REVIEWER IN SOCSS1a
REVIEWER IN SOCSS1a
REVIEWER IN SOCSS1a
HISTORY – derived from the Greek word HISTORIA which means “knowledge acquired through inquiry or
investigation.”
LOUIS GOTTSCHALK – born on Feb. 21, 1899, the sixth of eight children of Morris and Anna Gottschalk,
Jewish immigrants to Brooklyn from Poland.
SECONDARY SOURCE – is the testimony of anyone who is not an eyewitness – that is, of one who was not
present of the events of which he tells.
ORIGINAL SOURCES – to describe a source, unpolished, untranslated, as it issued from the hands of the
authors.
PRIMARY SOURCES – needs to be original in either of these two ways. They need to be original only in the
sense of underived or first – hand as to their testimony.
THE DOCUMENT – document becomes synonymous with source, whether written or not, official or not,
primary or not.
HUMAN DOCUMENT – has been derived as “an account of individual experience which reveals the
individual’s actions as a human agent and as participant in social life.”
PERSONAL DOCUMENT – has been defined as “any self-revealing record that intentionally or unintentionally
yields information regarding the structure, dynamics and functioning if the authors mental life.”
HISTORICAL FACT – in the process of analysis, the historian should constantly keep in mind the relevant
particulars within the document rather than the document as a whole.
- A historical “fact” thus may be defined as a particular derived directly or indirectly from historical
documents and regarded as credible after careful testing in accordance with the historical method.
Every historical subject has four aspects:
1. The Biographical
2. Geographical
3. Chronological
4. The Occupational or Functional
THE PERSONAL EQUATION – the ability and the willingness of a witness to give dependable testimony are
determined by a number of factors in his personally and social situation that together are sometimes called his
“personal equation.”
EGOCENTRISM – it is to be expected that even the modest observer will tell what the himself heard and what
he himself did as if those details were the most important things that were sold and done.
(WITNESS’S) NEARNESS TO THE EVENT – nearness is here used in both a geographical and chronological
sense.
COMPETENCE – depends upon the degree of expertise, state of mental and physical health, age education,
memory, narrative skills, etc.
DEGREE OF ATTENTION – is also important factor in the ability to tell the truth. The common human inability
to see things clearly and whole makes even the best of witnesses suspect.
LEADING QUESTIONS – such questions, by implying the expected answer, make it difficult to tell the whole
truth. Such questions are especially liable to be misleading if they have to be answered by “Yes” or “No.”
INTEREST(ED WITNESS) – certain kinds of propaganda are perhaps the worst examples of deliberate
perversion of truth out of a desire to benefit a course.
BIAS – often the benefit to be derived from a perversion of truth is subtle and may not be realized by the
witness himself. STUDIUM (bias for) – if the witness’s bias is favorable to the subject of his testimony. ODIUM
OR INA (bias against) – if it is unfavorable.
DESIRE TO PLEASE OR TO DISPLEASE – may lead to the coloring or the avoidance of the truth.
LITERARY STYLE – sometimes dictates the sacrifice of the truth. The anecdote is especially suspect.
LAWS AND CONVENTIONS – sometimes oblige witnesses to deport from strict veracity.
INEXACT DATING – of historical documents because of the conventions and formalities involved.
EXPECTATION OR ANTICIPATION – frequently leads a witness astray. A certain lack of precision is found in
such witness because their eyes and ears are closed to fair observation…