving accessibility in existing buildings. German associations
for the disabled in particular oppose separate technical rules only for existing buildings. They support
the view that the relevant standards for new buildings should also apply by analogy to existing ones,
in line with current practice.
There are a number of DIN standards on accessibility issues (see data collection Germany).
CEN/CENELEC Guide 6 is probably seldom applied, due to lack of familiarity with it.
Disabled persons and representatives of associations for the disabled are members of the
committees in charge of preparing standards for accessibility.
As all public tenders in Germany have to comply with the recognized rules of technology and respect
the lists of technical building regulations new buildings with public access have to be accessible.
Similar rules apply to housing for which public tendering procedures are carried out. This is usually
only the case for rented housing run by housing associations.
Generally the municipal building authorities are responsible for ensuring compliance with legal and
technical regulations (see above). However, they only check compliance in individual cases or if any
infringements are reported (see above).
- 247 -
Generally accessible buildings – compared with UN Convention list

Work places are not subject to the building legislation described above. They are generally made
accessible if disabled persons are employed. Public grants for employers are available in this case,
the grants being financed by a fund into which employers thatdo not employ any, or too few,
disabled persons pay a compensation charge.
For office buildings that are subsequently used partially as workshops and partially as units to which
the public has access (e.g. doctors' surgeries), the number of units that are not accessible is
estimated to be very high.
All other buildings and structures such as hotels, restaurants, shops, post offices, doctors' surgeries,
chemists etc. are listed in the building regulations as buildings to which the public has access and
therefore fall under the provisions of building legislation, so that application of DIN 18024-2 (soon to
be replaced by DIN 18040-1) is mandatory.
In spite of the presumably considerable number of buildings that are accessible to the public but
that, in contravention of the building regulations, do not (adequately) comply with requirements for
accessibility, it can generally be said that all new buildings are accessible. However, as the
construction of new buildings and extensive conversions are only part of the construction activities
taking place in Germany there is no reliable data on the percentage of accessible buildings available.
There is no reliable data for housing either. However, it must be assumed in this case that only a very
small percentage of housing units are accessible. This is mainly due to the fact that around 80 per
cent of construction work is on existing buildings (modernisation of housing built in the 1950s and
1960s). As already mentioned above, it is very difficult to ensure accessibility in existing buildings,
especially in housing, owing to the principle of proportionality.
There are no compulsory modules dealing with accessibility in degree courses for architects and
engineers in Germany.
Expertise with regard to accessibility is available in numerous publications on the subject but the
number of experts with specialist knowledge of this field who would be able to assess accessibility
for public or private clients is very small. The architectural associations for Berlin-Brandenburg and
Saxony are just beginning to offer training courses in this subject for architects.
Accessibility seldom appears on curricula and then only as an optional element.
The federal government is currently drawing up a plan of action to implement the UN Convention.
As accessibility has to be implemented first and foremost by the Laender, in particular due to the fact
that the federal states are responsible for building legislation and passenger transport, action plans
at this level will be particularly important. The government of the federal state of Rhineland-
Palatinate has already passed an action plan to implement the UN Convention. Other regional
governments, in North Rhine-Westphalia for example, are in the process of drawing up action plans.
The government-owned bank Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW) awards cheap loans to private
individuals and housing associations for modernisation work in existing housing.
The work carried out must improve accessibility. Compliance with individual modules defined by the
KfW has to be achieved (e.g. improving accessibility by installing a lift or stair lift, accessibility in
bathrooms).
Any activities for existing buildings to improve accessibility?
There are unfortunately only very few such activities. Only the federal state of Rhineland-Palatinate
has introduced a provision in its Disabled Persons Equality Act according to which the Land, local
- 248 -
authorities and other public institutions are meant to gradually improve accessibility in existing
buildings. We are not aware of the existence of similar provisions in any other federal states.
Existing building legislation, in particular the lists of technical building regulations and, generally, the
reference to DIN 18024-2, guarantee that accessibility is ensured in new public buildings and in
existing public buildings after extensive conversion work. Accessibility can therefore be legally
enforced even though the relevant building authorities rarely carry out checks.
When DIN 18040-1 is published, all federal states will probably gradually include the new standard in
their respective building codes so that Germany will soon have a basis for ensuring accessibility in
buildings that is accepted by all of the most important interest groups.
The situation for new housing will be similar when DIN 18040-2 is published in 2011. Irrespective of
this, however, each of the sixteen federal states stipulates in its own building code the minimum
number of accessible housing units that must be provided in each residential building. The situation
is still very unsatisfactory in many federal states (see below).
One weak point is the lack of checks carried out by the building authorities. During deregulation and
the reduction of bureaucracy the number of staff employed by the building authorities was gradually
reduced. Thus the authorities can practically only react if they are notified of infringements of the
building regulations. Due to the lack of staff, compliance with regulations on accessibility is almost
only ever checked in the case of large construction projects.
Another weak point is that there is no legal obligation or other incentive to improve accessibility in
existing buildings that are accessible to the public. For example, hardly any old restaurants have
toilets for disabled guests.
It is also unsatisfactory that in most federal states there are almost no regulations stipulating the
number of accessible rooms that must be provided in new hotels even though hotels are accessible
to the public and therefore have to ensure accessibility.
As far as housing is concerned, it is unsatisfactory that, in spite of the standards on accessibility
(currently DIN 18025, in future DIN 18040-2), the building regulations of the 16 federal states have
separate, and different, rules concerning how many accessible housing units must be provided in
each residential building. In many federal states, the number of accessible housing units stipulated in
the respective building regulations is insufficient and an amendment to the regulations would be
desirable.
Regarding the subject of accessibility as a whole, the amount of old housing stock is probably the
greatest problem in Germany. As most construction activities take place in existing buildings, the
building regulations only apply to a limited extent, as mentioned above. As a result, there will be a
lack of accessible housing in Germany for many decades to come. This not only conflicts with the UN
Convention, it will also make demographic change difficult to manage.
G.2.11 Greece
Rapporteur/Informant: Katerina Papamichal [papamikat@yahoo.gr]
The Greek Constitution guarantees equal rights for all citizens. This includes the rights of people with
disabilities to participate fully in society (article 21).
Functional requirements are stated in various laws to ensure accessibility to publicbuildings, spaces
and facilities for “people with special needs”, “people with reduced mobility”, “people who
encounter obstacles” and “people with disabilities”. Private dwellings have only limited
- 249 -
requirements concerning access to buildings and provision of lifts in apartment blocks over 3 storeys
high.
Since June 1985 an Office for Studies for People with Special Needs was established in the Ministry
of Environment, Planning and Public Works, with the purpose to eliminate barriers and to improve
the awareness of technicians and all the actors responsible for this issue. This office provided
important input to the General Building Regulations and also published the first Greek “Guidelines on
Designing for All” (1998). The Guidelines, including functional requirements and technical
specifications, are referred to in almost all the legislation concerning the built environment, and can
therefore be regarded as de facto standards.
Most of the legislation on accessibility in the last 10 to 15 years has been issued by the Ministry of
Environment but other Ministries such as Tourism, Health, Social Welfare and Transport have
produced legislation which includes accessibility requirements and specifications. All of these refer to
the above Guidelines.
The Athens 2004 Olympic and Paralympic Games gave a considerable impetus to the awareness and
knowledge of accessibility issues and led to a wide range of solutions in the Olympic cities, especially
in Athens.
Since 2005 the Ministry of the Interior has been given responsibility to direct and coordinate the
implementation of accessibility to the built environment in prefectures and municipalities.
There is a ministerial accessibility committee coordinated by the Ministry of the Interior and an
accessibility committee for improving the general building regulations.
The Greek planning system is characterized by a multiplicity of laws and a command-and-control type
regulation. Planning control is realized through the building permit. This permit is required for any
work of construction. There is a lack of efficient monitoring and control mechanisms in the
implementation of accessibility.
The Ministry of Interior has begun in past 5 years to enforce the follow-up of the accessibility
regulations more effectively by means of circulars, action programmes and conformity assessment
schemes in ministries and municipalities. This system is not yet fully used in practice.
The Greek National Tourist Organisation (EOT) has a follow-up procedure since it checks the
accessibility of new and renovated hotel buildings and facilities as part of the star classification
assessment system.
Conformity checking was carried out thoroughly for the Athens 2004 Olympic and Paralympic Games
installations, buildings and outdoor environments.
There is special legislation and action programmes to improve the accessibility of all existing public
buildings. The implementation and follow up is not yet effective. There is no public financial support
or incentives to improve the accessibility of privately-owned buildings (homes or businesses).
There are accessibility standards for construction, built environment or building products published
by the National Standards Organisation, only general standards, e.g. for lifts, following EU directives.
[Standards are not in line with the functional requirements of CEN/CENELEC Guide 6. Standards e.g.
for lifts refer only to construction, operation and maintenance ]
Production of accessibility design guidelines
Accessibility Design Guidelines, Ministry of the Environment (1998). Guidelines for Access of People
with Special Needs in Public Spaces (2001), the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare.
- 250 -
Design Guide for Accessible Beaches, The Ministry of Development (2003).

Methodology for Checking Accessibility in Public Services and Infrastructure, The Ministry of Interior
has published a (2008)
Public bodies (ministries and departments) have cooperated with disability NGOs on access issues
and actions over many years. The national organization of disability associations (ESAEA) must be
consulted (by law) on matters concerning people with disabilities. The private sector is not especially
involved in actions or programmes to improve accessibility.
Information about disabled people’s rights and accessibility is disseminated by Disability Now
(www.disabled.gr ) to disabled people and everybody who is interested and also by ESAEA
(www.esaea.gr ) and other disability organisations. Disability NGOs also participate in local, regional,
national and EU projects on accessibility.
Bodies that are checking conformity with legislation (public and others)
Building permit authorities (should) check the basic access requirements of submitted plans but
there is no follow up after construction.
Greek National Tourist Organisation makes checks of plans for hotels, rented rooms etc. in
connection with assessment for the star rating. Constructions are then checked to ensure
conformance with the awarded star category. Some accessibility requirements can vary according to
the star category, 1 to 5.
In recent years all municipalities have been directed to conduct accessibility conformance checking
and improvements for the outdoor environment and public buildings but implementation is very
weak.
There is no especially legislated procedure for procurement concerning accessibility of the built
environment. The access requirements that are foreseen in the applicable laws for every case must
be included in the general requirements of the procurement.
Accessibility measures are not systematically implemented generally. In the private sector, the access
requirements for lifts and level access / ramps to buildings are mainly considered but not
everywhere. Catering establishments should have a disabled toilet by law. Parking spaces for
disabled people are more common nowadays. There is no general awareness among architects to
use a Design for All approach in the whole project.
Building permit offices must study application plans to ensure conformity with the law. During
construction, the engineers of the public bodies follow the general implementation of the project but
specific conformity in relation to accessibility is not usually by a written procedure.
There are no obligatory courses in accessibility / Design for All at schools of architecture. Accessibility
might be taught within other lessons, depending on the lecturer’s knowledge and priorities.
Generally there are few experts on accessibility to the built environment in Greece. They are mainly
the architects and engineers involved in producing laws, guidelines and actions.
After the publication of the Ministry of Environment Design Guidelines, 1998, several courses were
given for municipalities with the co-operation of the Technical Chamber of Greece but today there is
no public body responsible for such training or for continued professional training in accessibility.
Most technicians/ planners do not have expert knowledge or awareness of accessibility requirements
and solutions.
- 251 -

Greece signed the CRPD on 30/3/2007. Greece has not signed the Optional Protocol, nor has Greece
ratified the convention, (as of 21/8/2010).
Action plans to remove barriers and improve accessibility are in progress at municipal level, directed
and coordinated by the Ministry of the Interior (circulars, conformity schemes with guidelines and
questionnaires).
No public funds are available for new (and existing) multi-level housing, single apartment and/or
family single homes to improve accessibility etc.
There is special legislation and action programmes to improve the accessibility of all existing public
buildings. The implementation and follow up is not yet effective. There is no public financial support
or incentives to improve the accessibility of privately-owned buildings (homes or businesses).
No awards are available which are considering accessibility in the built environment as a single
subject or as a strategy for sustainability.
Guidelines Designing for All (1998) issued by the Ministry of the Environment, Planning and Public
Works have become the de facto standard for access criteria / solutions.
The pedestrian route which unifies the archaeological sites in the centre of Athens is an example of
good practice in accessible urban design in an ancient city.
The Acropolis of Athens was provided with a platform lift and a vertical lift in 2004, making this
World Heritage Site at last accessible to wheelchair users.
Transport systems: the Athens Metro, Tram and Electric Railway systems are fully accessible since
2004, with lifts and tactile routes at every station.
The Design Guidelines for Beaches and access to the sea (Min. of Development) are very detailed and
well elaborated, but implementation is as yet very limited.
Complexity of legislation and many responsible authorities. Weak enforcement and weak follow-up.
Legislation focuses mainly on the requirements for mobility impaired people, especially wheelchair
users and blind people, which also apply to other “people facing obstacles”.
But there is less consideration for requirements of deaf people and those standardization, but use of
these standards is voluntary. On several areas of built environment, like safety of disabled people in
fire or special building types have no regulation regarding to the accessibility at all.
All of the regulations, standards and technical specifications must be used in case of public buildings
and facilities. Because they are structurally dispersed, thus sometimes contradicts are shown, it is
difficult to apply them in practice.
with hearing impairments and learning difficulties. Legislation does not refer to needs of people with
allergies
Blind routes – tactile pavements - are widespread (in Athens) but are not implemented properly in
many cases.
General awareness about accessibility and respect for disabled people’s rights is low, e.g. car parking
on pavements and dropped kerbs is common.
No education of students of architecture and engineering in accessibility / Design-for-All.
- 252 -
Activities to improve the existing building stock according accessibility

Action plans/ conformity scheme and circulars by the Ministry of Interior.
“Jason” Action plan by the ESAEA
G.2.12 Hungary
Rapporteur/Informant: Mónika Parti [parti.monika@gmail.com]
In Hungary the Government Decree on National Building Requirements (Government Decree No.
253/1997. (XII.20.)) contains the basic technical dates regarding to the accessibility of the built
environment which must be observed in the building permission process of new buildings and also
adaptation or refurbishment of existing buildings. The Ministry for National Economy is responsible
for legislation on this National Building Requirements.
The experience is that using only general technical dates described in National Building Requirements
do not result in expected level of accessibility. After the building permission process there is no real
follow-up on implementation of accessibility. The final construction drawing should contain all of the
necessary details, which determine the accessibility of the built environment basically. On this level
of the building process there is no conformity assessment, except those projects financed by
governmental bodies where rehabilitation engineers must be involved both in the planning and the
implementation process. In case of these projects the fruition of accessibility in the completion phase
is also must be proved.
Beside of the National Building Regulation there are some other departmental technical
specifications, which also must be kept. The Hungarian Standards Institution (HSI) has published
standards in reference to some special building constructions which are mostly based on CEN/ISO
Beside of the deficiency in legislation, the other difficulty is the incomplete and insufficient
knowledge of those persons involved in the planning and construction process. To fill this gap,
several design guidelines have been produced in order to give overall information about the different
types of disabilities and the effects of the built environment on disability. Although these design
guidelines are not mandatory, in practice, they give the most sufficient and useful functional
information and technical dates regarding to the accessible built environment.
The above mentioned design guidelines were developed by foundations or non-governmental
organizations, in corporation with professionals expert on universal design and accessibility of the
built environment.
---
---
In the education of architects the accessibility question is emphasised mostly through the student
design projects. The main goal should be that all of the subjects contain accessibility-related parts in
their own context. At the Budapest University of Technology Economics, Faculty of Architecture post
graduated, two year Rehabilitation Engineering Program was accredited eight years ago. Until
nowadays, more than hundred Rehabilitation Engineers graduated and work as architects or
- 253 -
consultant on different fields to promote the accessibility of the built environment for all. Most of
them are members of REKORE Rehabilitation Engineering Society of Hungary, www.rekore.hu.
The Budapest University of Technology and Economics coordinated the AWARD project (Accessible
World for All Respecting Differences) within the framework of the LEONARDO resulting in a richly
illustrated DVDavailable in five languages (download: www.mfk.unideb.hu/profzold or on disc at
request). The aim of the project was to produce electronic teaching material demonstrating the
concepts of universal design in the built environment. The objective is to include the necessary
knowledge in the curricula of vocational and higher technical institutes.
---
To improve implementation of accessibility in the built environment the Hungarian government
through the New Hungary Development Plan found adaptation or refurbishment of existing public
buildings and building new ones. Besides, VÁTI Public Non-profit Company invites entries for a
competition of “Accessible Building of the Year” regularly. The award goes to buildings mostly meet
the accessibility requirements.
Conclusion regarding accessibility in the built environment#
---
G.2.13 Ireland
Eoin O’Herlihy [eoin@accessconsultancy.ie]
Fionnuala Rogerson [fionnuala.rogerson@rogerson.ie]
The principal legislation that covers accessibility to the built environment in Ireland includes:
Building Control Acts (1990 – 2007)Enabling legislation for the control of standards in design and
construction under which building regulations and building control regulations are made. Includes
provisions for access for people with disabilities (Part M).
Employment Equality Act (1998 – 2004)Requires employers to make reasonable accommodation for
employees including adapting premises and equipment
Equal Status Acts (2000 & 2004)Requires reasonable accommodation of people with disabilities in
the provision of goods, services and accommodation, including access to premises and information,
and access to education
Disability Act 2005Contains specific accessibility requirements for public sector organisations to
make their buildings more accessible, to improve access to their services, to consider access in the
procurement process, to make information to which the public have access more accessible and to
improve access to heritage sites.
Authorities responsible for legislation on accessibility in the built environmentinclude the
Departments of Environment, Heritage & Local Government and the Department of Community,
Equality and Gaeltacht Affairs. Other departments with responsibilities include Health & Children,
Transport, Enterprise, Trade & Innovation and Social Protection. The Department of Environment is
responsible for Planning and Building Control legislation through the Local Authorities. The National
Disability Authority (NDA) is a state agency that provides independent expert advice to Government
on policy and practice.
- 254 -
Part M of the Building Regulations (Access for People with Disabilities) was introduced in 1991. The
current Part M regulation (Access and Use) was updated in 2010 and its aim is now less focused on
disability and more on inclusion for all. The regulation is performance based and is supported by a
technical guidance document. The regulation covers access and use of buildings. It applies to all new
buildings, to extensions, to material alterations of existing buildings, and to material changes of use.
It also applies to dwellings but only to the extent of achieving visitability. The 2010 technical
guidance includes a separate section for existing buildings for use where the higher standards for
new buildings cannot be achieved if it is impracticable. Guidance on many building types is limited.
Primary responsibility for compliance with building regulations in Ireland rests with designers,
builders and building owners with minimal resources available within the local authorities to enforce
and control the regulations. This has resulted in relatively poor compliance levels. Up to 2009 no
prior approvals or permits were required apart from the requirement to obtain a Fire Safety
Certificate. In 2009 a Disability Access Certification Scheme was introduced which now requires all
works, other than dwellings, to obtain a Disability Access Certificate (DAC) prior to the building being
opened, occupied, or used.
There are currently no Irish national standards developed for accessibility of the built environment
and British Standards are commonly used. The National Disability Authority has published a
comprehensive guidance document on best practice for accessibility of the built environment
Building for Everyonewhich is currently being revised by the Centre for Excellence in Universal Design
(CEUD). The revised version is due for publication in 2011. The NDA/CEUD has also published national
codes of practice and guidelines on Accessible Maritime Transport, for Public Transport Operators
and for ICT and Public Access Terminals.
The National Standards Authority of Ireland (NSAI) has established an Accessibility for All Standards
Consultative Committee (AASCC) in 2005. A working group of this committee focuses on access to
the built environment and is actively involved in the development of ISO DIS 21542.
The NSAI recently provided training to people with disabilities, disability organisations and people
involved in developing national and international standards as part of the EC “Stand4All” project.
Since the training has taken place the NSAI Access for All Standards Consultative Committee has
established Working Group 7 to initiate training on the implementation of CEN/CLC Guide 6.
Other statutory and non statutory/voluntary bodies have published accessibility design guidelines
including the Local government Management & Services Board (LGMSB), the Irish Wheelchair
Association (www.iwa.ie), the National Council for the Blind of Ireland (www.ncbi.ie) , DeafHear and
the Association of Occupational Therapists.
There are no formal arrangements with such bodies to check conformity with legislation.
A Centre for Excellence in Universal Design (CEUD) was established by the NDA in 2007 under the
Disability Act 2005. The main role of the centre is to contribute to the development and promotion
of standards, education & professional development, and awareness of Universal Design in three
areas – Built Environment, Products & Services and Information Technology.
The EU Directive 2004/18/EC was transposed into Irish legislation in Statutory Instrument No 329 of
2006. It includes provisions for accessibility and specific rules governing specifications and contract
documents. It requires a contracting authority, when awarding a public contract, to ensure, as far as
practicable, that the technical specifications for the contract take account of the need to prescribe
accessibility criteria for all persons who are likely to use the relevant works, products or service,
particularly those who have disabilities.
- 255 -
Section 27 of the Disability Act 2005 requires that services supplied to Public Bodies are accessible to
persons with disabilities, unless it would not be practicable or justifiable on cost grounds or would
result in an unreasonable delay. The NDA is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the
Disability Act including the section on public procurement. In 2008 an NDA survey on Accessibility of
Public Services and Information provided by Public Bodies identified that 39.5% of public bodies
reported having policies and 26.0%, procedures in place to ensure that goods and services supplied
to them are accessible to people with disabilities. Just 36.5% of survey respondents reported having
made changes to tender documentation under their control, to include accessibility criteria in the
tender or tender scoring process.
Conformance Assessment Schemes exist principally in the area of Planning and Building Control as
operated by the Local Authorities. These schemes commence reasonably early in the design process
but are mainly reliant on a process of voluntary “self-certification”. The Disability Access Certificate
scheme, mentioned in paragraph 2 above is a recent development and it will be interesting to assess
its impact in 2 / 3years time. Its operation is proving controversial in some areas as there is wide
variation between Building Control Authorities with regards to the interpretation of the functional
requirements, in particular where the technical guidance is inadequate. A positive feature is that
most designers are now acutely aware of the need to comply with the regulation.
There are no legally binding instruments requiring the formal training of built environment
professionals in accessibility. A number of under graduate and post graduate courses do include
modules on accessibility and inclusive / universal design and some courses integrate it across all
subjects. For the past 10 years the post graduate training leading to registration of professional
architects has included accessibility as a core component of the course and examination. Training of
those involved in public procurement would appear to be very limited.
Ireland has signed the UN Convention but has not yet ratified it. The Irish National Disability Strategy
was launched in 2005 and addresses some key areas of the Convention including accessibility of the
built environment. However, as yet the Strategy does not extend to civil / political rights.
The National Disability Strategy is targeted towards the full integration of people with disabilities into
the social, cultural, economic and political life of the country. It includes a national action plan and 6
sectoral plans, the implementation of which is monitored on an annual basis.
A new housing policy for people with disabilities is currently in development and due to be published
by the Department of Environment in 2011.
Excellence Through Accessibility Awards (EtA Award)–This award scheme aims to objectively
examine and encourage the accessibility of buildings, services and information technology provided
by Government Departments and Agencies under their remit. (www.nda.ie)
O2 Ability Awards – Irish business awards which recognise best practice for the inclusion of people
with disabilities as customers, employees and members of the community. One of the Ability Awards
categories focuses on environmental accessibility and measure how accessible the organisations built
environment is.
ABLE Business Excellence Award is a Quality mark for accessibility in business and was launched by
REHAB and Excellence Ireland in 2009.
RIAI / OPW Accessibility Award forms part of the Architects’ Institute (RIAI) annual awards, and is
sponsored by the office of Public Works. It is presented to the architects and building owner for the
most accessible building.
- 256 -
Kanchi Network(www.kanchi.org)is a recently established business network designed to effect

change in attitudes to disability through business
Grantsare available for housing adaptations and mobility aids for people with physical, sensory,
intellectual or mental health needs. The adaptations grant is means tested.
Good practices:
New building regulation now focused on Access for All. Improved technical guidance.
Standards Authority looking at gaps in national standards in conjunction with CEUD
Most projects procured as PPP (public private partnerships) include accessibility in briefs
EtA Award scheme a good model for improving accessibility within public bodies
Weak points and gaps:
Absence of effective & consistent Building Control / Conformance Assessment System
Limited Training/Awareness/Education/CPD and no professional accreditation of courses
No Irish / CEN Standards for external environments, and for auditing / certification
No systems for monitoring the management of accessibility within the built environment
Starting points for improvement:
Increase resources for building control and levels of inspection. Introduce mandatory self-
certification by registered certifiers.
Strengthen accessibility in planning policies for wider environment and ensure greater co-ordination
between local authority planning and building control
Develop good practice management protocols for accessibility of specific building types
Consider establishment of local “Access Boards” (as in Australia) or “Access Ombudsman” with
authority to rule on difficult access problems within specified timeframe.
In public procurement all public bodies to include a statement of the accessibility objective of their
policy / procedure. Suppliers to be asked to highlight accessibility features of their products / services
and technical expertise in accessibility to be sought from tenderers
Existing building stock:
Improve guidance on acceptable standards
Link funding mechanisms to access improvements and develop incentives
G.2.14 Italy
Paola Bucciarelli [p.bucciarelli@4inclusion.eu]
Arch. Mitzi Bollani [studio@mitzibollani.com]
The principal legislation that covers accessibility to the built environment in Italy includes:
Legge 9 gennaio 1989, n.13: "Disposizioni per favorire il superamento e l'eliminazione delle barriere
architettoniche negli edifici privati." (Measures to encourage the overcoming and removal of
architectural barriers in private buildings)
- 257 -
National law 13 in 1989 introduced conceptual innovations at legislative level, which have now
become part of the common language of planners: accessibility, visitability, adaptability, which
defines three levels of usability.
The purpose is that of activating a planning process which gradually leads to full usability of buildings,
in order to increase everyone’s quality of life.
Decreto Ministeriale - Ministero dei Lavori Pubblici 14 giugno 1989, n. 236: "Prescrizioni tecniche
necessarie a garantire l'accessibilità, l'adattabilità e la visitabilità degli edifici privati e di edilizia
residenziale pubblica sovvenzionata e agevolata, ai fini del superamento e dell'eliminazione delle
barriere architettoniche." (Technical requirements necessary to ensure accessibility, adaptability &
visitability of private buildings and public housing, in order to remove architectural barriers)
Decreto del Presidente della Repubblica 24 luglio 1996, n. 503: "Regolamento recante norme per
l'eliminazione delle barriere architettoniche negli edifici, spazi e servizi pubblici." [Rules for the
removal of architectural barriers in public buildings, spaces and public services)
Authorities responsible for legislation on accessibility in the built environmentinclude the Ministero
dei Lavori Pubblici (Ministry of Public Works), Ministero per le Pari Opportunità (Minister for Equal
Opportunity), Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti (Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport),
Regional and Local Government. Other departments with responsibilities include Welfare, Enterprise,
Social Affairs. The Departments of Public Works, Environment, Welfare and Social Affairs, are
responsible for Planning and Building Control legislation through the Local Authorities.
Italy was one of the first Countries in Europe provided with a National Act on accessibility (D.P.R. n.
384 dated 27th April 1978) repealed by the National Act (D.P.R. n. 503 dated 24th July 1996).
Actually In Italy there are 4 National Acts:
- L. n. 13/1989 related to accessibility in private building, both new and existing;
- D.M. n. 236/1989 standards and guides on accessibility for internal and external environment;
- L. n. 104/1992 related to accessibility in public building and spaces, that act is very important
because at paragraph 7 it fixes penal sanctions for architect, builder and mayor;
- and the above mentioned Act D.P.R. n. 503/1996 that lays down functional requirements duties for
the built environment in general, both private and public, both internal and external.
Some Regions have their specific legislation such as Liguria, Lombardia, Veneto as well as different
Municipalities include accessibility requirements in their local Building Regulations.
Three Authorities are responsible of the work: the architect who makes the project, the builder who
makes the construction, the mayor who gives the building permission. All they three are responsible in
front of the Court and they have to pay penal sanctions in case of mistakes.
The current state building regulation on private buildings and public housing and open-to-public
buildings (D.M. 236/89) dates from 1989. The current state building regulation on public building,
places and facilities (D.P.R. 503/96) dates from 1996. Quite all technical prescriptions of D.P.R.
503/96 make reference to technical prescriptions of D.M. 236/89.
Both these regulations are performance based and supported by examples and technical
suggestions. The regulation applies to all new buildings, to extensions and to material alterations of
existing buildings, also historical ones. The technical guidance is primarily focused on people with
mobility limitation with less guidance for people with other kind of impairments (e.g., sensory,
cognitive).
Primary responsibility for compliance with building regulations in Italy rests with designers, builders
and building owners with minimal resources available within the local authorities to enforce and
control the regulations. This has resulted in relatively poor compliance levels.
- 258 -
There is not an external professional that checks and signs the accessibility level of the building/
space.
The architect, who made the project, signs a self declaration on the accessibility of the building/space
he designed.
Gaps: Education at University does not include accessibility. Few people have a deep knowledge on it.
If a person checks that a building is not built according with the regulation, the only proceeding is to
denounce to the Court, but it is too long and expensive and people renounce if they are not directly
involved.
Accessibility of existing buildings has the same requirements as of new buildings
There are currently no Italian national standards developed for accessibility of the built environment.
No one has published a reliable comprehensive guidance document on “best practice for accessibility
of the built environment”, although hundreds of leaflets, publications and manuals about the
removal of architectural barriers are printed every year.
UNI – Italian National Standard did not publish any accessibility standards for construction, built
environment. They said because they find D.M. n. 236 – 1989 “standards and guides on accessibility
for internal and external environment” enough. None as well is done about building products.
Many statutory and non statutory/voluntary bodies have published accessibility design guidelines
but there are no formal arrangements with such bodies to check conformity with legislation.
Accessibility guidelines are produced by architects under the mandate of the Government Authorities,
Regions and Municipalities.
There is good participatory process with related NGOs on the development of legislation.
Architects make their certification on their done work and the Municipalities check their
documentations and make the inspection.
Developer is responsible of checking conformity with the legislation. The local building committee
(Municipality) has a supervisory responsibility. In few Regions like Liguria and Lombardia, where
Regional Laws on accessibility exist, a certified Architect is the only one that can give the approval
The Italian Public Procurement is regulated by a Public Procurement Act : Decreto Legislativo n. 163
of 12th April 2006, “Codice dei contratti pubblici relativi a lavori, servizi e forniture in attuazione delle
direttive 2004/17/CE e 2004/18/CE". There is not a special legislated procedure in it because
somehow all the National Laws must be respected.
Are new building projects with work places, offices, shops etc. in general now accessible in your
country – and to what extent? They must be. If they do not, it is for mistake.
Conformance Assessment Schemes exist principally in the area of Building Control as operated by the
Local Authorities. These schemes commence reasonably early in the design process but are mainly
reliant on a process of “self-certification”.
Conformity assessment schemes are available and introduced, first of all at design level, then before
the building is handed over. All the new public buildings or private buildings for public use are
inspected before the permit to open by a Social Health Department.
Which bodies are involved? Architects, Builders, Municipality Authorities, Local Health System .
- 259 -

There are no legally binding instruments requiring the formal training of built environment
professionals in accessibility. At the moment, a few number of under graduate and post graduate
courses do include modules on accessibility and inclusive/universal design/design for all.
Training of those involved in public procurement would appear to be very limited.
Many Universities are developing educational voluntary schemes in the field of accessibility and
Design for All, as well as other bodies or NGO.
Facultative or obligatorily introduced in the curricula for different professionals?Facultative
Italy has signed the UN Convention and ratified it.
DPI Italia Onlus
(http://www.dpi.org/, http://www.make-development-inclusive.org/partner.php?spk=en&nb=10)
together with other national associations of people with disabilities are deeply involved in addressing
all the areas of the Convention including universal design approach, accessibility of the built
environment and reasonable accommodation issues.
Actions plans are still under study.
Italy works on accessibility action plans since 1988 using Government Fund.
Are there any new actions / policies to implement accessibility in the near future at national or
regional level?Implementation of accessibility in Historical Building.
Concorso Internazionale di Idee “Progettare e realizzare per tutti”:
(http://www.lospiritodistella.it/attivita.html).
Concorso nazionale “Muoversi nell’immobile”
(http://www.progettarepertutti.org/news/MUOVERSInellIMMOBILE_bando.pdf)
Grants are available for housing adaptations and mobility aids for people with physical, sensory,
intellectual or mental health needs.
We have much initiative , but none of them are continued. That is a weak point.
Italy has Government fund for private people who need their existing house accessible.
We have initiative to improve accessibility in existing & public housing.
Many Municipality, Region and NGOs every year promote Awards on accessibility on different
subject : accessible university, tourism for all, accessible bar and pubs, new accessible design for
Autogrill, etc.
Good practices:
Effective, clear and quite complete accessibility laws focused on “Universal Design”
Well-written and well-illustrated technical manuals for Designers.
Award schemes are improving accessibility within designers
Accessibility in many ancient buildings such as Coliseum in Rome, Vatican Museum in Rome, Egyptian
Museum in Turin, etc.
Weak points and gaps:
- 260 -
Designers tend to read and implement only prescriptive/dimensionaI solutions by the norm that
refer almost exclusively to wheelchair users needs. This happens for two main reasons:
Designers haven’t received suitable curricular training on Accessibility issue and Universal Design
The people (who are not always designers!) responsible for controlling a project and the solutions
carried out:
- haven’t received appropriate training on this subject
- tend to check accessibility only partially and ignore the context and final users of the space
- tend to check almost always the same things (i.e., dimensions of a bathroom but not the
height of the sanitary fittings), often based on precepts of a repealed norm (D.P.R. 384/78)
Weak educational program at school level, weak spread of good practices, weak level of accessibility
in hotels.
As a result, many designers comply with the controllers’ requests - to the detriment of final users -
just to avoid problems.
No Standards Authority looking at gaps in and between national and local standards
Absence of effective & consistent Building Control / Conformance Assessment System
Very limited Training/Awareness/Education and no professional accreditation of courses
No systems for monitoring the management of accessibility within the built environment
Most important starting points for improvement
Education and training for architect and public employers.
Activities to improve the existing building stock according accessibility
It would be great if documents on sustainable environment could include protection and support of
Human diversities and social sustainability.
G.2.15 Latvia
G.2.16 Lithuania
Rapporteur/Informant: Kristina Smailyte (ANEC) {Kristina.Smailyte@anec.eu}
Law on the Social Integration of the Disabled of the Republic of Lithuania
(Lietuvos Respublikos Neįgaliųjų socialinės integracijos įstatymas)
http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter2/dokpaieska.showdoc_l?p_id=373285
Art. 3, par. 6: the principle of accessibility for disabled people
Art. 11: Accessibility in built environment for disabled. According to the article, it is required to
consider the accessibility in built environment for disabled in all areas of life when planning new
territories and designing new buildings - public and private, when constructing public transportation
objects and when adjusting informational environment to appropriate the needs of the disabled.
The main procedures for making the built environment accessible for disabled are established in the
Technical Regulation for Construction (Order of the Minister for Environment on Approval of
Technical Regulation STR 2.03.01:2001: “Construction and Territories. Requirements for Needs of
Disabled People”, No. 317)
http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter2/dokpaieska.showdoc_l?p_id=139277&p_query=&p_tr2=
- 261 -
Law on Construction of the Republic of Lithuania
(Lietuvos Respublikos statybos įstatymas)
http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter3/dokpaieska.showdoc_l?p_id=378329
Art. 6, par. 3: Design, construction, reconstruction and major repairs of buildings and engineering
works must be carried out in such a way that they will satisfy the specific needs of the disabled
persons in compliance with the Law on Social Integration of Disabled People. This provision does not
apply for reconstructions of dwelling houses.
Technical Regulation for Construction:
Par. 4: This regulation complies with the European Union standard ISO/TR 9527:1994(E) which
established the minimum requirements for accessibility in the built environment for disabled people
(Technical Report ISO/TR 9527:1994(E) Building construction - Needs of the Disabled People in
Buildings - Design Guidelines).
Other standrads from the website of Lithuanian Standards Board:
http://www.lsd.lt/typo_new/index.php?id=en
Safety rules for the construction and installation of lifts - Existing lifts - Part 82: Improvement of the
accessibility of existing lifts for persons including persons with disability (CEN/TS 81-82:2008)
Guidelines for standards developers to address the needs of older persons and persons with
disabilities (CEN/CENELEC Guide 6:2002, modified)
The Department for the Affairs of Disabled at the Ministry of Social Security and Labour
Local authorities
Law on Public Procurement of the Republic of Lithuania
(Lietuvos Respublikos viešųjų pirkimų įstatymas)
Lithuanian version with latest
amendments:http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter3/dokpaieska.showdoc_l?p_id=387337
English version without latest amendments:
http://www.vpt.lt/admin/uploaded/VPI_vertimas_2007_red.pdf
Art. 25 Technical Specifications:
Par. 1: Supplies, services or works in procurement shall be described in technical specifications
contained in contract documents. Certain definitions of technical specifications shall be given in
Annex 3 to this Law. Whenever possible these technical specifications should be defined so as to take
into account accessibility criteria for people with disabilities or design for all users.
---
---
- 262 -

On 8 December 2010 the Government of the Republic of Lithuania adopted the decision on the
implementation of UN Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its optional protocol.
As a result, several national institutions responsible for the implementation of the Convention were
appointed.
http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter3/dokpaieska.showdoc_l?p_id=388475&p_query=&p_tr2=

---
The legal basis for the accessibility in built environment is rather well established, however, several
problems still exist that need to be solved. For instance, due to the lack of the effective surveillance
mechanism the new buildings are often recognized as suitable for use although in practice they fail to
comply with several requirements of the Technical Regulation for Constructions (the National
Strategy for Social Integration of the Disabled for 2010-2012)
G.2.17 Luxembourg
Silvio Sagramola: eca@eca.lu
& Yannick Breuer
In Luxembourg regulations around accessibility were limited to some safety criteria in public schools
until 2001.
In 1999, the Ministry of Family (responsible for disability questions in Luxembourg) trusted the
national disability information and meeting centre Info-Handicap to setup an interdisciplinary
workgroup and to develop accessibility criteria to be anchored in a national legislation.
The members of the group analyzed the existing approaches at European level and adapted them to
the national situation in order to come up with a set of recommendations to be published in a
document called “Guide des Normes”.
(http://www.welcome.lu/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=7&Itemid=87)
In parallel an “interministerial committee” worked on the elements to be included in the legislation.
The new legislation was composed of 2 parts:
- the main law
(http://www.welcome.lu/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=68&Ite
mid) that anchored the obligation for accessibility of all new “public” buildings and all
“public” buildings to be substantially renovated;
- the technical execution text of the law
(http://www.welcome.lu/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=67&Ite
mid ) precising the type of buildings, the elements, and the accessibility criteria to consider
The law was (and still is) limited to “public” buildings, meaning buildings built or rented with public
money by national or municipal authorities. The criteria address mainly spaces meant for the
“visitors”.
- 263 -

---
The control activities if the legislation is implemented are placed under the authority of a
Governmental body, the “national office for safety in the public administration”. This body works
with agreed companies, in general specialized in safety and energy saving activities, and trusts them
with the accessibility controls. The law foresees that all checked buildings should be identifiable
through a particular label, but this has never been done.
Public procurement activities in Luxembourg follow strict rules and the mandatory technical sheets
for responding to calls have to be downloaded from a Governmental server. Although the recent
Directives on public procurement have been transposed in Luxembourg, including the options for
accessibility and for social criteria, the technical sheets do not yet take on board accessibility in a
consequent way and the process for adapting them is quite heavy as it must be done in co-operation
with the professional Chambers of each single profession.
Any accessibility related activity in the private sector (shops, restaurants, hotels, etc…) is purely
volunteer and Info-Handicap, together with several partners hasset up a National Accessibility
Concept.
(http://www.welcome.lu/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=69&Itemid=87)
carried out by the MEGA (Multidisciplinary Experts Group for Accessibility) in order to raise
awareness, provide technical guidance and organize training activities for the private sector. The
concept includes also a label called “EureWelcome” to identify the private buildings that have been
assessed.
---
As there is no school for architecture in Luxembourg, the raising of awareness at that level has to
take place via special actions and information sessions organized on the initiative of Info-Handicap.
Although there is a general awareness towards the importance of an accessibility/design for all
approach, experience and consequence are lacking.
---
---
For the time being, the situation in Luxembourg can be summarized as follows:
There is a general “good-will” attitude towards accessibility, but only as long as there are no costs
Technicians are lacking information and craftsmen rely to architects (“I install what they tell me”)
Lobbying of people with disabilities is quite poor in Luxembourg
G.2.18 Malta
Rapporteur/Informant: Dr. Joseph Spiteri [joseph.spiteri@um.edu.mt]
- 264 -

The Equal Opportunities (Persons with disabilities) Act of 2000 provides the framework legislation
making it unlawful to discriminate against persons with disabilities in a number of areas including the
built environment.
Following the enactment of this legislation the body charged with its administration, i.e. the National
Commission for Persons with Disabilities (KNPD), published recommended standards for the built
environment – Access for All Design Guidelines. The 2nd edition was published in 2005 and since then
certain aspects are being reviewed and updated section by section.
Thus the accessibility guidelines provide the ‘nuts and bolts’ regarding dimensions but the authority
is based on the anti discrimination act.
These guidelines have been adopted by the Malta Environment and Planning Authority (MEPA), the
body responsible of issuing development permission in Malta, as an official Planning document by
Ministerial decree.
The Access for All Design Guidelines (KNPD:2005) are the relevant de facto Building Regulations
concerning accessibility.
None that I am aware of.
The KNPD is the main body addressing these issues on a national scale.
Clauses / conditions regarding accessibility are generally included in public procurement documents.
This works in two related ways.
At planning stage all planning applications for development permission regarding public – access
buildings are vetted by the KNPD to control for compliance to the Access for All Design Guidelines.
This procedure is under the guidance of KNPD consultant architect. Proposals that do not get
approval from KNPD are not generally approved by MEPA. Hence no planning permit is approved
without it being in compliance with accessibility requirements.
The EOCU (Equal Opportunities Compliance Unit) runs a conformance assessment on buildings
(which includes a site inspection by KNPD architect), this is sometimes carried out in conjunction with
the procedures related to the issue of Compliance Certificate (i.e. certificate that constructed
building conforms to approved plans in development permission)
Accessibility issues are taught in the general design education at the Faculty of the Built Environment
at the University of Malta.
Seminars for practising architects have been held as well as for representatives of local
administrative councils.
Legislation is being reviewed with this aim in mind. Naturally this is a time consuming process.
Funding schemes are available to Local (administrative) Councils to improve accessibility within their
respective jurisdictions. Some projects have already been realised.
- 265 -

Since the enactment of the relevant legislation in the year 2000, (the disability anti discrimination Act
was the first Act of the Maltese Parliament in the new millennium), there has been a noticeable
improvement in awareness and actual accessibility within the built environment in Malta. The
National Commission for Persons with Disabilities which was set up in the 1980’s has been the main
motor in championing the cause.
With the introduction of formal procedures within the Planning Permission Process coupled with the
publication of accessibility guidelines the improvement in accessibility is a continuing, if somewhat
time consuming and long term process.
G.2.19 Netherlands
Rapporteur/Informant:Delfin Jimenez [d.jimenez@eqar.es]
History
There are laws and regulations requiring that public places are made accessible and that housing is
made accessible. The following measures are promoted to facilitate accessibility in the build
environment: marking parking areas, installing lifts and accessible toilets, access to public places,
improving accessibility in housing, financial support for adapting private buildings and providing for
specially adapted motor vehicles.
Provisions for special transport require municipalities to provide facilities for transporting disabled
residents (either by collective transport or by cash payments).
Sign language for deaf people has no officially recognized status so far. A Committee on Sign
Language is working on this issue. However, it is used as the first language in education of deaf
people.
There are Government measures for encouraging media to make their information services available,
e.g. sign language of certain TV-programmes.
The following measures are being taken to make other forms of public information services available:
1. Advisory service for the disabled with the Netherlands Telephone Company,
2. Television services for the mentally disabled. The following services are provided in order to
facilitate information and communication between persons with disabilities and other persons:
literature in Braille/tape, news magazines on tape/Braille, sign language interpretation available on
request, easy readers for persons with mental disabilities, electronic reading of daily news papers
and news magazines (via a computer) and text-telephone for the deaf.
Legislation
The Dutch Building Decrre in his chapter 4 defines requirements for accessibility on buildings.
Provisions for special transport are included in the Facilities for the Disabled Act (WVG)
Authorities
Accessibility in the build environment is observed by: national authority, local Governments and by
local platforms of the disabled (on a voluntary basis, not regulated by law).
---
---
- 266 -

Government campaigns
Since the adoption of the Rules the Government has supported many campaigns conveying the
message of full participation. These include: Dissemination of the Standard Rules; Support of NGOs
propagating the message of full participation; a research project with regard to non-discrimination;
Integration of the basic principles of the Standard Rules in the long-term programme for an
intersectoral policy on the disabled, 1995-1998.
Organizations and NGOs
There are two national umbrella organizations:
1. The organization of the physically disabled.
2. The organization for the mentally disabled.
All relevant organizations are represented cooperating closely. According to the decree established
by the Interministerial Steering Group on policy for the disabled - an advisory body to the Dutch
Government - The Group maintains contacts with the umbrella organizations of the disabled.
Disability organizations are often consulted when laws and regulations with a disability aspect are
being prepared. This occurs at national, regional and local level. The Government provides financial
and consultative support to organizations. Disabled persons participate to a limited extent in
judiciary, to some extent in Government, legislature and in political parties and to a great extent in
NGOs. The disabled persons' organizations have the role to: advocate rights and improved services,
to mobilize disabled persons, to identify needs and priorities, to participate in the planning,
implementation and evaluation of services and measures, to contribute to public awareness and to
promote services.
Co-ordination of work
The national co-ordinating committee is reporting to the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport but
also to other relevant Ministries. The committee also submits reports to a sub-council of the Cabinet.
The committee includes representatives of several Ministries. No representatives of NGOs, and of
the private sector are included. Organizations of disabled people are included, having a consultative
status. The Government expects the committee to participate in policy development and to perform
other tasks. For instance, to identify gaps in legislature and eliminate obstacles experienced by the
disabled. The co-ordinating committee has had the following effects: improved co-ordination of
measures/programmes, improved legislation, improved integration of responsibility, more effective
use of resources and improved promotion of public awareness.
The adoption of the Standard Rules has led to a rethinking of the approach to disability policy.
---
---
---
Since the adoption of the Rules the Government has supported many campaigns conveying the
message of full participation. These include: Dissemination of the Standard Rules; Support of NGOs
propagating the message of full participation; a research project with regard to non-discrimination;
Integration of the basic principles of the Standard Rules in the long-term programme for an
intersectoral policy on the disabled, 1995-1998.
- 267 -

---
---
G.2.20 Poland
Ewa Kuryłowicz *ewakuryl@apaka.com.pl+
Chiara Giovannini[chiara.Giovannini@anec.eu]
Accessibility requirements are explicitly addressed through building legislation in the Building Law,
The Law on Spatial Planning and many regulations connected with them.
Act of 7July 1994 - Building Law (Art.5) with further amendments,
Decree of Minister of Infrastructure on technical requirements for buildings and their location,
published on 12 April 2002
Building regulations are valid since 1995, specific requirements issued as the ordinance are being
constantly updated, aimed mainly at the needs of wheelchair users with some general
recommendations concerning blind people.
The Polish Standardization Committee (www.pkn.pl) has a Technical Committee nr. 1 created
especially for dealing with the problems of disabled people. The secretary’ s name is Marta Piwowar.
Now the Committee is dealing with the PN-EN 12183, andEN 12183. Generally in the field of
accessibility many European norms are being translated into Polish. PKN has a status of observer in
watching the works connected with the norm ISO 21542.
All EU standards, Technical Reports and CEN/CLC Guide 6 were implemented to the national
standardization system.
Several organizations dealing with this area e.g. the TUS organization in Warsaw.
Ministry of Infrastructure http://www.en.mi.gov.pl/
The General Office of Building Control http://www.gunb.gov.pl/
Polish Committee for Standardization http://www.pkn.pl/?lang=en&pid=en_strona_glowna
The Polish city of Gdynia was one of the partners in Build for All program finished in 2006 should
have more experience about the outcome and effect of this program. The extent of implementing
the recommendations included there in the practice of public procurement could be required from
City Gdynia’s government..
Act of 29 January 2004 – Public Procurement Law http://www.uzp.gov.pl/cmsws/page/?F;356
Concerning the procedure of approving the specific design phases in the light of accessibility in
Poland there is a similar procedure within the process of obtaining the building permit. The Building
Design has to be verified and stamped by the specialist on Safety and Work Hygiene (BHP) who is
- 268 -
supposed an expert on accessibility, i.e. he or she has to know the regulations within this area. Then
the public buildings and some dwelling houses are turned when built it after the approval
procedures done by all kinds of experts, safety expert among them.
On the higher education level many design schools (architectural design, industrial design ) are
promoting the universal design approach and teach the relevant requirements (Warsaw, Kraków,
Gdaosk, Poznao, Wrocław, Lodz. All design courses require implementation of universal design
criteria as stated in the building regulation.
The problem of the accessibility requirements for the buildings is a part of the curriculum at the
technical universities.
All disability organizations dealing with this area of problems (TUS organization), see more here
www.niepelnosprawni.pl
Charter of the Rights of Person with Disabilities passed by Polish Parliament (Sejm) on 1 August 1997.
Each year government publish Annual Report on undertaken activities for realization of Charter’s
resolutions.
http://www.mpips.gov.pl/index.php?gid=385
www.niepelnosprawni.pl is the official website of the different organizations acting on behalf of
disabled people in Poland and integrating many of disabled people at the same time.
It is slowly getting improved. ISO 21542 is looked forward to as the source of detailed information
how to solve the specific problems when designing and building. The absence of that type of
reference is sometimes used as an excuse for people who do not understand the need of opening the
environment. There are many good examples of implementation of ‘universal design’ (The Kraków
system of Fast City Streetcar would be one of them) as well as many lost occasions when the level of
accessibility has not proved satisfactory. There are many situations when the needs of people with
visual impairments are being considered, for example the Polish Standardization Committee PKN ‘ s
website is accessible in a version for easier reading with yellow characters on the black background.
G.2.21 Portugal
Pedro Homem de Gouveia [pedro.gouveia@include.pt]
Natalia Giorgi [Natalia.Giorgi@anec.eu]
Two laws are central in making accessibility mandatory in Portugal: an anti-discrimination law (Law
no. 46/2006, enacted on August the 28th) and an accessibility law (decree-law no. 163/2006, enacted
on August the 8th).
Under the anti-discrimination law (Law 46/2006), refusal or limitation of access to the built
environment is classified as a discriminatory practice, prohibited and punishable by law. Under this
law, a victim of discrimination can seek compensation through lawsuit.
The accessibility law (Decree-Law 163/2006) established the accessibility standards and a set of rules
for its implementation, both in new buildings and in existing buildings (there’s a deadline, which ends
no later than 2017).
- 269 -
Accessibility requirements expressed in these laws, namely in Decree-Law 163/2006, have been
referred to in subsequent laws (for example, touristic sites).
There are rules to ensure accessibility of the built environment requiring that public places and
housing are made accessible.
- Law by decree 123/97, introduced on 22 May 1997 standards aimed at eliminating environmental
obstacles of the built environment
- Law by decree nº163/2006 (Regime da acessibilidade aos edificios e estabelecimientos que recebem
publico, via publica e edificios habitacionais) which establishes the legal framework for the access to
public buildings and buildings receiving public (e.g. theatres, cinemas, museums, post offices, etc.),
including those in construction, to make them accessible to all citizens.
Art 2: Standards on accessibility apply to all public infrastructure, buildings, outdoor environment
(parks), the land, sea and air transportation.
Art 4: All public administration - central, regional and local - as well as the public institutions and the
entities responsible for public procurement, have to certify and guarantee the execution of the laws,
regulations and standard established by this decree.
Art 14: NGOs representing and defending the rights of people with disabilities have the right to
propose or intervene in any actions related to the application of accessibility standards as mentioned
in the Annex.
- Guidelines to a better interpretation of DL n°163/2006, Guia acessibilidade e mobilidade para todo21
In Portugal, building regulations are set on a national basis. So the accessibility requirements were
set through Decree-Law 163/2006 referred above.
No, not yet. It’s still being translated by the national TC.
A few municipalities (local government) have been setting accessibility requirements, which are
complementary to the law and also mandatory. These requirements do not cover all the issues
touched by national legislation, but often detail requirements, or “raise the bar”, for specific
elements (e.g., pedestrian crossings, housing, etc.).
Accessibility in the built environment is observed by a national authority, the National Secretariat for
rehabilitation (Instituto nacional para a reabilitaçao) and by local governments.
The new public procurement law (Decree-Law 18/2008, enacted on January the 21st) states that
“whenever possible, technical specifications for goods to acquire or construction works to deliver
must be set in a way that includes characteristics that allow for the use by persons with disabilities or
any user.”
21
Sources:Guia acessibilidade e mobilidade, http://www.inr.pt/content/1/4/decretolei; Regime da acessibilidade aos
edificios e estabelecimientos que recebem publico, via publica e edificions habitacionais,
http://www.inr.pt/bibliopac/diplomas/dl_163_2006.htm; Independent Living Institute Report
http://www.independentliving.org/standardrules/InclInt_answers/Portugal.html
- 270 -
Codigo dos Contratos Publicos: Which transposes the European Directives on Public Procurement
(http://www.base.gov.pt/codigo/DocumentosCCP/Apresentação%20pública%20do%20CCP%20em%2
020080130.pdf)
---
Portugal subscribed the Resap 2001, a European resolution that recommends that all university
courses for future building professionals (namely architects and engineers) should integrate
Accessibility and Universal Design in their curricula. At present, implementation of this resolution
seems to be, at best, rather inconsistent. No public data exists for this specific issue, though.
The most difficult obstacles, when planning to build accessible environments, are attitudinal factors,
economic/budgetary factors, lack of knowledge, research and information, lack of user participation,
lack of co-operation from other organizations/institutions and lack of enforcement mechanism. There
is no disability awareness component incorporated in the training of planners, architects and
construction engineers22.
Portugal has signed and ratified both the Convention and the Optional Protocol. The Government has
recently presented the National Strategy for Disability, which has accessibility as a fundamental
matter.
Specific mention of disabled people is made in the Portuguese Constitution, art 71, which sets out the
principles of non discrimination.
Article 7123(Disabled citizens)
1. Citizens with physical or mental disabilities shall fully enjoy the rights and shall be subject to the
duties enshrined in this Constitution, save the exercise or fulfilment of those for which their condition
renders them unfit.
2. The state shall undertake a national policy for the prevention of disability and the treatment,
rehabilitation and integration of disabled citizens and the provision of support to their families, shall
educate society and make it aware of the duties of respect and solidarity towards such citizens, and
shall ensure that they effectively enjoy their rights, without prejudice to the rights and duties of their
parents or guardians.
3. The state shall support disabled citizens’ organisations.
This is supported by the 'Comprehensive Law of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Integration of
Handicapped Persons’ (1989). Although approved by Parliament, the law was not implemented and
was not wholly acceptable to disabled people as its definition of disability was limited and based on
the medical model, and it does not comply with the UN Standard Rules.
The UN Convention of the rights of Persons with disabilities has been approved by resolutions
n°56/2009 and n°57/2009 of the National Assembly, and was ratified by the following decrees
n°71/2009 and n°72/2009, in July 2009.
The National Rehabilitation Institute (INR) has an annual award for research on Disability-related
issues, including Accessibility.
22
Source: Independent Living Institute Report
http://www.independentliving.org/standardrules/InclInt_answers/Portugal.html
23
http://app.parlamento.pt/site_antigo/ingles/cons_leg/Constitution_VII_revisao_definitive.pdf
- 271 -
The National Institute for Housing and Urban Rehabilitation has an annual award for accessible
housing.
The Santa Casa da Misericórdia (a national charity), in partnership with the National Institute of
Architects, has an annual award for accessible architecture.
National plan for the promotion of accessibility: it establishes three basic objectives raise awareness,
inform and form. It further defines a set of measures to guarantee the implementation of the law on
accessibility n°163/200624
A lot is yet to be done, but one can say for sure that Portugal has been registering relevant progress
on Accessibility.
On the legal level, the context has changed significantly over the past four years: barriers are now
considered a discriminatory practice, whereas in the past they were considered no more than mere
disconformities with the building regulations that rarely were corrected. This change has made it
legally possible for the Disability community (either through its NGOs or individual members) to play
an important pressuring role, namely through lawsuits seeking compensation for discrimination.
The legal accessibility requirements underwent significant improvements (if one considers those
originally established in 1997), and the rules set by Decree-Law 163/2006 for their implementation
are much more rigorous. Accessibility is an indispensable condition for the issuance of a building
permit for new buildings, so the building sector is undergoing a change that is important, and yet
invisible (because it will only be seen in future buildings).
Furthermore, the accessibility requirements apply, also, to housing buildings, and that is a great step
towards not only accessibility but also future social sustainability.
Adaptation of existing public spaces and buildings will take a long time. Although the present
economic crisis will most probably slow the process, it is obviously important to have a rigorous
diagnosis of needs and a sensible plan for implementation the necessary corrections. Several cities
are now developing their accessibility plans, and an important question remains to be answered: will
they be successful?
A final word on the Tourism sector: the concept of accessible tourism seems to be slowly (but
steadily) gaining the attention of this sector.
G.2.22 Romania
Rapporteur/Informant: Isabela Nita [isabela.nita@carocert.ro]
Law 50- 1995 – Quality Construction law - as framework
NP 051- 2001 – Regulation for the adaptation of the civil buildings and urban areas to the
requirements of the persons with walking difficulties
And
Law no. 448/2006 - Regarding the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Disabled Persons
Law 50 – Quality Construction law - as framework
NP 051- 2001 – Regulation for the adaptation of the civil buildings and urban areas to the
requirements of the persons with walking difficulties
24
Source: Plano Nacional de Promoçao da Acessibilidade http://www.inr.pt/content/1/3/pnpa
- 272 -
No
National Authority for People with Disabilities under Ministry of Labour, Family and Social Protection.
All European directives on public procurement are adopted in Romania. There are not explicitly
requirements regarding accessibility of built environment or the capability of the providers regarding
accessibility. Each contracting authority is free to choose the relevant award criteria. Mostly used
award criteria are the lowest price.
There is a conformance scheme under control of the General Inspectorate for Building but
accessibility of built environment is poorly assessed in project or completion phase. Accessibility is
not an essential requirement against the plans for a building are normally checked when ask for
building permit.
There is also an assessment scheme for the accessibility of public building and urban spaces under
the control of National Authority for People with Disabilities under Ministry of Labour, Family and
Social Protection. They issued an annual report about the level of accessibility in Romanian cities
larger than 50000 habitants. The last report is for 2007. They used three criteria: 100% accessible,
partial accessible and notaccesible.
There is no formally initiative for such trainings. Some professionals were looking for such training
but on their own consideration.
The UN Convention was adopted in 2006 and is endorsed by Romanian Law 448/2006.
There was a public awareness campaign “Mobility for the disabled persons” financed by National
Authority for Disable People. http://mobilitateanph.ro/
There is no award. There is in place a system to finance disabled people. In 2010, was open to finance
application for services to familial support and to develop the administrative capacity of the
authority.
In Romania, the accessibility in built environment is poor assured. In the 2007 report, representative
of National Authority for Disable People appreciated that is a relative accessibility in the cities larger
than 50 000 habitants around 50% but almost 10 % is 100% accessible and 40% is partial accessible!
G.2.23 Slovakia
Rapporteur/Informant: Branislav Mamojka [mailto:mamojka@nrozp.sk]
Slovak legislation for access to the built environment for people with visual impairment:
Regulation of the Ministry of Environment SR nr. 532/2002 Coll.
This regulation states details concerning general technical requirements when constructing a building
as well as technical requirements with regard to people with limited mobility and orientation
facilities. The fourth part of the regulation deals with requirements with regard to people with
limited mobility and orientation abilities. In the Attachment to this regulation there are specific
technical requirements referring to barrier-free environment.
- 273 -
Regulation of the Ministry of Interior of SR. 9/2009 Coll.

This regulation states transportation regulations which define inclusive designarrangements for blind
and partially sighted people on pedestrian crossing like special road signaling.
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
The Slovak Blind and Partially Sighted Union among other things also develop activities in the area of
counseling related to prevention and removal of architectonic barriers with emphasis on people with
visual impairment.
Activities of the department for prevention of architectonic and transportation barriers are as
follows:
1. Providing consultations and counseling for professionals when including inclusive designprinciples
into architectonic proposals and building plans as well as when carrying out building constructions.
Easier mobility and orientation of a person with visual impairment are most often depicted in
proposals and implementations of roads and road structures including transportation systems.
Concerning structural engineering, we can talk most often about buildings of civil infrastructure also
some technical arrangements in housing areas.
2. Seminars focused on identification particular architectonic barriers, to introduce theoretical
principles and practical solutions as well as to define the most frequent problems – all with the
emphasis on a "design for al." Seminars are designed for architects, civil engineers and building
companies, representatives of local and regional authorities, environmental departments, building
offices.
3. Methodological activities. The main objective is to create understandable explanations of the
regulationof the Ministry of Environment SR nr. 532/2002 Coll. mainly through graphical depictions
of basic rules.
4.Dissemination of information concerning the issue of prevention and removing architectonic
barriers with the aim to inform professionals (architects and civil engineers), national and local
authorities and also the wide public. Through this activity we want to point out the possibilities of
removing architectonic barriers within the environment which often do not really require huge
financial investment or complicated architectonic changes, just a will to cooperate and an adequate
know-how.
- 274 -

---
G.2.24 Slovenia
Rapporteur/Informant?
Antidiscrimination mentioned in the constitution, however not in terms of accessibility
Zakon o graditviobjektov
Nacionalneusmeritvezaizboljšanje
Zakon o urejanjuprostora
No standards available
Ministry for the Environment
Directorate for the Disabled
NO
NO
Not existing up until now. At the moment slowly moving forward yet still on a very limited scale.
Yes, Dostopna Slovenia
Cultural Access for the Disabled
NO
---
G.2.25 Spain
Rapporteur/Informant: Francesc Aragall [direccio@proasolutions.com]
Spain has developed a clear advancement in the field of accessibility in the last 20 years although the
main improvements developed in the legislative terrain have not always being reflected in the reality
of the build environment.
The legislation situation is as follows:
Spain has signed and ratified de UN Convention.
There is a State Law (LIONDAU) to guarantee equal opportunities for people with disability that
stress the need for accessibility developed from a Design for All (DfA) perspective. The technical
- 275 -
requirements for fulfilling this Law are developed by Royal Decrees that invade the legislative
autonomy of the regions and some of them follow their own autonomic decrees.
The recent Technical Code for Buildings (CTE) contents a section called Safe Use and Accessibility
(SUA) with all technical requirements to guarantee accessibility in buildings (including egress in
emergencies). To follow this CTE is compulsory for obtaining the building permit. This has improved
the accessibility in private buildings but normally administrations don’t need the permit to build to
construct their own buildings therefore the level of accessibility in public buildings depends on the
own knowledge and willingness of each administration.
Several autonomic regions have updated recently their legislation producing very good documents
but there is not yet evidence of the level of fulfilment.
Catalonia will soon pass a Decree that stress the need for development of clear procurement,
management and conformity schemes (updating also the punishment tools) to guarantee the
accessibility in all the aspects of social life.
The main gap between legislation and reality comes from the fact that building projects are revised
but only in the case of dangerous activity in the building the ended works are inspected.
Another important gap comes from the details (bars, knobs, signals, etc.) normally not clearly
specified in the project and developed by the constructing company at its own criteria.
The accessibility criteria are, in general the same for new and existing buildings. The law that protect
historical buildings is used frequently to escape from accessibility legislation.
Last, but not least, and Spain is not a unique case, it seems that the “Star architects” can be “above
the law” and many infractions have been permitted to them.
The UNE 170.000, a standard developed by AENOR that, in a voluntary base, allows any organisation
to control and improve progressively the accessibility of their installations, products and services
following procedures similar to ISO 9000.
On the other hand, AENOR has developed along the years many standards related with accessibility
in the build environment that several legislations have assumed as compulsory.
Orders of architects or engineers have published in the past some texts to clarify or simplify the
legislative frame.
There are good participatory process with related NGO’s on the development of legislation.
Municipalities are the responsible administrations to control accessibility, in some cases the
inspection tasks are delegated to private auditing companies that check all quality and legal aspects
of the building.
The transposition of public procurement directives states clearly in the article 100 of the Public
Procurement Law the obligation to guarantee accessibility and DfA in every product or service
purchased (although it seems that nobody have read this article or don’t know how to put it into
practise)
But most of the procurement processes requires the generically the fulfilment of the law.
In practise that means that, in general, the recent developments are accessible although minor issues
and details show still errors in the construction process.
- 276 -

Almost all new commercial facilities (bars, schools, medium size shops, etc.) are inspected before the
permit to open.
All private permits to build oblige the approval of the project by the municipal authority.
Many universities (public and private) are developing education schemes (compulsory or voluntary)
in the field of accessibility and Design for All. Although the developments of these schemes are
compulsory according the LIONDAU these initiatives comes from the interest of local leaders
normally against the academy structures.
---
Thanks to the financial support from the IMSERSO (State), Once Foundation and structural EC Funds
many municipalities have developed accessibility plans that rarely are followed along the years
because they almost never adapted their management structures to include this issue.
The case of Barcelona and some other municipalities in Catalonia is exemplar in the fulfilment of
accessibility criteria in private building: To install elevators in private dwellings is financed up to 60%
if the project eliminates all the accessibility problems according to the law.
Legislative texts are consistent but there is a need for a harmonised legislation based on scientific
and international criteria.
Many companies from different sectors (tourism, banking, commerce, products, etc.) start to
perceive Design for All as a business opportunity beyond the legal obligations.
There is a need to establish clear conformity procedures, especially for build environment elements
were the administration is the promoter or the owner.
The key elements to improve are:
Development of conformity assessments, especially for buildings own by the administration not only
in the project phase but “as build” reports.
Unified policy for denounce and to punish non-inclusivity.
Tools to manage accessibility plans to guarantee follow up and monitor processes.
Extend the accessibility responsibility to the professionals who maintain the build environment and
who provide services in it.
Compulsory education for professionals related to the field.
In transport the weakest part is the taxi. No one administration in able to pass a valiant law that
really achieves a sufficient number of accessible taxis. There is a need for EC harmonisation in this
field and also an opportunity for research and innovation in the automotive industry
G.2.26 Sweden
Rapporteur/Informant:Elisabet Svensson [elisabet@handisam.se]
Accessibility requirements have been a part of the building legislation since the middle of the 1960th.
The building legislation is now covering buildings containing dwellings, working premises or premises
- 277 -
to which the general public has access which are built or rebuilt. It is also covering new construction
of public spaces and areas for constructions other than buildings (such as recreation areas).
Concerning existing environment the building legislation says that easily eliminated obstacles shall be
removed in existing public buildings and on public spaces.
The accessibility requirements are explicitly addressed through building legislation but also to some
extent in anti-discrimination acts (working-places and universities). There is now a proposal to extent
the discrimination act to other parts of the environment.
Moveable equipments and furniture like vending machines, desks etc are not covered.
In the building regulations there are mandatory functional requirements and recommendations that
can be functional or technical. The recommendations indicate how someone should or may act in
order to comply with the requirements of the mandatory provisions. That means that they are quite
strong and almost could be considered as mandatory.
The regulations are quite detailed that might be the reason there is not any special accessibility
standard.
There are some gaps in the regulations for example nothing is said about number of accessible hotel
rooms or places for wheelchair users in assembly halls.
The type of wheelchairs that should be possible to use is clearly defined and different indoors and
outdoors.
The building regulations are quite detailed and therefore there has not been considered to be any
need for a national accessibility standard. But there are some standards considering accessibility, for
example one standard about measures in dwellingsand one about symbols for signs. There are also
standards about acoustics that also consider accessibility issues. The building regulation refers to
some CEN standards.
Guide 6 has not yet been enough implemented in national standards. But there has been established
a technical committee working with co-ordination of accessibility standards and that also is supposed
to work with the implementation of Guide 6.
The National Board of Housing, Building and Planning are responsible for building regulations
including accessibility. Swedish Agency for Disability Policy Co-ordination is responsible for co-
ordination of the handicap policy. Swedish Transport Administration is responsible for accessibility to
transports. The Equality Ombudsman is responsible for discrimination issues.
Accessibility guidelines are produced by bodies like Governmental authorities. Many municipalities or
regions produce their own guidelines. Guidelines are also produced by organizations like Swedish
Association of Local Authorities and Regions, private information companies within the building
sector like Svensk Byggtjänst, Disability Organizations etc.
Building Committee within the municipality is responsible for plans (master plans, town plans,
building plans etc) and also for the supervision that the building legislation is followed within the
municipality. For example they can decide about sanctions if the building regulations are not
fulfilled.The County Administration Board has to support and supervise the Building Committee in
some questions regarding accessibility.
Public procurement is regulated by a Public Procurement Act but there is no special legislated
procedure concerning accessibility of the built environment.
- 278 -
New building projects in general are accessible. But in the same time there are quite often mistakes,
often details for example concerning way finding.
The site is inspected in connection to building permit (by the local Building Committee in the
municipality). Later in the process an inspection plan is established where accessibility of the building
is one criterion among many others. The developer is responsible for the inspection plan and the
inspections but the local building committee has to approve the plan and can decide that the
accessibility inspection must to be done by an independent expert.
If the Building Committee establishes a reasonable cause to assume that there has been a violation
of this Building Act or any provision or decision rendered in pursuance of this Act, the Committee
shall raise the question of sanctions. The Building Committee mayprohibit the continuation of a
specific building or may direct an injunction in order to implement the measure within a specified
period.
In May 2011 there will be some changes in the Building and Planning Act. Most important from an
accessibility aspect is that an assessment of the accessibility and usability of a building for people
with impaired mobility or orientation should to be made by the Building Committee already in
connection with the building permit. The regulations concerning inspections of construction work
are to be strengthened by clarifying the required contents of inspection plans and the tasks and skills
required of the inspection supervisor.
In the education for architects, accessibility is most often integrated, not a special course (maybe
there are one or two days lectures about accessibility) but it doesn´t function very well. There have
been some project trying to improve the educations for architects and designers, but there are still
problems. The schools decide themselves how the education is planned.
There are a few short courses about accessibility at one University. There are also privately organized
short courses.
Since a few months it is possible get a certification as an independent accessibility expert.
There used to be a special education in accessibility available only for persons with disability. This
education doesn´t exist anymore but the persons who attended the course are working as
accessibility consultants. That means that there is expertise in accessibility available.
Sweden has signed and ratified the UN Convention. The Swedish Agency for Disability Policy Co-
ordination has got the commission by the Government to develop methods for monitoring the
Convention and to support local authorities to implement the convention. A national action plan for
accessibility came 2000 and will last to the end of 2010. The Government will form a strategy for the
work with accessibility for the period 2011-2015.
There is proposed a new provision on prohibiting discrimination in the form of inadequate
accessibility for people with disabilities. The provision covers situations in which a person is
disadvantaged through failure to take reasonable accessibility measures to put people with
disabilities in a situation comparable to that of people without such disabilities.
Accessibility are supposed to be integrated in the design of the building and therefore financed in the
same way as the building as a whole. Also when accessibility improvements are done in existing
buildings, they should be finances as other improvements of the buildings. Special funds for
accessibility are considered to lead to that accessibility is regarded as something “special”, not
something that always have to be considered.
- 279 -
But in spite of this, there are some possibilities to get subsidies: A person with disability has
possibility to get subsidy for individual adaption of the dwelling. There are also some subsidies for
some types of assembly halls, nongovernmental premises for cultural activities and dwellings for
elderly people.
Competitions for architect to design homes for old people are planned to take place next year.
A weak point is the system for supervision and inspection. For example the inspection is made quite
late in the process and sanctions are seldom used. The system with the developer as responsible for
the inspection might not always function very well. The system has been discussed and some
improvements have been decided. It is too early to say if the changes that have been decided will be
enough to get a well functioning system. To great extent it is also dependent on the role of the
Building Committees in the municipalities and if they use the possibilities they have to influence the
control process.
Another weak point in the lack of knowledge about accessibility within the building sector.
G.2.27 United Kingdom

Rapporteur/Informant: Professor Keith Bright [info.kbc@btinternet.com]
In the UK, legislation was first introduced in 1970 which required the needs of disabled people to be
taken into account in the provision of public buildings. Two British Standards were introduced in
1978 and 1979, which evolved through various stages into BS8300:2009.
The introduction of the national anti-discrimination legislation such as the Disability Discrimination
Act 1995 (DDA), subsequent amendments and extensions to it in 2001, 2004 and 2005 and the new
Equality Act 2010 was the responsibility of the UK government. This legislation covers the whole of
the UK (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales).
Responsibility for its implementation and ensuring that discrimination does not occur however, falls
on the providers of goods, facilities and services (whether for profit or not), and on those providing
employment or educational opportunities, and transport providers.
Building Regulations are issued by the Government and administered by individual Local Authorities
(LA), through a Building Control Officer (BCO), or by a private Approved Inspector (AI). Issues of
accessibility at Planning are the responsibility of the relevant Planning Authority. England and Wales
have one system for building control although there are different systems of creating and
administering building control and planning in Scotland and Northern Ireland, and for Planning in
Wales.
PartM_ADMBuilding Regulations were first introduced in 1985 as ‘Part T’ which became Part M in
1987. Part M has subsequently been updated in 1991, 1999 and 2004. The 2004 version dropped the
terminology ‘disabled people’ from its title and the document now represents a Regulation for
inclusive design rather than designing for ‘special needs’. Part M is relevant to England and Wales,
Scotland has guidance on accessibility contained within technical documents for Domestic and Non-
domestic buildings. Accessibility issues in Northern Ireland are covered by Part R of the Northern
Ireland Regulations.
Building Regulations represent the minimum mandatory legal standard of accessibility, BS 8300 and
other British Standards represent latest good practice guidance, but adopting their
recommendations is not mandatory(unless referred to by Part M). The DDA required reasonableness
in all the circumstances of a particular case, and that may well be judged as being more than what is
‘required’ from building regulations.
Since the 1st October 2010 discrimination against particular identified groups in the UK, including
disabled people, is covered by the Equality Act 2010. Some elements related to the duties of public
- 280 -
bodies and organisations operating in the public sector will come into force in 2011. The Disability
Discrimination Acts and other discrimination legislation related to, for example, race, gender, and
religion have been subsumed into the Equality Act, 2010. Whilst there are no explicit requirements
relating to the built environment in the Equality Act, it requires service providers, employers, and
educators not to discriminate in the work they do or the services and opportunities they offer. That
discrimination can result either by the attitudes, procedures and policies they adopt and/or in the
built environments they operate in. Therefore whilst there is not an explicit requirement in the
Equality Act relating to accessibility to the built environment there is an implicit one to consider the
provision of the built environment and ensure it does not cause or contribute to discrimination.
The Equality Act refers to the Building Regulations Part M as an indicator of the minimum mandatory
specification for accessibility of new buildings and those undergoing major refurbishments.
Building Regulations are developed by Government with input from many bodies in the public and
private sectors. The responsibility for compliance with the Building Regulations rests with the
relevant LA. Developers and design teams may engage the services of an AI to oversee compliance
with the Regulations rather than using the services of the LA BCO.
LAs also employ Access Officers to offer advice to developers and to manage the consideration of
accessibility issues during the consideration of planning and building control applications. Access
Officers will also be part of an Access Group, which are volunteer groups of local disabled people
who comment on most major planning applications.
Building Regulations only apply to existing buildings if they are subject to major refurbishments.
Small changes do not trigger the need for Building Regulation approval.
Planning Permission may be granted subject to certain conditions relating to accessibility but these
are separate from those required by Building Regulations.
For all buildings works where the Buildings Regulations apply, the standard laid down is identical for
new or works to existing buildings. However, there is a case for requiring what is reasonably
achievable in all situations, and this may bring about more compromise for changes to existing
buildings. The goal is achieving the overall aim of accessibility and inclusion rather than simply
following prescriptive requirements.
Planning
It is mandatory for all applications for planning permission in the UK (outline and full) to be
accompanied by a Design and Access Statement (DAS). An application that is not accompanied by a
DAS mustnot be considered by the planning authority.
The design component of a DAS will cover issues such as the size and scale of the proposal, how it fits
within the context of the site and the areas and its appearance. The access component will identify
vehicular and transport impacts for the proposal and how the principles of inclusive design have
influenced and informed the design process.
The DAS must also identify what consultation has been undertaken to ensure the proposal is both
accessible and inclusive, who has been involved in the consultation and professional expertise in
terms of accessibility and inclusion of those preparing and submitting the application. The DAS must
also demonstrate that the needs of all those who will use the proposed development have been and
are being considered regardless of their age, disability, ethnicity or social grouping.
In England and Wales, Part M, which is the Regulation, is accompanied by the Approved Document to
Part M, which offers guidance on one way the Regulation may be met.
In Scotland it is Technical Regulations relating to domestic and non-domestic buildings and in
Northern Ireland it is Part R.
- 281 -
All the Regulations allow for different design solutions and ADM 2004 introduces the concept of the
Access Statement by which designers can demonstrate that their proposals meet the Regulation
even if they do not precisely follow the guidance in the Approved Document.
The standards identified in UK Regulations and Standards are in line with, and in most places exceed,
the functional requirements of CEN/CENELEC Guide 6.
Other guidance comes from the British Standards Institute (BSI), Charities and organisations
representing disabled people, individual Governments departments, transport companies (road, rail,
air and waterways), independent and government funded organisations.
Some of these guidance documents are produced collaboratively and some by individual
organisations or relating to specific user needs requirements (i.e. vision, hearing, ageing, learning
disabilities, mental health etc). Inclusive design guidance is also produced by professional bodies
such as the RIBA as is educational materials for the teaching of Inclusive Design in primary and
secondary schools.
Local Authorities and Building Control organisations also produce accessibility and inclusive design
guidance.
All new building works must comply with the Building Regulations and for certain types of buildings
other requirements also apply. For education buildings there are Building Bulletins which must be
adhered to and for Health Buildings there are Health Building notes that also lay down good practice
requirements.
All new buildings now have a much greater level of general accessibility than previously. Wherever
possible, developers are encouraged to go beyond the minimum mandatory standard laid down in
Regulations and to follow the more comprehensive guidance in BS8300.
The introduction of the DDA in 1995 focussed the mind of those offering services, educational or
employment opportunities of the need to look beyond simply meeting Regulations to also address
the anti-discrimination duties placed on them by the DDA. The DDA also encouraged improved levels
of accessibility in existing buildings to meet the anti-discrimination obligations imposed by the Act.
This task is now taken up by the Equality Act 2010.
In the UK, the DDA and its successor, the Equality Act 2010, are pieces of anti-discrimination
legislation which relate to people and the opportunities and services available to them. The emphasis
is therefore on preventing discrimination rather than one of simply requiring the built environment
to be accessible.
The Equality Act does not lay down any performance-based requirements and does not offer any
advice on technical issues or specifications. Therefore it is not possible to describe a building or
product as being ‘Equality Act Compliant’. It is in the actual delivery of services and opportunities to
people that the existence of any discrimination is judged, and the physical provision of an
environment may be only one factor in making that decision.
All new buildings must meet the minimum requirements of the Building Regulations and CAS
operates mainly through the building control process. However, whilst Regulations offer guidance on
physical provision they does not consider the 'softer' management and policy issues often also
associated with ensuring discrimination does not occur.
For existing buildings, unless building work is being undertaken complying with Building Regulations
is not required or applicable It is for the provider of the employment or educational opportunity or
the provider of the service to undertake any CAS to ensure that any contribution to discrimination
caused by an inaccessible built environment is identified and, if necessary, removed. That may be
- 282 -
discrimination caused by the physical features of an environment or by the policies and procedures
adopted by those using it to offer the service or opportunity.
The ultimate test of whether discrimination has occurred, and if that discrimination is unreasonable,
will be decided through legal action in the courts instigated by the person who feels they have been
discriminated against. In such an assessment process the benchmarks against which reasonableness
in terms of the provision of the built environment will be judged is likely to be the good practice
guidance contained in British Standard BS8300:2009 rather than the minimum standard contained in
the Building Regulations.
Through the mandatory requirement for ‘Design and Access Statements’ to be submitted with
applications for planning permission, CAS form an important part of the planning permission process.
There is no CAS in the post-occupancy evaluation stage but there are clear duties imposed by the
Equality Act to ensure discrimination does not occur in the activities taking place in the building. This
is an on-going and evolving duty.
The UK National Register of Access Consultants (NRAC) is an independent professional body of Access
Consultant that was set up in 1999. Members of the NRAC come from various built environment and
health related backgrounds and include architects, open space and landscape designers, surveyors,
interior designers, occupational therapists, fire consultants and transport designers. They also
comprise both disabled and non-disabled people. Consultants work with a variety of building types
and environments including public spaces, commercial, health, educational, transport, retail and
banking and housing.
Membership of the NRAC is attained through a peer review process comprising a review of a
submitted piece of work and a professional interview with experienced members of the NRAC.
All NRAC members must agree to undertake a programme of appropriate Continuing Professional
Development and must provide evidence of their CPD activities annually before their membership is
renewed. All members of the NRAC must carry on-going professional indemnity insurance, evidence
of which is also a requirement for annual membership renewal.
The status of the NRAC has grown significantly over the past ten years and there is a growing
tendency for private and public sector companies, mainly as part of their conformity assessment
process, to specify the involvement by an NRAC member as requirement in their procurement and
award process.
There is very little formal training on Inclusive Design undertaken in architectural courses throughout
the UK. Where it is provided it is often seen as a bolt-on topic rather than a philosophy or threads
that affects the whole development and in-use phases of a project. This is improving – but slowly.
The Royal Institution of British Architects (RIBA) has an Inclusive Design Committee to promote the
ID agenda and improve the delivery of inclusive design in education courses.
Other bodies promoting ID include the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) and the
National Register of Access Consultants (NRAC)
The UK also has several post-graduate and diploma courses specialising in inclusive design and
accessibility that are open to people from many professions including architecture, health,
construction, transport, planning, interior design, and surveying.
Under the DDA 2005 there was a duty placed on all bodies operating in the public sector to develop
disability equality schemes to show how they will eliminate discrimination and how they will actively
promote the inclusion of disabled people in the work they undertake.
- 283 -
The Equality Act 2010 takes on this role and the need for action plans to be developed to identify
how discrimination based on age, gender, disability, ethnicity, religious beliefs, and sexual
orientation will be eliminated.
Funding is not usually available for new privately developed housing or work to existing housing
except for situations where improvements may be needed to meet an individual set of needs (for
example if a person becomes disabled and alterations are needed to their house).
The duties imposed by the Equality Act encourages those using existing buildings to consider and
improve accessibility, any work for which is not covered out of public funds (unless it affects publicly
owned buildings).
Good practice points in the UK include the concept of the Design and Access Statement at Planning
which requires developers to consider accessibility and inclusion at the earliest stages of any project.
The opportunity for designers to use an Access Statement as part of their building regulations
application to justify the accessibility and inclusion credentials of their proposals, even if they do not
match precisely the guidance accompanying the Regulation is also an excellent safeguard for design
freedom and creativity.
The introduction of Inclusive Design education at primary and secondary school levels is also a major
and positive step in informing the designers of the future.
Weak points are the lack of cohesion between Building Control and Planning, which seen as separate
activities and which are undertaken in most cases by different departments. This often results in little
or effective communication between the departments issuing approvals or permissions, although
this is to some extent being addressed by Access Officers engaged within individual local authorities.
The most important starting point for the UK would be in tackling the Building Control/Planning
divide.
G.3 EFTA countries
G.3.1 Liechtenstein
G.3.2 Norway
Rapporteur/Informant: Rudolph Brynn [rbr@standard.no]
History (- development concerning legislation on accessibility for people with disabilities and others).
The Technical Regulations to the Planning and Building Act have had clauses on accessibility since the
1970s. But the revised regulations to the Act entering into force on July 1 st 2010 have extensive
clauses detailing requirements for universal design of the built environment.
The Norwegian Public Procurement Act of January 1st 2007 requires public procurers to include
universal design in the planning phase of procurements, and in the technical annex to public tenders
to specify how universal design is to be incorporated in relevant tenders.
The Discrimination and Accessibility Act of January 1st 2009 requires new buildings and adjoining
outdoor areas to be universally designed. In addition, certain categories of existing buildings are to
have universal design when renovated, for instance schools.
Authorities responsible for legislation on accessibility in the built environment
The Ministry for Local Government and Regional Development
(http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/krd.html?id=504) is responsible for legislation regarding
- 284 -
accessibility in the built environment. The Ministry for Children, Equality and Social Inclusion
(http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/bld.html?id=298) has the overall responsibility for Norwegian
antidiscrimination legislation and for universal design policy. Cases regarding violation of disabled
people’s rights, including lack of accessibility, are referred to the Equality and Antidiscrimination
Ombud (http://www.ldo.no/en/) , who decide whether or not cases are to be taken to court.
The implementation of the legislation will take time. However the new regulations has already
introduced new accessibility solutions in building projects and raised much awareness in the
professional environments like entrepreneurs and designers. There is also a great demand for the
new Norwegian standard NS 11001-1/2 on universal design of the built environment as a guideline.
Another important result of the legislation is its requirement for activity planning and reporting from
public authorities on national, regional and local levels, having resulted in a great number of
specialised guidelines and handbooks as well as action plans.
The Government has expressed a wish to improve accessibility of existing building according to a/o
importance of daily use of public buildings, like schools, libraries etc. Universal design of existing
buildings is not required by the Discrimination and Accessibility Act but funding is allocated to ensure
universal design of existing buildings during major overhauls/rebuilding projects etc. financed a/o
from the Government Action Plan on Universal Design (Norway Universally Designed by 2025).
In 2009 Standards Norway published NS 11001 Universal design of building works,
Part 1 Buildings open to the public and
Part 2 Housing.
In addition there are the following national standards:
NS 8175 Sound conditions in buildings - Sound classes for various types of buildings;
prNS 11005 Universal design of developed outdoor areas;
NS 11010:2008 Accessible tourist destinations - Requirements as basis for a labelling system;
NS 3041:2007 Information signs - Rules for details and location.
These standards are in line with CEN/CLC Guide 6 (ISO/IEC Guide 71 has also been translated into
Norwegian and a checklist for national standardization committees developed for how to incorporate
Guide 71/6 into their work where relevant).
Accessibility design guidelines?
The Technical regulation to the Planning and Building Act contains specific guidelines on how to
ensure universal design of the built environment.
Several counties and municipalities, like Trondheim have developed their own guidelines on universal
design of buildings and outdoor areas. This is also relevant regarding handbooks developed transport
bodies, concerning infrastructure construction.
Organisations of disabled people, like the Norwegian Blind Union and the Norwegian Association of
Disabled people produce their own guidelines focusing on making accessible buildings for their
particular target groups.
There are several co-operation structures between public authorities and NGOs. On highest political
level a committee of state secretaries have regular meetings with the NGO representatives of
disabled people. There are councils of disability affairs on national, regional and local levels bringing
- 285 -
together public administration, NGOs and politicians dealing with all issues affecting disabled people,
commenting public policies, building projects (local level) and providing position papers on relevant
issues.
Bodies that are checking conformity with legislation (public and others).
The applicants for building projects are responsible for including documentation of conformity with
legal requirements for universal design. This is checked by the appropriate planning and building
authorities (local, regional, governmental) according to the regulations.
This is part of the general public procurement procedure regulated by the Public Procurement Act of
2007, requiring incorporation of universal design in the planning of tenders and in the technical
specifications. The legislation is the national transposition of the EU Public Procurement directive but
has made universal design an obligatory part of the public procurement process. This must also be
seen in relation to the Discrimination and Accessibility Act of 2009 and the Technical Regulations of
2010 to the Planning and Building Act all of which make clear requirements to universal design being
an obligatory aspect of procurement of new buildings.
New building projects with work places, offices, shops etc. are in general now accessible in Norway.
In particular the main entrances and public spaces of such buildings, because of the raised awareness
following from the new legislation, and because of the obligation of public bodies and private
companies whose enterprise “is of public interest” to follow actively the principle of universal design.
However, still a lot of new solutions are produced which are unsatisfactory, lack of information of
universal design is widespread. Only 1 % of the built environment consists ofnew buildings, of
existing buildings a lot remains to be done to improve accessibility, in particular in the private sector.
A builder has to provide documentation that universal design is incorporated in the design of a new
building, together with other requirements as to the Technical Regulations of the Planning and
Building act. When applying for a new project to the building authorities they are to control that the
design and plan is according to the requirements specified in the Regulation.
Planning and building authorities on different administrative levels are responsible for controlling
that plans are conforming with the requirements for universal design.
This is quite a new field in education of architects and engineers and still mostly a voluntary subject
as part of mainstream education. There are special courses being held in many higher education
facilities but work still remains to make universal design an integrated part of mainstream
architecture and engineering education. Expertise is available from many different expert bodies and
companies specializing in universal design are established, like the Government centre of excellence
in accessibility and universal design Deltasenteret
(http://www.helsedirektoratet.no/deltasenteret/english/) and the private company Universell
Utforming AS (http://www.universellutforming.org/).
In Norway Government Action Plans for disabled people, including accessibility measures, have been
in operation since 1981. The current action plan is called “Norway Universally Designed by 2025” and
covers the period 2009-2013.
(http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/bld/tema/nedsatt_funksjonsevne/norge-universelt-utformet-
2025.html?id=561345)
There are also governmental action plans in the field of universal design of transport
(http://www.ntp.dep.no/2010-2019/index_10_19.html) (including infrastructure) as well as a vast
range of regional and local action plans for accessibility.
- 286 -
New action plans, policies?

There are many initiatives in the form of action plans at all administrative levels as well as in larger
public enterprises, including universal design in the built environment, public transport, outdoor
areas, ICT, education etc. Universal design is included in the present Government’s Declaration of
policy and is one of the main priorities of public transport policy in Norway as decided by the
Parliament.
The above mentioned action plans are regularly reviewed by independent bodies and revised
according to responses by for instance NGOs and expert bodies. From 2011 new Regulations on
universal design of ICT will be implemented to the Discrimination and Accessibility Act, and this will
include regulations for ICT embedded in the built environment.
The Norwegian State Housing Bank provides funding for universal design of housing and is indeed
one of the public bodies supporting universal design in Norway:
(http://www.husbanken.no/Venstremeny/en_universaldesign.aspx)
Funds for existing buildings can be requested from the Norwegian State Housing Bank and from the
regional Assistive Technology Centres which assist disabled people to improve housing when needed.
This is paid for by the Government as a “loan” to the individuals for the duration of their impairment
necessitating special measures.
The Ministry for Children, Equality and Social Inclusion has introduced an Award for Universal Design
of New Buildings from 2009, and several public bodies like the Norwegian Directorate for Nature
Management (http://english.dirnat.no/) have awards for examples of good practice in the field of
universal design.
The award Statens byggeskikkpris (Governmental Award for Best Practice in the field of building) is
given to building projects emphasizing universal design and sustainable built environment
(http://www.husbanken.no/Venstremeny/Byggeskikk/Statens%20Byggeskikkpris/pris.aspx ).
The annual award of approximately € 25 000 is managed by The Ministry for Local Government and
Regional Development and secretariat for the jury is the State Housing Bank.
The Government public buildings authority, Statsbygg, is managing the Government properties in
Norway and abroad and has universal design as one of its focusing areas
(http://www.statsbygg.no/System/Topp-menyvalg/English/). This concerns upgrading existing public
property and ensuring universal design of new projects (124 projects in 2006). They have developed
BIM (building information module) technology to assess level of universal design in their properties.
Statsbygg also have projects regarding universal design of outdoor areas.
There is a special public website with the latest news on universal design projects and examples of
good practice managed by the Ministry for Children, Equality and Social Inclusion:
http://www.universell-utforming.miljo.no/.
16 municipalities have for some years been trailblazing areas for local initiatives on universal design
with publicly financed projects to improve accessibility. http://www.universell-
utforming.miljo.no/pilotfylkene/948-pilotkommuner-for-universell-utforming.
Each year several projects are given awards for good practice in universal design, for instance the
2010 Governmental Award for Best Practice in the field of building was given to a local school
building in the municipality of Gjerdrum for excellence in new thinking about an integrative public
building:
http://www.husbanken.no/Venstremeny/Byggeskikk/Statens%20Byggeskikkpris/Vinnere2010.aspx.
- 287 -

There is a need for more information in the field of universal design, and adequate funding for
awareness raising projects. There is a need to have more initiatives on mainstreaming universal
design into education of architects and designers. There are also a lot of efforts necessary to improve
existing built environment.
Most important starting points for improvement
More awareness raising among architects and engineers about the possibilities for innovation arising
from the legally based requirements is necessary. Some articles are already highlighting this in
Norwegian media (e.g. http://www.universell-utforming.miljo.no/tema/generelt/1033--uu-krav-
tvinger-fram-ny-arkitektur
Another important measure is to strengthen education on universal design as part of mainstream
education curricula. It is important to focus on the societal gains to be had from accessibility to
buildings for increasing employment among disabled people, better access to transport, education
and societal participation in general.
Activities to improve the existing building stock according
This is part of the above mentioned action plans, awards and political initiative on multiple levels. An
interesting feature is the Ministry for Environment’s Action Plan on environmental policy from 2009,
linking sustainable development to universal design. Buildings designed according to the universal
design regulations will require less restructuring and thereby reducing the danger of harmful
emissions resulting from rebuilding during the buildings’ lifespan.
G.3.3 Switzerland
Rapporteur/Informant: Joe Manser [manser@hindernisfrei-bauen.ch]
The most important regulation in Switzerland for accessible built environment is since 2004 the Equal
Right Legislation for People with Disabilities (BehiG). This law requires non-discrimination within
buildings open to the public, public buildings, buildings with more than 50 working places, apartment
buildings with more than 8 units and access to the public transport. These functional requirements
have to be fulfilled with all new buildings as well as renovation projects. For buildings already existing
there is a regulation for adaptations. Adaptations are reasonable if they cost less than 20 percent of
the renovation costs or less than 5 percent of the buildings worth. All individual people with a
disability as well as the national umbrella organisation have the right to complain the building
projects if they are not accessible. Further detailed functional and technical requirements are
regulated in the 26th cantonal building codes and building regulations. For the public transport exists
a functional and technical regulation on national level.
Building regulation lies in the competence of the 26 cantons. But today most of them have a
regulation for accessibly built environment that conforms to the national equality law.
Nearly all of the cantonal regulations refer to the technical standard SIA500 Obstacle Free Buildings.
This means that today the standard SIA500 is uniformly accepted for all technical requirements for
accessible building.
For the outdoor environment exist similar standards (VSS) which fulfil the same purpose.
---
- 288 -

Public procurements don’t influence the process of accessible building. This is because of the fact
that all public buildings have to be accessible based on national and cantonal laws and building
codes.
Today only few building authorities in cantons and communities work with conformance schemes.
Where conformance schemes are in use they vary from simple to complex forms.
The education and training in accessibility differs a lot within the approximately 20 schools for
architects and engineers. Most of the schools only have a minimum of one or two lessons on
accessibility per year.
Switzerland has not yet signed the UN Convention but most of what is required in the UN Convention
for the field of built environment is already being implemented in Switzerland.
Many cantons and communities have programs available to remove barriers in existing buildings. The
available funds are mostly quite limited.
---
G.4 International countries
G.4.1 USA
Rapporteur/Informant: Peter Connell [Peter.Connell@arup.com]
There are a number of disability rights laws in existence within the USA. The most important of these
with regard to accessibility is the Americans with Disabilities Act.
On July 26, 1990, President George Bush signed into law the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
This significant legislation extends civil rights to an estimated 43 million Americans with disabilities in
much the same way that individuals are protected on the basis of race, colour, sex, national origin
and religion. The ADA makes it illegal to discriminate on the basis of disability in the areas of
employment, public services, public accommodations, transportation and telecommunications. The
ADA was later updated in 2008 with changes effective 1st January 2009, a further revision was
published in the Federal Register on 15th September 2010, which will take effect on 15th March
2011.
People with disabilities can no longer be denied employment just because they are disabled. In
addition, the ADA requires that restaurants, movie theatres, libraries, doctors’ offices, parks and
millions of other public accommodations be accessible to people with disabilities. The services
provided by state and local governments must also conform to ADA requirements.
The ADA applies to all people with physical or mental impairments that substantially limit one or
more major life activities. Such activities include walking, talking, hearing, seeing, breathing, learning,
performing manual tasks and caring for oneself. Other kinds of major life activities contained in the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s Interpretive Guidelines include sitting, standing, lifting,
and reaching. The law also applies to individuals who have a history of such impairment, as well as
those who are perceived as having such impairment.
- 289 -
Attached to the ADA are the 1991 ADA Standards for Accessible Design, (28 CFR Part 36, revised July
1, 1994) issued by the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice have announced that the
2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design must be used on and after 15th March 2012, which will be
released soon. These guidelines are to be applied during the design, construction, and alteration of
such buildings and facilities to the extent required by regulations issued by Federal agencies,
including the Department of Justice, under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
The Department of Justice is responsible for enforcing the ADA.
Through lawsuits and both formal and informal settlement agreements, the Department has
achieved greater access for individuals with disabilities in hundreds of cases. Under general rules
governing lawsuits brought by the Federal Government, the Department of Justice may not file a
lawsuit unless it has first unsuccessfully attempted to settle the dispute through negotiations
The Department may file lawsuits in Federal court to enforce the ADA and may obtain court orders
including compensatory damages and back pay to remedy discrimination. Under title III the
Department may also obtain civil penalties of up to $55,000 for the first violation and $110,000 for
any subsequent violation.
The Department sometimes resolves cases without filing a lawsuit by means of formal written
settlement agreements or in some instances, the public accommodation, commercial facility, or State
or local government promptly agrees to take the necessary actions to achieve compliance. In others,
extensive negotiations are required.
The Department of Justice operates a free ADA Information Line to provide information and
publications to the public about the requirements of the ADA. A 24 hour automated service, which
allows callers to order publications, ask about filing a complaint or speak to specialists regarding
technical questions (latter facility only available at specific times).
The construction or alteration of any freestanding structure over 10m2 (108sq.ft.) in area is required
to have a Building Permit. A building permit is a licence that is required prior to construction to
ensure that the design meets with the standards set out in a particular state. It gives building officials
the means to enforce the requirements of the standards.
others have their own standards for accessibility. These standards are enforced by the state or local
city or town authority. Accessibility is reviewed and approved at the same time as other aspects of
the design i.e. when the project is submitted for a building permit and during the construction
process. There is no requirement for a separate report to be submitted with regard to access at any
stage.
Plan Reviewer
The building plan reviewer, or examiner, reviews and inspects engineering and architectural drawings
when a project is still in the design phase. They function as a form of quality control by double-
checking calculations and verifying compliance with building codes. If plans are not code compliant
the plan reviewer must work with the design team (i.e. architects and engineers) to develop
solutions that are effective and follow the building codes. The plan reviewer interprets codes if their
application is unclear.
- 290 -
Building Inspector
Building inspectors examine all aspects of a building's construction to verify conformance with
applicable building codes. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, "inspectors make an initial
inspection during the first phase of construction and follow up with further inspections throughout
the construction project."
Building inspectors in some municipalities must perform periodic checks on buildings to verify
continuing code compliance. These checks can be on certain building systems, such as elevators, or
for whole public buildings suchas schools or entertainment venues.
others have their own standards.
The USA is not within Europe and therefore the CEN/CLC Guide 6 is not applicable. CEN7CLC Guide 6
is identical with ISO/IEC Guide 71 and therefore also relevant in USA.
others have their own standards. The Department of Justice provides education and technical
assistance through a variety of means. Activities include providing direct technical assistance and
guidance to the public through the ADA Website and the ADA Information Line; developing and
disseminating technical assistance materials to the public; and undertaking outreach initiatives.
ADA requirements may change as regulations are modified to improve access or to provide more
detailed guidance for entities covered by the ADA. When new requirements are proposed, a formal
procedure is used which calls for public comment and agency review before the requirement is
finalized. Changes in existing requirements or new requirements are first issued as a proposed rule
and published in the Federal Register. Public comments, which are received by mail and over the
Internet, are reviewed by the Department before a proposed Final Rule is published.
All new buildings must meet the minimum requirements of the State’s standards and CAS operates
mainly through the building inspection process. However, whilst standards offer guidance on physical
provision they do not consider the policies and procedures adopted by the service provider to ensure
discrimination doesn’t occur.
---
Tax credits are available for small businesses thatremove access barriers from their facilities, provide
accessible services or take other steps to improve accessibility for customers with disabilities.
- 291 -
Tax deductions are available for businesses of all sizes that remove access barriers in their facilities or
vehicles.
A business that annually incurs eligible expenses to bring itself into compliance with the ADA may use
these tax incentives every year. The incentives may be applied to a variety of expenditures; however,
they may not be applied to the costs of new construction. All barrier removal must comply with
applicable Federal accessibility standards.
Accessibility is considered at the same time as other aspects of the design throughout the design and
construction process. If any accessibility issues are missed during this process then anyone feeling
they have been discriminated against would have to complain through the Department of Justice.
Using this process may prove costly and time consuming.
One good point is the use of incentives, with tax credits and tax deductions available businesses to
encourage them to achieve accessibility.
G.4.2 Canada
Betty Dion Betty Dion [bdion@magma.ca]
Bob Topping [bob.topping@designable.net]
Human rights legislation guarantees freedom from discrimination thereby establishing accessibility as
a right.
At the National/Federal level
The Canadian Human Rights Act establishes the high level accessibility principles for sectors
regulated by the Federal government (Defence, inter-provincial transportation, banking, federal
government facilities and services, telecommunications, etc.). The Act is available at
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/h-6/243963.html
The National Building Code (NBC) is the primary source of accessibility requirements for new
construction and alteration to existing buildings. The 2010 Code is available for purchase at
http://www.nationalcodes.ca/eng/national_codes_home.shtml. It should be noted that the NBC is a
model Code only. Provincial codes have the jurisdiction. Some provinces adopt the National Building
Code of Canada but the larger provinces have their own Building Codes.
The National Transportation Sector (as against the Provincial Transportation Sectors), are regulated
by a series of Acts. A list of the transportation related Acts can be found at
http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/acts-regulations/menu.htm
Industry Canada has developed an Accessible Procurement Toolkit which can be accessed at
http://www.apt.gc.ca/. The Government of Canada’s Public Procurement policies and process can be
viewed at http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/ga-sm/chapitre01-chapter01-eng.html
In addition, the Canadian Standards Association developed a suite of accessibility Standards under
the B651 identifier including Standards for the built environment, banking machines, interactive self-
service devices and point-of-sales terminals. There is also a CSA standard on Inclusive Design for an
ageing population - CAN/CSA B659-08 – however this particular Standard is quite generic and lacking
in specifics. The Government of Canada has adopted CAN/CSA B651-09 as a standard for accessibility
for all of its facilities.
At the Provincial/Territory Level (10 Provinces and 3 Territories)
Each Province/Territory has its own Human Rights Code – establishing accessibility principles for
sectors regulated by the Provincial government (Transportation within provinces, land use, building
- 292 -
development, employment, etc.) For example: the Ontario Human Rights Code can be accessed at
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90h19_e.htm.
Provinces and Territories either adopt the National Building Code or incorporate sections of the NBC
into their own Provincial building codes. Accessibility provisions within the various Provincial Building
Codes are not harmonised – there are many variations and inconsistencies. The British Columbia
Building Code is considered to be one of the more progressive.
See http://www.bccodes.ca/bccode_building.htm
The Province of Ontario is the first in Canada to develop an Accessibility Act – the Accessibility for
Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA).
See http://www.mcss.gov.on.ca/en/mcss/programs/accessibility/index.aspx. This Act regulates
accessibility for companies offering goods, service and facilities to persons in Ontario. Regulations
are being developed and are in the process of being implemented in the following areas:
Customer Service (enacted)
Information and Communication (likely to be enacted by mid 2011)
Transportation (likely to be enacted by mid 2011)
Employment Practices (likely to be enacted by mid 2011)
Built Environment (date of enactment unclear – much controversy)
Procurement at the Provincial level varies across the country. Ontario Example:
http://www.doingbusiness.mgs.gov.on.ca/mbs/psb/psb.nsf/English/procurement.html
At the Municipal Level
While accessibility of the building itself is regulated by Provincial Building Codes, the accessibility of
the exterior site elements (parking, landscape areas, walkways, etc.) are regulated by Municipal
bylaws. Each municipality in Canada has its own bylaws, so they are extremely varied. Some of the
Municipalities who have been progressive with their accessibility programs are London (Ontario),
Winnipeg (Manitoba) and Saanich (British Columbia). A link to Saanich’s Adaptable Housing initiatives
http://www.saanich.ca/business/adaptable/adaptable.html
Many municipalities have developed their own accessibility standards – in direct response to the
inadequate accessibility provisions within the Provincial Building Codes. Some of the most
progressive accessibility standards development work is happening at the municipal level in Canada.
Such municipal standards are typically mandatory for municipally funded project only. Municipalities
have no legislative authority to impose accessibility building standard. At this time, the most
progressive Municipal accessibility standardis Winnipeg. See
http://www.winnipeg.ca/ppd/UD/default.stm (Note there is a 2010 Standard – but it has not yet
been approved for publication).
The Building Codes and municipal bylaws actually control the level of accessibility but human rights
agencies can audit, monitor and require accessibility provisions.
Implemented in CAN-CSA B651 Accessibility of the Built Environment
The province of Ontario has passed the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and has
developed their own standards including one for the Built Environment, one for transportation.
They established deadlines and targets for different agencies such as educational facilities,
businesses, etc.
- 293 -
They also required municipalities to develop, adopt accessibility guidelines. Many have already.
Unfortunately this has created too many documents that are not harmonised.
Municipalities in other provinces have developed guidelines.
The province of British Columbia developed an excellent code 20 years ago and is the leader in
Canada.
The government of Canada has an accessibility requirement built into all their procurements. They
have also developed an Accessibility Procurement Toolkit. We have had this for 15 years or so. The
European accessibility procurement initiate might be modelled on the Canadian program.
The building permit system assesses compliance with accessibility code requirements.
Human rights commissions have the right to conduct conformance assessments and do so
periodically. The Canadian Human Rights Commissions audited samples of federal offices, banks,
bank machines, etc and published reports. They followed up periodically. The Ontario Human Rights
Commission did the same but other provinces have not been so active.
At the municipal level, many municipalities are asking their architects and other designers to
complete a compliance checklist, and ‘sign-off’ that everything has been done.
A number of schools of architecture include courses on universal design – probably about 10 schools.
But it could be questioned if the schools of architecture and professional development programs
really are embracing accessibility or universal design in any meaningful way. There are some
exceptions for example OCAD University in Toronto, and some of the community colleges programs
who are training architectural technologists. There are likely isolated examples in other Provinces.
Engineers – not much that I am aware of.
Canada has signed the convention and is currently negotiating and conferring with the provinces. In
reality, there is no news on this lately. But there is an upcoming study planned on the potential
implications to the National Building Code of Canadarelated to Canada signing the UN Convention.
There is a Federal EnAbling Access program, as well as similar Provincial programs. The Federal
program provides funding for accessibility renovations. For example the Ontario Provincial program
funds education and awareness initiatives for capacity building in advance of the enactment of the
AODA regulations.
We have a problem with the lack of harmonization of accessibility as new documents continue to be
introduced by municipalities. However, this has come about because of the history of weak
regulation at both the federal and provincial levels.
The accessibility Act which is evolving in Ontario is the first serious attempt to enhance accessibility
obligations anywhere in Canada. The Regulations when (and if) enacted will provide enhanced
accessibility to goods, services and facilities across all sectors. The Province of Manitoba is soon to
release a similar Act, and other Province and Territories are watching the Ontario experiment very
carefully.
G.4.3 Singapore
- 294 -
G.4.4 South Africa

The framework guiding the implementation of environmental access legislation is the United Nations
Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities. South Africa (SA) signed this in full, including the
optional protocol, which several countries opted out of) in 2007.
South Africa’s Constitution commits the country to equality, human dignity and a safe environment.
Although this was written before South Africa signed the UN Convention, there is nothing conflicting
between the two documents.
The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 2000 (PEPUDA 2000) defines
equality for people with disabilities in relation to the Constitution. It makes direct reference to the
implementation of standards on environmental access published by the South African Bureau of
Standards (SABS).
The PEPUDA 2000 applies to any situation where people with disabilities may have experienced
discrimination, including when using buildings and environments.
The main Regulations are included in the Building Regulations and Standards Act 1977, which was
amended in 2008. The SABS publishes ‘Deemed to Satisfy Rules’ or standards to accompany the
Regulations.
Part S applies to environmental access for people with disabilities and is in the process of being
revised. Standards are currently published as a group of documents and no one part can be revised
without the other, so most are being revised in some way.
Significant changes are being proposed for the new Part S and they represent a substantial shift from
the existing standards which were published in 1990.
Currently there is no clear relationship between legislation and the implementation of accessibility in
practice in some situations although this varies nationally.
SABS issues guidance in the South African National Standards (SANS) 0246-1993 which offers
guidance on meeting the Regulations laid down in Part S. This is currently being updated.
The relationship between Part S and SANS is similar to that between Part M and BS8300 in the UK.
These guidelines follow to some extent the functional requirements of CEN/CENELEC Guide 6
although a closer relationship should be established when the proposed new SANS is issued.
The only major guidance available in SA is the minimum standards that accompany Part S although
there are other documents referred to in Part S including SABS 0246 1993 Accessibility of Buildings.
Although not a recognised or official document in SA, the UK’s BS8300 is also referred to as an
example of good practice guidance.
Other bodies checking compliance and conformity with Regulations include Municipality
departments such as Occupational Health and Safety, Department of Works and Planning/Building
control.
The Regulations and Standards formally apply to all new buildings and major refurbishments,
although they can also act as a guidance standard for existing buildings.
- 295 -
The PEPUDA 2000 has also enhanced the need for those developing environments to be aware of the
inclusivity of their proposals.
Regulations and standards are occasionally considered at the concept stage for large-scale projects.
In the main accessibility tends to be considered at the detailed design stage.
The system of control is inherited from the UK system through past colonial relationships.
Building Control is administered through Local Authorities or ‘Municipalities’. However, these appear
to be often under-resourced and under-staffed. The National Regulator for Compulsory
Specifications (NRCS) has overall responsibility to oversee the building control system, but neither it
nor the municipalities appears to have clear responsibility for particular enforcement.
Legal action under the Building Regulations and Standards is rarely taken and complaints of
discrimination by individuals need to be taken under PEPUDA 2000.
Part A of the Building regulations defines a competent person as a person who can certify a building
being compliant with Part S. However, that person may be an Architect or an engineer with no
qualification of training in environmental access. It is hope that a revision will be made to this by the
introduction of a competent person (environmental access) classification.
Access is taught in some University courses but not as part of a nationally co-ordinated programme.
Training tends to be more related to the needs of people with physical and mobility impairments.
There are some experts nationally, but not many.
No nationally co-ordinated action plan, although there is a framework in place to translate the UN
convention into action.
Little funding is available for improving accessibility in new or existing housing. No awards known.
It is difficult to highlight examples of good practice. However, it is hoped this will change when the
next version of Part S is published. What is needed is a Code of Practice giving clear examples on
what the PEPUDA 2000 means in detail and how to it address in practice.
G.4.5 Australia
Rapporteur/Informant: Murray Mountain {murraylm@bigpond.net.au}
Federal Legislation: Disability Discrimination Act – 1992 (DDA): Claims based, which is very effective
in issues where a person who feels they have been discriminated against can under this legislation
make a claim. Approximately 85% of claims are settled at the conciliation stage. If the matter is taken
to appeal, it is usually to the Federal Court where the majority of appeals are successful in favour of
the claimant. A total success rate of some 96% in claims made under the DDA legislation. The DDA is
administered by the Human Rights Australia Commission (HRAC). The guidelines of the DDA call up
the total suite of AS1428 standards and other related disability access standards in Australia.
State Legislation: Anti-Discrimination and/or Equal Opportunity Legislation: All states within
Australia have Anti-Discrimination and/or Equal Opportunity Legislation, which caters for all types of
discrimination in the work place, sexual, disability in fact all areas where discrimination may take
- 296 -
place. These Acts are reviewed whenever significant changes arise and can be justified.All of the
State legislation is compliance based as opposed to the Federal claims based legislation.
Australian Building Codes Board – This body is responsible for the development of the Building
Code of Australia (BCA), which dictates how all buildings throughout Australia are to be
constructed. It tells you “what you have to do” whilst the standards “tell you how to achieve the
outcome”. We have just recently completed an alignment of the BCA to the DDA legislation
which requires the same level of compliance from the Federal legislative base, the DDA and the
Federal building regulations, the BCA. Over the past 15 years we have been fortunate in
gradually adding building requirements for disability access into the BCA, however the BCA only
catered for the 80th percentile of people with disabilities, whereas the DDA required that the 90th
percentile must be catered for in our built environment.
Local Government Building Regulations – These are the City and Shire Councils, which in addition
to the BCA have their own specific building requirements that in many cases may be unique to
their area. Many of these are additional disability access requirements that go beyond the BCA
requirements. They are referred to as Development Controls Plans (DCPs)
Disability Standards for Accessible Transport - 2002.
This standard requires that all public infrastructure and conveyances are to be fully disability access
compliant by a legislated set target date. Each type of transport infrastructure has differing dates as
per schedule 1 of the standard from 2007 -2032, the majority of which is to be achieved prior to
2017. It is administered by HRAC as part of the DDA legislation.
Design for access & mobility standards – General requirements for access – AS1428
Part 1 – 2009 - New building work. Applies to all new buildings and new building works within a
building, e.g. refurbishments.
Part 2 – 1992 - fixtures, fittings and fitments - Internal.
Part 3 - 1992 - Children and adolescents with physical disabilities.
Part 4.1 – 2009 - Means to assist the orientation of people with vision impairment – Tactile Ground
surface indicators.
Part 4.2 – Wayfinding – currently under development.
Part 5 – 2010 - Hearing Augmentation.
Part 6 – Aged care – to commence development in late 2012.
Part 7 – External access, Urban & non-urban – currently under development.
Part 8 – Adaptable housing – currently being revised (AS4299 - 1995).includes Accessible housing.
Part 9 – Specific types of buildings – to commence development late 2014.
Parking Facilities Standards – AS2890
Part 5 – 2009 - On-street parking – sub section on parking for people with disabilities
Part 6 – 1995 - Off-street parking for people with disabilities.
Lifts – AS1735
Part 7 – 1998 – Stairway Lifts
Part 12 – 1986 - Facilities for people with disabilities
Part 13 – 1986 – Lifts for persons with limited mobility – manually powered.
- 297 -
Part 14 – 1986 – Low rise platforms for passengers

Part 15 – 1986 - Lifts for people with limited mobility –Restricted use – non automatically
controlled.
Part 16 – 1986 – Lifts for people with limited mobility – Restricted use – Automatically
controlled.
Part 17 – 1986 – Lifts for people with limited mobility – Restricted use – Water drive.
Slip resistance classification of new pedestrian surface materials – AS4586 – 1999.
Guide to Road Design – Austroads – Part 6A: Pedestrian and Cyclist Paths – 2009.
Association of Consultants in Access Australia. (ACAA)
State Building Commissions who also play a part in the administering of disability access being
incorporated into the built environment.
Tertiary Education bodies in assisting in the training and education of students who will work in the
area of the built environment.
Australia is a signatory to the UN convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities and related action
plans.
All tenders called for by all 3 levels of Government are required to include all aspects of disability
access in the designs and an access consultant as part of the process is involved throughout the
project. This is a requirement under the Building Code of Australia. As previously mentioned the
DDA legislation is claims based and not compliance based, however government Federal and State
Governments require that it be adhered to.
These are administered by in every case by the Building Surveyors, Certifiers and in many cases
Access consultants. Involvement takes place in many cases on a project from the planning of the
brief. Other projects, access consultants are not brought in until the concept/schematic stages,
which in turn are then approved by the local planning authorities. Each of the following stages,
detailed design, detailed documentation, site inspections throughout the project and final inspection
at practical completion are all certified by building surveyors in every case and in the majority of
cases by access consultants. The latter involvement is voluntary in the privateto have access
consultants approved, but as disability access inclusion in a building or facility is a requirement they
are more often than not involved.
We have a couple of tertiary courses up and running specifically aimed at disability access. These
have only recently been approved. In relation to other professions there are small segments
allocated into most courses, but not nearly enough allocated time is given to have the required input
needed to ensure that the students are equipped to fully understand the issues.
The writer is an accredited Standards Australia trainer and spends many hours each month training
Architects, engineers, urban planners, building surveyors designers, building managers, project
managers and maintenance staff in the area of disability access in the built environment.
As a signatory to the UN convention of Rights of Persons with Disabilities and a major contributor to
the Bill of Rights, Australia is 100% behind all that it stands for.
- 298 -
Our Federal Disability Discrimination Act - 1992 legislation requires that Disability Action Plans (DAPs)
are developed by all organisations, but as this is claims based legislation, many private companies
have not provided and registered DAPs. But when a claim is made against them, this is the trigger
that encourages them to develop a DAP.
Human Rights Australia Commission Access Awards held annually. Nominations of people worthy of
the award due to their contribution in making our community more accessible.
Over 120 local government authorities hold their own access awards for good access design,
innovative projects that benefit people with disabilities during the past year.
Deafness Forum of Australia have 9 categories all of which relate to Captioning in the media,
theatres and community general.
Independence Australia conduct annual “Access Friendly Awards” in conjunction with Department of
human Services – Disability and the Transport Accident Commission to formally recognise the efforts
and achievements of local businesses that demonstrate what we see as the minimum key
components of accessibility, compliant entrances, circulation spaces and unisex accessible WCs.
Access IT awards is relatively new. For the past 3 years have awarded companies or individuals that
have been worthy developers of IT innovative products or solutions that make life easier for people
with disabilities.
It’s been a challenging 32 years since Australia first attempted to change our built environment that
would allow people with disabilities to be able to freely move about in an equitable manner,
independently with dignity.
Current achievements have been the:
general acceptance that people with disabilities have the right to enjoy the freedom of
choice in allthat they do each day and
the legislation and regulations that call up the disability standards to enable all new buildings
and facilities to be accessible.
Areas of improvement are to
expand the education process to all students undertaking courses that relate to the built
environment, and
on-going education of the public as a whole as to te needs of people with disabilities.
- 299 -
G.5 Coverage of User Needs in European and EFTA countries and International (including ISO 21542)
Table G.5.1 - Table of user needs coverage in European and EFTA countries and International (including ISO 21542)
Inter-
EU countries EFTA
national
User Needs
United Kingdom
Czech Republic
(indicated for each country with
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Switzerland
Generally, partly or not covered: G/P/N and indicated
Lithuania
Germany
Denmark
Romania
ISO 2142
CANADA
Portugal
Slovenia
Hungary
Slovakia
Bulgaria
Belgium
Sweden
Norway
with our colours green/yellow/orange)
Finland
Estonia
Austria
Ireland
Greece
Poland
Cyprus
France
Latvia
Malta
Spain
ADA
Italy
People using a wheelchair c c c c c c c c p c c c c c c p c c c p c c c c c
People with walking difficulties c c c c c c c c p c c c c c p c c c c p c c c c
People with reduced manual dexterity / arm function
c p c c p p p n c c p c p p c n c c p c p c c
/ strength
People with vision impairments / blind c p c c p c c c p c c c c p c p c n c p n c c c c
People with Hearing impairments / deaf c p c c p p c p p c c p p p c p c n c n p c p c c
People with Intellectual / cognitive / mental
impairments c p c p p p p p n c n p n p n p p n c n p c p c p
People with allergies p n c n p n n p n n n n n n n n n n n n n p n c n

People with diversities in age and stature c p c c p c c p p p p c n n n n n p n p c c c
Others:
users with colostomy (ISO, Sweden); Loendurance (P);
p c p p p
Pregnant woman, mothers with prams, mothers
guiding children with 3 years (CZ)
- 300 -
ANNEX H
Input data of team B report
H.1 Identification of conformity assessment schemes and requirements for technical capacities
Table H.1.1 - CEN 207 Conformity assessment schemes
Requirements for technical capacities
Conformity assessment scheme established in documents (regulations,
CEN 207 Conformity assessment schemes schemes are addressed or
type standards, guidance) that enforce
enforced through:
conformity schemes on accessibility?
Requirements Requirements Requirements
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
established for established for established for
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
planners and building bodies or
Other
Inventory
Name Link designers contractors persons
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
43 10 22 38 12 11 19 17 29 16 16 yes
57% 13% 29% 39% 12% 11% 20% 18 48% 26% 26% yes
%
31 42 42 no
27% 37% 37% no
EUROPEAN
UNION (EU)
MEMBER
COUNTRIES
AUSTRIA
AUSTRIA BEP Etappenplan für die BGStG, ÖNORM B Internal document
Adaptierung der ASchG, 1600 for all public
Barrierefreiheit in BEinstG buildings used in
Bundesgebäuden / Stages of different responsible
adaptation planning for departments of
accessibility in buildings of the different federal
x y n y
federal government ministries (used for
adaptation of cultural
buildings, tax
authorities, police
stations, railway
stations etc.)
AUSTRIA ÖNORM B ÖNORM B 1610 Barrier-free ÖNORM B First pilot project by
1610 buildings and installations - 1600 'Austrian Standards
Requirements for evaluation of plus Certification' not
search.at
www.as-
x y y y
accessibility (2008-02-01) yet finished
- 301 -

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
Belgium CWATUPE Code wallon de l'aménaement
http://mrw.w
allonie.be/dg
atlp/dgatlp
du territoire, urbanisme,
patrimoine et de l'énergie x y y y
Belgium Un espace publique pour tous x y n n

Belgium Un Un Logement pour tous » Pour
Logement une Wallonie accessible
pour tous »
x y n n
Pour une
Wallonie
accessible
Belgium Cahier de Cahier de prescriptions
prescriptions techniques pour l’accessibilité
techniques et l’adaptation des logements
pour sociaux pour personnes
l’accessibilit handicapées
é et
x y n n
l’adaptation
des
logements
sociaux pour
personnes
handicapées
Belgium Fiches Fiches techniques pour faciliter
techniques la réalisation de plans, ANLH-
pour faciliter ACCESA 10 fiches (recto/verso)
la réalisation
de plans, x y n n
ANLH-
ACCESA 10
fiches
(recto/verso)
- 302 -

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
Belgium Design For Design For All : « AAoutils –
nlh.be/aaoutil
http://www.a
s/aaoutils/ind
All : « Architecture et Accessibilité
ex.htm
AAoutils –
x y n n
Architecture
et
Accessibilité
Belgium RRU Règlement régional
ru.irisnet.be/f
http://www.r
r/indexfr.htm
d'urbanisme -
x y y y
BELGIUM
(Flanders)
BELGIUM Federale wet Federale wet van 17 juli 1975 FED75
(Flanders) van 17 juli betreffende de toegang van
1975 gehandicapten tot gebouwen
betreffende toegankelijk voor het publiek.
de toegang (KB van 9 mei 1977)
van
gehandicapt
x y n n
en tot
gebouwen
toegankelijk
voor het
publiek.
(KB van 9
mei 1977)
- 303 -

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
BELGIUM Vlaamse Vlaamse Codex Ruimtelijke VCRO

(Flanders) Codex Ordening (decreet van 16 juli
Ruimtelijke 2010 (B.S. 9/8/2010)): Art.
Ordening 2.3.1. De Vlaamse Regering
(decreet van kan gewestelijke
16 juli 2010 stedenbouwkundige
(B.S. verordeningen vaststellen voor
9/8/2010)): een deel van of voor het hele
Art. 2.3.1. gewest. Die verordeningen
De Vlaamse bevatten de nodige
Regering kan stedenbouwkundige
gewestelijke voorschriften om te zorgen http://www2.vlaanderen.be/ruimtelijk/wetgeving/decreet/VCRO.html
stedenbouw voor: de toegang voor
kundige personen met een
verordening functiebeperking tot al dan
en niet bebouwde onroerende
vaststellen goederen of delen ervan
voor een toegankelijk voor het publiek,
deel van of tot installaties en wegen,
voor het
hele gewest.
Die
verordening
x y n n
en bevatten
de nodige
stedenbouw
kundige
voorschrifte
n om te
zorgen voor:
de toegang
voor
personen
met een
functiebeper
king tot al
dan niet
bebouwde
onroerende
goederen of - 304 -
delen ervan
toegankelijk
voor het

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
BELGIUM Dossiersamenstelling: 16, 2°, c) DS

(Flanders) zo het een geheel of deels
voor het publiek toegankelijk
gebouw betreft, een
beschrijving van de al dan niet
vergunningsplichtige
voorzieningen om integrale
toegankelijkheid te bereiken
x y
voor de personen met
verminderde beweeglijkheid.
Hierbij wordt bijzondere
aandacht besteed aan die
voorzieningen die verder gaan
dan de wettelijk vastgelegde
normen; + ART. 16 13° een
mobiliteitsstudie
BELGIUM GSV Besluit van de Vlaamse GSV
ten/index.html &
anderen.be/ruim
telijk/wetgeving/
uitvoeringsbeslui
www.toegankelij
http://www2.vla
(Flanders) Regering van 5 juni 2009 tot

kgebouw.be
vaststelling van een

gewestelijke x y y n
stedenbouwkundige
verordening
betreffende toegankelijkheid
- 305 -

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
BELGIUM Wet van 10 Wet van 10 mei 2007 ter ADW
detail&id=15&select_page=12&setLanguage=1
http://www.diversiteit.be/?action=wetgeving_
(Flanders) mei 2007 ter bestrijding van bepaalde
bestrijding vormen van discriminatie (BS
van 30 V 07) - artikel 4 redelijke
bepaalde aanpassingen van de
vormen van arbeidspost voor personen
discriminatie met een beperking
(BS 30 V 07)
- artikel 4 x n n n
redelijke
aanpassinge
n van de
arbeidspost
voor
personen
met een
beperking
BELGIUM DTAH BS 08/5/2009 - 20 MAART DTAH
bladclip.zita.b
e/staatsblad/
2009035400.
wetten/2009
http://staats
/05/08/wet-
(Flanders) 2009 Decreet houdende de

html
toegankelijkheid van publieke x n n n

plaatsen voor personen met
een assistentiehond
BELGIUM MOPPMH Ministeriële omzendbrief van 3 MOPPMH

http://www.w
egcode.be/we
t.php?wet=72
(Flanders) april 2001 betreffende het

voorbehouden van
x y n n
parkeerplaatsen voor
personen met een handicap.
(B.S. 05.05.2001)
- 306 -

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
BELGIUM VD besluit van de Vlaamse VD
http://www2.vlaand
eren.be/ruimtelijk/v
ergunningen/verord
eningen/verordenin
(Flanders) regering van 29 april 1997
houdende vaststelling van een
algemene bouwverordening
x y n n
inzake wegen voor
gen.html
voetgangersverkeer
(Voetgangersdecreet)
bvr 29/4/1997 b.s. 7/5/1997
BELGIUM Geregistreerde Belgische NBN
(Flanders) technisch rapport NBN ISO/TR9527
x n n n
ISO/TR9527:1994 -
Ontwerprichtlijnen.
BELGIUM EN 81-70 EN 81-70:2003 EN 81-70
(Flanders) Veiligheidsregels voor het
vervaardigen en het
aanbrengen van liften —
Bijzondere toepassingen voor
personenliften en personen- x y y n
goederenliften — Deel 70:
Toegankelijkheid van liften
voor personen inclusief
personen met een handicap |
6.8.2005
BELGIUM VADV VADEMECUM
ganger01.php
mobielvlaand
eren.be/vade
emecumvoet
mecums/vad
http://www.
(Flanders) VOETGANGERSVOORZIENINGE VADV

N 2003 x n n n
BELGIUM VADF Vademecum

mobielvlaand
eren.be/vade
mecums/vad
emecumfiets
http://www.
(Flanders) Fietsvoorzieningen dateert van

VADF
2002, herzien in 2006 en 2008, x n n n

01.php
BELGIUM HBTPG Handboek Toegankelijkheid HBT x n n n
- 307 -

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
(Flanders) publieke gebouwen PG

BELGIUM MGW Ontwerpgids Levenslang
www.meegro
eiwonen.info
(Flanders) Wonen (1999) en ontwerpgids
MGW
Meegroeiwonen (2009) x n n n
BELGIUM ZS De zilveren sleutel ZS
www.dezilver
ensleutel.be
(Flanders)
x n n n
BELGIUM WENK Wenkenbladen

http://www.e
ndex.php?id=
ntervzw.be/i
(Flanders) toegankelijkheid
WENK
x n n n
7
BELGIUM TVWTCB WTCB-Dossiers – TVWTCB

be/tis_toegankelijk/?cat=
http://www.toegankelijk.
(Flanders) Toegankelijkheid
van trappen
- Veiligheid en toeganke-
lijkheid van gebouwen -
x n n n
Toegankelijkheid van
documents
buitenschrijnwerk - Evacuatie
van
personen met beperkte
mobiliteit bij brand
BELGIUM VADTPD Vademecum ‘Toegankelijk
http://www.e
ndex.php?id=
ntervzw.be/i
(Flanders) Publiek Domein’

VADTPD
x n n n
102
- 308 -

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
BELGIUM TOEVL Premie uitgereikt door
wpage.asp?iP
http://www.t
deren.be/sho
oerismevlaan
(Flanders) toerisme vlaanderen voor
ageID=233
TOEVL
toegankelijke toeristische x n n n
accommodaties
BELGIUM RBLL Richtlijnen voor de aanpassing
e/801_TG.HT
chtenliefde.b
blindenzorgli
http://www.
(Flanders) van gebouwen voor visueel
RBLL
gehandicapten, Blindenzorg x n n n
Licht en Liefde
M
BELGIUM BN Braillenormen - brailleliga BN
brailleliga.be/
nl/document
atie/andere/
http://www.
(Flanders) default.asp
x n n n
BELGIUM TB Digitale TB
e/toegbrochu
chtenliefde.b
re/index.htm
blindenzorgli
http://www.
(Flanders) toegankelijkheidsbrochure
x n n n
BULGARIA
BULGARIA
CYPRUS
CYPRUS BCA Cyprus BCA scheme for safety and
BCA Cyprus
accessibility
x
CZECH
REPUBLIC
- 309 -

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
CZECH BCA Czech BCA Czech Republic

REPUBLIC Republic
BCA Czech
Republic
x
DENMARK
DENMARK BCA Building Control authority BR 2010 Partly established
schemes x x n n n through informal BCA
schemes
DENMARK AR Accessibility Revision, roads Requirements only
and public areas established for AR
HIT x n n n
roads and public
spaces revision
DENMARK SBi SBi checklists, building BR 2010
www.sbi.dk/t
ilgaengelighe
assessment tool
d/tjeklister
SBi 230
x
DENMARK UBST UBST standard, University BR 2010 Partly established

www.sbi.dk/t
d/tjeklister/u
ilgaengelighe
Buildings assessment tool through informal BCA
SBi 230
x n n n schemes and UBST
consultants
bst
DENMARK Godadgang Godadgang, Tourism Labelling Combined rating and

www.godadg
System updating system

ang.dk
x x x n n n partially based on
Danish Standard DS
3028.
ESTONIA
ESTONIA BCA Building Control Authority none EE Build §47 of the Act
Scheme Act x provides an
opportunity to
- 310 -

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
register as "specialist
in charge" in e.g.
accessibility
FINLAND
FINLAND SCW Supervision of construction LUBA
x n n n
work
FRANCE
FRANCE BCA France BCA France x
GERMANY
GERMANY privat institutions x x x x x n n n
GERMANY BCA BCA Bundesländer x
Bundeslände
r
GREECE
GREECE GDSBW 7A, Guide for the Development of
2000 School Building Works, Tool
GDSBW 7A, 2000

no. 7A. First edition, 2000.
www.mou.gr
Management Organisation
Unit of Development x n n n
Programmes S.A. (For
administration of the EU
Support Framework), Ministry
of National Finance.
GREECE PD 43/2002 Greek National Tourism PD
MINDEV Organisation. Classification of 43/2002 x y y y
Hotels MINDEV
GREECE J-TAP, 2008 “JASON” Programme. Typical Proposed checking
J-TAP, 2008
Action Plan for Restoring and conformity

Accessibility at the Local Level. scheme for local
x n n n
Guideline, ESAMEA. National authorities, designed
Organisation of Disabled by national disability
Peoples’ Associations NGO
- 311 -

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
GREECE Circ. Government Circular. Ministry Government Circular

8303/2008 of Interior. 8303/08.02.2008. for municipalities,
Circ. 8303 /2008

MININT. Accessibility Network for (THESEAS
MININT.
People with Disabilities programme 2005-
x n n n
removing barriers from 2009), to implement
common areas. legal framework ref.
DGPA 1998 MINENV.
For outdoor areas.
GREECE MCAPSI, Methodology for Checking MC Ministerial
2009. Accessibility in Public Services APS conformity checking
MININT. and Infrastructures. 2009. I, scheme
Ministry of the Interior. 200 x n n n
9.
MIN
INT.
HUNGARY
HUNGARY BCA Hungary BCA Hungary
IRELAND
IRELAND PA Planning Authority Scheme PA Scheme
Developmentand
Regulations 2001
www.environ.ie/
g/FileDownLoad,
en/Publications/
Housing/Plannin
potentially important
Development
but rarely used for

1582,en.pdf
Planning &
x x x n n n implementation &
control of
accessibility
standards
IRELAND BCA Building Control Authority Building Notification of
Scheme Control intention to
Regulation commence works
x x x n n y
s 1997 - must be given to
2009 BCA. Limited training
of BC Officers
- 312 -

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
IRELAND BCA FSC Building Control Authority Fire Building Emergency

Safety Certificate Scheme Control evacuation of people
Regulation with disabilities
TGD B 2006
s 1997 - considered under
2009 x x x n n y Fire Safety Certificate
application. Limited
training of fire
officers in access
issues
IRELAND BCA DAC Building Control Authority Building BCA certifies
Documents/FileDownLoad
opmentandHousing/Buildi
www.environ.ie/en/Devel
ngStandards/Publications
Disability Access Certificate Control compliance at design
Scheme Regulation stage with
TGD M 2000
s 2009 requirements of Part
M of the Building
x x x n n y
RegulationsVery
,1594,en.pdf
limited training of
building control
officersScheme
introduced 2010
ITALY
ITALY BCA Italy BCA Italy BCA Italy x
LATVIA
LATVIA BCA Building Control Authority none LV
Scheme Constructi x x n n n
onLaw
LITHUANIA
LITHUANIA BCA Building Control Authority none LT Article 10, §2 of the
Scheme Constructi Act: The qualification
on Law requirements for
planners, designers
x
etc. shall be laid
down by an
institution authorised
by the Government.
- 313 -

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
LUXEMBOUR
G
LUXEMBOUR
G
MALTA
MALTA
NETHERLAN
DS
NETHERLAN RBP REGULAR BUILDING PERMIT
Development
Decree+Local
DS
Aesthetic
Building
x x y y n
issues
Plan
NETHERLAN LBP LIGHT BUILDING PERMIT For some minor
Development
DS Decree+Local construction works
Building
x x y y n
Plan
NETHERLAN UP USE PERMIT For special buildings,

DS using by many people
Decree+Fire
Building
x x y y y
Safety
Norway
- 314 -

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
Norway NORWAY Plan- og Par 9-13 in the

bygningslo Planning and Building
ven, Act regulates the
Byggteknis qualification
k forskrift, requirements for
Byggesaks companies seeking
x (from 1 July 2011)

forskriften approval as exerting
x (voluntary)
(into force responsibility for a
1 July x n n n set of domains,
2010) specified in the Act.
Accessibility is,
however, not such a
domain. From 2013,
accessibility will be a
prioritized domain
for supervision by the
municipalities
POLAND
POLAND BCA Poland BCA Poland BCA Required for persons
Poland x y checking access
issues
PORTUGAL
PORTUGAL
ROMANIA
ROMANIA BIS Building Inspection Scheme Law 50
http://www.i
sc-web.ro/
X N X X y N N
SLOVAKIA
SLOVAKIA BCA Slovak BCA Slovak Republic BCA
Republic Slovak x
Republic
- 315 -

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
SLOVENIA
SLOVENIA BCA Slovenia BCA Slovenia BCA
Slovenia
SPAIN
SPAIN LO Building permit - Licencia de CTE +
Obra regional
x x y y
decree+
local rules
SPAIN PO-LA First Occupation / Opening CTE +
License - Primera Ocupación / regional
x x y y
Licencia de Apertura decree+
local rules
SPAIN CA Accessibility Certificate - UNE 170001
x x x y
Certificado de Accesibilidad
SWEDEN
- 316 -

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
SWEDEN PBL In Sweden accessibility is an Note: The
BBR (including standards referred to in BBR) PBL, BVL, BVF. (There are no conformity scheme
essential requirement on municipality can
construction works, and the decide that the
but the control should make sure that the requirements in the documents are fulfilled
same conformity assessment accessibility control
rules apply as for other has to be done by
essential requirements. No person approved by
specific schemes for the municipality or a
conformity assessment of person with a
accessibility requirements certification
exist.
But there are regulations
about when and by whom the
controls have to be done. The
site is controlled in connection
www.boverket.se
to building permission (by the
See note
local building committee) and
the building later in the
process. The builder is
responsible but the local
building committee might
decide that the accessibility
control must to be done by an
independent expert (see
column I). A controlplan is
done where accessibility is one
control among many others.
No further details how the
control should be done are
given. What is controlled is
that the building law (including
building code) is followed.
(Some changes in the process
described above are decided).
SWEDEN PBL The site is controlled in
connection to building
permission. The building is
- 317 -

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
controlled in a later stage in

the process when a
controlplan is established.
Accessibility is usually
mentioned as one control that
has to be done, but no more
details are given.
UNITED
KINGDOM
UNITED Building Building Regulations
x y y y
KINGDOM Control
UNITED Approved Building Regulations Applies to accredited
KINGDOM Inspector x x y y y Approved Inspectors
Scheme only.
UNITED Planning Town and Country Planning
x y y y
KINGDOM Acts
INTERNATIO
NAL - NON-
EU MEMBER
COUNTRIES
AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIA BCA BCA Australia BCA Access consultants
Australia Australia more often than not
x x
are involved in all
stages
CANADA
Canada TB CAN/CSA-B651-04
- 318 -

enforced through:
Building control
accreditation of
Certification or
Supplier self-
certification
Regulations
declaration
Third party
Standards
Guidance
authority
suppliers
scheme
Other
Inventory
abbreviation
operating BC
systems
CANADA OBC Building Inspection Scheme Ontario
laws.gov.on.ca/html/sta
tutes/english/elaws_sta
Building
tutes_92b23_e.htm
Code Act
http://www.e-
x y y y
CANADA ASCS Compliance Assessment Ontario

laws.gov.on.ca/html
/regs/english/elaws
_regs_070429_e.ht
Scheme Regulation
429/07,
http://www.e-
Accessibility
x x x y y y
Standards
for
Customer
m
Service
CANADA IAS Integrated Accessibility Ontario Anticipated that
Standard Regulation regulation will be
(TBD) enacted mid-2011
CANADA FADS Facility Accessibility Design Municipal Only a requirement
ondon.ca/d.as
bility/accessib
ilitystandards.
px?s=/Accessi
http://www.l
Standards Council for projects funded

Policy by the municipality -
x y
Approval compliance is
htm
encouraged for
others
UNITED
STATES OF
AMERICA
(USA)
UNITED USA BCA USA BCA Example USA BCA USA BCA
STATES OF Example Example Example
x
AMERICA
(USA)
- 319 -
H.2 Data collected for conformity assessment of the accessibility requirements during building phase in EU Member States
H.2.1 Austria
Country Austria
Scheme name including

W-BO
abbreviation
No.
Building phase Input documents Activities performed Responsibilities Output documents Remarks
crt
1 Application/planning Planning (design) Accordance of the Building authority is Routing sheet where Slight differences
drawings and reports project with local generally the local architects (or other between provinces (9
for application for development plan authority. authorized planners) different countries).
building project, see assessed by planning are collecting approvals
Only in the following 5 (6) countries have
below. authority. of different
three cases it is the already incorporated
governmental
Only authorized experts Building permission district authority as part the harmonized building
departments of the
(architects, civil process is different in of the federal regulation according
building control
engineers, government- small municipalities government accessibility and
authority concerning
approvedmasterbuilder and cities. In cities responsibilities (e.g. for usability of the built
their planning and
or responsible different departments employment issues, environment in their
design before the
construction site of building control transport, railway, building regulation
application of a building
manager) have to sign authority have to give streets, public spaces: which is stated in OIB-
permit.
the plans and can apply their final approval in Guideline 4. OIB-
- for buildings of the
for a building permit. the building permit’s Guideline 4 makes
federal government,
process (architectural strong references to
Plans should follow the
design, fire safety, - for buildings for trade, different clauses in
requirements of the
stability etc.) commerce and ÖNORM B 1600 where
building regulation and
depending on the size industry with the principles of
the state of the art.
and use of the employees accessible built
Plans* and reports building. In public (employee-protection environment are
about emergency exits building works where legislation Asch) described as state of the
- 320 -
Country Austria

W-BO
abbreviation
No.
crt
and escape routes the owner is the city - in small municipalities art.
concept depending on government (Vienna) which have
Generally architects
the size and use of the the access board transferred this task
have to follow all
building. department is to the district
technical requirements
included in the authority.
*planned by fire-safety which are ‘state of the
approval process as
experts together with art’. This is usually
authorized expert and
architect required in the building
gives the final
design and
approval for
procurement process by
accessibility design.
the building authority
and also by private
building owner/
customers.
2 Application/building Documentation of Accordance of the Building authority Building permit ---

project construction drawing project with building issuing building permit.
Confirmation of
and details regulation.
architect about
Technical reports where fulfilment of
For certain projects,
necessary (fire safety, accessibility
small adaptation works
emergency exit plans) requirements (only in
for which a simplified
Vienna)
procedure applies:
architect, civil engineer,
Declaration of
government-
conformity with
- 321 -
Country Austria

W-BO
abbreviation
No.
crt
accessibility guide lines approvedmasterbuilder
has to be delivered by or responsible
the planning architect construction site
(only in Vienna manager delivers a
required) notice of
commencement
3 Construction Documentation of In public building Building construction Notes, entry into the ---
construction drawing works concerning firms supervised by building book
and details public spaces and architect,
streets the access
In case of accidents
board department is
building authority is
included in the
involved;
construction process
as authorized expert
and gives the final
approval for special
accessibility design
solutions – in special
cases supported by
experts with mobility
impairment and/or
sensual (vision)
impairment.
- 322 -
Country Austria

W-BO
abbreviation
No.
crt
Participation of
technical supervisor if
facultative included as
an integral partner in
planning and
construction phase,
4 Completion As-built drawings Technical handover, Contractor manager, Application of General the architect is
technical supervisor occupancy permit after the responsible
(access consultant) who delivery of all necessary authorized expert in
confirms fulfilment with confirmations; planning within the
building regulation and in Vienna also with framework of the state
accessibility confirmation of of the art + building
requirements (only in architect or supervisor regulation
Vienna) (civil engineer) to prove
the fulfilment of
accessibility
requirements –may be
supported by a
certificate of access
consultants (not usual
practice)
5 Use certification of access --- --- Occupancy permit ---

consultant to prove the
- 323 -
Country Austria

W-BO
abbreviation
No.
crt
fulfilment of
accessibility
requirements
New certification standard ÖNORM B 1610 “Barrier-free buildings and installations - Requirements for evaluation of accessibility” under pilot testing phase
within Austrian Standards Certification department!
H.2.2 Australia
Country Australia

abbreviation (as in spreadsheet
Building Code of Australia BCA
'CEN 207 Data Collection
100809'):
No.
crt
1 Application/planning Planning or Evaluation of Local Government Compliance certificate Often conditions relate
Development planning/development Planning Authority or that the submitted to the inclusion of
Application depending application. State/Federal plan fulfils all of the access requirements
in which state the Government if a State DDA/BCA access into the detailed plans
Certificate issued,
project will be. /Federal facility Requirements. and documentation.
often with conditions
in relation to access.
- 324 -
Country Australia

100809'):
No.
crt
Opportunity for
community to
comment on if likely
to affect their
amenity.
2 Application/building Application for a Detailed evaluation of Local Government Report detailing issue No compliance
project building permit all plans and Planning Authority or that need rectification requirements in the
opportunity for public State/Federal followed by reform of a letter at this
to comment on if Government if a State auditing of detailed stage.
likely to affect their /Federal facility plans & letter of
amenity. confirmation .
3 Construction Regular site visits at Report on issues None to date. Site visits and
critical times to ensure immediately and inspections must be
setouts, clearances ensure that timed to ensure that
and gradients will be appropriate action is critical issues are
achieved. Form work taken, if not work evaluated for
needs to be checked through the issues compliance.
before the pouring of with the builder and
concrete. building surveyor in
order to resolve the
issue.
No need to issue any
- 325 -
Country Australia

100809'):
No.
crt
discontinuation
notices as yet due to
all involved being
aware of their
responsibilities.
4 Completion Final inspection at Audit final facility for Letter of compliance Letter of compliance to
practical completion full compliance. If when issues have been building surveyor who
issues are present, rectified. will not issue
provide a detailed certificate of
report od issues with occupancy (CofO) until
compliant solution/s to rectification work has
fix. been carried out. If of
a minor nature a
conditional CofO will
be issued.
5 Use These all vary Appropriate licences BCA Valid licences if
according to the class to be obtain, required.
of building, which is depending on the type
clearly set out in the of facility.
BCA.
- 326 -
H.2.3 Belgium
Country Belgium (Flanders)
Scheme name including - Vlaamse Codex Ruimtelijke Ordening (VCRO)

abbreviation (as in
- Dossiersamenstelling: 16, 2°, c (DS)
spreadsheet 'CEN 207 Data
Collection 100809'): - Gewestelijke stedenbouwkundige verordening betreffende toegankelijkheid (GSV)
No.
crt
1 Application/planning **
2 Application/building Building permit to be The local authority has Architect, owner and Building permit
project obtained from local to check if the building builder are responsible
authority (city). permit is ok. They for the correctness of
have to check if there the planning
(DS) determines the file
is a note on application.
composition of a
accessibility and if the
building license and The local authority has
regulation on
says that there has to to check this.
accessibility (for public
be a note on
buildings) is applied.
accessibility.
If there is an
accessibility advice it is
added (not required)
3 Construction Notification of the local A safety coordinator Architect, owner, /

authority at the start of controls the building contractor
site at safety
- 327 -
Country Belgium (Flanders)
Scheme name including - Vlaamse Codex Ruimtelijke Ordening (VCRO)

abbreviation (as in
- Dossiersamenstelling: 16, 2°, c (DS)
Collection 100809'): - Gewestelijke stedenbouwkundige verordening betreffende toegankelijkheid (GSV)
No.
crt
the work regulations.
In case of an
accessibility advice, a
Accessibility
consultancy can do a
control of the building
site if the works that
concern accessibility
are going ok.
4 Completion / / / /
5 Use / provisional acceptance Builder, architect, /

of the building, final contractor
acceptance after 1
year
Red gives everything on accessibility.

*Remarks: these 3 documents determine the building control system in case of accessibility.
**Every region in Belgium has his own planning.
- Ruimtelijk Structuurplan Vlaanderen (RSV)= zoning in Flanders
- 328 -
- Gewestelijk bestemmingsplan (GBP) = zoning in Brussels

- Schéma de Développement de l'Espace régional d'Aménagement (SDER) = zoning in Wallonne.
Spatial planning in Flanders is determined by spatial structure plans and spatial implementation plans at the level of Flanders, the provinces and the municipalities.
H.2.4 Cyprus
Country: Cyprus
Scheme name (as in

SUABW-2010 - Approved Prototype for the Safe Use and Accessibility of Building Works, April 2010. Ministry of the Interior.
spreadsheet):
No.
crt
1 Application/ planning - - - - Planning permission is

covered elsewhere, not
in this conformity
scheme. After the
planning permission is
approved, then the
building permit is
applied for.
2 Application/building The architect submits Approved Adviser of The public authority is With the signed
project the design drawings to Safety of Use and responsible for issuing Statement, the building
public authority. Accessibility checks the build permit, which permit is issued.
Architect also submits a the design. includes the Adviser
‘Statement of Safe Use checking the statement
and Accessibility’. covering all aspects of
The Adviser approves the safe use and
and signs the accessibility of the
Statement when it is project.
correct, in order for it
- 329 -
Country: Cyprus
Scheme name (as in

SUABW-2010 - Approved Prototype for the Safe Use and Accessibility of Building Works, April 2010. Ministry of the Interior.
spreadsheet):
No.
crt
to be submitted with
the drawings.
3 Construction - - - -
4 Completion Adviser checks the Public authority and With the end of work of The certificate of Safe
completed building Adviser building, the Authority Use and accessibility
evaluates the level of accompanies the
achievement of application for
accessibility work and publication of final
publishes the Certificate approval of building
of Safe Use and from the responsible
Accessibility. After the authority and no such
guarantee of which, the application will be
building owner is examined without the
compelled to display he above Certificate.
International Symbol of
Access in the entry of
building.
5 Use - - - - The conformity scheme

does not cover the use
period of the building.
- 330 -
H.2.5 Denmark
Conformity schemes are designed by the Municipal Authority Building Control departments themselves, and no detailed or harmonized National
schemes as such exist; foundations as such are simply the Building Regulations, and these have to be met. The stage of the building process at
which assessment is introduced may for this reason vary, but it normally first happens along with the application for a building permit or prior
introductory talks.
Municipal Authority Building Control departments are the principal bodies involved in conformity assessment
An interesting third type of mechanism for conformity assessment is appearing in later years, as it is being stressed more clearly in legislation today that
responsibility for compliance with requirements lie almost entirely with the owner/builder, and not with the municipal authorities. Even when projects and plans
have been checked by the authorities the burden still lies with the applicant/builder/owner. This in theory entitles third parties to intervene if they after
completion discover that a building does not comply with regulations at a certain point. The system then allows the person to contact the municipal authorities
and file a complaint, and the municipality then is obliged to direct itself towards the owner of the building and demand the flaw be corrected. There’s no law suit
to it for the third party person. This mechanism does not apply to buildings erected before building regulations started to include accessibility measures, but in
principle works retrospectively for two or three sets of regulations. The full extent of this type of control remains to unfold, also as it represents a shift towards
less municipal involvement in the first round of procedures, and most likely because procedures differ from municipality to municipality
H.2.6 Estonia
Country Estonia
Scheme name including (Sources: Building Control Systems in Europe, Consortium of European Building Control, June 2006, the Estonian Building Act,
abbreviation and information from Jüri Järve, Estonian Union of Persons with Mobility Impairment)
No.
crt
1 Application/planning Levels of plans: Approval by: - Ministry of Internal Approved plans

- State (regional) plan - Regional Minister Affairs
(Government)
- County master plan - County Governor
- County Governor
- Local master plan - (Planning division of)
- 331 -
Country Estonia
No.
crt
- Local detailed plan (Regional Minister) local government
Provide detailed plan in - Municipality Council
rural areas or (local plans)
plan of location
2 Application/building - Output from planning Control of compliance Planning division of Building permit Master drawings of
project process to a plan and to local government buildings for large
human
- Master drawings by building regulations Authorities (Rescue
designer (in crowds are subject to
Board, Environment
case of simpler assessment.
When needed, control Inspectorate, etc)
buildings by
and approvals of
contractor)
Authorities (Rescue Building permit is being
- Building permit Board, Environment inserted into buildings
- When needed: results Inspectorate, etc) Register.
of geologic
research, approvals of
In Tallinn, a disability
Authorities
organisation, TLIÜ,
examine building design
projects and street/road
design for city planning
- 332 -
Country Estonia
No.
crt
departments.
3 Construction Project for execution Continuous control by Owners control The Estonian Building
and records of owner’s Act contains no specific
representative, local
provision on conformity
completion of specific representative
government, Technical assessment of
construction works. approved by local
Inspectorat accessibility
government. Site requirements. The
checks by local provisions on
government and State conformity assessment
surveillance refer to the building
design documentation
authority and legal requirements.
The building design
documentation shall
comply with
requirements laid down
in §3 of the Building Act,
of which accessibility is
one. Hence, accessibility
control is part of
construction control.
- 333 -
Country Estonia
No.
crt
4 Completion All above with Final inspection by Local government Permit for use Permit for use is being
instructions for use and local government. inserted into buildings
maintenance. register
When needed,
When needed,
Authorities (Rescue
Application for permit involvement of
for use Board, Environment
Authorities (Rescue
Board, Environment Inspectorate, etc)
Inspectorate, etc)
Technical Inspectorate
Site checks by State
surveillance
authority.
5 Use All above Site checks by local Planning division of Building owner is
government and local government responsible of condition
by State surveillance Authorities (Rescue
authority
Board, Work
Environment
Inspectorate, Technical
- 334 -
Country Estonia
No.
crt
Inspectorate
H.2.7 Finland
Country Finland

abbreviation:
No.
crt
1 Application/ planning Regional plan, sets out Taking into account The regional plan is Approval of plans
the principles of land different aspects, such approved by the
use and community as regional council's
structure, and highest decision-making
designates areas as body. Following
necessary for regional appropriate approval, the regional
development. regional and plan is submitted to the
community competent ministry for
structure of the ratification.
Local master plan region;
provides general
ecological
- 335 -
Country Finland

abbreviation:
No.
crt
guidance regarding the sustainability of The local master plan is
community structure land use; approved by the local
and land use of a council.
environmentally
municipality or a part
and economically
thereof, and to
sustainable The local detailed plan
integrate functions.
arrangement of is approved by the local
transport and council.
Detailed local plan technical services;
sustainable use of
water and
The local detailed plan extractable land
is drawn up for the resources;
purpose of detailed
organization of land operating
use, building and conditions for the
development, with the region's
aim of designating areas businesses;
necessary for different protection of
purposes and of landscape, natural
steering building and values, and
other land use, as cultural heritage;
required by local and
conditions, townscape
and landscape, good sufficient
- 336 -
Country Finland

abbreviation:
No.
crt
building practice, availability of
promoting the use of areas suitable for
existing building stock recreation.
and other steering goals
of the plan.
2 Application/building Applications shall Neighbours shall be The local building Building permit
project include proof that the notified. supervision authority
applicant is the
titleholder of the
building site, and the Check of drawings.
master drawings signed
by the designer.
3 Construction Before construction Start-up meeting Site manager, Inspection record No accessibility experts
work is commenced, are available on the
the local building market.
supervision authority Inspections by the The local building
shall be notified thereof building control supervision authority
authority during the The building authorities
course of the work. have to master
accessibility issues.
Inspections may be
assigned to the Some municipalities
- 337 -
Country Finland

abbreviation:
No.
crt
developer or the have disability councils
designer, or to with some expertise in
experts. accessibility.
In order to guarantee
that construction work
has been carried out
properly and to verify
inspections an
inspection record is
kept at the building
site. Checks,
inspections by the
authorities and
inspections of work
specified as being
carried out by private
parties are entered in
the record.
4 Completion Application for final Checking that The local building Approval for use
inspection, presuming supervision authority
Obligations in the
that the work is
permit are
finalized, the building is
- 338 -
Country Finland

abbreviation:
No.
crt
ready for use, and the fulfilled,
prescribed inspections
Inspection record
and correctives
is complete
measures are made.
When applying for a Prescribed
final inspection, the restriction of use
building's instructions (if any)
for use and
are arranged
maintenance, if such
have been required,
must be sufficiently
complete and ready to
be handed over to the
owner of the building.
5 Use Buildings and their If the duty to keep a

surroundings must be building in proper repair
kept in a condition is neglected, the local
that meets standards building supervision
of health, safety and authority may
fitness for use at all intervene.
times and does not
cause environmental
harm or damage the
beauty of the
- 339 -
Country Finland

abbreviation:
No.
crt
environment.
- 340 -
H.2.8 Germany
Country Germany
Scheme name including Regulation/standards or guidelines enforcing the conformity assessment schemes for control/inspection of construction
abbreviation (as in works including architects' services:
Collection 100809'):
No.
crt
1 Application/planning In accordance with the Architects, engineers, HOAI Official Scale of

Official Scale of Fees landscape designers and Fees for Services by
for Services by other designers Architects and
Architects and Engineers
Engineers (HOAI),
planning is divided in
two phases.
Depending on the
complexity of the
construction project,
certain items may be
excluded. Planning
must take account of
the relevant statutory
and technical
provisions. The aim of
building regulations is
to ensure the safety
and serviceability of
the finished structure.
The designer must
- 341 -
Country Germany
No.
crt
take the relevant
provisions, also
referred to as
recognized rules of
technology in the field
of construction, into
consideration. In
addition, compliance
with other legal
regulations and laws
(such as building
codes) is required.
Planning: Clarification of tasks and

technical and economic
-Specification of
issues
fundamentals
Planning: Design concept,

-Preliminary planning Possibly proposals for
and estimating cost of alternative solutions.
- 342 -
Country Germany
No.
crt
projects Ascertaining costs as
specified in DIN 276
Planning: Design drawings on

scale of 1:100,
-Design and
calculation of costs project description,
calculation of costs as
specified in DIN 276
-Plans for submission Drafts for submission

with applications for with applications for
planning permission planning permission
-Execution planning Execution drawings on

scale of 1:50, detail
drawings on scale of 1:5
to 1:20,
project description for
execution
- 343 -
Country Germany
No.
crt
2 Application/building Invitation to tender: Building specifications German Construction

project including bill of Contract Procedures
-Preparation of tender
quantities for obtaining (VOB Vergabe- und
documents including
tenders for execution of Vertragsordnung für
including bill of
the construction project Bauleistungen)
quantities (LV)
VOB/A General
provisions relating to
the award of
construction contracts
(Allgemeine
Bestimmungen für die
Vergabe von
Bauleistungen)
VOB/B General
conditions of contract
relating to the
execution of
construction work
- 344 -
Country Germany
No.
crt
(Allgemeine
Vertragsbedingungen
für die Ausführung von
Bauleistungen)
VOB/C General
technical specifications
in construction
contracts (ATV) -
General rules applying
to all types of
construction work
(Allgemeine Technische
Vertragsbedingungen
für Bauleistungen)
Invitation to tender: Assessing tenders,

drawing up a price
- Participation in
comparison
procedures for
awarding contracts
including estimation of
- 345 -
Country Germany
No.
crt
costs
3 Construction Management of Daily site records Supervising the

works: construction of the
building and checking
-supervision of
for compliance with
construction and
design plans, bill of
determining cost
quantities and
recognized rules of
technology, drawing up
and supervision of time
schedule, checking site
measurements and
invoices submitted by
construction
companies, approval of
work, and establishing
any defects or
deficiencies in the
works, supervising
remedial work
- 346 -
Country Germany
No.
crt
9.Maintenance and
documentation
4 Completion Declaration of
compliance with
accessibility
requirements submitted
to building authorities
who check compliance
with building
regulations when the
completed structure is
inspected prior to
approval.
Approval of public
works has been reduced
in recent building
regulations. In the
majority of cases, only
random inspections are
now carried out.
- 347 -
Country Germany
No.
crt
Approvals exist for the

following:
- profiles (setting-out)
- building carcass
- finished structure
5 Use
VOB (German Construction Contract Procedures)

The revised version, VOB 2009 is now available and was officially published in German Federal Gazette No. 155 on 15 October 2009, p. 3549. Part A in particular
has been amended extensively. The application of VOB 2009 has been mandatory since an amendment to the regulations concerning the award of construction
contracts, in which the application of the revised version of VOB/A is stipulated, came into effect on 11 June 2010.
HOAI
The HOAI, the Official Scale of Fees for Services by Architects and Engineers), Bundesrat (Upper Chamber of Parliament in Germany), publication no. 395/09, 30
April 2009
- 348 -
Annex 11 states nine phases for the design and construction of buildings and interior work as defined in article 33 of HOAI:
Planning and design 1.Specification of fundamentals
2.Preliminary planning and estimating cost of projects
3.Design and calculation of costs
Plans for submission with applications 4.Plans for submission with applications for planning permission
for planning permission
Execution planning 5.Execution planning
Invitation to tender 6.Preparation of tender documents including bills of quantities
7. Participation in procedures for awarding contracts including estimation of costs
Management of works 8.Supervision of construction and determining cost
Maintenance and documentation 9. Maintenance and documentation
- 349 -
H.2.9 Greece
Country Greece
Scheme name including Greek National Tourist Organisation (GNTO) Classification of main hotel types, in categories (star system) and their technical
abbreviation (as in requirements.
Collection 100809'): PD 43/2002 MINDEV.
No.
crt
1 Application/planning Planning Application, Application checked Min. Environment GNTO approval Requirements are set by
by the relevant bodies certificate to build a the law
GNTO
and GNTO. hotel on the selected
Approval of suitability
site.
of land
Legal permits, including
plans to be submitted,
technical reports about
location, access and
utilities, local
architecture,
infrastructure,
environmental impact
assessment.
Bank certificate of fee
payment
- 350 -
Country Greece
Scheme name including Greek National Tourist Organisation (GNTO) Classification of main hotel types, in categories (star system) and their technical
abbreviation (as in requirements.
Collection 100809'): PD 43/2002 MINDEV.
No.
crt
2 Application/building Architectural design Checked by GNTO GNTO GNTO approval for The access
project plan. architectural study requirements are
Architectural design checked in the
plan and other studies Building Permit Office drawings, according to
e.g. Fire Protection Building permit the legal requirements
Building Permit Office
Study. for various categories of
hotels.
3 Construction Project Manager
4 Completion The completed hotel Accessibility measures GNTO GNTO Hotel Operating
buildings and facilities as built are checked as Licence
part of star category
award procedure
5 Use The completed hotel Accessibility measures GNTO GNTO Hotel Operating
buildings and facilities may be checked Licence
during use period
- 351 -
H.2.10 Hungary
Country Hungary

abbreviation (as in
---
No.
crt
1 Application/ Documentation of Building permission Authorities issuing Building permit * certification of rehab.
building plan and process, building permit and engineer to prove the
planning
statement of designer designer, fulfillment of
*supervision of rehab.
to prove fulfilment of accessibility
engineer *rehab. engineer
building requirements requirements
2 Application/ Documentation of *Supervision of rehab. Designer **Certification of rehab. ---

construction drawing engineer engineer to prove the
building project *rehab. engineer
and details fulfilment of
accessibility
requirements
3 Construction Documentation of Participation of Authorities responsible Notes, entry into the ---
construction drawing technical supervisor, for building supervision building book
and details (building inspector),
*Supervision of rehab.
technical supervisor,
engineer
**rehab. engineer
4 Completion As-built drawings Technical handover, Contractor manager, Occupancy permit*,

*Supervision of rehab. technical supervisor,
- 352 -
Country Hungary

abbreviation (as in
---
No.
crt
engineer *rehab. engineer
5 Use --- --- --- --- ---
Notes:
*In case of building projects financed by governmental bodies, when rehabilitation engineers must be involved in the projects or rehabilitation engineers are
involved by contract.
**In case of building projects, when rehabilitation engineers are involved by contract.
H.2.11 Ireland
Country Ireland

Building Control Authority Disability Access Certificate Scheme - BCA DAC
abbreviation
No.
crt
1 Application/planning
- 353 -
Country Ireland

abbreviation
No.
crt
2 Application/building Application form, Assessment of Building Control Disability Access Building Control
project drawings and application Authority, Certificate. Revised Authority has
compliance report documents. Issue of Appeals Board Disability Access discretionary powers.
demonstrating that Disability Access Certificate Legal requirement to
design complies with Certificate with or comply with Building
Part M (Access for without conditions Regulations lies with
People with Disabilities) attached. Decision owners and contractors.
of the Building may be appealed. Also a legal requirement
Regulations to obtain a Disability
Access Certificate.
3 Construction Random monitoring of Building Control Enforcement Notice The level of inspection
construction / Authority may apply to by the BCA is very low -
inspection of works the Courts for an order sometimes only one
for compliance with to remove, alter or inspection and only 12%
the regulation, make safe or to to 15% of projects
technical guidance and discontinue non inspected.
Disability Access compliant works.
Certificate documents
4 Completion Random inspections BCA may apply to the Owners / third parties
by Building Control Courts for an order to such as law agents, or
Authority (BCA) restrict or prohibit use insurance companies
of the building until DAC may require Opinions
- 354 -
Country Ireland

abbreviation
No.
crt
is granted and complied on Compliance on the
with . completed building
from the designers and
contractors / suppliers.
5 Use Enforcement in Building Control Building may not be

relation to non Authority opened or used without
compliance. a Disability Access
Prosecution for non Certificate.
compliance BCA has limited
functions in relation to
management and
maintenance of
accessibility
assessment only made

of applications for Fire
Safety Certificates and
Disability Access
Certificates - see also
BCA-FSC and BCA-DAC
schemes. No mandatory
checks of other bldg
regarding documents.
- 355 -
Country Ireland

Building Control Authority - BCA
abbreviation
No.
crt
2 Application/building Commencement notice BCA may check and Building Control BCA maintains register Responsibility of
project must be lodged with approve / disapprove Authority and Appeals of commencement designers, builders and
BCA 14 - 28 days before design documents and Board notices and decisions building owners to
starting works, calculations but not comply with
alterations or changing obliged to. Decisions regulations. Formal
use. may be appealed.
3 Construction Random monitoring of Building Control Enforcement Notices

construction for Authority
Building Regulation
compliance. Issuing of
Enforcement Notices
for non-compliant
works. Prosecution
4 Completion Enforcement Notices Provision in BC Act for

may be issued up to 5 regulations to be made
years after requiring lodgement of
completion. . self assessment
Certificates of
Compliance by
- 356 -
Country Ireland

Building Control Authority - BCA
abbreviation
No.
crt
designers / contractors
etc but no regs in place.
Some private schemes
require self assessment
by designers /
5 Use Some bars, clubs etc are Safety notices may be Fire Authority, Health Health issues &
licensed by District served Board, Local Authority Dangerous structural
Court and documents dangerous buildings defects monitored and
demonstrating section controlled. Fire safety
compliance with and fire management
building regulations issues monitored and
may be required controlled - see also
BCA-FSC and BCA-DAC
schemes
- 357 -
Country Ireland

Building Control Authority Fire Safety Certificate Scheme – BCA FSC
abbreviation
No.
crt
1 Application/planning See PA scheme
2 Application/building Application form, Assessment of Building Control Fire Safety Certificate. It is a Legal
project drawings and application Authority (Fire Revised Fire Safety requirement to obtain a
compliance report documents. Issue of Department) Certificate. Fire Safety Certificate.
demonstrating that Fire Safety Certificate Regularisation Note: In some local
design complies with with or without Certificate authorities the fire
Part B (Fire) of the conditions attached. departments and
Building Regulations building control
department are one. In
others they are
separate. Issues of
evacuation for people
with disabilities dealt
with under Part B
3 Construction Random monitoring Building Control Enforcement Notice The level of inspection
of construction / Authority (Fire by the BCA is very low -
inspection of works Department) may apply sometimes only one
for compliance with to the Courts for an inspection and only
Fire Safety Certificate order to remove, alter 12% to 15% of projects
documents or make safe or to inspected.
discontinue non
compliant works.
- 358 -
Country Ireland

abbreviation
No.
crt
4 Completion Random inspections BCA may apply to the Owners / third parties
by Building Control Courts for an order to such as law agents, or
Authority (BCA) / Fire restrict or prohibit use insurance companies
Department of the building until FSC may require Opinions
is granted and complied on Compliance on the
with . completed building
from the designers and
5 Use Inspection of Building Control Building may not be

premises in use Authority (Fire opened or used without
(under the Fire Department) a Fire Safety Certificate.
Services Act). Some uses, bars, clubs
etc require licences
Enforcement in
which are granted by
relation to non
the Courts. The Courts
compliance.
generally seek
Prosecution for non
confirmation that
compliance
planning permission
and Fire requirements
are met but rarely seek
confirmations on
- 359 -
Country Ireland

abbreviation
No.
crt

accessibility. Most
inspections are done of
places of assembly
Country Ireland

abbreviation (as in
Planning Authority Scheme - PA
No.
crt
- 360 -
Country Ireland

abbreviation (as in
No.
crt
Planning (design) Documents are Planning Department Planning Permission Planning legislation
drawings and reports. assessed by Planning (Local Authority) and with / without relates to spatial,
(Some developments Authority against Planning Appeals Board conditions attached environmental, societal
may require policies contained in a make decisions and and cultural objectives.
Environmental Impact Development Plan and carry out limited Generally permission is
Assessments and / or a decision made to inspections. required for any
Conservation reports. grant or refuse development including
Very occasionally permission subject to building, demolition
Access Statements are other statutory and alterations and also
required but are not requirements being if significantly changing
mandatory) met. Decisions may be the use of a building.
appealed by applicant Planning Authority is
/ third parties to an separate to Building
independent body, Control Authority.
the planning appeals Planning approval is
board. sought early in the
design process and
before building control
approvals. Accessibility
frequently incorrectly
considered to be
primarily a building
control and not a
- 361 -
planning control
matter. Most private
developments are
Country Ireland

abbreviation (as in
No.
crt
2 Application/building Additional documents Additional Documents

project sometimes required for may require
lodgement with agreement by the
planning authority Planning Authority.
before construction During construction
can begin to there may be random
demonstrate that inspections by the
planning permission planning authority.
conditions have been
complied with in the
design.
3 Construction Inspections during the

construction period by
the planning authority
are rare and mainly
relate to enforcement
of regulations if they
are known to be in
breach
- 362 -
Country Ireland

abbreviation (as in
No.
crt
4 Completion Nothing on public file Planning Authority NOTE During

except if Enforcement maintains a register of construction or up to 7
notice served. For all decisions made incl. years after completion
some developments enforcement notices planning authority may
the building owner and issue legal Enforcement
other parties, law Notice requiring
agents, insurance compliance work to be
companies etc may done.
require the design
team and contractors /
suppliers to certify or
give opinions on
compliance of the
development with
planning permission
5 Use Unauthorised
development or use of
a building may result in
legal action to prevent
- 363 -
Country Ireland

abbreviation (as in
No.
crt
its use until the
situation is regularised
H.2.12 Italy
Conformance Assessment Schemes exist principally in the area of Building Control as operated by the Local Authorities. These schemes commence reasonably
early in the design process but are mainly reliant on a process of “self-certification”.
H.2.13 Latvia
Country Latvia

(Sources: Building Control Systems in Europe, Consortium of European Building Control, June 2006; Latvian Construction Law)
abbreviation
No.
crt
- 364 -
Country Latvia

abbreviation
No.
crt
1 Application/ planning - Application card for Positive conclusion The construction board Approved plans In Latvia there are 3
registering construction of local government levels
(construction on the
in the construction compliance with the of building control:
board of local master plan, building
1. supervision on the
government. provisions, detailed
building site;
plan) or motivated
refusal of the 2. control of building
- Public discussion of construction board of inspectors of the
proposed development local government. construction board
plan in the following (local government);
cases:
3. The state control of
1. structure of public building work is the
importance is planned; responsibility of the
State Building
2. building is to be
Inspectorate.
financed by the
government or the
municipality;
3. the planned building
is going to seriously
affect the environment,
the living conditions of
the inhabitants or the
- 365 -
Country Latvia

abbreviation
No.
crt
real estate value;
4. the planned building
will be located in the
public used area.
- Planning and
architecture provisions
on positive conclusion
for planned building
2 Application/building To commence designing - Checking all Architecture division of Construction permit The Latvian
project the following provisions and Construction Law states
local government
documents that “a structure shall
other documents for
be designed and
and materials are
designing constructed so as to
required:
ensure (…) accessibility
1. the topography plan of the environment (…)
of the land plot to scale - Control qualification as well as [the 6
The construction board
M1:500–M1:1000; (designer) of local government essential
2. the site plan to scale requirements+”
M1:2000 – M1:10000; (section3, item 3).
- Project expertise The State Building Hence, accessibility is
3. the inventory Inspectorate
materials of the building included, on equal
- 366 -
Country Latvia

abbreviation
No.
crt
if the construction plan terms, in the list of
is based on an existing mandatory attributes.
- Making the decision The construction board
building;
on the of local government
4. the technical
acceptance of the Section 4 states that the
examination data of the
Ministry of Economics
building, where construction plan or
shall “monitor and
appropriate; motivated refusal to
control compliance with
accept
5. the terms of the requirements for
reference concerning the accessibility of the
ecology in compliance The construction board environment in public
- Control qualification
with the law ”On State of local government buildings and
Ecological Expertise”; (contractor, structures”.
supervisor)
6. the terms of
reference concerning
The construction board No further provisions on
sanitary hygienic issues, - Building permission
of local government conformity assessment
if so required by the
(building permit for a of accessibility
construction board;
specialised building requirements are stated
7. the technical shall be issued by the in the Law.
provisions issued by the ministry supervising
construction board or the specialised
by the owner or user of construction, the
the service lines; respective ministry
may delegate the said
- 367 -
Country Latvia

abbreviation
No.
crt
8. the consent on rights to the
principle by the construction board)
respective institutions
on demolition the
existing buildings and
dismantling the service
lines and on cutting
trees and bushes where
appropriate;
9. the technical
provisions issued by the
Fire and Rescue
Emergency Service of
the Ministry of Internal
Affairs;
10. others materials
required for designing,
if so stipulated by
construction provisions,
the detailed plan, the
terms of reference
concerning planning
and architecture or
specialised building
- 368 -
Country Latvia

abbreviation
No.
crt
provisions;
11. planning and
architecture provisions;
12. specialized building
provisions.
3 Construction - Customer (client) and Performing control: - Inspectors of the

contractor agreement construction board of
1. notes of state and
local government
- Contractor and local government
subcontractors authority in registers; - The State Building
agreements Inspectorate
2. checking acts.
- Customer provide the
contractor with all
documents required Construction
(e.g., accepted building surveillance by
project) and receive supervisors
permits and licenses
relevant to the
construction work.
- Construction register
- Register for special
work
- 369 -
Country Latvia

abbreviation
No.
crt
- Register of authorship
supervision
4 Completion - Construction plan Checking - The construction board The Latvian

of local government construction Law does
- Building permit Documents
not specify any final
completion
- Construction register certificate
- The State Building
- Register for special
work Inspectorate
- Register of authorship
supervision
- Regional
- Declarations and environmental
certificates of building
board
materials
- Test of building
materials reports - Fire authority
- Acceptance certificates
of the finished elements - Health authority
of major constructions
and non-accessible
work - Workplace authority
- Conclusions of Fire
- 370 -
Country Latvia

abbreviation
No.
crt
authority, Health
authority,
Workplace authority
(ready for use)
- Positive statement of
customer about building
(ready for use)
5 Use The Latvia Building Construction board of

Standard set the local government
procedure
of a structure approval
The State Building
for use
Inspectorate
Construction work
Fire authority
guarantee –at least 2
years
Health authority
Workplace authority
- 371 -
H.2.14 Lithuania
Country Lithuania
Sources: paper of Branco Pedro, Meijer, Visscher: “Comparison of tasks and responsibilities in the building control systems of
Scheme name including European Union countries”, September 2009;
abbreviation
Lithuanian Construction Law
No.
Building phase Input documents Activities performed Responsabilities Output documents Remarks
crt
2 Application/building Several, inter alia: The Permanent The director of the Construction permit
project Construction administration of a
- a design
Commission must municipality
documentation of a
check and establish
construction works;
whether design
- findings of expert documentation meets
examination of a design the requirements
documentation of a (regulations) for the
construction works improvement of a
(where mandatory); construction plot laid
- a document of down in physical
approval of a design planning documents
documentation of a as well as the
construction works requirements of a set
(where mandatory); of design conditions
and the legal acts
specified in the
regulations of the
Permanent
- 372 -
Country Lithuania
abbreviation
No.
crt
Construction
Commission.
3 Construction Article 16, par. 2: A building surveyor Article 6, item 3:

appointed by the
The technical Design, construction,
applicant conducts site
supervisor of reconstruction and
inspections, with the
construction or a major repairs of
building authority
construction works buildings and
participating as well for
must: engineering works must
some categories of
be carried out in such a
1) monitor the construction works
way that they will
compliance of
satisfy the specific
construction with the
needs of the disabled
design documentation
persons in compliance
of a construction
with the Law on Social
works, check the
Integration of Invalids.
quality of construction
products and
equipment used
during the
construction, and
prevent them from
being used in case
- 373 -
Country Lithuania
abbreviation
No.
crt
they do not comply
with the design
documentation of a
construction works,
normative technical
construction
documents, normative
documents pertaining
to the safety and
purpose of a
construction works,
and if no documents in
confirmation of the
quality have been
provided;
2) check the quality of
construction
operations and the
scope thereof, inform
the builder (client)
about the carried-out
construction
operations which do
- 374 -
Country Lithuania
abbreviation
No.
crt
not satisfy
requirements for
normative quality of a
construction works;
3) check and accept
hidden construction
operations and hidden
structures of a
construction works,
participate in testing
and accepting as fir for
use engineering and
utility networks,
engineering systems,
equipment and
structures;
4) jointly with the
contractor prepare
documents for
accepting the
construction works as
fit for use and
- 375 -
Country Lithuania
abbreviation
No.
crt
participate during the
acceptance of the
construction works as
fit for use.
5) perform functions
of the head of general
technical supervision
of the construction
(general construction
operations), co-
ordinate special
technical supervision
of the construction
(special construction
operations) and
activities of the heads
of such supervision.
4 Completion The building authority

(different for different
types of buildings)
issues the completion
- 376 -
Country Lithuania
abbreviation
No.
crt
certificate.
5 Use - - - - -
H.2.15 Luxembourg
In Luxembourg regulations around accessibility were limited to some safety criteria in public schools until 2001.
In 1999, the Ministry of Family (responsible for disability questions in Luxembourg) trusted the national disability information and meeting centre Info-Handicap to
setup an interdisciplinary workgroup and to develop accessibility criteria to be anchored in a national legislation.
The members of the group analyzed the existing approaches at European level and adapted them to the national situation in order to come up with a set of
recommendations to be published in a document called “Guide des Normes”.
In parallel an “interministerial committee” worked on the elements to be included in the legislation. The new legislation was composed of 2 parts:
a) the main law that anchored the obligation for accessibility of all new “public” buildings and all “public” buildings to be substantially renovated;
b) the technical execution text of the law precising the type of buildings, the elements, and the accessibility criteria to consider.
The law was (and still is) limited to “public” buildings, meaning buildings built or rented with public money by national or municipal authorities. The criteria
address mainly spaces meant for the “visitors”.
As there is no school for architecture in Luxembourg, the awareness raising at that level has to take place via special actions and information sessions organized on
the initiative of Info-Handicap. Although there is a general awareness towards the importance of an accessibility/ design for all approach, experience and
consequence are lacking.
- 377 -
The control activities if the legislation is implemented are placed under the authority of a Governmental body, the “national office for safety in the public
administration”. This body works with agreed companies, in general specialized in safety and energy saving activities, and trusts them with the accessibility
controls. The law foresees that all checked buildings should be identifiable through a particular label, but this has never been done.
Public procurement activities in Luxembourg follow strict rules and the mandatory technical sheets for responding to calls have to be downloaded from a
Governmental server. Although the recent Directives on public procurement have been transposed in Luxembourg, including the options for accessibility and for
social criteria, the technical sheets do not yet take on board accessibility in a consequent way and the process for adapting them is quite heavy as it must be done
in cooperation with the professional Chambers of each single profession.
Any accessibility related activity in the private sector (shops, restaurants, hotels, etc…) is purely volunteer and Info-Handicap, together with several partners have
set up a National Accessibility Concept out by the MEGA (Multidisciplinary Experts Group for Accessibility) in order to raise awareness, provide technical guidance
and organize training activities for the private sector. The concept includes also a label called “EureWelcome” to identify the private buildings that have been
assessed.
For the time being, the situation in Luxembourg can be summarized as follows:
- there is a general “good-will” attitude towards accessibility, but only as long as there are no costs
- Technicians are lacking information and craftsmen rely to architects (“I install what they tell me”)
- lobbying of people with disabilities is quite poor in Luxembourg
H.2.16 Norway
Country Norway

This conformity assessment scheme follows from provisions in the Plan- and Building Act, and the Technical Regulations
abbreviation (as in
(Teknisk forskrift) to the Act, in force since 1 July 2010 (some provisions from 1 July 2011), and the regulation on works
(byggesaksforskriften).
No.
crt
The Norwegian
1 Application/planning Three levels of plans: Plans are publicly Municipality Approved and decided
legislation uses the
national, regional and published for allowing management plan(s)
Norwegian words for
- 378 -
Country Norway

abbreviation (as in
No.
crt
municipality. The stakeholders to review the term “universal
municipality plan has and submit remarks. design”, not
two parts: one about “accessibility”.
the activities of the
municipality, one about
use of land. In the latter
part, the municipality
may lay down
provisions on universal
design. The municipality
plan will be broken
down In area plans and
detail plans. In such
plans, the municipality
may lay down further
provisions on universal
design.
2 Application/building The application for Where appropriate, a Municipality Building permit

project building permit shall preparatory meeting
include information on may be held for
how universal design is mutual information
taken into account, between the
- 379 -
Country Norway

abbreviation (as in
No.
crt
where relevant for the municipality and the
building in question. applicant.
Based on the
information in the
application, the
municipality shall
approve it, provided
that the application
does not violate
provision in or
following the planning
and building Act.
There is no particular
3 Construction The party responsible According to the QMS The party responsible According to the QMS
provision concerning
for the construction for control
control that
shall have a quality
requirements on
management system
universal design are
(QMS), capable of
fulfilled.
ensuring and recording
that the provisions of
- 380 -
Country Norway

abbreviation (as in
No.
crt
the Act are fulfilled.
The municipality may

decide that an
independent body
performs an inspection
of the QMS.
4 Completion Final documentation, Checking submitted Municipality Certificate of

showing that subjects of documentation completion
control the works
complies with the
building permit and Issuing a certificate of
provisions in the Act or completion
following the Act. The
documentation shall
include recording of
control activities,
including attestation
that deficiencies have
been corrected.
- 381 -
Country Norway

abbreviation (as in
No.
crt
5 Use For subjects where a

building permit is
required, the final
documentation shall
include information
which can serve as a
basis for management,
operation and
maintenance of the
subject.
H.2.17 Netherlands
Country THE NETHERLANDS
Scheme name including RBP - REGULAR BUILDING PERMIT

abbreviation (as in
LBP - LIGHT BUILDING PERMIT
Collection 100809'): UP - USE PERMIT
No.
crt
- 382 -

abbreviation (as in
No.
crt
1 Application/planning Together with

-Accordance with local
application for
development plan
building project.
2 Application/building - Small alterations to

project dwellings, buildings in
-Checking on building
Drawings including gardens, road works,
decree and building -[RBP] Regular Building
site plan etc are exempt from
regulations Building Control Division Permit building permit.
Technical calculation of the local authority -[LBP] Light Building
and drawings. - Report of building
Permit
Headlines only application to be
published in a local
paper
3 Construction -Checking on building

Technical decree and building Building Control Division
calculations and regulations of the local authority
working drawings in
- Inspection on the (municipality)
detail
building site
4 Completion - No action required Building Control Division

No documents
by the applicant. The of the local authority
required
municipality can forbid (municipality)
- 383 -

abbreviation (as in
No.
crt
the use of the building
when works are not
done according to
building permit
5 Use -Fire department or

- Fire safety
For special buildings Building Control Division
- The municipality may of the local authority Application for use is
(used by many
inspect the conformity purely focused on fire
people) an - Building Control - [UP] Use Permit
of a building with the safe use of the building,
application is needed Division of the local
building decree or number of people, etc.
to use the building authority (not
building regulations
structural)
H.2.18 Romania
Country: Romania
Scheme name (as in

Building Inspection Scheme
spreadsheet):
No.
crt
- 384 -
Country: Romania
Scheme name (as in

spreadsheet):
No.
crt
1 Application/ planning Design request related Application for the An chartered architect Urbanism certificate When accessibility
to the land urbanism certificate carried out the first that is a formal answer requirements are
characteristics and issued by the local paper to document to the intention to included in the scope of
owner request authority request erected a building for urbanism certificate and
those land the project, those are
Authority
followed during the
representatives
normal flow of the
reviewed the
construction works,
application
checks and inspections.
2 Application/ building Urbanism certificate Architects and/or Chartered architects, Technical project with
project Design bureau carried construction engineers all written and drawn
out the project with all for structures and pieces together with
component related installations, verification report(s)
taking into issued by the chartered
Chartered verifiers for
consideration the verifiers.
each essential
regulatory
requirement.
requirements and
functional Building permit
requirements as well
as the existing
limitations.
- 385 -
Country: Romania
Scheme name (as in

spreadsheet):
No.
crt
A such project
includes parts as
follows:
- architecture
- resilience and
structure
- electrical, thermal
and sanitary
installations
- verification of the
project for all essential
requirements for its
class
3 Construction Building permit Starting the Owner notice the local Formal notification of
construction authority about the starting works.
Technical project
open the construction
yard.
The construction Write report for each

The constructor has the
activities are phase indicated in the
responsibility to respect
progressing according project.
the technical project.
project plans. Owner
- 386 -
Country: Romania
Scheme name (as in

spreadsheet):
No.
crt
has the responsibility Owner by his/her Declaration of
to hire a competent representative has the conformity for the
person to follow these responsibility to assure construction products
activities. This person that construction is that are included in the
is also qualified and erected according the building.
chartered by the project.
governmental
authority for building
– in this case is a During this phase, the
governmental representative of local
department.. authority for building
could inspect the yard.
4 Completion Building permit At the end of All the report filled Records regarding Or Building Book
construction activity, during construction building
Technical project
the owner and phase, test report for
constructor ask to the construction
architect to ascertain materials and
that building was declaration of
erected according to conformity with CE
the technical project. marking together with
technical project are
compiled into file and The role of this report is
give indication about to ascertain the
conformity of the
- 387 -
Country: Romania
Scheme name (as in

spreadsheet):
No.
crt
the building with the
technical plans by the
architect
Owner and construction
representative ask to
architect to release a
report regarding the
reception of the
building
5 Use Building permit The owner has to Owner -

assure for the safety
Technical project
of the building. In
some cases – very old Local government Formal notification
building – the
inspectors from local
government have the
responsibility to notice
the owner about any
danger to population
safety.
- 388 -
H.2.19 Spain
Country Spain
Scheme name including LO Licencia de Obra – Building License -

abbreviation (as in
PO-LA Licencia de Primera Ocupación y/o Licencia de Apertura – First Ocupation Permit / License Opening -
Collection 100809'): CA Certificado de Accesibilidad – Accessibility Certificate -
No.
crt
1 Application/ planning (together with Accordance with The City Council --- ---
application for building local development
Regional or National
project) plan.
Authorities (in case of
protected places or
protected buildings)
2 Application/ building Application for Checking whether Official College of [LO] Building License ---
project building execution Architect and Architects
license Technical Architect
The City Council
are authorized to
Basic preliminary
draw up the building
project
project
Health and Safety
Checking whether
Study
project comply with
‘CTE’ (Technical
Building Code) and
regulations
3 Construction Building Execution Inspections on site Works Director --- Building license,
by Works Director Health and Safety at
- 389 -
Country Spain

abbreviation (as in
No.
crt
Project (architect) Director Director of the Work Plan, Book of
of the Execution of Execution of the Technical Orders and
Notification of
the Works (Technical Works Incidents Book have
commencement of
Architect) and to be on site during
works to the Labour Health and Safety
Health and Safety the construction
Authorities by the Coordinator
Coordinator process
contractor
Technical Control
Inspections by a
Office (only for
technician of a
collective housing)
Technical Control
Office
4 Completion Works Final Certificate Checking whether Works Director and [PO-LA] First Slight differences
stamped by the the works have been Director of the Occupation Permit among regions
Professional College executed in Execution of the (dwellings) or License
of Architects and the compliance with Works Opening
Professional College building laws,
The City Council
of Technical Architects regulations, the
approved building
The called ‘Book of
project and the
the Building’, must
building license
include all the
documentation
related with quality
- 390 -
Country Spain

abbreviation (as in
No.
crt
control
5 Use Application for Inspections by The City Council (in Activity License [CA] Accessibility
Activity License with municipal technical any cases regional Certificate (optional
Technical Project (no (in any cases technicians) process)
required for regional technicians)
dwellings)
H.2.20 Sweden
Country Sweden
Scheme name including This conformity assessment scheme concerns buildings and some specified other works, to be complied with by private and
abbreviation public developers. Conformity assessment of requirements for public places is not regulated.
No.
crt
1 Application/planning Overall plan over the Checking with Building committee of Approval of plan(s) Municipalities have
area, showing the use of environmental and the municipality monopoly of local
land and water and how regional provisions planning of the built
- 391 -
Country Sweden
No.
crt
the municipality intends environment. For
to develop and maintain regional and national
the built environment; infrastructure, e.g.
roads, concerned
Detailed plan showing
municipalities must be
location for roads, public
consulted.
places, infrastructure,
buildings for residential
areas, industry etc.
Accessibility
requirements may be
specified in functional
terms at an overall level.
2 Application/building Application for building Checking that the Building committee of Building permit
project permit, including site building, the site and the municipality
plan, drawings, its use are in
descriptions and other accordance with the
information necessary overall plan and the
for control against detailed plan.
regulations.
Checking of the
building location on
the site and the
external design of the
- 392 -
Country Sweden
No.
crt
building.
Conformity to
technical
requirements, such as
accessibility, are not
assessed in the permit
process.
3 Construction A notification from the Consultative meeting The meeting is under An inspection schedule
developer to the building to examine the responsibility of the containing:
committee that the work construction project Building Committee.
inspections to be
will start and who is and to decide on an
carried out;
appointed as Quality inspection schedule.
Assurance Supervisor The developer has the attestations and
full responsibility for other documents to
ensuring that technical be shown to the
requirements are Committee;
fulfilled. As regards legal
notifications to be
requirements, this is
made to the
under surveillance by
Committee.
the Quality Assurance
Supervisor Inspections can be
made by means of the
developer’s own control
- 393 -
Country Sweden
No.
crt
process, by third party
experts or, if necessary,
by the Building
Committee.
A conformity
assessment scheme of
accessibility
requirements, where
applicable, will be
specified in the
inspection schedule.
4 Completion All required Checking submitted Building Committee Certificate of

documentation documentation completion
according to the
Issuing a certificate of
inspection schedule
completion
5 Use The building owner is National and local

responsible for regulation authorities
maintaining the for e.g. health, work
building in order to environment, fire safety
keep it conformant to etc.
- 394 -
Country Sweden
No.
crt
legal requirements.
H.2.21 Great Britain
Country): Great Britain
Scheme name (as in

Approved Inspector Scheme
spreadsheet):
No.
crt
2 Application/building Notice to Local Checks compliance of Local Authority Initial notice to Local There are two types of
project Authority that project drawings and details Authority of the Approved inspector –
will be supervised by an with the Building appointment of an organisations and
Approved Inspector. Regulations. Approved Inspector. individuals.
Approval may be given Issue of a plans The reasons a

at stages as the certificate certifying the developer, client or
design/construction design and plans have contractor may use an
- 395 -
Country): Great Britain
Scheme name (as in

Approved Inspector Scheme
spreadsheet):
No.
crt
work develops. been checked and Approved Inspector is
comply with the purely personal and
Building Regulations. may range from a wish
to operate with people
in the private sector
rather than the public
sector to a simple
preference to work with
an AI who can operate
on a nationwide scale
rather than a local one
(perhaps leading to
more consistency in the
decision making
process).
3 Construction Visits as required
4 Completion Certificate of Issue of a final

completion certificate on
completion
5 Use
- 396 -
Country Great Britain
Scheme name (as in

Building Control (England and Wales)
spreadsheet):
No.
crt
2 Application/building Building notice must be Local Authority must Local Authority Details of projects and It is the responsibility of
project lodged with the local check drawings. decisions the designers and
authority, usually 2 days Approval may be given building contractors to
prior to the for various stages at a comply with the
commencement of time. Conditions and Building Regulations.
work. The Local time limits may be
Authority cannot imposed.
approve or reject the
building notice but can
ask for drawings and
details it need to
complete its building
control function.
3 Construction Additional details if At least one building Local Authority The Building Control
requested. site visit should be System should be as a
made. Random checking agency
monitoring. Issue of although some advice
notices for non- and guidance related to
compliance of works. the Regulations is often
Enforcement by given.
prosecution.
- 397 -
Country Great Britain
Scheme name (as in

Building Control (England and Wales)
spreadsheet):
No.
crt
4 Completion Completion Notices Completion notices

issued when work
meets the Building
Regulations.
5 Use Some responsibility for Safety and non- Local Authority Health and Safety issues
public assembly compliance notices and defects leading to
premises. may be served dangerous structures.
- 398 -
H.3 Description of the modules used for assessment of the infrastructure under TSI Directive
Description of the modules used for assessment o f the infrastructure under TSI Directive
We present below an extract from TSI directive concerning the description of the modules used in
conformity assessment of the accessibility requirements for TSI subsystems. We preserve the same
numbering because in the body text are links to different sections and any changes could affect the
understanding of text.
Description of the modules used for assessment o f the infrastructure
Description of the conformity assessment modules are very detailed and include a information about
tasks and responsibilities of the contractors, manufacturer and notified bodies involved as well
indication about the document issues for each type of conformity. We preserved the same
numbering as is indicated in the TSI directive for checking purposes.
F.3.Modules for the EC Verification of Subsystems
F.3.1. Module SB: Type Examination
1. This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified body checks and certifies
at the request of a contracting entity or its authorised representative established within the
Community, that a type of an infrastructure or rolling stock subsystem, representative of the
production envisaged,
— complies with this TSI and any other applicable TSI, which demonstrate that the essential
requirements (13) of Directive 01/16/EC have been met
— complies with the other regulations deriving from the Treaty.
The type examination defined by this module could include specific assessment phases — design
review, type test or review of manufacturing process, which are specified in the relevant TSI.
2. The contracting entity (14) shall lodge an application for EC verification (through type
examination) of the subsystem with a notified body of his choice.
The application shall include:
— name and address of the contracting entity or its authorised representative
— the technical documentation, as described in point 3.
3. The applicant shall place at the disposal of the notified body a specimen of the subsystem (15),
representative of the production envisaged and hereinafter called ‘type’.
A type may cover several versions of the subsystem provided that the differences between the
versions do not affect the provisions of the TSI.
The notified body may request further specimens if needed for carrying out the test programme.If so
required for specific test or examination methods and specified in the TSI or in the European
specification (16) referenced to in the TSI, a specimen or specimens of a subassembly or assembly or
a specimen of the subsystem in a pre-assembled condition shall to be provided. The technical
documentation and specimen(s) shall enable the design, manufacture, installation, maintenance and
operation of the subsystem to be understood, and shall enable conformity with the provisions of the
TSI to be assessed.
The technical documentation shall include:
— a general description of the subsystem, overall design and structure,
— the infrastructure or rolling stock register, including all information as specified in the TSI
— conceptual design and manufacturing information, for example drawings, schemes of
components, subassemblies, assemblies, circuits, etc.,
- 399 -
— descriptions and explanations necessary for the understanding of the design and manufacturing
information, the maintenance and the operation of the subsystem,
(13) The essential requirements are reflected in the technical parameters, interfaces and
performance requirements, which are set out in Chapter 4 of the TSI.
(14) In the module, ‘the contracting entity’ means ‘the subsystem contracting entity, as defined in
the directive. or his authorised representativeestablished within the Community’.
(15) The relevant section of a TSI may define specific requirements in this regard.
(16) The definition of a European specification is indicated in the directives 96/48/EC and 01/16/EC.
The guide for application of HS TSIs explains the way to use the European Specifications.
— the technical specifications, including European specifications, that have been applied,
— any necessary supporting evidence for the use of the above specifications, in particular where
European specifications and the relevant clauses have not been applied in full,
— a list of the interoperability constituents to be incorporated into the subsystem,
— copies of the EC declarations of conformity or suitability for use of interoperability constituents
and all the necessary elements defined in annex VI of the directives,
— evidence of conformity with the other regulations deriving from the treaty (including certificates)
— technical documentation regarding the manufacture and the assembly of the subsystem,
— a list of manufacturers, involved in the subsystem's design, manufacturing, assembly and
installation,
— conditions for use of the subsystem (restrictions of running time or distance, wear limits etc),
— conditions for maintenance and technical documentation regarding the maintenance of the
subsystem
— any technical requirement that shall be taken into account during production, maintenance or
operation of the subsystem
— results of design calculations made, examinations carried out, etc.,
— test reports.
If the TSI requires further information for the technical documentation, this shall be included.
4. The notified body shall:
4.1. Examine the technical documentation,
4.2. Verify that the specimen(s) of the subsystem or of assemblies or subassemblies of the
subsystem, has (have)been manufactured in conformity with the technical documentation, and carry
out or have carried out thetype tests in accordance with the provisions of the TSI and the appropriate
European specifications. Suchmanufacture shall be verified using an appropriate assessment module.
4.3. Where a design review is requested in the TSI, perform an examination of the design methods,
the designtools and the design results to evaluate their capability to fulfil the requirements for
conformity for the subsystem at the completion of the design process
4.4. Identify the elements which have been designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of
the TSI and the European specifications as well as the elements which have been designed without
applying the relevant provisions of those European specifications;
4.5. Perform or have performed the appropriate examinations and necessary tests in accordance
with points 4.2. and 4.3 to establish where the relevant European specifications have been chosen,
these have actually been applied;
- 400 -
4.6. Perform or have performed the appropriate examinations and necessary tests in accordance
with point 4.2. and 4.3. to establish whether the solutions adopted meet the requirements of the TSI
when the appropriate European specifications have not been applied.
4.7. Agree with the applicant the location where the examinations and necessary tests will be carried
out.
5. Where the type meets the provisions of the TSI, the notified body shall issue a type-examination
certificate to the applicant. The certificate shall contain the name and address of the contracting
entity and the manufacturer(s) indicated in the technical documentation, conclusions of the
examination, conditions for its validity and the necessary data for identification of the approved type.
A list of the relevant parts of the technical documentation shall be annexed to the certificate and a
copy kept by the notified body.
If the contracting entity is denied a type-examination certificate, the notified body shall provide
detailed reasons for such denial. Provision shall be made for an appeals procedure.
6. Each notified body shall communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information
concerning the type-examination certificates issued, withdrawn or refused
7. The other notified bodies may receive on request copies of the type-examination certificates
issued and/or their additions. The annexes to the certificates shall be kept at the disposal of the
other notified bodies.
8. The contracting entity shall keep with the technical documentation copies of type-examination
certificates and any additions throughout the service life of the subsystem. It shall be sent to any
member state which so requests.
9. During the production phase, the applicant shall inform the notified body that holds the technical
documentation concerning the type-examination certificate of all modifications which may affect the
conformity with the requirements of the TSI or the prescribed conditions for use of the subsystem.
The subsystem shall receive additional approval in such cases. In this case, the notified body shall
perform only those examinations and tests, those are relevant and necessary to the changes. This
additional approval may be given either in the form of an addition to the original type-examination
certificate, or by issue of a new certificate after withdrawal of the old certificate.
F.3.2. Module SD: Production Quality Management System
1. This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified body checks and certifies,
at therequest of an contracting entity or its authorised representative established within the
Community, that an infrastructure or rolling stock subsystem, for which already a type-examination
certificate has been issued by a notified body,
— complies with this TSI and any other applicable TSI, which demonstrate that the
essentialrequirements (17) of Directive 01/16/EC have been met
— complies with the other regulations deriving from the Treaty, and may be placed in service.
2. The notified body carries out the procedure, under the condition, that:
— the type examination certificate issued prior to the assessment remains valid for the subsystem
subject to the application,
— the contracting entity (18) and the main contractor involved are satisfying the obligations of point
3.The ‘main contractor’ refers to companies, whose activities contribute to fulfil the essential
requirements of the TSI. It concerns:
— the company responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in particular responsibility for
subsystem integration),
- 401 -
— other companies only involved in a part of the subsystem project, (performing for example
assembly or installation of the subsystem). It does not refer to manufacturer sub contractors
supplying components and interoperability constituents.
3. For the subsystem that is subject of the EC verification procedure, the contracting entity, or the
main contractor when employed, shall operate an approved quality management system for
manufacture and final product inspection and testing as specified in point 5 and which shall be
subject to surveillance as specified in point 6.
the directive. or his authorised representative established within the Community’.
When the contracting entity itself is responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in
particular responsibility for subsystem integration), or the contracting entity is directly involved in
the production (including assembly and installation), it has to operate an approved quality
management system for those activities, which shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point
6.If a main contractor is responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in particular
responsibility for subsystem integration), it shall operate in any case an approved quality
management system for manufacture and final product inspection and testing, which shall be subject
to surveillance as specified in point 6.
F.3.3. Module SF: Product Verification
1. This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified body checks and certifies
at the request of an contracting entity or its authorised representative established within the
Community, that an infrastructure or rolling stock subsystem, for which a type-examination
certificate has already been issued by a notified body,
— complies with the other regulations deriving from the Treaty and may be placed into service
2. The contracting entity (22) shall lodge an application for EC verification (through product
verification) of the subsystem with a notified body of his choice.
The application shall include :
— The name and address of the contracting entity or its authorised representative
— the technical documentation.
3. Within that part of the procedure the contracting entity checks and attests that the subsystem
concerned is in conformity with the type as described in the type examination certificate and satisfies
the requirements of the TSI that apply to it. he notified body shall carrying out the procedure under
the condition that the type examination certificate issued prior to the assessment remains valid for
the subsystem subject to the application.
4. The contracting entity shall take all measures necessary in order that the manufacturing process
(including assembly and integration of interoperability constituents by main contractor (23) when
employed) ensures conformity of the subsystem with the type as described in the type-examination
certificate and with the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.
5. The application shall enable the design, manufacture, installation, maintenance and operation of
the subsystem to be understood, and shall enable conformity with the type as described in the type
examination certificate and the requirements of the TSI to be assessed.
- 402 -
— the technical documentation regarding the approved type, including the type examination
certificate, as issued after completion of the procedure defined in module SB, and, if not included in
this documentation,
— the infrastructure or rolling stock register, including all information as specified in the TSI,
components, subassemblies, assemblies, circuits, etc.,
— the technical documentation regarding the manufacture and the assembly of the subsystem,
— the technical specifications, including European specifications (24), that have been applied,
these European specifications and the relevant clauses have not been applied in full,
— evidence of conformity to other regulations deriving from the treaty (including certificates) for the
production phase
— a list of the Interoperability Constituents, to be incorporated into the subsystem,
(23) The ‘main contractor’ refers to companies, whose activities contribute to fulfil essential
requirements of the TSI. It concerns the company that can be responsible for the whole subsystem
project or other companies only involved in a part of the subsystem project, (performing for example
assembly or installation of the subsystem). (24) The definition of an European specification is
indicated in the directives 96/48/EC and 01/16/EC. The guide for application of HS TSIs explains the
way to use the European Specifications.
— copies of the EC declarations of conformity or suitability for use with which said constituents shall
be provided and all the necessary elements defined in annex VI of the directives,
— a list of manufacturers involved in the subsystem's design, manufacture, assembly and
installation, If the TSI requires further information for the technical documentation, this shall be
included.
6. The notified body shall first examine the application concerning the validity of the type
examination and the type examination certificate.
If the notified body considers the type examination certificate no longer remains valid or is not
appropriate and that a new type examination is necessary, it shall justify its decision.
The notified body shall carry out the appropriate examinations and tests in order to check the
conformity of the subsystem with the type, as described in the type examination certificate and with
the requirements of the TSI. The notified body shall examine and testing of every subsystem
manufactured as a serial product, as specified in point 4
7. Verification by examination and testing of every subsystem (as a serial product)
7.1. The notified body shall carry out the tests, examinations and verifications, to ensure conformity
of the subsystems, as serial products as provided for in the TSI. The examinations, tests and checking
shall extend to the stages as provided for in the TSI.
7.2. Each subsystem (as serial product) shall be individually examined, tested and verified (25) in
order to verify its conformity with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and the
requirements of the TSI that apply to it. When a test is not set out in the TSI, (or in a European
Standard quoted in the TSI), the relevant European Specifications or equivalent tests are applicable.
- 403 -
8. The notified body shall agree with the contracting entity (and the main contractor) the locations
where the tests will be carried out and shall agree that final testing of the subsystem and, whenever
required in the TSI, tests or validation under full operating conditions, are carried out by the
contracting entity under direct supervision and attendance of the notified body. The notified body
shall have entrance for testing and verification purposes to production workshops, locations of
assembly and installations, and where appropriate, prefabrication and testing facilities in order to
carry out its tasks as provided for in the TSI.
9. Where the subsystem meets the requirements of the TSI, the notified body shall draw up the
certificate of conformity intended for the contracting entity, which in turn draws up the EC
declaration of verification intended for the supervisory authority in the Member State where the
subsystem is located and/or operates. These NB activities shall be based on the type examination
and the tests, verifications and checks carried out on all serial products as indicated in point 7 and
required in the TSI and/or in the relevant European specifications.
The EC declaration of verification and the accompanying documents shall be dated and signed. The
declaration shall be written in the same language of the technical file and shall contain at least the
information included in Annex V of the Directive.
10. The notified body shall be responsible for compiling the technical file that has to accompany the
EC declaration of verification. The technical file shall include at least the information indicated in
Art.18 (3) of the Directives, and in particular as follows:
— all necessary documents relating to the characteristics of the subsystem
— the list of interoperability constituents incorporated into the subsystem,
(25) In particular, for the rolling stock TSI, the notified body will participate in the final in service
testing of rolling stock or train set. This will be indicated in the relevant chapter of the TSI.
— copies of the EC declarations of conformity and, where appropriate, of the EC declarations of
suitability for use, which the constituents shall be provided in accordance with Article 13 of the
Directive, accompanied, where appropriate, by the corresponding documents (certificates, quality
management system approvals and surveillance documents) issued by the notified bodies,
— all elements relating to the maintenance, the conditions and limits for use of the subsystem,
— all elements relating to the instructions concerning servicing, constant or routine monitoring,
adjustment and maintenance,
— the type-examination certificate for the subsystem and accompanying technical documentation,
as defined in the module SB
— certificate of conformity of the notified body as mentioned in point 9, accompanied
bycorresponding calculation notes and countersigned by itself, stating that the project complies with
the directive and the TSI, and mentioning, where appropriate, reservations recorded during
performance of activities and not withdrawn. The certificate should also be accompanied, if relevant,
by the inspection and audit reports drawn up in connection with the verification.
11. The records accompanying the certificate of conformity shall be lodged with the contracting
entity. The contracting entity shall keep a copy of the technical file throughout the service life of the
subsystem and for a further period of three years; it shall be sent to any other Member State which
so requests.
F.3.4. Module SG: Unit verification
at the request of an contracting entity or its authorised representative established within the
Community, that an infrastructure or rolling stock subsystem
- 404 -
— complies with the other regulations deriving from the Treaty, and may be placed in service.
2. The contracting entity (27) shall lodge an application for EC verification (through unit verification)
of the subsystem with a notified body of his choice.
— name and address of the contracting entity or its authorised representative
— the technical documentation.
3. The technical documentation shall enable the design, manufacture, installation and operation of
the subsystem to be understood, and shall enable conformity assessment with the requirements of
the TSI.
The technical documentation shall include:
— a general description of the subsystem, its overall design and structure,
components, sub-assemblies, assemblies, circuits, etc.,
— descriptions and explanations necessary for the understanding of the design and manufacturing
information, the maintenance and the operation of the subsystem,
— the technical specifications, including European specifications (28), that have been applied,
European specifications and the relevant clauses have not been applied in full,
— copies of the EC declarations of conformity or suitability for use with which said constituents shall
— evidence of conformity with other regulations deriving from the treaty (including certificates)
— technical documentation regarding the manufacture and the assembly of the subsystem,
— a list of manufacturers involved in the subsystem's design, manufacturing, assembly and
installation, — conditions for use of the subsystem (restrictions of running time or distance, wear
limits etc),
— conditions for maintenance and technical documentation regarding the maintenance of
thesubsystem,
— any technical requirement that shall be taken into account during production, maintenance
oroperation of the subsystem,
— results of design calculations made, examinations carried out, etc.,
— all other appropriate technical evidences, which can demonstrate that previous checking or tests
have been successfully performed, under comparable conditions, by independent and competent
bodies If the TSI requires further information for the technical documentation, this shall be included.
- 405 -
4. The notified body shall examine the application and the technical documentation, and identify the
elements which have been designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the TSI and the
European specifications, as well as the elements which have been designed without applying the
relevant provisions of those European specifications.
The notified body shall examine the subsystem and verify that the appropriate and necessary tests to
establish whether, where the relevant European specifications have been chosen, these have
actually been applied or whether the solutions adopted meet the requirements of the TSI when the
appropriate European specifications have not been applied.
The examinations, tests and checks shall extend to the following stages as provided for in the TSI:
— overall design
— structure of the subsystem, including, in particular and when relevant, civil-engineering activities,
constituent assembly, overall adjustments
— final testing of the subsystem
— and, whenever specified in the TSI, the validation under full operational conditions.
The notified body may take into account evidence of examinations, checking or tests that have been
successfully performed, under comparable conditions by other bodies (29) or by (or on the behalf of)
the applicant, when this is specified by the relevant TSI. The notified body will then decide as to
whether it shall use the results of these checks or tests.
(28) The definition of a European specification is indicated in the directives 96/48/EC and 01/16/EC.
The guide for application of HS TSIs explains the way to use the European Specifications.
(29) The conditions to entrust checking and tests must be similar than the conditions, respected by a
notified body to subcontract activities (see § 6.5 of the Blue Guide on the New Approach).
The evidences gathered by the notified body shall be suitable and sufficient to show the conformity
with the requirement of the TSI and that all required and appropriate checks and tests have been
carried out.
Any evidence to be used that originates from other parties shall be considered prior to any tests or
checks being carried out, since the notified body may wish to undertake any assessment, witnessing
or review of the tests or checks at the time they are performed.
The extent of such other evidence shall be justified by documented analysis using, among others, the
factors listed below (30). This justification shall be included in the technical file.In all case the notified
body keeps the final responsibility of them.
5. The notified body shall agree with the contracting entity the locations where the tests will be
carried out and shall agree that final subsystem tests and, whenever required in the TSI, tests in full
operating conditions, are carried out by the contracting entity under direct supervision and
attendance of the notified body.
6. The notified body shall have entrance for testing and verification purposes to the locations of
design, building sites, production workshops, locations of assembly and installations, and where
appropriate, prefabrication and testing facilities in order to carry out its tasks as provided for in the
TSI.
7. Where the subsystem meets the requirements of the TSI, the notified body shall then, based on
the tests, verifications and checks carried out as required in the TSI and/or in the relevant European
specifications, draw up the certificate of conformity intended for the contracting entity, who shall in
turn draw up the EC declaration of verification intended for the supervisory authority in the Member
State where the subsystem is located and/or operates.
- 406 -
declaration shall be written in the same language as the technical file and shall contain at least the
8. The notified body shall be responsible for compiling the technical file that has to accompany the
EC declaration of verification. The technical file has to include at least the information indicated in
Art.18 (3) of the Directive, and in particular as follows:
— copies of the EC declarations of conformity and, where appropriate, of the EC declarations
ofsuitability for use, which the constituents shall be provided in accordance with Article 13 of
theDirective, accompanied, where appropriate, by the corresponding documents (certificates, quality
— all elements relating to the instructions concerning servicing, constant or routine
monitoring,adjustment and maintenance,
(30) The notified body shall investigate the various parts of the subsystem work and establish
before, during and on completion of the work:
— the risk and safety implications of the subsystem and its various parts
— the use of existing equipment and systems:
— used identically as before
— used before but adapted for use in the new work
— the use of existing designs, technologies, materials and production techniques.
— the arrangements for design, production, testing and commissioning
— the operational and service duty
— previous approvals from other competent bodies
— the accreditations of other involved bodies:
— it is permissible for the nb to take account of valid accreditation to EN45004, providing that no
conflict of interest exists, that accreditation covers the testing being performed and that
accreditation is current.
— where no formal accreditation exists, the nb shall confirm that the systems for control of
competence, independence, testing and material handling processes, facilities and equipment and
other processes relevant to the contribution to the subsystem are controlled.
— in all cases, the notified body shall consider the appropriateness of the arrangements and decide
the level of witnessing required
— the use of homogenous lots and systems consistent with module f.
— certificate of conformity of the notified body as mentioned in point 7, accompanied by verification
and/or corresponding calculation notes and countersigned by itself, stating that the project complies
with the directive and the TSI, and mentioning, where appropriate, reservations recorded during
performance of activities and not withdrawn; the certificate should also be accompanied, if relevant,
by the inspection and audit reports drawn up in connection with the verification,
— evidence of conformity with other regulations deriving from the treaty (including certificates)
— the infrastructure or rolling stock register, including all information as specified in the TSI.
- 407 -
9. The records accompanying the certificate of conformity shall be lodged with the contracting entity
The contracting entity shall keep a copy of the technical file throughout the service life of the
so requests.
F.3.5. Module SH2: Full Quality Management System with Design Examination
at therequest of an contracting entity or its authorised representative established within the
Community, that an infrastructure or rolling stock subsystem
requirements (31) of Directive 01/16/EC have been met;
— complies with the other regulations deriving from the Treaty and may be placed in service
2. The notified body shall carry out the procedure, including a design examination of the subsystem,
under the condition, that the contracting entity (32) and the main contractor involved are satisfying
the obligations of point 3.
The ‘main contractor’ refers to companies, whose activities contribute to fulfil the essential
requirements of the TSI. It concerns the company:
— responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in particular responsibility for subsystem
integration),
— other companies involved only in a part of the subsystem project (performing for example design,
assembly or installation of the subsystem).
It does not refer to manufacturer sub contractors supplying components and interoperability
constituents.
3. For the subsystem that is subject of the EC verification procedure, the contracting entity or the
main contractor, when employed, shall operate an approved quality management system for design,
manufacture and final product inspection and testing as specified in point 5 and which shall be
subject to surveillance as specified in point 6
The main contractor responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in particular
responsibility for subsystem integration), shall operate in any case an approved quality management
system for design, manufacture and final product inspection and testing, which shall be subject to
surveillance as specified in point 6. In the case that the contracting entity itself is responsible for the
whole subsystem project (including in particular responsibility for subsystem integration) or that the
contracting entity is directly involved in the design and/or production (including assembly and
installation), it shall operate an approved qualitymanagement system for those activities, which shall
be subject to surveillance as specified in point 6. Applicants which are only involved in assembly and
installation, are permitted to operate only an approved quality management system for manufacture
and final product inspection and testing
4. EC verification procedure
4.1. The contracting entity shall lodge an application for EC verification of the subsystem (through full
quality management system with design examination), including co ordination of surveillance of the
quality management systems as in points 5.4. and 6.6., with a notified body of its choice. The
contracting entity shall inform the manufacturers involved of his choice and of the application.
4.2. The application shall enable the design, manufacture, assembly, installation, maintenance and
operation of the subsystem to be understood, and shall enable conformity with the requirements of
the TSI to be assessed.
— name and address of the contracting entity or its authorised representative,
- 408 -
— the technical documentation including:

— the technical design specifications, including European specifications (33), that have beenapplied,
— any necessary supporting evidence for the use of the above specifications, in particular where the
European specificationsand the relevant clauses have not been applied in full,
— the test programme,
— the technical documentation regarding the manufacture, the assembly of the subsystem,
— copies of the EC declarations of conformity or suitability for use with which the constituentsshall
— evidence of conformity to other regulations deriving from the treaty (including certificates),
— a list of all manufacturers, involved in the subsystem's design, manufacturing, assembly
andinstallation,
— conditions for use of the subsystem (restrictions of running time or distance, wear limits etc),
— conditions for maintenance and technical documentation regarding the maintenance of
thesubsystem,
— any technical requirement that shall be taken into account during production, maintenance or
operation of the subsystem,
— the explanation, of how all stages, as mentioned in point 5.2, are covered by quality management
systems of the main contractor and/or of the contracting entity, if involved, and the evidence of their
effectiveness,
— indication of the notified body (ies) responsible for the approval and surveillance of these quality
management systems.
4.3. The contracting entity shall present the results of examinations, checking and tests (34) including
type testswhen required, carried out by its appropriate laboratory or on their behalf.
(33) The definition of an European specification is indicated in the directives 96/48/EC and 01/16/EC.
The guide for application of HS TSIsexplains the way to use the European Specifications.
(34) The presentation of the results of the tests can be at the same time as the application or later.
4.4. The notified body shall examine the application concerning the design examination and assess
the results of the tests. Where the design meets the provisions of the Directive and of the TSI that
apply to it shall issue a design examination certificate to the applicant. The certificate shall contain
the conclusions of the design examination, conditions for its validity, the necessary data for
identification of the design examined and, if relevant, a description of the subsystem's functioning. If
the contracting entity is denied a design examination certificate, the notified body shall provide
detailed reasons for such denial. Provision shall be made for an appeals procedure.
4.5. During the production phase, the applicant shall inform the notified body that holds the
technicaldocumentation concerning the design examination certificate of all modifications which
may affect the conformity with the requirements of the TSI or the prescribed conditions for use of
the subsystem. The subsystem shall receive additional approval in such cases. In this case, the
notified body shall perform only those examinations and tests, those are relevant and necessary to
the changes. This additional approval may be given either in the form of an addition to the original
design examination certificate, or by issue of a new certificate after withdrawal of the old certificate.
5. Quality management system
- 409 -
5.1. The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractor, when employed, shall lodge an
application for assessment of their quality management systems with a notified body of their choice.
— all relevant information for the subsystem envisaged,
— the quality management system documentation.
For those only involved in a part of the subsystem project, the information to be provided is only that
for the relevant part.
5.2. For the contracting entity or the main contractor responsible for the whole subsystem project,
the quality management system shall ensure overall compliance of the subsystem with the
requirements of the TSI.
The quality management system(s), for other contractors, has (have) to ensure compliance of their
relevant contribution to the subsystem, with the requirements of the TSI.
All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the applicants shall be documented in a
systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. This
quality management system documentation shall ensure a common understanding of the quality
policies and procedures such as quality programmes, plans, manuals and records.
The system shall contain in particular an adequate description of the following items:
— for all applicants:
— the quality objectives and the organisational structure,
— the corresponding manufacturing, quality control and quality management techniques,processes
and systematic actions that will be used,
— the examinations, checking and tests that will be carried out before, during and after
design,manufacture, assembly and installation and the frequency with which they will be carried out,
— the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualificationreports
of the personnel concerned, etc.,
— for the main contractor, as far as relevant for its contribution to the design of the subsystem:
— the technical design specifications, including European specifications that will be applied and,
where the European specifications will not be applied in full, the means that will be used to ensure
that the requirements of the TSI that apply to the subsystem will be met,
— the design control and design verification techniques, processes and systematic actions that will
be used when designing the subsystem,
— the means to monitor the achievement of the required design and subsystem quality and
theeffective operation of the quality management systems in all phases including production.
— and also for the contracting entity or the main contractor responsible for the whole subsystem
project:
— responsibilities and powers of the management with regard to overall subsystem quality,including
in particular the subsystem integration management.
The examinations, tests and checking shall cover all of the following stages:
— overall design,
— structure of the subsystem, including, in particular, civil-engineering activities, constituent
assembly, final adjustment,
— final testing of the subsystem,
— and, where specified in the TSI, the validation under full operation conditions.
- 410 -
5.3. The notified body chosen by the contracting entity shall examine, if all stages of the subsystem
as mentioned in point 5.2 are sufficiently and properly covered by the approval and surveillance of
the quality management system(s) of the applicant(s) (35).
If the compliance of the subsystem with the requirements of the TSI is based on more than one
quality management system, the notified body shall examine in particular,
— if the relations and interfaces between the quality management systems are clearly documented
— and if overall responsibilities and powers of the management for the compliance of the whole
entire subsystem for the main contractor are sufficiently and properly defined.
5.4. The notified body referenced in point 5.1. shall assess the quality management system to
determine whether it satisfies the requirements of point 5.2. It presumes compliance with these
requirements if the applicant implements a quality system for design, production, final product
inspection and testing in respect of the Standard EN/ISO 9001-2000, which takes into consideration
the specificity of the subsystem for which it is implemented.
When an applicant operates a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this
into account in the assessment.
The audit shall be specific for the subsystem concerned, taking into consideration the specific
contribution of the applicant to the subsystem. The auditing team shall have at least one member
experienced as an assessor in the subsystem technology concerned. The evaluation procedure shall
include an assessment visit to the applicant's premises.
The decision shall be notified to the applicant. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the
examination and the reasoned assessment decision.
5.5. The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractor shall undertake to fulfil the
obligations arising out of the quality management system as approved and to uphold it so that it
remains adequate and efficient.
(35) In particular, for the rolling stock TSI, the notified body will participate in the final in service
testing of rolling stock or train set. This will be indicated in the relevant chapter of the TSI. They shall
keep the notified body that has approved their quality management system informed of any
significant change that will affect the fulfilment of the requirements by the subsystem. The notified
body shall evaluate any modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality
management system will still satisfy the requirements of point 5.2 or whether a re-assessment is
required.
It shall notify its decision to the applicant. The notification shall contain the conclusions of
theexamination and the reasoned assessment decision.
6. Surveillance of the quality management system(s) under the responsibility of the notified body
6.1. The purpose of surveillance is to make sure that the contracting entity, if involved, and the main
contractor duly fulfil the obligations arising out of the approved quality management system(s).
6.2. The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractor shall send the notified body
referenced in point 5.1. (or have sent) all the documents needed for that purpose and in particular
the implementation plans and technical records concerning the subsystem (as far as relevant for the
specific contribution of the applicant to the subsystem), including:
— the quality management system documentation, including the particular means implemented to
ensure that
— for the contracting entity or the main contractor, responsible for the whole subsystem project,
overall responsibilities and powers of the management for the compliance of the whole entire
subsystem are sufficiently and properly defined,
- 411 -
— for each applicant,the quality management system is correctly managed for achieving integration
at subsystemlevel,
— the quality records as foreseen by the design part of the quality management system, such as
results of analyses, calculations, tests, etc.,
— the quality records as foreseen by the manufacturing part (including assembly, installation and
integration) of the quality management system, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration
data, competency records of the personnel concerned, etc.
6.3. The notified body shall periodically carry out audits to make sure that the contracting entity, if
involved, and the main contractor maintain and apply the quality management system and shall
provide an audit report to them. When they operate a certified quality management system, the
notified body shall take this into account in the surveillance. The frequency of the audits shall be at
least once a year, with at least one audit during the time period of performing the relevant activities
(design, manufacture, assembly or installation) for the subsystem beingthe subject of the EC
verification procedure mentioned in point 4.
6.4. Additionally the notified body may pay unexpected visits to the sites mentioned in point 5.2 of
the applicant(s). At the time of such visits, the notified body may conduct complete or partial audits
and may carry out or cause to be carried out tests in order to check the proper functioning of the
quality management system where necessary. It shall provide the applicant(s) with an inspection
report and audit and/or test reports as appropriate.
6.5. The notified body chosen by the contracting entity and responsible for the EC verification, if not
carrying out the surveillance of all the quality management system(s) concerned as under point 5,
shall co ordinate the surveillance activities of any other notified bodies responsible for that task, in
order:
— to be ensured that correct management of interfaces between the different quality management
systems relating to subsystem integration has been performed.
— to collect, in liaison with the contracting entity, the necessary elements for the assessment to
guarantee the consistency and the overall supervision of the different quality management systems.
This co ordination includes the right of the notified body
— to receive all documentation (approval and surveillance), issued by the other notified body(s),
— to witness the surveillance audits as in point 5.4.,
— to initiate additional audits as in point 5.5. under its responsibility and together with the other
notified body(s).
7. The notified body as referenced under point 5.1. shall have entrance for inspection purposes, audit
and surveillance to the locations of design, building sites, production workshops, locations of
assembly and installation, storage areas and where appropriate, prefabrication or testing facilities
and, more general, to all premises which it considers necessary for its task, in accordance with the
applicant's specific contribution to the subsystem project.
8. The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractor shall, for a period of 10 years after the
last subsystem has been manufactured, keep at the disposal of the national authorities:
— the documentation referenced in the second indent of the second subparagraph of point 5.1,
— the updating referenced in the second subparagraph of point 5.5,
— the decisions and reports from the notified body which are referenced in the points 5.4, 5.5 and
6.4
9. Where the subsystem meets the requirements of the TSI, the notified body shall then, based on
the design examination and the approval and surveillance of the quality management system(s),
draw up the certificate of conformity intended for the contracting entity, who shall in turn draw up
- 412 -
the EC declaration of verification intended for the supervisory authority in the Member State within
which the subsystem is located and/or operates.
declaration shall be written in the same language of the technical file and shall contain at least the
10. The notified body chosen by the contracting entity shall be responsible for compiling the
technical file that has to accompany the EC declaration of verification. The technical file shall include
at least the information indicated in Art 18 (3) of The Directive, and in particular as follows:
— copies of the EC declarations of conformity and, where appropriate, of the EC declarations of
suitability for use, which the constituents shall be provided in accordance with Article 13 of the
Directive, accompanied, where appropriate, by the corresponding documents (certificates, quality
— evidence of conformity to other regulations deriving from the treaty (including certificates)
— all elements relating to the instructions concerning servicing, constant or routine
monitoring,adjustment and maintenance
— certificate of conformity of the notified body as mentioned under point 9, accompanied
bycorresponding verification and/or calculation notes and countersigned by itself, stating that the
project complies with the Directive and the TSI, and mentioning, where appropriate, reservations
recorded during performance of the activities and not withdrawn.
The certificate should also be accompanied, if relevant, by the inspection and audit reports drawn up
in connection with the verification, as mentioned in points 6.4. and 6.5.;
— the infrastructure or rolling stock register, including all information as specified in the TSI.
11. Each notified body shall communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information
concerning the quality management system approvals and the EC design examination certificates,
which it has issued, withdrawn or refused.
The other notified bodies may receive on request copies of:
— the quality management system approvals and additional approvals issued and
— the EC design examination certificates and additions issued
12. The records accompanying the certificate of conformity shall be lodged with the contracting
entity .The contracting entity shall keep a copy of the technical file throughout the service life of the
so requests.
- 413 -
ANNEX I
CEBC Report updated data 2011
Table I.1 - CEBC Report 2007 – updated data 2011 (partial – where data have been available)
England & Wales
Northern Ireland
Slovak Republic
Czech Republic
Netherlands
Luxemburg
Type Topic
Lithuania
Germany
Denmark
Romania
Scotland
Slovenia
Belgium
Sweden
Norway
Finland
Estonia
Croatia
Iceland
Austria
Ireland
Greece
Poland
Cyprus
France
Latvia
Spain
Italy
Non- Is disabled access
domestic covered by yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
legislation?
Non- Is disabled access a
domestic Building Regulation yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
matter?
Non- Are the Regulations
domestic performance based?
partly
partly
partly
no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes
Non- Is there supporting

yes no yes no no yes yes no no no yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes
domestic technical guidance?
Non- Do the Regulations
domestic apply to non- yes no no yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
dwellings?
domestic apply to extensions
yes no no yes no yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
as well as new
buildings?
domestic apply to approach
partly
to the building? yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
- 414 -
England & Wales
Northern Ireland
Slovak Republic
Czech Republic
Netherlands
Luxemburg
Type Topic
Lithuania
Germany
Denmark
Romania
Scotland
Slovenia
Belgium
Sweden
Norway
Finland
Estonia
Croatia
Iceland
Austria
Ireland
Greece
Poland
Cyprus
France
Latvia
Spain
Italy
Non- Are maximum
domestic gradients to
yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
external ramps
specified?
domestic apply to external
partly
stairways? yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes

domestic apply to minimum
yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
width of entrance
doors?
domestic stipulate automatic
partly
partly
doors at entrances? yes yes no no no no no no no no no no no no no no yes no no no no no no

domestic control visibility of yes yes yes no yes no yes no no yes yes no yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes
large glazed areas?
Non- Are reception areas
domestic and lobbies
partly
partly
controlled by the yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes no yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes no yes yes no
Regulations?

domestic control widths of
corridors and yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes no yes yes
hallways?
- 415 -
England & Wales
Northern Ireland
Slovak Republic
Czech Republic
Netherlands
Luxemburg
Type Topic
Lithuania
Germany
Denmark
Romania
Scotland
Slovenia
Belgium
Sweden
Norway
Finland
Estonia
Croatia
Iceland
Austria
Ireland
Greece
Poland
Cyprus
France
Latvia
Spain
Italy
domestic control internal yes yes yes no yes yes yes no no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
door widths?
domestic control the gradient yes yes yes no yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
of internal ramps?
domestic control internal yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
stairs?
Non- Are passenger lifts
domestic required by the
partly
partly
Regulations? yes yes yes no yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
Non- Min no of storeys

3 5 3 3 2 2 0 5 2 3 2
domestic
Non- Can platform lifts
domestic and stairlifts be
yes yes yes no yes no yes no yes no no yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
considered as an
alternative?
domestic require toilets for yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
the disabled?
domestic control the
colour/contrast of yes no yes no no no yes yes no yes yes no yes yes yes yes no yes yes no yes no yes no yes
internal surfaces?
domestic require low level
counters etc at no yes yes no yes no yes no yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes no yes yes no yes no yes yes no
reception areas?
- 416 -
England & Wales
Northern Ireland
Slovak Republic
Czech Republic
Netherlands
Luxemburg
Type Topic
Lithuania
Germany
Denmark
Romania
Scotland
Slovenia
Belgium
Sweden
Norway
Finland
Estonia
Croatia
Iceland
Austria
Ireland
Greece
Poland
Cyprus
France
Latvia
Spain
Italy
Non- Are induction loops
domestic required for the
partly
deaf? no yes no yes no yes no yes yes no yes yes no yes no no yes yes no yes yes yes yes no
Non- Are wayfinding signs

domestic required?
partly
no yes no yes no yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes no yes yes no no yes yes yes yes
Non- Is artificial lighting

domestic controlled by the
partly
Regulations? yes no yes no no yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes no no no yes yes no no yes yes yes
Non- Is means of escape

domestic in case of fire for
partly
disabled people yes no yes no yes no no no yes no no yes no no no no no yes no no no yes yes no
controlled?
Non- Are building

domestic management action
plans accepted with yes no yes no yes no yes yes no yes no no yes yes no no no yes yes no yes no yes no no
trade off for alarms,
refuges etc?
Dwellings Is disabled access
covered by yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
legislation?
Dwellings Is disabled access
a Building
yes no yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
Regulation
matter?
- 417 -
England & Wales
Northern Ireland
Slovak Republic
Czech Republic
Netherlands
Luxemburg
Type Topic
Lithuania
Germany
Denmark
Romania
Scotland
Slovenia
Belgium
Sweden
Norway
Finland
Estonia
Croatia
Iceland
Austria
Ireland
Greece
Poland
Cyprus
France
Latvia
Spain
Italy
Dwellings Are the
Regulations
partly
partly
partly
performance no yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes
based?
Dwellings Is there supporting

technical yes no yes no no yes yes no no no yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
guidance?
Dwellings Do the
Regulations apply
partly
to dwellings? yes yes no yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
Dwellings Do the
Regulations apply
partly
to extensions as yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
well as new
buildings?
Dwellings Do the
Regulations apply
yes yes no yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
to approach to the
building?
Dwellings Are maximum
gradients to
yes yes no yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
external ramps
specified?
Dwellings Do the
Regulations apply
yes yes no yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no
to external
stairways?
- 418 -
England & Wales
Northern Ireland
Slovak Republic
Czech Republic
Netherlands
Luxemburg
Type Topic
Lithuania
Germany
Denmark
Romania
Scotland
Slovenia
Belgium
Sweden
Norway
Finland
Estonia
Croatia
Iceland
Austria
Ireland
Greece
Poland
Cyprus
France
Latvia
Spain
Italy
Dwellings Do the
Regulations apply
to minimum width yes yes no yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
of entrance doors?
Dwellings Do the
Regulations
partly
control visibility of yes yes no no no no no no no yes yes no yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes no yes yes yes
large glazed
areas?
Dwellings Do the
Regulations
partly
control widths of yes yes no yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no no yes yes
corridors and
hallways?
Dwellings Do the
Regulations
yes yes no no yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes
control internal
door widths?
Dwellings Do the
Regulations
partly
control the yes yes no no yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes
gradient of internal
ramps?
Dwellings Do the
Regulations
yes yes no yes yes yes yes no yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
control internal
stairs?
Dwellings Are passenger lifts
required by the
partly
Regulations? yes yes no no yes yes no no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
- 419 -
England & Wales
Northern Ireland
Slovak Republic
Czech Republic
Netherlands
Luxemburg
Type Topic
Lithuania
Germany
Denmark
Romania
Scotland
Slovenia
Belgium
Sweden
Norway
Finland
Estonia
Croatia
Iceland
Austria
Ireland
Greece
Poland
Cyprus
France
Latvia
Spain
Italy
Dwellings Min no of storeys 3 5 3 3 3 6 4 4 3 3 5 5 5 3 3
Dwellings Can platform lifts
and stairlifts be
yes yes no no yes no no no yes no no yes no yes no yes no no yes no no yes yes yes yes
considered as an
alternative?
Dwellings Do the
Regulations
require toilets yes yes no yes yes no yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes no no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
fordisabledpeople
?
Dwellings Do the
Regulations
control the yes no no no no no no no no no yes no no yes yes yes no no yes no no yes yes no no
colour/contrast of
internal surfaces?
COE data Legislation on

UD/DFA
partly
yes no no yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes
COE data Disability

Discrimination Act yes no yes no yes no yes yes yes no yes yes no
COE data National

monitoring system
partly
on UD yes no no yes no no yes no no no no
- 420 -
England & Wales
Northern Ireland
Slovak Republic
Czech Republic
Netherlands
Luxemburg
Type Topic
Lithuania
Germany
Denmark
Romania
Scotland
Slovenia
Belgium
Sweden
Norway
Finland
Estonia
Croatia
Iceland
Austria
Ireland
Greece
Poland
Cyprus
France
Latvia
Spain
Italy
COE data Awareness
programmes on
partly
partly
UD/DFA no yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes
COE data Public

procurement
partly
partly
partly
policies include no yes no yes yes no no yes yes
UD/DFA
COE data UD in built

environment
partly
partly
partly
partly
partly
education curricula yes yes yes yes no yes yes
COE data Labelling system

on UD/DFA
partly
no no yes yes no no yes yes yes yes yes
BCA CAS BCA certification

only
BCA CAS Accessibility
training required
for BCA staff
BCA CAS Comments to BCA
procedures
BCA CAS First party/Self-
certification exists yes no no yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes no no yes yes yes yes no yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes
BCA CAS Whole building

design self- yes yes no yes yes no yes no yes no yes yes no yes no yes yes
assessable
- 421 -
Type
BCA CAS
BCA CAS
BCA CAS
BCA CAS
Topic
permitted
Municipal
assessment
of completion
Qualifications
CEN/BT WG 207 Joint Report
Who can certify

self-assessment
required for self-
Self-assessment
inspection besides
completion in case
of self-assessment
freelance civil
no
no
Austria
yes
engineer
no
Belgium
no
Croatia
Supervisor
no
Cyprus
yes
engineer
no
Czech Republic
yes yes
random partly Denmark
yes
no
no
England & Wales
partly
no
Estonia
no
no
Finland
yes
M&E Contractor
no
no
no
France
houses
no
Germany
- 422 -
Greece
no
Iceland
no
no
Ireland
no
Italy
See sheet partly Latvia

yes
yes
no
Lithuania
Luxemburg
no
no
Netherlands
yes
no
Northern Ireland
no
Norway
Spot checks
no
Poland
yes yes
Romania
Relevant person
no
Scotland
yes
yes
Authority
no
no
Slovak Republic
no
Slovenia
Can inspect
no
Spain
Quality assurance Random

no
Sweden
yes yes yes
2011-08-08
ANNEX J
Education and training of architects, public procurers, construction engineers etc.
J.1 Education and training in EU Member States
In most of the countries, basic education does not contain any obligatory training on accessibility of
the built environment for architects, engineers, technicians, professionals, and authorities involved in
public procurement, execution and supervision. Exceptions are Hungary, Malta, Poland and Slowakia.
In Hungary the issue is dealt with in student design projects. Thus, all subjects should contain an
accessibility related part. In Malta accessibility issues are part of the general design education.
In Poland the universal design approach is promoted and all relevant requirements are taught at a
higher education level in many design schools (architectural design, industrial design). All design
courses require implementation of universal design as stated in the building regulation. Another
approach is provided in the UK, where Inclusive Design education is introduced at primary and
secondary school levels in order to inform designers of the future.
In Slovakia design for all courses are implemented obligatorily in the curricula for architects. In 2008
VUT Bratislava has organised for a two weeks course one Erasmus Intensive Programme “Tourism for
all” and in 2009 followed by “Culture for all” where each time 20 architecture students and their
teachers of different European universities of technology participated (Austria as co-partner,
Belgium, Czech Republic, Germany, Poland).
Some countries provide post-graduate studies for architects as well as for other professional groups.
For example, in Hungary at the Budapest University of Technology Economics’ Faculty of Architecture
a Rehabilitation Engineering Programme has been accredited eight years ago. So called
“Rehabilitation engineers” receive a two-year training. Since 2006 a lecture and project work on
“Universal Design” is introduced in the Facility Management MBA Programme and since this year
also in the post-graduate course “Sustainable built environment” at the Vienna University of
Technology.
To conclude, there are several offers for voluntary training available in many of the countries, but the
awareness of the importance of getting trained in terms of accessibility among the professionals
concerned leaves a lot to be desired. In some countries there are no such offers at all available and
there seems to be a lack of experts in this field in most of the countries.
J.2 Good practice examples for education in Europe
Chamber of architects in Berlin: Training course for certified experts on accessiblity with 126 hours
in 2 day courses with 9 units
Handwerkskammer Hamburg: courses for carpenter, plumbers etc.
DIN: courses for architects and engineers on accessibility
Chamber of Architects in Madrid (COAM): Universal Accessibility and Design for all course with 45
hours, architectural students can also attend this course; no fees!
Technical University of Bratsilava: CEDA (Centre of Excellence in Design for All, founded 2007) with
partner Vienna University of Technology offerst two Erasmus Intensive Programmes on “Tourism for
all” and “Culture for all” in 2008 and 2009.
Austrian Standards Training plus: starts 2011 a course for “Certified Experts on Accessibility” with
48 hours; final project work and testing
Vienna University of Technology:
MBA Facility Management: Universal Design included with facility check on accessibility of an
existing office building; since 2008
Training course on “Sustainability of the built Environment” where Universal Design is included in
the course with 4 hours; since autumn 2010 in co-operation with Graz University of Technology
- 423 -
J.3 Low level of expertise on accessibility among architects, engineers and public procurers
We must remember the low level of expertise on accessibility in the vast majority of public procurers
but also among architects and construction engineers. Therefore to guarantee the appointment of
experts in this field for the calls preparation and the evaluation of the projects/works/products
delivered by the provider is a must.
In 2001 the Council of Europe with the Committee of Ministers has adopted Resolution ResAP
(2001)1 “Universal Design” on the introduction of the principles of universal design into the curricula
of all occupations working on the built environment:
https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=186495&BackColourInternet=B9BDEE&BackCol.
Has this resolution been introduced in European universities, technical colleges etc. sufficiently –
or is here a Missing Link?
The recent study of design for all “Barrierefreies Bauen – Ausbildung und Beratung in
Österreich”25includes the result of an English online survey among all European technical universities
who participate in the Schindler Award.
More than 300 technical colleges and universities in Europe have been asked in which amount and in
which phase of the education of architects Universal Design / Design for all / Inclusive Design is
included in the curricula.
The return rate with 8, 4 % - received after twice reminders - has been rather disappointing. 28
universities from Turkey to Portugal, from Greece to Finland have answered the questionnaire:
The answers have been very opposite: some universities have integrated the content of Design
for all in the different design studios. Others make specific DfA courses combined with special
design projects. In 4 universities DfA is educated from the very beginning, 10 universities start
in the second or third year and 7 universities in the master studies. Some courses are also under
preparation.
Three courses have been established in the early 1990 one even earlier in 1965 at Vienna
Technical University, the most courses in the last 10 years with a large range of 4 to 162 hours.
6 from 28 universities are active involved in the implementation of the UN Convention and will
focus more on Design for all education in their architectural curricula.
See here some comments what should be the goal of all architectural education:
Our long-term experience gives the same poor result as the recent study has shown although not
with a representative return rate. Currently, Universal Design/Design for All/Inclusive Design is hardly
introduced at all within architects’ curricula. In some cases, students have the possibility to take
25
see www.designforall.at – free download mainly in German
- 424 -
facultative courses. In order to educate a generation of architects capable of dealing with

accessibility issues, appropriate courses should be compulsory for students.
J.4 Recommendation for education and training of architects, public procurers etc.
Member States should be made aware about this missing link and the missing implementation of the
Universal Design Resolution from 2001. This has an important influence on the implementation of
Design for all approach within the built environment.
Following the same argument, as in the previous point (although the better education of architects
and engineers in accessibility is clearly desirable), the amount of knowledge needed to achieve good
results requires certain degree of specialisation. Companies such as ARUP have experts to check the
development in the UK and other countries. The access consultant is a profession well defined and
with clear commitments in the projection, design, construction and inspection processes).
That is a similar approach that is used for structures calculation, building physics, fire safety
engineering or electrical installations. Therefore we would suggest including in future procurement
standards the need to involve access consultants (as personnel of the procurer administration to
contribute in the call preparation, awarding and assessment but also being part of the providers staff
to guarantee the requested accessibility quality level).
- 425 -

Cen Joint Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cen Joint Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cen Joint Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CEN/BT WG 207 Joint Report 2011-08-08

Secretariat AENOR For discussion

Draft Joint Report - CEN/BT WG 207 (PT A and PT B)

o Team B: Analysis of European and International accessibility

Please send feedback to PTA leader, Ms Monika Klenovec (teama_m420@yahoo.com)

4.2.3 Functional model of conformity assessment.................................................................... 74

3 Team A – Production of an inventory, comparing the existing European and

Figure 1 – Totality of countries – Spreadsheets Inventory

Figure 2 – Totality of countries – Country Reports Inventory

- CEN/TR 14383-2 “Prevention of crime – urban planning and building design”

specific accessible products with some exceptions mentioned below.

CEN/TC 169 “Lighting”

3.3 Analysis of gaps

Table 1 – Number of general legislation, building code, technical regulations, standards

Type GENERAL TECHNICAL

3.3.1.5 Coverage of internal environments, all documents

3.3.1.10 Estimate on potential suitability in public procurement

with unequal approach in regions, countries, cantons and communities

Type 2 Building regulation with

Buidling regulation only

Regulation with guidance

Standard only partly applied R

People using a wheelchair c c c c c c c c p c c c c c c p c c c p c c c c c

3.3.3.1 Comments on coverage of User Needs

Nevertheless, we have a range of different approaches regarding legislation on accessibility among

comprehensively covered partly covered not covered

Wheelchair walking dexterity vision hearing cognitive allergies age/stature

Figure 4 - Coverage of user needs in European countries

Disabled access covered by legislation? y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y

Disabled access a Building Regulation matter? y n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y

Regulations performance based? p n y p y y y y p y y y y y y y y y y y y y n y y y

Regulation applies to non-dwellings? y n n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y

Regulations apply to extensions as well as new buildings? y n n y n y y y y y n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y

Regulations apply to the approach to the building? y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y p y y y y y y y

Maximum gradients to external ramps specified? n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y

Regulations apply to external stairways? n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y n y y y y y y y y

Regulations apply to minimum width of entrance doors? n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y

Regulations control visibility of large glazed areas? n y y n y n y n n y y y n y y y y n y y y y n y y y

Regulations control widths of corridors and hallways? n y y y y y y n n y y y y y y y y y y y n y y n y y

Regulations control internal door widths? n y y n y y y n n y y y y y y y y n y y y y y y y y

Regulations control the gradient of internal ramps? y y y n y y y n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y

Regulations control internal stairs? y y y y y y y y y y n y y y y y y n y y y y y y y y

Regulations stipulate automatic doors at entrances? p y y n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n

Reception areas and lobbies controlled by Regulations? y y y y y y y n p y y y n n y y y n y y y y n y y n

Regulations require low level counters etc at reception areas? n y y n y n y n y y y y n n y y y n y n n y n y y n

Are induction loops required for the deaf p n y n y n y n y y n y n n y n n y y n y y y y n

Are wayfinding signs required? y n y n y n y y y y y y n n y y y n y y n n y y y y

Is artificial lighting controlled by the Regulations? y n y n p n y y n y y y y n y y n n n y y n n y y y

Is means of escape in case of fire for disabled people controlled? y n y n y p n n n y n p n y n n n n n y n n n y y n

Are building management action plans accepted with trade off

England & Wales

Disabled access a Building Regulation matter? y n y y y y y n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y

Regulations performance based? y n y y y y y n p y y y y y y y y y y y y y n y y y y

Regulation applies to dwellings? y y n y y y y n y y y y y y y y n y y y y y y y y y y

Regulations apply to existing as well as new buildings? y y n y y y y y y y n n y n y y y n y y y y y y y y y

Regulations apply to the approach to the building? y y n y y y y n y y y p y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y

Maximum gradients to external ramps specified? y y n y y y y n y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y

Regulations apply to external stairways? y y n y y y y n y y y n y y n y y n y y y y y y y n y

Regulations apply to minimum width of entrance doors? y y n y y y y n y y y p y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y

Regulations control visibility of large glazed areas? y y n n n n n n n y y n n n y y y n y y y y n y y y y