Drug and Alcohol Review (November 2006), 25, 489 – 502

Global use of alcohol, drugs and tobacco

PETER ANDERSON

Consultant in Public Health, Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract
Humans have always used drugs, probably as part of their evolutionary and nutritional heritage. However, this previous
biological adaptation is unlikely to be so in the modern world, in which 2 billion adults (48% of the adult population) are
current users of alcohol, 1.1 billion adults (29% of the adult population) are current smokers of cigarettes and 185 million adults
(4.5% of the adult population) are current users of illicit drugs. The use of drugs is determined largely by market forces, with
increases in affordability and availability increasing use. People with socio-economic deprivation, however measured, are at
increased risk of harmful drug use, as are those with a disadvantaged family environment, and those who live in a community
with higher levels of substance use. Substance use is on the increase in low-income countries which, in the coming decades, will
bear a disproportionate burden of substance-related disability and premature death. [Anderson P. Global use of alcohol,
drugs and tobacco. Drug Alcohol Rev 2006;25:489 – 502]

Key words: alcohol, drug, substance use, tobacco.

was actively cultivated [16]. Already by the beginning of

Introduction
the second century BC, wine played an important
Drug use as part of the human diet has a long economic role in the Italian home market and it
history, following biological exposure to low level of became a valuable trade commodity and a major source
alcohol through eating fruit [1] and as a potential of wealth [17], spreading throughout Europe following
source of micronutrients and neurotransmitter-related the Roman conquests. Wine was brought to England
chemicals [2]. by the Romans, but when they left subsequent invaders,
Betel nut, the fourth most used drug in the world the Angles, Saxons, Jutes and Vikings, favoured ale and
after nicotine, ethanol and caffeine [3], was being cider and the wine trade diminished. In countries such
chewed approximately 13 000 years ago in Timor as England and Germany, wine remained the drink of
[4,5] and 10 700 years ago in Thailand [6,7]. At the the aristocracy and the wealthy classes while most
time of European contact, indigenous people were people drank ale, mead or whatever was cheapest and
exploiting the native plant pituri for its nicotine most easily produced [18]. Economic factors under-
content in western Queensland, and nicotiana in pinned the ‘gin epidemic’ in 18th-century England,
central Australia [8,9]. Tobacco species were spread when consumption rose from 2.5 million litres in 1700
throughout most of the Americas by the time of to over 25 million in 1735 [19]. The rise followed
conquest, being one of the oldest of the ‘New World’ government action to help farmers find a market for
cultivated substances [10]. Similarly, the use of khat excess grain and to destroy the trade in smuggled
in Ethiopia and north-east Africa was already an old French brandy.
practice before the arrival of colonists [11]. Coca was This paper, largely using data derived from the
being domesticated in the western Andes by 7000 World Health Organisation’s Global Burden of Disease
years ago [12], and archaeological artefacts date the study, describes the current use of alcohol, illicit drugs
use of coca in Ecuador to at least 5000 years and tobacco throughout the world, considers the
ago [13]. impact of poverty and market forces on the harmful
Early societies produced alcohol from a variety of use of substances, describes some of the risk and
different substances that were locally available [14], protective factors and discusses some of the likely
including grain, honey [15] and the grapevine, which future trends in substance use.

Peter Anderson MD, PhD, Consultant in Public Health, Strandvejen 97 1tv, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark. Correspondence to Peter Anderson.
E-mail: pdanderson@compuserve.com
Received 30 June 2006; accepted for publication 31 August 2006.

ISSN 0959-5236 print/ISSN 1465-3362 online/06/060489–14 ª Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and Other Drugs
DOI: 10.1080/09595230600944446
490 Peter Anderson

The use of alcohol, drugs and tobacco

Alcohol
World-wide, one half of the total adult population
(2billion people) uses alcohol [20]. The proportion of
users varies across countries from 18% to 90% of adult
males, and from 1% to 81% of adult females. Per capita
consumption varies widely across the world (Fig. 1).
The epidemiological sub-regions used in the global
burden of disease studies referred to in this paper are
summarised in Appendix 1.
The use of alcohol is distributed unevenly throughout
the population [21]; most of the alcohol in a society is
drunk by a relatively small minority of drinkers. In the
Netherlands in the mid-1980s, the top one-tenth of
drinkers consumed more than one-third of the total
alcohol, and the top 30% of the drinkers accounted
for up to three-quarters of all consumption [22]. In
China, it has been estimated that the top 12.5% of
the drinkers consume 60% of the total amount of
alcohol [23].
World-wide, it is estimated that there are 76.4 million
people with alcohol use disorders, 63.7 million men
and 12.7 million women [20]. Table 1 shows the dis-
tribution of ‘high-risk drinking’ (defined as more than
40 g alcohol per day for men and more than 20 g a day
for women) by age and by World Bank region. The table
excludes the Middle East and North Africa because
prevalence rates of high-risk drinking are con-
siderably lower than 1%. ‘High-risk drinking’ is, in
general, more prevalent among men than among
women [24].

Illicit drugs
World-wide, 185 million adults are estimated to have
used illicit drugs in 2002 [25,26]; 146.2 million
adults (3.7% of the population) used cannabis in
2002, 29.6 million used amphetamines, 13.3 million
used cocaine and 8.3 million used ecstasy. An
estimated 15.3 million, or 0.4% of the world
population aged 15 – 64 years, used illicit opioids;
more than half used heroin and the remainder used
opium or diverted pharmaceutical opioids. Cannabis
is used across all countries of the world. Opiate use is Figure 1. Population weighted means of the recorded adult per
concentrated in Asia and Europe and cocaine use is capita consumption in the WHO Regions 1961 – 99. SEARO
(South-East Asia); WPRO (Western Pacific); EURO (European);
concentrated in the Americas and to a lesser extent
AMRO (Eastern Mediterranean); AMRO (Americas) AFRO
Europe. (Africa). Source: Rehm et al., 2004 [24].
Illicit opioids continue to be the major illicit drug
problem in most regions of the world in terms of impact
Tobacco
on public health and public order [25]. It is estimated
that there are 15.2 million injecting drug users globally, It is estimated that 1.1 billion adults (29% of the
10.3 million in low-income countries [27]. It is population aged 15 years and over) smoke cigarettes or
estimated that there are 15.3 million people world- bidis (a hand-rolled cigarette common to South East
wide with drug use disorders, 11.7 million men and 3.6 Asia and India) daily [29,30] (Table 2). Smoking
million women [28]. prevalence is highest in Europe and Central Asia, where
 Global use of alcohol, drugs and tobacco 491

Table 1. Distribution of high risk drinking (more than 40 g alcohol per day for men and more than 20 g a day for women) by World Bank
region, year 2000 (% of the population)

Age group (years)

World Bank Region Gender 15 – 29 30 – 44 45 – 59 60 – 69 70 –

Europe and Central Asia Male 20.8 18.7 21.4 15.2 8.1
Female 11.2 10.4 11.5 7.9 5.7
Latin America and the Caribbean Male 9.7 11.1 10.6 7.9 3.4
Female 6.8 7.5 6.5 5.8 3.1
Sub-Saharan Africa Male 10.4 14.3 12.9 11.3 8.4
Female 3.1 4.7 5.1 3.2 2.2
East Asia and the Pacific Male 6.2 7.5 7.1 6.5 5.0
Female 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0
South Asia Male 0.8 2.5 0.3 0.1 0.0
Female 1.2 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0
High-income countries Male 18.0 17.9 16.2 10.9 7.6
Female 10.9 8.7 9.8 6.8 5.4

Source: Rehm et al. [133].

Table 2. Estimated smoking prevalence (by gender) and number of smokers, 15 years of age and older, 2000

Smoking prevalence (%) Total smokers

World Bank region Males Females Overall Millions Percentage of all smokers

East Asia and the Pacific 63 5 34 429 38

Europe and Central Asia 56 17 35 122 11
Latin America and the Caribbean 40 24 32 98 9
Middle East and North Africa 36 5 21 37 3
South Asia 32 6 20 178 15
Sub-Saharan Africa 29 8 18 56 6
Low- and middle-income economies 49 8 29 920 82
High-income economies 37 21 29 202 18

Source: Jha et al. [134].

35% of all adults are smokers. Low-income and While overall smoking prevalence continues to
middle-income countries, whose populations account increase in many low- and middle-income countries,
for four-fifths of the global adult population, account many high-income countries have witnessed
for 82% of the world’s smokers [31]. On average, the decreases, most clearly in men. A study in 36 mostly
world’s smokers consume 14 cigarettes (or bidis) each high-income countries, from early 1980 to the mid-
per day. Daily consumption per smoker is highest in 1990s, suggested that the decrease in smoking
high-income countries, where both males and females prevalence observed among men was caused by the
smoke on average 20 cigarettes a day and lowest in higher prevalence in younger age groups of those
Latin America [30]. who have never smoked. Among women, there was
Globally, the prevalence of daily smoking is higher little overall change in smoking prevalence because
for men (47%) than for women (11%) and highest for the increasing prevalence of smokers in younger
people aged 30 – 49 years (36 – 37%) [30]. Males in cohorts counterbalanced increasing cessation in
low-income countries have a higher prevalence of daily older age groups [32].
smoking (49%) than do males in high-income countries
(38%), while the reverse is true for females (9% in low-
Market forces and substance use
income countries and 21% in high income countries).
Most smokers start smoking before the age of 25 years, Two of the main determinants of substance use are
often in childhood or adolescence. affordability and availability.
492 Peter Anderson

result of reduced initiation of tobacco use, increased

Affordability
cessation and reductions in the consumption of tobacco
Affordability relates to both income and price. Table 3 products by continuing users. Price is particularly
summarises the prevalence of alcohol and tobacco use effective in reducing tobacco use among youth and
by poverty for selected regions of the world, by three young adults, for whom demand is estimated to be up
daily income categories (5US$1/day, US$1 – 2/day and to three times more sensitive to price [34].
4US$2/day). People with higher incomes are more Increases in the price of alcohol reduce both the use
likely to use alcohol than people with low incomes, and consumption of alcohol products. A 10% increase
whereas income level has little relation to tobacco use. in price can reduce the long-term consumption of
In two sub-regions—AFR-E (South Africa data only) alcohol by about 7% in high income countries and,
and AMR-B (Panama only)—poor people had appro- although there are very limited data, by about 10%
ximately half the prevalence of alcohol use of non- in low income countries [35]. Young drinkers and
poor people. In AFR-E (South Africa data only) and frequent and heavy drinkers are more sensitive to price
AMR-D (Ecuador data only) there was a suggestion of than older drinkers or infrequent or light drinkers (see
lower prevalence of tobacco use among the poorest, Chaloupka, this issue).
and in EMR-B (Pakistan only) the converse. Economic modelling from black markets in other
The price of tobacco affects the prevalence and con- commodities (tea, coffee and tobacco) suggests that
sumption of tobacco products [33]. A price rise of 10% rendering a substance illegal results in substantial
will reduce cigarette smoking in high-income countries increases in its price [36]. Silverman & Spruill [37]
by up to 5% and in low-income and middle-income obtained indirect evidence that demand for heroin
countries by up to 8% [33]. The reductions are the shows little elasticity (a term to measure how much use
changes when price changes) in the long term, but
significant elasticity in the short term. On the other
Table 3. The prevalence of alcohol and tobacco use by poverty for hand, Van Ours [38] estimated for pre-World War II
selected WHO regions opium production that a 10% increase in price would
result in a 7% decrease in consumption in the short
Prevalence Prevalence term and a 10% decrease in the long term. Grapendall
(%) of (%) of
Sub-region Income level alcohol use tobacco use [39] concluded on the basis of interview data that
demand for heroin is price-elastic because heroin users
AFR-D 5US$ 1/day 35.5 16.5 report adjusting their consumption levels to their daily
US$ 1 – 2/day 38.3 13.7 income rather than vice versa. Saffer & Chaloupka [40]
4US$ 2/day 45.5 14.7 and Caulkins [41] both estimate relatively high
AFR-E 5US$ 1/day 28.9 19.2 elasticities for both cocaine and heroin in the United
US$ 1 – 2/day 38.7 22.4 States. More recently Grossman, Chaloupka & Brown
4US$ 2/day 60.6 26.5 [42] have obtained similar results for cocaine. A
AMR-B 5US$ 1/day 35.7 31.2 reduction in supply of heroin in Australia during
US$ 1 – 2/day 51.6 34.8 December 2000 increased the price of heroin by
4US$ 2/day 75.0 29.5
112%, which led to a reduction in heroin overdoses
AMR-D 5US$ 1/day 54.8 19.2
of 53%. There was some evidence of substitution with
US$ 1 – 2/day 60.2 23.6
4US$ 2/day 65.9 31.9 an increase in cocaine use [43].
EMR-D 5US$ 1/day – 29.2
US$ 1 – 2/day – 24.8 Availability
4US$ 2/day 17.6
EUR-B 5US$ 1/day 51.3 31.1 A natural experiment that occurred nearly 100 years
US$ 1 – 2/day 47.6 28.6 ago illustrates the relationship between the availability
4US$ 2/day 64.9 36.7 of alcohol and alcohol consumption and the harm
EUR-C 5US$ 1/day 67.9 37.1 caused by alcohol. Prompted by the shortage of food
US$ 1 – 2/day 73.2 35.4 supply during the First World War (but also motivated
4US$ 2/day 89.1 34.4
by state revenues and temperance concerns [44]), the
WPR-B 5US$ 1/day 51.4 36.0
Danish government imposed a number of alcohol
US$ 1 – 2/day 54.5 34.3
4US$ 2/day 62.0 34.6 restrictions and tax increases in 1917 and 1918. The
Total (of the 5US$ 1/day 44.2 28.7 result was that spirits prices multiplied, and that per
sub-regions US$ 1 – 2/day 52.7 30.6 capita consumption dropped sharply from about 10
in the table) 4US$ 2/day 67.6 31.9 litres in 1916 to a little more than 2 litres in 1918.
In subsequent years, consumption grew somewhat but
Source: Blakely et al. [135]. remained on a low level, 3 – 4 litres, until after the Second
 Global use of alcohol, drugs and tobacco 493

World War. As can be seen in Fig. 2, the drop in alcohol liberalisation on tobacco consumption in 42 countries
consumption in 1917 and 1918 was accompanied by a between 1970 and 1995, found that trade liberalisation
marked decline in all of the harm indicators [45]. had a large and significant impact on smoking in low-
Similar relationships happened in Paris during both income countries, and a smaller, but still important effect
World Wars, when extreme shortages of alcohol were on smoking in middle-income countries, while having no
followed by dramatic declines in cirrhosis mortality effect on higher income countries [53].
[46]. More recently, the anti-alcohol campaign pursued A third natural experiment follows reductions in
by Gorbachev from 1985 – 88 was followed by a heroin supply to Australia and Canada in the early
dramatic decrease in death rates, followed by an even 2000s from the assumed major source, Myanmar, the
steeper increase in death rates as alcohol consumption effects of which were mediated by steep increases in the
increased in the early 1990s following socio-economic price of heroin [54 – 56]. After the reduction in heroin
transition [47]. supply, fatal and non-fatal heroin overdoses decreased
A second natural experiment is the impact of trade by between 40% and 85% in Australia and 35% in
liberalisation on cigarette consumption. Cigarette ex- Canada. Despite some evidence of increased cocaine,
ports, which had been relatively stable between 1975 and methamphetamine and benzodiazepine use and reports
1985, began rising at an increasing rate in the mid-1980s, of increases in harms related to their use, there were no
accelerating since the Global Agreement on Tariffs and increases recorded in the number of either non-fatal
Trade (GATT) (1994), with global cigarette exports overdoses or deaths related to these drugs. There was a
rising by 42% between 1993 and 1996. At the same time, sustained decline in injecting drug use as indicated by a
global cigarette consumption increased by 5% [48]. substantial drop in the number of needles and syringes
Between 1986 and 1990, US bilateral trade agreements distributed.
forced Japan, Taiwan, South Korea and Thailand to
open up their closed markets to American cigarette
exports [48,49]. It has been estimated that per capita Substance use and socio-economic
cigarette consumption was 10% higher on average by disadvantage
1991 in the four countries than it would have been in
Alcohol
the absence of the bilateral agreements [49] due to
both market expansion [50] and increased cigarette Whereas people who are in lower-income groups are
advertising [51,52]. An analysis of the impact of trade less likely to use alcohol than people in higher-income

Figure 2. Per capita alcohol consumption and indicators of alcohol-related harm in Denmark 1911 – 24. Index, 1916 ¼ 100. Source:
(Thorsen [45]).
494 Peter Anderson

groups, a different picture emerges among alcohol

Risk and protective factors for substance use
users, where people in lower socio-economic groups
tend to have a more hazardous and harmful pattern of There are a number of factors that place individuals,
use than people in higher socio-economic groups. This and in particular young people, at increased risk of
relationship has been observed in China [57], Brazil substance use, dependence and the social and health
[58,59], Ethiopia [60] and Nigeria [61], as well as in consequences [96]. Risk factors act in a cumulative way
high-income countries, such as France, Italy, Spain and over time. Some are present from the early years, others
Switzerland [62], the United Kingdom [63] and the emerge in adolescence.
United States [64, 65]. Earlier and problematic drug use during adolescence
In England, for men aged 25 – 69 years, those in the is more likely among young people who are raised in
lowest socio-economic status (SES) category (un- circumstances of extreme economic deprivation
skilled labour) had a 15-fold higher risk of alcohol- [97,98], in a sole parent household [99] and/or where
related mortality than professionals in the highest parents or other family members use drugs [100]. An
SES category [66]. In Sweden, up to 30% of the easy temperament in early childhood is protective, both
differential mortality for middle-aged men by socio- helping the child to adjust in positive ways and reducing
economic group is explained by alcohol consumption the influence of risk factors [101].
[67]. A review by the International Agency for Parents continue to be an important influence
Research on Cancer (IARC) noted a probable role throughout the primary school years but other factors,
of alcohol in inequalities found for certain cancers in including relationships with teachers, adjustment to
France and Italy, and were also suggestive of a school and experiences with peers, play an increasing
possible role in Denmark, Switzerland and the United role. Early school failure is a risk factor for later alcohol
Kingdom, but not in Finland or Sweden [68]. problems [102]. Children with behaviour problems
Similarly, alcohol has been found to be responsible through primary school are at risk of later drug use
for a proportion of the inequalities found for problems, with conduct disorder possibly more im-
hypertension Colhoun et al. [69]. The INTERSALT portant than attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder
study, involving 52 centres in 18 high-income and (ADHD) [97]. Aggression is a risk factor for later drug
12 low-income countries, found that adjusting for use [101], but the role of childhood depression is
alcohol (along with body mass index, smoking and unclear. Children who are socially and emotionally
sodium and potassium excretion) halved the associa- competent are more resilient in the face of risk factors
tion between low SES and higher blood pressure and, therefore, less likely to engage in alcohol and illicit
in men so that it was no longer statistically signifi- drug use [103].
cant [70]. Two aspects of the family environment are associated
with increased rates of both licit and illicit drug use in
young people in high-income countries. The first is
Illicit drugs
exposure to a disadvantaged home environment, with
Urban poverty is associated with increased illicit drug parental conflict and poor discipline and supervision;
use in cities in India [71], Nepal [72] and Brazil the second is exposure to parents’ and siblings’ use of
[73 – 75]. Similar findings have been found in the alcohol and other drugs [102]. In high-income coun-
United States [76 – 78]. In New Zealand [79 – 81] and tries, children who perform poorly in school because of
Australia [82] illicit drugs use is higher among impulsive or problem behaviour and those who are
indigenous peoples. early users of alcohol and other drugs are most likely to
use illicit opioids [104]. Affiliation with drug-using
peers is a risk factor for drug use that operates
Tobacco
independently of individual and family risk factors
Smoking rates are higher among Chinese men and [102,105].
women with lower educational achievement in both In the teenage years, young people become increas-
urban [83,84] and rural areas [85]. Similar findings are ingly independent of the family, making choices about
found in India [86 – 89], Pakistan [90], Bangladesh their own identity including their attitudes and beha-
[91], Brazil [59], Nigeria [92] and Tonga [93]. viours about substance use. Relationships with parents,
In most high-income countries, the prevalence other adults and the peer group all influence the risk of
of cigarette smoking is higher in lower socio- substance use [96]. At the same time, the attitudes,
economic groups [94]. Similarly, the INTERSALT behaviours and relationships developed at earlier stages
study involving 52 centres in 18 high-income and of childhood continue to be influential.
12 low-income countries [95] found that smoking Factors that help to protect adolescents against
prevalence was related to low educational attain- harmful substance use include attachment to the family
ment [70]. [100], parental harmony [106] and parents who
 Global use of alcohol, drugs and tobacco 495

monitor and supervise their children and have good apparent that early use of tobacco and alcohol is
skills in communication and negotiation [107]. Young predictive of later problems with tobacco dependence,
people are at increased risk where there is parent – alcohol and illicit drugs. It is also clear from long-
adolescent conflict [108], favourable parental attitudes itudinal research that use of alcohol and tobacco at an
to substance use [97], parental substance use problems early age predicts progression to heavier drug use, even
[100] and parental approval of substance (e.g. alcohol) after adjusting for the influence of a range of known
use in childhood or early adolescence [100]. developmental risk factors [115]. The mechanisms by
Substance use problems are more likely in young which legal drugs serve as ‘gateways’ in some sense for
people who do not complete high school and this is illegal drugs are not clear. Adolescent use of cannabis
influenced by earlier childhood development, includ- significantly increases the risk of later use of other illicit
ing school adjustment and behaviour problems [109]. drugs [116] but, none the less, only a small proportion
Academic achievement and feelings toward school are of cannabis users progress to use other illicit drugs
also relevant to illicit drug use [109]. Adolescents are [101].
more likely to use substances if they associate with Hippocrates, writing 2500 years ago, advised anyone
other young people who are using them [110]. coming to a new city to enquire whether it was likely
Delinquency in adolescence is also a risk factor to be a healthy or unhealthy place to live, depending
[101], but the influence of adolescent anxiety and on its geography, and the behaviour of its inhabitants
depression is unclear [96]. Other risk factors at this ‘whether they are fond of excessive drinking’ [117].
age include sensation-seeking and an adventurous He continued ‘as a general rule, the constitutions and
personality [102] and favourable attitudes to substance the habits of a people follow the nature of the land
use [110]. where they live’. The impact of the area and popu-
The use of substances escalates after the age of about lation in which people live is demonstrated clearly by
18 years and often peaks in early adulthood. Substance studies of large-scale migrations from one culture to
use in these years is strongly influenced by behaviours another in which, for example, an increase in risk
developed during the adolescent years, but other factors and coronary heart disease is observed when
influential factors include relationships with peers and individuals migrate from a low- to a high-risk culture
spouse, and patterns of behaviour in social, educational and assume the lifestyle of the new culture [118]. In
and employment settings [96]. Effective regulation of other words, and this applies to many risk factors and
alcohol in the community [111] and marriage are both conditions [119], including suicide [120], the beha-
protective [112]. Unemployment in early adulthood is viour and health of individuals are profoundly
associated with harmful alcohol use but this may be influenced by a society’s collective characteristics and
because both are outcomes of earlier risk factors [113]. social norms.
There is strong co-morbidity between adult mental Thus, it is not surprising that the risk of harmful
health problems and harmful drug use. substance use is heightened in a community where
Adolescent health and social problems tend to cluster there are higher levels (perceived and/or actual) of
[102,114]. Thus a young tobacco user is more likely to substance use [102], community disadvantage and
be a heavy drinker, use cannabis, engage in risky sexual disorganisation [121], ready availability of substances
activity, have higher antisocial behaviour and, if female, [102] and positive media portrayals of substance use
experience symptoms of depression. Similarly, different [122]. There is a linear relationship between cannabis
social settings (e.g. schools, local neighbourhoods) vary use among the general population and cannabis use
markedly in the rates and range of problems experi- among 15 – 16-year-olds [123], and a linear relation-
enced. This clustering reflects the clustering of social ship between the overall per capita alcohol consump-
and individual risk and protective factors. An adoles- tion and the proportion of heavy drinkers in a
cent’s positive connection or attachment to family, population [124].
school and community protect against a range of risk
behaviours as well as promoting positive educational
and social outcomes. Many adolescent health problems Trends in substance use
share important risk factors. Academic failure and
Alcohol
school dropout are associated with antisocial behaviour,
higher rates of substance use, tobacco use and emo- Based on recent trends in alcohol consumption (see
tional problems; factors such as poor family attachment Fig. 1), it is reasonable to assume that in most countries
and family conflict are linked to a broad range of of the world, alcohol consumption over the next 10 – 20
adolescent health problems. years is likely to remain reasonably stable. The
Finally, there are marked temporal and develop- exception to this is for the countries of the South-East
mental sequences concerning the ages of first use and Asian Region, and the low- to middle-income countries
the order of onset of use of substances [96]. It is of the Western Pacific Region (WPR-B) (constituting
496 Peter Anderson

nearly half of the world’s population), where consump- consumers will increase by 2.1% over those of the
tion is likely to increase. It has been predicted that year 2000 for SEAR-B and WPR-B, and by 0.7% for
the proportion of hazardous and harmful alcohol SEAR-D [24].

Figure 3. Stages of the topic epidemic for men and women. (1, early; 2, rising; 3, peak or maturity; 4, declining; and 5, late). Source: Ezzati
& Lopez (2004) [136].
 Global use of alcohol, drugs and tobacco 497

deaths have fallen sharply, often after various drug sub-

Drugs
stitution policy initiatives have been introduced [131].
There are a number of indications that rates of illicit drug The scale of illicit drug production and the choice of
use and illicit drug-related harm have risen in the past drugs for illicit manufacture also change [123]. At a
decade. High-income countries with reasonable mortality minimum it has been suggested that global drug-related
data have shown steady increases in drug-related deaths, harm will remain at about the current level, with
especially drug overdose deaths [125 – 127], and in the declines in drug-related deaths in high-income coun-
estimated number of dependent opioid users [125, tries (resulting from expanded opioid substitution
128]. Illicit drug use has also been reported in an treatment) being offset by increases in drug-related
increasing number of countries where it was previously deaths in low income countries [28]. A more likely
rare, such as in eastern Europe, the former Soviet option is a continuing increase in drug use and drug-
Union, Asia and Africa [123,129,130]. Despite indica- related harm throughout the world, with the brunt of
tions that drug-related harm is increasing, it is difficult the increase occurring in low-income countries.
to predict future patterns of illicit drug use and drug-
related harm as there is a lack of good time – series data.
Tobacco
And, although the general trend has been for drug-
related deaths to increase during the 1990s, there have The tobacco epidemic can be described in five stages
also been a number of countries in which drug-related (1, early; 2, rising; 3, peak or maturity; 4, declining; and

Table 4. Status of the tobacco epidemic in 2000 among males and females

Epidemic stage Country

Males
0.5 – 1 NA
1.5 – 2 AFR-D – all except Algeria, Mauritius, Seychelles; AFR-E – all except South Africa; EMR-B – Iran (Islamic
Republic of); EMR-D – Afghanistan, Djibouti, Somalia, Sudan; EUR-B – Azerbaijan, Tajikistan,
Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan
2.5 – 3 AFR-D – Algeria, Mauritius, Seychelles; AFR-E – South Africa; AMR-A – Cuba; AMR-B – all except
Argentina, Brazil, Chile; AMR-D – all; EMR-B – all except Iran (Islamic Republic of); EMR-D – Egypt,
Iraq, Morocco, Pakistan, Yemen; EUR-A – Croatia, Czech Republic, Greece, Portugal, Slovenia;
EUR-B – all except Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan; EUR-C – all; SEAR-B – all; SEAR-
D – all; WPR-A – Brunei Darussalam, Japan; WPR-B – all
3.5 – 4 AMR-B – Argentina, Brazil, Chile; EUR-A – Andorra, Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Israel,
Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, San Marino, Spain, Switzerland
4.5 – 5 AMR-A – Canada, USA; EUR-A – Belgium, Finland, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, United
Kingdom; WPR-A – Australia, New Zealand, Singapore
Females
0.5 – 1 AFR-D – all except Seychelles; AFR-E – all except South Africa; AMR-B – Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas,
Barbados, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Paraguay, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint
Vincent and Grenadines, Suriname; EMR-B – all except Cyprus, Jordan, Lebanon, Syrian Arab Republic;
EMR-D – all except Morocco; Albania, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan; SEAR-B –
Indonesia, Sri Lanka; SEAR-D – all except Myanmar, Nepal; WPR-A – Singapore; WPR-B – Cambodia,
China, Malaysia, Mongolia, Republic of Korea, Viet Nam
1.5 – 2 AFR-D – Seychelles; AFR-E – South Africa; AMR-B – Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic,
El Salvador, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay, Venezuela; AMR-D –
all; EMR-B – Cyprus, Jordan, Lebanon, Syrian Arab Republic; Morocco; EUR-A – Croatia, Czech
Republic, Greece, Israel, Malta, Portugal, San Marina, Slovenia; EUR-B – all except Albania, Azerbaijan,
Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan; EUR-C – all; SEAR-B – Thailand; SEAR-D – Myanmar, Nepal;
WPR-A – Brunei Darussalam, Japan; WPR-B – Cook Islands, Fiji, Kiribati, Lao People’s Democratic
Republic, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Nauru, Niue, Palau, Philippines, Samoa,
Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, Vanuatu
2.5 – 3 AMR-A – Cuba; AMR-B – Argentina, Brazil, Chile; EUR-A – Andorra, Austria, Denmark, Finland, France,
Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Monaco, Spain, Switzerland; WPR-B – Papua New Guinea
3.5 – 4 AMR-A – Canada, USA; EUR-A – Belgium, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, United Kingdom; WPR-A –
Australia, New Zealand
4.5 – 5 EUR-A – Sweden

Source: Ezzati & Lopez [136].

498 Peter Anderson

5, late, Fig. 3), and it seems clear that all countries [4] Glover IC. Prehistoric research in Timor. In: Mulvaney
progress through these stages. DJ, Golson J, eds. Aboriginal man and environment in
Australia. Canberra: Australian National University Press,
When classified by their country stage, it is the low- 1971:158 – 81.
income countries that are in the early stages of the [5] Glover IC. Prehistoric plant remains from Southeast Asia,
tobacco epidemic (3 or earlier) with all of them facing with special reference to rice. In: Taddei M, ed. South
huge increases in the consequences of tobacco use over Asian archaeology. Naples: Istituto Universitario Orien-
the coming decades, Table 4. tale, 1977:7 – 37.
[6] Gorman CF. Excavations at spirit cave, North Thailand:
some interim interpretations. Asian Perspect 1970;13:
Conclusions 79 – 108.
[7] Yen DE. Hoabinhian horticulture? The evidence and the
Two billion adults drink alcohol, 1.1 billion smoke questions from Northwest Thailand. In: Allen J, Golson J,
cigarettes and less than 0.2 billion use illicit drugs, with Jones R, eds. Sunda and Sahel. New York: Academic
Press, 1977:567 – 600.
substance use likely to increase over the coming [8] Watson P. This precious foliage: a study of the Aboriginal
decades. With economic development, alcohol use is psycho-active drug pituri. Sydney: University of Sydney,
likely to increase in low- and middle-income countries. 1983.
Such countries are also likely to see an increase in the [9] Feinhandler SJ, Fleming HC, Monahon JM. Pre-
use of illicit substances, and many of them are still in Columbian tobaccos in the Pacific. Econ Bot 1980;33:
213 – 26.
the early stages of the tobacco epidemic. Thus, [10] Schultes RE. Solanaceous hallucinogens and their role in
substance use disorders are increasingly going to be the development of New World cultures. In: Hawkes JG,
disorders of low-income countries. Already, alcohol Lester RN, Skelding AD, eds. The biology and taxonomy
and tobacco are the first and third most important risk of the Solanaceae. London: Academic Press, 1979:
factors for ill-health and premature death in low 137 – 60.
[11] Weir S. Qat in Yemen: consumption and social change.
mortality, low income countries, and 11th and ninth Dorset: Dorset Press, 1985.
in high-mortality, low-income countries [132]. This [12] Plowman T. The origin, evolution, and diffusion of coca,
will be compounded by the observation that in all Erythroxylum spp., in South and Central America. In:
countries hazardous and harmful substance use is Stone D, ed. Pre-Columbian plant migration. Papers of
concentrated in socio-economic disadvantaged groups. the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, no.
76. Cambridge: Peabody Museum of Archaeology and
To some extent, what will determine the extent of Ethnology, 1984:129 – 63.
global substance use and substance use disorders over [13] Balick MJ, Cox PA. Plants, people, and culture: the
the next decades is what happens in south east Asia and science of ethnobotany. New York: Scientific American
the Western Pacific; these are areas of the world with Library, 1997.
nearly half the world’s population, and are areas of the [14] Charrington EH, editor-in-chief. Standard encyclopaedia
of the alcohol problem, vol. 1. Westerville, OH: Aarau-
world in which the prevalence of alcohol and illicit drug Buckingham, 1925.
use are increasing and which are still to face the full [15] Sournia JC. A history of alcoholism. Cambridge, MA:
brunt of the tobacco epidemic. Blackwell, 1990.
The prevalence of illicit drug use is less than one- [16] Keller M. A historical overview of alcohol and alcoholism.
tenth that of alcohol use and less than one-fifth that of Cancer Res 1979;39:2822 – 9.
[17] Jellinek EM. Drinkers and alcoholics in Ancient Rome.
tobacco use, suggesting that the UN Conventions on J Stud Alcohol 1976;37:1721 – 43.
illicit drugs are, despite an increasing use of such drugs, [18] Vogt I. Defining alcohol problems as a repressive
having an impact. The extent to which the World mechanism: its formative phase in Imperial Germany and
Health Organisation’s Framework convention on to- its strength today. Int J Addict 1984;19:551 – 69.
bacco control will reduce tobacco use and whether or [19] Warner J. Craze. Gin and debauchery in an age of reason.
London: Profile Books, 2002.
not a similar convention is appropriate for alcohol [20] World Health Organisation. Global status report on alcohol
control remain to be seen. 2004. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2004.
[21] Skog O-J. Drinking and the distribution of alcohol con-
sumption. In: Pittman DJ, Raskin H, eds. White society,
culture, and drinking patterns reexamined. New
References Brunswick: Alcohol Research Documentation, 1991:
[1] Dudley R. Fermenting fruit and the historical ecology of 135 – 56.
ethanol ingestion: is alcoholism in modern humans an [22] Lemmens PH. Relationship of alcohol consumption and
evolutionary hangover? Addiction 2002;97:381 – 8. alcohol problems at the population level. In: Heather N,
[2] Sullivan RJ, Hagen EH. Psychotropic substance-seeking: Peters TJ, Stockwell T, eds. International handbook
evolutionary pathology or adpation? Addiction 2002;97: of alcohol dependence and problems. Chichester:
389 – 400. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2001:395 – 412.
[3] Marshall M. An overview of drugs in Oceania. In: [23] Wei H, Derson Y, Shuiyuan X, Lingjiang L, Yalin Z.
Lindstrom L, ed. Drugs in Western Pacific societies: Alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems:
relations of substance. ASAO Monograph no. 11. Lanham: Chinese experience from six area samples 1994. Addiction
University Press of America, 1987:13 – 49. 1999;94:1467 – 76.
 Global use of alcohol, drugs and tobacco 499

[24] Rehm J, Room R, Monteiro M, et al. Alcohol. In: [43] Weatherburn D, Jones C, Freeman K, Makkai T. Supply
Comparative quantification of health risks: global and control and harm reduction: lessons from the Australian
regional burden of disease due to selected major risk heroin ‘drought’. Addiction 2003;98:83 – 91.
factors. Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Murray CJL, eds. [44] Eriksen S. Denmark. In: Blocker JS, Fahey DM,
Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2004:959 – 1108. Tyrrell IT, eds. Alcohol and temperance in modern
[25] United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). history. Oxford, UK: ABC Clio, 2003.
World drug report. Vienna: UNODC, 2004. [45] Thorsen T. Hundrede års alkoholmisbrug [One hundred
[26] United Nations Office for Drug Control and Crime years of alcohol misuse]. Copenhagen: Alkohol- og
Prevention (UNODCCP). Global illicit drug trends, Narkotikarådet, 1990.
2002. New York: UNODCCP, 2002. [46] Ledermann S. Alcool, Alcoolisme, Alcoolisation. Institut
[27] Wodak A, Sarkar S, Mesquite F. The globalization of drug National d’Etudes Demographiques, Travauz et Docu-
injecting. Addiction 2004;99:799 – 801. ments, cahier no. 41. Paris: Presses Universitaires de
[28] Degenhardt L, Hall W, Warner-Smith M, Lynskey M. France, 1964.
Illicit drug use. In: Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, [47] Bobak M, Room R, Pikhart H, et al. Contributions of
Murray CJL, eds. Comparative quantification of health drinking patterns to differences in rates of alcohol related
risks: global and regional burden of disease due to selected problems between three urban populations. J Epidemiol
major risk factors. Geneva: WHO, 2004. Commun Health 2004;58:238 – 42. Available at: http://
[29] Jha P, Ranson MK, Nguyen SN, Yach D. Estimates of jech.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/58/3/238 (accessed
global and regional smoking prevalence in 1995 by age and July 2006).
sex. Am J Public Health 2002;92:1002 – 6. [48] Chaloupka FJ, Corbett M. Trade policy and tobacco:
[30] Shafey O, Dolwick S, Guindon GE, eds. Tobacco control towards an optimal policy mix. In: Abedian I, van der
country profiles. Geneva: World Health Organisation, Merwe R, Wilkins N, Jha P, eds. The economics of
2003. tobacco control: towards an optimal policy mix. Cape
[31] Gajalakshmi CK, Jha P, Ranson K, Nguyen S. Global Town: Applied Fiscal Research Centre, University of Cape
patterns of smoking and smoking-attributable mortality. In: Town, 1998:129 – 45.
Jha P, Chaloupka F, eds. Tobacco control in developing [49] Chaloupka FJ, Laixuthai A. US trade policy and cigarette
countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000:11 – 40. smoking in Asia. National Bureau of Economic Research
[32] Molarius A, Parsons RW, Dobson AJ, et al. Trends in working paper no. 5543. 1996. Available at: http://www.
cigarette smoking in 36 populations from the early 1980s nber.org/papers/w5543 (accessed July 2006).
to the mid-1990s: findings from the WHO MONICA [50] Hsieh CR, Hu TW. The demand for cigarettes in Taiwan:
project. Am J Public Health 2001;91:206 – 12. domestic versus imported cigarettes. Discussion paper no.
[33] Chaloupka FJ, Hu T, Warner KE, Jacobs R, Yurekli A. 9701. Nankang, Taipei: Institute of Economics, Academia
The taxation of tobacco products. In: Jha P, Chaloupka F, Sinica, 1997.
eds. Tobacco control in developing countries. Oxford: [51] Hagihara A, Takeshita YJ. Impact of American cigarette
Oxford University Press, 2000:237 – 72. advertising on imported cigarette consumption in Osaka,
[34] Chaloupka FJ, Grossman M. Price tobacco control policies Japan. Tob Control 1995;4:239 – 44.
and youth smoking. National Bureau of Economic [52] Hsieh CR, Lin YS. The economics of tobacco control in
Research working paper no. 5740. 1996. Available at: Taiwan. In: Abedian I, van der Merwe R, Wilkins N,
http://www.nber.org/papers/w5740 (accessed July 2006). Jha P, eds. The economics of tobacco control: towards an
[35] Babor TF, Caetano R, Casswell S, et al. Alcohol: no ordinary optimal policy mix. Cape Town: Applied Fiscal Research
commodity. Research and public policy. Oxford: Oxford Centre, University of Cape Town, 1998:306 – 29.
Medical Publications, Oxford University Press, 2003. [53] Taylor A, Chaloupka FJ, Guindon E, Corbett M. The
[36] Manski CF, Pepper JV, Petrie CV. Informing America’s impact of trade liberalization on tobacco consumption.
policy on illegal drugs: what we don’t know keeps hurting In Jha P, Chaloupka F, eds. Tobacco control in
us. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001. developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
[37] Silverman LP, Spruill NL. Urban crime and the price of 2000:343 – 64.
heroin. J Urban Econ 1977;4:80 – 103. [54] Degenhardt L, Reuter P, Collins L, Hall W. Evaluating
[38] Van Ours JC. The price elasticity of hard drugs: the case of explanations of the Australian ‘heroin shortage’. Addiction
opium in the Dutch East Indies, 1923 – 38. J Polit Econ 2005;100:459 – 69.
1995;103:261 – 79. [55] Degenhardt L, Day C, Dietze P, et al. Effects of a sustained
[39] Grapendall M. Cutting their coat according to their cloth: heroin shortage in three Australian States. Addiction
economic behaviour of Amsterdam opiate users. Int J 2005;100:908 – 20.
Addict 1992;27:487 – 501. [56] Wood E, Stoltz J-A, Li K, Montaner JSG, Kerr T.
[40] Saffer H, Chaloupka F. The demand for illicit drugs. Changes in Canadian heroin supply coinciding with the
Working paper no. 5238. Cambridge, MA: National Australian heroin shortage. Addiction 2006;101:689 – 95.
Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., 1995. [57] Siegrist J, Bernhardt R, Feng ZC, Schettler G. Socio-
[41] Caulkins JP. Estimating elasticities of demand for cocaine economic differences in cardiovascular risk factors in
and heroin with data from the drug use forecasting system. China. Int J Epidemiol 1990;19:905 – 10.
Carnegie Mellon University Heinz School working paper [58] Moreira LB, Fuchs FD, Moraes RS, et al. Alcoholic
WP-95-13. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, beverage consumption and associated factors in Porto
1995. Alegre, a southern Brazilian city: a population-based
[42] Grossman M, Chaloupka FJ, Brown CC. The demand for survey. J Stud Alcohol 1996;57:253 – 9.
cocaine by young adults: a rational addiction approach, [59] Duncan BB, Schmidt MI, Achutti AC, Polanczyk CA,
Paper presented at the Pacific Rim Allied Economic Benia LR, Maia AA. Socioeconomic distribution of non-
Organisation Conference, coordinated by the Western communicable disease risk factors in urban Brazil: the case
Economic Association International, Hong Kong, 10 – 15 of Porto Alegre. Bull Pan Am Health Org 1993;27:
January 1996. 337 – 49.
500 Peter Anderson

[60] Kebede D, Alem A. The epidemiology of alcohol [79] Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Lynskey M. The childhoods
dependence and problem drinking in Addis Ababa, of multiple problem adolescents: a 15-year longitudinal
Ethiopia. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1999;397:30 – 4. study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1994;35:1123 – 40.
[61] Bunker CH, Ukoli FA, Nwankwo MU, et al. Factors [80] Adamson SJ, Sellman JD, Futterman-Collier A, et al. A
associated with hypertension in Nigerian civil servants. profile of alcohol and drug clients in New Zealand: results
Prev Med 1992;21:710 – 22. from the 1998 national telephone survey. NZ Med J
[62] Pequignot G, Crosignani P, Terracini B, et al. A 2000;113:414 – 16.
comparative study of smoking, drinking and dietary [81] Pomare E, Keefe-Ormsby V, Ormsby C, et al. Hauora:
habits in population samples in France, Italy, Spain and Maori standards of health III. Wellington: Te Ropu
Switzerland. III. Consumption of alcohol. Rev d’Épidé- Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pomare, Wellington School of
miol Santé Publique 1988;36:177 – 85. Medicine, 1995.
[63] Acheson D. Independent inquiry into inequalities in health [82] Forero R, Bauman A, Chen JX, Flaherty B. Substance use
report. London: The Stationery Office, 1998. and sociodemographic factors among aboriginal and
[64] Pamuk E, Makuc D, Heck k, Reuben C, Lochner K. Torres Strait Islander school students in New South
Socioeconomic status and health chartbook. Health, Wales. Aust NZ J Public Health 1999;23:295 – 300.
United States, 1998. Hyattsville, MD: National Center [83] Yu Z, Nissinen A, Vartiainen E, Song G, Guo Z, Tian H.
for Health Statistics, 1998. Changes in cardiovascular risk factors in different socio-
[65] Midanik LT, Clark WB. The demographic distribution of economic groups: seven year trends in a Chinese urban
US drinking patterns in 1990: description and trends from population. J Epidemiol Commun Health 2000;54:692 – 6.
1984. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1218 – 22. [84] Koong SL, Serdula MK, Williamson DF, Malison MD,
[66] Harrison L, Gardiner E. Do the rich really die young? Davis RM. Smoking prevalence in the United States and
Alcohol-related mortality and social class in Great Britain, Taipei City, Taiwan. Am J Prev Med 1991;7:161 – 5.
1988 – 94. Addiction 1999;94:1871 – 80. [85] Hu TW, Tsai YW. Cigarette consumption in rural China:
[67] Hemström Ö. The contribution of alcohol to socio- survey results from 3 provinces. Am J Public Health
economic differentials in mortality—the case of Sweden. 2000;90:1785 – 7.
In: Norström T, ed. Consumption, drinking patterns, [86] Narayan KM, Chadha SL, Hanson RL, et al. Prevalence
consequences and policy responses in 15 European and patterns of smoking in Delhi: cross sectional study.
countries. Stockholm: National Institute of Public Health, BMJ 1996;312:1576 – 9.
2001. [87] Singh RB, Niaz MA, Thakur AS, Janus ED, Moshiri M.
[68] Moller H, Tonnesen H. Alcohol drinking, social class and Social class and coronary artery disease in a urban
cancer. IARC Scientific Publications 1997;138:251 – 63. population of north India in the Indian Lifestyle and Heart
[69] Colhoun H, Hemingway H, Poulter NR. Socioeconomic Study. Int J Cardiol 1998;64:195 – 203.
status and blood pressure: an overview analysis. J Hum [88] Gupta PC, Mehta FS, Pindborg JJ, et al. Intervention study
Hypertens 1998;12:91 – 110. for primary prevention of oral cancer among 36 000 Indian
[70] Stamler R, Shipley M, Elliott P, Dyer A, Sans S, Stamler J. tobacco users. Lancet 1986;1:1235 – 9.
Higher blood pressure in adults with less education. Some [89] Singh RB, Sharma JP, Rastogi V, et al. Social class and
explanations from INTERSALT. Hypertension 1992;19: coronary disease in rural population of north India. The
237 – 41. Indian Social Class and Heart Survey. Eur Heart
[71] Kushwaha KP, Singh YD, Rathi AK, Singh KP, J 1997;18:588 – 95.
Rastogi CK. Prevalence and abuse of psychoactive [90] Alam SE. Prevalence and pattern of smoking in Pakistan.
substances in children and adolescents. Indian J Pediatr J Pakistan Med Assoc 1998;48:64 – 6.
1992;59:261 – 8. [91] Ahsan H, Underwood P, Atkinson D. Smoking among male
[72] Jutkowitz JM, Spielmann H, Koehler U, Lohani J, teenagers in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Prev Med 1998;27:70 – 6.
Pande A. Drug use in Nepal: the view from the street. [92] Obot IS. The use of tobacco products among Nigerian
Subst Use Misuse 1997;32:987 – 1004. adults: a general population survey. Drug Alcohol Depend
[73] Pinto JA, Ruff AJ, Paiva JV, et al. HIV risk behavior and 1990;26:203 – 8.
medical status of underprivileged youths in Belo Hori- [93] Woodward A, Newland H, Kinahoi M. Smoking in the
zonte, Brazil. J Adolesc Health 1994;15:179 – 85. Kingdom of Tonga: report from a national survey. Tob
[74] Carlini EA. Research is badly needed to improve Control 1994;3:41 – 5.
programmes for the prevention and treatment of drug [94] Stellman SD, Resnicow K. Tobacco smoking, cancer and
abuse and drug dependence in Brazil. Drug Alcohol social class. IARC Scientific Publications 1997;138:
Depend 1990;25:169 – 73. 229 – 50.
[75] Cardia N. The search for neglected links: the connections [95] INTERSALT Cooperative Research Group (ICRG).
between urbanization and substance use among youth. Intersalt: an international study of electrolyte excretion
In: Obot IS, Saxena S, eds. Substance use among young and blood pressure. Results for 24 hour urinary sodium
people in urban environments. Geneva: World Health and potassium excretion. BMJ 1988;297:319 – 28.
Organisation, 2005. [96] Loxley W, Toumbourou JW, Stockwell T, et al. The
[76] Ensminger ME, Anthony JC, McCord J. The inner city prevention of substance use, risk and harm in Australia.
and drug use: initial findings from an epidemiological Canberra: National Drug Research Institute and Centre
study. Drug Alcohol Depend 1997;48:175 – 84. for Adolescent Health, 2004.
[77] Brownsberger W. Prevalence of frequent cocaine use in [97] Lynskey MT, Fergusson DM. Childhood conduct pro-
urban poverty areas. Contemp Drug Problems 1997;24: blems, attention deficit behaviors, and adolescent alcohol,
349 – 71. tobacco, and illicit drug use. J. Abnorm Child Psychol
[78] Boardman JD, Finch BK, Ellison CG, Williams DR, 1995;23:281 – 303.
Jackson JS. Neighborhood disadvantage, stress, and [98] Daniels N, Kennedy BP, Kawachi I. Why justice is good
drug use among adults. J Health Soc Behav 2001;42: for our health: the social determinants of health inequal-
151 – 65. ities. Daedalus 1999;128:125, 215 – 251.
 Global use of alcohol, drugs and tobacco 501

[99] Fergusson DM, Lynskey MT, Horwood LJ. Childhood [117] Hippocrates. Hippocratic writings. Edited with an
exposure to alcohol and adolescent drinking patterns. introduction by Lloyd GER. Harmondsworth: Penguin,
Addiction 1994;89:1007 – 16. 1978.
[100] Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Lynskey MT. The pre- [118] Kagan A, Harris BR, Winkelstein W, et al. Epidemiological
valence and risk factors associated with abusive or studies of coronary heart disease and stroke in Japanese
hazardous alcohol consumption in 16-year-olds. Addiction men living in Japan, Hawaii and California: demographic,
1995;90:935 – 46. physical, dietary and biochemical characteristics. J Chronic
[101] Williams P. Alcohol-related social disorder and rural Disord 1974;27:345 – 64.
youth. Part 2. Perpetrators. Trends and issues in crime [119] Rose G. The strategy of preventive medicine. Oxford:
and criminal justice series no. 149. Canberra: Australian Oxford University Press, 1992.
Institute of Criminology, 2000. [120] Durkheim E, trans Spaulding JA, Simpson G. Suicide: a
[102] Hawkins DJ, Catalano RF, Miller JY. Risk and protective study in sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul,
factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence 1952.
and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse [121] Smart R, Adlaf E, Walsh G. Neighbourhood socio-
prevention. Psychol Bull 1992;112:64 – 105. economic factors in relation to student drug use and
[103] Pulkkinen L, Pitkanen T. A prospective study of the programs. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse 1994;3:37 – 46.
precursors to problem drinking in young adulthood. J Stud [122] Flynn BS, Worden JK, Secker-Walker RH, Pirie PL,
Alcohol 1994;55:578 – 87. Badger GJ, Carpenter JH. Longterm responses of higher
[104] Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Swain-Campbell N. and lower risk youths to smoking prevention interventions.
Cannabis use and psychosocial adjustment in adolescence Prev Med 1997;26:389 – 94.
and young adulthood. Addiction 2002;97:1123 – 35. [123] United Nations Office for Drug Control and Crime
[105] Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Lynskey M. Child and Prevention (UNODCCP). World drug report 2000.
adolescent psychiatric disorders. In: Ellis P, Collings S, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
eds. Mental health in New Zealand from a public health [124] Academy of Medical Sciences. Calling time: the nation’s
perspective. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 1998:136 – 63. drinking as a major public health issue. London: Academy
[106] Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ. Early onset cannabis use of Medical Sciences, 2004. Available at: www.acmedsci.
and psychosocial adjustment in young adults. Addiction ac.uk (accessed June 2005).
1997;92:279 – 96. [125] Hall W, Ross J, Lynskey M, Law M, Degenhardt L. How
[107] Perry CL, Williams CL, Forster JL, et al. Background, many dependent heroin users are there in Australia? Med J
conceptualization and design of a community-wide Aust 2000;173:528 – 31.
research program on adolescent alcohol use: Project [126] de la Fuente L, Barrio G, Vicente J, Bravo M, Santacreu J.
Northland. Health Educ Res Theor Pract 1993;8:125 – 36. The impact of drug related deaths on mortality among
[108] Brody GH, Forehand R. Prospective associations among young adults in Madrid. Am J Public Health 1995;85:
family form, family processes, and adolescents’ alcohol and 102 – 5.
drug use. Behav Res Ther 1993;31:587 – 93. [127] Hall W, Lynskey M, Degenhardt L. Trends in opiate-
[109] Campo AT, Rohner RP. Relationships between perceived related deaths in the United Kingdom and Australia,
parental acceptance and rejection. Psychological adjust- 1985 – 1995. Drug Alcohol Depend 2000;57:247 – 54.
ment, and substance abuse among young adults. Child [128] Hall W, Ross J, Lynskey M, Law M, Degenhardt L. How
Abuse Neglect 1992;16:429 – 40. many dependent heroin users are there in Australia?
[110] Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ. Does cannabis use encou- NDARC Monograph no. 44. Sydney: National Drug and
rage other forms of illicit drug use? Addiction Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales,
2000;95:505 – 20. 2000.
[111] Homel R, McIlwain G, Carvolth R. Creating safer [129] UNAIDS (2001) Joint United Nations Programme on
drinking environments. In: Heather N, Peters TJ, HIV/AIDS. Available at: http://www.unaids.org (accessed
Stockwell T, eds. International handbook of alcohol 2001).
dependence and problems. Chichester: John Wiley and [130] United Nations International Drug Control Programme
Sons, 2001:721 – 40. (UNDCP). Global illicit drug trends 2000. Vienna:
[112] Kandel DB, Simcha-Fagan O, Davies M. Risk factors for UNDCP, 2000.
delinquency and illicit drug use from adolescence to young [131] Lepere B, Gourarier L, Sanchez M, et al. Reduction in the
adulthood. J Drug Issues 1986;16:67 – 90. number of lethal heroin overdoses in France since 1994.
[113] Darke S, Ross J, Hando J, Hall W, Degenhardt L. Illicit Focus on substitution treatments. Ann Med Interne
drug use in Australia: epidemiology, use patterns and 2001;152:S5 – 12.
associated harm. National Drug Strategy Monograph [132] Ezzati M, Rodgers A, Lopez AD, Vender Hoorn S,
series no. 43. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Murray CJL. Mortality and burden of disease attributable
Health and Aged Care, 2000. to individual risk factors. In: Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers
[114] Catalano RF, Hawkins JD. The social development model: A, Murray CJL, eds. Comparative quantification of health
a theory of antisocial behavior. In: Hawkins JD, ed. risks: global and regional burden of disease due to selected
Delinquency and crime: current theories. New York: major risk factors. Geneva: World Health Organisation,
Cambridge University Press, 1996:149 – 97. 2004:2141 – 65.
[115] McGee R, Williams S, Poulton R, Moffitt T. A long- [133] Rehm J, Chisholm D, Room R, Lopez A. Alcohol.
itudinal study of cannabis use and mental health from In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, et al. Disease
adolescence to early adulthood. Addiction 2000;95:491 – control priorities in developing countries, 2nd edn. Ox-
503. ford: Oxford University Press, 2006:887 – 906.
[116] Newcomb MD, Felix-Ortiz M. Multiple protective and [134] Jha P, Chaloupka FJ, Moore J, et al. Tobacco addiction.
risk factors for drug use and abuse: cross-sectional and In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, et al. Disease
prospective findings. J Pers Soc Psychol 1992;63:280 – control priorities in developing countries, 2nd edn.
96. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006:869 – 86.
502 Peter Anderson

[135] Blakely T, Hales S, Kieft C, Wilson N, Woodward A. [137] Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Murray CJL. Preface.
Distribution of risk factors by poverty. In: Ezzati M, In: Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Murray CJL, eds.
Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Murray CJL, eds. Comparative Comparative quantification of health risks: global and
quantification of health risks: global and regional burden of regional burden of disease due to selected major risk
disease due to selected major risk factors. Geneva: World factors. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2004:xxiii.
Health Organisation, 2004:1941 – 2128.
[136] Ezzati M, Lopez AD. Smoking and oral tobacco use. In:
Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Murray CJL, eds.
Comparative quantification of health risks: global and
regional burden of disease due to selected major risk factors.
Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2004:883 – 957.

Appendix 1. The 14 GBD epidemiological sub-regions

WHO Mortality
region stratum1 Countries

AFR D Algeria, Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Chad, Comoros, Equatorial
Guinea, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Madagascar, Mali,
Mauritania, Mauritius, Niger, Nigeria, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra
Leone, Togo
E Botswana, Burundi, Central African Republic, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of
the Congo, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Rwanda,
South Africa, Swaziland, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe
AMR A Canada, Cuba, United States of America
B Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa
Rica, Dominica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Grenada, Guyana, Honduras, Jamaica,
Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the
Grenadines, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay, Venezuela
D Bolivia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Haiti, Nicaragua, Peru
EMR B Bahrain, Cyprus, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libyan Arab
Jamahiriya, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syrian Arab Republic, Tunisia, United Arab
Emirates
D Afghanistan, Djibouti, Egypt, Iraq, Morocco, Pakistan, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen
EUR A Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany,
Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway,
Portugal, San Marino, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom
B Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan,
Poland, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovakia, Tajikistan, The former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan
C Belarus, Estonia, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Republic of Moldova, Russian
Federation, Ukraine
SEAR B Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Thailand
D Bangladesh, Bhutan, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, India, Maldives, Myanmar,
Nepal
WPR A Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore
B Cambodia, China, Cook Islands, Fiji, Kiribati, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Malaysia,
Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Mongolia, Nauru, Niue, Palau, Papua
New Guinea, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu,
Vanuatu, Viet Nam
1
A: very low child mortality and very low adult mortality; B: low child mortality and low adult mortality; C: low child
mortality and high adult mortality; D: high child mortality and high adult mortality; E: high child mortality and very
high adult mortality. High-mortality developing subregions: AFR-D, AFR-E, AMR-D, EMR-D and SEAR-D. Low-
mortality developing subregions: AMR-B, EMR-B, SEAR-B, WPR-B. Developed subregions: AMR-A, EUR-A,
EUR-B, EUR-C and WPR-A. Source: Ezzati et al. [137].