Revised QAME Analysis Form 1: ANALYSIS OF THE MONITORING/EVALUATION RESULTS

(to be accomplished by Individual Monitors)

Title of the Training Program: STRENGTHENING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING AND LISTENING SKILLS THROUGH EFFECTIVE TEACHING STRATEGIES IN THE NEW
NORMAL
Inclusive Dates: August 05-07, 2021
Learning Service Provider (Division/HEI): Tumauini National High School Class Section: _1_____ Venue: __Google Meet/Classroom____________________
Proponent: _______CORAZON T. CUSTODIO________ Name of Monitor: ____FABIO M. MACALLING JR., PhD__ Date Monitored: August 05-07, 2021

PART I: Analysis of the Session and Facilitation Evaluation

Based on the results of the evaluation of the session and facilitation done by the participants, as well as the validated observations of the On-Site monitors,
answer the following questions:

1. What are the strong points of the session? Of the facilitator? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible.
SESSION TITLE Strong Points Factors that helped Areas for Factors that may have Recommended Steps
(This may be done through a Improvement contributed to the to Address the
Focus-Group Discussion)
areas for Issue/s. (Indicate
improvement whether action can be
(This may be done through a immediate or long-term)
Focus-Group Discussion)
Session 1: Teaching Speaking Skills The participants were The teachers shared More samples of Lack of face-to-face Use of Locally-
to 21st Century learners and How able to understand the their experiences in speaking drills and interaction limits the developed Speaking
to Practice Speaking Skills in concepts of teaching teaching speech sounds practices. mobility of teachers Strategies quality
Distance Learning and speaking skills to and speaking. for demonstration. assured by the
Introduction to Practical English students. Division Quality
Spoken English Assurance Team

Average Rating: 3.81

Session 2: Preparation, The participants were so The facilitator presented Teachers’ involvement No face-to-face Show more samples of
Development and Evaluation of engaged in this topic ways and strategies on in developing interaction developed and
Instructional Materials in Speaking particularly on how to develop and Instructional evaluated
developing and evaluate Instructional Materials. Instructional
evaluating Instructional Materials in Speaking. Materials.
Materials in Speaking.

Average Rating: 3.85

Session 3: Teaching Listening Skills The participants were The teachers shared More theories in Lack of theories that Search for more
to 21st Century learners able to understand the their experiences in teaching listening would support the listening theories
concepts of teaching teaching listening. skills teaching of listening online to support the
listening skills to said topic.
students.

Average Rating: 3.88

Session 4: How to Practice The facilitator presented The facilitator Encourage teachers to Need more resources. Provide more samples
Listening Skills in Distance innovative teaching enumerated samples of innovate teaching of innovating teaching
Learning strategies which can be practices in teaching listening strategies. strategies in listening.
implemented to aid listening.
Average Rating: 3.81 learning in the new-
normal.

Session 5: Preparation, The participants were so The facilitator Teachers’ involvement No face-to-face Show more samples of
Development and Evaluation of engaged in this topic highlighted ways and in developing interaction developed and
Instructional Materials in Listening particularly on strategies on how to Instructional evaluated
developing and develop and evaluate Materials. Instructional
evaluating Instructional Instructional Materials Materials.
Average Rating: 3.85 Materials in Listening. in Listening.

2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these incidents in the table below:
Critical Incident (Refer to the STAR form) Identify deviation from Standard/s Proposed Course/s of Action to Address the Deviation
NONE

PART II: Analysis of the Daily Operations of the Program / Training Management

Based on the results of the evaluation of the daily operations, answer the following questions:
1. What are the strong points of the daily operations of the training program? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible.
DAY Overall Rating Strong Points Areas for Improvement and Suggestions
1 The mastery of the resource speaker is very evident. The moderator shall start the program on time.
(AM) 3.81

1 The program started early and mastery of the resource Participants must be reminded to mute their
(PM) 3.85 speaker is very evident. microphone when the speaker is having her lecture.

2 The participants are so engaged and resource speaker The participants must be reminded of the house rules
(AM) 3.86 explains well the topic. on the second day to avoid disruptions.

2 The mastery of the resource speaker is very evident. The moderator should remind participants to submit
(PM) 3.88 their activities.
3 The speaker provided samples of listening and speaking The moderator should remind participants to submit
(AM & 3.81 activities that are current. their activities.
PM)
AVERAGE
RATING FOR 3.84
OPERATIONS

2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these incidents in the table below:
Critical Incident (Refer to the STAR form) Identify deviation from Standard/s Proposed Course/s of Action to Address the Deviation
 None

IMPORTANT: Parts I and II should be used for Debriefing as Feedback to the Program Management Team for information and immediate action

PART III: ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAM EVALUATION (to be accomplished at the end of the training program)
Identify Class Section/s and Program Attainment of Delivery of Provision of Program Training Meals
batches Management Objectives Content Support Management Venue/Goog Average
Materials Team le Meet
Day 1 3.89 3.79 3.82 3.78 3.88 3.82 3.83
Day 2 3.91 3.85 3.82 3.86 3.88 3.89 3.87
Day 3 3.83 3.78 3.85 3.89 3.83 3.78 3.81
3.84
Top three (3) responses based on participant feedback:
SIGNIFICANT LEARNING

The participants praised the lecturers for their sound explanation of the important topics.

They were very grateful to be equipped with the teaching listening and speaking strategies in the new-normal.

All of the facilitators were very patient when it comes to queries and clarifications.
FURTHER LEARNING

The pandemic might have changed the way we deliver learning but innovative strategies are always available to improve teaching and
learning.
COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT

N/A
Submitted by: Submitted to / Received by:

FABIO M. MACALLING JR.,PhD

Secondary School Principal IV PMT Secretariat:______________________
 Revised QAME Analysis Form 2: SUMMARY OF DAILY MONITORING AND EVALUATION
(to be accomplished by QATAME Team Leader)

Title of the Training Program: STRENGTHENING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING AND LISTENING SKILLS THROUGH EFFECTIVE TEACHING STRATEGIES IN THE NEW
NORMAL
Inclusive Dates: August 05-07, 2021
Learning Service Provider (Division/HEI):Tumauini South District Learning Area/s: English/Filipino Venue: Google Meet
Proponent: CORAZON T. CUSTODIO No. of Participants: 14 Name of On-Site Team Leader: FATIMA A. LUGA

1. What is the daily overall rating of the sessions and facilitators?

Overall Session-Facilitator Rating General General
Day (Average of General Rating for Rating for Rating for Summary of Comments and Suggestions
Sessions and Facilitators) Sessions Facilitators
1 3.83 3.90 3.87 The topics were engaging and relevant.
2 3.87 3.78 3.78 The flow is sometimes disrupted due to poor connection. But we can follow
through the recap done by the facilitators at the end.
3 3.81 3.91 3.66 Job well done!

SITE AVERAGE FOR SESSIONS AND 3.84

FACILITATORS: 3.85
Major Observations/ Findings:
The objectives were achieved and activities were challenging. The facilitators are competent and show mastery of their topics.

2. What is the overall rating of the daily operations of the training program?
Day Overall Rating Summary of Significant Comments and Suggestions
1 3.83 The program taught them to level-up in terms teaching listening and speaking through different modalities

2 3.87
The activities were systematic except for minor internet connectivity disruptions
3 3.81 The moderator is alert and effective in guiding the participants

AVERAGE FOR 3.84

OPERATIONS
Major Observations/ Findings:
The overall flow of the program is systematic. Although there are some delays due to poor connectivity, the program beat the time.

3. Are there critical incidents that should be addressed by the Training Program Provider/Management?
CRITICAL INCIDENT/S BASED ON STAR Action Taken by the Program Management Status

Poor Internet Connectivity that disrupted Sent recorded Sessions and Recap done by the Teachers/participants were satisfied and their queries
the discussion facilitators on their missed discussion were answered.

Major Observations/Findings:
The seminar was relevant and timely on the part of the teachers so that they can prepare themselves in teaching in the new normal.
ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAM EVALUATION (to be accomplished at the end of the training program)
DAY Program Attainment of Delivery of Provision of Program Training Venue
Management Objectives Content Support Management (Google Meet) Average
Materials Team
1 3.89 3.79 3.82 3.78 3.88 3.82 3.83
2 3.91 3.85 3.82 3.86 3.88 3.89 3.87
3 3.83 3.78 3.85 3.89 3.83 3.78 3.81
General 3.84
Average

Top three (3) responses based on participant feedback:

SIGNIFICANT LEARNING
Activities were effective and challenging
The participants were able to realize the need for different strategies in relation to the different platforms/modality
Teaching listening and speaking must be fun

FURTHER LEARNING
More strategies were needed
More activities were encouraged
More time for mastery on the part of the participants
COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT
More varied strategies be given to have choices on the appropriate strategies to be used on different learners and learning platforms

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE TRAINING PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS:

The participants will be given chance to apply and present the strategies to test effectivity and appropriateness
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY ACTION:

Different activities in the different modalities be provided especially on the materials needed in the innovative teaching strategies.

Prepared / Submitted by: Recommending Approval: APPROVED:

FATIMA A. LUGA EVA L. CARONAN FABIO M. MACALLING JR.,PhD

QATAME Team Leader Head Teacher I Principal IV

Copy Given to / Received by: Program Management Team Secretariat _____________________