Surgery 2.01.1 Abdominal Wall - Dr. Mendoza
Surgery 2.01.1 Abdominal Wall - Dr. Mendoza
Surgery 2.01.1 Abdominal Wall - Dr. Mendoza
Page 1 of 5
Trans Group: Maribie Minor, Mark Mirabueno, Ginny Misa, Arem Molina
Edited By: H. Palparan
III. Cross Section of the Abdominal Wall o Superior epigastric vessels -superior epigastric
The complexities of the anterior and posterior aspects of artery arises from the internal thoracic artery
the rectus sheath are best understood in their relationship o Inferior epigastric vessels - inferior epigastric
to arcuate line or semicircular line of Douglas, which is at artery arises from the external iliac artery
the level of the ASIS (Schwartz). Majority of the lymphatic drainage of the abdominal wall is
Borders of the arcuate Line to the major nodal basins in the superficial and axillary
a. Superiorly: WITH posterior rectus sheath areas.
b. Inferiorly: WITHOUT posterior rectus sheath
V. Dermatomal Sensory Innervations
Dermatomal levels are based on its relationship with
specific spinal levels
Motor innervation – anterior rami of T6-T12
Sensory innervation – T4- L1
o Umbilicus – T10
Page 2 of 5
B. Paramedian incision – lateral to the midline Right of midline
C. Right subcostal (Kocher); Saber Slash incision– for open Parts of organs may be free in the amniotic fluid – no sac
gallbladder surgery C. Meckel’s Diverticulum
D. Bilateral subcostal (Bucket Handle, Chevron, Gable); Persistence of a vitelline duct remnant on the ileal border
“Mercedes Benz” – for upper GI surgery (stomach, Vitelline duct usually regresses during the 3rd trimester
pancreas) Can develop into Meckel’s diverticulitis that mimics
E. Rocky-Davis; Weir incision– for appendectomy appendicitis
F. McBurney incision – for appendectomy
G. Transverse incision– for pediatric patients D. Vitelline Duct Fistula
H. Pfannensteil (Bikini Cut) – for obstetric procedures Complete failure of the vitelline duct to regress
Associated with drainage of small intestine contents from
VII. ABDOMINAL WALL EXPOSURE the umbilicus
Figure 5.Omphalocoele
B. Gastroschisis
Viscera protrude through a defect lateral to the umbilicus
Umbilical cord is not involved
Figure 6. Gastroschisis
Page 3 of 5
IX. ACQUIRED ABNORMALITIES
A. Rectus Abdominis Diastasis (Diastasis Recti)
Page 4 of 5
A. Epigastric Hernia C. Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
Midline between xiphoid and umbilicus A 5mm incision is made, into which the camera, scope,
Single or multiple, generally small instruments, and mesh are inserted and the defect
Contains omentum or falciform ligament patched
Congenital due to defective midline fusion of lateral Tension-free, smaller incision
abdominal wall muscles Technique based on open preperitoneal repair described
Managed by elective hernia repair by Stoppa and Rives et. Al
B. Umbilical Hernia Used in the treatment of complicated groin and incisional
Occurs at umbilical ring hernia, and in the treatment of large eventrations
May either be present at birth or develop gradually during Recurrence rate is 3.8% (this is relatively low)
life Mesh infection rate is 0.6% (low)
Seen in 10% of newborns, usually premature birth Wound infection rate is 1.1% (low)
Closes spontaneously at 5 years of age Fistula formation is 0.1%
If closure does not occur by this time, elective surgical
repair usually is advised D. Advantages of LVHR
Surgery if with pain or incarceration or strangulation Low rate of conversion to open hernia repair
Primary suture closure or mesh placement (>2cm) Shorter hospital star
Open or laparoscopic methods. Earlier return to activity
Less complications
C. Spigelian Hernia Low risk of infection
At the area where arcuate line crosses the linea semilunaris Low risk of recurrence
Rare, occurs at Spigelian line Effective in complex patients
Lateral border of rectus abdominis Based on available date in literature, it is recommended
Most common location: slightly above arcuate line that laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair should be
Usually not clinically evident unless with pain or the standard of care for all ventral hernias
incarceration
Incisional Hernia repair
D. Special Considerations A. Comparative studies of Laparoscopic vs. open incisional
Patients with liver cirrhosis + ascites + umbilical hernia hernia repair
Enlargement of the umbilical ring occurs due to increased Postoperative complication rate is less in the lap group vs
intra-abdominal pressure from the ascites the open group (23.3% vs. 30.2%)
First line of therapy: control the ascites first with diuretics, Recurrence rate is 4% for lap approach vs 16.5% for open
dietary management, and paracentesis for tense ascites approach
with respiratory compromise
Medical management or liver transplantation or TIPS B. LIHR- Risk Reduction Strategies
Patients with refractory ascites may need transjugular Overlap defect by up to 3.5 cm
intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or eventual liver Use composite mesh
transplantation. Umbilical hernia should be deferred until Use adequate fixation
after the ascites is controlled. Decrease abdominal pressure when anchoring the mesh
Watch out for bleeding from epigastric vessels
XII. Ventral Hernia Repair Close 10mm port sites
A. Open Tissue Repair (“vest over pants”) Use compressive bandage dressing
Recurrence rate from this type of repair ranges from 31%- Long acting local anesthetics at suture fixation sites
54% during long term follow up (high recurrence rate) Use appropriate techniques in difficult areas
Has tension and if not treated can lead to incarceration,
strangulation, and gangrene
Page 5 of 5