Eia Coastal Reclamation Fatumaru Bay
Eia Coastal Reclamation Fatumaru Bay
Eia Coastal Reclamation Fatumaru Bay
REPUBLIC OF VANUATU
November 2011
1|P ag e
Kawenu Cove Proposed Coastal Reclamation, Port Vila, Vanuatu – A Supplementary EIA Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………...4
1.1 Background………………………………………………………………………………….4
2|P ag e
Kawenu Cove Proposed Coastal Reclamation, Port Vila, Vanuatu – A Supplementary EIA Report
ABBREVIATIONS
ADB Asian Development Bank
3|P ag e
Kawenu Cove Proposed Coastal Reclamation, Port Vila, Vanuatu – A Supplementary EIA Report
1.INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
An Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIA) for a proposed coastal reclamation
by Terra Holdings Limited at Kawenu Cove, Fatumaru Bay was prepared by BECON in
September 2011. The EIA Report was submitted to DEPC in October 2011. The Review
Committee met on 4 November 2011 as per section 22 subsections (1) and (2) of the
Environmental Management and Conservation (Amendment) Act No 28 of 2010 and
section 12 (b) of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations Order No of 2011.
“The Director may, after receiving a recommendation from the review committee under
subsection (2) do the following:
(b) Refer the matter back to the EIA review committee for further assessment; or
The EIA review committee considered the EIA report at its meeting on 4 November,
2011, and submitted its comments to the Director of the DEPC for the Director to notify
the project proponent that further information is required for the EIA Report as per
section 22 subsection (3)(a). The Director notified the project proponent of the review
committee‟s comments (Annex 1) from its meeting held on 9 November 2011.
4|P ag e
Kawenu Cove Proposed Coastal Reclamation, Port Vila, Vanuatu – A Supplementary EIA Report
” In developing the terms of reference for the EIA, the Director must give special
consideration to the need for consultation, participation and involvement of custom
landowners, chiefs and other interested parties, and may consult with the National
Council of Chiefs for that purpose.”
The EIA Regulation Order No.of 2011 section 10 (1) to (4) refers to public consultations
for project proposals. The first public consultation for the proposed coastal reclamation
at Kawenu Cove, Fatumaru Bay was held at the Shefa Provincial Council on 29 October
2011. This follows a public notice published in the Daily Post in October 2011. The
minutes of the public consultation is attached as an Annex to this report. The names of
people who attended the consultation is also attached as Annex 3 to this report.
5|P ag e
Kawenu Cove Proposed Coastal Reclamation, Port Vila, Vanuatu – A Supplementary EIA Report
During a meeting held on 9 November 2011 between the project proponent, the
consultant and the Director of the DEPC, it was agreed that a second notice be served
through the Daily Post to the general public to submit comments/views on the proposed
development by 16 November 2011. The comments will be submitted directly to the
Director, DEPC and this will be complied to form part of the consultation process.
• Fisheries Act
In this section, each of the legislation is described and the agency responsible for their
implementation and the implications of each legislation on the proposed development. .
6|P ag e
Kawenu Cove Proposed Coastal Reclamation, Port Vila, Vanuatu – A Supplementary EIA Report
The Physical Planning Act provides urban development and planning control for
Vanuatu. Under the Act, a municipality or local government body may declare any area
under its jurisdiction to be a Physical Planning Area. The majority of the Port Vila Area
is administered by the Port Vila Municipal Council and this applies to the area being
proposed for reclamation. Any areas which have not been declared Physical Planning
Areas are not subject to planning and building controls. With the case of the proposed
development, the Foreshore Development must apply to ensure that the development
does not contribute to the pollution of the marine environment of Fatumaru Bay.
• any water flowing over to situated upon the surface of any land;
• water flowing over or contained in any river, stream, creek or other natural course for
water any lake, lagoon, bay swamp, marsh or spring whether or not it has been altered
or artificially improved;
• any groundwater;
• water at any time contained by works and any estuarine or coastal sea water. “Works”
is defined as any physical works related to the protection, management and use of
water and includes any storm water or wastewater works and their associated
construction activities
An examination of the above legislation indicates that this instrument provides some
legal authority for the management of urban governance in the area being proposed for
reclamation.
The Minister of Lands, Geology & Mines and Water Resources has the overall
responsibility for protecting and managing water use in Vanuatu.
7|P ag e
Kawenu Cove Proposed Coastal Reclamation, Port Vila, Vanuatu – A Supplementary EIA Report
Part 3 (sections 11-28) of the Act provides necessary statutory linkages and inter
Government agency co-ordination for implementing EIAs. Subject to a few exceptions
this law states that EIA‟s are mandatory for all development activities, projects and
proposals that cause or are likely to cause significant environmental, social and or
custom impacts, especially those that are likely to:
The Director of the DEPC can approve an EIA report based on the recommendation of
the Review Committee.
The act prohibits excessive noise between 9 pm and 5 am for the urban areas of Port
Vila and it does not include in other areas outside of the municipal boundary.
The use of machineries for the reclamation would have an impact on the people who
live around Fatumaru Bay. And due to the nature of the proposed development, the
operations will be carried out only between 7.30 am and 5.00 pm.
8|P ag e
Kawenu Cove Proposed Coastal Reclamation, Port Vila, Vanuatu – A Supplementary EIA Report
Fisheries Act
The objective of the Act is “To provide for the control, development and matters
incidental thereto” It applies in respect of “Vanuatu waters” is defined to mean
“waters of the exclusive economic zone, territorial sea, archipelagic waters, and internal
waters..”
This Act is administered by the Department of Fisheries and Marine Resources. Based
on the marine survey, it was found that there is little marine life in the proposed area to
be reclaimed. The proposed reclamation would therefore have no significant impact on
the marine resources of the area.
1. Coral and non-coral invertebrates are largely absent. The scope of this survey does
not include a formal investigation into historical uses of the reef that may have
negatively impacted the variety and abundance of invertebrates harvested in the past
(e.g. giant clams).
2. All fish sizes are also largely absent from the reef. The „snapshot‟ nature of the fish
survey does not necessarily encompass enough information to conclusively state that
fishing pressure or loss of habitat has resulted in this situation. However, the ocean is in
a state of collapse in terms of fisheries and habitat loss all over the world. Much of this
can be summarised as management actions to conserve fish stocks and protect
sensitive habitat without absolute proof that they were under threat, were not taken in a
timely fashion. Through that process we are regrettably learning that precaution in the
face of scientific uncertainty is a valid approach.
9|P ag e
Kawenu Cove Proposed Coastal Reclamation, Port Vila, Vanuatu – A Supplementary EIA Report
3. There is between 15% and 20% cyanobacteria, and 5% and 15% funnelweed algae
on the substrate. This is a significant amount. It can quickly deteriorate further if algae-
eaters are not allowed to re-populate the reef.
4. On average over half the bottom is covered in fine silty sediment 1-3mm thick. In
deeper places it is silty mud. The current amount is beyond the ability of most of the
marine life documented on this survey to survive. Recruitment of new coral is
unsuccessful because the substrate that newly spawned coral settles on is not clean.
Fertilised egg packs cannot attach to loose material and subsequently they die.
Based on the limited scope of the marine assessment in this study the author cannot
recommend for or against the proposed reclamation. A broader marine survey is
required beyond the area of reclamation that also includes investigating the seagrass
and mangrove habitats at the head of Fatumaru Bay. And when specific dredging plans
are proposed there needs to be a master plan for the bay that considers the positive
and negative effects of the increase in circulation. However, it is the view of this author
that allowing the status quo of limited circulation and gradual eutrophication of Fatumaru
Bay to continue is irresponsible. The excessive algae in the bay needs to be flushed
out, and point source impacts related to run-off from the old garbage dump and other
sources need to be addressed.
If the proposed reclamation is approved, with or without further study, then this report
makes 8 recommendations to mitigate operations, and 5 recommendations toward
continued conservation practice in the area:
1. The construction of the retaining wall should be complete before reclamation begins.
2. Marine life in the immediate vicinity of the works must be moved to outside the area
of disturbance, beyond the retaining wall on a daily basis. This includes coral colonies
and other marine invertebrates. Much can be moved by hand using labourers. The coral
bommies at site 4 will need the excavator bucket because of their size.
3. Because there is no breakwater along the retaining wall, daily works need to include
placement of large coral boulders for wall construction access. This will also serve to
provide the foundation for additional boulders to be placed along the retaining wall to act
as artificial reef.
4. Only carry out works under reasonably calm conditions where there is no swell and
insignificant wind and waves to mitigate the sediment plume.
10 | P a g e
Kawenu Cove Proposed Coastal Reclamation, Port Vila, Vanuatu – A Supplementary EIA Report
5. Employ a sediment curtain at all times during the works. The curtain should be
floated on top and weighted at the bottom. In shallow water sediment curtains can be
rolled up or shortened.
6. All work must be carried out between 3 hours before and 3 hours after low tide, and
the low tide should ideally be low-low. Ideal is during spring tides when the sun and
moon are in phase, producing often negative tides.
7. Several labourers must be on site to bucket out loose material left behind after the
works before the tide comes in. It will not remove everything, but it is cost effective and
mitigates marine life damage beyond the direct area of disturbance.
8. All materials from the reclamation must be sourced from land in the absence of an
approved dredging plan. If dredging is proposed:
(a). Dredging will aid in flushing of the deeper pools in Fatumaru Bay but may also
cause erosion and possibly unexpected changes in bay morphology over time.
(b). Risk is the cost of an outcome times the probability of that outcome occurring. The
dredging impacts associated with normal conditions and their effects on circulation are
likely to be minimal compared to the risk of damage during cyclones, storm surges, and
tsunamis. Much of that is because excessive water entering through the channel under
such conditions needs a way of exiting the bay instead of piling up at the head and
threatening sensitive environments and other developments.
9. There are seagrass and mangrove communities toward the head of Fatumaru Bay,
and some mangroves within the proposed area to be reclaimed. Every effort should be
made to retain all the mangroves in their current state. To compensate for any
unforeseen loss of mangrove health adjacent to the proposed reclamation, the
Government should strengthen the protection of the seagrass and mangroves at the
head of Fatumaru Bay.
10.Implement a program of marine life monitoring in Fatumaru Bay. This can partially be
integrated into specific remedial or monitoring actions recommended through the EIA
process.
marine life slideshow. The presentation would also be useful for government agencies
and it can support a wider audience as needed.
12, Use the relationships established in local communities and among government
agencies to encourage the custom owner not to allow wild aquarium traders to further
establish themselves in Fatumaru Bay, Port Vila Harbour, and Mele Bay. The return to
historical levels of herbivorous fishes is key to the success or failure of the reef to
mitigate the potential situation of excessive sediment leading to siltation and algal
overgrowth on the reef.
13. Encourage the establishment of a marine interpretive centre around Fatumaru Bay
for residents as well as visitors. Such services can contribute significantly to local
marine conservation efforts, while also adding value to existing tourism and recreation
amenities.
Marine spills Potential for spills of oil and Site specific marine spill
other pollutants from prevention and response
machineries and the
13 | P a g e
restaurant plan.
Other users and uses Use of area by local Marine safety and security
residence within Fatumaru exclusion zone
Bay
15 | P a g e
Kawenu Cove Proposed Coastal Reclamation, Port Vila, Vanuatu – A Supplementary EIA Report
In order to manage and monitor implementation of the EMMP and to ensure compliance
of the project, including contractors, with relevant environmental legislation, including
permit and approval conditions, a Supervisor who has environmental expertise or an
Environmental Consultant should be appointed by THL to oversee the construction work
The Supervisor‟s duties should include providing overall supervision to all contractors
and workers involved in the construction phase, to ensure that they are fully aware of
their obligations under the EMMP and relevant legislation.
Once the construction is complete, the THL should designate an appropriately qualified
person or hire a consultant, tasked with monitoring and reporting to management on
implementation of the EMMP and on compliance of the ongoing operation of proposed
development terminal with relevant environmental legislation, including permit and
approval conditions.
The EMMP Officer’s duties should include providing advise on the provisions of the
relevant laws to workers and contractors involved in the operation of the construction, to
ensure that they are in compliance with the provisions of the laws.
16 | P a g e
Kawenu Cove Proposed Coastal Reclamation, Port Vila, Vanuatu – A Supplementary EIA Report
17 | P a g e
• Oversize Traffic: “
Contractor to liaise with the
Vanuatu Police Traffic
Section and the Port Vila
Municipal Council prior to
transportation of any
particularly large or unusual
items by road.
Impacts on soil quality • Vehicle oiling and fueling: Contractor
Develop and implement a Owner/Operator
proper arrangements for
the servicing, oiling and
refueling of vehicles and
machinery used during the
construction phase
• Oil handling: Develop and
implement proper “
arrangements for safe
storage, handling and
containment of oils and fuel
used during the
construction phase
18 | P a g e
phase, including gross-
pollutant, sediment and oil
traps
• Environmental Offset: “
Possible declaration of tabu
over Fatumaru Bay to
compensate from
destruction of corals
20 | P a g e
Kawenu Cove Proposed Coastal Reclamation, Port Vila, Vanuatu – A Supplementary EIA Report
22 | P a g e
Kawenu Cove Proposed Coastal Reclamation, Port Vila, Vanuatu – A Supplementary EIA Report
4. SUMMARY CONCLUSION
The Supplementary EIA was undertaken from 9 to 14 November 2011, including the
marine survey following international the recommendations of the review committee.
The Supplementary EIA finds that the environment at and around Kawenu Cove and
Fatumaru Bay generally is important and valuable, including special cultural significance
for the Ifira people,significant coral communities immediately adjacent to the site on
Malapoa Reef, and important socio-economic values such as subsistence fishing by
local communities and marine-based tourism.
The Supplementary EIA finds that the proposed project has the potential to impact on
these resources and values, and that care needs to be taken in the design,
construction and operation of the proposed reclamation, so as to avoid/minimize such
impacts.
In accordance with EIA standards, the Supplementary EIA assesses the likely
impacts of the proposed development according to the following categories:
The table above summarizes the main findings of the Supplementary EIA in relation to
each of these impact categories. Some of the main impacts include, but are not limited
to:
To address the potential for such impacts, the Supplementary EIA includes a proposed
Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan (EMMP) for both the construction and
operational phases.
The Supplementary EIA also finds that the proposed development will improve
environmental protection compared to the existing facility in a number of important
ways,including but are not limited to:
23 | P a g e
Kawenu Cove Proposed Coastal Reclamation, Port Vila, Vanuatu – A Supplementary EIA Report
Overall the Supplementary EIA concludes that so long as the recommended EMMP is
properly implemented, the proposed development should not pose an
unacceptable risk of causing adverse impacts on the physical, biological, socio-
economic and cultural environment, natural resources and values of Fatumaru Bay.
The Supplementary EIA concludes there is no environmental reason that the project
should not be approved for construction, on the condition that the recommended EMMP
is fully and properly implemented.
Should the proposed works change in terms of location, layout, scope and/or scale from
what has been assessed in this Supplementary EIA, including any changes to the
proposed reclamation activities as outlined in this report, then such changes should be
subject to additional EIA prior to approval.
24 | P a g e
Kawenu Cove Proposed Coastal Reclamation, Port Vila, Vanuatu – A Supplementary EIA Report
5. REFERENCES
Anon., 2007. Pacific Country Report, Sea Level & Climate: Their Present State, Vanuatu,
December 2007. Report to Australian Agency for International Development.
Ash,R.P et al.1978. Geology of Efate and Offshore Islands, New Hebrides Geological Survey
Regional Report
Carter, R., 1983. Baseline Studies of Port Vila and Erakor Lagoons, Vanuatu. Cruise Report
No. 82 of PE/VA.6/T-1 to 4. Prepared for Committee for Co-ordination of Joint Prospecting
for Mineral Resources in South Pacific Offshore Areas (CCOP/SOPAC) Work Programme
CCSP-1/VA.6. Joint contribution by 1) South Pacific Regional Environment Programme
(SPREP), South Pacific Commission; 2) UNDP project RAS/81/102 Investigation of Mineral
Potential of the South Pacific.
GoV. 1986. Physical Planning Act No.12 of 1986, Port Vila, Vanuatu
GoV. 2002. Environmental Management and Conservation Act No.12 of 2002, Port Vila,
Vanuatu
Hay, J.E., 2008. Climate Risk Profile for Vanuatu. John E. Hay & Associates Ltd, New
Zealand.
SOPAC (South Pacific Applied Geosciences Commission), 2003. Catastrophe Insurance Pilot
Project, Port Vila, Vanuatu : Developing Risk-management Options for Disasters in the
Pacific Region : Project Summary. SOPAC, Suva.
Vanuatu (Government of). Disaster Risk Reduction and Disaster Management National Action
Plan (2006-2016).
25 | P a g e
Kawenu Cove Proposed Coastal Reclamation, Port Vila, Vanuatu – A Supplementary EIA Report
6. ANNEXES
Annex 1
26 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e
30 | P a g e
Annex 2
31 | P a g e
Annex 3
ANNEX 3
32 | P a g e
33 | P a g e
34 | P a g e
35 | P a g e