Nurroaini Nim 200400758

BAHASA INGGRIS II
DOSEN
CHAHYA KUSUMA, S.Pd.,M.A
DISUSUN OLEH:
NURROAINI (200500758)
PROGRAM STUDI S1 ILMU GIZI

UNIVERSITAS ALMA ATA
YOGYAKARTA
2021
Overal
1. What was the article type?

The article type is original article.
2. What was the title?
Fast food for family meals: relationships with parent and adolescent food intake,
home food availability and weight status
3. Who were the authors?
Kerri N Boutelle, Jayne A Fulkerson, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer, Mary Storyand
Simone A French
Introduction
4. What was the research problem?

examine the prevalence of fastfood purchases for family meals and the associations
with sociodemographic variables, dietary intake, home food environment, and weight
status in adolescents and their parents.
5. Was there any mention of previous studies on this topic?
Yes, Empirical evidence suggests that the eating behaviours of children and
adolescents are shaped by parenting feeding Fast-food family meals behaviours.
Dietary intake aggregates within families and individual behaviours are greatly
influenced by characteristics within the family, such as the number of meals eaten
together. In addition, parents purchase the foods within the home and one of the
strongest correlates of food intake is home availability of foods.
6. Why was this study performed (the rationale)?
relationships with parent and adolescent food intake, home food availability and
weight status.
7. What were the aims and objectives of the study?
Answer: The purpose of the present study was to examine the prevalence of fastfood
purchases for family meals and the associations with sociodemographic variables,
dietary intake, home food environment, and weight status in adolescents and their
parents.
8. What was the study (research) hypothesis?
One hypothesis is that fast food for family meals may be displacing other healthier
foods in the diet. Another hypothesis is that both fast food and unhealthy dietary
practices could be associated with an overall less healthy eating pattern in the home.
Material and Methods
9. How did the researcher attempt to answer the research question?

This study is a cross-sectional evaluation of parent interviews and adolescent surveys
from Project EAT (Eating Among Teens).
10. How was the sampling done?
using a a random sample of 943 adolescents was selected to have a parent interviewed
with a total of 902 parent interviews completed (87% participation rate)
11. How were they grouped (categorized)?
The 902 adolescents in the study were split evenly by gender (47% male, 53%
female) and 60% were in high school. The percentage of adolescents reporting in each
of the racial/ethnic groups was as follows: 29% white, 24% black, 21% Asian
American, 14% Hispanic and 12% other. Of the 902 parents/guardians, 89% were
female, 63% were married, 43% were white, and socio-economic status (SES) was
equally represented in low, medium and high groups (based on highest level of
education by either parent). The percentage of parents reporting in each of the
racial/ethnic groups was as follows: 43% white, 22% black, 18% Asian American,
10% Hispanic and 7% other.
12. What were the inclusion criteria?
Parents’ demographics and weight status. Parents reported their marital status,
race/ethnicity, SES, and current height and weight
13. What were the exclusion criteria?
There is no
14. What procedures were followed?
Analyses revealed five approximately equally distributed categories (low,
low/medium, medium, medium/high and high) and were primarily reflective of the
education level of the highest educated parent in a household. Parents’ BMI was
calculated from their selfreported height and weight.
15. Which variabels were measured?
food intake, home food availability and weight status
16. What equipment/instruments were used for data collection? Were they appropriate?
Measurement tools for height, weight adn qoestionnaires
17. What statistical methods/test were employed? Were they apt for evaluation?
Using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS Version 8.2; SAS Institute). Chi-square
analyses were conducted to examine the relationships between purchases of fast food
for family meals and parent- and adolescent-reported demographics.
Results
18. What were the key findings?
Results showed that parents who reported purchasing fast food for family meals at
least 3 times per week were significantly more likely than parents who reported
purchasing fewer fast-food family meals to report the availability of soda pop and
chips in the home. Adolescents in homes with fewer than 3 fast-food family meals per
week were significantly more likely than adolescents in homes with more fast-food
family meals to report having vegetables and milk served with meals at home.
19. Were all the subjects present in the beginning of the sytudy accounted for at the end
of the study?
Yes, alright
20. Were the results reliable?
yes, the results reliable
21. Were the results valid?
Yes, the results valid
22. Which results were statistically significant?
Home adolescents with fewer than 3 fast food families per week were significantly
more likely than home adolescents with more fast-food family meals who reported
having vegetables and milk served with meals at home.
23. Which results were statistically non-significant?
There were no significant differences found in fast-food frequency by marital status of
the parent (% married: 0 meals, 42.0; 1–2 meals, 49.8; 3þ meals, 8.2) or by cohort of
the child (% grades 7–9: 0 meals, 39.5; 1–2 meals, 50.6; 3þ meals, 9.9).
24. Were the tables/graphs easy to comprehend?
Yes, the tables/graphs easy to comprehend
Discussion
25. Did the results answer the research question?
Yes, the results answer the research question
26. What were the author’s interpretations of the data?
Home adolescents with fewer than 3 fast food families per week were significantly
dan
There were no significant differences found in fast-food frequency by marital status of
the parent
27. Was the analysis of the data relevant to the research question?
Yes, the analysis of the data relevant to the research question
28. How were these results different/similar when comared to others studies?
The study findings showed that more frequent fast-food purchases for family meals
was associated with overweight among female parents, the availability of less
nutritious foods in the home, fewer vegetables and higher salty snack intake among
parents, and trends for higher fat, higher saturated fat and less frequent breakfast
consumption in adolescents. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to
extend beyond mere fast-food consumption by individuals to examine factors
associated with purchases of fast food for family meals
29. What were the strenghts of the study?
Strengths of this study that enhance our ability to draw conclusions from the findings
include the large and diverse sample in terms of race/ethnicity and SES, the collection
of data from both adolescents and their parents, and the assessment of a broad array of
dietary data.
30. What were the limitation of the study?
the limitations of this study such as the self-reported data and the cross-sectional
design should also be considered when interpreting these results.
31. Were there any extralopation of the finings beyond the range of data?
No
Conclusions
32. What were the conclusions?
Fast-food purchases may be helpful for busy families, but families need to be
educated on the effects of fast food for family meals and how to choose healthier,
convenient family meals.
33. Were the author’s conclusions based upon reported data and analysis?
Yes, the author’s conclusions based upon reported data and analysis
34. Were the conclusions reasonable and logical?
Yes, the conclusions reasonable and logical
35. Will the results be useful in clinical practice or for further research?
Yes, the results be useful in clinical practice or for further research
36. Was the study worth doing?
Yes, the study worth doing
37. Does the reader have any questions unanswered by the article?
No, i don’t have a questions
References
38. Were the references cited according to journal’s requirement?
Yes, the references cited according to journal’s requirement
39. Were all the citations correct?
Yes, all the citations correct
40. Were all the references cited in the text?
Yes, all the references cited in the text

Nurroaini Nim 200400758

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nurroaini Nim 200400758

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nurroaini Nim 200400758

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

BAHASA INGGRIS II

PROGRAM STUDI S1 ILMU GIZI

1. What was the article type?

4. What was the research problem?

9. How did the researcher attempt to answer the research question?

You might also like